US Watch Crossing borders: where is the QE money?

US Watch
Group Economics
Macro & Financial Markets Research
Maritza Cabezas, +31 20 343 5618
Crossing borders: where is the QE money?
16 December 2014

After five years of low interest rates, US investors are increasingly showing more preference for
relatively safe assets in their search for yield. High-rated governments and financial institutions have
benefitted the most.
Indeed, since the first round of asset purchases or quantitative easing (QE) in 2008, US investors have
been gradually shifting to high-yield assets originating from Canada and Australia. It is even the case
that there is some concentration of capital flows to bonds issued by these countries.
Meanwhile, the value of US holdings in emerging markets as a share of total foreign holdings has
increased recently, mainly showing a preference for higher yielding bonds, but with high credit ratings.
From a sector perspective, after financial and governments, the energy sector has benefitted the most
from US capital flows in this period. There has already been a correction in this sector given the sharp
drop in oil prices.



US monetary easing and risk appetite
That said, more than five years of accommodative monetary
Now that the US economy is leading the global recovery and is
policy have had an impact on US investors’ risk appetite. This
preparing to shift towards monetary policy normalisation, the
had important international spillover effects on asset prices
discussion is centred on the implications of policy
and global investment flows. Announcements associated with
normalisation for countries that benefitted from the search for
the Fed’s asset purchase programmes were followed by a
yield and the low interest rate environment in the US. Since
rapid increase in US investors’ holdings of foreign equity
the financial crisis, the Fed has pursued a highly
securities and foreign debt. The greatest response was
accommodative monetary policy with low interest rates and
recorded after the initial QE programme in 2008, but
raising the asset side of the Fed’s balance sheet to over USD
subsequent rounds also had an impact, albeit on a more
4.48 trillion from nearly USD 1 trillion at the end of 2008. The
modest scale. Although it is difficult to determine the direct
asset purchase programme was finally brought to an end in
impact of QE on capital flows, US investments in the foreign
October 2014 and Fed officials are now discussing the
equity markets more than doubled over the past five years,
conditions for a rate hike.
with only 20% attributable to price increases. The strong
demand for equities for some is not only attributable to QE, but
US holdings of selected securities during QE
also to the improvement in corporate profits that has
USD billions
18000
accompanied the process.
Q3
Q2
Q1
16000
Advanced economies more attractive to US investors
14000
12000
Foreign debt securities
10000
Commercial paper
8000
The geographical distribution of US cross-border investments
shows that the United Kingdom is a main destination, followed
by Cayman Islands, Canada, Japan and Australia. Since the
Corporate bonds
start of QE, the fastest growth of US investments in foreign
6000
holdings has been recorded in Canada, Australia, Ireland and
4000
Mortgage backed securities (Fed)
2000
Treasuries and agency debt (Fed)
0
Q1 2007
Q3 2009
Source: Thomson Reuters Datastream
Q1 2012
Q3 2014
the Netherlands. The US investments in emerging markets as
a share of total investments remain relatively low and have
been somewhat volatile in the past five years.
2
Crossing borrders: where is
s the QE money
y? – 16 Decem
mber 2014
Ad
dvanced econ
nomies mostt attractive to US investors
s
QE
Q and US foreign assets
% off total foreign hold
dings
holdings of US inv
nvestors in % of GDP
80
45
Corporate
e equities QE1
70
QE3
QE2
40
60
50
40
35
euro‐ euro‐
zone zone 22% 25 %
2013
2008
30
30
25
20
20
10
15
Q4 2005
0
Advanced
economies
Carribean financial
C
centers
Emerging Markets
Inte
ernational
Organisations
25
20
2
2013
15
10
5
0
EZ
UK
Carribean
Can
nada
Japan
S
Switzerland
Australia
Sou
urce: US Treasuryy
Q4 2010
15
14
Corporat
te bonds
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
Q4 2005
Q
Q4
2007
Q4 2009
2
Q4 201
11
Q4 2013
So
ource: Thomson Reuters
R
Datastream
m
Fro
om a flow persp
pective, the mo
ost recent data show that Asia
a
has
s had the stron
ngest growth, with
w Eastern Eu
urope and Latin
n
ut the search fo
or yield was noot the only motiivation driving
Bu
Am
merica declining
g. It should be mentioned thatt capital flows tto
inv
vestors. In view
w of regulatoryy requirements,, there has bee
en
em
merging marketss are somewha
at understated, since the data
a
an
n increasing pre
eference for hi gh-grade relatively safe asse
ets
collected are base
ed on residencce. This means
s that emerging
g
that are more liquid. Where thee largest shifts have been ma
ade
arkets that issue
ed debt securitties through forreign
ma
is in debt securitties. Data sugggest that investors have been
sub
bsidiaries in Ire
eland or the Ne
etherlands, for instance,
i
are n
not
sh
hifting their fore
eign financial seector bonds and government
included in emerg
ging markets.
bo
onds to instrum
ments with high er credit rating
gs. Currently US
S
inv
vestments in cross-border coorporate bonds amount to 20%
% of
Mo
oreover, it is important to reco
ognise that porttfolio
total corporate bond holdings, bbut this ratio ha
as doubled since
rea
allocations that seem relatively small for US investors are
009.
20
larg
ge from the perrspective of em
merging marketts receiving
cap
pital flows. Eve
en small change
es in US holdin
ngs can genera
ate
Moreover, if we compare
c
the reelationship betw
ween holdings of
larg
ge asset pricess responses, ass was the case
e during the
do
omestic govern
nment bonds annd foreign government bondss,
tap
pering event in the summer off 2013. Where emerging
we
e see that, sinc
ce QE, there haas been an inc
crease in dema
and
ma
arkets are conccerned, Malaysia, Peru and Poland posted t he
for higher-yieldin
ng bonds from ssovereigns. Ho
oldings of
stro
ongest growth in terms of market capitalisattion.
anadian and Australian goverrnment bonds, for instance,
Ca
US
S investors and
d their choice
e of assets
As mentioned, fro
om a portfolio allocation
a
persp
pective, US
investors generally have a stron
ng preference for
f equities. A
tota
al of 70% of cro
oss border inve
estments are in
n equities. The
e
ha
ave increased significantly
s
sinnce the start off QE, while the
be
etter rated eme
erging market loocal governme
ent bonds have
e
als
so increased.
Demand
D
for high-yield sovvereigns in EM
M
US
S is the only cou
untry that holdss more foreign equities than
fore
eign debt. The Netherlands iss second, holdiing 46% of its
fore
eign investmen
nts in equities. We see that th
his preference
er the asset pu
has
s increased afte
urchase progra
ammes, when w
we
USD billioon
70
00
60
00
50
00
tak
ke away the pricce effect. Inve
estments in fore
eign equities
40
00
am
mount now to 20
0% of total US investments.
30
00
20
00
Acc
cording to the B
BIS, there are many equity markets
m
in which
h
the
e expected payo
off from dividends exceeded the real yields
on longer-dated h
high-quality bon
nds, making it more attractive
e
for market particip
pants to extend
d their search for
f yield beyond
d
fixe
ed-income marrkets. Stocks pa
aying high and
d stable dividen
nds
were seen as parrticularly attracttive and posted
d large gains.
10
00
0
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Advanced economies excluding US
So
ource: US Treasurry
Emeerging markets
3
Crossing borrders: where is
s the QE money
y? – 16 Decem
mber 2014
US
S investors ste
epped up investments in hig
gh-rated
fina
ancials and th
he energy sector
mplications of US policy norrmalisation
Im
Over the past few
w years, energyy (oil and gas) and
a consumerr
A future hike in US
U interest ratees could make other assets
ousehold
discretionary (autto components, hotels and ho
he
more attractive, making certainn sectors more vulnerable. Th
durrables) sectors have benefitte
ed most from US
U capital flowss
ata suggest tha
at US investorss have been inc
creasingly
da
afte
er the two leading sectors govvernment and financials. US
sh
howing more prreference for reelatively safe assets
a
in their
investors have pa
articularly stepp
ped up their forreign
se
earch for yield. We do, howevver, see some concentration
c
i
in
investments in en
nergy. In 2008, investors held USD 344 billio
on
co
ountries and in specific sectorrs, including en
nergy. Indeed,
in equities
e
and US
SD 56 billion in
n debt in the en
nergy sector.
sin
nce the first rou
und of asset puurchases or qu
uantitative easing
Investments in eq
quities have alm
most doubled and
a debt has
(Q
QE), US investo
ors have been gradually shifting to high-yield
nea
arly tripled sincce then.
as
ssets originating from Canadaa and Australia
a. The asset
allocation is already changing w
with the recentt oil price collap
pse.
Alth
hough, the ann
nouncement to end the asset purchase
pro
ogramme in mid
d-2013 led to volatility,
v
particu
ularly in
em
merging marketss, foreign econ
nomies that rec
ceived these
cap
pital flows have
e tried to impro
ove their fundam
mentals since
the
en. But those th
hat are lagging will remain vulnerable. We
thin
nk that much off the normalisa
ation process will
w depend on
how
w the process iis communicated and managed. Fed officia ls
hav
ve said recentlyy that, in this process,
p
they will
w take into
acc
count the impact on financial markets. Exac
ctly how this willl
ma
aterialise is not yet known. A gradual
g
approa
ach that allows
US
S policymakers to evaluate the
e impact will lik
kely be the
pre
eferred option. W
We expect the
e Fed to hike interest rates
slow
wly. We foreca
ast the federal funds
f
rate to rise to 1.0% at
yea
ar-end 2015 an
nd to 3% at yea
ar-end 2016. This would mea n
tha
at the rate is hikked every other meeting from
m June 2015,
followed by a step
p-up in hike every meeting un
ntil the rate
aches 3% in 20
016.
rea
Fin
nd out more abo
out Group Eco
onomics at: http
ps://insights.a
abnamro.nl/en
n/
O. It is solely intended to provide financial annd general information on economics. The infformation in this docum
ment is strictly proprieta
ary and is being supplie
ed to
This document has been prepared by ABN AMRO
s
for your informattion. It may not (in who
ole or in part) be reprod
duced, distributed or paassed to a third party or
o used for any other purposes than stated abbove. This document is
s informative in nature and
you solely
does
s not constitute an offerr of securities to the pu
ublic, nor a solicitation to make such an offer.
r.
No re
eliance may be placed
d for any purposes wha
atsoever on the informa
ation, opinions, forecassts and assumptions co
ontained in the docume
ent or on its completenness, accuracy or fairness. No representation
n or
warra
anty, express or implie
ed, is given by or on be
ehalf of ABN AMRO, orr any of its directors, offficers, agents, affiliate
es, group companies, or
o employees as to the accuracy or completeness of the information
n
conta
ained in this documentt and no liability is acce
epted for any loss, aris
sing, directly or indirecttly, from any use of suc
ch information. The views and opinions expreessed herein may be subject
s
to change at an
ny
given
n time and ABN AMRO
O is under no obligation
n to update the informa
ation contained in this ddocument after the datte thereof.
oduct of ABN AMRO Ba
ank N.V., you should obtain
o
information on va
various financial and oth
her risks and any poss
sible restrictions that yoou and your investmen
nts activities may encou
unter
Before investing in any pro
unde
er applicable laws and regulations. If, after reading this document, you
y consider investing in a product, you are advised
a
to discuss such an investment with yyour relationship manager or personal adviso
or and
chec
ck whether the relevantt product –considering the risks involved- is appropriate
a
within yourr investment activities. The value of your inve
estments may fluctuatee. Past performance is no guarantee for future
e
returrns. ABN AMRO reservves the right to make amendments
a
to this ma
aterial.
© Co
opyright 2014 ABN AM
MRO Bank N.V. and affi
filiated companies ("AB
BN AMRO").