Hypernuclear implications of Nijmegen soft

2007/3/2 伊勢志摩
YN/YY 相互作用とハイパー核
ΞN interactionをめぐって
Y. Yamamoto
Tsuru University
核力から核構造・反応へ
核物理の原点
・Shell model の成立
・BBG theory
lowest order
G-matrix
G-matrix theory は核物理における確立した基礎理論
有用なツール
Nuclear Saturation Problemは基本的には解決済み
Nuclear saturation curve for ESC04
中性子星
including MIR
Fujita-Miyazawa
MIR is quite similar to Illinois-TBR
Nucleon optical potential
Hyperon-nucleus potential
derived in the same framework
from underlying BB interactions
背景に同じ物理がある
核力
G-matrix interaction
folding
核力から核構造
YN/YY
hypernuclei
本当の意味は?
bare interactionを使って計算すれば良いということではない!
玉垣さんのテキストより
π π
核力の特性とメソンの役割
●
●
●
●
OPEP tail π
領域Ⅱの強い引力 “σ”
テンソル力 π-ρ
LS力 “σ”+ω+ρ
● repulsive core
原子核の性質
QM core ?
領域Ⅲの性質は顕著には現れない(ひっそりと支え
る)
テンソル力は2次項が支配的役割
原子核におけるπ もしくはテンソル力
dominant roles
“σ” の実体、3体力
saturation のコントロール
minor roles
OPEP tail
effective tensor による weak mixing
2π-exchange via
Δ-excitation
σ-meson
の実体
核力における
引力の主要項
ESCではpair terms
by 玉垣さん
2000/7
Before NAGARA
Fujita-Miyazawa
TBF
ΛΛ引力は弱い
ESC modeling
PS, S, V, AV nonets
not taken
(ππ),(πρ),(πω),(πη),(σσ)
PS-PS exchange
領域Ⅲ
Repulsive core の成因
ESC
ポメロン+ω
FSS/fss2
チャネル・状態依存性はあまりない
QMに特有のチャネル依存性がある
ハイパー核で領域Ⅲを見れるか?
実はESC04の顕著な特質は r<1 fm に依拠している
heavy mesons
Region Ⅲ = repulsive core ではない !? 豊かな物理?
ハイパー核物理の目標
Λ核の諸特性、Σ核、ΛΛ核、Ξ核 ・・・
多様な存在形態を相互作用の特質
(mesons & core)と関連付けて
統一的に理解すること
S=0系には登場しない多彩なメソンの役割は?
領域Ⅲの特質はいかに発現するか?
YN/YY相互作用の研究は
ストレンジネス多体系の新たな質の
発見と連動する現在進行形である
ESC-modelingにおける新たな実体
(多様なpair terms、AV mesons)
の導入は、その方向に沿った試みである
attractive UΞ、 repulsive UΣ、small s.o. splitting
BNL-E885
Motoba’s calculation
U0~ -14 MeV
KEK-E176
P-state nuclear
bound state
UΞ~ -16 MeV
Our methodology
① Study of Ξ hypernuclei/ΞN interaction is
in a phenomenological stage (現象論的段階)
② Our starting point is to consider the experimental
suggestions of attractive UΞ(~ -14MeV)
as a working assumption (作業仮説)
③ ΞN interaction models giving rise to attractive UΞ
are investigated through structure calculations
for Ξ hypernuclei
まずは古い話から・・・
Special modeling in ND
related to attractive ΞN interaction
not taken
ΞN
NN
No space-exchange component in VΞN(OBE)
because S=-2 cannot be carried by a boson
A longstanding model giving attractive UΞ
NHC-D
Special modeling to include only singlet scalar meson (σ)
Another possibility ESC04d
What difference from NHC-D ?
NHC-F
NSC89
NSC97
repulsive!
Phys. Rev. C73, 044008 (2006)
Extended Soft-Core Model ESC04
●Two-meson exchange processes are treated explicitly
no effective bosons are used
●PS,
S, V, AV meson-nonets are taken into account
● Meson-Baryon
coupling constants are consistent with
Quark-model predictions
Parameter fitting
G-matrix
not only YN scattering data
Hypernuclear data
Different predictions for Ξ hypernuclear states
most interesting for Ξstates
From the particle-physics point of view
ESC04d is favored
1. pv-coupling for the pseudo-scalar mesons
2. SU3-symmetry for the couplings
ESC04
ESC06
Too complicated ???
ΛΛ phase shifts
Old data
Pair
Nagara
diagonal
coupling
Total
OBE
Total (repulsion)
Pair
Pair
Strong ΛΛ-ΞN coupling from Pair terms
Strong ΞN-ΛΛ
coupling
Exp
~ 1.0
ESC04 models are consistent with NAGARA data
Strong 13S1 attraction !
strong P-state attraction
Adjustable parts:
ESC04
Medium-induced repulsion
NHC-D
Hard-core radius
Specific bound states in 2-,3-,4-body systems
Pair
OBE
Total
On the other hand
ΛN:
Pair attractive
OBE repulsive
OBE
repulsive
Pair
attractive
ΛN case
Canceling of Scalar and Vector
V
V
S
S
OBE attraction in ΞN 13S1 state
PS
Canceling of
V and AV
Attraction
of S appears
V
ω
cancel
S
ε
attractive
AV
a1
A folding model for Ξ-hypernuclei
Density-dependent G-matrix interaction
including
imaginary
part
Lane term
(standard in derivations of optical potential)
Ξ-+closed-core systems
adjusted
Note!
Mass-dependence
Conversion width
with ESC04d
Lane term ~ (N-Z+1)/4
available
(K-,K+)
N=Z
cores
N>Z
cores
(K-,K0)
Ξ hypernuclei produced by (K-,K+) reactions on available targets
Features of ESC04d and NHC-D
Mass-dep of BΞ
Lane term
light Ξ-states
Conversion width
ESC04d
NHC-D
weak
strong
strong
○
large
weak
×
small
In the case of FSS/fss2
Conclusion (ESC04 and Ξhypernuclei)
A ”solution” of ESC04 modeling leads
to attractive UΞ
U0≒-14 MeV(if true) is realized by
strong 13S1 attraction in ESC04 model
There exist some s-shell Ξ-bound states
dominated by 13S1 components
Conversion width ΓΞ is large due to
strong ΞN-ΛΛ coupling in 11S0 state
These features are completely different from FSS/fss2 models!!!