T o ZENO EFFECT, RIDGED MIRRORS and ATOMIC NANOSCOPY Dmitrii Kouznetsov, Inst. for Laser Science, UEC Collaboration: Hilmar Oberst, Fujio Shimizu, Kazuko Shimizu, Makoto Morinaga, Junichi Fujita, J-F. Bisson, Kenichi Ueda (Japan); and Alexander Neumann, Yulya Kuznetsova, Steve Brueck (UNM, USA) Quantum reflection is interpreted as Zeno Effect Ridged atomic mirror is considered as focusing element for the sub-micron resolution atom optics (atomic nanoscope). The reflectivity is approximated with elementary functions. Such fit agrees with experimental data and allows optimization of ridged mirrors. Ridged mirrors in the atomic imaging system: ~ 20 nm ? and A.Neumann, Yu.Kuznetsova, S.R.J.Brueck (UNM, USA) Fujio Shimizu 清水 富士夫 collaboration with Kazuko Shimizu 清水 和子, Hilmar Oberst QuickTime™ and a TIFF (LZW) decompressor are needed to see this picture. Makoto Morinaga J. Fujita 藤田 淳一 K. Ueda JF Bisson 植田 憲一 Quic kT ime™ and a T IFF (LZW) dec ompres sor are needed to s ee this pic ture. QuickTime™ TIFF are needed (LZW) decompressor toand seeathis picture. QuickTime™ and a TIFF (LZW) decompressor are needed to see this picture. Center for High Technology Materials, UNM, USA A. Neumann Yu.Kuznetsova QuickTime™ and a TIFF (LZW) decompressor are needed to see this picture. Steve Brueck QuickTime™ and a TIFF (LZW) decompressor are needed to see this picture. Qu i c k Ti m e ™ a n d a TIF F (L Z W) d e c o m p re s s o r a re n e e d e d to s e e th i s p i c tu ATOMIC BOMB QuickTime™ and a TIFF (LZW) decompressor are needed to see this picture. Quic kT ime™ and a T IFF (LZW) dec ompres sor are needed to s ee this pi cture. ATOMIC SKI ATOMIC STAFF ATOMIC PLANT ATOMIC CLOCK QuickT i me™ and a T IFF (LZW) decompressor are needed to see this picture. QuickTime™ and a TIFF (LZW) decompressor are needed to see this picture. ATOMIC FORCE atomic mirror QuickTime™ and a TIFF (LZW) decompressor are needed to see this picture. More atomic staff P.Bertram, H.Merimeche, M.M\"utzel, H.Metcalf, D.Haubrich, D.Meschede, P.Rosenbusch, E.A.Hinds. Magnetic whisperinggallery mirror for atoms. PRA 63, 053405 (2001) Ashok Mohapatra. The same for the normal incidence. (reported here yesterday, 2007) atomic Fresnel zone plate Bruce Doak et al. Towards realization of an atomic de Broglie microscope: helium atom focusing using Fresnel zone plates. PRL 83, p.4230-4232 (1999) atomic lens QuickTime™ and a TIFF (LZW) decompressor are needed to see this picture. V. Balykin, V. Klimov, V. Letokhov. Atom nano-optics. Opt. and Phot. News 16, 44 (2005) What is QUANTUM REFLECTION? Wikipedia: Quantum reflection is a classically counterintuitive phenomenon whereby the motion of particles is reverted "against the force“ acting on them. How about reflection of solitons? Andy Martin. Quantum reflection of solitons and bright solitary waves. Ilya Dodin (Classical analogies of atom manipulation Techniques using laser radiation) also doubts if that he does is Quantum reflection. Perhaps, any counter-intuitive reflection should be called so. Should we call “quantum reflection” any scattering of any wave at any structure? Reflection of oceanic waves from a periodic groin field, is it also quantum reflection? The Zeno effect is Class of phenomena when a transition is suppressed by interaction which allows the interpretation of the final state in terms transition has not yet occurred or transition already occurred. In quantum mechanics, such an interaction is called measurement; its result can be interpreted in terms of classical mechanics. Frequent measurement prohibits the transition. We apply the concept of the Zeno effect to the transition of the atom from the half-space y>0 to the half-space y<0 . Ridges appear as a device that measures, whether the atom already collided with the mirror or not yet. y - position is periodically measured. rate of measurement frequent measurement prohibits the transition. Most of our results are published. D.Kouznetsov, H.Oberst. Reflection of waves from a ridged surface and the Zeno effect. Opt.Rev. 12, p.363-366. (2005) http://www.ils.uec.ac.jp/dima/PAPERS/optrevri.pdf D.Kouznetsov, H.Oberst. Scattering of atomic matter waves from ridged surfaces. PRA 72, 013617 (2005) http://www.ils.uec.ac.jp/~dima/PAPERS/PhysRevA_72_013617.pdf H.Oberst, D.Kouznetsov, K.Shimizu, J.Fujita, F.Shimizu. Fresnel diffraction mirror for an atomic wave. PRL 94, 013203 (2005). http://www.ils.uec.ac.jp/~dima/PAPERS/PhysRevLett_94_013203.pdf D.Kouznetsov, H.Oberst, A.Neumann, Y.Kuznetsova, K.Shimizu, J.-F.Bisson, K.Ueda, S.R.J.Brueck. Ridged atomic mirrors and atomic nanoscope. J.of Physics B 39, p.1605-1623 (2006) http://stacks.iop.org/0953-4075/39/1605 http://www.ils.uec.ac.jp/~dima/PAPERS/nanoscope.pdf quotes: R.Poelsema. G. Comsa. Scattering of thermal energy atoms from disordered surfaces. (Springer-Verlag, 1989) The method based on the thermal energy atom scattering (TEAS), that we are reviewing here, appears to complement in an ideal way scanning tunnel microscopy in the investigation of disordered surfaces. B.Holst, W.Allison. An atom-focusing mirror. Nature, v.390, p.244 (1997). (He atoms, wavelength 0.52 A, spot diameter 210 micron): It follows that a helium microscope with nanometer resolution is possible. A helium atom microscope will be unique non-destructive tool for reflection of transmission microscopy. What is optimal design for the focusing element? F.Shimizu, J.Fujita. Giant Quantum Reflection of Neon Atoms from a Ridged Silicon Surface. J.Phys.Soc. of Japan 71, p.5-8 (2002): The specular reflectivity of slow, metastable neon atoms from a silicon surface was found to increase markedly when the surface was replaced by a grating structure with parallel narrow ridges. The reflectivity was found to increase more than two orders of magnitude at the incident (grazing) angle 10 mrad. Further improvement of the reflectivity at a larger angle will be possible if the width of the ridge and the periodicity are reduced. What is optimal periodicity at given width? How far can be extended the working range of the grazing angle? What resolution of the atom optics imaging system does it correspond? flat mirror potential 4 U( y ) = C / y 4 Depth: From the dimensional reasons, the reflectivity of a flat atomic mirror should be determined by Fit: k=Ks H.Oberst, Y.Tashiro, K.Shimizu, F.Shimizu. Quantum reflection of He* on silicon. PRA, 71, 052901 (2005) F.Shimizu. Specular reflection of very slow metastable neon atoms from a solid surface, PRL 86, 987-990 (2001). Interaction is described with Hermitian potential R H F.Shimizu, J.Fujita. Giant quantum reflection of Ne atoms from a ridged silicon surface J.Phys.Soc. of Japan, 71, p.5-8 (2002) H.Oberst, D.Kouznetsov, K.Shimizu, J.Fujita, F.Shimizu. Fresnel diffraction mirror for an atomic wave. PRL 94, 013203 (2005) estimate the reflectivity of a ridged mirror? Estimate of reflectivity of ridged mirrors with scaling of the van der Waals constant: lg(R) QuickTime™ and a TIFF (LZW) decompressor are needed to see this picture. Ne* atoms, V=3m/s F.Shimizu, J.Fujita. Giant Quantum Reflection of Neon Atoms from a Ridged Silicon Surface J.Phys.Soc. of Japan 71, p.5-8 (2002): B. Mielnik. The screen problem. Foundatons of Phys., 24, p.1113-1129 (1994): “…interpretation of the quantum mechanical wave packet contains a gap.” Can we reflect an object by the intensive observation in a half-space? detectors normal component of velocity frequency of measurement k=K normal component of wavevector ridged mirror C Continuous absorption with rate f = V/L also causes reflection P R photons 0.1 0.01 Reflectivity can be estimated as This estimate ignores width of the ridges and the van der Waals interaction, but agrees with experimental data. Hilmar: Incredible coincidence! Some colleagues were not satisfied with the deduction. The numerical analysis for the idealized ridges can be summarized with fit Such fit overestimates the reflectivity. (PRA,2005) perturbative correction suggests to reduce L to improve the reflection… UNM sample properties of R at large L , small s , Fits Scaling of VWI: Zeno - optical fit (large L ) Perturbative Combined holds in wide range of parameters a=1/4 , b=3 , c=4 Projection of reflectivity to the p, q plane 4 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 3 2 0 < ーLn R < 1 1 < ーLn R < 2 2 < ーLn R < 3 3 < ーLn R < 4 4 < ーLn R < 5 5 < ーLn R < 6 6 < ーLn R < 7 7 < ーLn R < 8 1 all experimental data collected 1 2 q q ーLn R, experiment ーLn R , fit 3 2 1 1 2 p 1 2 p o n Contour of in the K = 6.3/nm , s = 0.005 , w = 317 nm L , plane (He atoms at V=100m/s dashed: o u 0.01 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 in vicinity of optimal R L, There is optimal period at given width of ridges w = 317 nm , V = 100 m/s , s = 0.005 , K=6.3/nm (He, T=1K) R5 = L, micron V=100 m/s nanoscope gives 4.8 Kelvin concentration Pinhole a=100nm, b=1000nm flux small portion reached the focusing element: atoms/second geom.optics, spotsize: wave optics: resulting spotsize: Focusing element COMPETITORS of Atomic Nanoscope optical microscopy (also scanning confocal, and near-field ) electron microscopy (including SEM) probe microscopy: atomic force microscopy electrostatic force microscope magnetic force microscopy scanning capacitance microscopy (Kelvin probe) scanning gate microscopy (also tunneling microscopy) scanning thermal microscopy scanning voltage microscopy (maping of the electric potential) also provide the submicron resolution CONCLUSIUONS R p 1 .1 Rz .01 q Estimate for reflectivity: QuickTime™ and a TIFF (LZW) decompressor are needed to see this picture. -ln R QuickTime™ and a TIFF (LZW) decompressor are needed to see this picture. 1 optimal L at given : 1nm R=0.1 0 0.3 1/2 R ~ exp( - 2 w K 3/4 1/4 ) 1nm L Nanoscope: For He at V=100m/s (T = 1 K), s = 0.005, = 10 nm, R 0.1 limit of resolution of the atom optical imaging system at 20 nm 0 1 p optics. p Atom B. Poelsema, G. Comsa. Scattering of thermal energy atoms from disordered surfaces. 1989) o J. J. Berkhout et al. Quantum reflection: Focusing of hydrogen atoms with(Springer-Verlag, a concave mirror. PRL 63, 1689-1692 (1989) M. Kasevich, D. Weiss, S. Chu. Normal-incidence reflection of slow atoms from an optical evanescent wave. Opt.Lett. 15, 607-9 (1990) E. Hulpke. Helium atom scattering from surfaces. (Springer-Verlag, 1992) D. C. Lau et al. Magnetic mirrors with micron-scale periodicities for slowly moving neutral atoms. J. of Optics B, 371-377 (1999) R. B. Doak et al. Towards Realization of an Atomic deBroglie Microscope: Helium Atom Focusing using Fresnel Zone Plates. PRL 83 , 4229-4232 (1999) D.A.MacLaren, W.Allison. Single crystal optic elements for helium atom microscopy. Rev. of Sci. Instr. 71, p.2625-2634 (2000) M. Drndic et al. Properties of microelectromagnet mirrors as reflectors of cold Rb atoms. PRA 60, 4012 (1999) C. Eltschka, M. J. Moritz, H. Friedrich, Near-threshold quantization and scattering for deep potentials with attractive wells, J. of Physics B 33, 4033-4051 (2000) R. P. Bertram et al.. Magnetic whispering-gallery mirror for atoms. PRA 63, 053405 (2001) A. Pasquini, Y. Shin, C. Sanner, M. Saba, A. Schirotzek, D. E. Pritchard, W. Ketterle. Quantum Reflection from a Solid Surface at Normal Incidence. PRL 93, 223201 (2004) V, Balykin, V. Klimov,V. Letokhov. Atom nano-optics. Opt. and Phot. News 16, 44 (2005) N.P.Robins, A.K.Morrison, J.J.Hope, J.D.Close. Limits to the flux of a continuous atom laser. PRA 72 031606 (2005) several papers are written by my co-authors: H F.Shimizu. Specular reflection of very slow metastable neon atoms from a solid surface, PRL 86, 987-990 (2001). F.Shimizu, J.Fujita. Reflection-type hologram for atoms. PRL 88, 123201 (2002) F. Shimizu, J.Fujita Giant quantum reflection of neon atoms from a ridged silicon surface. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 71, 5-8 (2003) H.Oberst, S.Kasashima, V.I.Balykin, F.Shimizu. Atomic-matter-wave scanner. PRA 68, 013606 (2003) H.Oberst, Y.Tashiro, K.Shimizu, F.Shimizu. Quantum reflection of He* on silicon. PRA, 71, 052901 (2005) S.C.Lee, S.R.J.Brueck. Nanoscale two-positional patterning on Si(001) by large-area interferometric lithography and anisotropic wet etching. J.Vac.Technol.B 22, 1949-52 (2004) H.Oberst, M.Moringa, F.Shimizu, K.Shimizu. One-dimansional focusing of an atomic beam by a flat reflector. Applied Physic B, 86, 801-803 (2003)
© Copyright 2025 ExpyDoc