宇宙におけるプラズマ現象と

Interactions between Galaxies and
Plasmas in Galaxy Clusters
Motivation
牧島一夫
1. How to stop cooling flows
2. How to explain the environmental effects in galaxy morphology and
evoluion
3. How to explain differences between cD and non-cD clusters
4. How to understand the large amount of metals in the intra-cluster
medium (ICM)
Speculations
1. A cD galaxy has its own magnetosphere, while the other galaxies
interact strongly with the ICM
2. The ICM is heated via MHD effects
3. Over tH, galaxies transfer their dynamical energies & ang. momenta to
ICM → fall to the cent, merge, ..
2010/10/12
牧島+中澤研ゼミ
1/10
Three Compnents of a Cluster of Galaxies
《ICM 》
《DM 》
◆
◆
~85% of the total
mass
Subclumps
《galaxies》
◆
◆
◆
2010/10/12
◆
~3% of Mtot
◆
Random motion at
transonic velocitie
Concentrated
◆
牧島+中澤研ゼミ
◆
◆
~12% of Mtot
kTe = 2 ~ 15 keV
Emit only X-rays
Grav. confined, but
most extended
Metallicity~0.3 Z◎
2/10
Motivation 1: Cooling Flow Hypothesis
Cooling ICM flows to the
center, enhancing the colling;
“cooling flow(CF)
ASCA→much smaller
amount of cooled ICM than
predicted
Some mechanism of ICM
heating. Supernave far
insufficient.
A1795
100
CF rate with ASCA (M0 /yr)
In many cluster centers, the
radiative cooling time of ICM
〜 0.1 tH
3A0335
Hydra-A
A496
A2199
Centaurus
10
AWM7
Virgo
1
MKW3s
10
A262
100
CF rate before ASCA (M0 /yr)
Makishima et al. Publ Astr. Soc. Japan 53, 402 (2001)
2010/10/12
牧島+中澤研ゼミ
3/10
Motivation 2: The environmental effects
Butcher-Oemler effect
Numerous disturbed blue galaxies (z>0.5) vs. dwarf spheroidals
(z~0)
Fraction of spirals ↓ toward the cluster center.
SFR may not be the only parameter…
Motivation 3: cD and non-cD clusters
At the center of a cD cluster (a cluster with a central dominant
galaxy), we always observe
- A cool ICM component
- A centrally peaked brightness distribution
- An enhancement in the ICM metallicity
2010/10/12
牧島+中澤研ゼミ
4/10
Motivation 4: Metals in ICM
In a clsuter, ICM is ×3 more massive than stars.
Its metallicity ~ 0.3 solar.
Metals in ICM ~ metals locked in stars (Tsuru 1991).
How this large amount of metals transported to the intracluster space?
2010/10/12
牧島+中澤研ゼミ
5/10
“cD Corona” Conjecture
1. A cD galaxy has cool/metal-rich magnetosphere. Open-field regions
are filled with hot isothermal plasmas.
2. Moving galaxies interact strongly with the ICM → MHD turbulence in
ICM →reconnection→ICM heating
3. Loss of dynamical energies of galaxies →ICM heating → suppression
of CF
4. ICM drag → galaxy infall, galaxy mergers, metamorphosis → Major
origin of the environmental effects
Cool plasma
Hot plasma
Galaxy motion
Mag.field
Reconnection
2010/10/12
牧島+中澤研ゼミ
6/10
Order Estimation
・ Kinetic energy of a galaxy
E = (1/2) Mv2 = 1e60 (M/1011M0)(v/108cm/s) ergs
・ Dynamical friction
-dE/dt = mpnv3πR2 = 5e42 (n/10-3) erg/s
・Time scale of energy loss
τ= E/|dE/dt| 〜 2e17 sec = 0.5 tH
・Kinetic luminosity from moving galaxies
L = Ngal ×|-dE/dt|
2010/10/12
〜 1044 erg/s
牧島+中澤研ゼミ
7/10
Evidence 1a:Cool-Component Morphology
Chandra image of Abell
1795 (Gu et al. 2008).
The metal-enriched
region (red) and the
cool region (contours)
coincide, and exhibit
complex shapes.
2 arcmin ~ 150 kpc.
2010/10/12
牧島+中澤研ゼミ
8/10
Evidence 1b: 2T Nature
Deprojected
thin shells
The Centarus cluster With XMM-Newton (I.
Tkaahashi et al. 2008)
Summed thick shell
1T with gradT
2010/10/12
牧島+中澤研ゼミ
2T view
9/10
Evidence 1c:MHD Simulation
Numerically simulated
lasma temperature (gray)
and magnetic fields
(arrows) in a 300 kpc
squared region. MHD,
radiative cooling, and
thermal conduction are
included.
Asai et al. (2007)
2010/10/12
牧島+中澤研ゼミ
10/10
Evidence 2a. Comet-like Structures
25 kpsc
Fornax Cluster
cD
NGC1399
Chnandra mosaic X-ray image
2010/10/12
companion
NGC1404
牧島+中澤研ゼミ
11/10
Evidence 2b:ICM Heating by Moving Galaxies
Abell 1060
Centaurus cluster
プラズマ温度
Suzaku
Sato et
al. (2007)
XMM,
Takahashi
(2005)
Four giant galaxies at the center
A tyical XD galaxy at the center
20’
20’
X線
2010/10/12
X線
牧島+中澤研ゼミ
12/10
Evidence 2c. Heating and Acceleration
X-ray (contours) and 843 MHz
(grayscale) maps of Abell 3667
(Roettinger et al. 1999)
Suzaku νFν spectrum
(Nakazawa et al. 2008)
In addition to the known ~7
keV emission, a new
component with kT>13 keV
was detected
radio lobes∝ueum
2010/10/12
Stringent U.L. on the inv.Compton hard Xray ∝ueuCMB
→ together with radio, B>2μG
→ mag.press.>0.15gas press.
牧島+中澤研ゼミ
13/10
Evidence 3a: Radial Mass Profiles
1014
Radially integ. M profiles of
Centaurus (M◎)
ICM is more massive than
stars at > 200 kpc
1013
ICM has two phases
1012
Stars more concentrated than
DM
ICM more extended than DM
1011
(Ikebe et al. Astrophys. J., 525,
58, 1999)
1010
20
2010/10/12
50
100
200
3D Radius (kpc)
400
牧島+中澤研ゼミ
14/10
Evidence3b:Possible Galaxy Infall
Iron Mas to Light Ratio
1
10
100 kpc
IMLR (r) = Fe mass in the ICM
within a radius r, divided by
galaxy luminosity therein. -->
Metals in the ICM is much
concentrated (Ikebe et al. 1999;
 Metals expanded ---> unlikely, because
huge amount of energy neede.
 Most of metals locked into stars
--> quantitatively insufficien
 Galaxies must have been falling to the
cluster center
(Makishima et al. 2001; Kawaharada 2006;
Kawaharada et al. 2008; Takahashi et al.
2008)
High z
進化?
Kawaharada 2006).
2010/10/12
Low z
牧島+中澤研ゼミ
15/10
What to do
Observe clusters with various z, and derive
(radially integ. galaxy s. brightness profile)
/(radially integ. ICM mass density profile)
Does this profile evolve ?
Largest difficulty-- membership definition
2010/10/12
牧島+中澤研ゼミ
16/10