Prepared by: Sana Lamtara Bouchra Arrif Outline Introduction I- The Inevitability of Change II- Aspects of Change in Written and Spoken Language a- Examples of Changes in Spoken Language. III- The Conservative Attitude a- Prescriptivism b- Positive aspects of Prescriptivism c- Criticism. d- Aitchison’s Attitudes to Language Change IV- In Favor of Language Change a- Descriptivism b- Criticism of Descriptivism. V- Political Correctness (PC) approach a- Definition b- Historical Background of the approach c- Examples d- Criticism. VI- Language: a political Concern a- Language Policy b- Language Academies c- Example of the French Academy (L'Académie française) Conclusion I- The inevitability of change Change is constant Everything in this universe is perpetually in a state of change. The most colloquial English of several hundred years ago sounds remarkably strange to us. Edmund Spenser speaks of “the ever –whirling wheel of change, the which all mortal things sway” The famous linguist Ferdinand De Saussure noted: “time changes all things: There is no reason why language should escape this universal law.” II- change in spoken and written language Written Language Preserved through rules/standards Institutional and official preservation: Language Academies Kept as conservative and traditional Spoken language Undergoes on-going change Fast change Change happens different levels: Lexicon Phonology Morphology Grammatical Structures at Examples of changes in spoken language Grammatical Structures: The negative form Tu n’as pas dis T’ as pas dis Delete of negation Morphology: Invalid Invaloche Appartment Appart (clipping) Pronunciation: Voila V’là Petit P’tit Lexicon : Franc Voler Trouver Frère Sac femme Dollar Buddy Policeman Balle Peter Décrocher Frangin Keus Meuf Back Friend Cop Verlan Language Original words Words in Verlan language •Femme •Meuf •Méchant •Chan-mé •Musique •Zic-mu •Chouloux •Louches III- The conservative attitude Throughout history, conservatives have been against language change. They wanted to abolish the “intruding” new linguistic changes. They believe in an absolute standard of correctness. Language achieved a measure of excellence that should be maintained. Language should be protected from the ravages of fashion and social trends. Background Lived before the innovation changes(middle aged or older) They are mostly well-educated. They are linguistically conservatives. of linguistic Conservatives consider Language change as: Cruel Sloppy Corruption to language I hope Versus Hopefully I Hope we will arrive in time for lunch. Hopefully, we will arrive in time for lunch. Is repairing Versus is being repaired My car is repairing My car is being repaired Prescriptivism Restricts variation Controls future changes Imposes standardized rules Rejects existing non-standard rules Views non-standard varieties as inferior Positive aspects It standardizes English helps English speakers communicate reliably. around the world to Criticism Prescriptivism concentrates on the technical aspect of the language and discriminates against non-standard forms. Aitchison’s attitudes to language change Aitchison described 3 different attitudes to language change: The crumbling castle: English language is like a beautiful stately home that should be preserved. The Damp spoon syndrome: New forms arise from sheer laziness like dipping a damp spoon into sugar.(lazy speech occurs when muscles aren’t fully functional) The infectious disease: Changes in language are somehow contagious (people pick up new words because they like them). IV- in favor of Language Change Language change is useful and necessary The development of English only fulfils its primary function Language then is a vehicle of expression and communication. Background Generally they are young people. They have grown within language change. They don’t resist change. They accept and are in favor of language development. Positive Aspects of Language Change Language development is viewed because: It serves language as positive Provides ease of communication It is useful Corruption is no longer vAlid… “Corruption” has turned to take a new positive dimension. Example The Corruption of Latin has led to the appearance of new languages: e.g. French, Spanish, … Speakers of these languages consider them as: Natural Rich Beautiful Expressive Descriptivism Attitude of Descriptivism to Language Change Descriptivism views language change as natural. It considers language as something that evolves and adapts: New forms come in Some drop out Other forms remain Key features of Descriptivism Describe forms of variation Present varieties without preference Record change as it happens Avoid interference with change and variation Understand use in context Criticism towards Descriptivism The standard form of language can be negatively affected by the use of non-standard varieties in written publications, school or workplace. Definition Political Correctness is an approach that seeks to reduce and remove the offence caused to particular individuals or groups through prejudice and discrimination. It is believed that language can cause offence and reinforce inequality. Today PC is an undoubted field of language change Historical Background In 1970, with the influence of the feminist movement, PC made gender representation in language its main focus. The PC approach developed in USA and its influence spread later to the UK. By early 1990’s, it was being used as a general tool for “a neutral language” It isn’t restricted only to gender, but it also concerns issues of representation in many social grouping. Examples PC Term Original Term Comments Chairperson Chairman Designed to remove parts of the “generic masculine” problem in English, where the suffix “man” is used to refer to all people in that position but, semantically, excludes the female gender. Ms Miss/Mrs. An alternative title for women, to redress the imbalance of this system which indicates female marital status but not male. herstory history An extreme example in the eyes of many but put forward as a form of positive discrimination by some feminists to counter the appearance of the male pronoun “his” and the symbolic interpretation of the patriarchy of his-story. Hearing impaired deaf A phrase suggested in response to negative connotations that had become associated with wider uses of the word “deaf”. vocationally relocate sack/to fire An example of one of the many satirical words PC coined. Criticism PC was heavily criticized. By the late 1990’s, PC lost much of its credibility Language Policy “Language Policy is what a government does either officially through legislation, court decisions or policy to determine how languages are used, cultivate language skills needed to meet national priorities or to establish the rights of individuals or groups to use and maintain languages.” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Language_policy Institutional Regularization: Language Academies The Role of Language Academies maintain and protect the language fix the language Give a linguistic heritage to all citizens and everyone who speaks that language. Maintain high standards of usage while keeping up with the necessary evolution of Language. These standards are maintained by: The production of the official dictionary, Lexicography. The Recommendation of updates The participation in the creation of new terms. Historical Background The Academy was founded in 1635 by cardinal Richelieu. The bylaws were signed by Louis XIII that same year, and registered with Parliament in 1637. Since then, the job has belonged to the successive kings, emperors, and heads of state of the country. Mission "The primary function of the Académie will be to work, with all possible care and diligence, to give specific rules for our language and make it pure, eloquent, and useful in the arts and science.“ Article 24 of the Bylaws of L'Académie française Members Members of Language Academies always constitute the intellectual elite: Poets Philosophers Doctors Linguists Art critics Heads of state. Clergymen, etc The aim of a varied composition is to provide a wide range of knowledge and culture. Conclusion Why should language change be unavoidable? Bibliography Aitchinson, Jean Language Change: Progress or decay? Cambridge; new York: Cambridge University Press, 2003. Trask, R.L Historical Linguistics. London; New York: Arnold; distributed in the USA by St. Martin’s Press, 1996. Trask, R.L Language Change. London; New York: Routledge, 1994. Web references http://parismus.forum-actif.net/cours-de-francais-f7/le-langage-des-jeunes-francais-le-verlan-t93.htm http://www.nelsonthornes.com/aqagce/A2%20Sample%20material/English/A2_LAN_A.PDF www.bl.uk/learning/langlit/sounds/changing-voices/ http://www.languagea2.bethkemp.co.uk/langechange.html http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Language_policy http://www.academie-francaise.fr/ http://eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/0000019b/80/31/ab/6b.pdf
© Copyright 2024 ExpyDoc