Prompt Photon Production from Proton - proton Collisions at √s = 62.4 GeV in PHENIX ( PHENIX実験における重心系62.4 GeVでの陽子-陽子衝突からの 直接光子の生成断面積の測定 ) JPS meeting March 26th, 2008 26pZF-11 Kohichi Sakashita ( Tokyo Tech ) for the PHENIX Collaboration 1 Contents 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Introduction PHENIX detector and data set Method of prompt photon measurement Result Summary 2 1-1. Introduction • Production of prompt photon proton – Quark - gluon scattering is dominant sub-process at pp collision in s = 62.4 GeV • The related experiment gluon proton quark prompt – PHENIX s = 200 GeV photon – R806, AFS, CCOR and CMOR using ISR collider at s = 63 GeV in CERN • Test the applicability of perturbative QCD (pQCD) – Comparing the cross section of measurement to the one of pQCD calculation • pQCD calculation in qg scattering : d pp(qg)X ˆ qgX dx1 dx2 q(x1) g(x2 ) dpT q(x), g(x) : PDF for quark, gluon ˆ: sub-process cross section – Once the applicable range of pQCD is determined, the framework of pQCD can be used to calculate other quantities of interest, in particular 3 A LL 1-2. Introduction • Double helisity asymmetry ( ALL ) √s = 200 GeV QuickTime™ and a TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor are needed to see this picture. pT xT x s /2 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 xT • Comparing to ALL in 200 GeV, large Bjorken’s x can be reached at 62.4 GeV 4 2. PHENIX Detector and Data Set • PHENIX central arm detector = 90° x 2, || < 0.35 • Data set – 2006 pp run – Integrated luminosity : 0.065 pb-1 • Basic analysis cuts • EMCal&BBC trigger • Vertex cut |z| < 30 cm • Remove 2 edge towers, dead and hot towers – Event selection • pT > 2 GeV/c • Shower shape cut • Charge veto with PC3 Proton beam prompt 5 3-1. Method of Prompt Photon Measurement • Main issue of prompt photon measurement – Evaluation of systematic uncertainties 0 extraction and so on – Prompt photon yields is small signal of all photon • About 10 % at 3 GeV/c 6 3-2. Method of Prompt Photon Measurement Nall – N prompt x A*(1+R)* N tag ’ decay photon – N tag x R* N tag The ratio of ’and 0 production to production The ratio of branching ratio of photon of ’and 0 to the branching ratio of photon of • A = σi σ i : ’ Br i / Br -> decay photon – Detecting two photon ( N tag ) • Reconstruction invariant mass detecting two photon from pi0 decay – Missing one photon missing one photon from pi0 decay • Evaluated by fast MC simulation • The ratio ( R ) of the missing one eta, eta' and omega decay photon photon to detecting two photon prompt photon N prompt = Nall - (1+A)*(1+R)*N tag By measuring Nall and N tag, one can extract small Nprompt signal ( tagging method ) 7 4-1. Result - cross section • Cross section : corr d 3 1 1 N E 3 dp 2pT L pT • pQCD calculation with NLO and CTEQ6M PDF agrees with experiment within theoretical uncertainty and experimental uncertainty QuickTime™ and a TIFF (LZW) decompressor are needed to see this picture. 8 4-2. Result - comparison of PHENIX √s = 200 GeV and ISR experiments Open black circle : PHENIX at √s = 200 GeV ( 2005 year ) The others : ISR experiments at √s = 63 GeV QuickTime™ and a TIFF (LZW) decompressor are needed to see this picture. • Results of ISR agree with this result within the experimental uncertainty • Cross section slope at √s = 200 GeV is gentler than one at √s = 62.4 GeV 9 5. Summary • Test the applicability of pQCD calculation • Data set – pp collision at 2006 year s = 62.4 GeV – Integrated luminosity : 0.065 pb-1 • Prompt photon yields as a function of pT are extracted by the 0 tagging method ( N prompt = Nall - (1+A)*(1+R)*N tag ) with PHENIX central arm detector ( = 90° x 2, || < 0.35 ) • pQCD calculation with NLO and CTEQ6M PDF agrees with experiment within theoretical uncertainty and experimental uncertainty • Results of ISR agree with this result within the experimental uncertainty 10 Back up 11 • Main issue of prompt photon measurement – Evaluation of systematic uncertainties 0 extraction and so on – Prompt photon yields is small signal of all photon Prompt photon / All photon 3-1. Method of Prompt Photon Measurement QuickTime™ and a TIFF (LZW) decompressor are needed to see this picture. 12 4. Result - systematic errors • Error in N tag – Fit ( Gauss + pol.3 ) to the region of pi0 mass peak to extract 0 photon with 3 ( 105 < M < 165MeV/c2 ) – Difference of between N tag with pol.2 and N tag with pol.3 and between N tag with 3 and N tag with 4 is assigned as the error QuickTime™ and a TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor are needed to see this picture. – 3.4 % to the N tag with pol.3 and 3at 2 GeV/c 2.8 % to the N tag with pol.3 and 3 at 3.75 GeV/c 13 corr N N prom pt acceptance energysm ering conversion BBCtrigger EMCaltrigger corr d 3 1 1 N E 3 dp 2pT L dpT 14 4. Result - systematic errors W = prompt / inclusive Error of C is scaled by 1/W - 1 Error in 1+A Neutral hadron contamination Dalitz decay pi0 partner photon conversion loss Secondary origin Error in Ntag QuickTime™ and a TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor are needed to see this picture. Energy scale uncertainty 1+R (acceptance) Luminosity uncertainty Conversion error BBC bias uncertainty 1+R (Minimum E cut) 1+R (Pi0 cross section slope) QuickTime™ and a TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor are needed to see this picture. 15 GS-C, ΔG = 1 present x-range GS-C x 16
© Copyright 2024 ExpyDoc