Intercomaparison of reanalyses, JRA25, NCEP/NCAR and ERA40 with emphasis on their application to driving CTM T. Iwasaki, H. Hamada and K. Miyazaki䟼 Tohoku University 䟼JAMSTEC Plan for reanalysis of minor constituents Ozone reanalysis will be performed with a CTM driven by atmospheric reanalysis. In this system, quality of reanalyzed minor constituents is affected by quality of the atmospheric reanalyses used for driving the CTM. This work 1. To compare the mean-meridional circulation of three reanalyses, JRA-25, ERA40 and NCEP/NCAR. 2. To compare reanalyzed ozone distributions and their mean and eddy meridional transports. Kazutoshi ONOGI䚭et al. (JMA) JRA-25 Overview • Joint research project of JMA and CRIEPI • Years䠌1979.1 - 2004.12 transitioned to JMA-CDAS (JCDAS) for after 2005 • Resolution : T106L40 with top level at 0.4hPa • 3D-Var • Version : JMA operational system as of April 2004 In addition, SSM/I PW, TOVS radiance level 1c(SSU) and 1d(HIRS, MSU) were assimilated. • JRA-25 original/firstly used observational data TCR, SSM/I snow coverage, digitized Chinese snow depth data, reprocessed GMS-AMV • JRA-25 original boundary/forcing data Daily COBE SST and sea ice (Ishii 2005, IJC), daily 3D-ozone profile Globally-averaged Monthly Precipitation Courtesy: H. Koide Correlation of Monthly Precipitation with GPCPv2 SSM/I PW assimilated Courtesy: H. Koide Global Temperature Anomaly Anomaly from averaged temperature of each level for each reanalysis Courtesy: J. Tsutsui and M. Sakamoto 㻧㻭㻩㻃㻷㼕㼒㼓㼒㼖㼓㼋㼈㼕㼈㻋㻔㻓㻓㻓㻐㻔㻓㻓㼋㻳㼄㻌 <JRA> <ERA> ⦃ᗐ[°] ⦃ᗐ[°] Hadley Cirulation : ERA>JRA>NCEP <NCEP> Mass stream functions (*1e+11[kg/s]) 500hPa㟻 JRA ERA NCEP 㻭㻭㻤㻃㻷㼕㼒㼓㼒㼖㼓㼋㼈㼕㼈㻋㻔㻓㻓㻓㻐㻔㻓㻓㼋㻳㼄㻌 <JRA> <ERA> Hadley Circulation: JRA=ERA>NCEP ⦃ᗐ[°] ⦃ᗐ[°] <NCEP> Mass Streamfunction (*1e+11[kg/s]) 500hPa㟻 JRA ERA NCEP Precipitation (1979-2001)[mm/day] DJF JJA Seasonal Variations Max and Min of Mass Streamfunction at 500 hPa 䚭JRA e+11(kg/s) 䚭ERA 䚭NCEP Solid䠌NH Broken䠌SH month • JRA=ERA>NCEP in SH winter • ERA>JRA>NCEP in NH winter • SH winter > NH winter Inter annual variability of Hadley circulation SH-JJA 10E+11(kg/s) NH-DJF year •Max 䟹Min of Mass Streamfunction at 500hPa 䚭䚭JRA 䚭䚭ERA 䚭䚭NCEP DJF: NH Hadley circulations are gradually strengthened. Inter-annual variability is strongly correlated among analyses. JJA: No trend is found in SH winter. Poor correlation of inter-annual variability among analyses. 㻧㻭㻩㻝㻃㻶㼗㼕㼄㼗㼒㼖㼓㼋㼈㼕㼈㻋㻔㻓㻓㻐㻔㻓㼋㻳㼄㻌 <JRA> <ERA> ⦃ᗐ[°] B-DCirculation䠌 <NCEP> ERA>JRA=NCEP ⦃ᗐ[°] JRA ERA NCEP 100hPa Mass Streamfunction (*1e+10[kg/s]) JRA䠄䠇 NCEP䟿JRA25 DJF ERA䟿JRA25 㻭㻭㻤㻝㻃㻶㼗㼕㼄㼗㼒㼖㼓㼋㼈㼕㼈㻋㻔㻓㻓㻐㻔㻓㼋㻳㼄㻌 <JRA> <ERA> B-DCirculation䠌ERA>JRA=NCEP <NCEP> JRA ERA NCEP 100hPa Mass Streamfunction (*1e+10[kg/s]) Seasonal Variations Max and Min of Mass Streamfunction at 100 hPa 䚭JRA 䚭ERA 䚭NCEP Solid䠌NH Broken䠌SH month 䝿Downward mass flux integrated over hemispheres at 100 hPa 䝿Amplitude of Seasonality: ERA>JRA,NCEP 䝿NH winter 䠐SH winter Inter annual variability of T-S mass exchange NH: DJF year •Max 䟹Min of Mass Streamfunction at 100hPa No significant trend. Poor correlation among analyses. SH: JJA 䚭䚭JRA 䚭䚭ERA 䚭䚭NCEP Mean-Meridional Circulation 1. Hadley circulation is: ERA>JRA>NCEP. This may be due to precipitation neat the ITCZ. 2. In NH winter, the Hadley circulation has increasing trends and good correlations among the reanalyses. 3. Midlatitude-tropospheric circulation is almost even in all. 4. BD circulation (downward mass flux at 100hPa) is ERA>JRA>NCEP. But we do not find a strong relationship with EP flux divergence. 5. Stratospheric analysis does not show significant trends or correlations but suffers from biases of satellite data. Ozone reanalysis with a CTM driven by the atmospheric reanalysis (1993-1994) CTM is driven by T42L68-AGCM and the GCM is nudged to the reanalyses with appropriate relaxation times. No chemical data is assimilated so as to see the transport characteristics in detail. Transport diagnosis is made based on mass-weighted isentropic zonal means. Definition of Zonal Mean State Mass-weighted isentropic zonal means are taken for all variables, to express the lower boundary conditions and nongeostrophic and finiteamplitude effects of waves. Zonal Means Eddies A( y,* ,t )* ) A# " A ! A* ' (p 1 A ( x , y , * , t ) % ! Lx & (* (p$ "dx (* # ( AB)* = A*" B*!( A'B')* Correlations Isentropic zonal mean pressure is used as the vertical coordinates. Ԫ The thermodynamic equation is prognostic while the continuity equation is daignostic. Vertical Coordinate (isentropic zonal mean pressure) In the zonal averaging, we set p† ! p p ( x) = ps ( x) for ! s (x) < ! Logarithmic Pressure Coordinate z† ( " ! H log p† / p00 ) Formulation of the zonal mean transport equation The mass-weighting is also considered for the mixing ratio of minor constituent as well as the mean meridional circulation. The transport equation helps us to express the conservation of minor constituents including the lower boundary condition. Zonally symmetric transport equation: Mean transport Time derivation of mass mixing ratio Eddy transport Chemical production/loss Formulation of the zonal mean transport equation Mean transport flux Eddy transport flux The vertical component of eddy transport term can be separated into the contributions due to adiabatic and diabatic processes. For adiabatic processes, the direction of eddy becomes This infers that the eddy flux is parallel to the local isentropic surface for adiabatic processes. DJF Mean ozone transport JJA 䜮䝂䝷䝙䝭䝇䜳䜽 DJF Eddy ozone transport JJA Ozone mixing ratio Contours int.: 1ppmv UARS Clim. (JAN) CTM JRA25 (JAN, 1994) UARS Clim. (JUL) CTM JRA25 (JUL,1994) Ozone mixing ratio in Jan. 1994 Contours int.: 1ppmv CTM: NCEP1 CTM: NCEP2 CTM: JRA25 CTM: ERA40 Ozone mixing ratio in Jul. 1994 Contours int.: 1ppmv CTM: NCEP1 CTM: NCEP2 CTM: JRA25 CTM: ERA40 Ozone mixing ratio in Jan. 1994 DIFF(NCEP1-JRA25) DIFF(NCEP2-JRA25) Contours int.: 0.1ppmv DIFF(ERA-JRA25) L Ozone mixing ratio in Jul. 1994 DIFF(NCEP1-JRA25) DIFF(NCEP2-JRA25) DIFF(ERA-JRA25) Seasonal variation of Total ozone in 1994 OBS: UARS CTM: JRA25 Contours int.: 20DU Total ozone in 1994 CTM: NCEP1 CTM: JRA Contours int.: 20DU CTM: NCEP2 CTM: ERA40 Total ozone in 1994 CTM: JRA25 Contours int.: 20DU DIFF(NCEP2-JRA25) DIFF(NCEP1-JRA25) DIFF(ERA40-JRA25) Contours int.: 3DU Mean meridional ozone fluxes ingerated through the atmosphere (kg/s) CTM: JRA25 DIFF(NCEP2-JRA25) Contours int.: 500 DIFF(NCEP1-JRA25) DIFF(ERA40-JRA25) Contours int.: 100 Eddy meridional ozone fluxes ingerated through the atmosphere (kg/s) CTM: JRA25 DIFF(NCEP2-JRA25) Contours int.: 300 DIFF(NCEP1-JRA25) DIFF(ERA40-JRA25) Contours int.: 100 Meridional ozone fluxes ingerated in the troposphere and stratosphere (kg/s) Mean: Stratosphere (Kg/s) Mean: Troposphere NCEP1 NCEP2 ERA JRA Eddy: Stratosphere Eddy: Troposphere DJF Meridional ozone fluxes ingerated in the troposphere and stratosphere (kg/s) Mean: Stratosphere (Kg/s) Mean: Troposphere NCEP1 NCEP2 ERA JRA Eddy: Stratosphere Eddy: Troposphere JJA Summary 1. Ozone mixing ratio obtained with JRA25 is greater than those with ERA and NCEP in the lower stratosphere, while it is less in the middle stratosphere. The mixing ratio in the lower stratosphere may be the main reason why the extratropical total ozone is the largest when CTM is run with JRA25. 2. Vertically integrated net poleward mean transport with JRA25 is greater than NCEP and a little greater than ERA. 3. Vertically integrated net equatorward eddy transport with JRA25 is greater than NCEP but a little smaller than ERA. 4. Reanalyzed ozone has some biases and requires further improvements of CTM and the atmospheric reanalyses. Announcement The 3rd WCRP Reanalysis Conference To be held in Tokyo in January, 2008 Stream function in July & August CTM: JRA25 DIFF(NCEP2-JRA25) Contours int.: 500 DIFF(NCEP1-JRA25) DIFF(ERA40-JRA25) Contours int.: 100 Stream function in January & February CTM: JRA25 DIFF(NCEP2-JRA25) Contours int.: 500 DIFF(NCEP1-JRA25) DIFF(ERA40-JRA25) Contours int.: 100 Objective Analysis Analysis JRA-25 Resolution Period 2.5°×2.5° 23 (upto 0.4hPa) NCEP/NCAR 2.5°×2.5° 17 (upto 10hPa) ERA-40 2.5°×2.5° 23(upto 1hPa) 1979䡐2001 JRA: 23layers: 1000 925 850 700 600 500 400 300 250 200 150 100 70 50 30 20 10 7 5 3 2 1 0.4 NCEP&NCEP2: 17layers: 1000 925 850 700 600 500 400 300 250 200 150 100 70 50 30 20 10 ERA: 23layers: 1000 925 850 775 700 600 500 400 300 250 200 150 100 70 50 30 20 10 7 5 3 2 1 2. MRI/JMA ozone reanalysis system Meteorological fields To reproduce the meteorological field observed, Reanalysis data is assimilated into the GCM with a nudging technique. ERA 40 Data assimilation is reanalysis not applied to chemical data species. 4-D assimilation systemof for GCM Thus, distributions chemical species are calculated in the CTM. Chemical species Chemical processes TOMS ozone data Sedimentation & emission Total ozone assimilation Transports CTM GCM MRI chemical transport model An ozone reanalysis system is being developed based on the CTM driven by MRI/JMA 98 GCM (Shibata et al., 2005). 䝿Long lived chemical species : 34 species N2O, Ox, CH4, H2O, NOy, HNO3, N2O5, Cly, CO, CO2, AEROSOLS, HO2NO2, NOx, ClONO2, ClOx, HOCl, Cl2, ClNO2, Cl2O2, CCl4, OClO, H2O2, HBr, BrONO2, HOBr, HCl, BrOx, N2O, CFCl3, CF2Cl2, Bry, CH3Cl, CH3Br, CF2ClBr, CF3Br, 䝿Short lived chemical species : 15 species O(1D), O(3P), O3, OH, HO2, H, N, NO, NO2, NO3, Cl, ClO, Br, BrO, BrCl 䝿Chemical reactions 䠌 Photolysis䟺23䟻䚮Heterogeneous(5:PSC䚮2:SSA䟻䚮 Gas phase䟺59䟻: Ox group(5), HOx group(12), NOx group(11), Clx group(21), Brx group(9), Hydrocarbon group(1) 䝿Resolution䠌 T42 with 68 levels䟺Surface 䡐 0.01 hPa䟻 MRI ozone reanalysis system GCM CTM (Nudging) Model run TIME 00 obs 06 obs 12 obs 18 obs 00 obs obs :ERA40 Reanalysis data Data assimilation technique A data assimilation technique based on simple Newtonian relaxation called the nudging technique (Hoke and Anthes, 1976) is used to force the GCM toward the reanalysis data. The prognostic equation is given by GCM forcing term Relaxation term Horizontal and vertical wind 䊲㻃Transport Temperature, humidity 䊲㻃Chemistry Meridional circulation Mass stream function (*1e+11 [kg/s]) Hadley circulation B-D circulation DJF DJF JJA JJA JRA-25 ERA-40 NCEP/NCAR zonal mean at 500hPa zonal mean at 100hPa Courtesy: H. Hamada & T. Iwasaki (Tohoku Univ.) QBO and SAO 10S-10N averaged zonal wind cross section Courtesy: H. Hatsushika Surface temperature Trend JRA-25 and ERA-40 Global Temperature Anomaly JRA-25, ERA-40, CRU(Jones) Top : monthly mean, Bottom : 5-year moving avarage Distribution of tendency (K/decade) Courtesy: J. Tsutsui Comparison of ozone and temperature of JRA-25 and ERA-40 Ozone density is dominant for climate in the stratosphere. Global averaged Total column ozone (DU) Earth Probe Nimbus-7 TOMS Sudden increase from 1989 to 1991 in ERA-40 Ozone in JRA-25 is unstable for the period without TOMS data from May 1993 to July 1996 El chichon Pinatubo Courtesy: M. Sakamoto 䜄䛮䜇 • ᅂJRA-25්よᯊ䝋䞀䝃䛴Ꮔ༔㟻ᚘ⎌䛴Ẓ㍉䛴 䛥䜇よᯊ䛱p†᪁⛤ᘟ⣌䜘⏕䛊䚮NCEP/NCAR䝿ERA40්よᯊ䝋䞀䝃䛮Ẓ㍉䜘⾔䛩䛥䚯 Ꮔ༔㟻ᚘ⎌䛴Ẓ㍉ ㈻㔖Ὦ⥲㛭ᩐ䛴 ᙁ䛛 ᖳ䚱ንິ Ꮢ⟿ንິ DJFᑊὮᅥ (䝿䝓䝍䝰䞀ᚘ⎌) ERA>JRA>NCEP JJAᑊὮᅥ (༞䝿䝓䝍䝰䞀ᚘ⎌) ERA䍝JRA>NCEP ┞㛭䛵䛕䛰䛊 JRA䛴䜅ᘽ䜄䜑䝌䝰䝷䝍 DJFᠺᒒᅥ (䝿B-Dᚘ⎌) ERA>JRA=NCEP ERA䍝JRA>NCEP ┞㛭䛵䛊䚯䛵䛩䛓䜐䛮 䛝䛥䝌䝰䝷䝍䛵ぜ䜏䜒䛰䛊 JJAᠺᒒᅥ (༞䝿B-Dᚘ⎌) ERA>JRA=NCEP ┞㛭䛵䛊䚯JRA䝿 NCEP䛵ᙁ䜄䜑䝌䝰䝷䝍 ┞㛭䛵㧏䛊 ᙁ䜄䜑䝌䝰䝷䝍 ERA>JRA=NCEP 䌲 ERA>JRA=NCEP 䌳 ERA䍝JRA>NCEP Stream function in January & February CTM: NCEP1 CTM: JRA Contours int.: 20DU CTM: NCEP2 CTM: ERA40 Contours int.: 3DU Stream function in July & August CTM: NCEP1 CTM: JRA Contours int.: 20DU CTM: NCEP2 CTM: ERA40 Contours int.: 3DU ᖈ≟ᖲᆍ䛱䛪䛊䛬 ࡌ࡙ࡡንᩐ࡞ᑊࡊ࡙㈻㔖㔔ࡲࡄࡊࡒᖈ≟ᖲᆍࢅࡵࡔ࠷ࡒࠊᖈ ≟ᖲᆍࡡᏽ⩇ࡢ ࡡࡻ࠹࡞⾪ࡈࡿࡾࠊ㕼├㟻࡞ࡢ➴Ὼన㟻࡞Ἒࡖ࡙ᖈ≟ᖲᆍࡊࡒẴ Ὼࢅ⏕࠷ࡾࠊ ࡐࡡ≁ᚡࡢᆀ⾦㢴㎾జࢅ⏕࠷࠷࡚ἴິᖲᆍὮ┞பష⏕ࡡ⾪⌟ ྊ⬗࡚࠵ࡽࠉࡱࡒୖ㒂ሾ⏲ࢅḿࡊࡂ⾪⌟࡚ࡀࡾࡆ࡛࡚࠵ࡾࠊ 䝿➴Ὼన㟻䛭᮶こᖲᆍሔ䛱䜎䜑Ꮔ༔㟻ᚘ⎌䛴䝥䝮䝇䝌 䠃䠀䝭䜴䝭䝷䜼䝩Ⓩ䛰Ꮔ༔㟻ᚘ⎌䛒ᚋ䜏䜒䜑䛥䜇䚮⇍㍲㏞䝿∸㈻ ㍲㏞䜘⩻䛎䜑୕䛭ฺ᭯ 䠄䠀ἴິ䛱䜎䜑㐘ິ㔖㍲㏞䛴ຝᯕ䜘㐲ว䛱䛎䜑 㜾Ềฦᕱ(82ᖳJJA) <JRA> <NCEP> • JRA䛒NCEP䛱Ẓ䛿㜾Ề䛒ᙁ䛕⾪⌟䛛䜒䚮䜄䛥ITCZ 䛒⾪⌟䛛䜒䛬䛊䜑䚯 㜾Ềฦᕱ(98JJA) <JRA> <NCEP> • JRA䛵82ᖳ䛱Ẓ䛿ITCZ䛒ᘽ䛊 㜾Ềฦᕱ(82D~83JF) <JRA> <NCEP> • JJA䛱Ẓ䛿ᘽ䛊䚯䜄䛥ฦᕱ䛵JRA䛮NCEP 䛭జ㏳䛩䛬䛊䜑䚯 㜾Ềฦᕱ(97D~98JF) <JRA> <NCEP> • JRA䛮NCEP䛴ฦᕱ䛵జ㏳䛩䛬䛊䜑䚯 • 82D~83JF䛮Ẓ䛿㜾Ềᙁᗐ䛒ᙁ䛕䛰䛩䛬䛊䜑䛮䛵Ử䛝 䛬ゕ䛎䛰䛊䛑䠑 ➴Ὼన㟻୕䛭䛴᮶こᖲᆍሔ ! Ὼనθ䛴➴Ὼన㟻୕䛭䛴᮶こᖲᆍሔ䜘䚭䚭ᖲᆍሔ䛑䜏䛴೩ᕣ䜘 !' !'= 0 䚭䚭䛭⾪䛟䛮䚭䚭䚭䚭䚭䛭ᣉᩋ䛒䛰䛊䛴䛭⇍ງᏕ䛴ᘟ䛵 * '(* '(* '(* & Q # + v* + w* =$ ! 't 'y 'z % ) " A* = "p /"! " p /"! ⛛Ὦ䟺✭Ẵም⮤㌗䛒ິ䛕䟻 ฆ⤎䚮ᨲᑏ➴䛱䜎䜑አ 㒂䛑䜏䛴ຊ⇍䚮෫༴ 䝿➴Ὼన㟻䛭᮶こᖲᆍሔ䛱䜎䜑Ꮔ༔㟻ᚘ⎌䛴䝥䝮䝇䝌 䠃䠀䝭䜴䝭䝷䜼䝩Ⓩ䛰Ꮔ༔㟻ᚘ⎌䛒ᚋ䜏䜒䜑䛥䜇䚮⇍㍲㏞ 䚭䚭∸㈻㍲㏞䜘⩻䛎䜑୕䛭ฺ᭯ 䠄䠀ἴິ䛱䜎䜑㐘ິ㔖㍲㏞䛴ຝᯕ䜘㐲ว䛱䛎䜑 A ୯㧏⦃ᗐ䝿ᠺᒒᅥ䛭䛴ἴິ䛱䜎䜑ᚘ⎌䛴㥉ິ 㻨㻳㻃㼉㼏㼘㼛䟺ἴິ䛒㐘䛼㐘ິ㔖䟻 & & '+ * F * $ ( (u )v)) ,( p$ $ % 'x % # #! !! "" ᮶こ᪁ྡྷ䛴㐘ິ᪁⛤ᘟ #u * # u* # u* + v* + w* " f v* = !!F #t #y #z ἴ䛒㐘䛼㐘ິ㔖䛴 ᮨ䝿Ⓠᩋ ㏻⤾䟺㈻㔖ಕᏋ䟻䛴ᘟ * * !v "1 !# 0 w + #0 =0 !y !z
© Copyright 2024 ExpyDoc