1 of 4 - High Court

1 of 4
Print
Wednesday the 14th January 2015
ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR(JUDICIAL)
DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR WEDNESDAY 14/01/2015
(AT 10:30 A.M.)
(THIS CAUSE LIST IS PUBLISHED UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE)
No
Case No
1.
MAC/1336/2014
L.T.
Party Detail
Pet Adv
Res Adv
FRESH MATTERS
TULARAM SAHU
JYOTI RATHORE
VS. SMT. ASHWINI BAI &
MALAY SHRIVASTAVA
ORS.
APURVA THAKUR,
GAGAN TIWARI
[ FOR DEFAULT OF : 1. APPEAL IS BARRED BY 190 DAYS.]
Remarks
1
2.
WP227/885/2014
1
3.
WPC/2566/2014
1
4.
WPC/1310/2013
3
5.
WPS/6704/2014
1
BALOD
AXIS BANK LIMITED
BHASKAR PAYASHI
YOGESH
VS. M/S. RAGHUNATH
ROHITASHVA SINGH
PANDE(CAVT.),RICHA
ROLLING MILL & ORS.
PANDEY(CAVT.)
[ ON DEFAULT OF - (1) COURT FEE OF RS. 5/- IS NOT AFFIXED IN CERTIFIED COPY. (2) PAGE
NO. 35 IS NOT LEGIBLE. ][ ALONGWITH CAVT. NO. 992/14 ]
A.G.
ANURAG KHATRI
RAMCHARAN
VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH RENU KOCHAR
ARUN KOCHAR
& ORS.
RAVI KUMAR BHAGAT
[ ON DEFAULT OF : 1. AGE OF PETITIONER WRONGLY MENTIONED IN THE AFFIDAVIT. (2)
COUNSEL FOR PETITIONER NOT FILED AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF AN APPL. FOR STAY / INTERIM
RELIEF. ]
DEFAULT MATTERS
SHIVNANDAN GUPTA AND ORS. BALDAU PRASAD
VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH BANJARE
AND ORS.
HAMIDA SIDDIQUI
A.G.
ABHISHEK THAKUR,
SMT. PUJA THAKUR,
SHASHANK THAKUR
[ FOR ORDERS ON DEFAULT EXEMPTION APPLICATION FILED FOR EXEMPTION ON PAGE NO. 67, 71,
73 & 79 ARE FAINT COPY AS PER CHECKERS REPORT DATED 09.01.2015 ]
NAND KISHOR RATHOUR
(N.K.RATHOUR)
VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
AND ORS.
[ ON DEFAULT OF - (1) PAGE NO. 15
24.12.2014 ]
AMIT KUMAR SHARMA
ANSHUL
R.SHRIVASTAVA
A.G.
AND 24 NOT READABLE AND AR [J] ORDER DATED
6.
CRR/956/2014
AMOSH JIWAN
PUNIT RUPAREL
VS. SMT. HELSA
[ FOR ORDERS ON DEFAULTS AS PER OFFICE NOTE DTD. 17/12/2014 ]
7.
CRR/962/2014
TILAKRAM DARRO @ KUMAR
RAKESH THAKUR
A.G.
VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH SHASHI BHUSAN
TIWARI
[ FOR ORDERS ON DEFAULTS AS PER OFFICE NOTE DTD. 18/12/2014 ]
1
BILASPUR
1
KANKER
2 of 4
8.
CRR/963/2014
ANKIT DANI
MADHULIKA JHA
A.G.
VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
DURG
AND ORS.
[ FOR ORDERS ON DEFAULT NO. 3, 4, 6 AND 7 AS POINTED OUT BY THE OFFICE NOTE DTD.
19/12/2014 ]
9.
CRR/976/2014
1
10.
CRR/980/2014
Y.C.SHARMA
A.G.
VIVEK RATHORE
M.ASHA
AJAY CHANDRA
[ FOR ORDERS ON DEFAULT AS PER OFFICE NOTE DTD. 24/12/2014 ]
11.
MCRC/7028/2014
1
MANOJEET KUMAR MUKHERJI
SHIVENDU PANDYA
VS. SMT. CHHANDA MUKHERJI
[ FOR ORDERS ON DEFAULT AS PER OFFICE NOTE DTD. 23/12/2014 ]
1
RAMDAS AGRAWAL
VS. JASBIR SINGH & ORS.
RAMPRASAD
ADITYA KHARE
A.G.
VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH T.K.TIWARI
MOHD. TARIQ HAIDER
[ ON DEFAULT OF- 1. CERTIFIED COPY OF ORDER NOT FILED. ]
RAIPUR
RAIPUR
1
KORBA
12.
MCRC/7126/2014
PRAMOD GUPTA
PARAG KOTECHA
A.G.
KORIYA
VS. THE STATE OF
ALOK TIWARI
(BAIKUNTHPUR)
CHHATTISGARH
[ FOR ORDERS ON FILING OF DOCUMENTS AFTER STIPULATED TIME REGARDING THE DEFAULT ]
13.
MCRC/7160/2014
KRIPAL SINGH RAJPUT
SUNIL SAHU
A.G.
BILASPUR
VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
[ ON DEFAULT OF- 1. MEMO OF APPEARANCE NOT SIGNED BY SHRI SUNIL SAHU, ADVOCATE. ]
14.
CRMP/704/2014
1
15.
CRMP/786/2014
1
1
1
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
JANJGIRVS. PUSHPARAJ SINGH @
A.G.
CHAMPA
GHANSHYAM
[ FOR ORDERS ON DEFAULT OF : 1. RESP. NAME COMPLETELY NOT MENTIONEDE IN INDEX,
SYNOPSIS AND CONDONATION OF DELAY APPLICATION. 2. AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF APPL. FOR
CONDONATION OF DELAY NOT FILED. 3. DAYS OF DELAY NOT MENTIONED IN APPL. FOR DELAY
APPLICATION. 4. COMPUTER SHEET NOT FILLED. 5. U/S. AQUITTAL APPEAL COMPLETELY NOT
MENTIONED IN SYNOPSIS, PARA NO. 1 OF LEAVE TO APPEAL, CAUSE TITLE OF ACQUITAL APPEAL
PARA NO. 2 OF ACQUITTAL APPEAL & PARA NO. 1 OF APPL. FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY
APPLICATION. 6. PARA NO. WRONGLY MENTIONED IN LEAVE TO APPEAL APPLICATION. 7. COPY OF
OTHER RELAVENT EXHIBITED DOCUMENTS NOT FILED. 8. COPY OF STATEMENTS OF P.W.S. NOT
FILED.] {U/S 378 DB}
SMT.SAVITA BAI
VS. CHANDRABHUSHAN
[ ON DEFAULT OF- 1. PARTICULARS &
2. CERTIFICATE NOT FILED WITH THE
WRONGLY MENTIONED IN PARA NO. 01,
R.S.BAGHEL
BILASPUR
PAGE NO. COMPLETELY NOT MENTIONED IN INDEX COLUMN.
CASE. 3. ANNEX. NOT MARKED IN PAGE NO. 04. 4. DT.
CAUSE TITLE. ]
16.
CRMP/880/2014
1
SANJAY KUMAR DUBEY
BHARAT RAJPUT
A.G.
JANJGIRVS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
CHAMPA
AND ORS.
[ ON DEFAULT OF- 1. COPY OF PROCEEDINGS NOT FILED. 3. JMFC. MADE PARTY. ]
17.
CRMP/979/2014
1
18.
CRMP/1016/2014
GULAB CHAND SAHU
YOGESH PANDEY
A.G.
VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH RICHA PANDEY
RAIPUR
AND ANR.
RAKESH THAKUR
[ ON DEFAULT OF- 1. TYPED COPY OF HAND WRITTEN ANNEX. P/2 & ANNEX. P/6 NOT FILED. 2.
COPY OF CRIMINAL PROCEEDING & COPY OF CHALLAN NOT FILED. ]
DR. ASHOK JOHN
JITENDRA GUPTA
MUNGELI
VS. DR. ANIL HENRY & ORS. SUNIL VERMA
[ ON DEFAULT OF- 1. APP. FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY WITH AFFIDAVIT NOT FILED. ]
1
3 of 4
19.
CRMP/1037/2014
SANJAY PATEL
SURESH KUMAR VERMA
JANJGIRJITENDRA
CHAMPA
SHRIVASTAVA
[ ON DEFAULT OF- 1. COPY OF COMPLAINT, COPY OF STATEMENTS & OTHER EXHIBITED RELEVANT
DOCUMENT NOT FILED. 2. CERTIFICATE NOT FILED. ]
20.
CRMP/1053/2014
HARI KHANDELWAL
AWADH TRIPATHI
A.G.
VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH INDIRA TRIPATHI
RAIPUR
WASIM MIYAN
[ ON DEFAULT OF- 1. TYPED COPY OF HAND WRITTEN OF PAGE NO. 24 TO 35 & 39 NOT FILED. ]
21.
CRMP/1071/2014
BALVINDAR SINGH SAINI @
Y.C.SHARMA
A.G.
GAGGI
VIVEK RATHORE
RAIPUR
VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH M.ASHA
AJAY CHANDRA
[ ON DEFAULT OF- 1. COPY OF PROCEEDING OF CRI. CASE NO. 332/13 NOT FILED. ]
22.
CRMP/1108/2014
SMT.MONA GUPTA
SHAILENDRA SHUKLA
VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH A.SEN GUPTA
AND ORS.
RITU MISHRA
AMRITA DEWANGAN
[ ON DEFAULT OF- 1. PAGE NOS. 25 & 26 FILED AS TWICE
140 NOT LEGIBLE COPY & ITS TYPED COPY ALSO NOT FILED
DATE NOT MENTIONED IN MEMO OF PETITION CERTIFICATE &
1
BHARTIYA SAMRIDHHI
FINANCE LTD.
VS. VIJAY KANT KHUNTE
1
1
1
A.G.
RAIPUR
WITH THE PETITION. 2. PAGE NO.
COMPLETELY WITH THE PETITION. 3.
APPLICATION FOR STAY. ]
23.
CRMP/1112/2014
GANESHCHANDRA PAL
SUNIL VERMA
RAIPUR
VS. SUNIL AGRAWAL & ANR. JITENDRA GUPTA
[ ON DEFAULT OF - 2. CERTIFIED COPY OF ORDER DT. 05/09/2014 NOT FILED WITH THE CASE,
BUT FILED WITH THE CASE, BUT FILED PHOTO COPY FILED. 3. PAGE NOS. 10 TO 17 & 29 ARE
HAND WRITTEN DOCUMENT & TYPED COPY OF THE SAME NOT FILED WITH THE CASE. ]
24.
CRMP/1120/2014
1
25.
CRMP/1127/2014
1
26.
CRMP/1128/2014
1
27.
CRMP/1135/2014
1
28.
CRMP/1136/2014
1
1
S.K.GUHA
SMT.GIRJA BAI
BALODA BAZAR
VS. RUPENDRA KUMAR
MANIKPURI AND ANR.
[ ON DEFAULT OF- 1. COURT FEE NOT AFFIXED IN CERTIFIED COPY OF ORDER. 2. CASE NO.
COMPLETELY NOT MENTIONED IN CAUSE TITLE. ]
THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH A.G.
BEMETARA
VS. BHUNESHWAR GARG &
ORS.
[ ON DEFAULT OF- 1. ADDRESS WRONGLY MENTIONED IN LEAVE TO APPEAL AND ACQUITTAL
APPEAL. 2. DAYS OF DELAY NOT MENTIONED IN APP. FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY. 3. COPY OF
OTHER RELEVANT EXHIBITED DOCUMENTS NOT FILED. 4. COPY OF STATEMENTS OF PROSECUTION
WITNESS NOT FILED. ]
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
A.G.
RAIGARH
VS. SUKHRAM CHOUHAN
[ ON DEFAULT OF- 1. COURT FEES NOT AFFIXED IN PAGE NO. 34 TO 59. 2. DAYS OF DELAY NOT
MENTIONED IN APP. FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY OF PARA NO. 5, 6 & PRAYER COLUMN. 3. PAGE
NO. 18 TO 33 & PART B & C NOT ATTESTED BY THE COUNSEL. 4. PAGE NO. 34 TO 59 TYPED
COPY NOT ATTESTED BY THE COUNSEL. ]
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
A.G.
VS. PUJA ADHIKARI AND
KORBA
ORS.
[ ON DEFAULT OF- 1. COPY OF STATEMENTS & OTHER RELEVANT EXHIBITED DOCUMENTS NOT FILED
WITH THE CASE. 2. RESPONDENT NO. 04, 05 & 06 ARE NOT ACQUITTED BY LEARNED COURT
BELOW, BUT THEY INCLUDED IN THIS CASE. 3. DATE NOT MENTIONED IN INDEX, SYNOPSIS, APP.
FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL, MEMO OF ACQUITTAL APPEAL & CERTIFICATE. 4. DAYS OF DELAY NOT
MENTIONED IN APPLICATION FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY. 5. AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF
APPLICATION FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY NOT FILED WITH THE CASE. 6. REVENUE DISTRICT
WRONGLY MENTIONED IN APP. OF LEAVE TO APPEAL. 7. PARA NOS. WRONGLY MENTIONED AFTER
PARA NO. 07 OF THE CASE. ]
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
VS. BALRAM GIRI GOSWAMI
A.G.
BILASPUR
4 of 4
[ ON DEFAULT OF- 1. PART B & C NOT ATTESTED. 2. DATE OF JUDGEMENT DT. WRONGLY
MENTIONED IN PAGE NO. 07 OF PRAYER COLUMN. 3. APP. FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY WITH
AFFIDAVIT NOT FILED. 4. COPY OF STATEMENTS & OTHER EXHIBITED RELEVANT DOCUMENTS NOT
FILED AS PER INDEX. ]
29.
CRMP/1137/2014
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
A.G.
SURGUJA
VS. RAMESH AGARIYA
(AMBIKAPUR)
[ ON DEFAULT OF- 1. RESPONDENT FATHER NAME WRONGLY MENTIONED IN LEAVE TO APPEAL AND
MEMO OF ACQUITTAL APPEAL. 2. APPLICATION FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY FILED WHICH IS NOT
REQUIRED. 3. B & C PART NOT CERTIFIED AS TRUE COPY. 4. COPY OF OTHER RELEVANT
EXHIBITED DOCUMENTS NOT FILED. 5. COPY OF STATEMENT OF PWS. NOT FILED. ]
30.
MCRCA/1295/2014
CHANDRAKANT VAISHNAVA @
RAKESH KUMAR JHA
A.G.
PAPPU
KANCHAN LATA JHA
BILASPUR
VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH JAI PRAKASH SHUKLA
[ FOR ORDERS ON DEFAULT NO. 02 THAT INFORMATION OF CO-ACCUSED NOT MENTIONED IN
AFFIDAVIT. ]
1
1
BY ORDER OF HON'BLE THE ACTING
CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/( RAMA SHANKAR PRASAD )
ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR (J)

Download Report