1 of 8 - High Court

1 of 8
Print
Monday the 22nd December 2014
ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR(JUDICIAL)
DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR MONDAY 22/12/2014
(AT 10:30 A.M.)
(THIS CAUSE LIST IS PUBLISHED UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE)
No
Case No
L.T.
Party Detail
Pet Adv
Res Adv
Remarks
1.
MCC/986/2014
2.
MCC/993/2014
HIREN KUMAR KHASTRIYA
MANOJ KUMAR
VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH JAISWAL
BILASPUR
AND ORS.
VINOD KUMAR TEKAM
[ FOR DEFAULT OF : 1. CERTIFIED COPY OF ORDER DATED 19/03/2014 IS NOT FILED WITH MEMO
OF PETITION . 2. W.P. NO. IS WRONGLY TYPED IN INDEX AND SYNOPSIS.] (WITH WPS
1321/2014 )
3.
MCC/994/2014
A.G.
MANOJ KUMAR
MEGHNATH PATEL
BILASPUR
VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH JAISWAL
VINOD KUMAR TEKAM
AND ORS.
[ FOR DEFAULT OF : 1. CERTIFIED COPY OF ORDER DATED 19/03/2014 IS NOT FILED WITH MEMO
OF PETITION. 2. W.P. NO. IS WRONGLY TYPED IN INDEX AND CAUSE TITLE OF THE PETITION.
3. COPIES OF THE ANNEXURES ARE NOT ATTESTED AS TRUE COPY IN ALL 3 SETS.] (WITH WPS
1322/2014 )
4.
MCC/995/2014
SMT.LEELA
VS. STATE
AND ORS.
[ FOR DEFAULT OF
FILED.](WITH WPS
5.
FA/189/2014
1
6.
SA/493/2014
SYED MAJID ALI
A.G.
SACHIN SINGH
MUNGELI
RAJPUT
RENU SINGH
[ FOR DEFAULT OF : 1. VALUATION OF THE APPEAL HAS NOT SPECIFICALLY MENTIONED FOR THE
PURPOSE OF JURISDICTION. 2. APPELLANT NO. 2 TO 9 HAVE NOT PUT THEIR SIGNATURE OR
THUMB IMPRESSION IN VAKALATNAMA. ]
FRESH MATTERS
SMT.SUSHILA PANDEY
SANTOSH SAHU
A.G.
VS. RISHI RAM ( SINCE
JANAK RAM VERMA
DECEASED) THRU. LRS SMT. SANTOSH SAHU
BILASPUR
SHITALA DEVI PANDEY(DEAD) S.P.SAHU
THR. LRS. SMT. VIDHYA
SANTOSH KUMAR
CHATURVEDI AND ORS.
VERMA
[FOR DEFAULT OF : 1. GAJENDRA KUMAR S/o RISHIRAM PANDE RES.NO. 1(d) IS NOT MADE A
PARTY.](WITH SA 198/2003 )
1
1
1
1
SINHA
MANOJ KUMAR
A.G.
BILASPUR
OF CHHATTISGARH JAISWAL
VINOD KUMAR TEKAM
: 1. CERTIFIED COPY OF ORDER IMPUGNED ANNEXURE A/1 HAS NOT
1320/2014)
SANGEETA CHHAJED
MANOJ PARANJPE
VS. MOHAN PARMAR AND ORS. VAIBHAV
RAJNANDGAON
A.GOVERDHAN
VIKRAM DIXIT
PRIYANKA MEHTA
[ FOR DEFAULT OF : 1. COPY OF POWER OF ATTORNEY IS NOT FILED WITH MEMO OF APPEAL.]
1
AMRIT DAS & ORS.
VS. MUNNALAL @ SHATRUHAN
& ANR.
2 of 8
7.
REVP/166/2014
MEHA KUMAR
SANJAY S.AGRAWAL
SAURABH JAIN
BILASPUR
ABHINAV KARDEKAR
[ FOR DEFAULT OF : 1. FOR ORDERS ON MAINTAINABILITY OF REVIEW PETITION AS PER
PROVISION OF RULE 9 OF ORDER 47 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. 2. PETITION FILED
BARRED BY 50 DAYS FOR WHICH APPLICATION FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IS NOT FILED. 3.
COURT FEE OF RS. 945/- IS DEFICIT IN MEMO OF PETITION AS PER ARTICLE 4 AND 5 OF THE
SCHEDULE I OF THE COURT FEE ACT. ] (WITH ATTACHED REVIEW PETITION 107/2014 AND SECOND
APPEAL NO. 02/2003 ARE KEPT BELOW.)
8.
MAC/1310/2014
1
9.
MAC/1344/2014
1
1
INDER SINGH
VS. SMT. SOMAWATI DATTA
THE NEW INDIA INSURANCE
SUDHIR AGRAWAL
COMPANY LIMITED
PRASANJEET DUTTA
BALODA BAZAR
VS. SUMITRA BAI AND ORS. JYOTI AGRAWAL
[ FOR DEFAULT OF : 1. SYNOPSIS HAS NOT FILED. 2. AFFIDAVIT HAS NOT FILED IN SUPPORT
OF STAY APPLICATION ]
SMT. GEETA DEVI YADAV &
DHARMESH
ORS.
SRIVASTAVA
VS. JASHWANT SINGH & ORS. TARUN DANSENA
[ FOR DEFAULT OF : 1. APPEAL IS BARRED BY 04 DAYS.]
10.
MAC/1346/2014
1
11.
MAC/1349/2014
1
RAIPUR
SMT. PUNNI BAI NISHAD
PAWAN KESHARWANI
VS. KARUNA SINGH THAKUR &
RAIPUR
ORS.
[ FOR DEFAULT OF : 1. CERTIFIED COPY OF IMPUGNED AWARD IS INCOMPLETE FILED i.e.
COPYING FLAG IS NOT ATTACHED HEAD COPYIST IS NOT SIGNED WITH THE SAME FOR PURPOSE OF
LIMITATION. 2. ADDRESS OF THE RESPONDENT NO. 2 IS INCOMPLETE.]
SMT. LATA GUPTA
VS. GOVIND YADAV & ORS.
PUSHPENDRA KUMAR
PATEL
DASHRATH KUSHWAHA
[ FOR DEFAULT OF : 1. APPEAL IS BARRED BY 35 DAYS.]
KORBA
PUSHPENDRA KUMAR
RAJESH JAISWAL
PATEL
KORBA
VS. TIRITHRAM PATEL &
DASHRATH KUSHWAHA
ORS.
[ FOR DEFAULT OF: 1. APPEAL FILED BARRED BY 233 DAYS CONDONATION OF DELAY APPLICATION
IS NOT FILED WITH MEMO OF APPEAL.]
12.
MAC/1351/2014
1
13.
WP227/891/2014
1
14.
WP227/922/2014
1
15.
WP227/931/2014
1
16.
WP227/933/2014
1
MAHAVEER PRASAD KEDIA
SUDHIR AGRAWAL
VS. MOTILAL SAHU AND ANR. PRASANJEET DUTTA
[ ON DEFAULT OF - (1) SYNOPSIS IS NOT FILED. (2) ANNEX. P/4 AND P/5 AND PAGE NO. 24
ARE HAND WRITTEN AND TYPED COPY OF THE SAME IS NOT FILED. ]
PRIYANKA MEHTA
PRABHU VISHWAKARMA
A.G.
VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH MANOJ PARANJPE
& ORS.
VAIBHAV
A.GOVERDHAN
VIKRAM DIXIT
[ ON DEFAULT OF - (1) NAME OF THE WITNESS MENTIONED AS A. CHANDAL IN SEAL OF OATH
COMMISSIONER IN AFFIDAVIT AND PRIYANKA MEHTA COUNSEL FOR PETITIONER HAS SIGNED AS
WITNESS BOTH ARE CONTRARY. ]
DINESH MODI
RAJEEV BHARAT
VS. ASHUTOSH SAO
NEERAJ CHOUBEY
[ ON DEFAULT OF - (1) PAGING HAVE NOT DONE COMPLETELY IN INDEX COLUMN. (2) ADDRESS OF
PETITIONER WRONGLY MENTIONED IN CAUSE TITLE. (3) ANNEX. NOT CERTIFIED BY THE COUNSEL
INCLUDING SPARE COPY . ]
DISTRICT MANAGER FCI DURG
CHHATTISGARH AND ANR.
VS. SHRI DHARAM LAL AND
ORS.
SHAILENDRA SHARMA
PRAVESH SHARMA
ANSHUMAN
SHRIVASTAVA
ASHUTOSH SHUKLA
RATAN PANDEY
PANKAJ AGRAWAL
(CAVT.)
3 of 8
[ ON DEFAULT OF - (1) DATE OF EVENTS ARE NOT IN CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER IN THE SYNOPSIS.
(2) CERTIFIED COPY OF TEH OR. DT 16.07.14 IS FILED BUT APPL. FOR EXEMPTION IS FILED.
]{ALONGWITH CAVT. NO. 954/14}
17.
WPS/6635/2014
1
AARIF ABDULLA
DR.SHAILESH AHUJA A.G.
VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH ANJU AHUJA
& ORS.
C.P.SONI
[ ON DEFAULT OF - (1) PAGE NO.6 OF PETITION IS FAINT AND NOT READABLE. ]
18.
WPS/6637/2014
1
19.
WPS/6644/2014
1
20.
WPS/6646/2014
1
21.
WPS/6648/2014
1
22.
WPS/6649/2014
1
23.
WPS/6654/2014
1
24.
WPS/6655/2014
1
25.
WPC/2454/2014
1
26.
WPC/2457/2014
1
DR. (SMT.) ANANDA GUPTA
MANISH NIGAM
A.G.
VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
& ANR.
[ ON DEFAULT OF - (1) DISTRICT NAME WRONGLY MENTIONED IN AFFIDAVIT. (2) DT. WRONGLY
MENTIONED IN PARA NO. 8.9. (3) PAGE NO. 18 NOT READABLE BUT FILED AS TYPED COPY . ]
SMT. BABITA GANGNE
VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
& ORS.
[ ON DEFAULT OF - (1) ANNEX. P/2
JEETENDRA KUMAR
A.G.
GUPTA
SUDEEP JOHRI
AND P/3 (PAGE NO. 10 TO 11) ARE FAINT. ]
SMT. RAJNI DEWANGAN
PUNIT RUPAREL
A.G.
VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
& ORS.
[ ON DEFAULT OF - (1) DATE OF EVENTS NOT IN CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER IN THE SYNOPSIS. (2)
PAGE NO. 21, 22 AND 23 ARE FAINT BUT TYPED COPY OF SAME FILED WITH PETITION. (3) SOME
PORTION OF PAGE NO. 29 IS NOT READABLE AND TYPED COPY OF SAME NOT FILED WITH THE
PETITION. (4) PAGE NO. 56 IS NOT LEGIBLE BUT TYPED COPY OF SAME FILED WITH THE
PETITION. (5) DATE NOT SHOWN IN THE PAGE NO. 24 (P/2) BUT SAME IS MENTIONED IN THE
PARA NO. 8.4 OF PETITION. ]
PUNIT RUPAREL
A.G.
SANJAY KUMAR PAUL
VS. THE STATE OF
CHHATTISGARH & ORS.
[ ON DEFAULT OF - (1) PAGE NO. 13, 21 AND 22 NOT READABLE. (2) PETITIONER NOT SIGNED
IN VAKALTNAMA. ]
A.G.
SMT. CHITRAREKHA BHUARYA AJAY SHRIVASTAVA
G.P.MATHUR
& ORS.
VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
& ORS.
[ ON DEFAULT OF - (1) DETAILS IS WRONGLY MENTIONED IN PARA NO. 3 IN MEMO OF PETITION.
(2) PAGE NO. 38 IS ILLEGIBLE. ]
B.P.RAO
A.G.
VIKESH GAJENDRA
VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
& ORS.
[ ON DEFAULT OF - (1) SHRI B.PRABHAKAR RAO ADV. HAS NOT PUT HIS SIGNATURE IN THE
VAKALATNAMA. (2) DATE OF ANNEX. P/1 IS WRONGLY MENTIONED IN MEMO OF PETITION NO. 8.2
(3) PAGE NO. 13 AND 15 ARE FAINT. ]
KARUNESH MESHRAM
B.P.RAO
A.G.
VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
& ORS.
[ ON DEFAULT OF - (1) ANNEX., IS WRONGLY MARKED IN PARA NO. 9.6 AND 10.3 IN MEMO OF
PETITION. ]
CHANDRIKA PRASAD PATEL
PUSHPENDRA KUMAR
A.G.
VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH PATEL
& ORS.
DASHRATH KUSHWAHA
[ ON DEFAULT OF - (1) AS PER OFFICE NOTE DT. 12.12.14 DEFAULT NO. 01 NOT REMOVED BY
THE COUNSEL. ]
SMT.GAFURAN BEE & ORS.
SHAKTI RAJ SINHA
A.G.
VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH NISHI KANT SINHA
AND ORS.
[ ON DEFAULT OF - (1) AS PER OFFICE NOTE DTD. 12.12.14 DEFAULTS NO. 2 AND 3 NOT
REMOVED BY THE COUNSEL. ]
4 of 8
27.
WPC/2517/2014
1
CHETAN LAL JOSHI
DEVESH CHANDRA
A.G.
VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH VERMA
AND ANR.
[ ON DEFAULT OF - (1) COPY OF ANNEX. P/7 NOT FILED WITH THE CASE AS PER MENTIONED IN
PARA NO. 8.2 ]
28.
WPC/2524/2014
1
29.
WPC/2526/2014
1
30.
CRA/1301/2014
MARKUSH
VIKASH SHRIVASTAVA A.G.
VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH KESHAV DEWANGAN
BASTAR(JAGDAL
HARSHAL CHOUHAN
PUR)
MAYANK CHANDRAKAR
AKASH PANDEY
[ ON DEFAULT OF- 1. SENTENCE WRONGLY MENTIONED IN CAUSE TITLE OF THE CASE. ]
31.
CRA/1302/2014
RAJESH @ KHULUR BAHELIYA SHASHI BHUSAN
A.G.
SURAJPUR
VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH TIWARI
[ ON DEFAULT OF- 1. FACTS OF THE CASE NOT MENTIONED IN THIS CASE. 2. DATE NOT
MENTIONED IN INDEX, SYNOPSIS, MEMO OF APPEAL, CERTIFICATE & APPLICATION FOR
SUSPENSION OF SENTENCE. ]
32.
CRR/954/2014
A.G.
MANOJ PARANJPE
AJAY URAON ( BASANT
VIKRAM DIXIT
URAON)
SURGUJA
VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH VAIBHAV
(AMBIKAPUR)
A.GOVERDHAN
PRIYANKA MEHTA
[ ON DEFAULT OF- 1. SENTENCE & CONVICTION NOT MENTIONED IN CAUSE TITLE OF THE CASE.
2. ANNEX. WRONGLY MENTIONED IN CAUSE TITLE OF THE CASE. 3. SESSIONS TRIAL NO. WRONGLY
MENTIONED IN PRAYER COLUMN OF THE CASE. ]
33.
CRR/956/2014
1
34.
MCRC/6993/2014
MONU @ JITENDRA RAJAK
G.S.AHLUWALIA
A.G.
VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH H.S.AHLUWALIA
[ ON DEFAULT OF- 1. COPY OF LOWER COURT REJECTION OT FILED. ]
35.
MCRC/6994/2014
DILMOHAN JAIN
SAMIR SINGH
A.G.
JANJGIRVS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH ANIL GULATI
CHAMPA
[ ON DEFAULT OF- 1. APP. U/S 439 OF CRPC. & CERTIFICATE NOT SIGNED BY SHRI SAMIR
SINGH, ADVOCATE. 2. MEMO OF APPEARANCE NOT SIGNED BY SHRI ANIL GULATI, ADVOCATE. ]
36.
MCRC/7002/2014
RAJKAMAL KASHYAP
PALLAV MISHRA
A.G.
MUNGELI
VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH UTSAV MAHISWAR
[ ON DEFAULT OF- 1. DATE OF ARREST OF THE APPLICANT/ACCUSED WRONGLY MENTIONED IN
CAUSE TITLE & PARA NO. 03 OF THE CASE. 2. NAME OF LEARNED LOWER COURT IN WHICH THE
CASE IS PENDING WRONGLY MENTIONED IN CAUSE TITLE OF THE CASE. 3. DATE NOT MENTIONED
IN MEMO OF BAIL PETITION & CERTIFICATE. 4. MEMO OF APPEARANCE NOT SIGNED BY SHRI
UTSAV MAHISWAR, COUNSEL FOR APPLICANT. ]
M/S SHRADDHA CONSTRUCTION SUNITA JAIN
A.G.
COMPANY
PRATEEK SHARMA
VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH SUYASH DHAR
AND ORS.
ASHOK MISHRA
[ ON DEFAULT OF - (1) TWO TENDER PROCESS (3797 AND 3798) ARE CHALLENGED IN THIS WRIT
PETITION INSTEAD OF SEPARATE PETITION. (2) NAME OF RESP. IS WRONGLY MENTIONED IN
VERIFICATION CLAUSE IN AFFIDAVITS. (PAGE NO. 13 AND 34) ]
GURMIT SINGH
T.K.TIWARI
A.G.
VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH SMT. K. TIWARI
AND ORS.
ADITYA KHARE
[ ON DEFAULT OF - (1) AFFIDAVIT NOT IDENTIFY. (2) MEMO OF WRIT PETITION AND ANNEX.
NOT SERVE TO COUNSEL FOR THE RESP. NO. 2 ]
1
1
1
AMOSH JIWAN
PUNIT RUPAREL
BILASPUR
VS. SMT. HELSA
[ ON DEFAULT OF- 1. APPLICATION FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY WITH AFFIDAVIT NOT FILED. 2.
DATE NOT MENTIONED IN ALL THE PETITION INCLUDING INTERIM RELIEF APPLICATION. 3. SOME
PORTION OF PAGE NO. 10, 11 ARE FAINT. ]
1
BILASPUR
1
1
5 of 8
37.
MCRC/7008/2014
YUVRAJ LAHRE
VIKASH SHRIVASTAVA A.G.
VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH KESHAV DEWANGAN
HARSHAL CHOUHAN
RAJNANDGAON
MAYANK CHANDRAKAR
AKASH PANDEY
[ ON DEFAULT OF- 1. DETAIL OF VERIFICATION WRONGLY MENTIONED IN AFFIDAVIT. 2. PART B
& C NOT ATTESTED BY THE COUNSEL. ]
38.
MCRC/7013/2014
SAKET BIHARI CHELAK
DR.SHAILESH AHUJA A.G.
VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH ANJU AHUJA
BILASPUR
C.P.SONI
[ ON DEFAULT OF- 1. CERTIFIED COPY OF ORDER DT. 17/04/2014 NOT FILED WITH THE CASE.
2. BAIL REJECTION ORDER FROM LEARNED COURT BELOW NOT FILED WITH THE CASE. 3. NAME OF
LEARNED COURT BELOW IN WHICH THE CASE IS PENDING NOT MENTIONED IN CAUSE TITLE OF THE
CASE. 4. VAKALATNAMA NOT SIGNED BY DR. SHAILESH AHUJA, ANJU AHUJA COUNSEL. ]
39.
MCRC/7014/2014
RAHIM KHAN
UTTAM PANDEY
A.G.
JANJGIRVS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH YOGESH CHANDRA
CHAMPA
[ ON DEFAULT OF- 1. APPLICANT HAS ALREADY FILED 1ST BAIL APPLICATION (MCRC 4066/14)
THROUGH ANOTHER COUNSEL. 2. STATUS WRONGLY MENTIONED IN PARA NO. 01 OF PETITION AND
PARA NO. 03 OF AFFIDAVIT. 3. CERTIFIED COPY OF 1ST BAIL REJECTION ORDER NOT FILED. ]
40.
CRMP/1129/2014
INDRAJEET SINHA
B.P.SINGH
A.G.
VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH SHIVENDRA BHARDWAJ
BALOD
& ORS.
PURNENDRA
KHICHARIYA
KHUSHBU VERMA
[ ON DEFAULT OF- 1. PARTICULAR COMPLETELY NOT MENTIONED IN INDEX SL NO. 06. 2. NAME
OF COURT WRONGLY MENTIONED IN SYNOPSIS. 3. PARTICULAR WRONGLY MENTIONED IN PARA NO.
02 OF STAY APPLICATION. ]
41.
CRMP/1135/2014
A.G.
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
KORBA
VS. PUJA ADHIKARI AND
ORS.
[ ON DEFAULT OF- 1. COPY OF STATEMENTS & OTHER RELEVANT EXHIBITED DOCUMENTS NOT FILED
WITH THE CASE. 2. RESPONDENT NO. 04,05 & 06 ARE NOT ACQUITTED BY LEARNED COURT BELOW,
BUT THEY INCLUDED IN THIS CASE. 3. DATE NOT MENTIONED IN INDEX, SYNOPSIS, APP. FOR
LEAVE TO APPEAL, MEMO OF ACQUITTAL APPEAL & CERTIFICATE. 4. DAYS OF DELAY NOT
MENTIONED IN APPLICATION FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY. 5. AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF
APPLICATION FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY NOT FILED WITH THE CASE. 6. REVENUE DISTRICT
WRONGLY MENTIONED IN APP. OF LEAVE TO APPEAL. 7. PARA NOS. WRONGLY MENTIONED AFTER
PARA NO. 07 OF THE CASE. ]
42.
CRMP/1136/2014
1
43.
CRMP/1137/2014
1
44.
MCRCA/1286/2014
DURGANAND JHA
Y.C.SHARMA
A.G.
VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH VIVEK RATHORE
M.ASHA
RAIPUR
AJAY CHANDRA
ANITA SURYAVANSHI
[ ON DEFAULT OF- 1. COUNSEL NAMELY M.ASHA & AJAY KUMAR CHADRA, ADVOCATE HAVE NOT
SIGNED MEMO OF APPEARANCE. 2. MEMO OF APPEARANCE NOT FILLED COMPLETELY. ]
1
1
1
1
1
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
A.G.
BILASPUR
VS. BALRAM GIRI GOSWAMI
[ ON DEFAULT OF- 1. PART B & C NOT ATTESTED. 2. DATE OF JUDGEMENT DT. WRONGLY
MENTIONED IN PAGE NO. 07 OF PRAYER COLUMN. 3. APP. FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY WITH
AFFIDAVIT NOT FILED. 4. COPY OF STATEMENTS & OTHER EXHIBITED RELEVANT DOCUMENTS NOT
FILED AS PER INDEX. ]
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
A.G.
SURGUJA
VS. RAMESH AGARIYA
(AMBIKAPUR)
[ ON DEFAULT OF- 1. RESPONDENT FATHER NAME WRONGLY MENTIONED IN LEAVE TO APPEAL AND
MEMO OF ACQUITTAL APPEAL. 2. APPLICATION FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY FILED WHICH IS NOT
REQUIRED. 3. B & C PART NOT CERTIFIED AS TRUE COPY. 4. COPY OF OTHER RELEVANT
EXHIBITED DOCUMENTS NOT FILED. 5. COPY OF STATEMENT OF PWS. NOT FILED. ]
1
DEFAULT MATTERS
6 of 8
45.
FA/13/2002
6
KRISHNA KUMAR SHUKLA AND
OTHERS
VS. STATE BANK OF INDIA
P.R.PATANKAR
H.S.PATEL
V.R.TIWARI
B.D.GURU
[ FOR ORDERS ON DEFAULT OF NON-PAYMENT OF P.F. BY ORDINARY AND RAD MODE FOR RESP. AS
PER THE HON'BLE C.O. DT. 26/11/2014 AND APPLICATION FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN P.F.
NOT FILED ] WR
46.
WP/4335/2004
7
47.
MAC/999/2014
SURYA PRAKASH SHARMA
VIKASH PANDEY
VS. JAMIRA KHATUN AND
A.K.YADAV
BEMETARA
ORS.
[ FOR DEFAULT OF : 1. APPEAL IS BARRED BY 95 DAYS. 2. C.C. OF AWARD HAS NOT FILED. 3.
RECEIPT OF THE STATUTORY DEPOSIT HAS NOT FILED. 4. PARTICULARS OF AFFIXED C.F. WITH
APPEAL HAS WRONGLY MENTIONED IN CAUSE TITLE AND AR(J)S NOTE DT. 14/11/2014 ]
48.
MAC/1112/2014
1
49.
MAC/1221/2014
1
50.
MAC/1222/2014
1
51.
MAC/1223/2014
1
52.
MAC/1224/2014
1
53.
MAC/1229/2014
1
LAXMAN PRASAD VISHWAKARMA RAKESH JHA
A.G.
VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH JITENDRA PALI
& ORS.
SUDHA BHARDWAJ
PRATEEK SHARMA
RAHUL JHA
MONIKA TIWARI
[ FOR ORDERS ON DEFAULT OF NON COMPLIANCE OF HON'BLE COURT ORDER DATED 26/04/2006
REGARDING PAPER BOOK HAS NOT BEEN FILED ]
1
SMT. ANJANI SINGH & ORS.
VS. ARJUN AGRAWAL & ANR.
VIKRANT PILLAY
SURGUJA
NEEL RATAN JAISWAL
(AMBIKAPUR)
RISHI RAHUL SONI
[ FOR DEFAULT OF : 1. APPEAL IS BARRED BY 34 DAYS. 2. APPEAL HAS FILED UNDER WHICH
ACT NAME OF THE SAME IS WRONGLY APPEARS IN CAUSE TITLE & PRAYER CLAUSE. 4. SIGNS. OF
ANNEXURE NO. 2 & 3 ARE NOT APPEARS ON VAKALATNAMA AND AR(J)S NOTE DT. 02/12/2014 ]
R.N.PUSTY
THE ORIENTAL INSU. CO.
DANTEWADA
LTD.
VS. MAHESH & ORS.
[ FOR DEFAULT OF: 1. SYNOPSIS HAS NOT FILED. 2. INSTEAD OF C.C., UNAUTHENTICATED
XEROX COPY OF AWARD HAS FILED. 3. COPY OF RECEIPT OF STATUTORY DEPOSIT HAS NOT FILED.
4. C.C. OF ORDER U/S 170 OF M.V. ACT HAS NOT FILED. 5. EXTRA SETS OF APPEAL HAS NOT
MADE AUTHENTICATED AND AR(J)S NOTE DT. 28/11/2014 ]
R.N.PUSTY
THE ORIENTAL INSU. CO.
DANTEWADA
LTD.
VS. SOMDU & ORS.
[ FOR DEFAULT OF : 1. SYNOPSIS HAS NOT FILED. 2. RECEIPT OF STATUTORY DEPOSIT
(ANNEXURE A/1) HAS NOT FILED. 3. C.C. OF ORDER U/S 170 OF M.V. ACT HAS NOT FILED. 4.
EXTRA SETS OF APPEAL HAS NOT MADE AUTHENTICATED AND AR(J)S NOTE DT. 28/11/2014 ]
THE ORIENTAL INSU. CO.
R.N.PUSTY
DANTEWADA
LTD.
VS. VAMAN & ORS.
[ FOR DEFAULT OF: 1. SYNOPSIS HAS NOT FILED 2. RECEIPT OF STATUTORY DEPOSIT HAS NOT
FILED. 3. C.C. OF ORDER U/S 170 OF M.V. ACT HAS NOT FILED. 4. INSTEAD OF C.C. OF
AWARD, UNAUTHENTICATED XEROX COPY OF THE SAME HAS FILED. 5. EXTRA SETS OF APPEAL HAS
NOT MAD AUTHENTICATED AND AR(J)S NOTE DT. 28/11/2014 ]
SATISH KUMAR TIWARI
VS. HARDEV AND ORS.
WASIM MIYAN
AWADH TRIPATHI
SURGUJA
INDIRA TRIPATHI
(AMBIKAPUR)
VIVEK KUMAR
TRIPATHI
[ FOR DEFAULT OF : 1. RECEIPT OF STATUTORY DEPOSIT HAS NOT FILED. 2. ONE ADVOCATE HAS
NOT PUT HIS SIGN. IN VAKALATNAMA AND AR(J)S NOTE DT. 01/12/2014 ]
RAJMAN JAIN
PRAVIN KUMAR
VS. MANIRAM PADDA AND
TULSYAN
KANKER
ORS.
[ FOR DEFAULT OF : 1. APPEAL IS BARRED BY 24 DAYS AND AR(J)S NOTE DT. 01/12/2014 ]
7 of 8
54.
MAC/1231/2014
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
DANTEWADA
VS. BHOGAMI LAXMAN & ORS. A.G.
[ FOR DEFAULT OF; 1. CERTIFIED COPY OF IMPUGNED AWARD HAS NOT BEEN FILED. 2. COPY OF
RECEIPT OF MANDATORY DEPOSIT HAS NOT BEEN FILED AND AR(J)S NOTE DT. 01/12/2014 ]
55.
MAC/1233/2014
1
56.
MAC/1235/2014
1
57.
MAC/1236/2014
1
58.
WPS/4528/2014
2
59.
WPS/4572/2014
3
60.
WA/227/2014
5
61.
WA/393/2014
1
62.
WPC/2323/2014
1
63.
CRMP/881/2014
VIJAY KUMAR RATHORE
A.G.
VS. DAYA SHANKER RATHORE AMIT SHARMA
RAIGARH
AND ANR.
[ ON DEFAULT OF - 3. MEMO OF APPEARANCE NOT SIGNED BY SHRI AMIT SHARMA COUNSEL FOR
APPLICANT. ]
64.
CRMP/1012/2014
VAIBHAV AGRAWAL
A.K.PRASAD
A.G.
VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH RISHIKANT MAHOBIA
AND ANR.
RAVI MAHOBIA
[ ON DEFAULT OF- 1. COPY OF PROCEEDINGS NOT FILED. ]
1
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
A.G.
DANTEWADA
VS. PADAMI PODIYA & ORS.
[ FOR DEFAULT OF ; 1. COPY OF RECEIPT OF MANDATORY DEPOSIT HAS NOT BEEN FILED WITH
THE MEMO OF APPEAL AND AR(J)S NOTE DT. 01/12/2014 ]
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
DANTEWADA
VS. PANDU & ORS.
A.G.
[ FOR DEFAULT OF : 1. CERTIFIED COPY OF IMPUGNED AWARD HAS NOT BEEN FILED. 2. COPY OF
RECEIPT OF MANDATORY DEPOSIT IS NOT FILED WITH MEMO OF APPEAL AND AR(J)S NOTE DT.
01/12/2014 ]
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
DANTEWADA
VS. PADAMI SUKARI & ORS. A.G.
[ FOR DEFAULT OF : 1. C.C. OF AWARD HAS NOT FILED. 2. RECEIPT OF STATUTORY DEPOSIT
HAS NOT FILED AND AR(J)S NOTE DT. 01/12/2014 ]
SMT.HARSH TIWARI
S.K.DADSENA
A.G.
VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH AJAY SHRIVASTAVA
AND ORS.
[ FOR ORDER'S ON DEFAULT OF PAGE NO. 20, 24, 37 ARE NOT READABLE AND FAINT ]
VIVEK KUMAR
TRIPATHI
AWADH TRIPATHI
INDIRA TRIPATHI
WASIM MIYAN
[ FOR ORDER ON DEFAULT OF OFFICE NOTE DATE 16.12.2014 AS PER CHECKER REPORT IN
COMPLIANCE OF HON'BLE COURT ORDER DATE 12.12.2014 CHECKED AND FOUND THAT PAGE NO. 08
TO 19 ARE FAINT AND HAND WRITTEN DOCUMENTS. ]
ARUN MESHRAM
VS. CHHATTISGARH STATE
WARE HOUSING CORPORATION
& ORS.
RAM KUMAR TIWARI
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH AND A.G.
(RESP. NO
ORS.
1),LAXMIN TONDEY
VS. DURGA PRASAD AGRAWAL
[ FOR ORDER ON DEFAULT OF AS PER CHECKER REPORT DATE 11.12.2014 OFFICE NOTE EXEMPTION
APPLICATION FILED FOR EXEMPTION ON TYPED COPY OF DOCUMENT -B. IS HAND WRITTEN
APPLICATION EXEMPTION FROM FILING TYPED COPY DOCUMENT IS FILED I.A.NO. 05 ]
PETITIONER IN
SHYAM TEKCHANDANI,
RAMESH KUMAR NAYAK
A.P.SHARMA
VS. SHRI PRABHAKAR GWAL & PERSON
ORS.
[ ON DEFAULT OF A.R.(J) NOTE DATED 21/11/2014 & O.N.DATED 11/11/2014 FOR DEFAULT NO.
(1) ANNEX. P/1 IS HAND WRITTEN AND TYPED COPY OF THE SAME IS NOT FILED. ]
GYAN CHAND JAIN
J.K.SAXENA
A.G.
VS. COLLECTOR, JASHPUR
C.JAYANT K.RAO
AND ORS.
[ ON DEFAULT OF - (1) CERTIFIED COPY OF ORDER DATED 14.06.2013 AND 08.01.2014 ARE NOT
FILED. (2) CASE NO. NOT MENTIONED IN PARA NO. 3 IN MEMO OF PETITION & AR(J) ORDER
DATED - 02/12/2014 ]
1
1
RAIPUR
8 of 8
BY ORDER OF HON'BLE THE ACTING
CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/( RAMA SHANKAR PRASAD )
ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR (J)

Download Report