Print
Thursday the 25th September 2014
ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR(JUDICIAL)
DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR THURSDAY 25/09/2014
(FROM 10:30 A.M. To 16:30 P.M.)
(THIS CAUSE LIST IS PUBLISHED UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
No
Case No
Party Detail
Advocates
Remarks
1.
MCC/767/2014
2.
MCC/782/2014
PRADEEP KUMAR GUARHA
MANOJ KUMAR DUBEY /
BILASPUR
VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH & ORS. A.G.
[ FOR DEFAULT OF : 1. COURT FEE IS NOT AFFIXED IN CERTIFIED COPY OF ORDER IMPUGNED.] (WITH
WPS 3095/2007 )
3.
SA/332/2014
PHOOLSUNDERI
AJIT SINGH ,SURESH TANDAN /
JASHPUR
VS. RAMCHANDRA BHAGAT & ORS.
,A.G.
[ FOR DEFAULT OF : 1. VALUATION OF APPEAL IS WRONGLY MENTIONED IN CAUSE TITLE OF APPEAL AS
PER PARA NO. 23 OF THE TRIAL COURT.]
4.
SA/334/2014
ANUJ GUPTA (SINCE DEAD) THROU
RAJNISH SHRIVASTAVA ,MALAY KUMAR BHADURI /
LRS AJAY GUPTA & ORS.
A.G.
MUNGELI
VS. THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
[ FOR DEFAULT OF : 1. COPIES OF ANNEXURE A/1 & ANNEXURE A/2 ARE QUITE CONTRARILY ANNEXED
AS PER INDEX, CAUSE TITLE, PARA NO. 4, 6 AND PRAYER CLAUSE. 2. RELEVANT DATE OF IMPUGNED
JUDGMENT HAS WRONGLY MENTIONED IN PARA NO. 6. 3. COPY OF JUDGMENT OF THE TRIAL COURT IS
VERY FAINT. 4. APPELLANTS HAVE NOT PUT THEIR SIGN. IN VAKALATNAMA.]
5.
SA/336/2014
MUS.GONCHI BAI AND ORS.
VS. MUS.GANGAY AND ORS.
FRESH MATTERS
SHYAM LAL DANSENA
MANOJ KUMAR JAISWAL ,VINOD KUMAR TEKAM /
VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH AND
A.G.
BILASPUR
ORS.
[ FOR DEFAULT OF : 1. COURT FEE OF RS. 10/- IS NOT AFFIXED IN CONDONATION OF DELAY
APPLICATION.] (WITH WP(S) 3759/2014)
[ FOR
PARTY
CAUSE
NO. 1
MANISH THAKUR ,B.P.SHARMA,VIVEK
BASTAR(JAGDALP
CHOPDA,SAMEER ORAON,RAZA ALI /
UR)
A.G.
DEFAULT OF : 1. AS PER C.C. OF IMPUGNED JUDGMENT MUS. SOMARI HAS EXCLUDED IN MAKING
IN CAUSE TITLE OF APPEAL MEMO. 2. PARTICULARS OF RES.NO. 27 HAS NOT MENTIONED IN
TITLE. 3. COPY OF DECREE OF THE TRIAL COURT HAS NOT FILED. 4. INSTEAD OF APPELLANTS
& 2 SOME OTHER PERSONS HAVE PUT THEIR THUMB IMPRESSION IN VAKALATNAMA.]
6.
MAC/968/2014
SMT. SATRUPA & ORS.
KUNAL DAS /
DHAMTARI
VS. NOM SING & ANR.
[ FOR DEFAULT OF : 1. AWARDED AMOUNT & VALUATION OF APPEAL HAVE WRONGLY MENTIONED IN CAUSE
TITLE.]
7.
MAC/970/2014
TEKMATI & ORS.
ASHISH GUPTA ,MANISH UPADHYAY /
RAIGARH
VS. MAKESHAR RAM & ANR.
[ FOR DEFAULT OF : 1. RES.NO. 3 BRANCH MANAGER UNIVERSAL SOMPO GENERAL INSURANCE IS A
PARTY BEFORE CLAIM TRIBUNAL BUT HE HAS NOT MADE A PARTY IN MEMO OF APPEAL.]
8.
MAC/971/2014
RAJEEV BHARAT ,UPENDRA BHARAT,NEERAJ
BIHARI RAM PANIKA @ BIHARI LAL
KORIYA
KULDEEP
CHOUBEY /
(BAIKUNTHPUR)
VS. KAMLA BAI & ORS.
[ FOR DEFAULT OF : 1. NEITHER CLAIMED AMOUNT NOR VALUATION OF APPEAL HAS MENTIONED IN
CAUSE TITLE.]
1 of 6
9.
WP227/733/2014
INDRA KUMAR JAIN (DIED) LRS
A.N.PANDEY /
VINOD KUMAR JAIN & ANR.
VS. MUST. SUPASI BAI & ORS.
[ ON DEFAULT OF - (1) STATUS OF PARTIES NOT MENTIONED IN THE CAUSE TITLE OF PETITION. (2)
COPY ANNEX. P/5 AND P/6 ARE HAND WRITTEN AND TYPED COPIES OF SAME NOT FILED WITH THE
PETITION. ]
10.
WPS/5102/2014
YUGAL KISHORE SAHU
RAHUL JHA ,MANOJ CHAUHAN,SANJEEV SAHU /
VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH AND
A.G.
ORS.
[ ON DEFAULT OF - (1) PETITIONER NOT SIGNED IN VAKALATNAMA. ]
11.
WPS/5111/2014
JAVED KHAN
SHIKHAR SHARMA ,RAGHVENDRA PRADHAN /
VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH & ORS A.G.
[ ON DEFAULT OF - (1) PAGE NO. 29, 30 AND 95 TO 105 ARE HAND WRITTEN AND TYPED COPY OF THE
SAME IS NOT FILED. ]
12.
WPS/5112/2014
VIJAY PRATAP SINGH BANJARE
C.K.SAHU ,C.R.SAHU,A.D.KULDEEP /
VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH & ORS A.G.
[ ON DEFAULT OF - (1) COPY OF PAGE NO. 9, 10 AND 11 ARE NOT READABLE BUT TYPED COPIES ARE
SAME FILED WITH THE PETITION. (2) SOME PORTION OF PAGE NO. 19 IS NOT READABLE AND TYPED
COPY ALSO FILED INCOMPLETE WITH THE PETITION. ]
13.
WPS/5113/2014
SATYA PRAKASH VERMA
GURU PRASAD KURRE ,PRADEEP SAKSENA /
VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH & ORS A.G.
[ ON DEFAULT OF - (1) AGE OF PETITIONER WRONGLY MENTIONED IN THE BOTH AFFIDAVIT. (2) BOTH
AFFIDAVITS NOT IDENTIFIED. (3) PARA NO. 2 OF AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF AN APPL. FOR AD-I.R.
IS INCOMPLETE. ]
14.
WPS/5118/2014
DR. VINOD KUMAR GARG
ASHOK KUMAR SHUKLA ,ATANU GHOSH,GUNJAN
VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH & ORS SHUKLA /
A.G.
[ ON DEFAULT OF - (1) COP OF PETITION WITH ALL ANNEXURES NOT SERVED TO RES.NO. 2 AS PER
RULE 47(1) C.G. HIGH COURT RULE 2007. (2) COPY OF ANNEX. P/7 (PAGE NO. 39) IS NOT IN
SEPARATE FILED (3) PAGE NO. 26 IS NOT FILED COMPLETELY WITH THE PETITION. ]
15.
WPC/1911/2014
DEV PRASAD MISHRA
ANURAG KHATRI ,ARUN KOCHAR,RENU
VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH & ORS. KOCHAR,RAVI KUMAR BHAGAT /
A.G.
[ ON DEFAULT OF - (1) PAGE NO. 10 IS ILLEGIBLE AND TYPED COPY IS ALSO INCOMPLETE. ]
16.
WPC/1919/2014
M/S STEELCO ISPAT PVT. LIMITED
SHASHI KUMAR KUSHWAHA
VS. BANKING OMBUDSMAN & ANR.
TAPDIYA,C.R. WADEKAR,
[ ON DEFAULT OF - (1) ANNEX. IS WRONGLY MARKED IN PARA
VAKALTNAMA SIGNED BY THE COUNSEL SHRI S.OL TAPDIYA AND
17.
CRA/925/2014
VEERA KUMAR PAL
VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
18.
CRA/926/2014
MONU
VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
19.
CRA/930/2014
SMT. RAMKUNWAR
AJAY MISHRA ,JAI PRAKASH SHUKLA /
VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
A.G.
[ ON DEFAULT OF- 1. NATURE OF CASE AND CASE NO. WRONGLY MENTIONED IN CAUSE TITLE. 2.
COUNSEL NAMELY SHRI JAI PRAKASH SHUKLA HAS NOT SIGNED THE MEMO OF APPEARANCE. ]
20.
CRA/931/2014
RAMANAND CHOUHAN
UMAKANT SINGH CHANDEL /
VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
A.G.
[ ON DEFAULT OF- 1. ALL THE SENTENCE RUN CONCURRENTLY NOT MENTIONED SYNOPSIS. 2. CRIME NO.
WRONGLY MENTIONED IN CAUSE TITLE. 3. NATURE OF CASE AND COURT NAME WRONGLY MENTIONED IN
CAUSE TITLE AND PRAYER. ]
2 of 6
,A.H. LOHIYA,S.O.
A.A. NEMAD, /
NO. 10.2 IN MEMO OF PETITION. (2)
C.R. WADEKAR. ]
HEMANT KESHARWANI ,SURESH TANDAN,KRISHNA
KUMAR DEWANGAN /
A.G.
[ ON DEFAULT OF- 1. SENTENCE IN U/S 323 IPC. WRONGLY MENTIONED IN SYNOPSIS AND CAUSE
TITLE. 2. DISTRICT NAME WRONGLY MENTIONED IN CAUSE TITLE. 3. USED MARKED (HIGHLIGHTER) IN
PAGE NO. 9. ]
MANOJ PARANJPE ,VAIBHAV A.GOVERDHAN,VIKRAM
DIXIT,PRIYANKA MEHTA /
A.G.
[ ON DEFAULT OF- 1. PARTICULAR WRONGLY MENTIONED IN PARA NO. 01 OF SYNOPSIS AND SUSPENSION
APPLICATION. 2. SUB SECTION NOT MENTIONED IN CAUSE TITLE. 3. NATURE OF CASE COMPLETELY NOT
MENTIONED IN CAUSE TITLE AND PRAYER. ]
21.
MCRC/5229/2014
GOVIND KUMAR HUNDUJA
VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
22.
MCRC/5234/2014
PINKU @ SHATRUGHAN PRASAD SAHU
VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
23.
MCRC/5244/2014
SATYANARAYAN DUBEY
VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
24.
MCRC/5248/2014
MOHAMMAD AARIF AND ANR.
VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
25.
MCRC/5250/2014
SANDEEP KUMAR
VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
26.
CRMP/877/2014
SANTU RAM
VISHNU KOSHTA ,NAROTTAM LAL VISHWAKARMA /
VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH & ORS. A.G.
[ ON DEFAULT OF- 1. CERTIFIED COPY OF ANNEX. A/1 NOT FILED WITH THE CASE BUT FILED AS TRUE
COPY. 2. ORDER DT. & CRIMINAL CASE NO. WRONGLY MENTIONED IN SYNOPSIS. ]
27.
CRMP/878/2014
HIRANAND BHAWNINI
VS. VIJAY MANUJA & ORS.
28.
MCRCA/1028/2014
AMIR SAI UIKE
A.K.PRASAD ,RISHI MAHOBIA,RAVI MAHOBIA /
VS. THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
A.G.
[ ON DEFAULT OF- 1. CO-ACCUSED INFORMATION NOT MENTIONED IN AFFIDAVIT AS PER FILING CLERK
REPORT. 2. PAGE NO. 9 TO 15 NOT CERTIFIED AS TRUE COPY. ]
29.
WP/2308/2002
30.
WP/4945/2004
3 of 6
ALOK KUMAR GUPTA ,JYOTI GUPTA,PREM
DEWANGAN,RAJENDRA PRATAP SINGH /
BILASPUR
A.G.
[ ON DEFAULT OF- 1. NAME OF POLICE STATION WRONGLY MENTIONED IN CAUSE TITLE & PARA NO. 03
OF THE CASE. 2. DATE OF ARREST OF THE ACCUSED/APPLICANT WRONGLY MENTIONED IN CAUSE TITLE &
PARA NO. 3 OF THE CASE. ]
JANAK RAM VERMA ,SANTOSH SAHU,SANTOSH
KUMAR VERMA /
BALODA BAZAR
A.G.
[ ON DEFAULT OF- 1. NATURE OF SPECIAL SESSION TRIAL NO. NOT MENTIONED COMPLETELY IN CAUSE
TITLE & PARA NO. 02. COMPUTER SHEET NOT FILED WITH THE CASE. ]
MANOJ PARANJPE ,VAIBHAV A.GOVERDHAN,VIKRAM
DIXIT,PRIYANKA MEHTA /
A.G.
[ ON DEFAULT OF- 1. COURT NAME WRONGLY MENTIONED IN PARA NO. 02 FOR CAUSE TITLE. 2.
RELATION WRONGLY MENTIONED IN PARA 4. 3. CO-ACCUSED INFORMATION WRONGLY MENTIONED IN
AFFIDAVIT AS PER FILING CLERK REPORT. 4. MARKED UNDERLINE IN CERTIFIED COPY. (MCRC 2672/14
ORDER) 5. TYPED COPY OF HAND WRITTEN NOT FILED. 6. AUTHORIZATION WRONGLY MENTIONED IN MEMO
OF APPEARANCE. 7. P.S. WRONGLY MENTIONED IN SYNOPSIS.
KISHORE BHADURI ,PAWAN
KESHARWANI,CHANDRESH SHRIVASTAVA /
A.G.
[ ON DEFAULT OF- 1. PARTICULAR WRONGLY MENTIONED IN SYNOPSIS. 2. PS. WRONGLY MENTIONED IN
SYNOPSIS. 3. STATUS OF BAIL WRONGLY MENTIONED IN WRONGLY MENTIONED IN CAUSE TITLE. ]
SHAILENDRA DUBEY ,ASHOK KUMAR
DUBEY,SHIVANG DUBEY /
A.G.
[ ON DEFAULT OF- 1. NAME & PLACE OF LEARNED COURT BELOW WHO REJECTION THE BAIL APPLICATION
OF APPLICANT, WRONGLY MENTIONED IN PARA NO. 02 OF THE CASE. ]
UPENDRA BHARAT ,RAJEEV BHARAT,NEERAJ
CHOUBEY /
A.G.
[ ON DEFAULT OF- 1. FATHER'S NAME OF RESPONDENT NO. 06 WRONGLY MENTIONED IN CAUSE TITLE.
2. APPLICATION DTD. ANNEX. P/5 WRONGLY MENTIONED IN INDEX & MEMO OF PETITION. ]
DEFAULT MATTERS
M/S R.G.FUELS
CL.PANDEY,PRITHA GHOSHAL ,ABHISHEK
VS. THE STATE OF M.P.& ORS.
SINHA,GHANSHYAM PATEL,MANOJ PARANJPE /
ND.DIWAN,A.G.,AVINASH MISHRA,VIMLESH
BAJPAI,SACHIN SINGH RAJPUT,AJAY
SHARMA,PRAVEEN DAS
[ NON COMPLIANCE OF HON'BLE COURT ORDER DTD. 22.04.2013 Rs. 3000/- HAS NOT BEEN DEPOSITED
IN HIGH COURT LEGAL AID COMMITTEE]
SURJIT SINGH SAHOTA
VS. S.E.C.L.& ORS.
RAHUL JHA ,GARY MUKHOPADHAYAY,RABINDRA
NATH MUKHOPADHYAY,ANAND KESHARWANI,ANURAG
SHRIVASTAVA /
V.R.TIWARI,VIVEK KUMAR VERMA,VINOD
DESHMUKH,ASHOK SONI,VIVEK KUMAR
AGRAWAL,GURU PRASAD KURRE
[ DEFAULT ON RES. NO. 01 (SECL) VAKALATNAMA FILED ON DT. 23.10.2013 BY SHRI V.R. TIWARI
(ADVOCATE) WITHOUT OBTAINING NOC FROM THE PREVIOUS COUNSEL FOR RES. NO.01 & O2 VAKALATNAMA
FILED ON 05.03.2005 BY SHRI VINOD DESHMUKH & ASSOCIATES & ARJ ORDER DT. 12.09.2014.]
31.
WP227/798/2009
MANOJ KUMAR SHUKLA
,B.P.SHARMA,M.L.SAKAT,AJIT SINGH /
VS. PHOOLCHAND KOTHARI & OTHERS ,SAMISHI SOLOMAN,
SIDDARTH,R.N.PUSTY,V.C.OTTALWAR,RAJEEV
SHRIVASTAVA,INDRA SEN SAHU,AKHATAR HUSSAIN
[ NON COMPLIANCE OF HON'BLE COURT ORDER DT. 02/09/2014 AMENDMENT INCORPORATED AND NON
FILING COND. OF DELAY IN AMENDMENT. ]
32.
WPC/800/2010
VODAFONE ESSAR SPACETEL LTD.
,SACHIN SINGH RAJPUT,ANUPAM DUBEY /
VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH & ORS. A.G., ASSTT.S.G.,JK.GUPTA,,ADITYA
SHARMA,PANKAJ AGRAWAL,ASHUTOSH SINGH
KACHHAWAHA,PAWAN KESHARWANI,RAHUL
TAMASKAR,KISHORE BHADURI,CHANDRESH
SHRIVASTAVA,SOURABH SHARMA,KASHIF SHAKEEL
[ NON FILING COND. OF DELAY IN PAPER BOOK AS PER HON'BLE COURT ORDER DT. 06/12/13.]
33.
CRR/174/2012
SHATRUHAN LAL
,S.K.DADSENA /
VS. RAGHVENDRA SARRAF
[FOR ORDERS ON DEFAULT OF P.F.]
34.
CONT/288/2014
LALIT KUMAR VERMA
AJAY SHRIVASTAVA ,BARUN KUMAR CHAKRABARTY
BILASPUR
VS. R.P. MANDAL & ANR.
/
[ FOR ORDERS ON DEFAULT : NON PAYMENT OF P.F. FOR R.NO.1 IN RAD MODE & R.NO.2 BOTH MODE AS
PER HON'BLE C.O. DT. 15/09/14 & P.F. PAID ON DT. 16/09/14 ORD MODE FOR R.NO.1 IS KEPT
BELOW. ]
35.
CONT/316/2014
DHAN SINGH PATEL
H.S.PATEL /
BILASPUR
VS. K. MURUGAN
[ FOR ORDERS ON DEFAULT : NON PAYMENT OF P.F. FOR R.NO. 1 IN RAD MODE AS PER HON'BLE C.O.
DT. 11/9/14] {P.F. PAID ON DT. 11/9/14 ONLY ORD. MODE IS KEPT BELOW}
36.
WP227/601/2014
ARCHANA KURRE
F.S.KHARE ,J.K. GUPTA /
VS. ARJUN SINGH BANJARE
[ ON DEFAULT OF : 1. STATUS OF PARTIES OF COURT BELOW NOT MENTIONED IN CAUSE TITLE OF
PETITION. 2. MEMO OF PETITION & CERTIFICATE NOT SIGNED BY SHRI F.S. KHARE COUNSEL FOR
PETITION. 3. APP. FOR I.R. NOT SIGNED BY COUNSEL FOR PETITION. 4. DATE NOT MENTIONED IN
APPLICATION FOR I.R. 5. ANNE P/1 NOT MARKED IN THE DOCUMENT. 6. VAKALATNAMA NOT SIGNED BY
SHRI J.K. GUPTA COUNSEL FOR PETITIONER AR(J) ORDER DATE 19/08/2014 ]
37.
WP227/611/2014
BASANT DEWANGAN ,ANUP MAJUMDAR /
GOUTAM BOSE & ORS.
VS. PRESIDING OFFICER CENTRAL
GOVE. INDUS. TRIBU. & ANR.
[ ON DEFAULT OF : 1. STATUS OF PARTIES OF COURT BELOW NOT MENTIONED IN CAUSE TITLE OF
PETITION. 2. AS PER CONTENTS MENTIONED IN PARA NO. 8.7 COPY OF ORDER DT 6/9/10 ( P/2) NOT
FILED WITH THE PETITION. 3. PAGE NO. 16 NOT FILED COMPLETELY WITH THE PETITION. ]
38.
WP227/619/2014
ABHIMANYU BEHRA @ TIKESHWAR
SUNIL SAHU /
BEHRA
VS. NAVEEN LAL & ORS.
[ FOR ORDER ON DEFAULT NON COMPLIANCE OF THE HON'BLE COURT ORDER DATE 26/08/2014 P.F.COPY
& DELAY APPLICATION HAS NOT BEEN FILED. ]
39.
WP227/714/2014
MOHAN YADU
VS. GOLU YADU
HEMANT GUPTA /
40.
WPS/3695/2014
KRISHAN GOPAL SHRIVASTAVA
VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH AND
ORS.
VIKASH A.SHRIVASTAVA ,BHARAT RAJPUT /
A.G.
4 of 6
RAIPUR
[ ON DEFAULT
OF - (1)
CERTIFIED
ORDER COPY OF
ANNEX. P/2
ORDER DT.
.1.03.12 NOT
FILED WITH THE
CASE & A.R.(J)
ORDER DT.19/9/2014 ]
(A.R.(J) ORDER
LIST NEXT
WEEK)
[ ON DEFAULT OF - (1) CERTIFIED ORDER COPY OF ANNEX. P/2 ORDER DT. .1.03.12 NOT FILED WITH
THE CASE & A.R.(J) ORDER DT.- 19/9/2014 ] (A.R.(J) ORDER LIST NEXT WEEK)
[ ON DEFAULT OF - (1) ONE DATE OF ANNEX. P/6 NOT SHOWN IN THE DOCUMENT
MENTIONED BUT SAME IS MENTIONED IN INDEX AND PARA NO. 8.9 OF PETITION.
P/7 WRONGLY MENTIONED IN SUBJECT MATTER AND PARA NO. 10.5 OF PETITION.
P/2 WRONGLY MENTIONED IN PARA NO. 8.5. (4) PARA NOS. WRONGLY MENTIONED
OF PETITION. (5) DATE OF ANNEX. P/4 WRONGLY MENTIONED IN PARA NO. 10.1
AR(J) ORDER DATED 26/08/2014 ]
BUT SAME IS
(2) DATE OF ANNEX.
(3) DATE OF ANNEX.
AFTER PARA NO. 8.9
OF PETITION. &
41.
WPS/4238/2014
KU.PRAGATI JHA
VARUN SHARMA ,JITENDRA PALI,AMAN
VS. INDIRA KALA SANGEET
KESHARWANI,BHAVANA PALI,SHAILJA SHUKLA /
VISHWAVIDYALAYA AND ORS.
,SHASHANK THAKUR
[ ON DEFAULT OF : 1. ANNE P/4 IS FAINT. 2. AS PER RELIEF SOUGHT SUB PARA NO. 2 COPY OF
ORDER DT. 15/07/2014 IS NOT FILED & AR(J) NOTE DATED 18.09.2014. ]
42.
WPS/4445/2014
PREMLAL SONI
SUNIL SAHU /
VS. THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH & A.G.
ORS.
[ FOR ORDER ON DEFAULT NON COMPLIANCE OF THE HON'BLE COURT ORDER ON 28/08/2014 P.F.COPYE &
DELAY APPLICATION HAS NOT BEEN FILED. ]
43.
WPS/4446/2014
RAJEEV DUBEY
VS. STATE OF
[ ON DEFAULT
AND PARA NO.
& ANR.
MANOJ KUMAR SINHA /
CHHATTISGARH & ORS. A.G.,MATEEN SIDDIQUI
OF - (1) CIRCULAR DATED 05.03.2008 NOT FILED WITH THE PETITION AS PER INDEX
8.7 OF PETITION. ]
44.
WPS/4795/2014
BADRI PRASAD
VS. STATE OF
ORS.
[ ON DEFAULT
VAKALATNAMA.
VERMA
CHHATTISGARH AND
SANTOSH SAHU ,JANAK RAM VERMA /
A.G.
OF - (1) COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONER SHRI J.R. VERMA NOT SIGNED IN
& ARJ ORDER DT. 11.09.2014. ]
45.
WA/261/2014
DHANARAM LAHRE
PARAG KOTECHA /
VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH & ORS. A.G.
[ ON DEFAULT OF - (1) COURT FEES OF RS. 5/- NOT AFFIXED IN CERTIFIED COPY OF ORDER. (2)
COPY OF APPEAL NOT SERVED TO REPRESENTATIVE COUNSEL IN WRIT PETITION. (3) CERTIFICATE
APPL. AND VAKALATNAMA NOT SIGNED BY SHRI PARAG KOTECHA COUNSEL FOR APPELLANT. (4) CONTENTS
OF PARA NO. 02 NOT MENTIONED COMPLETELY IN AFFIDAVIT & AS PER ARJ ORDER DT. 25/08/2014.]
46.
WA/263/2014
CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER, S.E.C.L. MEERA JAISWAL ,PREETI YADAV,PANKAJ AGRAWAL
/
AND ORS.
ANJU AHUJA
VS. ASHOK KUMAR GOND
[ FOR ORDERS ON DEFAULT FOR NON COMPLIANCE OF HON'BLE C.O. DT. 03/09/2014, REGARDING P.F.
& CONDONATION OF DELAY APPLICATION NOT FILED.] (WP 2208/01(D/O.) IS KEPT BELOW WITH
RECORD.)
47.
WA/271/2014
SAREENA KHAN ,MALAY KUMAR BHADURI /
B.B. SINGH
VS. THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH & A.G.
ORS.
[ ON DEFAULT OF - (1) C.F. RS. 05 IS NOT AFFIXED IN C.C. OF ORDER DATED 21.07.14. (2) C.F.
RS. 10 IS NOT AFFIXED IN VAKALATNAMA. (3) VAKALTNAMA NOT SIGNED BY THE COUNSEL SAREENA
KHAN. (4) PARA NO. OF THE GROUNDS IS WRONGLY MENTIONED IN MEMO OF APPEAL & AS PER AR(J)
ORDER DT. 25.08.2014 ]
48.
WA/317/2014
RAMKHILAWAN SAHU
VINOD DESHMUKH /
VS. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER CONSTRU. A.G.
& ANR.
[ ON DEFAULT OF - (1) COUNSEL FOR APPELLANT HAS NOT MADE PARTY RES. NO. 2 ADN 3 AS PER
WRIT PETITION NO. 1736/2002. (2) CERTIFIED COPY OF ORDER DT. 15.07.14 NOT FILED WITH THE
PETITION. (3) THE APPEAL IS 7 DAYS TIME BARRED AND COUNSEL FOR APPELLANT HAS NOT FILED. AN
APPLICATION FOR CONDO. OF DELAY WITH AFFIDAVIT. & ARJ ORDER DT. 10.09.2014]
49.
CRR/645/2014
ANKALU RAM SAHU
SAMIR SINGH ,ANIL GULATI,RISHI RAHUL SONI
BALOD
VS. RIKHIRAM AND ANR.
/
[ FOR ORDERS ON DEFAULT NO.1 DATE OF ANNEX. P/3 WONGLY MENTIONED IN PARA NO.1-4 OF MEMO OF
REVISION [2] COPY OF ORDER DATED 16.01.14 PASSED BY LEARNED JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE 1ST CLASS,
DONDI LOHARA, BALOD, IN COMPLAINT CASE NO.143/12 NOT FILED WITH THE CASE. [3]PAGE NO.15
FILED OF TWICE WITH THE CASE. [4] PAGE NO. 21 & 28 ARE NOT LEGIBLE & CLEAN COPY BUT TYPED
COPY OF THE SAME NOT FILED WITH THE CASE.]
50.
CRMP/628/2014
BALBHADRA SINGH
VIJAY K.DESHMUKH /
VS. UPENDRA KUMAR SINGH AND ORS.
5 of 6
KORBA
[ ON DEFAULT OF- 1. ANNEX. WRONGLY MENTIONED IN SYNOPSIS. 02. U/S OF LEAVE TO APPEAL NOT
MENTIONED. 03. U/S OF ACQUITTAL APPEAL WRONGLY MENTIONED. 04. U/S OF ACQUITTAL WRONGLY
MENTIONED IN CAUSE TITLE, PARA NO. 2, 7 AND PRAYER OF ACQUITTAL APPEAL. ]{U/S 378 SB} NEXT
WEEK
51.
6 of 6
CRMP/629/2014
BALBHADRA SINGH
VIJAY K.DESHMUKH /
KORBA
VS. DAHARAJ SINGH
[ ON DEFAULT OF- 1. ACQUITTAL APPEAL UNDER WRONGLY SECTION. 02. U/S OF LEAVE TO APPEAL NOT
MENTIONED. ]{U/S 378 SB} NEXT WEEK
BY ORDER OF HON'BLE THE CHIEF
JUSTICE
Sd/( SANGHRATNA BHATPAHARI )
ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR (J)
© Copyright 2025 ExpyDoc
