Teacher Evaluation – Standard VI Accountability Services North Carolina Department of Public Instruction September 23, 2014 Teacher Evaluation – Standard VI Tom Tomberlin Director, District HR Support Teacher Evaluation in NC • The North Carolina Educator Effectiveness System (NCEES) has six standards of performance for teachers and eight standards for principals. • NC has a conjunctive model, meaning that teachers and principals must be proficient (or better) on all standards in order to receive an overall effectiveness rating. We do not average or index these standards. • Unlike the observational standards, student growth (standard 6 for teacher, standard 8 for principals), requires three years of valid data in order to generate a rating. Standards 6 & 8 – The Basics Teachers 1 2 3 4 5 6 Demonstrate Establish Leadership Environment Know Content Facilitate Learning Contribute Reflect on Practice to Academic Success Principals (and other Administrators) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Strategic Leadership Instructional Leadership Cultural Leadership Human Resource Leadership Managerial Leadership External Development Leadership Micropolitical Leadership Academic Achievement Leadership 3-Year Rolling Average Teacher Rating from 2 years ago Standard Rating from 1 year ago Standard Rating from this year 1.0 + (-2.5) + 1.2 Standard Contribute to Academic Success 6 6 6 1.0 -2.5 1.2 Met Expected Growth Did not meet Met Expected Expected Growth Growth 3 = -0.3 Met Expected Growth 3- year average rating on standard 6 for determining status Note: A similar methodology applies to principals as well. Teacher Status 1. In Need of Improvement Standards 1-5 1 2 3 4 5 Demonstrate Leadership In the year Establish Environment Know Content Facilitate Learning Reflect on Practice Any rating lower than proficient and/or Three year rolling average ) Standards 6 2 years ago 6 + 1 year ago 6 + Does Not Meet Expected Growth 6) This year /3 Teacher Status 2. Effective Standards 1-5 1 2 3 4 5 Demonstrate Leadership In the year Establish Environment Know Content Facilitate Learning Reflect on Practice Proficient or Higher on Standards 1 - 5 and Three year rolling average ) Standard 6 2 years ago 6 + 1 year ago 6 + 6) This year Meets or Exceeds Expected Growth /3 Teacher Status 3. Highly Effective Standards 1-5 1 2 3 4 5 Demonstrate Leadership In the year Establish Environment Know Content Facilitate Learning Reflect on Practice Accomplished or Higher on Standards 1 - 5 and Three year rolling average ) Standard 6 2 years ago 6 + Exceeds Expected Growth 1 year ago 6 + 6) This year /3 Teacher Status – First Status • For all teachers (and principals) the first status for Standard 6 will be generated from the best two out of three valid Standard 6 ratings. • School-level growth that has been assigned to a teacher as a result of a waiver (from NCFEs or ASW) will function as a valid Standard 6 rating. • School-level growth that has been assigned as a result of a lack of data for a teacher (i.e., not from a waiver) will not count as a valid Standard 6 rating. Status Scenarios Rating from 2012-13 Rating from 2013-14 Rating from 2014-15 6 6 6 1.0 -2.5 1.2 Met Expected Growth Did not meet Met Expected Expected Growth Growth • • • Teacher has individual-level data for three years. Standard 6 from the 2013-14 school year is the lowest of the three ratings. Teacher’s Standard 6 status is 1.1 – “Meets Expected Growth”. Status Scenarios Rating from 2012-13 Rating from 2013-14 Rating from 2014-15 6 6 6 1.0 -2.5 Met Expected Growth Did not meet Met Expected Expected Growth Growth • • • 1.2 • Teacher has individual-level data for the first two years. The 2014-15 data is schoollevel growth from a waiver. Standard 6 from the 2013-14 school year is the lowest of the three ratings. Teacher’s Standard 6 status is 1.1 – “Meets Expected Growth”. Status Scenarios Rating from 2012-13 Rating from 2013-14 Rating from 2014-15 6 6 6 1.0 -2.5 Met Expected Growth Did not meet Met Expected Expected Growth Growth • • • 1.2 • Teacher has individual-level data for the final two years. The 2012-13 data is schoollevel growth because teacher did not have individual-level data. The teacher does not receive a status in the fall of 2015 because teacher does not have 3 years of valid data. First status in Fall 2016 (provided teacher has valid data in SY 2015-16). Status Scenarios – Second Year Rating from 2012-13 Rating from 2013-14 Rating from 2014-15 Rating from 2015-16 • • 6 6 6 6 1.0 -2.5 1.2 Met Expected Growth Did not meet Met Expected Expected Growth Growth 4.0 Exceeded Expected Growth • • Teacher receives second status in fall of 2016. Rating from 201213 “rolls off”. Rating from 201314 returns to the rolling average (even though it was dropped from prior year’s calculation). Teacher’s status is “Meets Expected Growth” with an average of 0.9.
© Copyright 2024 ExpyDoc
