The Use of Dehydrated Human Amnion/Chorion Membrane (dHACM) Allografts to Expedite Healing in Patients with Five Major Types of Refractory Non-Healing Wounds: A Cohort Study Darshan Nagesh, DPM; Robin Lenz, DPM; Hannah Park, DPM; Patrick Sanchez, DPM; Sarah Park, DPM; Jake Ruff, DPM; Matthew Garoufalis, DPM, FASPS, FACFAOM, CWS Jesse Brown Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Chicago, IL Desert Foot, November 19-21, 2014, Phoenix, AZ Background Methods Chronic non-healing wounds including diabetic foot ulcers (DFU), venous stasis ulcers (VSU), pressure ulcers (PU), ischemic ulcers (IU), and surgical wounds (SW) pose a significant economic burden on the society. Human amniotic membrane has been used in a variety of surgical procedures and in wound healing for many decades. Amniotic membrane is a non-vascular tissue consisting of epithelium cells, basement membrane, a thick compact layer and fibroblast layer. The fibrous layer contains cell anchoring collagen types: I, III, IV, V, and VII. Biochemical properties of the membrane help to reduce inflammation and enhance soft tissue healing. Study design Retrospective chart review from a podiatric surgery clinic of a single medical center. Included 66 patients with lower extremity wounds (DFU, VSU, IU, PU, SW) who failed (<50% reduction) with Standard of Care for 4 weeks. Treatment Weekly application of dHACM after sharp/mechanical debridement as deemed necessary in conjunction with offloading (PU, DFU, SW), compression therapy (VSU), and vascular surgical intervention/ArtAssist® as deemed appropriate for IU. Weekly dressing change and graft application was performed in our outpatient clinic. Analysis Weekly wound measurements were obtained post debridement in the clinic during follow-up visits. Rate of closure using dHACM was calculated for the five major types of wounds. Percent area reduction to current date was calculated for wounds not completely epithelialized. Dehydrated Human Amnion/Chorion Membrane (dHACM) Dehydrated human amnion/chorion membrane (dHACM) allografts have become a popular commercially available skin substitute.1 The material is cleaned, dehydrated, and sterilized by the proprietary PURION® Process that produces an easy to use allograft with a 5 year shelf life at ambient conditions.1 PURION® Processed dHACM has been shown to retain biological activities related to wound healing, including the potential to positively affect four distinct and pivotal physiological processes intimately involved in wound healing: cell proliferation, inflammation, metalloproteinase activity, and recruitment of progenitor cells.2 Randomized controlled trials and clinical studies have established dHACM as an effective treatment for diabetic foot ulcers and venous leg ulcers.3-6 Purpose The main purpose of this study is to show the effectiveness of dHACM in treating refractory non-healing wounds of various etiologies. dHACM = AmnioFix® and EpiFix,® MiMedx Group, Inc., Marietta, GA AmnioFix®, EpiFix®, and PURION® are registered trademarks of MiMedx Group, Inc. ArtAssist® is a registered trademark of ACI Medical Management, Inc. Results Table 1. Summary of healing in patients with 5 major types of wounds. Wound Type Total # of Patients # of Patients with Complete Data Average Age of Wound (wks) Neuropathic (DFU) 18 14 22.9 .75 cm2 4 Venous stasis ulcers (VSU) 17 16 23.1 3.94 cm2 5.19 Pressure Ulcers (PU) 7 6 9.1 8.35 cm2 8.66 Ischemic Ulcers (IU) 3 3 5.3 .23 cm2 3 Surgical wounds (SW) 21 20 11.2 7.22 cm2 6.1 66 59 16.9 4.41 cm2 5.4 Overall Pre dHACM Average Wound Average # of dHACM to Heal Size Healed Case 1. Surgical Wound Results Overall, the average wound size was 4.41 cm2. Of the 66 patients, 6 patients were not included secondary to either loss to follow-up or complications. One patient with a PU was being treated with dHACM at the time of chart review and showed a 91.7% size reduction after 6 consecutive weekly applications. There were statistical differences in the average size of the wounds between the major wound types in our cohort (p=0.0015), and a statistically significant difference in the number of applications to wound healing between the groups of major wound types (p=0.0004). Conclusion dHACM can significantly expedite healing in different types of refractory wounds concomitantly while addressing the underlying etiology of the wounds. Case 2. Surgical Wound References Case 3. DFU 1. Fetterolf DE, Snyder RJ. Scientific and clinical support for the use of dehydrated amniotic membrane in wound management. Wounds 2012;24(10):299-307. 2. Koob TJ, Rennert R, Zabek N, et al. Biological properties of dehydrated human amnion/chorion composite graft: implications for chronic wound healing. Int Wound J 2013 Oct;10(5):493-500. 3. Zelen CM. An evaluation of dehydrated human amniotic membrane allografts in patients with DFUs. J Wound Care. 2013a;22(7):347-348, 350-351. 4. Zelen CM, Serena TE, Denoziere G, Fetterolf DE. A prospective randomized comparative parallel study of amniotic membrane wound graft in the management of diabetic foot ulcers. Int Wound J. 2013;10(5):502-507. 5. Zelen CM, Serena TE, Snyder RJ. A prospective, randomised comparative study of weekly versus biweekly application of dehydrated human amnion/chorion membrane allograft in the management of diabetic foot ulcers. Int Wound J. 2014;11(2):122-128. 6. Serena TE, Carter MJ, Le TL, Sabo MJ, DiMarco DT. A Multi-center Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Evaluating the Use of Dehydrated Human Amnion/Chorion Membrane Allografts and Multi-layer Compression Therapy vs. Multi-layer Compression Therapy Alone in the Treatment of Venous Leg Ulcers. Wound Repair and Regeneration. 2014 Sept 15. (epub).
© Copyright 2024 ExpyDoc