TE Details

TECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT
CORROSION INHIBITOR
,
0
.
CASE NO: PROC-FAlCBIWS/CHEM-96712013
f"
CORROSION
INHIBITOR:
30,000 L TR
"'
SNO.
BIDDER'S NAME
LOCAL AGENT
TECHNICALLY
RESPONSIVE
(yESINO)
1.
MIS Global Drilling Fluids &
Chemicals Ltd. India
MIs Imco Technologies
& Services. Islamabad
YES
2.
MIs Oil Gas Industries
Services Uk.
MIs Pak Engineering
Limited. Islamabad.
NO
3.
MIs Production Chemicals
Ltd. Ireland.
MIs Production
Chemicals Ltd.
Islamabad
NO
REASONS FOR REJECTION
"-
~
4.
MIs Puvana Jiahua Chemical
Company Limited. China.
'~
MIs Speciality
Chemicals Company
Limited. Islamabad
~
NO
The Bidder MIs Oil & Gas Industries Services Limited, London
declared the price in their Technical Proposal. In succession of
Para 36-(b)(V) of PPRA, rules, ED(Services) kindly approved
to reject the bid of MIs OGIS, London and subsequently their
Technical proposal got disqualified.
The sample submitted with bid doesn't conform to the
Technical Specifications given in the Tender Documents
~
The sample submitted with bid doesn't conform to the
Technical Specifications given in the Tender Documents.
~
The 3rd Party Lab report submitted of MIs Intertek Laboratory,
Karachi is not coherent with the technical spec sheet IProduct
Data Memorandum (PDM) duly submitted with bid .
~
The Bidder didn't provide the Original Authority Letter duly
signedl stamped from the Manufacturer, MIs Messina
Incorporated USA, despite a clarification E-mail, dated 01-042014.
The Chemical Analysis Report from 3rd Party Lab has not been
provided with the submitted bid.
•••1(
~~.
~\\.\~
',(\
~
'.
MIs Industrial Equipment
Services. Canada.
MIs I.E. Services.
Islamabad
NO
~
~
~
The ISO 9001 :2008 certificate submitted with the bid is not for
manufacturing of the quoted product rather it is for "Distribution
& supply of products."
The sample
submitted
T .•...•.•.....
h •..•
i,... ....•I ~ •..•
~,...ih,...""30ti
•...•
f""'Ic
with
ni\l~n
in
bid doesn't
conform
th,:::.T~nrlpr
nnC:lJrnents
to the
-
6.
MIs Mol.Overseas Ltd.
Karachi.
MIs M.1.Overseas Ltd.
Karachi.
MIS Ninabo Sino-Resources
Imports & Exports Company
Limited, China.
MIs Shezad
International,
Islamabad.
NO
~ The Client reference list provided with the bid is not in
conformance with tender requirement. The list constitutes only
04 clients with less than 50 Gallons supply record.
t
~ The Chemical Analysis Report from
provided with the submitted bid.
3rd
Party Lab has not been
"
7.
8.
MIs Baker Hughes EHO
Limited, Dubai UAE.
MIs Baker Hughes EHO
Limited, Islamabad.
YES
.
NO
~ The bidde M/s Baker Hughes EHO Ltd. has added their own
"Legal Exceptions" to OGDCLTerms & Conditions at Clause-Ol,
of Bidding Form(Annexure-B) submitted with their bid which is
violation/deviation of Tender Requirement. Each Bidder has to
accept all the tender terms & conditions.
~ The Chemical Analysis Report of product from
not been provided with the submitted bid.
3rd
Party Lab has
~ The Chemical Analysis Report of quoted product from 3rd Party
Lab has not been provided with the submitted bid.
~
~ The sample submitted with bid doesn't conform to the Technical
Specifications given in the Tender Documents
9.
,
MIs Ennor Muds &
Chemicals , India
MIs Evergreen
Chemical International
Co. Islamabad
NO
~ As per clause-OS of TOR/Instructions to The Bidders , The
previous performance/track record
of the bidder is not
satisfactory as The Bidder M/s Ennor Mud Chemicals have
backed-off
by not submitting
Performance Bank
the
Guarantee(PBG) in 100.0 MTON case of Xanthan Gum against
TE # PROC-FAICBIW5ICHEM-68012012 after accepting LOI
and OGDCLsubsequently had to annul the case.
~

Download Report