ATLAS COLLABORATION CERN-RRB-2014-054 Addendum No. 15 to the Memorandum of Understanding for Collaboration in the Construction of the ATLAS Detector Upgrade of the Trigger and Data Acquisition System 17.03.2014 Page 1 ATLAS COLLABORATION 17.03.2014 CERN-RRB-2014-054 Page 2 ATLAS COLLABORATION CERN-RRB-2014-054 Considering that: The construction of the ATLAS Detector is governed by a Memorandum of Understanding, along with its Amendments and Addenda, setting out the responsibilities of the different participating Institutes and Funding Agencies for the construction of the ATLAS Detector 1 (Construction MoU); Maintenance and Operation of the ATLAS Detector is governed by a Memorandum of Understanding for Maintenance and Operation (M&O MoU) 2; In order to be able to take full advantage of planned luminosity upgrades of the LHC, the ATLAS Collaboration has proposed an Upgrade Program of the ATLAS Detector, consisting of a set of modifications and replacements of existing Sub-Detectors as well as new additions to the Detector; As part of the Upgrade Program, the ATLAS Collaboration has proposed an upgrade of the Trigger and Data Acquisition (TDAQ) System; On the basis of a Letter of Intent 3 and Technical Design Report 4 submitted in December 2011 and September 2013 and a detailed review of the scientific merits, the technological feasibility and estimates of the resources needed, the LHC Committee (LHCC) has recommended approval of the TDAQ Upgrade to the CERN Research Board; Based on the recommendation by the LHCC, the Research Board has recommended to the Director General of CERN to approve the TDAQ Upgrade; The Director General has accepted the Research Board recommendation and approved the TDAQ Upgrade. It is agreed as follows Memorandum of Understanding for Collaboration in the Construction of the ATLAS Detector (RRB-D 98-44 rev.) 2 Memorandum of Understanding for Maintenance and Operation of the ATLAS Detector (CERN-RRB-2002-035) 3 ATLAS Letter of Intent, Phase-I Upgrades (CERN-LHCC-2011-012) 4 ATLAS TDAQ Upgrade Technical Design Report (CERN-LHCC-2013-018) 1 17.03.2014 Page 3 ATLAS COLLABORATION CERN-RRB-2014-054 Article 1: Purpose 1.1 The purpose of this Addendum and its Annexes is to lay down the terms of participation of the contributing Institutes and Funding Agencies in the construction, installation and commissioning of the TDAQ System Upgrade in conformity with the Construction MoU along with its amendments and addenda. 1.2 All the Annexes are an integral part of this Addendum. Article 2: Parties 2.1 The Parties to this Addendum shall be all the Institutes that are contributing to the upgrade of the TDAQ System (the TDAQ Upgrade Institutes) and their Funding Agencies (the TDAQ Upgrade Funding Agencies), and CERN as the Host Laboratory. The current list of TDAQ Upgrade Institutes is given in Annex 1 and the current list of TDAQ Upgrade Funding Agencies and Contacts is given in Annex 2. Article 3: Duration 3.1 This Addendum takes effect from the date of signature and shall remain valid until the ATLAS Management declares the end of TDAQ System Upgrade. 3.2 Any TDAQ Upgrade Institute may withdraw its support from the TDAQ System Upgrade by giving not less than eighteen months notice in writing. In this event, reasonable compensation to TDAQ System Upgrade shall be negotiated through the ATLAS Management and endorsed by the RRB. 3.3 Any Institute that joins the TDAQ Upgrade Institutes after the start of the TDAQ System Upgrade shall accept the agreements in force and shall be expected to make an appropriate contribution to the TDAQ System Upgrade as shall be specified in a corresponding Addendum to this Addendum. This shall be negotiated by the ATLAS Management and endorsed by the RRB. Article 4: The TDAQ System Upgrade 4.1 The TDAQ System Upgrade is defined in detail in the Letter of Intent and in the Technical Design Report submitted to the LHCC. The TDAQ System Upgrade consists of a number of sub-units as listed in Annex 3. 17.03.2014 Page 4 ATLAS COLLABORATION CERN-RRB-2014-054 4.2 The current management structure of the TDAQ System Upgrade is described in Annex 4, as well as persons currently holding management positions. 4.3 The technical participation of the TDAQ Upgrade Institutes is given in Annex 3. 4.4 The ATLAS Collaboration decides for each TDAQ System Upgrade cost item whether the cost is to be borne at the common expense of the ATLAS Collaboration or not. The TDAQ System Upgrade cost items are thereby divided into two categories: 4.4.1. Common Items, comprising those costs that the ATLAS Collaboration has agreed to bear at its common expense; 4.4.2. Specific items that are the responsibility of the TDAQ Upgrade Institutes or groups of TDAQ Upgrade Institutes. 4.5 Annex 5 shows the value of the deliverables by Funding Agency, to which the TDAQ Upgrade Institutes and TDAQ Upgrade Funding Agencies are committed and for which they have foreseen the appropriate funding. 4.6 Annex 6 gives the required CORE spending profile. 17.03.2014 Page 5 ATLAS COLLABORATION CERN-RRB-2014-054 ANNEXES Annex 1: List of TDAQ Upgrade Institutes and Contact Persons Annex 2: List of TDAQ Upgrade Funding Agencies and Contact Persons Annex 3: List of TDAQ Upgrade sub-units and deliverables to be provided by the TDAQ Upgrade Institutes and Funding Agencies Annex 4: TDAQ Upgrade Management Structure and Persons currently holding management positions Annex 5: Value of Deliverables, grouped by Funding Agency, of the TDAQ System Upgrade Annex 6: CORE Spending profile 17.03.2014 Page 6 ATLAS COLLABORATION CERN-RRB-2014-054 The European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) and ................................................. declare that they agree on the Present Addendum to the Memorandum of Understanding for Collaboration in the Construction of the ATLAS Detector Done in Geneva Done in ............................. ............................................ ............................................ for CERN for ...................................... ............................................ ............................................ <CERN name> <CERN title> ............................................ ............................................ ............................................ 17.03.2014 Page 7 ATLAS COLLABORATION 17.03.2014 CERN-RRB-2014-054 Page 8 ATLAS COLLABORATION CERN-RRB-2014-054 Annex 1: List of TDAQ Upgrade Institutes and Contact Persons Institute Argonne National Laboratory, USA Contact Person Robert Blair University of Arizona, USA Ken Johns University of Birmingham, United Kingdom Alan Watson Brookhaven National Laboratory (Brookhaven BNL), USA Srini Rajagopalan National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering (IFIN-HH), Bucharest (Bucharest IFIN-HH) , Romania Mihai Caprini Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, UK Mark Andrew Thomson Nick Ellis European Laboratory for Particle Physics, CERN, Switzerland Niels Bohr Institute (Copenhagen NBI), University of Copenhagen, Denmark AGH University of Science and Technology and Jagiellonian University (Cracow AGH/UJ ), and Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences (Cracow IFJ PAN), Poland Harvard University, Department of Physics, USA Stefania Xella Kirchhoff-Institut fur Physik, Heidelberg (Heidelberg KIP), Germany Hans-Christian Schultz-Coulon KEK, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization, Japan Osamu Sasaki Kobe University, Japan Hisaya Kurashige Kyoto University, Department of Physics, Japan Masaya Ishino Universidad Nacional de La Plata (UNLP), Argentina Maria Teresa Dova Institut fuer Physik, Universitaet Mainz, Germany Volker Büscher Michigan State University (Michigan SU), Department of Physics and Astronomy, USA Jim Linnemann M.V.Lomonosov Moscow State University (Moscow SU), Russia Serguei Sivoklokov Graduate School of Science and Kobayashi-Maskawa Institute, Nagoya University, Japan Makoto Tomoto INFN Napoli and Universita' di Napoli, Dipartimento di Fisica, Napoli, Italy Vincenzo Izzo FOM - Institute SAF Nikhef and University of Amsterdam/Nikhef, Netherlands Joseph Vermeulen University of Oregon, USA Eric Torrence Laboratório de Instrumentação e Física Experimental de Partículas (LIP), Portugal (Portugal 1-LIP) Patricia Conde Muíño Rutherford Appleton Laboratory (RAL), UK Robin Middleton 17.03.2014 Tomasz Bold John Huth Page 9 ATLAS COLLABORATION CERN-RRB-2014-054 Universidade Federal do Rio De Janeiro UF, COPPE/EE/I, Brazil Jose Seixas INFN Roma and Sapienza Universita' di Roma (Roma I), Dipartimento di Fisica, Italy Riccardo Vari INFN Roma Tor Vergata and Universita' di Roma Tor Vergata (Roma II), Dipartimento di Fisica, Italy Rinaldo Santonico Stockholm University, Sweden Sten Hellman International Center for Elementary Particle Physics and Department of Physics, The University of Tokyo (Tokyo ICEPP), Japan Hiroshi Sakamoto Universidad Antonio Narino, Centro de Investigaciones, Bogota (UAN Bogota), Colombia The Weizmann Institute of Science, Israel Marta Losada 17.03.2014 Lorne Levinson Page 10 ATLAS COLLABORATION CERN-RRB-2014-054 Annex 2: List of TDAQ Upgrade Funding Agencies and Contacts Funding Agency Country National Contact Physicist Argentina Brazil Argentina Brazil Maria-Teresa Dova Fernando Marroquim Colciencias CERN Denmark Colombia Switzerland Denmark Marta Losada Giuseppe Mornacchi Jorn Dines Hansen Germany BMBF INFN Germany Karl Jakobs Italy Anna Di Ciaccio Israel Japan Israel Japan Giora Mikenberg Katsuo Tokushuku, Tomio Kobayashi Netherlands Poland Netherlands Poland Paul de Jong Barbara Wosiek Portugal Romania Portugal Romania Amelia Maio Calin Alexa Russia Sweden United Kingdom Russia Sweden United Kingdom USA Alexander Zaitsev Bengt Lund-Jensen Stephen Lloyd USA 17.03.2014 Srinivasan Rajagopalan, Jim Cochran Institutes La Plata Rio de Janeiro UF UAN Bogota CERN Copenhagen NBI Heidelberg KIP, Mainz Napoli, Roma I, Roma II Weizmann KEK, Kobe, Kyoto, Nagoya, Tokyo ICEPP Nikhef Cracow AGH/UJ, Cracow IFJ PAN Portugal 1-LIP Bucharest IFINHH Moscow SU Stockholm Birmingham, Cambridge, RAL Argonne, Arizona, Brookhaven BNL, Harvard, Michigan SU, Oregon Page 11 ATLAS COLLABORATION CERN-RRB-2014-054 Annex 3: List of TDAQ Upgrade Sub-Units 1.0 1.1 Central Trigger Central Trigger Processor 1.2 Level-1 Topology processor 1.3 MuCTPi 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.4 2.5 Level-1 Calorimeter Trigger eFEX system jFEX system Hub, ROD and Optical Plant(HRO) Tile Input 2.6 2.7 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 4.0 4.1 PreProcessor nMCM Extended Merger Module (CMX) Level-1 Muon Trigger End-cap Sector Logic Tile D-layer Muon Interface NSW Trigger Processor Barrel MUCTPI Interface DAQ/HLT Dataflow 17.03.2014 New CTP-CORE and CTP-OUT modules for the Central Trigger Processor Level-1 Topological Trigger and MuCTPI-Topo modules New MuCTPI to interface the upgraded Muon Trigger to the Central Trigger Processor eFEX and jFEX systems, including Hub and ROD modules and Optical Plant PreProcessor LCD and JEM daughter boards (Tile input) Preprocessor new Multi-Chip Modules Extended Merger (CMX) modules Barrel EndCap Sector Logic modules D-Layer Muon interface modules Muon New Small Wheel Trigger processor Barrel Sector Logic - MuCTPI interface FELIX readout system and associated networking; Updated SFO hardware platform Page 12 ATLAS COLLABORATION CERN-RRB-2014-054 MoU Item 1.0 Central Trigger Description: Design and construction of new CTP-CORE and CTP-OUT modules for the Central Trigger Processor, L1Topo modules for the Topological Trigger, and new MuCTPI and MuCTPI-Topo modules to interface the upgraded Muon Trigger to the Central trigger processor, with associated firmware. Total Cost 1.1 1.2 1.3 kCHF 90.0 424.3 342.0 856.3 CTP-CORE and CTP-OUT modules L1Topo and MuCTPI-Topo Modules MUCTPI modules Work Responsibility CERN Copenhagen NBI Cracow Mainz Nikhef Design and production of CTP-CORE and MuCTPI modules Design and production of CTP-OUT modules L1Topo ROD firmware Design and production of L1Topology system Design and production of MUCTPI-Topo module Cost Sharing CERN (Switzerland) Copenhagen (Denmark) Mainz (Germany BMBF) Nikhef(Netherlands) Total 17.03.2014 CTP Modules 67% 33% 100% L1Topo 82% 18% 100% MuCTPi 100% 100% Total 47% 4% 41% 9% 100% Page 13 ATLAS COLLABORATION CERN-RRB-2014-054 MoU Item 2.0 Level-1 Calorimeter Trigger Description: Design and construction of eFEX and jFEX systems, including Hub and ROD modules and Optical Plant; Design and construction of PreProcessor LCD and JEM daughter boards (Tile input) ; Design and construction of Preprocessor nMCMs; and Design and construction of Extended Merger (CMX) modules, all with associated firmware. Total Cost 2.1 2.2 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 kCHF 1,390.6 637.0 700.5 122.5 500.0 153.6 3,504.2 eFEX system jFEX system Hub, ROD and Optical Plant (HRO) Tile Input PreProcessor nMCM Extended Merger Module (CMX) Work Responsibility Birmingham Cambridge Cracow Heidelberg KIP Mainz Michigan SU Oregon RAL Stockholm Combined eFEX/jFEX test module; eFEX (algorithmic) firmware ROD mezzanine; eFEX ROD firmware jFEX ROD firmware nMCM hardware and firmware; Preprocessor LCD Daughterboard and firmware JEM Daughterboard and firmware ; jFEX system hardware and firmware CMX hardware and Firmware ; Common eFEX/jFEX Hub module; Optical Plant FEX algorithm firmware eFEX hardware, eFEX infrastructure Firmware; DCS Firmware Tile Input firmware; JEM Daughterboard and firmware Cost Sharing eFEX Heidelberg KIP, Mainz (BMBF) Copenhagen NBI (Denmark) Cracow(Poland) Birmingham, Cambridge, RAL (UK) Stockholm (Sweden) Michigan SU, Oregon (USA) Total 17.03.2014 jFEX 100% 100% HRO Tile-in 59% 16% 14% 17% nMCM 100% CMX 41% 100% 100% 53% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Page 14 Total 35% 3% 3% 43% 1% 15% 100% ATLAS COLLABORATION CERN-RRB-2014-054 MoU Item 3.0 Level-1 Muon Trigger Description: Design and construction of End-cap Sector Logic modules, Tile D-Layer Muon interface modules, the Muon New Small Wheel Trigger processor, and the Barrel Sector Logic - MuCTPI interface, with associated firmware. Total Cost 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 kCHF 500.0 264.8 679.7 72.8 1,517.3 End-cap Sector Logic Tile D-layer Muon Interface NSW Trigger Processor Barrel Sector Logic - MuCTPI interface Work Responsibility Arizona Brookhaven BNL Bucharest CERN Harvard KEK Kobe Kyoto Nagoya Napoli Portugal LIP Rio de Janeiro UF Roma I Roma II Saclay Tokyo ICEPP UC Irvine Weizmann 17.03.2014 NSW Trigger processor hardware NSW Trigger processor hardware NSW Trigger processor hardware Tile D-Layer infrastructure Micromegas Trigger processor firmware Sector logic and Tile D-Layer interface Hardware design and construction Sector logic hardware design and trigger firmware; Tile D-layer firmware Sector logic Firmware; Tile D-layer interface hardware and firmware Sector logic hardware design and trigger firmware Barrel MuCTPi board optical link and interface with the RODbus Tile D-Layer hardware & firmware design and construction Tile D-layer hardware & firmware design and construction Barrel MuCTPI Board layout and firmware Barrel MuCTPI Board interface with Sector Logic Micromegas Trigger processor firmware Endcap Sector Logic hardware design and readout firmware; NSW Trigger processor firmware NSW Trigger Processor sTGC Trigger processor firmware Page 15 ATLAS COLLABORATION CERN-RRB-2014-054 Cost Sharing Rio de Janeiro UF (Brazil) CERN Copenhagen NBI (Denmark) Weizmann (Israel) Napoli, Roma I, Roma II (Italy) KEK, Kobe, Kyoto, Nagoya, Tokyo ICEPP (Japan) Sector Logic 100% Tile-D 30% 11% 9% 17.03.2014 11% 100% 45% BarrelMuCTPi 51% 38% Nikhef (Netherlands) Bucharest (Romania) Portugal LIP (Portugal) Arizona, Brookhaven BNL, Harvard (USA) Total NSW Trig 100% Total 5% 2% 2% 20% 2% 40% 15% 49% 2% 7% 2% 18% 100% 100% 40% 100% Page 16 ATLAS COLLABORATION CERN-RRB-2014-054 MoU Item 4.0 DAQ and High-Level trigger Description: Development of FELIX readout system and associated networking; Selection of SFO hardware platform. Total Cost 4.1 kCHF 1,263.5 1,263.5 Dataflow Work Responsibility CERN Nikhef Weizmann Argonne, Brookhaven BNL SFO server Design, Design and production of FELIX hardware Design and Production of FELIX hardware and firmware Design and Production of FELIX hardware and firmware Design and Production of FELIX firmware Cost Sharing La Plata (Argentina) Bogota (Colombia) CERN Weizmann (Israel) Nikhef (Netherlands) Moscow SU(Russia) UK Total 17.03.2014 Dataflow 4% 8% 26% 8% 35% 8% 12% 100% Total 4% 8% 26% 8% 35% 8% 12% 100% Page 17 ATLAS COLLABORATION CERN-RRB-2014-054 Annex 4 : TDAQ Organisation and Management Structure The TDAQ Organization operates under the control and guidance of the ATLAS Collaboration Management Structure as defined in Annex 5 of the ATLAS Construction MoU[2]. The current TDAQ Management Structure organization chart is shown in Figure 1. ATLAS Upgrade Steering Committee ATLAS Executive Board Trigger DAQ Project Leader Trigger & DAQ Institute Board Level-1 Calorimeter management FTK Institute Board Level-1 upgrade coordinator Software coordinator Fast Tracker (FTK) coordinator Other representation System run coordinator(s) Central Trigger DAQ/HLT coordination (inc. FELIX) Level-1 coordination Trigger CTP Level-1 Muon Level-1 Calorimeter eFEX jFEX CMX MUCTPI Endcap NSW trigger processors Barrel Tile D-layer nMCM Topology Figure 1: Current TDAQ Organisation TDAQ is led by a TDAQ Management Team (TDMT) of two members with complementary roles, each member being elected by the Trigger and DAQ Institute Board (TDIB) according to ATLAS rules and serving a two year term. The terms of office are arranged in antiphase, the TDMT member in their second year of office acting as the TDAQ Project Leader. The TDAQ Project Leader is a member of the Executive Board and directly responsible to the ATLAS Executive Board and Upgrade Steering Committee for all aspects of the TDAQ upgrade. The major construction work in the TDAQ upgrade is related to the Level-1 Trigger, and falls under the responsibility of the Level-1 Upgrade Coordinator. This person reports to the ATLAS Upgrade Steering Committee together with the TDAQ Project Leader, and also reports to the TDMT and the TDAQ Steering Group. Overall coordination of the work for the TDAQ upgrade is provided by the TDAQ Steering Group, whose structure may evolve after the LS1 work is completed. The members are coordinators of the major TDAQ activities. The 17.03.2014 Page 18 ATLAS COLLABORATION CERN-RRB-2014-054 composition is proposed by the TDMT and endorsed by the TDAQ Institute Board. The current members include system run coordinators, coordinators of Level1 Calorimeter Trigger, Level-1 Central Trigger, Level-1 Muon Endcap and Barrel Trigger, DAQ/HLT, TDAQ Software Coordination, Level-1 Track Trigger, Fast Track Processor (FTK), Physics (representative in Upgrade Physics Steering Group), Upgrade Simulation, Upgrade Detector Readout, and ATLAS Trigger coordination. Institutes participating in the upgrade by providing financial resources or staff attend the TDIB on an equal basis with institutes participating in operation of the running TDAQ system. The TDIB takes decisions on major technical issues and on sharing of resources and responsibilities, following recommendations from the TDAQ Steering Group and TDAQ Management. Persons holding TDAQ Upgrade-related Management Positions Position TDMT and current PL TDMT Level-1 Upgrade Coordinator TDIB Chair Name D. Francis D. Strom S. Veneziano N. Gee Institute CERN Oregon Rome I RAL Level-1Calorimeter Trigger coordination Level-1 Muon Trigger coordination R. Stamen B. Barnett R. Vari O. Sasaki T. Pauly Heidelberg KIP RAL Rome I KEK CERN R. Hauser F. Winklmeier MSU Oregon Central Trigger Processor coordination DAQ/HLT Software Coordinator Trigger Software Coordinator 17.03.2014 Page 19 ATLAS COLLABORATION CERN-RRB-2014-054 Annex 5: Deliverables to be provided by TDAQ Upgrade Funding Agencies (CORE cost, kCHF) 1.0 Central Trigger Funding Agency Argentina Brazil CERN Colombia Denmark Germany BMBF Israel Italy INFN Japan Netherlands Poland Portugal Romania Russia Sweden UK USA Total 17.03.2014 CTP L1Topo 60 2.0 Level-1 Calorimeter Trigger MuCTPi eFEX jFEX HRO Tile-in nMCM CMX 80 30 342 30 115 346 637 25 72 500 306 500 100 78 100 30 102 50 1391 90 424 342 1391 637 118 368 701 122 500 154 154 4.0 DAQ/HLT Data Total flow 50 50 80 325 757 100 100 170 1556 97 403 37 37 600 36 436 550 100 30 102 100 100 50 155 1664 793 73 1263 7142 3.0 Level-1 Muon Trigger NSW Barrel Sector Tile-D Trig MuCTPi Logic 500 265 272 680 Page 20 ATLAS COLLABORATION CERN-RRB-2014-054 Annex 6: CORE Spending Profile 17.03.2014 Page 21
© Copyright 2024 ExpyDoc