3D Printing for Packaging and Pharmaceticals

Pharma EXPO
2 – 5 November 2014
Chicago, IL
3D Printing for
Packaging and
Pharmaceticals
Jay Beversdorf
Application Engineer
Stratasys
11/3/2014
Agenda
• About Stratasys
• Concept/Functional Prototyping
• Manufacturing Tools
– Injection Molding
– Thermoforming
– End of Arm Tools
• End Use Parts
• Intersection of 3D Printing and Pharma
1
Pharma EXPO
2 – 5 November 2014
Chicago, IL
Quick Facts About Stratasys
• Headquartered in Minnesota, US and Rehovot, Israel
• Global workforce of over 1800+ employees
• Global partner Network of over 260 resellers and agents
• $487M combined revenue (2013)
• 550 granted or pending additive manufacturing patents globally
• Over 75,818 cumulative systems sold (Dec. 2013)
• Over 25 technology and leadership awards
Traditional Mfg. Process
Design
•
•
•
•
Design parts in CAD
Document
Quote
Order
Build
• Machine
• Inspect and assemble
• Test
Repeat design iterations as
necessary
2
Pharma EXPO
2 – 5 November 2014
Chicago, IL
3DP- Additive Process
Build
Design
Design
Build
Use
Use
Traditional
Additive Manufacturing
FDM & Polyjet Technologies
FDM
Polyjet
Printing Head
Support Material
Instant
UV Curing
Model Material
•
Real thermoplastics
•
Photopolymers
•
Accuracy
•
1000+ diverse materials
•
Durability
•
Multi-material product realism
3
Pharma EXPO
2 – 5 November 2014
Chicago, IL
A World of Material Possibilities
FDM Thermoplastics
Polyjet Photopolymers
Durable
– ABS
– Production-grade
– Realistic parts
– Translucent
Rigid
– General purpose translucent
– Polypropylene-like
– High-temperature
– ABS-like
– Transparent
Functional
– Anti-static
– High strength
– Manufacturing tools
Flexible, Rubber-like
– High-elongation
– Wide range of Shore Scale A
values (Hardness)
– High Tear Resistance
Industry-Ready
– High strength
– Sterilizable
– Food & drug
Medical
– Biocompatible for
Hearing Aids
– Biocompatible clear
material
– Dental
High-Performance
– Flame retardant
– Chemical-resistant
– Low-toxicity
– Finished parts
Digital Composite Materials
– Pre-defined Digital
Materials™
Polyjet Digital Materials
Material A:
Shore 20
Digital Material:
Shore 85
Material B:
Rigid material
4
Pharma EXPO
2 – 5 November 2014
Chicago, IL
Digital Materials
Primary Applications for Additive Manufacturing
Technology
Additive Manufacturing
Concept
Models
Functional
Prototypes
Manufacturing
Tools
End-Use
Parts
Established / Traditional
Direct Digital Manufacturing
(Design)
(Manufacturing)
5
Pharma EXPO
2 – 5 November 2014
Chicago, IL
Typical Design Cycle
Design Change
Design Change
Prototype Early & Often to Minimize Cost of
Change
80% of Product cost finalized
10,000
Relative Costs
1,000
$$
100
10
1
$
$
Concept
Engineering
Detail
Tooling
Production
Source: Rosenberg, Boston University
6
Pharma EXPO
2 – 5 November 2014
Chicago, IL
Orchid Design Reduces Timeto-Revenue by 20%
Needed time‐to‐market reduction
– High precision design work
– FDA approval
– Months for new orthopedic device
Objet 30 Pro Desktop Printer in house
– “Prototypes for every project”
– Improved quality and manufacturability
Reduced overall product development time
– “Reduced from weeks to hours”
Helps drive more revenue
– Repeat business from happy clients
– Strong competitive advantage
Process
Development
Time
Traditional
product
development
Weeks
3D printing
product
development
Hours
Objet system
in-house
20% reduction
in time
Tooling Applications
• Silicone Molding
• Vacuum Forming
• Injection Molding
• Sand Casting
• Blow Molding
• Fiber Lay-Up
• Soluble Core Molding
• Paper Pulp Molding
• Sheet Metal Forming
7
Pharma EXPO
2 – 5 November 2014
Chicago, IL
Injection Molds
Part description
Test part
Material injected
PP
Special features
Living hinge, bosses, press fit
comments
•
100 parts out of 2 tools
•
Low pressure developed
•
Tools did not fail
Material
PP
Nozzle Temp [F]
428
Inj. Pressure [psi]
8700
Hold Pressure [psi]
4351
Holding time [s]
8
cycle time [s]
180
Comments
Cooling with air pressure
Injection Molds
Cost (US$)
Turnaround (days)
comments
P20 Steel
3400
18
estimate
Aluminum
1670
7
estimate
ABS‐like
960
22 Hr. (1 day)
Connex 500
Consumption: 810gr RGD535
1408gr RGD515
150gr support
Time saving: 700‐1800%
Cost savings: • 43% over aluminum
• 72% over steel
8
Pharma EXPO
2 – 5 November 2014
Chicago, IL
Thermoforming: FDM & Polyjet Roles
•
Primary: Thermoforming molds
•
Secondary: Coordinated tool sets
– Plug assists, web killers
– Matched dies
– Trim guides
•
Advantages
– Automated, direct from CAD
• 1 to 2 day production
• Less labor required
– No vent drilling
– Less expensive
Thermoformed parts on FDM mold
PJ soap box tool
FDM packaging prototype Xerox Uses FDM for Quick Turn
Tooling
Up to 3 revisions on new products
– Machined wood molds
– Mold design adjustments
Experimented with porosity
– No vacuum holes required
– Found a consistently successful solution
Added value to system
– Originally purchased to produce fixtures and
assembly tooling
Advantages
– Quicker iterations
– Reduction in cost per iteration = better product
“So far we have not found anything we cannot do with FDM.” ‐Duane Byerley ‐ Xerox
Prototype cover mold
Method
CNC machining
FDM
Savings
Time
Cost
$1,200
7 days
$100
0.5 days
$1,100
6.5 days
9
Pharma EXPO
2 – 5 November 2014
Chicago, IL
Manufacturing Applications
• Jigs & Fixtures
• Assembly / Manufacturing Tools
• Testing / Inspection
• Transportation
• Production Line Testing
• Equipment Calibration
• Molding Validation
• End-Use Parts (Rapid Manufacturing)
• Surrogate Parts
• Inserts
Manufacturing Tools Classification
Transportation
Part carriers
End of arm tools
Assembly line
Pallets
Tool holders
Assembly / Manufacturing
Jigs
Fixtures
Drill guides
Workbook holders
Manufacturing line pallets
Custom equipment guards
Tool holders / organizers (5S)
Inspection
CMM part fixtures
Check gauges
Go / No-Go gauges
Part holders / carriers
Test fixtures
10
Pharma EXPO
2 – 5 November 2014
Chicago, IL
End of Arm Tools
•
Tools used on automated machinery
•
Commonly found in:
– Packaging equipment
FDM robotic gripper
– Manufacturing/assembly equipment
– Testing and quality inspection equipment
•
Printed components for customized machinery
•
Replacement or “improvement” parts
•
Cost and down-time reduction
•
Greater design freedom
FDM interchangeable conveyer gates
– Consolidated assemblies
– Complex geometries
FDM vacuum gripper
Production Line Testing
• Example: A manufacturing plant producing medical pills
• Verify that the production line is well calibrated & tuned
• When the product is launched, the production line is all set
• Systems need to be tuned & calibrated:
• Counting unit measurements
• Sorting and packaging units
• Single file line systems
• You can use PolyJet printed models
• Highly accurate parts & uniform weight density
11
Pharma EXPO
2 – 5 November 2014
Chicago, IL
ScriptPro Adopts 3D Printing
for End Use Parts
Needed customized equipment for customers
– Pills and vials come in many sizes
– Product customized for each pharmacy
Utilized Fortus for prototyping
– Immediately began using for DDM
– Little to no post production work
Significant overall savings
– Elimination of machining and tooling
– Saved estimated $24,900 changes (single project)
Traditional approach
– Re‐tooling costs on change
Additive approach
– Saved on design time (no tooling)
– Easily adapts to new vials
– No outside vendor
Process
Cost
Tooling costs
$30,000
DDM production
$5,100
Savings
$24,900
(79%)
Intersection of 3D Printing and Pharma:
1: Design
3D printing allows rapid iteration and initial testing of designs for inhalers, nasal delivery systems, and packaging solutions
Complex Requirements
Varied Design
Working Models
Iteration
to desired
dose profile
12
Pharma EXPO
2 – 5 November 2014
Chicago, IL
Intersection of 3D Printing and Pharma:
2: Validation and Verification
3D printing and additive manufacturing can bring real patient simulacra to the design and verification stages of drug delivery systems:
A Traditional Method:
Use of healthy volunteers with radiolabeled particles to verify penetration of inhaled pharmaceuticals
3D Printing with PolyJet:
Convert human MRI or CT Scans into 3D printed geometry to test realistic and varied anatomies for delivery
Figure 1. Hollow realistic central airway geometry of
a patient produced by CT scans, 3D reconstruction
software and 3D prototyping technique
Intersection of 3D Printing and Pharma:
3: Additive Manufacturing
Additive manufacturing allows increased part complexity, can reduce number of parts to be assembled, and can streamline production processes
Complex Nozzle Design
Additive Manufacturing
In additive manufacturing, “complexity is free” allowing novel multi‐chambered designs of nozzles
Ideal for low to medium scale production, enables designs that cannot be made by traditional molding
13
Pharma EXPO
2 – 5 November 2014
Chicago, IL
Thanks!
Contact me at [email protected] for further information
14