MS Building Plan 14-15 - St. James R

Middle School CSIP
2014 - 2015
Building
Need/Concern
Data the Need
is Based Upon
1. Training for
* Professional
teachers and
development
students on
needs assesstechnology,
ment
technology tools,
* Technology
and combining
Integration
student engagement
Reflection
with technology
(Kagan, project
based learning, 6-12
assessment tool,
etc.).
Building SMART
Goal to Address
Need
Teachers will have the
opportunity to
participate in summer,
after school, and PLC
training on Technology
(MAC, Canvas, Apps,
lessons, websites,
content area
resources,student
engagement coupled
with technology)
Students will
participate in
classroom lessons
and school wide
trainings on how to
use MAC/Canvas as
well as digital
citizenship developed
collaboratively by
classroom teachers
and Media Specialist
Activities Planned to
Improve the Need
Teacher
* 2 day Canvas
training in
Summer (ongoing)
* MAC introduction
May 16 at deployment and May
19 and 20 after
school (ongoing)
* Project based
learning during
PLCs and ideally
during PD
*Training on 6-12
assessment tool
Student - Technology
training
* First few days
of school in Math
Labs/ Careers and
individual
classrooms
* Wednesday
mornings during
PLCs
District
CSIP Goal
Goal 1
Strategy 10
Goal 3
Strategy 6
Goal 4
Strategy 11
and 12
Evaluation Instruments
Teacher
Completion of trainings
Student
Completion of school wide
training modules specific to
Canvas, MAC, and digital
citizenship
How does technology affect
achievement in
state assessments, STAR
Reading & Math, Running
Records,Study Island, IXL,
Writing Assessments,
benchmarks, Common
Assessments,
NEE data, Surveys
Middle School CSIP
2014 - 2015
2. Move towards
and maintain being
an exemplary school
in PLCs/data teams
*MO PLC
Implementation
Rubric
*Action Plans
*Teachers will utilize
PLC/data team
meetings to analyze
student data as it
pertains to specific
MLS/GLEs and create
individual education
plans (differentiation)
based on such data.
*Evaluate Vision
Statement/commitment statements to
support vision.
*Evolve towards
students becoming
assessment capable
learners by creating
their own goals and
monitoring progress
towards that goal with
teacher guidance.
*Improve three tier
model especially level
two and three
interventions.
(Focus on enrichment
as well as
remediation.)
*Celebrations of staff.
*Teachers will utilize
PLC/data team meetings
to analyze student data as
it pertains to specific
MLS/GLEs and create
individual education plans
(differentiation) based on
such data.
*Collaborate as faculty to
evaluate MS visions
statement and
personalized
commitments
*Educate teachers during
PLCs on how to assist
students in setting goals,
monitoring progress
towards goal, and
analyzing personal data.
*During grade level and
PLC meetings continue to
improve three tier
interventions at level 2
and 3 based on student
need.
*Iteach/technology
workshops for new and
veteran teachers
* Staff Bulletin Board in
new conference room
*Gather ideas from staff
or other districts on how
to celebrate each other
Goal 1
Strategy 4,
5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
10
Goal 2
Strategy 5
Goal 3
Strategy 6
Goal 4
Strategy 11
and 12
State assessments, STAR
Reading & Math, Running
Records,Study Island, IXL,
Writing Assessments,
benchmarks, Common
Assessments,
NEE data, Surveys
Smart Goal Growth
MO PLC implementation rubric
Completion of action plans
Progressive Vision Statement
for MS
Personal commitment
statements
Portfolios
Middle School CSIP
2014 - 2015
3. Increase
subgroup
achievement in
math on state
assessment
*State
Assessment
(MAP 2014 as
well as previous
years’) scores
*MSIP 5 APR
report
*Principal’s
professional
improvement
plan goal
*The Middle School
will implement more
time for math at each
grade level adding a
math lab in the master
schedule
*Improve math
instruction by
engaging students
utilizing best practices
both with and without
technology.
*Training for teachers
using Accelerated Math
*Use of Accelerated Math
in labs
*Continue training on
instructional best
practices during PLCs
*Exploration of additional
resources to enhance
new curriculum
Goal 1
Strategy 5,
6, 7, 8, 9, 10
Goal 3
Strategy 6
Goal 4
Strategy 11
and 12
Math Data from State
Assessment
4. Teachers need
additional support
on the
implementation of
the NEE evaluation
model and use the
data generated to
make sound
instructional
decisions.
State mandated
To improve teachers
as instructional
leaders in their
classrooms in regards
to 1.2 Student
Engagement and 7. 4
Student Data Analysis
*Training/implementation
of strategies at monthly
faculty meetings
*Training/implementation
of strategies during biweekly PLC/data team
meetings
Iteach/technology
workshops for new and
veteran teacher
*NEE Training May 16,
2014
Goal 1
Strategy 5,
6, 7, 8, 9, 10
Goal 2
Strategy 1, 2
and 6
Data generated from NEE
teacher evaluation model.
5. Students need to
State
Teachers will obtain a
*Through PLC/data teams
Goal 1
Artifacts from lessons and
State assessments, STAR
Reading & Math, Running
Records,Study Island, IXL,
Writing Assessments,
benchmarks, Common
Assessments,
NEE data, Surveys, data
binders, student data
binders/portfolios
Middle School CSIP
2014 - 2015
increase rigor and
stamina for
differentiated
instruction to satisfy
the demands of
MLS/Literacy
Standards/GLEs
assessments,
STAR Reading &
Math, Running
Records,Study
Island, IXL,
Writing
Assessments,
benchmarks,
Common
Assessments,
NEE data,
Surveys, data
binders, student
data binders/
portfolios
better understanding
of DOK level which will
support them in
creation of high rigor
lessons and
assessments.
(teacher collaboration),
teachers will align lessons
and assessments to
increased levels of DOK.
*Teachers will align to
literacy standards using
RACE on constructed
responses.
Strategy 10
assessments.
Student Data Binder
Teacher Data Binder

Download Report