Comparing Conventional and Innovative Vapor Intrusion Assessment

Abstract Submission
29-31 October 2014 – Jupiters Casino, Gold Coast, Australia
Comparing Conventional and Innovative Vapor Intrusion Assessment
Methods to Reduce Costs and Improve Data Quality and Spatial
Resolution
Matt Vanderkooy1, Todd McAlary1, William Wertz1, Paul Nicholson1, Hester Groenevelt1
1
Geosyntec Consultants, 130 Research Lane Suite 2, Guelph, N1G 5G3, Canada
[email protected]
Session Theme relevant to: Site Characterization: Advances in Vapour Sampling
Keywords: Sediment, Mercury, Methyl Mercury, PCBs, Remediation,
Amendments, Sequestration
Background. Current guidance documents typically recommend collecting sub-slab samples to
characterize the concentrations of VOCs below a building, which is expensive and time
consuming for large buildings. Multi-Incremental Sampling™ (MIS) and high volume sampling
(HVS) methods are two alternative approaches for assessment. The MIS approach was based
on collecting composite samples from a grid of temporary sub-slab sampling points. The HVS
testing consists of extracting, monitoring and sampling soil gas at a high flow rate (hundreds or
thousands of liters per minute) for 30 to 60 minutes.
Approach. A demonstrations/validation study was performed for the Air Force to compare these
methods with conventional Summa canister samples and analysis by EPA Method TO-15 at two
slab on grade buildings at Vandenberg Air Force Base. The first building was large (50,700 ft2)
with measured sub-slab TCE concentrations ranging from non-detect to 14,000 ppbv. The
second building was a medium- sized (11,200 ft2) former dry cleaner facility with sub-slab PCE
concentrations ranging from non-detect to 180,000 ppbv. Results of the MIS and HVS methods
will be compared to the conventional Summa/TO-15 method in terms of the information gained,
ease of use, and cost.
Speaker Biography
Matt Vanderkooy (Geosyntec Consultants)
Matt is a remediation scientist working for Geosyntec based in Guelph, Ontario, Canada, and is
a member of SuRF Canada and SuRF (US). He evaluates and improves the sustainability
outcomes of remediation projects using footprint and life cycle assessment tools, and providing
technical analysis and support for projects cleaning up contaminated sediments, soil and
groundwater.
Matt’s work illustrates the application of innovative methods and technologies to proven
approaches for cleaning up sites while achieving combined technical, financial, and
sustainability goals. His remediation and site investigation experience spans the four major
environmental media: soil, groundwater, sediment and soil-vapour. He has planned and
implemented site investigations and designed and managed remedies which include application
2014 EcoForum c/- Australasian Land & Groundwater Association (ALGA)
40 Hoddle St, Robertson NSW 2577
Ph 1300 789 719 m 0409 531 305
Abstract Submission
29-31 October 2014 – Jupiters Casino, Gold Coast, Australia
of specialist techniques such as sediment pore water passive sampling, sediment treatability
studies and chlorinated solvent bioremediation.
Matt’s presentation will include demonstration of the skills and responsibilities in adapting
sustainable remediation approaches to analysing and finding solutions to complex problems.
Please Tick If Appropriate: þ I am a young professional with less than 5 years industry experience, less
than 35 years old and wish to have my abstract considered for a young
professional award*. 2014 EcoForum c/- Australasian Land & Groundwater Association (ALGA)
40 Hoddle St, Robertson NSW 2577
Ph 1300 789 719 m 0409 531 305