Program Specification

TQF 5 – MNS (International Program)/15 July 2014
COURSE REPORT
KHON KAEN UNIVERSITY
Faculty/ College/Campus
Faculty of Nursing
Department/ Division/ Subject group
Section 1: General Information
1.1 Course code and Course title
Thai
xxx xxx
English
xxx xxx
1.2 Number of credits
x(x-x-x)
1.3 Program and Type of subjects
Specify: 1. Required courses (Core course, Specific course) 2. Elective courses
Type of Subject:
Offered in: Master of Nursing Science Program (International Program)
1.4 Responsible faculty member(s) for the course
Course Director:
Teaching staff:
1.
2.
3.
1.5 Semester/Year of study
Semester
Year of Study
1.6 Pre-requisite
None
1.7 Co-requisite
None
1.8 Venue of study
Faculty of Nursing Khon Kaen University, Building
1
Room
TQF 5 – MNS (International Program)/15 July 2014
Section 2:
Actual Course Implementation compared with Teaching Plan (stated in TQF3)
1. Number of actual teaching hours compared with teaching hours specified in teaching plan
Topics
Number of teaching hours
in the plan
Number of Actual
teaching hours
Reasons (when the
number of hours
discrepancy is more
than 25%)
2. Topics that were unable to teach as stated in the teaching plan
Topics that were not able to
teach as planned
Significance of the topics to the
overall course effectiveness
Plans for compensation
3. Effectiveness of the teaching methods specified in the Course Specification
Learning outcomes
Teaching methods
specified in Course
Specification
Effectiveness Problems of the
Yes
No teaching methods
1. Moral and Ethics
2. Knowledge
3. Cognitive skills
4. Interpersonal Skills
and Responsibilities
5. Numerical Analysis,
Communication and
Information
Technology Skills
6. Psychomotor Skills
(if any)
2
Suggestions for
Improvement
TQF 5 – MNS (International Program)/15 July 2014
4. Suggestions for Improvement of Teaching Methods
Section 3: Course Outcomes
1. Number of registered students
2. Number of registered student at the end of semester
3. Number of students who withdrew (W)
4. Grade distribution
Grade
Number of students
Percentage
A
B+
B
C+
C
D+
D
F
Incomplete (I)
Satisfied (S)
Unsatisfied (U)
Withdrawal (W)
5. Factors that caused unusual grade distribution (if any)
6. Discrepancies in the evaluation plan specified in the course specification
6.1 Discrepancies in evaluation time frame
6.2 Discrepancies in evaluation methods (if any)
3
TQF 5 – MNS (International Program)/15 July 2014
7. Verification of Students’ Achievements
Verification methods
Results
1.
2.
Section 4: Problems and Impacts on Implementation
1. Teaching and learning resources and facilities
Problems in using teaching resources
Impacts on students learning outcomes
1.
2.
2. Administration and Organization
Problems from
Administration/Organization (if any)
Impacts on students learning outcomes
1.
2.
Section 5: Course Evaluation
1. Course Evaluation by the Student
(as suggested in KKU Guideline for Course Evaluation)
1.1 Important comments from course evaluation by the students (identify both positive and
negative comments )
1.2 Teachers’ comments in respond to important comments by the students (stated in 1.1)
4
TQF 5 – MNS (International Program)/15 July 2014
2. Course Evaluation by other evaluation methods
2.1 Important comments from course evaluation by other evaluation methods
2.2 Teachers’ comments in respond to important comments by other evaluation methods
(stated in 2.1)
Section 6: Improvement Plan
1. Progress of teaching and learning improvement recommendations as stated in the
previous course report
1.1 Improvement plan proposed in previous semester/academic year that were able to
complete
Improvement plan
Results
1.
2.
1.2 Improvement plans proposed in previous semester/academic year that were not able
to complete
Improvement plan
Results
1.
2.
2. Other improvement
(Explain other improvement e.g. change in teaching methods, teaching resources and facilities)
Other improvements
Results
1.
2.
5
TQF 5 – MNS (International Program)/15 July 2014
3. Suggestions for future improvement/the next academic year
Suggestions
Time Frame
Responsible person
1.
2.
4. Suggestions from course director and teaching staff
Topics
Suggestion details
1. Teaching/learning strategies
2. Evaluation methods
3. Resource and facilities
4. Organization administration
5. Course evaluation
6. Improvement
7. Others (specify_______________________)
Course director
Program director
Signature
Signature
Date
Date
6

Download Report