National Health Council 1730 M Street NW, Suite 500, Washington, DC 20036-4561 ■ 202-785-3910 ■ www.nationalhealthcouncil.org ■ [email protected] BOARD OF DIRECTORS Chairperson Nancy Brown American Heart Association Chairperson-Elect Randy Beranek National Psoriasis Foundation Vice Chairperson Tracy Hart Osteogenesis Imperfecta Foundation Secretary Thomas Wallace Eli Lilly and Company Treasurer Donald Schumacher, PsyD National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization Immediate Past Chairperson LaVarne A. Burton American Kidney Fund Margaret Anderson FasterCures – The Center for Accelerating Medical Solutions John Castellani PhRMA Barbara Collura RESOLVE: The National Infertility Association Elizabeth J. Fowler, PhD, JD Johnson & Johnson Robert Gebbia American Foundation for Suicide Prevention James C. Greenwood Biotechnology Industry Organization Larry Hausner American Diabetes Association Jennifer L. Howse, PhD March of Dimes Foundation Dan Leonard National Pharmaceutical Council Carolyn Levering The Marfan Foundation Paul Pomerantz, FASAE, CAE American Society of Anesthesiologists Eric Racine, PharmD Sanofi Amy Comstock Rick, JD Parkinson’s Action Network John W. Walsh Alpha-1 Foundation Cynthia Zagieboylo National Multiple Sclerosis Society Ex Officio Member Myrl Weinberg, FASAE, CAE Chief Executive Officer National Health Council June 24, 2014 Ms. Marilyn Tavenner Administrator Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Department of Health and Human Services 200 Independence Ave, SW Washington, DC 20201 Re: Lack of Patient Protections for Exceptions Coverage in the Exchange and Insurance Market Standards for 2015 and Beyond final rule Dear Administrator Tavenner: The National Health Council (NHC) appreciates the opportunity to submit comments on the recently released the Exchange and Insurance Market Standards for 2015 and Beyond final rule. We are submitting this letter to ensure that patient protections are strengthened in the upcoming plan year. The NHC is the only organization that brings together all segments of the health community to provide a united voice for the more than 133 million people with chronic diseases and disabilities as well as their family caregivers. Made up of more than 100 national health-related organizations and businesses, its core membership includes the nation’s leading patient advocacy groups, which control its governance. Other members include professional societies and membership associations, nonprofit organizations with an interest in health, and major pharmaceutical, medical device, biotechnology, and insurance companies. On May 16, 2014, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), released the Exchange and Insurance Market Standards for 2015 and Beyond final rule. Among other provisions, the rule states that health insurance issuers that provide essential health benefits must have a process to allow an enrollee to request and gain access to clinically appropriate drugs not covered by the health plan. In the final rule, HHS requires that this process be expedited when necessary by requiring issuers to respond to requests within 24 hours under exigent circumstances. While the NHC applauds HHS for including an exigent circumstance for the exceptions process, it is vital for HHS to also ensure that there are sufficient patient protections including an assurance of reasonable and specified cost-sharing that counts towards the plan’s maximum out-ofpocket (MOOP) limit. Lack of Patient Protections for Exceptions Coverage June 24, 2014 Page 2 of 3 As noted in the final rule’s preamble, this regulation does not address cost-sharing requirements for prescription drugs covered through the exceptions process or a requirement that cost-sharing for these medications count towards the MOOP. This glaring lack of patient protections regarding the affordability of drug exceptions may leave patients, especially lower income patients, without an option to access life-saving therapies. It is critical that patients have timely and affordable access to prescription drugs not covered on the formulary, and if patients are not granted reasonable cost-sharing for prescriptions accessed through the exceptions process, these prescription drugs may remain unavailable due to the high costs imposed by health plans. HHS has already designed and implemented an appropriate model for these exact scenarios under Medicare Part D. In the exceptions process in Medicare Part D, enrollees are granted specific cost-sharing guidelines for therapies covered under the exceptions. As stated in the Medicare Prescription Drug Benefit Manual Chapter 18, Section 30.2.2.4: “a plan sponsor has the flexibility to determine what level of cost-sharing will apply for non-formulary drugs approved under the exceptions process. However, a plan sponsor is limited to choosing a single cost-sharing level that applies to one of its existing formulary tiers. For example, a plan sponsor may apply the non-preferred level of cost-sharing for all non-formulary drugs approved under the exception process. Part D sponsors may also elect to apply a second, less expensive level of cost-sharing for approved formulary exceptions for generic drugs, so long as the second level of cost-sharing is associated with an existing formulary tier and is uniformly applied to all approved formulary exceptions for generic drugs.” i This level of cost-sharing specificity applied to nonformulary drugs approved under the exceptions protections ensures that patients maintain timely and affordable access to prescriptions drugs. Additionally, as stated in the Medicare Prescription Drug Benefit Manual, costs that are incurred can be added to an enrollee’s True Out-of-Pocket (TrOOP). More specifically the Medicare Prescription Drug Benefit Manual, Chapter 5, Section 30.1 notes: “Costs are considered incurred costs and can be added to an enrollee’s TrOOP balance if the following conditions are met: • • Costs are incurred against any annual deductible, any applicable cost-sharing for costs above the deductible and up to the initial coverage limit, and any applicable cost-sharing for costs above the initial coverage limit and up to the annual out-of-pocket threshold. Costs are incurred with respect to covered Part D drugs that are either included in a PDP or MA-PD plan’s formulary or treated as being included in a plan’s formulary as a result of a coverage determination, redetermination, or appeal under chapter 18.” ii This same protection should also be applied to MOOP limits for enrollees in exchanges and will allow patients living with chronic conditions to access life-saving therapies with reasonable patient cost-sharing expectations that count towards the MOOP. The NHC strongly suggests that HHS release additional guidance clarifying cost-sharing for prescription drugs covered through the exceptions process and including language to ensure that any spending on prescription drugs accessed through the exceptions process would be included in MOOP. We ask that HHS issue a rule or sub-regulatory guidance requiring plans to make these changes, clarifying the policy to match the stated patient protections currently available in Medicare Part D. Lack of Patient Protections for Exceptions Coverage June 24, 2014 Page 3 of 3 We appreciate the efforts the HHS has made to improve patient protections for those who are served through the exchange market. However, we believe that it is important to increase protections for vulnerable patient populations, particularly those living with chronic diseases and conditions trying to access non-formulary drugs in a timely and affordable manner. As the voice for people with chronic conditions, the NHC believes that broad patient protections are critical to the success of qualified health plans and exchanges. As HHS works to clarify and issue further guidance on exchanges and insurance market standards moving forward, the NHC strongly encourages the agency to include the above-referenced levels of patient protections supported in our previous communications with the agency. We would like to thank you for this opportunity to share our comments. The NHC supports your efforts to ensure that exchange plans meet the intended objectives of improving and standardizing health care coverage. Please do not hesitate to contact Eric Gascho, our Assistant Vice President of Government Affairs, if you or your staff would like to discuss these issues in greater detail. He is reachable by phone at 202-973-0545 or via e-mail at [email protected]. You may also reach me on my direct, private line at 202-973-0546 or via e-mail at [email protected]. Sincerely, Myrl Weinberg, FASAE, CAE Chief Executive Officer i ii Medicare Prescription Drug Benefit Manual, Section 30.2.2.4, Chapter 18 Medicare Prescription Drug Benefit Manual, Section 30.1, Chapter 5
© Copyright 2024 ExpyDoc