Association of specialty drug prescription abandonment with increasing member out-of-pocket expense Catherine I. Starner, PharmD, CGP, BCPS1,2, Kevin Bowen, MD, MBA1, Yang Qiu, MS1, Patrick P. Gleason, PharmD, FCCP, BCPS1,2 1Prime Therapeutics LLC, Eagan, MN, USA; 2University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA Objective Identify members attempting to newly initiate or re-initiate MS or BAI specialty drug therapy and assess if the association between abandonment and OOP expense has changed. •• Separate analyses for MS and BAI therapy were performed to assess the association between member OOP expense and abandonment rate. •• For the BAI analysis, we also identified members who had a final paid methotrexate claim during the 180 days prior to their initial BAI claim. 4085-C © Prime Therapeutics LLC 03/14 1305 Corporate Center Drive, Eagan, MN 55121 Patrick Gleason, 800.858.0723, ext. 5190 AMCP, April 3, 2014, Tampa, FL, USA •• Members with an adjudicated MS or BAI claim were then classified as either initiating therapy, defined as a paid claim, or as abandoning therapy (i.e., not initiating therapy). •• The association of MS or BAI abandonment rate and OOP expense was tested with logistic regression models using $0 – $50 OOP as the reference group and adjusting for age, gender, income using ZIP codelevel census data, education using ZIP code-level census data, race using ZIP code-level census data, and methotrexate use for the BAI analysis. •• For all statistical tests, the significance level was set a priori at p <0.05. →→ BAI specialty drug therapy was significantly more likely to be abandoned at an OOP ≥$250 compared to <$50 (Figure 2). •• An OOP of $2,000 or more was associated with over half of members abandoning their initial prescription for MS or BAI therapy. OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.1–2.9 $150 to <$250 146 (4.4%) 15 (10.3%) OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.1–3.2 $250 to <$500 120 (3.6%) 15 (12.5%) OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.3–4.1 $500 to <$750 136 (4.1%) 23 (16.9%) OR 3.2, 95% CI 1.9–5.3 $750 to <$1,000 102 (3.1%) 25 (24.5%) OR 5.2, 95% CI 3.1–8.5 $1,000 to <$2,000 215 (6.5%) 75 (34.9%) OR 8.5, 95% CI 6.0–12.1 ≥$2,000 132 (4.0%) 79 (59.8%) OR 23.8, 95% CI 15.9–36.0 specialty drug OOP expense and new prescription therapy abandonment; hence, a direct cause-and-effect link can not be made. •• Pharmacy claims data are intended for administrative and payment purposes and as such they may not represent informed member decisions on the basis of cost alone at the time the claim was reversed. The analysis assumes that the member is presented their OOP expense at the time of intended purchase and the reversed claim without a subsequent paid claim indicates the member abandoned specialty drug therapy. •• Member OOP expense is not adjusted for pharmaceutical manufacturer coupons or patient assistance programs. Therefore, actual member OOP expense may have been lower resulting in misclassification bias. Coupons and patient assistance amounts are not a part of the pharmacy benefit manager adjudication process and therefore unavailable. * members newly initiating MS specialty drug, defined as no MS specialty drug claims in prior 180 days † test for trend, p < 0.001 ‡ model adjusts for age, gender, and ZIP code derived race, income, and education •• Pharmacy data are limited to commercial populations in the Midwest and South, therefore it may not be generalized to Medicare or Medicaid populations or other geographic regions. •• No significant independent Figure 1. Unadjusted Multiple Sclerosis (MS) New Start Abandonment Rate by Out-of-Pocket Member Expense and lack of a methotrexate claim in the previous 180 days were all independently associated with higher BAI abandonment rates. •• Sensitivity analysis requiring abandonment to be no subsequent evidence of a paid BAI claim in the ensuing 180 days did not change the results. •• During July 2010 through December 2012 approximately two out of three members 40% 34.9% 30% 30% 10% 6.1% 6.8% 10.0% 10.3% 17.9% 20% 16.9% 13.9% 12.5% 10% 5.3% 5.4% 7.5% 6.8% 7.2% •• MS specialty drug therapy was 80% more likely to be abandoned among members attempting to newly initiate or re-initiate with an OOP between $100 and $250 compared to an $0 to <$50 OOP, while BAI therapy was 30% to 40% more likely to be abandoned, however, the BAI findings were not statistically significant. 0 (n = (n <$ 0 $5 $1 – – $0 <$ – 50 (n = 25 18 0) 0* (n – <$ = 50 14 $5 6) 0* 00 (n – <$ = $7 12 75 50 0) 0* – (n <$ $1 = 1,0 ,0 13 00 00 6) *( – <$ n 2, = 00 10 2) 0* (n >$ 2, = 00 21 0* 5) (n = 13 2) 66 2) = * p < 0.05 compared to $0–$50 group 5,7 47 ) 00 = – 2 <$ ,39 15 $1 6) 0 50 ( n – = <$ 64 $2 2 50 3) 50 (n – <$ = 50 65 $5 0* 1) 00 (n – = <$ $7 93 75 50 0 7) – *( <$ $1 n 1,0 ,0 = 00 43 00 1) – *( <$ n 2, = 00 60 0* 5) (n >$ 2, = 00 92 0* 4) (n = 31 0) 0% 0% who attempted to newly initiate or re-initiate MS or BAI specialty drug therapy had an OOP expense per 30-day supply claim of <$100 with an abandonment rate of one in 18. No differences in abandonment rates were found between the $0 to <$50 and $50 to <$100 groups. 24.8% 24.5% 20% •• A BAI specialty drug OOP expense •• Increasing age, lower income, 50% 40% Biologic Anti-inflammatory agents Conclusions 52.3% 50% abandonment to be no subsequent evidence of a paid MS claim in the ensuing 180 days did not change the results. of between $100 and $499 was associated with 1.3 to 1.4 greater likelihood of new start abandonment compared to an OOP expense <$50, however, statistical significance was found only in the $250 to < $500 group. As the OOP expense increased over $500, abandonment increased at a non‑linear rate, reaching 19.2 fold greater rate of new start abandonment at an OOP expense of $2,000 or more. 60% <$ 10 •• Sensitivity analysis requiring Figure 2. Unadjusted Biologic Anti-Inflammatory (BAI) New Start Abandonment Rate by Out-of-Pocket Member Expense 59.9% 60% 0* associations were found among the other model covariates: age, gender, or ZIP-code derived race, income, and education. 0 MS specialty drug therapy was significantly more likely to be abandoned at an OOP ≥$100 compared to <$50 (Figure 1). 18 (10.0%) $2 50 →→ 180 (5.5%) <$ 15 rates by OOP expense group findings demonstrate: $100 to <$150 $1 5 •• Unadjusted new start abandonment OR 1.1, 95% CI 0.8–1.6 ) was performed to evaluate the trend in abandonment rates as the OOP expense increased (SAS Institute Inc., version 9.1.3, Cary, NC). Univariate abandonment rates were compared for each of the OOP expense groups to the $0 to $50 reference group using the Pearson chi-square statistic. Figures 1 and 2, the abandonment rate increased as OOP increased with a significant trend test, p <0.001, for both MS and BAI agents. 45 (6.8%) (n •• The Cochran-Armitage Trend Test •• As shown in Tables 1 and 2 and 662 (20.1%) – BAI therapy between 7/1/2010 and 12/31/2012 were defined as having no paid or reversed pharmacy or medical claim for any MS or BAI drug in the previous 180 days. Members were required to be continuously enrolled in the 180 days prior to their initial MS or BAI specialty drug claim and for 180 days thereafter. abandoning therapy in each OOP expense group were calculated. MS members attempting to newly initiate therapy had an OOP of $0 to <$100, with an unadjusted abandonment rate of 5.5% (573 members abandoned). $50 to <$100 00 •• Members newly initiating MS or •• The proportions of members •• 10,365 (65.0%) of 15,937 BAI and expense between $100 and $499 was associated with a significant 1.8 to 2.3 greater likelihood of new start abandonment compared to an expense OOP <$50. As the OOP expense increased over $500, abandonment increased at a non‑linear rate, reaching 23.8 fold greater rate of new start abandonment at an OOP expense of $2,000 or more. Unadjusted Abandonment Members (%)† 97 (6.1%) 1,6 00 if new start specialty drug abandonment rates have changed since 2009. glatiramer acetate, interferon beta‑1a, interferon beta‑1b, natalizumab, and fingolimod. one of the nine following OOP expense groups: $0 – <$50; $50 – <$100; $100 – <$150; $150 – <$250; $250 – <$500; $500 – <$750; $750 – <$1000; $1000 – <$2000; ≥$2000 MS members attempting to newly initiate therapy had an OOP of $0 to <$50, with an unadjusted abandonment rate of 5.4% (399 members abandoned). •• An MS specialty drug OOP n =3,293 Members (%)* 1,600 (48.6%) 00 •• There is minimal information to assess •• MS agents were defined as: •• Members were then placed into •• 7,347 (46.1%) of 15,937 BAI and Out-of-Pocket (OOP) Member Expense $0 to <$50 $1 expense was more than $150, members newly initiating MS or BAI specialty drug therapy were two to 3.7 times more likely to abandon their MS or BAI drug therapy compared to members paying less than $100.4 to evaluate post period claims in ensuing 180 days. 12,644 members newly initiated BAI specialty drug therapy and 1,149 (9.1%) abandoned therapy with 90-days follow-up. Multiple Sclerosis agents = •• A 2009 study found that when OOP •• A sensitivity analysis was performed →→ 3,293 members newly initiated MS specialty drug therapy and 392 (11.9%) abandoned therapy with 90-days follow-up. •• The analysis was intended to explore potential associations between MS and BAI Multivariate Logistic Regression Model‡ Abandonment Odds Ratio (OR) and 95% Confidence Interval (CI) Reference Group <$ 1 products, utilization, and expenditures has resulted in insurers focusing on methods to best manage specialty agents which may include increasing member cost share or out-of-pocket (OOP) expense.3 member share OOP expense was extracted from the initial identified paid claim during the 90-day analysis period or if no paid claim then the initial adjudicated claim that was subsequently reversed. →→ Table 1. Multiple Sclerosis (MS) Specialty Drug Unadjusted and Adjusted Association between Abandonment and Out-of-Pocket Member Expense (n •• The increasing number of specialty abatacept, adalimumab, alefacept, anakinra, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab, tocilizumab, ustekinumab, and rituximab. BAI utilizers were required to have one or more medical claims with an International Classification of Diseases Ninth Revision (ICD-9) code for an approved autoimmune inflammatory disease: rheumatoid arthritis, plaque psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis, ankylosing spondylitis, or juvenile idiopathic arthritis. •• The 30-day specialty drug supply December 2012: Multivariate Logistic Regression Model (Tables 1 and 2) – multiple sclerosis (MS) and biologic anti‑inflammatory (BAI) agents accounted for 46% of pharmacy benefit specialty expenditures in 2012.2 •• BAI agents were defined as: as reversal of the adjudicated claim with no subsequent evidence of additional adjudicated paid claim(s) for MS or BAI in the ensuing 90 days. •• During July 2010 through <$ 50 •• Two classes of specialty drugs, from 11 Blue Cross and Blue Shield Plans with 10.3 million commercially insured lives’ medical and pharmacy data from 1/1/2010 through 6/30/2013. •• Abandoning therapy was defined $5 0 10.9 million member commercial book of business, had a 19.1% trend in 2012 compared to 2011 and accounted for 22.2% of all pharmacy expenditures in 2012.1 •• Observational cross-sectional study Limitations Results – •• Specialty drugs, within Prime Therapeutics’ Methods $0 Background No external funding provided for this research •• For both the MS and BAI groups, an OOP expense of $250 or more was associated with significantly more therapy abandonment than <$50 OOP. As OOP increased beyond $250, abandonment increased at a non-linear rate. * p < 0.05 compared to $0–$50 group •• The $250 OOP is an important value as it equates to less than 10% of the MS or Table 2. Biologic Anti-inflammatory (BAI) Specialty Drug Unadjusted and Adjusted Association between Abandonment and Out-of-Pocket Member Expense BAI medication cost and would be the minimum expected OOP for members with a 10% co-insurance benefit. •• Health insurers should consider these findings when designing pharmacy benefits Out-of-Pocket (OOP) Member Expense $0 to <$50 n = 12,644 Members (%)* 5,747 (45.5%) Unadjusted Abandonment Members (%)† 302 (5.2%) Multivariate Logistic Regression Model‡ Abandonment Odds Ratio (OR) and 95% Confidence Interval (CI) Reference Group $50 to <$100 2,396 (18.9%) 129 (5.4%) OR 1.0, 95% CI 0.8–1.3 $100 to <$150 643 (5.1%) 48 (7.5%) OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.0–2.0 $150 to <$250 651 (5.1%) 44 (6.8%) OR 1.3, 95% CI 0.9–1.8 $250 to <$500 937 (7.4%) 67 (7.2%) OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1–1.8 $500 to <$750 431 (3.4%) 60 (13.9%) OR 3.0, 95% CI 2.2–4.0 $750 to <$1,000 605 (4.8%) 108 (17.8%) OR 3.8, 95% CI 3.0–4.9 1. $1,000 to <$2,000 924 (7.3%) 229 (24.8%) OR 5.9, 95% CI 4.9–7.2 2. Prime Therapeutics. Internal Data. ≥ $2,000 310 (2.5%) 162 (52.3%) OR 19.2, 95% CI 14.9–24.7 * members newly initiating BAI specialty drug, defined as no BAI claims in prior 180 days † test for trend, p < 0.001 ‡ model adjusts for age, gender, methotrexate claim, and ZIP code derived race, income and education with contemplation of a maximum OOP cost per claim for preferred formulary specialty drugs. References Prime Therapeutics 2013. Specialty Today + Tomorrow. https://www.primetherapeutics.com/PDF/specialtydtr2013/index.html 3. Gleason, P.P., G.C. Alexander, C.I. Starner, et al. Health Plan Utilization and Costs of Specialty Drugs within Four Chronic Conditions. Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy 2013;19(7):542–48 4. Gleason, P.P., C.I. Starner, B.W. Gunderson, et al. Association of Prescription Abandonment with Cost Share for High-Cost Specialty Pharmacy Medications. Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy 2009;15(8):648–58.
© Copyright 2024 ExpyDoc