Shanghai FTZ Unveils 2014 Version of “Negative List”

BEIJING
NEW YORK
BRUSSELS
SAN FRANCISCO
CENTURY CITY
SEOUL
HONG KONG
SILICON VALLEY
JAKARTA†
LONDON
LOS ANGELES
NEWPORT BEACH
SINGAPORE
TOKYO
Plaza 66, Tower 1, 37th Floor
1266 Nanjing Road West
Shanghai 200040
TELEPHONE
FACSIMILE
WASHINGTON, D.C.
(86) 21-2307-7000
(86) 21-2307-7300
www.omm.com
Shanghai FTZ Unveils 2014 Version of “Negative List”
On June 30, 2014, the Shanghai Municipal Government promulgated the Special
Administration Measures on Foreign Investment Access to the China (Shanghai) Pilot Free
Trade Zone (2014 Amendment) (中国(上海)自由贸易试验区外商投资准入特别管理措施
(负面清单)(2014 年修订)) (the “2014 Negative List”) to further liberalize foreign
investment in the China (Shanghai) Pilot Free Trade Zone (the “FTZ”).
The 2014 Negative List is a list of industries where foreign investment is restricted or
prohibited from the perspective of China’s national security and other national sensitivities.
The first “negative list” was published in September 2013 in conjunction with the official
launch of the FTZ.
Foreign investors proposing to invest in industrial sectors identified on
the negative list are subject to close scrutiny, and prior government approval would be
required before any investment may take place.
Compared to the 2013 version, the 2014 Negative List has reduced the number of industries
on the list from 190 to 139 (of which 29 industries are per se off-limits for foreign investors
while 110 are categorized as restricted for foreign investors).
Most removals from the list
are, not surprisingly, related to the manufacturing and service sectors.
Some sectors (such as,
the education sector, which attracts a lot of attention from foreign investors) have not seen
OMM_ASIA:3203557.1
Licensed foreign
lawyers only
† In association with Tumbuan & Partners
substantive removals.
A few other sectors of interest to foreign investors, such as real estate, medical services, and
financial services, appear to be seeing some incremental changes, but significant questions
are awaiting answers or clarifications. For example:

Real Estate: foreign investment in the real estate agency sector has been removed
from the list.
In addition, 100% foreign ownership is now allowed for
foreign-invested project companies engaged in master development of land;
unfortunately it is not clear whether such project companies in the FTZ may develop
projects outside the FTZ.

Medical Services: foreign investment in medical institutions are no longer subject to
prior explicit restrictions on minimum investment amount (of RMB20 million) and on
the maximum operation period (of 20 years),.
The prior prohibition on medical
institutions from having operating branches remains in force. Since the reference to
foreign investment in medical institutions remains on the negative list, however, it is
not clear whether such investment (even without any operating branch) would still be
subject to approval by the FTZ Administrative Committee (as opposed to just a
filing) .

Financial Services: prior restrictions on foreign investment in banks, financing
companies, trust companies, currency brokers, small loan companies, and financing
guarantee companies have now been replaced by a statement that “investment in
financial institutions engaged in banking businesses must comply with existing
regulations”; it is, however, not clear whether or not the new reference to “financial
institutions engaged in banking businesses” would cover financing companies, trust
companies, small loan companies, and/or financing guarantee companies which may
also engage in businesses similar to businesses undertaken by banks, e.g., lending.
2

Entertainment: restrictions on foreign investment in Internet cafes have been
eliminated, but it is not clear whether such foreign-invested Internet cafes may have
operating outlets outside the FTZ.
Notably, the 2014 Negative List clarified certain restrictions which were not apparent in the
2013 version.
For example, the 2013 version only provided that “direct sales” were
restricted, but did not specify the detailed restrictions. The 2014 Negative List clarified
such restrictions by imposing specific requirements for minimum capital and the track record
of the potential foreign investor.
With respect to an industrial sector that is not on the list, foreign investors are presumed to
enjoy national treatment in terms of market entry in the FTZ; technically, however, it does not
automatically mean that such businesses would now be allowed in the FTZ. For example,
while restrictions on certain industries, e.g., gambling and pornographic industries, have been
removed from the 2014 Negative List, such businesses are still prohibited in the FTZ - they
were removed only because the prohibitions on such businesses apply to both Chinese and
foreign investors equally under the principle of national treatment for foreign investors.
Therefore, a foreign investor should not presume that a particular business is allowed in the
FTZ simply because it is not on the 2014 Negative List; such foreign investor would be well
advised to seek additional professional advice on whether a proposed business activity is
restricted under any PRC laws and regulations applicable to both foreign and Chinese
investors.
3