Presentation (1MB) - (SAME) Honolulu Post

7/21/2014
PURPOSE
UFC 4-010-01
DOD MINIMUM ANTITERRORISM
STANDARDS FOR BUILDINGS
 Brief history & summary of UFC 4-010-01
 Clarify standoff distances confusions
 Introduce design aids to assist design professionals to
Aids for Design Professionals
determine appropriate Standoff Distances
9 July 2014
 We only address building types that we usually encounter with DoD
projects
 This presentation is not intended to be comprehensive
Presented by: Bennett Fung, P.E.
 Please read UFC 4-010-01 for details
2
HISTORY OF UFC 4-010-01
AT/FP APPLICABILITY
UFC 4-010-01 DoD Minimum Antiterrorism Standards for Buildings
Summary
UFC 4-010-02 DoD Minimum Antiterrorism Standoff Distances for Buildings
(FOUO)
Occupancy Level
First published:
 31 July 2002
 8 October 2003
 22 January 2007, Change 1
Major Revision:
 9 February 2012
 1 October 2013, Change 1
Number of DoD
Population Density
Personnel that routinely Greater than one person
occupy the space
per 430 sf
Level of Protection
Need to
Conform to Minimum
AT/FP Standards
Yes
Primary Gathering
50 or more, and
YES
Low
Inhabited
11 or more, and
YES
Very Low
Yes
Low Occupancy
Fewer than 11, or
NO
None
Exempt
High Occupancy
Family Housing
13 units or more
NA
Low
Yes
Low Occupancy
Family Housing
12 units or fewer
NA
None
Exempt
3
4
5
6
LEVELS OF PROTECTION
 Window and Door Behaviors
Level of
Protection
Window Hazard
Rating ASTM
F2912
Below AT
Standards
Window Description
Glazing Injuries
Door Hazard Rating
ASTM F2247 and ASTM F2927
High
Windows will fail
catastrophically
Lethal hazards
Category V
Doors will be thrown into rooms
Very Low
Low
Glazing will fracture,
come out of the frame,
and is likely to be
propelled into the
building
Potential to cause
serious injuries
Category IV
Doors will become dislodged from
the structure but will not create a
flying debris hazard
Low
Very Low
Medium
Minimal Hazard
& No Hazard
Category III
Glazing will fracture,
Doors will experience nonDoes not present a
potentially come out of
catastrophic failure, but will have
the frame, but at reduced significant injury hazard
permanent deformation and may be
velocity
inoperable
Minimal hazard
Glazing will fracture, but
consisting of glass dust
remain in the frame
and slivers
Category II
Door will be openable but will have
permanent deformation
1
7/21/2014
7
FIRST EDITION:
8
CURRENT EDITION:
9
STANDOFF DISTANCES
STANDOFF DISTANCES
 For some wall
types…will require
window and door
construction that is
significantly heavier and
more expensive than
windows and doors
designed at the standoff
distances in previous
versions.
 Tradeoffs will have to be
analyzed when:
10
 There is an App for that!
 iTunes Store:
Before
148 ft
(45 m)
82 ft
(25 m)
82 ft
(25 m)
 iStandoff (for iPad)
 iStandoff Lite (for
iPhone)
Sorry, Android App is
coming!
33 ft
(10 m)
 <82 feet (25 m) for WI
 <33 feet (10 m) for WII
11
12
2
7/21/2014
STANDARD 1: STANDOFF DISTANCES
CONVENTIONAL CONSTRUCTION
PARAMETERS
 Figures B-1 and B-2 have many Qualifications
(PAGE 1/2)
 Building structure must meet Conventional Construction Parameters to use
the conventional construction standoff distances provided in these tables
 If the building structure does not meet Conventional Construction
Parameters OR if there is not adequate standoff distance, then the structure
needs specific analysis or hardening for blast effects at the available standoff
distance
 Windows and doors must be designed for the applicable standoff distance
 Windows and doors need to be properly anchored to the supporting
structure
 The structures around the window and door openings need to be designed
for the increased applied loads due to larger tributary areas to the adjacent
supporting elements
13
CONVENTIONAL CONSTRUCTION
PARAMETERS
14
THE PROBLEM
(PAGE 2/2)
How are we supposed to determine what is the
 CCP are fairly well
best Standoff Distance for our building?
defined for exterior
walls unless you have
very tall walls
How can we quickly get the window and door
supplier to give us a quote?
 Roof systems are
very limited. Most
commonly used roof
systems will need to
be designed for blast
pressure.
What glazing size and type will work best for our
project?
15
THE SOLUTION: DESIGN AIDS
16
STANDOFF DISTANCES
 For Window Protection
 For Window Protection we created the following design aids
Appendix A - AT/FP Standoff Distance Charts
 Standoff Distance Charts for Windows
•Primary Gathering Building (Low Level of Protection)
PVB Thickness
Controlled Perimeter
Parking and Roadways
 Dynamic Blast Pressure and Impulse Charts
 Window Out of Plane Reaction Forces
 Design Blast Pressure and Impulses using SBEDS-W (Previously HAZL)
 For Various:
 Window sizes - Glazing areas
 Aspect ratios
 Levels of protection
(Explosive Weight I)
(Explosive Weight II)
Combined
0.015”, 0.03” & 0.06”
0.015”
Figure A
Figure B
Figure 1
Figure 4
0.030”
Figure 2
Figure 5
0.060”
Figure 3
Figure 6
•Inhabited Building (Very Low Level of Protection)
 Explosive weights
PVB Thickness
 Glazing construction
 All analysis assumed ground level windows and doors with explosive
placed straight on
17
Controlled Perimeter
Parking and Roadways
(Explosive Weight I)
(Explosive Weight II)
Combined
0.015”, 0.03” & 0.06”
Figure C
Figure D
0.015”
Figure 7
Figure 10
0.030”
Figure 8
Figure 11
0.060”
Figure 9
Figure 12
18
3
7/21/2014
STANDOFF DISTANCES
Old Standoff Distance = 45m (148 ft)
STANDOFF DISTANCES
PRIMARY GATHERING, LOW LEVEL OF PROTECTION, CONTROLLED PERIMETER
 For Window Protection
 Figure 2
 Explosive Weight I
 Low Level of Protection
 IGU ¼” + 2-1/8” with
0.03” PVB
 Example:
 4’x5’ window
 Area = 20 sq ft
 Aspect Ratio: 1.25
 Find required standoff
Fig 1: 0.015” PVB
distance
Fig 2: 0.03” PVB
Fig 3: 0.06” PVB
19
STANDOFF DISTANCES
20
STANDOFF DISTANCES
 For Window Protection
 For Window Protection
Appendix A - AT/FP Standoff Distance Charts
 Figure A
•Primary Gathering Building (Low Level of Protection)
PVB Thickness
Controlled Perimeter
Parking and Roadways
 Explosive Weight I
 Low Level of Protection
(Explosive Weight I)
(Explosive Weight II)
Combined
0.015”, 0.03” & 0.06”
0.015”
Figure A
Figure B
Figure 1
Figure 4
0.030”
Figure 2
Figure 5
0.060”
Figure 3
Figure 6
•Inhabited Building (Very Low Level of Protection)
PVB Thickness
Controlled Perimeter
Parking and Roadways
(Explosive Weight I)
(Explosive Weight II)
Combined
0.015”, 0.03” & 0.06”
Figure C
Figure D
0.015”
Figure 7
Figure 10
0.030”
Figure 8
Figure 11
0.060”
Figure 9
Figure 12
21
22
WINDOW FRAME ANCHOR
STANDOFF DISTANCES
 For Window Protection
 For Window Protection
 Figure 16
 Figure 8
 Explosive Weight I
 Explosive Weight I
 Low Level of Protection
 Very Low Level of
 IGU ¼” + 2-1/8” with
Protection
0.03” PVB
 IGU ¼” + 2-1/8” with
 Find Maximum out-of-
0.03” PVB
plane Reaction
Old Standoff Distance = 25m (82 ft)
23
24
4
7/21/2014
DOOR BLAST DESIGN
WINDOW & DOOR BLAST DESIGN
(Note: Semi-log scale)
Figures 13: Blast Pressure
Figure 14: Impulse
25
UFC 4-020-01
SECURITY ENGINEERING FACILITIES
PLANNING MANUAL
26
*Special Structures include Religious Facilities,
Recreational Facilities, Commissaries and Exchanges
specified in Table 3-1 of UFC 4-020-01
UFC 4-020-01
 Appendix A: New Construction Cost Tables
 UFC 4-010-01, B-1 Site Planning
 …Planning level costs and requirements for building hardening are
addressed in UFC 4-020-01…
 UFC 4-010-01, B-1.1.1 Conventional Construction Standoff Distance
 Those tradeoffs will generally need to be analyzed when standoff
distances are less than 82 feet (25 meters) for Explosive Weight I
and 33 feet (10 meters ) for Explosive Weight II. There are tools in
UFC 4-020-01 that can assist in evaluating those tradeoffs.
27
MINIMUM CONSTRUCTION TYPE
UFC 4-020-01
FOR VARIOUS BUILDING COMPONENTS TO COMPLY WITH AT/FP REQUIREMENTS
 Appendix D of our report
 Appendix D of our report
Admin Facility, Medical Clinic and Barracks:
Standoff Distance
Walls
(feet)
Thk.
Reinf.
Mat. Out. Pane
32.8
8"
Heavy Conc. ¼” Glass
33.1
8"
Heavy Conc. ¼” Glass
33.5
10"
Heavy
CMU ¼” Glass
34 ‐ 43 12" Moderate CMU ¼” Glass
44 ‐ 54 10" Moderate CMU ¼” Glass
54 ‐ 67 12"
Light
CMU ¼” Glass
67 ‐ 69 12"
Light
CMU ¼” Glass
69 ‐ 71 12"
Light
CMU ¼” Glass
71 ‐ 79
8" Moderate CMU ¼” Glass
80 ‐ 96
8" Moderate CMU ¼” Glass
96 ‐ 113 8" Moderate CMU ¼” Glass
113 ‐ 116 8" Moderate CMU ¼” Glass
117 ‐ 131 8"
Light
CMU ¼” Glass
131 ‐ 133 8"
Light
CMU ¼” Glass
133 ‐ 160 8"
Light
CMU ¼” Glass
161+
8"
Light
CMU ¼” Glass
Appendix D – Minimum Construction Type and Cost Increase for Building
Components to Comply with AT/FP Standards
Source: UFC 4-020-01 DoD Security Engineering Facilities Planning Manual,
Appendix A
I. Minimum Construction Type for Building Components to Comply with AT/FP
Level of
Protection
Low
Very Low
Controlled Perimeter Parking and Roadways
(Explosive Weight I)
(Explosive Weight II)
Table 1
Table 2
Table 3
Table 4
II. Cost Increase for Building Components to Comply with AT/FP
Level of
Protection
Low
Very Low
28
Controlled Perimeter Parking and Roadways
(Explosive Weight I)
(Explosive Weight II)
Table 5
Table 6
Table 7
Table 8
29
Windows
Inner Pane
5 x 1/8" Glass
4 x 5/32" Glass
4 x 5/32" Glass
4 x 5/32" Glass
4 x 5/32" Glass
4 x 5/32" Glass
2 x 3/16" Glass
2 x 5/32" Glass
2 x 5/32" Glass
2 x 5/32" Glass
2 x 1/8" Glass
2 x 1/8" Glass
2 x 1/8" Glass
2 x 1/8" Glass
2 x 1/8" Glass
2 x 1/8" Glass
Construction Type
Doors
Door
Backing Wall
Hollow Metal Backing Wall
Hollow Metal Backing Wall
Hollow Metal Backing Wall
Hollow Metal Backing Wall
Hollow Metal Backing Wall
Hollow Metal Backing Wall
Hollow Metal Backing Wall
Hollow Metal Backing Wall
Hollow Metal Backing Wall
Hollow Metal Backing Wall
Hollow Metal Backing Wall
Hollow Metal Backing Wall
Hollow Metal Backing Wall
Hollow Metal Backing Wall
Hollow Metal Backing Wall
Hollow Metal
‐
Laminate
4 x 0.045" PVB
3 x 0.045" PVB
3 x 0.045" PVB
3 x 0.045" PVB
3 x 0.045" PVB
3 x 0.045" PVB
0.060" PVB
0.060" PVB
0.060" PVB
0.060" PVB
0.030" PVB
0.030" PVB
0.030" PVB
0.030" PVB
0.030" PVB
0.030" PVB
Thk.
4.5"
4.5"
4.5"
4.5"
4.5"
4.5"
4.5"
4.5"
4.5"
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
Mat.
Conc.
Conc.
Conc.
Conc.
Conc.
Conc.
Conc.
Conc.
Conc.
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
Deck
Metal
Metal
Metal
Metal
Metal
Metal
Metal
Metal
Metal
Metal
Metal
Metal
Metal
Metal
Metal
Metal
Roofs
L
30'
30'
30'
30'
30'
30'
30'
30'
30'
30'
30'
30'
30'
30'
30'
30'
W
6'
6'
6'
6'
6'
6'
6'
6'
6'
4'
4'
6'
6'
8'
8'
8'
Sppt. Memb.
20K10
20K10
20K10
20K10
20K10
20K10
20K10
20K10
20K10
18LH02
18LH02
18LH02
18LH02
18LH02
16K9
16K9
30
5
7/21/2014
THANK YOU!
DISCLAIMER
 This presentation and accompanying report were prepared by SSFM
SSFM International, Inc.
International, Inc. to serve as a design aid. It does not replace or override
the contents of UFC 4-010-01 or the advice of a professional engineer
experienced in the field of blast design. SSFM International does not
guarantee or warrant the completeness, accuracy or reliability of the
information in this report. Users of this report are responsible for assessing
the relevance and accuracy of the contents of this report and it shall be
used at your own risk. SSFM International will not be liable for any loss,
damage or expense incurred by any person(s) using or relying on the
information in this report.
501 Sumner Street, Suite 620
Honolulu, HI 96817
Bennett Fung, P.E.
[email protected]
 This presentation and accompanying report may not be copied for
(808) 531-1308
commercial redistribution or dissemination without the explicit permission
of SSFM International.
31
32
6

Download Report