Thermal Barrier with DC 315 over BASF Enertite

1325 North 108th E. Ave.
Tulsa, OK 74116
918.437.8333 ph. | 918.437.8487 fx.
CLIENT:
INTERNATIONAL FIREROOFING TECHNOLOGY
17528 Von Karman Ave
Irvine, CA 92614
Test Report No:
SUBJECT:
PRODUCT
EVALUATED:
TJ1856-R
Date:
April 15, 2014
Flammability Testing to NFPA 286, Standard Methods of Fire Tests for Evaluating
Contribution of Wall and Ceiling Interior Finish to Room Fire Grow th – 2011 Edition.
Client refers to samples received as “BASF Enertite® NM open cell polyurethane
foam insulation coated with 18 wet film thickness (wft) of DC315”. This project
w as entered into our receiving system on 10/14/13 in good condition.
TEST REQUESTED: Flammability Testing to NFPA 286, Standard Methods of Fire Tests for Evaluating
Contribution of Wall and Ceiling Interior Finish to Room Fire Grow th – 2011 Edition
and 2006 IBC Section 803.2.1 / 2009 IBC Section 803.1.2 / NFPA 101, and Life
Safety Code, 2009 Edition, Section 10.2.3.7.2 , and 2009 IRC 316.6. The referenced
procedure w as used to generate this report and data obtained from the test.
SAMPLING DETAIL: Test samples w ere randomly selected and sealed by QAI Laboratories representative
Jeff Judd on October 22, 2013. QAI verified the seals and inspector marks upon
receipt. The foam components arrived at QAI Laboratories on October 31, 2013 and
w ere verified by QAI Laboratories. Construction of the test room, BASF Enertite®NM
open cell polyurethane foam insulation, and subsequent coating of the foam in the
test room w as w itnessed by QAI in accordance w ith Section 3.3 of ICC-ES AC85.
TEST DATE:
December 19, 2013
CONCLUSION:
Currently, there are no acceptance criteria listed in NFPA 286. Based on the test
results herein, the tested assembly as described in this report COMPLIES w ith NFPA
101; Life Safety Code, 2009 Edition, Section 10.2.3.7.2., 2009 IBC Section 803.1.2,
and 2009 IRC 316.6.
REVISION:
Wording in the second paragraph of the second page w as corrected due to a
typographical error and to reflect actual test conditions.
SIGNED FOR AND ON BEHALF OF
QAI LABORATORIES, INC.
David Bauchmoyer
Test Technician
J. Brian McDonald
Operations Manager
Page 1 of 13
THIS REPORT IS THE CONFIDENTIAL PROPERTY OF THE CLIENT ADDRESSED. THE REPORT MAY ONLY BE REPRODUCED IN FULL. PUBLICATION OF EXTRACTS FROM THIS REPORT IS
NOT PERMITTED WITHOUT WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM QAI. ANY LIABILITY ATTACHED THERETO IS LIMITED TO THE FEE CHARGED FOR THE INDIVIDUAL PROJECT FILE REFERENCED.
THE RESULTS OF THIS REPORT PERTAIN ONLY TO THE SPECIFIC SAMPLE(S) EVALUATED.
WWW.QAI.ORG
[email protected]
INTERNATIONAL FIREPROOFING TECHNOLOGY
Report No.: TJ1856-R
April 15, 2014
Page 2 of 13
Test Sample Description:
QAI Laboratories, Inc. conducted testing f or International Fireproofing Technology on “ BASF Enertite® NM
open cell spray applied polyurethane foam coated 18 average mil w et film thickness of DC315 (1 2 average
mils dry film thickness)” to evaluate heat release and flame spread properties w hen subjected to specific
ignition conditions. Testing w as conducted in accordance w ith NFPA 286, 2011 Edition. This testing w as
performed on December 19, 2013.
The test room w as built on November 11, 2013 by QAI Laboratory personnel prior to the application of t he
test sample. The three w alls consisted of 2 x 8 w ood studs, spaced 16 inches on center. The ceiling w as
constructed using 2 x 14 w ood joists, spaced 16 inches on center, running perpendicular to the side w alls.
The exterior ceiling and w alls w ere covered w ith 5/8” thick, Type X gypsum board. The final interior
dimensions w ere 8 feet high, 8 feet w ide and 12 feet deep.
On November 13, 2013, representatives from Croft Insulation sprayed the stud cavities w ith approximately
7 ½ inches of BASF Enertite® NM open cell spray applied polyurethane foam. The joist cavities w ere filled
w ith approximately 14 ½ inches of BASF Enertite® NM open cell spray applied polyurethane foam. This
spray foam insulation has an advertised density of 0.6 lbs/ft ³. Density measured from the tested room w as
0.65 lbs/ft ³. The back corners of the room are constructed so that they meet the criteria of NFPA 286.
On December 5 th – 6th, 2013, representatives from International Fireproof Technology, Inc. coated the test
module w ith an application of 18 mils w et film thickness (measured 12 mils dry film thickness using
medallion method) coating of DC315.
This room w as placed into a conditioning room w ith conditions that meet the requirement of this standard
for at least 48 hours prior to testing. The temperature of the test chamber prior to test w as 71° F (22° C)
and the relative humidity w as 38% .
Ignition Source:
The ignition source for the test is a gas burner w ith a nominal 12 by 12 inch orifice, filled w ith a minimum 4
inch layer of Ottaw a sand. The top surface of the burner through w hich the gas is applied is positioned 12
inches above the floor. The burner enclosure w as placed 1 inch aw ay from each w all in the test corner,
opposite the door.
Burner Gas Flow:
CP Grade Propane w as used for burner supply gas. A calibrated mass flow meter (Asset A300110, due for
calibration 3/28/14) w as used to meter flow to the burner. The 40 kW 5 minute exposure flow ed 27 l/min
Propane and the 160 kW exposure flow ed 108 l/min Propane. These numbers w ere based upon the
follow ing constant: 1.485 kW min/l.
Page 2 of 13
INTERNATIONAL FIREPROOFING TECHNOLOGY
Report No.: TJ1856-R
April 15, 2014
Page 3 of 13
Compartment Geometry:
The interior dimensions of the floor of the fire test room, w hen the specimens are in place, measures 8 by
12 feet. The finished ceiling is 8 feet + /- 0.5 inches above the floor. The four w alls are right angles
defining the compartment. The compartment contains a 30 + / - 0.25 by 80 + /- 0.25 inch doorw ay in the
center of one of the 8 by 8 foot w alls. No other openings w ere present to provide ventilation.
Heat Release Rate Information:
All Heat Release Rate information obtained during this test utilized oxygen consumption calorimetry. The
equation used for calculation is as follow s:
Thermocouple Placement:
Doorw ay
Quadrant I
Quadrant II
Center
Quadrant III
Quadrant IV
FIGURE 1. Thermocouple Locations
Page 3 of 13
INTERNATIONAL FIREPROOFING TECHNOLOGY
Report No.: TJ1856-R
April 15, 2014
Page 4 of 13
VISUAL OBSERVATIONS and DISCUSSIONS OF PEFORMANCE:
0:00:00
0:01:00
0:02:00
0:03:00
0:04:00
0:05:00
0:06:00
0:08:00
0:10:00
0:12:00
0:13:00
0:14:00
0:15:00
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Sand diffusion burner lit to 40 kW flame
Light smoke and little contribution from w all
Flame height leveling off at around 4 feet from floor
Continued light smoke development, very little smoke contribution
Little change in conditions above
Sand diffusion burner increased to 160 kW flame
Significant smoke increase, flames hitting ceiling
Minimal contribution of flame from w alls, smoke dark in color
Little change in conditions above
Flame intensity and smoke development seem to be decreasing somew hat
Continued steady performance
Fairly steady flame intensity and smoke developed throughout test
NFPA 286 test complete, flames immediately self -extinguish after gas shut off
Flame Spread and Discussion: (video record on file)
Flame spread of the sample w as minimal. Only slight and negligible contribution from the test sample w as not ed
around flames from burner for the first 5 minutes of test . From that point forw ard there w as no significant
contribution of material to the intensity of flaming. Flames did not reach the extremities of the test module and
flashover, as defined in the specified test designation, did not occur.
Smoke Density:
A peak duct smoke value of 10% (90% obscured) and a Peak Smoke Release Rate w as measured to be 1.32 m²/s
14 minutes and 58 seconds after ignition.
The smoke obscuration reading w as taken in t he center of a 16 inch diameter duct.
Heat Flux Information:
The heat flux gauge registered a peak Heat Flux of 5.1 kW/m ² at 12:45 into test.
CHARRING MEASUREMENT:
All charring as a result of testing this assembly w as limited to the corner of the burner placement . There w as a
“ V” pattern of char in the corner of ignition that w ent all the w ay to the ceiling, starting at the burner and ending
up charring a section measuring approximately four feet in both directions to the ceiling. The ceiling itself w as
completely black w ith char and soot deposition as w as each of the three w alls measuring approximately 2 feet
dow n from the ceiling.
Page 4 of 13
INTERNATIONAL FIREPROOFING TECHNOLOGY
Report No.: TJ1856-R
April 15, 2014
Page 5 of 13
FLASHOVER POTENTIAL:
In Section 1.3.1 of NFPA 286, the definition of flashover is an event w here any tw o of the foll ow ing
conditions have been attained:





Heat Release Rate exceeds 1 MW
Heat Flux at the floor exceeds 20 kW/m²
Average upper layer temperature exceeds 600 ºC (1112ºF)
Flames exit doorw ay
Autoignition of a paper target on the floor occurs
For purposes these t est results, the follow ing compares the standard’ s definition of flashover w ith actual test
results for comparison purposes:





Peak Heat Release Rate of 234 kW
Heat Flux at floor – Peak of 5.1 kW/m²
Average upper average temperature – 756ºF (402ºC)
Flames did not exit doorw ay
Both paper targets undamaged during test
LIFE SAFETY CODE:
From NFPA 101, Section 10.2.3.7.2, and 2009 IBC 803.1.2.1, t he follow ing conditions shall be met w hen
using the test protocol of NFPA 286, Standard Methods of Fire Tests for Evaluating Contribution Wall and
Ceiling Interior Finish to Room Fire Grow th:




Flames shall not spread to the ceiling during the 40 kW flame exposure.
During the 160 kW flame exposure, the follow ing criteria shall be met:
o Flames shall not spread to the out er extremities of the sample of the 8 ft x 12 ft w all
o Flashover shall not occur
The peak heat release rate throughout the test shall not exceed 800 kW.
The total smoke released shall not exceed 1000 m²
Page 5 of 13
INTERNATIONAL FIREPROOFING TECHNOLOGY
Report No.: TJ1856-R
April 15, 2014
Page 6 of 13
RESULTS:
Temperature vs. Time Chart:
FIGURE 2. Temperature vs. Time
Maximum Peak Temperatures:
Doorw ay
Center
Quadrant
Quadrant
Ignition
Quadrant
Quadrant
I
II
III
IV
594° F (312° C)
712° F (378° C)
829° F (443° C)
670° F (354° C)
1211° F (655° C)
649° F (343° C)
625° F (329° C)
PEAK AVERAGE UPPER LAYER TEMP – 756ºF (402ºC)
Page 6 of 13
INTERNATIONAL FIREPROOFING TECHNOLOGY
Report No.: TJ1856-R
April 15, 2014
Page 7 of 13
Heat Release Rate vs. Time Chart:
FIGURE 3. Heat Release Rate vs. Time
Numerical Values:
0-5 min average (kW)
5-15 min average (kW)
Peak Heat Release Rate
Total Heat Released During 15 min Test
Page 7 of 13
46
208
234 kW @ 13:36
138.9
INTERNATIONAL FIREPROOFING TECHNOLOGY
Report No.: TJ1856-R
April 15, 2014
Page 8 of 13
Smoke Obscuration and Smoke Release Rate:
FIGURE 4. Smoke Release Rate vs. Time
Numerical Values:
0-5 min average (m²/s)
5-15 min average (m²/s)
Peak Smoke Release Rate
Total Smoke Released
Peak Obscuration
Page 8 of 13
0.09
0.84
1.32 m²/s @ 14:58
558.6
80%
INTERNATIONAL FIREPROOFING TECHNOLOGY
Report No.: TJ1856-R
April 15, 2014
Page 9 of 13
PHOTO: BARRELS
Barrels of Product used for Testing
Page 9 of 13
INTERNATIONAL FIREPROOFING TECHNOLOGY
Report No.: TJ1856-R
April 15, 2014
Page 10 of 13
PHOTO: BEFORE TEST
Overall
Ignition Corner
Opposite Corner
Page 10 of 13
INTERNATIONAL FIREPROOFING TECHNOLOGY
Report No.: TJ1856-R
April 15, 2014
Page 11 of 13
PHOTOS: DURING TEST
Test Start
After 2 Minutes
After 3 Minutes
After 5 minutes
Page 11 of 13
INTERNATIONAL FIREPROOFING TECHNOLOGY
Report No.: TJ1856-R
April 15, 2014
Page 12 of 13
PHOTO: DURING TEST (Cont.)
After 6 Minutes
After 9 Minutes
After 13 Minutes
After 15 Minutes
Page 12 of 13
INTERNATIONAL FIREPROOFING TECHNOLOGY
Report No.: TJ1856-R
April 15, 2014
Page 13 of 13
PHOTO: AFTER TEST
Photos Immediately After Test
********
END OF REPORT
Page 13 of 13