ENERGY EFFICIENT VARIABLE FREQUENCY DRIVES AND SUBMERSIBLE PUMPS 1 Scott Barnes 1. Unitywater, Caboolture, QLD ABSTRACT This paper explains the process and results of trialling new sewage pump station technology with the aim of determining the technologies energy saving capabilities, when compared with existing equipment. The paper includes the methodology adopted while conducting the trials and a financial analysis of the resultant energy savings. INTRODUCTION The electricity costs in Queensland are forecast to increase above inflation over the next three years resulting in a substantial increase in operating costs for water utilities to operate both Sewage Pump Stations (SPS) and Water Pump Stations (WPS). This increase in electricity expenses and a need to reduce the carbon footprint has driven Unitywater to investigate energy efficient pumping technologies. Unitywater commissioned a field trial at sewage pump station BLI131, to determine the energy reduction capabilities of four products. Three of the products trialled are variants of Variable Frequency Drives (VFD), which are used to control the motor speed and torque of submersible pumps by varying motor input frequency and voltage. In addition to this, an energy efficient submersible pump (Flygt Experior) that is designed to operate with a partner pump controller (Flygt SmartRun) was also trialled. Five trials were conducted to assess the energy reduction properties of each technology and included: A standard VFD connected to the in situ submersible pump (trial 1); The Flygt SmartRun pump controller combined with its partner energy efficient submersible pump, the Flygt Experior (trial 2); The Flygt SmartRun pump controller connected to the existing in situ submersible pump (trial 3); The energy efficient Flygt Experior pump without the partner SmartRun pump controller (connected to the in situ auto transformer) (trial 4); and A new technology VFD connected to the in situ submersible pump (trial 5) PRODUCT DESCRIPTIONS Standard VFD VFD units reduce energy consumption by controlling the speed of the electric motor driving the pump. Typically if a VFD or equivalent is not installed the pump will start immediately at the maximum 50Hz, operate at this speed and finally instantaneously stop at 0Hz when the command is given. This type of operation cycle is very inefficient as the energy consumption spikes when the pumps start and stop. VFDs smooth out this cycle of energy spikes by ramping up and down to the required pump speed in a controlled fashion. VFDs are also able to be controlled through the use of a Programmable Logic Computer (PLC) that can be programmed to operate the pumps in an energy efficient manner that utilises reduced pump speed, dependent on the hydraulic load. In this trial Unitywater flow pacing software code was used to control the VFD. Flygt Experior Pump and Flygt SmartRun Pump Controller The Flygt Experior pump and Flygt SmartRun pump controller are new products to the Australian market. Both products have been designed specifically to be used together to improve pump reliability and efficiency. The Flygt Experior pump uses a newly designed energy efficient electric motor that is engineered to concentrate energy losses around the stator which keeps the motor as cool as possible. This prolongs the lifespan of the motor, increases efficiency and protects the pump bearings. The Flygt SmartRun pump controller is an integrated control unit that is pre-programmed to optimise pump operation by continually assessing and responding to the hydraulic load on the pump. This achieves energy savings by the pump continually operating on the optimal point of the pump curve. New Technology VFD The new technology VFD that was trialled is the same as a standard VFD, however, unlike a standard VFD this product also optimises the mains power supply into the motor of the submersible pump. The product detects the motor load variations at a high sampling rate and regulates both the current and voltage delivered to the motor, producing energy savings by continuously operating at the optimal point of the power curve. Figure 1: SCADA Page Displaying Power Consumption and Total Daily Flow METHODOLOGY The energy reduction capabilities of each technology were compared against the energy used by the existing in situ equipment at the chosen sewage pump station. Trial Site SPS BLI131 located at Oro street Bli Bli, on the Sunshine Coast was constructed in 1977 and subsequently upgraded with new pumps and a new switchboard in 1999, which are still in operation. The specification for BLI131 for the upgrade in 1999 is listed in table1. Table 1: Pump Station Specifications Flow rate (l/s) 57 Head (m) No. of pumps 28.5 2 wet well submersible 63% Pump Type Pump Efficiency Electrical Requirements (kW) kilowatt hours/ kilolitres pumped Flow Meter Installed 25.3 .1407 Trials Once the measuring devices were verified as accurate and functional, the in situ equipment was trialled to give a baseline figure for comparison, followed by trials designed to measure the energy saving effectiveness of the different technology. Table 2: Equipment Trials Each trial was designed to examine the energy reduction capabilities of one piece of equipment except for trial two where the combined energy reduction capabilities of both Flygt products were examined. This trial was performed because the manufacturer specifies that in order to achieve the maximum efficiency and reliability gains, both the Flygt Experior pump and Flygt SmartRun pump controller are designed to be installed together. yes RESULTS The two submersible pumps are connected to autotransformers in the switchboard. All energy savings in this trial are based on energy consumption comparisons with the in situ installation i.e. a 10% energy saving means a 10% energy saving when compared to the normal in situ installation. Energy and Flow Measurement An alteration was made to the SCADA system at BLI131 to enable measurement of total daily energy usage (kilowatt hours (kWh)) and total daily flows (kilolitres (kL)) of pump number one. This allowed the specific energy of the SPS to be calculated (kilowatt hours per 1000 litres pumped) and, therefore, direct energy consumption comparisons between the products being trialled. Figure 1 displays the amended SCADA page for BLI131 and the totalised energy and flow amounts. Figure 2 displays that, in terms of a single piece of equipment, the Flygt Experior pump has the largest energy saving impact. However, the Flygt Experior pump combined with the Flygt SmartRun pump controller produces an energy saving of almost 57% when compared with the in situ equipment. A 57% energy saving at BLI131 correlates to an electricity cost saving (at current electricity prices) of $13,230 and a reduction of 72 tonnes of CO2 per annum. Figure 2: Percentage Energy Savings of Each Trial greater return when compared to trials 1 and 5. The three trials that resulted in the highest IRR involved either one or both of the Flygt products and also resulted in the same payback period of three years. Trial 2 that assessed both the Flygt controller and pump, has the greatest Net Present Value (NPV) over the five year study period. Trial 2 also has the highest initial capital cost, however, the NPV combined with the greatest reduction in CO2 emissions could be used to justify the added initial expense. CONCLUSION Figure 3: Electricity Cost Savings and CO2 Emission Reduction per annum. The trial of the Flygt system also highlighted additional operational benefits that included: Ease of system installation, which required no software coding or specialist engineering; Zero pump blockages throughout the trial, due to the newly designed Flygt pump impeller and pump cleaning function built into the SmartRun pump controller. Financial Analysis The financial analysis of the five trials is based on monthly electricity bills supplied by Unitywater’s energy retailer for BLI131. All energy efficiency figures used in the analysis are derived from the five trials and based on comparisons with the in situ installation. The financial analysis was done over a five year period and the assumptions include: No inflation has been applied; No tax has been included in the analysis; No escalation factor for electricity pricing has been applied; The study period for the analysis is 5 years; A 7.11% discount factor has been applied; The energy savings have been applied from the results of each trial. Table 3: Financial Results of Each Trial The Internal Rate of Return (IRR) of trials 1, 2 and 3 are very similar (18-19%) and provide a much Trial 2 involving the Flygt Experior pump and Flygt SmartRun pump controller resulted in the largest energy saving of 57%, which in turn results in a first year electricity cost saving of $13,230 and a 72 tonne reduction in the carbon footprint of BLI131. Over a five year period the NPV of this option is $19,124, with the only downside being the upfront capital cost which is the largest of the five trials. The initial upfront cost is offset by the strong financial and environmental outcomes when both the Flygt products are installed at the SPS. The Flygt Experior pump and SmartRun pump controllers range in sizes from 2.4 kilowatts to 70 kilowatts with this size range accounting for over 70% of Unitywater’s sewage pump stations. A five site expanded trial of the Flygt technology is currently underway at Unitywater, with the aim to determine whether the same energy savings are realised at SPS of differing system curves. This expanded trial aligns with Unitywater’s commitment to drive down operational expenditure and lower Unitywater’s carbon footprint. Trial Number Trial 1 Trial 2 Trial 3 Trial 4 Trial 5 New Equipment Trialled Standard VFD Flygt Experior Pump and Flygt SmartRun Controller Flygt SmartRun Controller only Flygt Experior Pump only New Technology VFD In Situ Autotransformer used in Trial No No In Situ Pump Used in Trial Yes No No Yes No Yes No Yes Table 2: Equipment Trials Equipment Trialled Trial 1 - Standard VFD Only Trial 2 - Flygt Experior Pump and Flygt SmartRun Controller Trial 3 - Flygt SmartRun Controller only Trial 4 - Flygt Experior Pump only Trial 5 - New Technology VFD Only Net Present Value ($) -2218 19124 Internal Rate of Return -10% 18% Discounted Payback Period N/A 3 years 5834 15279 3232 19% 19% 9% 3 years 3 years 4 years Table 3: Financial Results of Each Trial
© Copyright 2024 ExpyDoc