Cost Effective Solution to Eliminate Flooding of Six Mile Creek in SA

9/12/2014
Texas Floodplain Managers Association Fall Seminar
September 4, 2014
Samantha Martin, CFM
Water Resources EIT, CDM Smith
Damien J Herrera, PE
Senior Project Manager, CDM Smith
Edgar A Munoz, PE
Project Manager, CDM Smith
Shiva Sandrana, PE, PH
Project Manager, Bexar County
•
•
•
•
•
•
The Problems
Potential Solutions & Costs
Constraints
Recommended Plan
More Constraints
Cost Avoidance
1
9/12/2014
Project extent is
approximately 6
miles from its
confluence with the
San Antonio River
to upstream of I-35.
The existing
trapezoidal channel
is concrete-lined
upstream of
Roosevelt Avenue
and natural to its
engineered outfall.
More than 100 homes and 9 road crossings are at risk of flooding.
The original South Flores Street Bridge overtopped frequently and
by as much as 9 feet in the 1 percent flood.
2
9/12/2014
1
Clamp
Avenue
2
Garnett
Avenue
Commercial Avenue
Shemya Avenue
Dorsey Street
Moursund Boulevard
• Primarily flood conveyance capacity with three reaches
exhibiting overbank flooding due to undersized bridges and
channels.
• 304 parcels & 200 structures in the floodplain.
West Baetz Boulevard
West Baetz Boulevard
3
East Ansley Road
3
9/12/2014
South Flores St.
Deck El. = 567.1
1% Ult. WSE = 576.95
Depth = 9.85 ft
Roosevelt Rd.
Deck El. = 573.38
1% Ult WSE= 575.88
Depth = 2.50 ft
•
•
•
•
Alternative 1 – Increase Flood Storage
Alternative 2 – Flood Storage with Channel Improvement
Alternative 3 – Channel Improvements/Bridge Replacements
Alternative 4 – Only Raise South Flores (Buyouts and
Floodproofing)
Note: Raising the South Flores Bridge was included in all of the
Options
4
9/12/2014
Alternative
Option
Cost Estimate
1. Increase Flood Storage
FSA 2 and FSA6
$27.7 Million
2. Increase Flood Storage & Channel
Improvements
FSA2 & FSA6, CCR1,CCR2, & CCR4
$55.7 Million
3. 1 Channel Improvements &
Bridge Replacements
CCR1, CCR2, CCR2 Bridge Replacements,
CCR3, Roosevelt Bridge Replacement, and
CCR4
$44.5 Million
3.2 Channel Improvements & Bridge CCR3 and CCR4
Replacements
$29.6 Million
3.3 Channel Improvements & Bridge CCR3 and CCR4 Truncated
Replacements
$25.1 Million
3.4 Channel Improvements & Bridge CCR3 and CCR4 (From h-pile wall to
Replacements
conventional wall)
$19 Million
4. Only Raise South Flores; Buyouts
& Floodproofing
$33.2 Million
Only Raise South Flores; Buyouts &
Floodproofing
Ultimately, there was enough conveyance in the final
channel design that no flood storage areas were necessary.
5
9/12/2014
• Solution must protect for 1% Chance Future Flows
• Use Existing Right of Way (ROW)
– Had to use retaining wall in limited ROW spaces
• Utility crossings
• Provisions of the San Antonio UDC
– Freeboard (1ft channel; 1.5ft bridges)
– Flow Velocity (Max 15 ft/s)
– No downstream water surface elevation rise or increase in velocities
6
9/12/2014
7
9/12/2014
•
•
•
•
7000ft of Channel Improvements
1 Bridge Replacement – Roosevelt
South Flores Bridge Replacement (Completed 2011)
Final Project Construction Cost $18.7 Million ($11.2 Million
CCR3, $7.5 Million CCR4)
• One 3-ft drop structure between Roosevelt and South Flores
Bridges
• CCR3 Transition Under Design
•
•
•
•
•
Stage increases downstream of project
Channel transition downstream of project
Geotechnical constraints
New survey data didn’t align with previous data
Cost
8
9/12/2014
• Streamlined Design:
–
–
–
–
–
Minimized number of drop structures from 5 to 1
Took online/offline storage options out of design
Reduced the variation in cross section dimensions
Removed CCR1 and CCR2
Proposing to Truncate upper part of the original design. Will potentially
save $2 million.
• Design
– Saved over $3M on retaining wall costs by using cast-in-place instead of
h-pile and pre-cast panels.
9
9/12/2014
Contact Information
Samantha Martin
[email protected]
Shiva Sandrana
[email protected]
10