“PET Molecular Imaging in oncology: drug development or (and?) routine clinical usage” Genesis 9 December 2014 David Gauden, Head of Development www.blueearthdiagnostics.com Introduction ● Biotech funded by Syncona Partners, based Oxford Science Park ● Licensing of IP from GE Healthcare ● Mission : To develop and commercialize Fluciclovine [18F], aka FACBC, a PET amino acid imaging agent for the detection of recurrent prostate cancer and glioma ● Experienced management team medical imaging / drug development. 2 In this presentation • • • Review rationale for amino acid PET imaging in cancer and some of the radiolabelled amino acids that have been developed Discuss challenges for transition of molecular imaging from ‘scientifically interesting’ to ‘clinically & commercially useful’ Review unmet imaging needs in prostate cancer clinical decision making and the ongoing development of new tracers for PSA recurrent prostate cancer Disclaimer: For educational purposes only. Some of the products discussed are still under development and may never come to market. 3 Scientific basis for amino acid PET imaging in oncology ● Cancer cells are rapidly proliferating and may have aberrant cell energetics. Amino acids are in demand for both anabolism & catabolism. ● Mammalian cells may have many aa transporters, four of which in particular are over-expressed in cancer cells: ASCT2; LAT1; xCT and ATB0,+ (1). ● Certain amino acids (leucine, glutamine) are involved in prooncogenic signaling via mTOR, activity in prostate cancer cells is linked to androgen driven LAT1 & LAT3 expression (2) ● Amino acid metabolism as a drug target is not new, with drugs such as asparaginase used in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia and LAT1 transporting the anti-cancer drug melphalan (3). More recently glutaminase inhibition has also been shown to be a viable drug target (4). (1) V. Ganapathy et al., Pharmacol. & Therap. 121 (2009); (2) Wang et al, Cancer Res. 71(24) (2011); (3) Fuchs & Bode, Semin. Cancer Biol. 15 (2005); (4) Hensley et al, J. Clin. Invest. 123 (9) (2013) 4 Radiolabelled amino acids (5) CO2H H 2N H 2N CO2H OH 18F O FET 18F FACBC H 2N 18F CO2H MeAIB 18F S 11CH MET FACBC CH3 HN CO2H CO2H 3 H 2N CO2H CO2H 18F OH CO2H H 2N 3 HN FDOPA H 2N 11CH MeFAMP H 2N CO2H H 2N CO2H 18F 5-FAsu H 2N CO2H 18F 18F N N N O AFETP 4-FGln NH2 CO2H 18F CO2H 4-FPGlu Extracellular A AA Na+ ● F-DOPA used in neuroendocrine tumors and Parkinson’s disease; [18F] FET and [11C] MET in glioma; fluciclovine transported by ASCT2 & LAT1 (6) but not metabolised or incorporated into protein. (5) McConathy, J. et al., 2012. Radiohalogenated nonnatural amino acids as PET and SPECT tumor imaging agents, Med Res Rev. 32: 868-905. (6) Oka et al. Nuc. Med & Biol. 39 (2012) 5 Challenges to wider use of new PET tracers in oncology • Most PET agents used in drug development are available at few centres (mostly neuro) • Molecular Imaging Agents Drug development tools A (very) limited number are widely available for diagnostic use, even fewer with NDA/MAA • Widespread clinical use CT/MR/SPECT and FDG have shown widespread utility in oncology applications, with some exceptions • So…how do we go from beautiful science to commercial use for new tracers? • Find an initial ‘killer app’ for product • • • high un-met need clear therapy ‘decision node’ willingness to pay [18F] FDG [11C] Raclopride 6 The ‘niche’ of biochemically recurrent prostate cancer Diagnosis & staging Surgery and or Radiotherapy (incl IGRT) PSA recurrence (20-40%) 3 Cure • Clinicians identify 5 areas for better imaging: 2 1 • Biopsy guidance after repeat negative TRUS biopsy • Staging high risk primary cases for LN or bone involvement • 1o radiotherapy planning • Detection of local vs distant PSA recurrence (BCR) • Monitoring of progression or response in late stage disease Surveillance Progression PSA, bone scan +/- CT, MR, US PET based stratification Prostate bed Pelvic region 4 Metastatic disease Curative salvage (e.g. RT ± ADT) Systemic therapy (e.g. ADT, Zytiga Chemotherapy) Monitor with PSA Monitor with PSA, CT, bone scan, PET? Monitor with PSA (7) Choueri et al, J Urology Vol. 179, 906-910, March 2008 • In BCR choice made between focal curative or systemic therapy • Only 10-20% BCR patients in the USA have positive findings with conventional imaging (7) 5 Non FDG PET tracers in BCR Pca • • • Several recent reviews, see below (8,9,10,11). Choline & acetate. Meta-analyses: 11C Cho more sensitive than 18F Cho in 1o LN staging (9); 18F cho more sens. in BCR, inc. LR & bone (10); CHO higher sens vs 99mTc BS (11). 11C Ac, small intra-pt study seems similar to Cho (12) 18F NaF intra-pt study shows higher sensitivity vs 18F-Cho for spinal mets, however with much lower specificity (13). • Fluciclovine 18F: In 28 pts with negative conventional imaging, (mean PSA 2.9) 11C Cho visualised 7 lesions / 5 pts, fluciclovine detected 18 lesions in 10 patients (14). • Many PSMA (PET/SPECT: 99mTc, 18F, 68Ga, 89Zr) industrial effort aligned with stratifying PSMA therapy. In a 37 pt study (avg PSA 11.1) total of 78 lesions in 32 pts were detected with 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT & 56 in 26 patients using Choline PET/CT (15). Impact of PSMA heterogeneity (16) on diagnostic utility is not established. Fluciclovine (18F) PET image of patient with suspected recurrence of prostate cancer. Following Fluciclovine (18F) injection, 10x3mm node detected with SUV 4.6 vs background SUV of 1. Radical Prostatectomy in Sept 2011. Radiotherapy, no Androgen deprivation therapy. Rising PSA Aug 6 2013. Negative conventional imaging Oct 8th 2013 Image reproduced courtesy of Dr Cristina Nanni, Ospedale St’Orsola, Bologna, Italy (8) Yu et al, Am J Nuc Med Mol Img 2014; 4(6) (9) Evangelista et al Eur Urol. 2013 Jun;63(6); (10) Evangelista et al Clin Nucl Med. 2013 May;38(5):305-14; (11) von Eyben FE and Kairemo Nucl Med Commun 2014;35. (12) Buchegger et al Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging (2014) 41; (13) Poulsen et al BJU Int 2014 Dec: 114(6); (14) Nanni et al, Clinical Genitourinary Cancer April 2014; (15) Afshar-Oromieh et al Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging (2014) 41 (16) Mannweiler et al Pathol. Oncol. Res. (2009) 15:167–172 8 CONCLUSION Newer PET molecular imaging agents have the potential to solve key diagnostic challenges in oncology applications where anatomic imaging and FDG perform poorly. Widespread availability of novel PET agents for diagnostic use will enhance access for drug development researchers wishing to investigate new mechanisms of action, such as those associated with amino acid metabolism or specific receptor based imaging. THANK YOU 9
© Copyright 2024 ExpyDoc