The Interplay of Intrinsic Needs and Motives in Explaining Addictive Behavior on Facebook Philipp Masur University of Hohenheim, Germany 1. Theoretical Background 2. Method 3. Results 4. Discussion 2 Early efforts in conceptualizing addictive behavior in online environments Literature review the term ‘Internet addiction’ describes problematic forms of Internet use (e.g., Griffiths, 1999; Young, 1996, 1998) no consensus on a clear definition of Internet addiction no entry in current diagnostic manuals, e.g., Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.; American Psychiatric Association, 2013) 3 Internet-induced psychopathologies manifest themselves very differently Theoretical background ‘Internet addiction’ does not determine a clear object of the addiction (Griffiths, 1999; 2012) Internet usage patterns have become very diverse different affordances and various new gratifications need for a more specific view on the addictive use of specific Internet applications 4 Self-determination theory and addictive behavior online Theoretical background innate psychological needs (such as autonomy, competence, and relatedness) constitute the basis for their motivation, behavior, and psychological well-being (Ryan, 1995; Ryan & Deci, 2000) relationship between intrinsic need satisfaction and obsessive behavior was found (e.g., Przybylski, Weinstein, Ryan, & Rigby, 2009) using SNSs can also satisfy the intrinsic needs for competence and autonomy (Reinecke, Vorderer & Knop, in press) 5 Uses & gratification research and addictive behavior Theoretical background postulates that users actively choose media stimuli in order to fulfill specific needs. virtual community building, information, entertainment, and relationship maintenance positively related to Internet addiction (Song, Larose, Eastin & Lin, 2004) Motives like self-presentation and relationship building were found to predict problematic SNS use (Chen & Kim, 2013) 6 The influence of intrinsic needs on SNS addiction is mediated by motives of SNS use Hypothetic model Motive 1 Autonomy Competence Relatedness SNS addiction Motive … INTRINSIC NEEDS MOTIVES SYMPTOMS OF ADDICTION 7 The influence of intrinsic needs on SNS addiction is mediated by motives of SNS use Hypotheses The level of perceived autonomy in daily life is negatively related to the H1 motives for self-presentation and escapism which, in turn, are positively related to SNS addiction (mediation hypothesis 1). The level of perceived competence in daily life is negatively related to the H2 motives for information seeking and self-presentation which, in turn, are positively related to SNS addiction (mediation hypothesis 2). The level of perceived relatedness in daily life is negatively related to the H3 motives for self-presentation and for meeting new people which, in turn, are positively related to SNS addiction (mediation hypothesis 3). 8 1. Theoretical Background 2. Method 3. Results 4. Discussion 9 Data collection and sample characteristics Methodology July to August 2012 Socio Scientific Panel (Leiner, 2012) non-representative, convenience sample Sample size: N = 581 Gender: 67% females Age: M = 29 years (SD = 11 years) Average time spent on Facebook per day: M = 48 minutes (SD = 57 minutes) 10 Design of the online survey Methodology: Scales and Measures SNS addiction scale (based on the Internet Addiction Scale by Hahn & Jerusalem, 2010) five dimensions: loss of control, tolerance, withdrawal syndrome, negative consequences for social relations, negative consequences for work and performance MTotal = 1.74 (SD = 0.57) “My thoughts often rotate around Facebook, even when I am not online” 11 Design of the online survey Methodology: Scales and Measures motives of SNS use (based on prior U&G research) seven dimensions: escapism, self-presentation, entertainment, information seeking, socializing, meeting new people “I use Facebook to take my mind off things” intrinsic need satisfaction scale (La Guardia et al., 2000) three dimensions: autonomy, competence, relatedness “In my daily life, I feel free to be who I am.” 12 Computing parallel multiple mediation models Methodology: Data Analysis SPSS extension PROCESS (Hayes, 2012) 95% bias-corrected confidence intervals (CIs) for all effects were calculated through 5,000 bootstrapped samples the null hypothesis is rejected at the α-level of significance if the confidence intervals do not include 0 (Preacher & Hayes, 2008) it is often not appreciated that statistics in their original metrics can be considered effect sizes if they are directly interpretable (Preacher & Kelly, 2011) 13 1. Theoretical Background 2. Method 3. Results 4. Discussion 14 Classification criteria and cut-off-points Prevalence of SNS addiction mean score of 3 or above on all five dimensions classifies SNS addiction mean score between 2.5 and 3 on all five dimensions classifies “at risk of becoming addicted” in order to establish an optimal cut-off point, the scale should be validated in clinical settings 15 Only 2.9 percent can be classified as SNS addicts Prevalence of SNS addiction 2,9% 9% Not Addicted At Risk Addicted 88,1% 16 The indirect effect of perceived autonomy on SNS addiction (Parallel multiple mediation model 1) Hypothesis 1 supported selfpresentation 0.20** -0.31** autonomy SNS addiction n.s. -0.33** 0.23** PROCESS (Hayes, 2012) Bias corrected confindence intervals escapism Bootstrapping with 5000 samples Indirect effect: -0.14, 95% CI [-0.19, -0.09] Total effect: -0.14, 95% CI [-0.21, -0.07] 17 The indirect effect of perceived competence on SNS addiction (Parallel multiple mediation model 2) Hypothesis 2 supported information seeking 0.20** -0.14* SNS addiction -0.12** competence -0.23** PROCESS (Hayes, 2012) Bias corrected confindence intervals Bootstrapping with 5000 samples 0.21** selfpresentation Indirect effect: -0.07, 95% CI [-0.12, -0.03] Total effect: -0.19, 95% CI [-0.26, -0.12] 18 The indirect effect of perceived competence on SNS addiction (Parallel multiple mediation model 3) Hypothesis 3 supported selfpresentation 0.28** -0.30* relatedness SNS addiction n.s. -0.21** PROCESS (Hayes, 2012) Bias corrected confindence intervals Bootstrapping with 5000 samples 0.06* meeting new people Indirect effect: -0.10, 95% CI [-0.14, -0.06] Total effect: -0.10, 95% CI [-0.17, -0.03] 19 1. Theoretical Background 2. Method 3. Results 4. Discussion 20 SNS use may compensate for thwarted intrinsic needs, but seeking gratifications may become compulsive Discussion complex interaction between offline need satisfaction and online gratification seeking user with low levels of intrinsic need satisfaction in daily life may find corresponding gratifications in using SNS paradoxical picture of SNS use: SNS offer opportunities for satisfaction of central human needs, but these gratifications may promote the risk of SNS addiction 21 SNS use may compensate for thwarted intrinsic needs, but seeking gratifications may become compulsive Limitations and conclusion Potential limitations Non-representative sample Addictive behaviors are complex psychological disorders; a self-report instrument may oversimplify the actual phenomenon Cross-sectional design Future research Do thwarted intrinsic needs and corresponding gratifications explain also other excessive behavioral patterns and addictions? 22 People with low levels of intrinsic need satisfaction in their daily life, seek compensating gratifications when using social network sites. Yet, this gratification seeking might become compulsive and foster addictive behavior. 23 Thank you for your attention! Please cite as: Masur, P. K., Reinecke, L., Ziegele, M. & Quiring, O. (2014). The interplay of intrinsic need satisfaction and Facebook specific motives in explaining addictive behavior on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 39, 376-386. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.047 Philipp Masur M.A. University of Hohenheim Department of Media Psychology (540F) Wollgrasweg 23 70599 Stuttgart Mail: [email protected] Phone: (0711) 459-24792 References Chen, H.-T., & Kim, Y. (2013). Problematic use of social network Sites: The interactive relationship between gratifications sought and privacy concerns. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16(11), 1-7. doi:10.1089/cyber.2011.0608 Hahn, A., & Jerusalem, M. (2010). Die Internetsuchtskala (ISS): Psychometrische Eigenschaften und Validität (The Internet addiction scale: Psychometric characteristics and validity). In D. Mücken, A. Teske, F. Rehbein, & te Wildt, B. T. (Eds.), Prävention, Diagnostik und Therapie von Computerspielabhängigkeit (pp. 185-204). Lengerich: Pabst Science Publishers. Hayes, A. F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling. <http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf> Retrieved 13.11.13. Griffiths, M. D. (1999). Internet addiction: Fact or fiction? Psychologist, 12, 246-250. Griffiths, M. D. (2012). Facebook addiction: Concerns, criticism, and recommendations - A Response to Andreassen and colleagues. Psychological Reports, 110(2), 518-520. doi:10.2466/01.07.18.PR0.110.2.518-520 La Guardia, J. G., Ryan, R. M., Couchman, C. E., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Within-person variation in security of attachment: A self-determination theory perspective on attachment, need fulfillment, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(3), 367-384. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.79.3.367 Preacher, K. J., & Kelley, K. (2011). Effect size measures for mediation models: Quantitative strategies for communicating indirect effects. Psychological Methods, 16(2), 93-115. doi:10.1037/a0022658 Przybylski, A. K., Weinstein, N., Ryan, R. M., & Rigby, C. S. (2009). Having to versus wanting to play: Background and consequences of harmonious versus obsessive engagement in video games. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12(5), 485–492. doi:10.1089/cpb.2009.0083 Reinecke, L., Vorderer, P. & Knop, K. (in press). The role of intrinsic and extrinsic need satisfaction for the enjoyment of Facebook use. Journal of Communication. Ryan, R. M. (1995). Psychological needs and the facilitation of integrative processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(3), 397-427. doi:10.1111/j.14676494.1995.tb00501.x Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. doi:10.1037//0003-066X.55.1.68 Song, I., Larose, R., Eastin, M. S., & Lin, C. A. (2004). Internet gratifications and Internet addiction: On the uses and abuses of new media. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7(4), 384-394. doi:10.1089/cpb.2004.7.384 Young, K. S. (1996). Addictive use of the Internet: A case that breaks the stereotype. Psychological Reports, 79, 899-902. doi:10.2466/pr0.1996.79.3.899 Young, K. S. (1998). Caught in the net: How to Recognize the Signs of Internet Addiction--and a Winning Strategy for Recovery. New York: Wiley.
© Copyright 2024 ExpyDoc