Decompositions of symmetry using models based on
f -divergence for square contingency tables
Yusuke Saigusa
(Tokyo University of Science)
Kouji Tahata
(Tokyo University of Science)
Sadao Tomizawa (Tokyo University of Science)
1. ͡Ίʹ
ɹߦͱྻ͕ॱংͷ͋Δಉ͡ྨ͔ΒͳΔ r ʷ r ਖ਼ํׂදΛߟ͑ɼ(i, j) ηϧ֬Λ pij
ͱ͢Δ (i = 1, . . . , r; j = 1, . . . , r)ɽ͜ͷͱ͖ɼରশ (S) Ϟσϧ࣍ͷΑ͏ʹఆٛ͞ΕΔ
(Bowker [3])ɿ
pij = ψij
(i = 1, . . . , r; j = 1, . . . , r),
ψij = ψji .
ͨͩ͠
S Ϟσϧओର֯ઢʹؔ͢Δηϧ֬ͷରশߏΛࣔ͢ɽS Ϟσϧ͕Γཱͨͳ͍ͱ͖ɼ
͍͔ͭ͘ͷ֦ுͨ͠Ϟσϧ͕ఏҊ͞Ε͍ͯΔɽͨͱ͑ɼ४ରশ (QS) Ϟσϧ࣍ͷ
Α͏ʹఆٛ͞ΕΔ (Caussinus [4])ɿ
pij = αi βj ψij
(i = 1, . . . , r; j = 1, . . . , r),
ͨͩ͠
ψij = ψji .
QS ϞσϧΦοζൺ θ(i<j;s<t) = (pis pjt )/(pjs pit ) Λ༻͍ͯ࣍ͷΑ͏ʹදͤΔɿ
θ(i<j;s<t) = θ(s<t;i<j)
(1 ≤ i < j ≤ r; 1 ≤ s < t ≤ r).
QS Ϟσϧओର֯ઢʹؔ͢ΔΦοζൺͷରশߏΛࣔ͢ɽ·ͨɼपลಉ (MH) Ϟσ
ϧ࣍ͷΑ͏ʹఆٛ͞ΕΔ (Stuart [7])ɿ
pi· = p·i
(i = 1, . . . , r),
ͨͩ͠
pi· =
r
X
pit ,
p·i =
t=1
r
X
psi .
s=1
MH Ϟσϧɼߦมͱྻมͷपล͕ಉͰ͋Δ͜ͱΛ͍ࣔͯ͠Δɽ
Caussinus [4] ࣍ͷఆཧΛ༩͑ͨɿ
ఆཧ 1ɽS Ϟσϧ͕ΓཱͭͨΊͷඞཁे݅ɼQS Ϟσϧͱ MH Ϟσϧͷ྆ํ
͕Γཱͭ͜ͱͰ͋Δɽ
{us } Λॱংͷ͋ΔطͷείΞͱ͢Δ (s = 1, . . . , r; u1 ≤ u2 ≤ · · · ≤ ur ; u1 < ur )ɽ
͜ͷͱ͖ɼॱং४ରশ (OQS) Ϟσϧ࣍ͷΑ͏ʹఆٛ͞ΕΔ (Agresti [1], p.429)ɿ
pij = αui β uj ψij
(i = 1, . . . , r; j = 1, . . . , r),
ͨͩ͠
ψij = ψji .
OQS Ϟσϧ QS Ϟσϧͷಛผͳ߹Ͱ͋Δɽ
f Λ 2 ֊ඍՄೳͳڱٛತؔɼF Λ f ͷ 1 ࣍ಋؔͱ͢Δɽf -μΠόʔδΣϯεʹ
ͮ͘ج४ରশ (QS[f ]) Ϟσϧ࣍ͷΑ͏ʹఆٛ͞ΕΔ (Kateri and Papaioannou [6])ɿ
pij = pSij F −1 (αi + γij )
(i = 1, . . . , r; j = 1, . . . , r),
ͨͩ͠ɼ
pSij =
pij + pji
,
2
γij = γji .
ಛʹɼf (x) = xlogxɼx > 0ɼͱͨ͠ QS[f ] Ϟσϧ QS ϞσϧͰ͋Δɽ·ͨɼf (x) = (1−
x)2 ͱͨ͠ QS[f ] Ϟσϧ Pearsonian QS ϞσϧͱݺΕΔ (Kateri and Papaioannou
[6])ɽ
Kateri and Papaioannou [6] ࣍ͷఆཧΛࣔͨ͠ɿ
ఆཧ 2ɽS Ϟσϧ͕ΓཱͭͨΊͷඞཁे݅ɼQS[f ] Ϟσϧͱ MH Ϟσϧͷ྆
ํ͕Γཱͭ͜ͱͰ͋Δɽ
f -μΠόʔδΣϯεʹॱͮ͘جং४ରশ (OQS[f ]) Ϟσϧ࣍ͷΑ͏ʹఆٛ͞ΕΔ
(Kateri and Agresti [5])ɿ
pij = pSij F −1 (αui + γij )
(i = 1, . . . , r; j = 1, . . . , r),
ͨͩ͠ɼ
pij + pji
, γij = γji .
2
OQS[f ] Ϟσϧ QS[f ] Ϟσϧͷಛผͳ߹Ͱ͋Δɽಛʹɼf (x) = xlogxɼx > 0ɼͱ͠
ͨ OQS[f ] Ϟσϧ OQS ϞσϧͰ͋Δɽ·ͨɼf (x) = (1 − x)2 ͱͨ͠ OQS[f ] Ϟσϧ
Pearsonian OQS ϞσϧͱݺΕΔ (Kateri and Agresti [5])ɽ
Kateri and Agresti [5] ࣍ͷఆཧΛࣔͨ͠ɿ
pSij =
ఆཧ 3ɽS Ϟσϧ͕ΓཱͭͨΊͷඞཁे݅ɼOQS[f ] Ϟσϧͱ MH Ϟσϧͷ
྆ํ͕Γཱͭ͜ͱͰ͋Δɽ
S Ϟσϧ੍ͷ͍ڧϞσϧͰ͋ΔͨΊɼ࣮ࡍͷσʔλղੳʹ͓͍ͯద߹͕ѱ
͍͜ͱ͕ଟ͍ɽຊͰڀݚɼS ϞσϧΛɼΑΓऑ੍͍Λ͍͔ͭͭ͘ͷϞσϧʹ͚
ΔɽͦͷΑ͏ͳ S ϞσϧͷղɼS Ϟσϧͷσʔλʹର͢Δͯ·Γ͕ѱ͍ͱ͖ɼ
ͦͷݪҼΛߟ͑Δ্Ͱ༗༻Ͱ͋Δɽ
ද 1 ʹ r ʷ r දʹద༻֤ͨ͠Ϟσϧͷద߹ݕఆͷͨΊͷൺΧΠೋݕఆ౷ྔܭ
ͷࣗ༝Λ͢هɽද 1 ΑΓɼOQS[f ] Ϟσϧͱ MH Ϟσϧͷࣗ༝ͷ S Ϟσϧͷࣗ
༝ΑΓେ͖͍ɽ͜͜ʹɼࣗ༝ r ʷ r දʹ͓͚Δ֤Ϟσϧͷ੍ʹ͍͜͠ͱ
ʹҙ͢ΔɽΑͬͯɼOQS[f ] Ϟσϧͱ MH Ϟσϧ͕ಉ࣌ʹΓཱͭߏ S Ϟσϧͷ
ࣔ͢ߏΑΓ੍͕͍͑ͱ͍ڧΔɽ
ຊઅͰɼϞσϧͷ੍Λߟྀͨ͠ S ϞσϧͷղΛ༩͑Δɽ
ද 1. r ʷ r දʹద༻֤ͨ͠Ϟσϧͷద߹ݕఆͷͨΊͷൺΧΠೋ౷ྔܭͷࣗ
༝
Ϟσϧ
S
OQS[f ]
MH
ࣗ༝
r(r − 1)/2
r(r − 1)/2 − 1
r−1
2. Ϟσϧͷղ
2.1. ରশੑͷղ
ɹߦͱྻͷείΞͷฏۉҰக (ME) ߏΛߟ͑Δɿ
µ1 = µ2
ͨͩ͠
µ1 =
r
X
ui pi· ,
µ2 =
i=1
r
X
ui p·i .
i=1
͜ͷͱ͖ɼ࣍ͷఆཧΛಘΔɽ
ఆཧ 4ɽS Ϟσϧ͕ΓཱͭͨΊͷඞཁे݅ɼOQS[f ] Ϟσϧͱ ME Ϟσϧͷ
྆ํ͕Γཱͭ͜ͱͰ͋Δɽ
ಛʹ f (x) = xlogxɼx > 0ɼͱͨ͠ʢ͢ͳΘͪ OQS[f ] Ϟσϧ͕ OQS ϞσϧͱͳΔͱ
͖ͷʣఆཧ 4 Tahata, Yamamoto and Tomizawa [8] ʹΑͬͯ༩͑ΒΕ͍ͯΔɽ
2.2. Ԡ༻ྫ
ɹද 2 ࿈ଓ͢Δ 2 ͷ༽ͷग़ੜʹؔ͢ΔσʔλͰɼॱংΧςΰϦ 4 ʷ 4 ׂදͰ͋
Δ (Tallis [9])ɽ
ද 3 ɼද 2 ͷσʔλʹద༻֤ͨ͠Ϟσϧʹର͢Δద߹ΧΠೋ౷ྔܭͷΛࣔ͢ɽ
ද 2. ࿈ଓ͢Δ 2 ͷ༽ͷग़ੜʹͮ͘جσʔλ (Tallis [9])
1952
1953 0
1
2 ܭ
0
58 52 1 111
1
26 58 3 87
2
8 12 9 29
ܭ
92 122 13 227
ද 3. ද 2 ͷσʔλʹରͯ͠ద༻֤ͨ͠Ϟσϧʹର͢ΔൺΧΠೋ౷ ྔܭG2
Ϟσϧ
S
OQS
Pearsonian OQS
ME
QS
Pearsonian QS
MH
ࣗ༝
3
2
2
1
1
1
2
G2
20.81*
20.74*
20.75*
0.07
1.35
2.16
18.65*
*ҹ 5% ༗ҙΛࣔ͢
ද 3 ΑΓɼද 2 ͷσʔλʹରͯ͠ S Ϟσϧͷద߹ѱ͘ɼOQS Ϟσϧʢ͋Δ͍
Pearsonian OQS Ϟσϧʣͷద߹ѱ͍ɽ͔͠͠ɼME Ϟσϧͷద߹ඇৗʹྑ͍ɽ
ఆཧ 4 ΑΓɼME ϞσϧΑΓ OQS Ϟσϧʢ͋Δ͍ Pearsonian OQS Ϟσϧʣͷࣔ͢
֬ߏ่͕Ε͍ͯΔ͜ͱ͕ɼS Ϟσϧͷద߹ͷѱ͍ݪҼͰ͋ΔͱਪଌͰ͖Δɽ
3. Ϟσϧͷަੑ
ɹϞσϧ M ͷద߹Λݕఆ͢ΔͨΊͷൺΧΠೋ౷ྔܭΛ G2 (M ) ͱ͢Δɽఆཧ 1
ʹରͯ͠ɼTomizawa and Tahata [10] ݕఆ౷ؔ͢ʹྔܭΔ࣍ͷఆཧΛ༩͑ͨɿ
ఆཧ 5ɽG2 (S) ɼG2 (QS) ͱ G2 (M H) ͷʹۙతʹಉͰ͋Δɽ
Ұൠʹɼ
ʮϞσϧ M3 ͕ΓཱͭͨΊͷඞཁे݅ɼϞσϧ M1 ͱϞσϧ M2 ͷ྆
ํ͕Γཱͭ͜ͱͰ͋Δʯͱ͢ΔɽG2 (M3 ) ͕ G2 (M1 ) ͱ G2 (M2 ) ͷʹۙతʹಉ
ͷͱ͖ɼ༗ҙਫ४ α ͰɼϞσϧ M1 ͱϞσϧ M2 ͕ͦΕͧΕߴ͍֬Ͱ࠾͞ΕΔͳΒ
ɼϞσϧ M3 ࠾͞ΕΔʹ͋ΔɽҰํͰɼG2 (M3 ) ͕ G2 (M1 ) ͱ G2 (M2 ) ͷʹ
ۙతʹಉͰͳ͍ͱ͖ɼϞσϧ M1 ͱϞσϧ M2 ͕ͦΕͧΕߴ͍֬Ͱ࠾͞ΕΔʹ
ؔΘΒͣɼϞσϧ M3 ͕غ٫͞ΕΔͱ͍͏ໃ६ͨ͠ঢ়͜ى͕گΓ͏Δ (Aitchison [2])ɽ
ຊͰڀݚɼ࣍ͷఆཧΛಘΔɽ
ఆཧ 6ɽS ϞσϧͷԼͰɼG2 (S) ɼG2 (QS[f ]) ͱ G2 (M H) ͷʹۙతʹಉͰ
͋Δɽ
ఆཧ 7ɽS ϞσϧͷԼͰɼG2 (S) ɼG2 (OQS[f ]) ͱ G2 (M E) ͷʹۙతʹಉͰ
͋Δɽ
ఆཧ 6 ͱఆཧ 7 ͔Βɼఆཧ 2 ͱఆཧ 4 Ͱ༩͑ΒΕΔϞσϧͷղʹ͓͍ͯɼ্هͷ
Α͏ͳໃ६ͨ͠ঢ়گ͜ىΓʹ͍͘ͱ͍͑Δɽ
ࢀߟจݙ
[1] Agresti, A. (2002). Categorical Data Analysis, 2nd edition. Wiley, New York.
[2] Aitchison, J. (1962). Large-sample restricted parametric tests. Journal of the Royal
Statistical Society, Series B, 24, 234-250.
[3] Bowker, A. H. (1948). A test for symmetry in contingency tables. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 43, 572-574.
[4] Caussinus, H. (1965). Contribution `a l’analyse statistique des tableaux de corr´elation.
Annales de la Facult´e des Sciences de l’Universit´e de Toulouse, 29, 77-182.
[5] Kateri, M. and Agresti, A. (2007). A class of ordinal quasi-symmetry models for square
contingency tables. Statistics and Probability Letters, 77, 598-603.
[6] Kateri, M. and Papaioannou, T. (1997). Asymmetry models for contingency tables.
Journal of the American Statistical Association, 92, 1124-1131.
[7] Stuart, A. (1955). A test for homogeneity of the marginal distributions in a two-way
classification. Biometrika, 42, 412-416.
[8] Tahata, K., Yamamoto, H. and Tomizawa, S. (2008). Orthogonality of decompositions
of symmetry into extended symmetry and marginal equimoment for multi-way tables
with ordered categories. Austrian Journal of Statistics, 37, 185-194.
[9] Tallis, G. M. (1962). The maximum likelihood estimation of correlation from contingency
tables. Biometrics, 18, 342-353.
[10] Tomizawa, S. and Tahata, K. (2007). The analysis of symmetry and asymmetry: Orthogonality of decomposition of symmetry into quasi-symmetry and marginal symmetry
for multi-way tables. Journal de la Soci´et´e Fran¸caise de Statistique, 148, 3-36.
© Copyright 2026 ExpyDoc