参考文献 - Minds

『診療ガイドライン作成マニュアル』
Ver.1.1（2014.07.23）
参考文献
参考文献
- 217 Copyright(c) All rights reserved by Minds, Japan Council for Quality Health Care
『診療ガイドライン作成マニュアル』
Ver.1.1（2014.07.23）
参考文献
１章
Institute of Medicine (IOM). 2011. Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust. Edited
by Robin Graham, Michelle Mancher, Dianne Miller Wolman, Sheldon Greenfield,
and Earl Steinberg. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
２章
AGREE Next Steps Consortium (2009). The AGREE Ⅱ
Instrument [Electronic
version]Retrieved February 28, 2013, from http://www.agreetrust.org
ICMJE. Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals:
Writing
and
Editing
for
Biomedical
Publication.
available
from
http://www.icmje.org/ (2013.2.28accessed)
厚生労働省.厚生労働科学研究における利益相反の管理に関する指針.2008. available from
http://www.mhlw.go.jp/seisakunitsuite/bunya/hokabunya/kenkyujigyou/ikenkyu/index.htmlorg/ (2013.2.28accessed)
Institute of Medicine (IOM). Conflict of Interest in Medical Research, Education, and
Practice. Washington, D. C.: National Academies Press; 2009.
日本医学会.医学研究の COI マネージメントに関するガイドライン.2011
G-I-N PUBLIC .G-I-N PUBLIC Toolkit: Patient and Public Involvement in
Guidelines.2012. available from http://www.g-i-n.net/activities/gin-public/toolkit
(2013.2.28 accessed)
３章
相原守夫他．診療ガイドラインのための GRADE システム‐治療介入‐
４章
[No authors listed]: Systematic review of the benzodiazepines. Guidelines for data sheets
on diazepam, chlordiazepoxide, medazepam, clorazepate, lorazepam, oxazepam,
temazepam, triazolam, nitrazepam, and flurazepam. Committee on the Review of
Medicines. Br Med J 1980;280:910-2. PMID: 7388368
Ades AE, Lu G, Higgins JP: The interpretation of random-effects meta-analysis in
decision models. Med Decis Making 2005;25:646-54. PMID: 16282215
Altman DG: Confidence intervals for the number needed to treat. BMJ 1998;317:130912. PMID: 9804726
Altman DG, Andersen PK: Calculating the number needed to treat for trials where the
outcome is time to an event. BMJ 1999;319:1492-5. PMID: 10582940
Balshem H, Helfand M, Schünemann HJ et al.: GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality
of evidence. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2011: 64(4): 401-406.
- 218 Copyright(c) All rights reserved by Minds, Japan Council for Quality Health Care
『診療ガイドライン作成マニュアル』
Ver.1.1（2014.07.23）
参考文献
Bowden J, Tierney JF, Copas AJ, Burdett S: Quantifying, displaying and accounting for
heterogeneity in the meta-analysis of RCTs using standard and generalised Q
statistics. BMC Med Res Methodol 2011;11:41. PMID: 21473747
Chalmers, T. C., P. Celano, H. S. Sacks, and H. Smith Jr.. Bias in treatment assignment
in controlled clinical trials. N Eng J of Med 1983:309(22):1358–61.
Cumming G: Understanding the new statistics: effect sizes, confidence intervals, and
meta-analysis. 2012, Taylor & Francis Group, New York, NY, USA.
Eysenck HJ: Meta-analysis of best-evidence synthesis? J Eval Clin Pract 1995;1:29-36.
PMID: 9238555
Herbison P, Hay-Smith J, Gillespie WJ. Different methods of allocation to groups in
randomized trials are associated with different levels of bias. A metaepidemiological study. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:1070-5.
Higgins JPT, Green S eds. 2011. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of
Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration,
Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org.
Higgins JP, Thompson SG: Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med
2002;21:1539-58. PMID: 12111919
Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Spiegelhalter DJ: A re-evaluation of random-effects metaanalysis. J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc 2009;172:137-159. PMID: 19381330
Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC et al. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for
assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 2011;343:d5928.
Institute of Medicine. 2011. Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for
Systematic Reviews. Edited by Jill Eden, Laura Levit, Alfred Berg, and Sally
Morton. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
Smith ML, Glass GV: Meta-analysis of psychotherapy outcome studies. Am Psychol
1977;32:752-60. PMID: 921048
Warn DE, Thompson SG, Spiegelhalter DJ: Bayesian random effects meta-analysis of
trials with binary outcomes: methods for the absolute risk difference and relative
risk scales. Stat Med 2002;21:1601-23. PMID: 12111922
Wortman PM, Yeaton WH: Using research synthesis in medical technology assessment.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1987;3:509-22. PMID: 10285721
Viechtbauer W: Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metaphor Package. J Stat Soft
2010;36:1-48. (http://www.jstatsoft.org/v36/i03/paper )
５章
Institute of Medicine (IOM). 2011. Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust. Edited
by Robin Graham, Michelle Mancher, Dianne Miller Wolman, Sheldon Greenfield,
- 219 Copyright(c) All rights reserved by Minds, Japan Council for Quality Health Care
『診療ガイドライン作成マニュアル』
Ver.1.1（2014.07.23）
参考文献
and Earl Steinberg. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). 2011. SIGN 50: A Guideline
Developer’s Handbook. Revised Edition. Edinburgh: Scottish Intercollegiate
Guidelines Network.
６章
AGREE Next Steps Consortium. 2009. The AGREE II Instrument [Electronic version].
Retrieved February 27, 2013, from http://www.agreetrust.org.
Guidelines International Patient and Public Involvement Working Group（G-I-N
PUBLIC）. 2012. G-I-N PUBLIC Toolkit: Patient and Public Involvement in
Guidelines. Retrieved November 23, 2013. from http://www.g-i-n.net/documentstore/working-groups-documents/g-i-n-public/toolkit/toolkit-combined.pdf.
Higgins JPT, Green S eds. 2011. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of
Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration,
Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org.
Institute of Medicine (IOM). 2011a. Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust. Edited
by Robin Graham, Michelle Mancher, Dianne Miller Wolman, Sheldon Greenfield,
and Earl Steinberg. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
Institute of Medicine. 2011b. Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for
Systematic Reviews. Edited by Jill Eden, Laura Levit, Alfred Berg, and Sally
Morton. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. 2009. The PRISMA Statement for Reporting
Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies that Evaluate Health Care
Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration. PLoS Med 6(7): e1000100.
doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100.
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). 2012. The Guidelines
Manual: Process and Methods Guide. London: NICE.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. 2013. Factsheet 2: How
organizations representing patients and cares can get involved. Factsheets for
patients and cares: contributing to NICE clinical guideline. London: NICE.
Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). 2011. SIGN 50: A Guideline
Developer’s Handbook. Revised Edition. Edinburgh: Scottish Intercollegiate
Guidelines Network.
Shea BJ, Grimshaw JM, Wells GA, et al. 2007. Development of AMSTAR: a
measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC
Medical Research Methodology 7:10.
Shiffman RN, Shekelle P, Overhage JM, et al. 2003. Standardized Reporting of Clinical
- 220 Copyright(c) All rights reserved by Minds, Japan Council for Quality Health Care
『診療ガイドライン作成マニュアル』
Ver.1.1（2014.07.23）
参考文献
Practice Guidelines: A Proposal from the Conference on Guideline Standardization.
Ann Intern Med 139:493-8.
Shiffman RN, Dixon J, Brandt C, et al. 2005. The Guideline Implementability
Appraisal (GLIA): Development of an Instrument to Identify Obstacles to
Guideline Implementation. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 5(23).
World Health Organization (WHO). 2012. WHO Handbook for Guideline Development.
Geneva: World Health Organization.
７章
Alonso-Coello P, Garcia LM, Carrasco JM, et al. 2011. The Updating of Clinical Practice
Guidelines: Insights from an International Survey. Implementation Science 6: 107.
Higgins JPT, Green S eds. 2011. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of
Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration,
Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org.
Institute of Medicine (IOM). 2011. Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust. Edited
by Robin Graham, Michelle Mancher, Dianne Miller Wolman, Sheldon Greenfield,
and Earl Steinberg. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). 2012. The Guidelines
Manual: Process and Methods Guide. London: NICE.
Shekelle PG, Ortiz E, Rhodes S, et al. 2001. Validity of the Agency for Healthcare
Research and Quality Clinical Practice Guidelines: How Quickly Do Guidelines
Become Outdated? JAMA 286(12): 1461-1467.
Shojania KG, Sampson M, Ansari MT, et al. 2007. How quickly do systematic reviews
go out of date?: A survival analysis. Ann Intern Med 21;147(4):224-33.
World Health Organization (WHO). 2012. WHO Handbook for Guideline Development.
Geneva: World Health Organization.
- 221 Copyright(c) All rights reserved by Minds, Japan Council for Quality Health Care

Download Report