15° anno di fondazione del GUONE MULTIDISCIPLINARITA’ IN URO-ONCOLOGIA Aviano, 10 settembre 2010 INTEGRAZIONE TERAPIA SISTEMICA-TRATTAMENTO LOCALE PROSTATA Dr.ssa Ori Ishiwa Dr Sergio Bracarda UOC Oncologia Medica Arezzo c e tat s o r p d e ) c 0 n M a , v 1 d a x y N l l , a 4 c T o L (T 3 r e c an Patients affected by locally advanced prostate cancer present an high risk of relapse or death after exclusive local treatment, especially if: D’Amico JCO 2002 - Clinical stage T3 - PSA > 20 ng/ml - Gleason Score 8-10 Standard Txt: - RRP - RT+ adj ADT EORTC 22863 T3-T4 o N1: RT ±3 yr OT (goserelin): (Bollà, Lancet 2002) > OS RTOG 85-31 T3-T4 o N+: RT ± OT fino a PD: (Pilepich, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005) > OS But … recent increasing evidence for harmful effects of long-term ADT ! " ? Which is the optimal duration for ADT combined with RT ? EORTC 22961, Bolla, ASCO 2007 # $%#$& %#& # $& #$' (#& )* +%,( . & ( ! &! Non-inferiority Trial "#$% 0# 2# /$ * 1" $ 1 34 #5 RESULTS: significant differences in OS between treatment arms OS !! p = 0.0191 Long Term ADT >>> Short Term ADT And in PFS any clinical progression in 20.1 vs 8.2% La Chemioterapia, come la Terapia Ormonale, è una terapia sistemica. Potrebbe avere un ruolo nella gestione della malattia Loc-Avanzata ? No, nessuno …. .. tuttavia ….. …. Non ora, per lo meno…. From 2004 DCT standard CT approach in CRPC Overall. More than 1.600 met CRPC pts treated !! Treatment of Choice for CRPC since 2004: Docetaxel (>OS) TAX-327 OS = +2.5m Docetaxel 3-Weekly, significantly improves: - OS (18.9 vs 16.5 m) p =.009) (24% ↓ in the risk of death, HR=0.76, 95% CI 0.62-0.94) 45 vs. 32%, p = .0005 - PSA response: - Objective response: 12 vs 7%, p = 0.11 - Pain response: 35 vs. 22%, p = .01 - Quality of Life (FACT-P): 22 vs 13%, p = .009 - Safe but with ↑ toxicity (Grade 3/4 neutropenia: 32 vs 21.%) SWOG 99-16 OS = +2m Docetaxel 3-W plus Estramustine Ph. significantly improves: p = 0.02 - OS (17.5 vs 15.6 m) (20% ↓ in the risk of death. HR = 0.80 (95% CI, 0.67-0.97) - PSA response: 50 vs 27%, - Objective response: 17 vs 11%, - PFS: +27% (95% CI, 14 to 37%; p<0.0001 p=0.15 p<0.0001 - But also toxicity, even if without differences in toxic death rates 2007 Updated OS Analysis of TAX-327 Study Initial report with 557 of 1006 pts died. Survival updated to Jan 2007 (by contacting investigators at each site by mail, email or phone). 310 additional deaths recorded resulting in a total of 867 deaths Comparison of initial and updated OS data Median OS 2003 Data p-value Update 2007 p-value - DCT Q3w 18.9 (17.0-21.2) 0.009 19.2 (17.5-21.3) 0.004 - DCT wk 17.4 (15.7-19.0) 17.8 (16.2-19.2) - Mitox. 16.5 (14.4-18.6) 16.3 (14.3-17.9) 1.0 * 95% confidence interval indicated Docetaxel Docetaxel Mitoxantrone Q3W (n=335) Weekly (n=334) (n=337) 3-yr survival rate 17.9% 16.7% 13.7% 0.6 0.4 0.2 Survival > 3 years 0.0 Propotion Alive 0.8 Docetaxel 3-Weekly Docetaxel Weekly Mitoxantrone 0 1 2 3 4 Years 5 6 7 Questi dati sono applicabili solo all’ CRPC ? a "Proof of Principle“: evidence of docetaxel activity also in HDPC. "Effect of Docetaxel in Pts With Hormone-Dependent PSA Progression After Local Therapy for Prostate Cancer" Goodin, et Al. JCO 2005 25 pts with PSA relapse after RP (14), RT (6), RP+RT (5) - Median baseline PSA 31.5 (2.2 – 160.6) - Median Gleason Score 7 (6-9) PSA response in 10/23 ev. pts (43%) PSA nadir ≥ 5m - Testosterone level: not affected (Docetaxel plus Pdn active in HDPC and not influencing the hormonal status) (not affecting eventual HT) ......... Local therapy Hormonal therapy Chemotherapy Local therapy ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY Hormonal therapy Chemotherapy “Adjuvant” Chemotherapy Trials • Only 1 modern randomized trial • Of 93 patients enrolled, only 38 had T3/T4 disease • No radiotherapy administered! • Randomized to leuprolide vs leuprolide + mitoxantrone x 4 cycles (not an actual standard) Wang BJU Int 2000 '" ( ) * +# , P=0.044 Wang BJU Int 2000 SWOG 9921: HT vs HT+CT after RP Adjuvant CT trials ongoing or closed (n = 1360) High Risk after RP R A N D O M I Z E Hormonal therapy x 2 yr Hormonal therapy x 2 yrs Mitoxantrone + Prednisone x 6 cycles TAX- 3501 (2.172 pts) Primary Endpoint: OS RP R a n d o m i z a t i o n P r o g Observation r e s s i o n ADT ADT+Taxotere ADT – LH-RH x 18 mos Taxotere- 75mg/m2 q.3wks x 6 cycles ADT ADT + Taxotere 2nd Pr og re ss io n P r o g r e s s i o n NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY Local therapy ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY Hormonal therapy Chemotherapy Why Neoadjuvant Therapy? • • • • Well characterized high risk groups Ability to assess in vivo chemosensitivity Early treatment of micrometastases Ability to assess molecular determinants of response in pathologic specimens • Rapid ability to assess effect of new agents compared with adjuvant trials Neoadjuvant Docetaxel Prior To Radical Prostatectomy • Phase II trial • Up to 6 months of weekly docetaxel prior to RP in high risk localized prostate cancer • Monthly PSA, DRE assessments • Endorectal coil MRI at 0, 2, and 6 months • Primary endpoint: Pathologic CR Febbo Clin Cancer Res 2005 Clinical Response • • PSA decline – > 50% in 11/19 (58%) Measurable tumor response by erMRI – > 25% in 13/19 (68%) Toxicity • • • • • Overall well tolerated Most common side effect: grade 1-2 fatigue No neutropenia or thrombocytopenia No serious N/V, neuropathy, diarrhea, infection Unusual side effects: nail changes, excess tearing Pathology Results (N=16) Pathologic Stage pT0 pT2 pT3a pT3b pT4 N (+) # Patients (%) 0 6 (38%) 2 (13%) 7 (44%) 1 (6%) 0 Neoadjuvant CT trials ongoing CALGB 90203: Neoadjuvant CT In High Risk Prostate Cancer (n = 610) High Risk 40% DFS (n = 610) R A N D O M I Z E RP Docetaxel x 6 cycles Primary Endpoint: 5 yr DFS RP CONCLUSIONI • La chemioterapia sistemica precoce potrebbe essere un approccio potenzialmente vantaggioso (ritardato sviluppo di cloni CRPC). • Tale approccio, tuttavia, va ancor oggi impiegato solo nell’ambito di protocolli di ricerca clinica. La RT+HT (trattamento integrato) rimane ancor oggi lo standard terapeutico ottimale del Ca. Prostatico Loc. Avanzato
© Copyright 2024 ExpyDoc