Press review after the conference - SIS

SIS-RRI CONFERENCE
Press review
1
SUMMARY
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Ricerca e innovazione per rispondere alle sfide sociali ……………………..3
Ricerca: Moedas, coinvolgere giovani ……………………………………………….4
Scienza per e con la società a Roma …………………………………………………5
Ricerca e Innovazione per rispondere alle sfide sociali……………………….6
Follow-up after the conference…………………………………………………………..7
Italian EU Presidency issues document outlining responsible research and
innovation……………………………………………………………………………………19
7. Recherche & Innovation Responsable: version actualisée de la Déclaration
de Rome…………………………………………………………………………………………….20
2
19 November - Diregiovani.it
1. Ricerca e innovazione per rispondere alle sfide sociali
Rafforzare la cooperazione tra scienza e società per consentire un maggiore sostegno
all'innovazione è l'obiettivo della conferenza 'Scienza, innovazione e società: raggiungere
ricerca e innovazione responsabili' al via oggi a Roma presso l'auditorium Parco della Musica.
Fortemente voluto dal Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche insieme all'Agenzia per la promozione
della ricerca Europea é un evento internazionale che si concluderà il prossimo 21 novembre.
Organizzato nell'ambito del semestre di presidenza italiana del consiglio dell'Unione europea
vede la partecipazione di un pubblico vasto
proveniente dai 28 Paesi membri e associati per
lavorare tutti insieme alla ricerca e
all'innovazione responsabile, un approccio che
possa diventare - chiedono gli organizzatori centrale in tutte le politiche e le attività
collegate al mondo della ricerca, in particolare
per la creazione di un spazio europeo della
ricerca
e
dell'Unione
dell'innovazione.
Tematiche chiave della tre giorni sono l'impegno
pubblico per migliorare la comunicazione
scientifica; le pari opportunità per rimediare agli
squilibri di genere nel settore; l'educazione
scientifica per avvicinare i giovani ad un mondo
troppo spesso considerato ostile; l'accesso
aperto ai risultati della ricerca; gli aspetti etici
collegati alla società; il governo della ricerca per
raggiungere un modello condiviso. L'approccio Ricerca e innovazione responsabile è un
processo di allineamento della ricerca e dell'innovazione ai valori, alle esigenze e alle
3
aspettative della società e dunque offrire alle nuove sfide di oggi soluzioni intelligenti, inclusive
e sostenibili. "Noi partecipanti e organizzatori della conferenza - si legge nel documento
'dichiarazione di Roma su ricerca e innovazione responsabile in Europa - consideriamo nostro
dovere collettivo promuovere Ricerca e Innovazioni responsabili. Invitiamo le istituzioni
europee, gli stati membri, le organizzazioni di finanziamento e di promozione, le imprese e la
società civile a lavorare insieme per soluzioni inclusive e sostenibili alle nostre sfide sociali".
Perché - sottolineano i partecipanti - la ricerca ha il compito di servire la società.
20 November - Euractiv.it
2. Ricerca: Moedas, coinvolgere giovani
Dobbiamo aumentare i nostri sforzi per fare spazio ai giovani nel mondo della ricerca. Lo ha
detto il commissario per la Ricerca, la scienza e l’innovazione Carlos Moedas, intervenendo a
una conferenza organizzata dalla presidenza italiana del Consiglio dell'Unione, presso
l'Auditorium Parco della musica, a Roma.
L'impegno per fare spazio ai giovani, fornendo opportunità concrete a chi desidera lavorare nel
mondo della ricerca, deve accompagnarsi, secondo il commissario, agli sforzi per migliorare il
dialogo tra scienza, società e politica. "Abbiamo bisogno che le decisioni siano prese insieme ha detto Moedas - e dobbiamo assumerci la responsabilità di decisioni che si basino su
evidenze scientifiche".
Intervenendo alla prima giornata della conferenza
'Scienza, Innovazione e Società', insieme al ministro
dell’Istruzione, dell'università e della ricerca Stefania
Giannini e al presidente del Cnr Luigi Nicolais, il
commissario ha parlato anche di governance dei
processi di ricerca e innovazione, educazione,
accesso aperto ai risultati della ricerca,
coinvolgimento della società, pari opportunità e
responsabilità etica. Temi ripresi nella sessione
odierna in sei panel paralleli, anche alla luce del
contributo fornito dall'Unione attraverso il Sesto e il
Settimo programma quadro per la ricerca e
l'innovazione e, nel settennato in corso, con Horizon
2020.
4
Accanto ai dibattiti, la presidenza italiana ha previsto il lancio della mostra
Art&InnovationExhibition, che esplora le interazioni tra scienza, arte e società, e un networking
event per incentivare collaborazioni internazionali tra i soggetti del mondo scientifico. A
chiudere i lavori, domani, saranno gli interventi di Wolfgang Burtscher, vicedirettore generale
della Dg Ricerca e innovazione della Commissione europea, il viceministro per Istruzione,
università e ricerca Luigi Berlinguer, Marco Mancini, capo dipartimento presso il Miur, e Brian
Wynne, della Lancaster University (Regno Unito), alla presenza del presidente della Repubblica
Giorgio Napolitano.
27 November - Eunews.it
3. Scienza per e con la società a Roma
Politiche per la ricerca sostenibile e il passaggio epocale da una scienza nella società a una scienza con e
per la società. Se ne è parlato a Roma alla Conferenza Science, Innovation and Society: Achieving
Responsible Research and Innovation, che si è tenuta dal 19 al 21 novembre all’Auditorium Parco della
Musica e al Maxxi, organizzata dalla presidenza italiana dell’UE, con la collaborazione di Apre – Agenzia
per la Promozione della Ricerca Europea,
CNR e Roma Capitale. L’incontro puntava a
individuare politiche comuni e strategie
pubbliche europee rivolte alla promozione
del valore sociale della cultura scientifica. In
una società matura, la scienza dovrebbe
infatti avere un ruolo portante nel favorire
l’innalzamento della qualità di vita, la
riappropriazione del territorio, le pratiche di
responsabilità e di cura dell’ambiente, la
diffusione di conoscenze, la costruzione di
reti di sviluppo, l’uguaglianza di genere. Tutte
queste linee politiche presuppongono una
rilettura dell’ambiente come territorio attivo,
ovvero un luogo che svolge un ruolo di
mediazione simbolica, cognitiva e pratica fra
la materialità dei posti e l’agire sociale delle persone che li abitano. Alla base della conferenza c’era la
5
certezza che la ricerca scientifica debba essere parte integrante delle politiche culturali delle città
d’Europa e che, in una società complessa come l’attuale, la conoscenza sia uno strumento necessario
per una democrazia che sia davvero compiuta. Questi principi sono alla base di Horizon 2020,
l’ambizioso programma di ricerca dell’Unione Europea, al quale la conferenza era strettamente
collegata. Durante la tre giorni sono stati anche presentati i risultati dei numerosi progetti di ricerca
vincitori dei bandi UE degli anni precedenti. Nella prima giornata, giovedì al Maxxi Base, la Sapienza e
l’Osservatorio Scienza per la Società, in collaborazione con Roma Capitale e con il II Municipio hanno
indetto l’incontro Science with and for Society in Rome, nel quale si è discusso del rapporto tra scienza e
società e nella capitale. L’università aveva un suo spazio espositivo nella giornata del Maxxi, dove ha
presentato una serie di preziosi reperti antichi e moderni provenienti dai musei riuniti nel suo Polo
Museale. All’evento principale dell’Auditorium, Science and Innovation for Society, si è avuta invece una
tre giorni di tavole rotonde, workshop e dibattiti sulle modalità in cui la scienza può migliorare la società
contemporanea. Come ha detto Giorgio Parisi, ordinario di fisica nella prima università romana, nella
giornata inaugurale della conferenza al Maxxi Base, “se non siamo capaci di comunicare la scienza,
decresce la capacità scientifica del paese”.
27 November - FirstAster.it
4. Ricerca e Innovazione per rispondere alle sfide sociali
Fortemente voluto dal CNR insieme all'Apre l’evento
internazionale organizzato nell'ambito del semestre di
presidenza italiana del consiglio dell'Unione europea ha visto
la partecipazione di un pubblico vasto proveniente dai 28
Paesi membri e associati per lavorare tutti insieme alla
ricerca e all'innovazione responsabile: approccio che possa
diventare centrale in tutte le politiche e le attività collegate al
mondo della ricerca, in particolare per la creazione di un
Spazio europeo della ricerca e dell'Unione dell'innovazione.
6
Tematiche chiave della tre giorni sono state l’accesso aperto per migliorare l'accessibilità e
l'utilizzo dei risultati della ricerca finanziata tramite risorse pubbliche; le pari opportunità per
rimediare agli squilibri di genere nel settore; l'educazione scientifica per avvicinare i giovani ad
un mondo troppo spesso considerato ostile; gli aspetti etici collegati alla società; il governo
della ricerca per raggiungere un modello condiviso. La Conferenza SIS-RRI ha esplorato tutte
queste tematiche alla luce del ruolo svolto dall’Unione europea con i precedenti Programmi
Quadro (6°PQ e 7°PQ) e l’attuale Programma Horizon 2020. L’ultimo giorno della conferenza è
stata presentata la Dichiarazione di Roma che ricorda come oggi siano mature le condizioni per
chiedere una nuova forma di RRI che sostenga la ricerca europea e lo sforzo dell’innovazione;
un invito quindi rivolto a tutti gli attori a lavorare insieme per soluzioni inclusive e sostenibili
alle nostre sfide sociali.
N°92 Special Edition, November 2014 – Caos Management.it
5. Follow-up after the conference
“The SIS-RRI Conference takes place in one of the most suggestive Rome’s convention center:
the Auditorium Parco della Musica”.
In this way the venue for the Conference was presented in the website. I think none of the
participants was disappointed, on the contrary, Rome was generous enough to receive the
Conference with a beautiful and sunny
weather so it was really easy to appreciate
the beauty of the Auditorium of Renzo
Piano. We can say it loud: It was a
success!!!
And we are very proud and happy. Saying
this, of course, doesn't mean that
everything was done, perfectly realized
7
and achieved, but I think that on the whole we can look at it as a success.
We are talking about nearly 600 persons gathered in a chaotic and messy and beautiful city as
Rome is, most of the people coming from the European scientific, research and innovation
community and alike, having the opportunity to meet, discuss, point out to what are the most
important subjects in this field but moreover with the ambitious of elaborate an effective
instrument for the European Commission to be used to plan future RRI framework actions and
objectives. As we could read from the press release document: “at the presence of a large
public coming from the 28 Member States and from the 11 Associated Countries, the event will
put the spotlight on a platform that allow societal actors to work together during the whole
research and innovation process in order to better align both the process and its outcomes, with
the values, needs and expectations of European society. This is what Responsible Research and
Innovation (RRI) means.”
In fact a concluding document was delivered at the closing of the Conference, the Rome
Declaration, and as Prof. Riccardo Pozzo presenting it to all, said, you can see the
corrections and amendments as result of the work done by the different groups that
participated to the Conference.
I can only add that probably there wasn't enough time for the participants to have the
opportunity to vote democratically the conclusions that every single session had
reached, because I can remind you that the issues in question were quite complex:

prompting new governance strategies for science and scientific institutions;

fostering Research Integrity in Europe;
defining new tools for understanding society, forecasting changes and ameliorating
the exchange between science and society.

And every issue was going to be discuss throughout the six following Key Areas:
Public Engagement: of all societal actors - researchers, medias, policy-makers and civil
society – and their joint participation in the research and innovation process, in
accordance with the value of inclusiveness.
8
Gender Equality: the second key is Gender Equality. Engagement means that all actors women and men – are on board. The under representation of women must be
addressed.
Science Education: there is an urgent need to boost the interest of children and youth in
science and technology, so they can become the researchers of tomorrow and
contribute to a science-literate society.
Open Access: our fourth key is to make Open Access a reality. This means giving free
access to the results of publicly-funded research.
Ethics: European society is based on shared values. In order to adequately respond to
societal challenges, research and innovation must respect fundamental rights and the
highest ethical standards.
Governance: through this key, the aim is to develop shared and harmonious models of
governance for Responsible Research and Innovation that integrate all the actors
(researchers, policy-makers, industry and civil society).
Having this in mind, and also considering that everything can be improved and that we
are talking about not only improving but also about evaluating, measuring, and
considering the real needs of the society in a responsible way we can simply know there
is still a long way to go. It would have been impossible to talk to every speaker of every
session, so what I am reporting now is only the impressions of some of the people that
took part in the Conference under different roles; people I had the opportunity to
speak to, some in the corridors when going from one session to another, others in the
magnificent Italian buffet served at dinner/coffee break/lunch time, in other words,
when it was possible.
9
Professor Alan Winfield, BSc PhD Ceng MIET MIEEE MloD, from Bristol
Robotics Laboratory, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK, Speaker in the
session: Open Science
Winfield spoke about three levels of Open Science that we can summarise as a “very
open science approach”. He underlined the importance of social media in supporting
open science, and here he includes a website, blog, Facebook, LinkedIn, and so on;
indeed anything that can be useful for a project. He also advocates the use of rich virtual
environments for processes of social learning and innovation - deeply engaging all
stakeholders in the scientific process.
At the same time he considers responsible research absolutely fundamental, and
declared
that “if
science
is
not
open
it
is
immoral”.
This declaration was mentioned at the closing of the Conference by Prof. Carla Basili as
a very clear statement of what all the participants had been talking about and how we
should look at science in the future. As for himself, Dr. Winfield told me he was
delighted to have attended the Conference and considered it worthwhile and enriching.
I must say that in the Open Science session there were many things that
should be mentioned as the long and colourful Professor Roger Strand, from the
University of Bergen, Norway, made us noticed as chairman of the session in cochairman with Professor Carla Basili, from CNR Ceris Institute, currently responsible of
the research line: Knowledge Circulation and Scientific Information Policies.
10
Opening the session, Carla Basili reported the preliminary results of the
Stocktaking Study to be released as a follow-up of the conference by the Local Scientific
Committee, explaining the move from Open Access to Open Science, particularly with a
focus on the current economic context and on how it requires the scientific research to
move beyond the academic boundaries to meet social and economic demands, the core
of the RRI goal.
Cameron Neylon, Advocacy Director of PLOS, Cambridge, UK, said that is
necessary to engage with people at frank, and he pointed out that “open is not about
sharing, open is about listening” and affects communications, information and equity.
While Bernd Pulverer, from the EMBO Journal, Germany, said that the
main reasons to publish are to preserve, share and mark achievements in academic
environment, but now is “publish or perish”, taking also in account that are papers with
more authors than readers.
11
Instead, Alma Swan, SPARC Europe, UK, stressed an interesting point
having the opportunity to discuss it also with somebody from the European Commission
present in the audience. Her point was that about the projects that had been realized
and finished we really haven't got much information, because there are no monitoring
procedures in place, and there is a real need of changing the culture in this area.
Professor Guido Van Steendam, KULeuven, Antwerp Area,
Belgium. “Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) is the on-going process on
aligning research and innovation to the values, needs and expectations of society". This
is how it was corrected in the Declaration of Rome after all the works. Professor Van
Steendam, being present in this world since 1992, was afraid (I interviewed him the
second day) that there was too much promotion and propaganda. He said that the real
problem is how can we guide society to link it to technology. Society is always trying to
define itself. Up to then, he thought it seemed to him a going back to the old idea,
science in society.
Mr. drs. Jan Staman, Directeur Rathenau Instituut, Utrecht, Netherland,
enthusiastically told me that he was very happy to be in the Conference, because to
attend this meeting with these atmosphere is very good, he felt that there was plenty of
energy. Going on talking he said he felt, though, is time to stop talking because we know
what we are, but is time to do something. He thinks there is the need of a solid next
step for the future and here, he suggested, “we need another audience formed also by
12
entrepreneurs, people from the real world”. He feels the urgency to go forward.
Dr.Javier Gómez Díez, Secretario del Foro Hispanoamericano Francisco
de Vitoria y profesor del Departamento de Formación Humanística, Universidad
Francisco de Vitoria, Madrid, Spain. For Prof. Gómez was his first time in one of these
meetings and he said it was a very good opportunity to get in touch with people, even if
at risk of becoming “a meet market”. Him being from a catholic and private university, I
had to ask him how they look at the relationship between science and society. He said
that at his university he assists people coming from all kind of religions and what they
have very clear is something to be studied profoundly, the consciousness of people,
moreover the consciousness of the ones that are different to us. Furthermore, as a
university, they are quite advanced in biology with special care towards cancer and
nourishment. Coming from Chile, I felt also obliged to ask him about the relationship
with the South American countries that once were the Spanish colonies. He replied that
it was really a long time ago, and looking at the present, he could speak about two or
three EU Community. The most strong one composed by those countries that are
economically better of like Germany, Great Britain, France, The Netherlands and with a
second community where we could position Italy, Spain itself, Greece and so on. He said
he
hopes and believes in
a
very rich
and plural Community.
Dott. Luciano Massetti, Researcher at CNR-IBIMET, Florence Italy. He
participated to the Market Place on Friday morning and was very satisfied. At first, he
thought the situation was not so good because his expectations on the market were
very high. But, I think, speaking to us, he realized himself that in reality it has gone very
well because the contacts they made were of a very high quality, 50% from Italy and the
13
other half from Belgium, Netherlands, UK, but all of them with a real interest they hope
to develop.
Dr. Roberta Schaller-Steidl, Gender and Diversity Management, Vienna
Dr. Fiorella Battaglia, wissenschaftliche Assistentin, Ludwig Maximilians
Universität Münche, Monaco were both of them quite busy with their lunch until I
interrupted and asked them what their impressions were. We begun talking generally
about the Conference, and then we went on speaking about the “Gender Equality” area.
Both of them agreed that after what seemed to be a lower profile starting point, as the
time went by, they realized it was considered by many people and not only the women
present at the Conference, a subject that can no longer be postponed or treated as a
less important area, as was stressed quite well byRossella Palomba (CNR-Italy) in a
plenary session.
Prof. Paolo Manzelli, President of EGOCREANET, c/o Incubator of the
University in Florence, expressed his idea about Responsible Research. He has a very
clear idea because he has been of this idea for quite a long time, in advantage to many
people; he said that Responsible Research has to go forward, with collaboration
leaving behind competitiveness. He thinks that in the future Research and Innovation
must respond to the needs and the growing ambitions of the knowledge society, that
overcome the reductionist mechanical paradigm and values the obsolete industrial
14
society
in
order
to
be
more
responsible
and
conscious.
Go Yoshizawa, Ph.D., Associate Professor, Depart. Of Biomedical Ethics
and Public Policy, Osaka University, Japan, and Hirakawa, Hideyuki, Ph.D., Professor
Osaka University Center for the Study of Communication-Design (CSCD). Talking to them
I noticed they were surprised to discover lots of similarities with research
problems, concepts of society, and so on. But, they pointed out, a Conference like this
one in their country would have been attended only by people from one technical
speciality, even from one brunch of the scientific community which under my point of
view, is a sign of hierarchical impoverishment. Just because I had to, I asked them what
about Fukushima, how they live it now. They said that even if they live far away, they all
know that because already 4 years have passed by they should seriously do something
about it.
Dr. Charly Ryan, Senior Lecturer in Education, Education, Health and
Social Care, The University of Winchester, UK, speaker in the Formal and Non-Formal
Science Education. A very affable and gentle person who said that he was really very
happy to be there, that he had met lots of interesting people. He also told me he
thinks the Commission has a big job to do towards the public. Most people, in his
experience, don't know that they are expected to be part of the Open Science. They
have conducted a survey in England interviewing more than two thousand people for
two hours for each of them and have found that a 5 % of them were not able to make
any type of comment with reference to science and society. Something to reflect
15
seriously.
Ing. Giuseppe Monti, IMC Integral Management Consultancy GmbH,
Director of Il Caos Management, declared that under his point of view he has attended a
Conference with a very high level, extremely interesting topics that affect both globally
and at European level and could do nothing but good for the development of science,
technology, innovation, for a better society.
Dott.ssa Diassina Di Maggio, Director, Agenzia per la Promozione della
Ricerca Europea APRE. I talked to the APRE's Director during the closing of the
Conference, in the beautiful major room of the Auditorium. At that point we were
already aware of the huge quantity of work it has been done in these three days with
people interchanging ideas, discussing about different positions ethically and
scientifically about the main areas the Conference intended to explore. So she admitted
that when they started this adventure there were problems of budget, and they thought
it was a big challenge. Now she can said it has been a big success and we have all being
testimonial of the great commitment of all the participants to understand what the
society needs, a great need of communication between science and society.
16
Prof. Luigi Nicolais, President of National Research Council (CNR), Italy.
He was delighted to be able to attend after some difficulties on the first day, and is hard
to make a summary: All research is scientifically valid, every single researcher,
regardless of whether it is engaged in a mission- oriented or curiosity-driven, is a source
of energy supplying new connections between ideas and provides knowledge that
sooner or later someone, following unpredictable paths, will find a way to use it. In
order to imagine and build a better future than the one we seem confined by the
current conservative and warm views, it becomes urgent to mobilize extraordinary
talent of culture, science, technology, research and innovation, which is associated with
a conviction and widespread adoption of changes, important and profound in all sectors
of society, particularly in the way we think, act, produce and consume. ...it would be
desirable, along with a new-found social role of scientists, to invest in a continuing
and recurrent education, for young people and adults, countering the excesses in all
areas of scientific illiteracy and carelessness, new forms of exclusion that can have a
very serious impact in the present and future lives of every single person and of the
community as a whole.
Mr. Wolfgang Burtscher – Deputy Director General DG Research and
Innovation, Belgium. It was an honor to ask directly Mr. Burtscher his impressions of the
Conference. And he said that who else could have been better to explain the RRI to
society than the people that was present in Rome. In that regard he gave his sincere
17
congratulations and thanks to the Italian Government and its Presidency because is
important to look into Europe. Innovation doesn't divide European countries, on the
contrary is a challenge for Europe to address the innovation in the best way possible. He
continued saying that of course, we cannot resolve all the problems of the world but
research and innovation are crucial for the future and there is a real concern that
society is changing too quickly and therefore research and innovation have to approach
the matter together following the same policies.
As said beforehand, there is a lot to be done, a long way to go yet, but we can say that
the Conference in Rome was a great success and we hope to see the development and
achievements in the future in order to develop the multi-actorial responsible approach
based on the trans-disciplinary and interactive innovation to sharing transformation
research to all over the world.
18
25 November - Eurekanetwork.org
6. Italian EU Presidency issues document outlining responsible research and
innovation
From 19 to 21 November, a large conference was held in Rome to discuss the relation between
research and society in the frame of the Italian EU Presidency. The result of this debate is ‘the
Rome Declaration’: a document supporting a more ‘responsible’ research and innovation. The
declaration directly refers to the 2009 Lund declaration, which outlined societal challenges to
be met by European researchers. The Lund declaration had a considerable impact in the
definition of the priorities of funding instruments developed under Horizon 2020, the EU’s €80
billion flagship research programme.
Similarly, the Rome declaration could
influence the definition of future EU funding
and support programmes, by promoting
collaborations between various societal
actors - researchers, industry, policymakers
and civil society, supporting more gender
equality in research institutions, calling for a
boost in younger generations interest in
technology and making research results
more easily available. But the main novelty in
the Rome declaration might be the
introduction of ‘ethics’ to the definition of
research schemes: the document stresses
that ‘policymakers have a responsibility to prevent harmful or unethical developments in
research and innovation.’
Responsible innovation has been historically one of the cornerstones of the EUREKA initiative.
Created as a response to increased technological capacity developed outside European borders
in the field of defence, EUREKA projects remain since their launch in 1985 exclusively limited to
civilian purpose.
19
27 November - www.horizon2020.gouv.fr
7. Recherche & Innovation Responsable : version actualisée de la
Déclaration de Rome
La Déclaration de Rome, un document rassemblant des conclusions et recommandations sur la
notion de Recherche et d’Innovation Responsable (R.R.I.) a été élaborée dans le cadre de la
conférence "S.I.S.-R.R.I. : Science, innovation et société", qui s’est tenue à Rome du 19 au 21
novembre 2014, sous la présidence italienne du Conseil de l’Union.
La notion de R.R.I. implique l’intégration et
l’engagement des acteurs sociétaux dans les
processus de recherche et de développement, grâce
notamment à des approches participatives et
inclusives.
La R.R.I. a été au cœur de la conférence : notamment
à travers une réflexion et un dialogue autour de
l’évolution des politiques de l’Union européenne
(U.E.) liées à la R.R.I., ainsi que l’évolution des
activités liées également à cette notion et financées
par l’U.E. dans le cadre des deux précédents
programmes-cadre pour la recherche et le
développement technologique.
La Déclaration de Rome a pour finalité de servir d’outil pour la Commission européenne dans
l’élaboration des objectifs, politiques et programmes futurs en relation avec la R.R.I.,
notamment à travers la proposition d’une série d’actions à développer.
Une première version du document a été délivrée en introduction de la conférence. Une
version modifiée, prenant en compte les différentes réflexions menées lors de la conférence,
est à présent disponible sur le site de la conférence.
20
La Déclaration de Rome appelle les institutions européennes, les états membres, les
organismes de recherche et de financement, ainsi que le secteur privé et la société civile à faire
de la R.R.I. un objectif commun et à trouver collectivement des solutions durables et inclusives
aux défis sociétaux auxquels nous faisons face actuellement.
21

Download Report