Study Period on the Integration of MDR/MFI Scenario for the Integration of MDR&MFI 2009.08 Ad-hoc Meeting, Wuhan H. Horiuchi Balloting Comments(SC32N1857) • Approval : ６ • Approval W/ Comment: 1 (Canada) • Abstain W/ Comment: 1 (Germany) The project was Approved Current Status of SC32WG2 1997 2000 2010 2005 MFI 1,3, MFI 2,4 SC32 Formulated 3-ed2 5 6 7 8 TR MDR 3-ed.3 MDR 1,2,3,4,5,6 MDR ed.2 1,2,3,4,5,6 20944 Trends on Information Technology Information Productivity Service Oriented Model Oriented SOA Object Oriented Data Oriented BPR Office Automation SIS Process Oriented Business Computerization Initiation 1960 4 1970 Web2.0 Internet + Web Tech. System Re-construction 1980 1990 2000 2010 MARKET REQUIREMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED Market Requirements Semantic Registry Metadata Registry Sharing of Discover & Casting Web Service Sharing of knowledge Cross Domain Interoperation ROR Software Sharing of Data DD/DS Sharing of development Methodology 6 SSOA Requirements • • • • • • Ontology Discovering Cloud Discovery ROR (Registry Service Integration Architecture) On demand Selection of Cloud Semantic Interoperation Etc. BASIC NOTION OF THE INTEGRATION Expected Evolution of MDR & MFI (1) – Align the Two Families of Standards so That Common Facilities Can Be Built Common Administration Information 11179 & 19763 Metadata Registration “Common Facility” for both MDR & MFI Model Registration ISO/IEC11179 Edition 3 ISO/IEC19763 ISO/IEC11179 Edition 2 ISO/IEC11179 Edition 1 Data Elements 9 SC14 MOF (ISO/IEC19502) MOF (OMG) IRDS (ISO/IEC 10728) Expected Evolution in MFI MFI-XX: ROR MFI-6: Registration Proc MFI-XX: MM4 XXXX MFI-8: MM4Role & Goal MFI-7: MM4 Service Reg. MFI-5: MM4 Process Reg. MFI-4: MM for Model Mapping MFI-3: MM for Ontology Reg. MFI-2: Core Model MFI-1: Reference Model Overview of MDR Metamodel MDR Metamodel describe Naming Identification & Classification 11 data element Stewardship owner Registration Authority Overview of MFI Metamodel Administerd Items of MDR MFI Metamodel describe Naming Identification & Classification 12 Models Stewardship owner Registration Authority MFI Part 6 can align with MDR Part 6 and normatively reference the Relevant clauses of MDR Part 6 We should define INTEGRATION POLICY Policy Jeju-1 • Align 11179 Part 6 (new edition) with 19763-6 (new standard). These are different standards, but should be aligned, not combined. • During development of the two standards, the editors should be careful to align the specifications of the two standards. • We should not combine 11179-6 and 19763-6 into a single standard. To be reconsidered (2009.08.22) Also, to be defined CONSTRAINTS TO BE DEFINED How to Proceed • Oxford Univ., London2 days (out of WG2 meeting) “Study period Meeting on Integration of MDR/MFI” • Email discussion – SC32WG2-interest (News) – [email protected] • Technical Issues stocktaking (List of Issues); By 2009. 09.30 – Masao Okabe, Ray Gates, Kevin Keck – Baba, Frank, Horiuchi • Expected Deliverable : – – – – Issues list Strategy Rationale Proposal • Editors work together to align: Horiuchi How to Promote? • What are sharable between 11179-3 & 19763? ( Identification, Naming, Administrative clauses) • Is it possible to define a new part as independent standard ? (When: the end of 11179-3 ed.3 ) New 11179-5+ • Align specifications between MDR & MFI for example, as we are trying to do with 11179-3 & 19763-3. keep consistency on the terminology & definitions • Actions to look for area between two standards where we need work on alignment. For example, as we are trying to do with 11179-6 & 19763-6. • 20943-6 (Procedure for the specification of Web ontology ) should cover both MDR-3 & MFI-3 • A new edition of 11179-5(Naming & Identification) should be possible after completing 11179-3 Ed3. • We should consider the possibility of aligning a new MDR-5 between MFI & MDR. • Registration Procedure(Part 6) of 11179 & 19763
© Copyright 2024 ExpyDoc
