Problems and Advantages PCT has for Offices

AIPLA/FICPI Colloquium
April 8-9,2003
Problems and Advantages
PCT has for JPO
Shinjiro Ono
Deputy Commissioner
Japan Patent Office
Key Points of “ the Intellectual Property Policy Outline”
Realization of
“Nation Built on Intellectual Property”
Establishment of “Nation Built on
Intellectual Property” means activation of
the economy and society by increasing the
added value of products and services
through intellectual property
Pillars
Comprehensive Measures are
needed regarding Intellectual
Property
(1) Creation
(2) Protection
Present Situation and Problems
●Decline of Japanese Industrial
Competitiveness
●Need to establish the Intellectual Creation
Cycle
(3) Utilization
(4) Human Resource
Development
Specific Action Plan
Reinforcement of measures for establishing
a global patent system
GLOBAL PATENT SYSTEM
- To enable applicants to quickly obtain patent rights
- To reduce the workload of patent Offices
PCT
reform
Mutual use of prior art
Search and Examination
results
Substantive Patent Law
Treaty
Increase of international applications
under the PCT
(In thousand)
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
1985
1987
1989
1991
1993
1995
1997
1999
2001
PCT - One of possible approaches
to the Global Patent System
- De facto global system
118 contracting states, 114,048 applications
- PCT International Search and Preliminary Examination
Guidelines
- Further reform of PCT
Expanding Use
PCT Filings by JP
Others
CA
CH
KR
SE
NL
FR
13%
US
39%
4%
4%
6%
GB
12%
JP
13%
DE
12% of the PCT Applications are filed by JP
Filings to US by PCT/Paris route
by PCT
GB
by Paris
48%
FR 43%
DE
48%
10%
KR
JP
Origin
14%
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
The applications from JP less use the PCT route
Increase of JPO’s Workloads
300,000
Request for Exam
First Action
250,000
200,000
150,000
100,000
50,000
0
1997
1998
1999
Established ISR
2000
2001
Established IPER
16000
12000
8000
4000
0
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
Designation per international
application filed in JP
Average No of States
Designated
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
1997
1998
1999
year
2000
2001
Conclusion
• Expansion of PCT system
toward the “Global Patent System”
• Efficient process of PCT applications
through the international and
national phase
Further Reform
Thank you