Consultant - VERVE Symposium

Thrombosuction for Acute Limb Ischemia
Equipment, Technical Tips and Results
A. Katsargyris, W. Ritter, B. Moehner, M. Bruck, and E. Verhoeven
Paracelsus Medical University, Klinikum Nuernberg, Germany
Disclosures
• William Cook Europe/Cook Inc.
– Consultant & Research grants
• W.L. Gore & Associates
– Consultant & Research grants
• Atrium
– Consultant
• Siemens
– Consultant
• Medtronic
– Advisory board
Background (1)
Conventional Treatment of Acute Limb Ischemia
(ALI)
• Heparinisation+delayed surgery (Grade I)
• Prompt Embolectomy/Bypass (Grade II)
↓
Up to 40% amputation rates
Ann Vasc Surg, 1995;9:32-38
Background (2)
Alternative Treatment of Acute Limb Ischemia
(ALI)
• Thrombolysis (Passive clot lysis → 48h duration)
→ Only for Grade I
• Thrombosuction (Immediate clot removal)
→ For Grade I & II
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2000;20:138-45
Equipment
• 8F Sheath
– Removable Valve
• 8F Aspiration catheter
– 1 end-hole
• 6F Aspiration catheter
– Smooth tip (crural)
• 50cc Syringe
Technique (1)
• Aspiration catheter just
above the proximal end of
the thrombus
• Do not cross the thrombus
– Avoid distal embolisation
Technique (2)
• Continuous aspiration
– 50cc Syringe
• Catheter withdrawal
• Clot removal
Technique (3)
• Valve disconnection for
large thrombus removal
Technique (4)
• Repeat sequence until
no more thrombi can be
aspirated
• Adjunct PTA/Stenting if
residual stenosis or
remaining clots
Technique (5)
• 8F Closure device
• Immediate heparinisation
Indication
Pt with Acute Limb Ischemia
– Relative recent onset of symptoms
– Fresh thrombus on DSA
– Relatively short occlusion
– Femoral, popliteal, crural level
Patient Demographics
• 2009-2013
• N = 262
– Mean age, 74.5 ± 11 yrs
– 49.6 % male
– 41.6% ASA II, 53.4% ASA III
Severity of ALI
Rutherford Classification
• Grade I (Viable)
199 (76%)
• Grade II (Threatened)
63 (24%)
Early Outcome
• Technical success
– Additional PTA
– Additional PTA & Stenting
• 30-d Mortality
• Additional open surgery
– Embolectomy
– Bypass
• 30-d Major amputation
237 (91%)
78 (29.8%)
72 (27.5%)
12 (4.6%)
11 (4.2%)
5 (1.9%)
6 (2.3%)
2 (0.8%)
Follow-up
Mean 26.2 ± 16 months
• New onset of symptoms
• Reintervention
• Major amputation
– AKA
– BKA
• Related death
61 (23.3%)
35 (13.4%)
10 (3.8%)
5
5
2 (0.8%)
Freedom from Reintervention
90.4 ± 2% at 1 year
80 ± 3.7% at 3 years
Freedom from Amputation
94.1 ± 1.7% @ 1 year
93.5 ± 1.8% @ 3 years
Case (1)
• 88 YO Female Pt
• ALI (left) 20 h ago
– Grade I
• Atrial Fibrilation
MRA →
Case (1)
Initial DSA
After Thrombosuction
Case (2)
• 69 YO Male Pt
• Claudication (50m) left
– 1 week onset, Grade I
• Heart Failure
MRA→
Case (2)
Initial DSA
After Thrombosuction After Stenting
Case (3)
• 76 YO Female Pt
• PAD st IIb
• Elective SFA Stenting
Case (3)
Iatrogenic TF Trunk embolisation
After Thrombosuction
Case (4)
• 63 YO Male Pt
• Elective AFS Stenting (left)
– (2 years before)
• ALI (Left)
– Grade II
MRA→
• Acute AFS stent thrombosis (?)
Case (4)
Initial DSA
After Thrombosuction After PTA + Stent
Conclusions
Thombosuction
– Simple equipment and idea
– Minimal invasive
– Quick treatment (vs Trombolysis)
– ↑ Technical success in acute and subacute cases
– Durable in the mid-term
– Does not preclude surgery if it fails
Thrombosuction for Acute Limb Ischemia
Equipment, Technical Tips and Results
A. Katsargyris, W. Ritter, B. Moehner, M. Bruck, and E. Verhoeven
Paracelsus Medical University, Klinikum Nuernberg, Germany