262 Abstracts / Basal Ganglia 2 (2012) 257–265 Background: In the last decade, the relationship between cognitive function and gait performances has received increasing attention. The present study aimed to describe the gait pattern in patients affected by Parkinson’s disease (PD) with or without mild cognitive impairment (MCI+, MCI ). We also sought to find an association between gait pattern and specific cognitive profiles. Methods: Forty-three patients with PD (19 MCI+ and 24 MCI ) and 20 age- and gender-matched healthy subjects (HS) were enrolled. We compared the gait pattern among MCI+ vs MCI vs HS in the following conditions: (1) normal gait; (2) motor dual task; (3) cognitive dual task, by means of a gait analysis system. In PD patients, gait patterns were evaluated in both off and on state. Memory, executive and visuospatial domains were evaluated with an extensive neuropsychological battery. Results: Compared with MCI and HS, MCI+ PD patients displayed reduced step length and swing time and impairment of measures of dynamic stability, which were only partially reverted by levodopa. We also found that dual task conditions affected several walking parameters in MCI+ PD at off and on state with respect to MCI and HS . Factor analysis revealed two independent factors, namely pace and stability. The latter was strongly and directly correlated with the visuospatial domain. Conclusions: Dysfunctions on specific gait parameters, which are poorly responsive to levodopa and highly sensitive to dual tasks, are associated with MCI in PD patients. Importantly, visuospatial impairment is strongly associated with the development of instability and more generally with the progression of PD. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.baga.2012.04.017 17 Rehabilitation improves dyskinesias in Parkinsonian patients: A pilot study comparing two different rehabilitative treatments Giuseppe Frazzitta a, Gabriella Bertotti a, Giulio Riboldazzi c, Elisa Pelosin d, Micaela Morelli e,f, Pietro Balbi a, Natalia Boveri a, Cristoforo Comi g, Marinella Turla h, Roberta Rovescala a, Guido Felicetti a, Roberto Maestri b a Department of Neurorehabilitation, Scientific Institute of Montescano, S. Maugeri Foundation IRCCS, Montescano, Italy, b Department of Biomedical Engineering, Scientific Institute of Montescano, S. Maugeri Foundation IRCCS, Montescano, Italy, c Center for Parkinson’s Disease, Macchi Foundation, Varese and Department of Rehabilitation, ‘‘Le Terrazze’’ Hospital, Cunardo, Italy, d Department of Neurosciences, University of Genoa, Italy, e Department of Toxicology, Centre of Excellence for Neurobiology of Dependence, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy, f CNR Institute for Neuroscience, Section of Cagliari, Italy, g Department of Neurology, University of the Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy, h Department of Neurology, Valle Camonica Hospital, Esine, Italy Background: The present study was devised: (a) to test whether an intensive multidisciplinary rehabilitation treatment (60 h) for Parkinsonian patients is effective in improving dyskinesia and motor performance compared to a control group undergoing a non-intensive non multidisciplinary rehabilitation treatment (30 h) and (b) to verify whether rehabilitation may lead to a reduction in levodopa dosage. Methods: Forty Parkinsonian patients suffering from dyskinesias were admitted to study: 20 for an intensive (group-1) and 20 for a standard treatment (group-2). The rating scales used for the clinical evaluation were: Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scales (UPDRS) II, III, IV, Parkinson’s disease disability scale (PDDS), Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS). Results: All outcome measurements improved in both groups of patients, but patients group-1 presented better results: UPDRS II was reduced by 33% in group-1 and by 22% in group-2, UPDRS III 29% vs. 22%, UPDRS IV 74% vs. 10%, PDDS 18% vs. 12%, and AIMS 71% vs. 8%. A different behaviour was observed for levodopa dosage at baseline and after treatment: dosage decreased by an average value of 210 mg (p < 0.0001) in group-1 and was virtually unchanged (30 mg reduction, p = 0.08) in group-2. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that a rehabilitation protocol should be considered as a valid non-invasive therapeutic support for patients who show dyskinesias and that there are better results when the treatment is intensive. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.baga.2012.04.018 18 Short- and long-term efficacy of intensive rehabilitation treatment on balance and gait in Parkinsonian patients: A pilot study with a 1-year follow-up G. Frazzitta a, G. Bertotti a, P. Balbi a, D. Uccellini b, N. Boveri a, R. Rovescala a, R. Maestri a a Department of Neurorehabilitation, Scientific Institute of Montescano, S. Maugeri Foundation IRCCS, Montescano, Italy, b Department of Neurology, Tradate Hospital, Varese, Italy Background: Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder in which gait and balance disturbances are relevant symptoms that respond poorly to pharmacological treatment. Recent studies demonstrated that physical exercise improves balance and gait but the persistence over time of beneficial effects and the optimal content of exercise intervention remain open questions. The aim of this study was to investigate whether a multidisciplinary intensive rehabilitation treatment (IRT) is effective in improving balance and gait and whether improvements persist at a 1-year follow-up. Methods: We studied 20 PD patients (age: 71 ± 7 years) who underwent an IRT (4 weeks, three daily sessions of one hour each, 5 days a week). Outcome measures were UPDRS items for balance, falls and walk, Berg Balance Scale, 6-min walking test, Timed Up and Go Test, and Comfortable-Fast gait speeds. Patients were evaluated at admission, at the end of treatment, and at a 1-year follow-up. Pharmacological therapy was unchanged during IRT and at followup. Results: All outcome measures improved significantly at the end of IRT. At follow-up, UPDRS_walk and Comfortable-Fast gait speeds still maintained better values with respect to admission (p = 0.009, p = 0.03 and p = 0.02, respectively), while the remaining scales did not differ significantly. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that the IRT was effective in improving balance and gait and that the improvement in gait performances was maintained also after 1 year. These results point out that Parkinsonian patients, despite the degenerative nature of the disease, have the potential to improve balance and gait, and maintain the result over time. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.baga.2012.04.019 19 Working on asymmetry in Parkinson’s disease: A double-blind, randomized, controlled rehabilitation trial L. Ricciardi a,b, D. Ricciardi c, F. Lena d, M. Petracca a, S. Barricella d, N. Modugno d, G. Zuccalà c, A.R. Bentivoglio a, A. Fasano a,e a Istituto di Neurologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy, b Department of Neuroscience, University of Messina, Italy, Abstracts / Basal Ganglia 2 (2012) 257–265 c Department of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Catholic University of Medicine, Rome, Italy, d Neuromed Institute, Pozzilli (IS), Italy, e Department of Neuroscience, AFaR-Fatebenefratelli Hospital, Rome, Italy Background: Posture, gait and balance problems are very disabling symptoms in Parkinson’s disease (PD). Gait cycle in PD shows increased stride-to-stride variability because of the reduction of gait automaticity and asymmetry of lower limbs function. These feature predispose to freezing of gait (FOG) and recurrent falls. Aim of the study was to evaluate how the modulation of asymmetry through physiotherapy might improve gait and FOG preventing falls. Methods: Twenty-eight PD patients entered the study and were evaluated at baseline and after three months of rehabilitative program (performed twice a week) by means of the motor part of the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS-III), Gait and Falls Questionnaire (GFQ), Tinetti balance and gait scale, Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), European Quality of Life questionnaire (EQ-5D). Patients were randomly assigned to (1) physiotherapy for worst side improvement (WSI), (2) physiotherapy for best side improvement (BSI), and (3) standard physical therapy (SPT). Patients were unaware of study’s aim and evaluations were carried out by blinded physiotherapist and doctor. Results: After three months, all three groups showed a significant improvement at the Tinetti and SPPB scores. The magnitude of change (end of treatment compared to baseline) was analyzed among groups: BSI led to a greater improvement than SPT in terms of UPDRS-III (p = 0.01), Tinetti total score (p = 0.05) and Tinetti gait subscore (p = 0.01). No other significant differences arose. Conclusions: Our study confirms the usefulness of physical therapy in the treatment of PD and, more importantly, suggests that specific intervention tailored on individual feature (e.g. asymmetry of motor condition) might be even more effective than standard rehabilitative programs. The impact of such approach on the benefit duration and rate of falls should be prospectively assessed by future trials. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.baga.2012.04.020 263 the alterations of walking and freezing were treated by the visual and auditory stimuli, including multi-sensorial stimulation also administered by the Wii balance. The obtained results so far point to an invalid improving performance assessed in the UPDRS III, the TUG, the beginning and the end of treatment. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.baga.2012.04.021 21 Conditional entropy-based evaluation of the postural control complexity in patients with Parkinson’s disease F. Anasetti, C.A. Frigo, V. Bari, S. Bersini, A. Porta, D. Servello, M. Porta Laboratory of Motion Analysis, IRCCS Galeazzi Institute, Milan, Italy The Parkinson’s disease (PD) patient exhibits postural instability and difficulty in generating corrective action. The aim of this study was to characterize postural control of PD patients and to describe the effects of electrical stimulation of sub-cortical areas. The posture of 12 patients with PD undergoing deep brain stimulation (DBS) was studied during eyes open (EO) and eyes closed (EC) before surgery, after electrodes implantation and after device activation. This study proposes a new method to quantify the postural control based on the complexity analysis of the signal representing the sway of the center of pressure (CoP) during a 30 s orthostatic standing in sagittal and in frontal plane. The signal complexity was quantified by the conditional entropy: an higher conditional entropy means a lower predictability and a greater complexity of the postural control. A temporal and spectral analysis of the CoP series were also performed. Statistical analysis showed a significant influence of the direction of sway and of the visual control on the complexity of postural control and on both temporal and spectral characteristics of the CoP series. A significant influence of the electrical stimulation on both temporal and spectral analysis but not on the complexity of postural control was also found. This finding could be justified by a reduction of muscle stiffness after surgical intervention. The lack of visual control may simplify postural control connectivity due to an increased required attention level. A short term sub-cortical stimulation has no effects on PD postural strategy. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.baga.2012.04.022 20 Use of visual and auditory cues in the freezing control in Parkinson’s disease P. Marano, M. Seminara Department of Rehabilitation Villa dei Gerani Clinic, Catania, Italy The alteration of the step affects nearly all patients suffering from Parkinson’s disease and increases during the progression of the disease. The deficit is more important than the change in stride length. The alteration of the gait alters the proportional relationship between length and height from the ground up, with a significant increase in these patients the risk of tripping during the swing phase of walking. It is important to educate patients to walk with the appropriate steps in length. For these reasons, the use of external cues and cognitive strategies are the most important options for the correction of the path. The visual cues tend to normalize the spatial and temporal gait variables. The visual cues tend to normalize the spatial and temporal gait variables. Given attentional strategies, such as walking with long strides and swinging arms, are effective in improving stride length and speed. Turn around along the way is very problematic for patients with episodes of freezing or motor instability. Usually when the elderly make a 360° turn along the gait, are less than 6 steps to complete the round. In contrast, patients with PD and motor instability are also 20 steps to turn, and each step becomes smaller and smaller until the full stop. In the present study 22 GPi Deep Brain Stimulation after STN DBS: Cases report I. Bertaina a, B. Minafra a, D. Servello b, R. Zangaglia a, C. Pacchetti a a Parkinson’s Disease and Movement Disorders Unit, Fondazione Istituto Neurologico Nazionale IRCCS ‘‘C.Mondino’’, Pavia, Italy, b Functional Neurosurgical Unit, IRCCS ‘‘Galeazzi’’, Milano, Italy Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) is the surgical procedure of choice in advanced patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD) complicated by motor fluctuations. The subthalamic nucleus (STN) and the globus pallidus internal (GPi) are the two most common targets used to treat PD. Anyway the most source of information about the efficacy of this procedure came from STN DBS. Only recently the comparison between GPi and STN DBS in advanced PD had shown in 24 months follow-up study similar improvement in motor score; GPi DBS also improved depression while in STN patients it worsened, finally the reduction of dopaminergic therapy was higher in STN DBS patients [1]. Experiences of simultaneous stimulation of both STN and GPi are inconclusive and limited in literature [2,3]. The long term follow-up at 4, 8 and recently at 9 years after STN DBS shows that while the improvement of levodopa induced motor complications are maintained, freezing, postural instability, falling, speech difficulties and cognitive impairment emerge as the major source of disability
© Copyright 2024 ExpyDoc