RESCODE CLAUSE 54: WRITTEN ASSESSMENT The following is an assessment against the Objectives of clause 54 of the City of Yarra's Planning Scheme: The proposed alteration works pertain to the front portion of the existing dwelling, whilst the additions are to the rear of the property. They can be summarised as follows: >replacing existing front verandah roof sheeting with new steel corrugated sheeting and clear transparent sections. Profile to remain unchanged. >replacing existing timber fence & gate with new fences & gates >new paint colours to front elevation >demolition of existing rear structures and associated roof coverings >new single storey addition to rear with new lightwell along east boundary >new roller door to rear boundary 54.01 Neighbourhood and Site Description and Design Response 54.01-1 Neighbourhood and Site Description Refer to the following: tp-1.01 existing conditions photos 01 tp-1.02 existing conditions photos 02 tp-1.03 site analysis plan & site context plan 54.01-2 Design Response Refer to the following: tp-2.01 existing conditions & demolition plan tp-2.02 existing & demolition roof plan tp-2.03 proposed ground floor plan tp-2.04 proposed roof plan tp-2.05 existing elevations 01 tp-2.06 existing elevations 02 tp-2.07 proposed elevations 01 tp-2.08 proposed elevations 02 54.02 Neighbourhood Character 54.02-1 Neighbourhood Character STANDARD Al The neighbourhood is characterised by a variety of residential dwellings built over the last century. There is an eclectic mix of attached Victorian brick terraces: single and double storeys, freestanding brick dwellings, two storey brick apartments from the 1970's to contemporary town houses. These buildings vary in scale, materials, finishes and form. Allotment sizes also vary, ranging from relatively narrow, single fronted blocks of approximately 5 metres wide to wider blocks of up to 12 metres. Generally the allotments are without crossovers. The subject property is a single storey brick terrace which shares a party wall and overall roof line with the adjoining property no. 34 to its east. No.32 being effectively 1/3 of the overall building and no. 34 being the remaining 2/3. To the west, no. 28 is a single storey, double fronted brick dwelling probably built in the 1940s. The proposed works which affect the front portion of the dwelling respond to and respect the neighbourhood character. The new front fence and verandah will improve the appearance of the property from the street view. They will compliment the existing fence and verandah of the adjoining property: no. 34. The rear addition works are single storey and will revitalise the amenities of the subject property. The scale and design of the rear works respects the existing dwelling and general neighbourhood. These rear works will not be visible from the street. Conclusion: Complies 54.02-2 Integration with the Street: STANDARD A2 The orientation of the dwelling remains orientated to the front street and unchanged. The height of the new fence will remain unchanged: 1.6m. Conclusion: Complies 54.03 Site Layout and Building Massing 54.03-1 Street Setback: STANDARD A3 There is no change to the street setback of the subject dwelling. Conclusion: n/a Complies 54.03-3 Site Coverage: STANDARD AS The site area covered by buildings is 74%, which exceeds the noted standard of 60%. To comply to this standard is difficult on a small site allotment of only 152sqm. The non building area coverage is approximately 37.5sqm which is relatively generous and consistent with the surrounding properties of the neighbourhood. The excess site coverage does not impact on visual bulk of the building. Conclusion: Refer to decision guidelines. 54.03-4 Permeability: STANDARD A6 The permeability percentage of the existing property is less than 20%, as currently the rear outdoor space consists of impermeable paving. The proposed works result in the percentage of the permeable surfaces being approx.18% of the overall site. These surfaces are made up of areas to the front garden, lightwell and rear outdoor space, which also has the dual purpose of car parking. The proposed material for this rear outdoor space will be one that allows permeability. Conclusion: Refer to decision guidelines. 54.03-5 Enemy Efficiency Protection: STANDARD Al Solar cells are to be installed on the new roof of the single storey rear addition. North facing glazing have been incorporated to new rear living space addition to allow solar access and natural daylight entry. The insertion of the central lightwell enables this, together with high level glazing. All new glazing will be double glazed and will contribute to the insulation properties. Other passive energy saving measures to be incorporated include the use of thermal insulation to all new external walls & roof structure. All lighting will be of the low energy LED type. Conclusion: Complies 54.03-6 Significant Trees: STANDARD A8 The front garden has been retained, which will allow landscaping and low level planting as per adjoining properties. Two existing trees in the rear yard will be removed in the proposed works. These trees however, are not deemed significant. Conclusion: Complies 54.03-7 Parking: STANDARD A9 Existing on site parking for one car is retained. Conclusion: Refer to decision guidelines. 54.03-2 Building Height: STANDARD A4 The rear addition works are single storey and in keeping with the scale of the existing neighbourhood character. The maximum building height does not exceed that specified. Conclusion: Complies 32 Rowena Parade2Pichmond: Proposed Additions & Alterations tp-1 .0b rescode clause 54 assessment 30.09.14 rosstang ARCHITECTS www.rosstang.com.au [email protected] 9818 0393 54.04 Amenity Impacts 54.05 On Site Amenity and Facilities 54.04-1 Side & Rear Setback: STANDARD A10 Proposed setbacks do not impact any further on adjoining amenity areas. 54.05-1 Daylight to New Windows: STANDARD A16 All new habitable room windows have access to adequate daylighting. Conclusion: Complies Conclusion: Complies 54.04-2 Walls on Boundaries: STANDARD All There is an overall reduction of 1.52m of boundary walls. A 3.38m reduction to the west & an addition of 1.86m to the east. 54.05-2 Private Open Space: STANDARD All The total private open space area is 48sqm. The rear outdoor area attributes to 23sqm of this overall area, which is only 2sqm less than 25sqm minimum required under this standard. Again, given the small site allotment, the private open spaces proposed are relatively generous. The height of the new walls on boundary do not exceed an average of 3m and no part is higher than 3.6m. 54.05-3 Solar Access to Open Space: STANDARD A18 The proposed private open space locations remain unchanged. Conclusion: n/a Complies Conclusion: Complies 54.06 Detailed Design 54.04-4 North Facing Windows: STANDARD A13 Proposed works do not affect the adjoining existing north facing windows. 54.06-1 Detailed Design: STANDARD A19 Proposed works to the front street elevation respect the existing neighbourhood character. The details of the front verandah and front fence will be in keeping with the design elements of the surrounding properties in scale, materials and articulation. Conclusion: Complies 54.04-5 Overshadowing Open Space: STANDARD A14 Proposed rear addition works are single storey and overall increase the built area of the subject dwelling by 7.3sqm. These additional works have a minimal additional overshadowing of the adjoining secluded open space areas. The new rear roller door will be similar in scale and materials as the existing and surrounding properties Conclusion: Complies 54.06-2 Front Fences: STANDARD A20 The existing front fences of the surrounding properties in the neighbourhood vary in styles, materials and height. They range from wrought iron on the two storey terraces opposite the subject dwelling, to concrete blocks of adjacent no. 30 and a variety of face, painted and rendered brickwork further along Rowena Parade, as well as timber pickets. The proposed front fence will be the same 1.6m high which is the same height as the existing. It will have a bluestone base and timber pickets The pickets will be positioned 90deg to allow transparency but also privacy from passers by. The new gate will also be constructed from timber pickets. 54.04-6 Overlooking: STANDARD A15 Proposed single storey addition works to the rear do not present any overlooking views into the existing adjoining secluded open space areas or habitable room windows. Conclusion: Complies 32 Rowena Parade lies within Heritage Overlay (H0332) of the City of Yarra Planning Scheme The subject dwelling is a typical single fronted brick terrace dwelling within this overlay. The scale, proportions and materials are typical of the tight urban fabric of the neighbourhood. The current alterations to the rear of the dwelling date from to the 1960's and are overdue for an upgrade. Conclusion: Complies Conclusion: Complies 54.04-3 Daylight to Existing Windows: STANDARD Al2 The proposed lightwell will allow daylight to the existing window of subject dwelling's bedroom 2. The existing habitable room windows of the adjoining properties are not affected by the proposed works. HERITAGE OVERLAY: WRITTEN ASSESSMENT Conclusion: Complies The alterations to the front street elevation of the subject dwelling is limited to the reconstruction of the front verandah and a new front fence and gate. Particular consideration has be given to its relationship with the adjoining dwelling no. 34 to the east, as it shares a common roofline. The dwellings to the east and west along this streetscape are mainly single storey and similar in proportion and scale. There are some two storey dwellings along Rowena Parade, notably a row of four two storey Victorian terraces opposite the subject site. The proposed works to the front elevation will enhance the subject property's street presentation and appearance. It will complete the 'upgrade' of the overall building. The rear additions are single storey and complement the architectural integrity of the original terrace. The additions are to the rear of the site and therefore they are not visible from the street and fall within the requirements of the Heritage Overlay. The materials, scale and proportions of the proposed works do not dominate the existing building. Conclusion: Complies Conclusion: Complies 32 Rowina LP-1 30.09.14 i9. RichMOn(t Proposed Additiaris &Alterations rescode cause b4 heritage overlay statements rosstang ARCHITECTS www.rosstang.com.au [email protected] 9818 0393
© Copyright 2024 ExpyDoc