Association of American Railroads Natural Gas Fuel Tender Technical Advisory Group (AAR NGFT TAG) update Michael E. Iden, PE , Union Pacific Railroad, for Ft. Worth, Texas September 3, 2014 1 US frt. RR energy use in perspective 0.8 quads of natural gas used by all motor vehicles US frt. RRs used ~0.5 quad (3.5B USG diesel) = 0.51% of total US energy usage 0.51 … and produce 40% of US freight GTMs Ft. Worth, Texas September 3, 2014 2 LNG as a freight RR fuel: 5 key challenges 1. Availability of natural gas 2. Liquefaction (LNG production) & infrastructure 3. Locomotives/engines which can use natural gas fuel 4. Fuel tenders to transport/supply in-motion “ “ “ 5. Integration of all-above into N. Am. rail network How do we migrate in this direction? Ft. Worth, Texas September 3, 2014 3 Natural gas in the railroad emissions arena • Significant improvement made in locomotive emissions – EPA Tiers 0/0+, 1,1+, 2/2+, 3 and soon Tier 4 (and large capex acquisitions!) – Criteria emittants NOx, PM, HC, CO – Greenhouse gases (GHG), primarily CO2 (improvements in fuel efficiency) • • • • Improvement in air quality nationwide since CAA & amendments But, continuing/growing challenges meeting NAAQS in some areas SIPs Global emphasis on GHG Ft. Worth, Texas September 3, 2014 4 Definitions1 • TAG: Technical Advisory Group – Like an AAR Committee except non-permanent w/ one specific mission • A cool location for our 1st TAG meeting – Edmonton, Alberta on January 29, 2013: Ft. Worth, Texas -9oF ambient, -34oF wind chill September 3, 2014 5 January sun at 53.5333o North Ft. Worth, Texas September 3, 2014 6 Definitions2 • Tender: Locomotive Fuel Tender – – – – – Rolling stock designed to transport & supply fuel to a moving locomotive Defined by US DOT FRA as being a “locomotive appurtenance” Is not a “tank car” when functioning as a fuel tender Long history in steam era, particularly to carry boiler water … Long-distance op’ing range challenge with natural gas & onboard tanks “One of the most neglected topics of locomotive history is the tender. This indispensable auxiliary to locomotive operation was largely ignored by contemporary technical press as well. … The earliest surviving drawing of an American locomotive tender is that of the South Carolina Railroad’s “West Point” … completed in 1831 … The water was carried in a large cask.” John H. White, Jr., A History of the American Steam Locomotive, Its Development: 1830-1880, 1968, page 233 Ft. Worth, Texas September 3, 2014 7 Tenders eliminated in steam-to-diesel conversion (except for one, UP 844’s tender, built in 1944) Ft. Worth, Texas September 3, 2014 8 Definitions3 • LNG: Liquefied Natural Gas – – – – – Cryogenic liquid @ -260 degrees F; predominantly methane (CH4) Manufactured by refrigerating natural gas, condensing vapor into liquid Energy density ~60% that of petroleum diesel (ie, 1.6x volume needed) Must be stored in cryogenic (insulated) tanks Not to be confused with LPG (liquefied petroleum gas) • LPG manufactured by compression liquefaction of propane and butane • CNG: Compressed Natural Gas – – – – Manufactured by placing natural gas under pressure (compressing it) Typically at 3000~5000 pounds per square inch gauge (PSIG) Energy density ~25% that of petroleum diesel (ie, 4x volume needed) Must be stored in pressurized tanks Ft. Worth, Texas September 3, 2014 9 AAR NGFT TAG • Chartered by AAR TSWC on October 4, 2012 • 1st meeting Edmonton, AB, Canada, January 29, 2013 • About 38 working days of TAG meetings since “ “ “ Ft. Worth, Texas September 3, 2014 10 AAR NGFT TAG membership *AAR rolling stock-related Committees Braking Eqpmt. HazMat Loco. Tank AAR TTCI Amtrak BNSF CN CP CSX FEC KCS NS UP (*other/Comm.) XXXXXX XX X X X X X X X XXX XX X X XX X X X X X X X X X X X X FRA Safety FRA R&D XXX XX X = AAR Committee chairman, X = AAR Committee member Ft. Worth, Texas September 3, 2014 11 Joint AAR & FRA activity • FRA has been full participant since April 2013 – – – – Office of Safety, and Office of R&D (Rolling Stock) Providing regulatory perspective Allows immediate feedback of ideas Consensus on accident scenarios for modeling • Parallel crashworthiness modeling efforts – – – – FRA funds engineering models by Volpe NTSC (Cambridge, MA) AAR funds FEA modeling by ARA (Mountain View, CA) Approaching review of all accident scenario results Consensus approach to requirements in performance Standard • Transport Canada (TC) now joining TAG Ft. Worth, Texas September 3, 2014 12 Performance Standard versus Regulation? • AAR performance Standards – Insure interoperability of rolling stock between RRs – Standards are mandatory – Locomotives (and future Tenders) versus Freight Cars • • • • Freight cars are governed by AAR Interchange Rules Locomotives are not “ “ “ “ “ RRs execute loco. “run through” agreements governing usage RRs sign AAR Loco. Interchange Agreement guaranteeing Standardization • Regulations – As with locomotive crashworthiness (S-580 & S-5506 v 49CFR229 Appendix E) • Likely AAR performance Standard(s) for Tenders will be incorporated by reference in some future FRA regulation(s) Ft. Worth, Texas September 3, 2014 13 Cryogenic fuel tender • “Tank in a tank” – Annular space (between tanks) insulated, high vacuum – Minimizes transfer of heat from ambient environment • Outer tank – Carbon steel • Inner tank – Stainless steel, 8% nickel content, strength @ cryogenic temps. Gaseous methane Refrigerated (liquefied) methane Gaseous natural gas to locomotive Gaseous natural gas to locomotive Ft. Worth, Texas September 3, 2014 14 NGFT TAG mission tasks1: safety • Public and employee safety • Preventing unintended release of fuel • Crashworthiness – – – – Patterned after RSAC Locomotive Crashworthiness ‘98-’05 Incorporating much recent development work from tank cars, NGTC, etc. Extensive modeling of various scenarios Volpe NTSC (for FRA) & Applied Research Assoc. (for AAR) • Regulatory & other requirements – FRA; AAR; NFPA; etc. • Environmental issues – Minimizing/preventing fugitive emissions of CH4 Ft. Worth, Texas September 3, 2014 15 NGFT TAG mission tasks2: multiple interfaces • • • • • • Working with locomotive OEMs & interested parties Working with potential tender manufacturers Mechanical interface (hoses, cables) Physical interface (pressures, flow rates, temperatures) Regulatory interface (safety appliances, etc) Infrastructure interface (tender fill connections) Ft. Worth, Texas September 3, 2014 16 NGFT TAG mission tasks3: interoperability Ft. Worth, Texas September 3, 2014 17 N. Am. freight RRs are very unlike trucking Truckers generally do NOT exchange equipment! Ft. Worth, Texas September 3, 2014 18 NGFT TAG schedule • The Big Question – “When will a NG fuel tender performance Standard be made available?” • TAG has been working diligently to fulfill its mission – Roughly 6 years of “regular” AAR Committee work in <2 years – Unprecedented collaboration of cross-functional RR expertise • Locomotive, tank car, equipment design, braking systems, hazmat – Working groups established with interested parties – 2 Town Hall & 3 supplier-type meetings held to disseminate & gather info. – Oct. 21-22 Town Hall meeting in St. Louis (all interested parties) – TAG hoping to present draft performance Standard Ft. Worth, Texas September 3, 2014 19 Additional resources for reading Available from ASME (www.asme.org) http://railtec.illinois.edu/CEE/William%20W.%20Hay/Spring2013 presentations/UPIden%20UIUC%20Hay%20Seminar%202013Feb15%20%20Frt%20RR%20Energy-Alternatives%20&%20Challenges.pdf http://www.arb.ca.gov/railyard/ryagreement/112807lngqa.pdf Ft. Worth, Texas September 3, 2014 20 Ft. Worth, Texas September 3, 2014 21
© Copyright 2024 ExpyDoc