A COME & KISS* QDC readout scheme for the HADES Electromagnetic Calorimeter DPG-Frühjahrstagung Frankfurt 2014 * use commercial elements and keep it small & simple + + Adrian Rost TU Darmstadt for the HADES collaboration 18/03/2014 | DPG-Frühjahrstagung 2014, Frankfurt | Adrian Rost | 1 + = Motivation for a ECAL upgrade for HADES Future: HADES at FAIR (SIS100) For beam energies between 2 – 40 GeV/u the data base for p0 and h production is not complete interpretation of di-lepton data depends on models! Role of ECAL: o Measurement of p0 and h via ggdecay channel o Additional improvement of e/p separation at large momenta (p > 400 MeV/c) 18/03/2014 | DPG-Frühjahrstagung 2014, Frankfurt | Adrian Rost | 2 Mass vs. momentum distribution Au+Au at 4 GeV/u (RPC Region) ECAL for HADES Detector modules: Cherenkov lead glass modules from OPAL end cap calorimeter (163 modules x 6 sectors = 978; each 14kg) Module dimensions: 9.4 x 9.4 x 60 cm3 Energy resolution ~ 5%/√E, E in GeV Signal read out: PMT-EMI 9903KB (1.5”) (WA98 hadron calorimeter) ~600 PMT’s PMT – Hamamatsu R6091 (3“) PMT – Hamamatsu R8619 (1”) Digitizing board: 18/03/2014 | DPG-Frühjahrstagung 2014, Frankfurt | Adrian Rost | 3 HADES Trigger and Readout Board v3 (TRBv3) The COME & KISS Charge measurement principle Fast signal: leading edge (fast_LE), trailing edge (fast_TE) timing Slow signal: slow_LE, slow_TE charge-to-width (Q2W) ~ charge TRBv3 used as FPGA-TDC (time precision ~ 20 ps) and DAQ (developed at GSI see: http://trb.gsi.de/) 18/03/2014 | DPG-Frühjahrstagung 2014, Frankfurt | Adrian Rost | 4 From theory to reality: The new PaDiWa-AMPS frontend board for TRBv3 Fast signal: leading edge (fast_LE), trailing edge (fast_TE) timing Slow signal: slow_LE, slow_TE charge-to-width (Q2W) ~ charge TRBv3 used as FPGA-TDC (time res. ~ 16 ps???) and DAQ Proper thresholds settings are important near to the baseline as possible, to get a high dynamic range to near at baseline, problems with noise can appear 18/03/2014 | DPG-Frühjahrstagung 2014, Frankfurt | Adrian Rost | 5 PaDiWa-AMPS response to signals generated by LED pulses Green: analogue integrated signal Orange: slow charge-to-width (Q2W) signal Blue: fast timing signal 18/03/2014 | DPG-Frühjahrstagung 2014, Frankfurt | Adrian Rost | 6 40 ns Time resolution for pulser measurements Trigger signal (NIM) PMT like pulser signal as input into PaDiWa-AMPS, pulser sync. was used to trigger TRBv3 Measured was the jitter between fast_LE and TRBv3 trigger signal Up to now a time resolution of about ~ 83 ps / 𝟐 = 58 ps can be achieved Can still be improved with a proper calibration of FPGA-TDCs of TRBv3 and better pulser 18/03/2014 | DPG-Frühjahrstagung 2014, Frankfurt | Adrian Rost | 7 TRBv3 Test signals fast signal slow signal PaDiWa-AMPS Charge resolution for pulser measurements (without walk correction) Charge-to-width (Q2W) measurement for different signal widths (~ charges) generated by pulser Absolute charge resolution ~ 4.5 pC Relative charge resolution depends on attenuation resistor, for expected ECAL signals its below 0.5% 18/03/2014 | DPG-Frühjahrstagung 2014, Frankfurt | Adrian Rost | 8 Motivation for a beam-time at MAMI in Mainz 1 inch Hamamatsu R8619 1. Measure energy resolution of modules with different PMT types (1 inch Hamamatsu, 1.5 inch EMI, and 3 inch Hamamatsu) + price - collect less light than EMI 1.5 inch EMI 9903KB - not enough pieces 3 inch Hamamatsu R6091 Lead glass module from OPAL experiment 2. Test new PaDiWa Amps front-end board with TRB3 3. Measure pulse shapes and compare them with pulse shapes from cosmic muons and LED light 18/03/2014 | DPG-Frühjahrstagung 2014, Frankfurt | Adrian Rost | 9 +better light collection than EMI - price Test conditions at MAMI in Mainz Used secondary beam of g from MAMI facility at Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz g produced on Cu-target irradiated by 1508.4 MeV electron beam g beam intensity ~ 5 kHz (100 Hz in trigger-rate) Tagger Used tagger to select 8 known g energies (100 1400 MeV) 8 different trigger signals – 8 energies measured in one measurement Beam collimated by Ø 2 mm lead collimator placed 1.5 meters upstream Beam size in front of the modules ~ 6 mm 18/03/2014 | DPG-Frühjahrstagung 2014, Frankfurt | Adrian Rost | 10 The experimental setup in hall A2 18/03/2014 | DPG-Frühjahrstagung 2014, Frankfurt | Adrian Rost | 11 MAMI beam-time setup for PaDiWa-AMPS Master Trigger OR of Delayed Triggers Plastic scintillator 8 beam energies separated by time delay TRBv3 ECAL modules fast signal slow signal PaDiWa-AMPS Online analysis tools: dabc+Go4 as flexible stand-alone live monitoring and analysis package developed by PaDiWa group Hydra2 based offline analysis: DST production and hydra macro 18/03/2014 | DPG-Frühjahrstagung 2014, Frankfurt | Adrian Rost | 12 Energy calibration for the different PMT types Results consistent with reference measurements, i.e. CAEN ADC All detectors at nominal voltage (1 inch Hamamatsu close to maximal – saturation effects) at this HV saturation effects starts to appear – non-linear behavior! 18/03/2014 | DPG-Frühjahrstagung 2014, Frankfurt | Adrian Rost | 13 1 inch 1300V (nominal) 1 inch 1100V 1 inch 900V Relative energy resolution 1 inch PMT does not follow expected energy dependence 1 inch Ham. Resolution [%] 1.5 inch EMI 3 inch Ham. 18/03/2014 | DPG-Frühjahrstagung 2014, Frankfurt | Adrian Rost | 14 Best energy resolution for 3″ PMT integration parameters optimized for this PMT Summary PaDiWa-AMPS COME and KISS Q2W principle is working: In laboratory conditions In beam conditions Energy resolution of different ECAL modules at 1 GeV g beam measured with PaDiWa-AMPS comparable with reference measurement: 3″ PMT: 4.76% (PaDiWa-AMPS optimized to this PMT) 1.5″ PMT: 5.76% 1″ PMT: 7.78% Timing measurements of ECAL modules are in progress measurements with rotated modules show similar energy resolution as with nonrotated modules See also talk of A. Neiser on simulations for the PaDiWa AMPS (HK 6.3) 18/03/2014 | DPG-Frühjahrstagung 2014, Frankfurt | Adrian Rost | 15 Thank you for you attention!!! 1GSI Helmholtzzentrum, Darmstadt, Germany; 2Institute for Nuclear Research, Moscow, Russia; 3 Institut für Kernphysik, Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt, Germany; 4Nuclear Physics Institute of ASCR, Rez, Czech Republic; 5 Institut für Kernphysik, TU Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany; 6Smoluchowski Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University of Krakow, Poland; 7Institut für Kernphysik, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität, Mainz, Germany The HADES ECAL team: 1S. Linev, 2O. Petukhov, 1W. König, 3B. Kardan, 4O. Svoboda, 4P. Tlustý, 5A. Rost, 1J. Pietraszko, 4P. Ramos, 6G. Korcyl, 1M. Traxler, missing: 5T. Galatyuk, 3J. Michel, 1C. Ugur Special Thanks to the MAMI facility in Mainz for providing excellent beam conditions and their help with this measurements: 7A. Thomas, 7P. Ott, 7P. Otte, 7P. Skott, 7A. Neiser 18/03/2014 | DPG-Frühjahrstagung 2014, Frankfurt | Adrian Rost | 16 Backup 18/03/2014 | DPG-Frühjahrstagung 2014, Frankfurt | Adrian Rost | 17 COME & KISS: Charge Measurement with an FPGA Idea: Modified Wilkinson ADC Integrate input signal with a capacitor Discharge via a current source fast crossing of zero Q2W: Measure time to reach zero ~Q using an FPGA-TDC 18/03/2014 | DPG-Frühjahrstagung 2014, Frankfurt | Adrian Rost | 18 Walk correction via leading edges Q2W measured for different signal widths (~ charges) Jitter of the slow discriminator width (charge) can be corrected offline using jitter between leading edges of fast & slow signal (walk) Q2W resolution still can be improved 18/03/2014 | DPG-Frühjahrstagung 2014, Frankfurt | Adrian Rost | 19
© Copyright 2024 ExpyDoc