Judy A. Abbott Tracey C. Hasbun Amanda M. Rudolph Hayley C. Gillen Purpose To share an example of an educator preparation program assessment plan that focuses on continuous improvement To share an example of using data to inform program improvement (closing the loop) To share approaches to working with faculty and students in an environment of accountability and improvement 2 The National Conversation Higher Education American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education. (2011). Transformations in educator preparation: Effectiveness & accountability. Washington DC: AACTE. Darling-Hammond, Linda. (2000). Teacher quality & student achievement. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1):1-44. Retrieved from: http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/392 DQC, AACTE, CCSSO, & NCATE. (2010). Leveraging state longitudinal data systems to inform teacher preparation & continuous improvement. Washington, DC: Data Quality Campaign. Ewell, Peter T. (September, 2013). Principles for measures used in the CAEP accreditation process. A paper presented at the CAEP Conference, Arlington, VA. Retrieved from: http://caepnet.files.wordpress.com/2012/12/caep-measure-principles.pdf Ewell, Peter T. (2009). Assessment, accountability, & improvement: Revisiting the tension. Washington DC: National Center for Higher Education Management Systems. Retrieved from: http://www.learningoutcomeassessment.org/documents/PeterEwell_005.pdf 3 The National Conversation, cont. Educator Preparation Feuer, M.J., Floden, R.E., Chudowsky, N., & Ahn, J. (2013). Evaluation of teacher preparation programs: Purposes, methods, & policy options. Washington DC: National Academy of Education. Retrieved from: http://www.naeducation.org/xpedio/groups/naedsite/documents/webpage/naed_085581.pdf National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education. (2010). Transforming teacher education through clinical practice: A National Strategy for Prepare Effective Teachers. Retrieved from: http://www.ncate.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=zzeiB1OoqPk%3d&tabid=715 National Council on Teacher Quality. (2011). Student teaching in the United States. Retrieved from http://www.nctq.org/dmsView/Student_Teaching_United_States_Executive_Summary_pdf & http://www.nctq.org/dmsView/Key_Ingredients_Strong_Student_Teaching_pdf 4 History of our Assessment SACS accredited NCATE accredited since 1956 College developed data management system in FileMakerPro University adoption of TracDat for management of PLOs and results College moved to LiveText in 2011 University to adopt LiveText in Fall 2014 5 Tools for the PCOE TracDat LiveText Other Systems 6 Assessment System 6 colleges in the university all connect to PCOE 4 departments & one school 27 undergraduate & graduate programs 2 doctoral programs 38 initial educator certifications & 8 advanced 20+ sets of professional standards 82+ sets of PLOs 7 Process •Fall Data Day Early Fall •SACS Reports Due Oct. 15 (TracDat) •CAOC Review of SACS Reports (TracDat) Late Fall •Program & unit data entered by Dec. 31 (LiveText) Spring •SACS feedback to programs (via LiveText) •Program & unit data entered by May 28 (LiveText) • Compile assessment data in preparation for Fall Data Day Summer 8 In LiveText Spring 2014 Snapshot 1090 course sections 862 documents 82 forms 9 LiveText – Creating a Rubric – Community Relations Plan 10 LiveText – Creating an Assignment – Community Relations Plan 11 LiveText – Reporting – Community Relations Plan – Spring 2012 & Fall 2013 12 Faculty & Student Buy-In Faculty Whole group introduction Department/school overview Program workshops Individual coaching Student Whole group communication (letters, emails, webpages) New student orientations & convocations Course requirements Individual support 13 Process of Implementation LiveText/SFA • Phone conferences • Emails • Onsite visits • Webinars • LiveText Conference Developmental • Departmental meetings • Program discussions • Assessment plans 14 User Training • Login • Assessments • Rubrics • Reports LiveText Training (Snapshot) Developmental User Training October 2011—Human Services January 2012—Student Teaching (Demo) Mentor Teachers/Supervisors November 2011—Child Dev. & Lufkin ISD; Student Teaching Family Living; Fashion Mentor Teachers/Supervisors Merchandising (Overall) December 2011—Child Dev. & Family Living February 2012—Student Teaching January 2012—Visually Impaired; Supervisors in Nacogdoches ISD Orientation & Mobility February 2012—Speech Language Pathology; Superintendent Prep March 2012—ELL Prep; Kinesiology April 2012—Health Science; Physical Education May 2012—Athletic Training 15 LiveText Training (Snapshot, cont.) Developmental User Training April 2012—Speech Language Pathology June 2012—Human Services Program Coordinators (Review: Part I & Part II); Secondary Ed/ Ed Leadership; Child Development/Family Living; Elementary Education July 2012—Consumer Sciences; Interior Design September 2012—Program Coordinators LiveText report generation training October 2012—Interior Design Program Coordinators LiveText report generation training June 2012—New Student Teaching Supervisor August 2012—Student Teaching Supervisors 16 Recommendations & Lessons Learned Gain faculty buy-in early in the process; solicit faculty input in the selection of data management systems Leadership—develop a leadership team that meets regularly Consistency—the critical nature of a dedicated position; full-time & fully trained BEFORE meeting with faculty; plan ahead before implementing Cross-train another person in the critical actions of the data management system Establish priorities Phase the implementation; slow & steady is more successful than wait & implement or than implement & correct; one or two programs should launch or pilot 17 Recommendations & Lessons Learned, cont. Monitor implementation Provide on-going training—existing faculty, program coordinators, & leaders; new personnel & leaders Provide student “brown bag” lunches; showcase benefits of LiveText & listen to concerns; on-going training Reassure & reinforce Stay positive & exercise a non-reactive countenance 18 Our Next Steps Phasing implementation of the Field Experience Module Supporting the campus-wide implementation of LiveText to assess core curriculum Adopting of Analytics to enhance data analysis Continuing evaluation and refining the assessment system 19
© Copyright 2024 ExpyDoc