PDF poster - Université de Fribourg

Stakeholders and public involvement in river management :
Heterogeneous acceptance of participatory processes among Swiss institutions
RESEARCH DESCRIPTION
This research is part of a project funded by the Swiss Federal Office for the Environment and aims to
evaluate the effects of the introduction of federal subsidies for participation in river management.
In a Swiss setting where direct democracy implies that a reasonable level of project acceptance is
a necessary element of project progression, public participation becomes a more important goal.
This poster introduces the results of a survey exploring how public officers responsible of river
management at the cantonal level understand participation.
Nora Buletti*, Stephan Utz**, Olivier Ejderyan*, Olivier Graefe*, Stuart Lane***, Emmanuel Reynard**
*Department of Geosciences, University of Fribourg
** Institute of Geography and Sustainability, University of Lausanne
*** Institute of Earth Surface Dynamics, University of Lausanne
WHAT ARE THE ISSUES AT STAKE ?
•To what extent do participatory processes make river management more effective ?
Issues raised around a river management project :
submitted by experts / evoked by the public
•How can we evaluate the success of participatory processes taking into account different perspectives ?
BS
TG
BL
JU
ZH
AG
AR
SO
LU
BE
OW
SZ
GL
NW
UR
FR
AI
SG
ZG
NE
No data
Canton
Municipalies
Canton and municipalies
Corporaons
GR
VD
GE
R3
TI
VS
INSTITUTIONAL CONTEXT
Submied by experts
80
River management is a cantonal (regional)
responsibility, under the supervision
(and co-funding) of the State (a Confederation).
Cantonal authorities often represent the
contracting authority and also provide the participatory process supervision. In some cantons,
this role is given to the municipalities and the
canton supervise the projects.
Polical support
Evoked by the public
80
60
RESULTS / FINDINGS
50
Transparency of
decision-making
process
40
20
30
20
10
0
Project objecves
Land use
Leisure acvies
/ access to the river
Project costs
Participatory techniques
Public information session
FIRST PHASE OF THE RESEARCH PROJECT
Working group
Information sent to all households
OBJECTIVES
Workshops
•Understand how participatory processes are incorporated into river management practice in the Swiss
context
•Analyze the actual practice concerning participation in river management in the different Swiss
cantons
•Clarify the modalities of participatory processes implementation
Website information
Environment
protecon
Rules of the
parcipatory process
•Cantonal authorities involved in river management view and
adopt participatory processes heterogeneously; this influences
the practice of participative processes such that they are very
different in every Canton
•The appreciation of participatory processes is less related to
an authority’s recognition of the importance of participation
and more to specific local experience
•How project owners consider ‘participation’ influences how
they consider socio-technical controversies, and the place that
emerging controversies take in the participatory process
Public debate
Other; visit of the construction site, exposition about the project
Public involvement
Conflicts
idenficaon
Addional benefits
Informaon
Legal obligaon
Different considerations of participation
•Participation restraint to institutions
•Information as participation
•Stakeholders’ participation
•Participation as a democratic principle
•Project improvement through participation
Social network
RESEARCH QUESTIONS
•How do the different cantonal institutions implement and incorporate participatory processes in river
management projects?
AND
•Which characteristics of participatory processes related to projects of river management
can be identified in the actual Swiss context?
METHODOLOGY
Survey with a standardized questionnaire administered to cantonal supervisors in river management.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Standardized
qualitative interview
guideline
DATA COLLECTION
22 interviews
(total population
N=26)
Transcriptions
Coding with Nvivo
Thematic content
analysis
DATA PROCESSING AND ANALYSIS
Avoid opposions
40
Datas: Interviews 2013-2014
Base map : FSO
Choice of population
and sampling
Improvement of the project
60
70
% cantons
CONTRACTING AUTHORITIES
Acceptance of the project
100 %
90
SH
Motivations to implement participatory processes
Bryman, A. (2012). Social Research Methods, 4th Edition. New York: Oxford University Press.
Callon, M., Lascoumes, P. et Barthe, Y. (2001). Agir dans un monde incertain. Essai sur la démocratie technique. Paris: Seuil.
Ejderyan, O. (2009). Une renaturation en béton! Comprendre la participation et la nature dans la renaturation de cours d’eau suisses au regard d’une théorie de la pratique. Zürich : Schriftenreihne Humangeographie 24.
Fiorino, D. J. (1990). Citizen Participation and Environmental Risk - a Survey of Institutional Mechanisms. Science Technology & Human Values, 15(2), 226-243.
Hostmann, M. (2005). Decision support for river rehabilitation. Zurich: Swiss federal Institute of Technology.
Lane, S., Odoni, N., Landström, C., Whatmore, S.J., Ward, N. and Bradley, S. (2011) Doing flood risk science differently: an experiment in radical scientific method. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 36(1) : 15-36.
Parkins, J.R. et Mitchell, R.E. (2005). Public Participation as Public Debate: A Deliberative Turn in Natural Resource Management. Society and Natural Resources, 18, 529–540.
Tsouvalis, J. et Waterton, C. (2012). Building ‘participation’ upon critique: The Loweswater Care Project, Cambria, UK. Environmental Modelling and Software, 36, 111-121.
Zaugg M., Ejderyan O., et Geiser, U. (2004). Normen, Kontext und konkrete Praxis des kantonales Wasserbaus. Zürich : Schriftenreihne Humangeographie 19.
OFEV (20 Januar 2012), Wasser Risiken – Beurteilung Mehrleistungen - Partizipative Planung. Berne : Office fédéral de l’environnement.
Loi fédérale sur l’aménagement du territoire du 22 juin 1979 (LAT) (État au 1er janvier 2014), RS 700.
Loi fédérale sur l’aménagement des cours d’eau du 21 juin 1991 (LACE) (État au 1er janvier 2011), RS 721.100.
CONTACTS FOR FURTHER INFORMATIONS
[email protected] and [email protected]
ESPPACE