Bone marrow stroma: biology and therapeutic exploitation ! Francesco Dazzi ! [email protected] Outline 1. Bone marrow stroma and the physiology of the haemopoietic niche ! 2. The malignant niche: potentials for therapeutic intervention? ! 3. Mesenchymal stromal cells for HSCT complications Bone marrow stroma MSC induce the differentiation of GMP and CMP into macrophages 103 100 104 2.69 100 104 41.3 101 102 103 17 3 10 3 10 2 10 2 100 4 Gr-1 high 29 103 Gr-1 int-low 30.6 102 101 100 101 102 103 57.2 101 102 103 104 100 104 4 14.3 10 102 102 100 25.3 101 102 103 104 101 102 103 0.5 0.0 104 39.3 32.9 100 6.86 100 20.9 101 102 103 0 Gr-1 HIGH C& Gr-1 INT-LOW Gr-1 NEG egr1 100 104 * 4 101 102 103 0 104 CD11b& F4/80& CD115& Relative fold expression 100 20 0 F4/80 CD115 r Gr-1 neg 3.84 100 20 te ND# BM+MSC af 10 ND# Gr-1 int-low 0.732 1 40 P 102 HSC+MSC& 103 40 M 104 CMP+MSC G 103 Gr-1 high 4.7 re 102 CD11b 9.35 fo 101 4 be 100 10 60 P Gr-1 neg 0.419 0 M 101 * 60 G ND# af te r 102 80 C M P ND# Gr-1 int-low 0.254 be fo re Gr-1 high 0.524 MEP+MSC& CD11b 1.2 103 10 20 1.0 54 101 3.17 40 * 1.5 4 103 10 28.9 11.8 100 103 0 5.26 104 C M P 10 52.1 101 Gr-1 neg 27.4 0 103 Relative fold expression 10 10 102 GMP+MSC& CD11b 84.4 36.6 101 101 13 100 10 104 10 101 7.36 100 CMP+MSC& 18 100 104 Relative fold expression 102 r 101 te 100 60 af 33.9 100 101 P 101 * 2.0 M 2 G 10 re 2 2.5 fo 10 80 be 3 P 10 B& M 3 20 G 101 10 36.1 af te r 11.7 104 C M P 2 7.51 be fo re 10 48.5 C M P 3 104 % in CD11b+ 10 31.2 76.2 % in CD11b+ Gr,1& 104 BM+MSC& A& Relative fold expression Sfp1 (PU.1) 6 4 2 MSC-induced macrophages exhibit a ‘tissue healing’ profile M1#markers# Ido Cox2 Marco Il12b Nos2 0.0 **** 1.0 0.5 0.0 **** 1.0 0.5 0.0 1.5 **** **** 1.0 0.5 0.0 Relative fold expression 0.5 1.5 *** 1.5 Relative fold expression *** 1.0 2.0 Relative fold expression Relative fold expression Relative fold expression * 1.5 50 ** 40 30 20 10 0 M2#markers# 20 10 0 ** 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 10 8 6 4 2 0 * 3 2 * 1 0 Relative fold expression 30 2.0 Fizz1 Irf4 Relative fold expression 40 Relative fold expression **** 50 Ccl12 Chia Relative fold expression Relative fold expression Arg-1 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 CD11b+ - BM CD11b+ - BM+MSC CD11b+ - BM+GM-CSF+IL-6 Imatinib produces complete remissions in most CML patients MSC protect CML cells from imatinib via CXCL-12/CXCR4 Vianello et al. Haematologica 2010 AMD3100 sensitises APL to Ara-C. Leukaemia boosts MSC induced myeloid generation Macrophages (CD68+ CD14+ CD206+ CD163+ HLA-DR-) Frequency of live cells 8 6 4 2 0 - + - + - + + - + + - + + - + + hMSC CML sample K562 MDSC (Lin- CD33+ CD11b+ HLA-DR-) Frequency of live cells 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 - + - + - + + - + + - + + - + + hMSC CML sample K562 Conclusions • Bone marrow stroma regulates self-renewal and differentiation of HSC • Niches are different and consist of various components • The bone marrow niches are hijacked by the leukaemia process Mesenchymal stromal cells Bone Cartilage Fat tissue MSC Therapeutic applications Functions Tissue support Tissue homeostasis 3D structure and mechano-transduction Modulation of inflammation Regulation of stem cell renewal Ex-vivo expansion of HSC Treatment of inflammatory conditions Improve tissue repair Manipulate the malignant niche MSC can promote haemopoietic reconstitution Jaganathan, Dazzi, Bonnet Leukemia 2010 The therapeutic effect is not associated with donor cell engraftment The MSC ‘facilitating effect’ does not seem to be related to haemopoietic engraftment ‘MSC’ Stemness Niche activity Immunomodulation Mesenchymal stromal cells exhibit immunosuppressive activities T Cognate antigen Mitogen CD3/CD28 Allogeneic MHC Krampera et al, Blood 2003 MSC have ‘tissue ‘anti-inflammatory’ repair’ activity activity • Renal ischaemia ! • Lung fibrosis ! • Toxic liver injury ! • Stroke ! • Myocardial infarction • Arthritis ! • Multiple sclerosis ! • IBD ! • Sepsis ! • Asthma Aminoacid starvation is the main effector mechanism MSC ARG NOS IDO HDC T cells (HSC?) mTOR? GCN2? Arginine Tryptophan His3dine Cell cycle arrest ? Proliferative response to HY (cpm) The inhibitory effect is not dependent on MHC class I expression 15,000 11,250 7,500 3,750 0 Control MSC 3T3-F442A Krampera et al, Blood 2003 MSC increase survival of aGVHD patients Le Blanc et al, Lancet 2008 Incidence and severity of GVHD after prophylactic administration of MSC BM PBSC MSC + BM/ PBSC aGVHD > II 25% 29% 28% cGVHD lim 42% 22% 40% cGVHD ext 21% 21% 19% Lazarus et al, BBMT 2005 MSC for acute GvHD: preliminary data Adults'' Data' ' !! Total'(n)' Age'(y)' Median'(Range)' Sex' 21' ' 49,2'(25;70)' ' Children' Data' !! Total'(n)' Age'(y)' 16' ' Median'(Range)' 7,3'(1;15)' Sex' ' Male' Female' 17' 4' Male' Female' 7' 9' Disease' ' Disease' ' AML' ALL' MDS' NHL/HL/MM' 6' 3' 2' 7' AML' ALL' MDS' AplasRc'Anemia/Other'Anemias' 7' 1' 1' 3' Others' 3' Others' 4' Number'of'Doses' 1' 2' 3' 4' Dose'(x10^6/Kg)' Mean'(Range)' ' 6' 10' 4' 1' ' 3,6'(1,6;8,1)' Number'of'Doses' 1' 2' 3' 4' Dose'(x10^6/Kg)' Mean'(Range)' ' 2' 3' 7' 4' ' 3,7'(1,7;7,4)' Dazzi and Apperley Overall Outcome Adults Children Adults Children MSC for GVHD: the need for ‘licensing’ Tissue affected by GVHD DC PC 2 T Chemokines 3 4 IFN-γ 1 5 T MSC POSTCAPILLARY VENULE Dazzi & Marelli-Berg, EJI 2008 The efficacy of MSC on GVHD depends on time of infusion Day 0 Day 2 Day 20 Day 30 Polchert et al, EJI 2008 In vivo macrophage depletion impairs MSC therapeutic effect on GvHD Control Clodronate MSC+clodronate MSC 1.0 0.5 time (weeks) 11 10 9. 5 9 8 7. 5 6. 5 6 0.0 5. 5 GvHD score (average) 1.5 MSC Chronic inflammation Acute inflammation Fibrosis iMSC aMSC ‘Licensing’ Alternative ‘licensing’ Th1 M1 Th2 M2 ClinicalImmunosuppression responses to MSC Persistent antigen stimulation Dazzi, Best Practice Haem 2011 Graft-versus-host disease Acute GvHD Chronic GvHD Acute inflammation Alloimmunity Necrotic changes Confined to specific tissues Th1 Chronic inflammation Autoimmunity Fibrosis Multisystemic Th2 Pilot study ! Total of 40 patients over 2 years Grade II (visceral) GvHD • 7 Clinical Centres (KCL-Marsden-ICLSouthampton-RFH-Bristol) • KCL-Imperial for cell manufacturing ! Primary aim of the study: ! Identify a biomarker predictive of response to MSC Responders Non-Responders Transcriptomic profile in peripheral blood monocytes Conclusions • MSC exhibit a potent anti-inflammatory effect ! • Such an effect requires a conducive inflammatory environment ! • Treatment of acute GvHD with MSC results into a significant clinical benefit ! • A stratified approach is likely to produce better results
© Copyright 2024 ExpyDoc