ETH 1112 - MDG Sanitation: Whole Sanitation Chain Program for the poor in Urban and Peri-urban of Amhara Grant Contract No.: FED/2012/300-814 European Union INTERIM NARRATIVE REPORT 2013 January, 2014 Name of the contact person for the Action: Ursula Langkamp/ Manfred Bischofberger, Regional Directors Horn of Africa Signature: ____________ Location: Addis Ababa Date report due: January 31, 2014 1. 1.1. 1.2. 1.3. 1.4. 1.5. 1.6. 1.7. 1.8. 1.9. 2. 2.1. 2.2. 2.3. 2.4. 3. 3.1. 3.2. 3.3. 3.4. 3.5. 4. 5. 6. Table of Content Description .......................................................................................................................... 1 Name of beneficiary of grant contract: ........................................................................................................ 1 Name and title of the Contact person: ......................................................................................................... 1 Name of partners in the Action: ................................................................................................................... 1 Title of the Action: .......................................................................................................................................... 1 Contract number: ............................................................................................................................................. 1 Start date and end date of the reporting period: ......................................................................................... 1 Target country (ies) or region(s): ................................................................................................................... 1 Final beneficiaries &/ or Target groups :..................................................................................................... 2 Country (ies) in which the activities takes place.......................................................................................... 2 Assessment of Implementation of Action Activities ........................................................ 3 Activities and Results ...................................................................................................................................... 3 Sub-Contracts ................................................................................................................................................. 11 Financial Expenditure Summary ................................................................................................................. 12 Action Plan (updated) ................................................................................................................................... 13 Partners and other Co-operation ................................................................................... 15 Partner Relationship Assessment ................................................................................................................ 15 State Relationship Assessment..................................................................................................................... 15 Relationships with other program Actors .................................................................................................. 16 Linkages with other actions.......................................................................................................................... 18 Synergy with former EC Grants under the same call/ target group ..................................................... 18 Challenges faced/ Problems Encountered and measures taken .................................. 18 Visibility of the EU ........................................................................................................... 19 Annexes ............................................................................................................................. 19 - ii - Acronyms BCC BoQ CBO CLTS-H CLUES EC EUR F GAA GTO HH HEW H&S IEC KAP ORDA PHAST KSSC MDGs NGO SLTS SWM ToR ToT VIP WASH WASHCo WHH WSC Behavioral Change Communication Bill of Quantity Community Based Organizations Community Led Total Sanitation and Hygiene Community Led Urban Environmental Sanitation European Commission Euro Female German Agro Action German Toilet Organization Household Health Extension Workers Hygiene and Sanitation Information, Education and Communication Knowledge, Attitude and Practice Organization for Rehabilitation and Development in Amhara Participatory Hygiene and Sanitation Transformation Kebele Sanitation Steering Committee Millennium Development Goals Non-Governmental Organization School Led Total Sanitation Solid Waste Management Terms of Reference Training of Trainers Ventilated Pit Latrine Water, Sanitation and Hygiene Water and Sanitation Committee Welthungerhilfe Whole Sanitation Chain - iii - 1. Description 1.1. Name of beneficiary of grant contract: German Agro Action/ Deutsche Welthungerhilfe e.V. 1.2. Name and title of the Contact person: Ursula Langkamp and Manfred Bischofberger, Regional Directors Horn of Africa 1.3. Name of partners in the Action: Organization for Rehabilitation & Development in Amhara (ORDA) 1.4. Title of the Action: MDG Sanitation: Whole Sanitation Chain Program for the Poor in Urban and Peri-urban of Amhara 1.5. Contract number: FED/2012/300-814 1.6. Start date and end date of the reporting period: December 2012 - December 2013 1.7. Target country (ies) or region(s): Bahir Dar City Administartion in Amhara National Regional State, Ethiopia 1|Page 1.8. Final beneficiaries &/ or Target groups1 : Target groups Number of beneficiaries Direct primary target group ( ultimate beneficiaries) Hygiene and Sanitation Promotion Improved Sanitation facilities and services Safe Water Supply Bio-energy and bio-fertilizer 137,000 women, children and men (27,400 families), in the 17 Target Urban and Peri-urban Kebeles, 60,000 vulnerable women, children and men (12,000 Families) in the 17 Target Urban and Peri-urban Kebeles, 42,500 people (8500 Families) in the 17 Target Urban and Peri-urban Kebeles, 20,000 people (4,000 Families) in the 17 Target Urban and Peri-urban Kebeles, 2,100 people (420 unemployed and marginalized poor HHs), Alternative means of income associated to waste recycling and reusing Direct secondary target groups in terms of capacity building Bahir Dar City Administration Offices Amhara National Regional Bureaus Community groups CBOs Private Sectors Academic and Research institutes Development Agencies Indirect Target group= Total Population in the City Administration 1) Health Office, 2) Water Office, 3) Education Office, 4) Beatification & Sanitation Department, 5) Microenterprise Office, 6) Urban Agriculture Department and 7) Justice and Police Office 1) Health Bureau, 2) Water Bureau, 3) Environmental & Land Administration Agency and 4) Biogas Program 1) 17 Kebele Sanitation Steering Committees, 2) 1 Religious Leaders’ group, 3) 12 WASHCOs & 4) 36 Water Attendants 17 School Clubs and “Edirs” Dream Light, Munich Engineering and the microenterprise groups ARARI & Bahir Dar university SNV, GIZ, and Water-Aid 309,555 people in the target City Administration 1.9. Country (ies) in which the activities takes place Ethiopia Target Groups “are the groups/entities who will be directly positively affected by the project at the project purpose level and “final beneficiaries” are those who will benefits from the project in the long term at the level of the society or sector at large. 1 2|Page 2. Assessment of Implementation of Action Activities 2.1. Activities and Results Result 1.1: Access and use of sanitation facilities by slum dwellers increased from currently <15% to 65% in the target area; Activity 1.1.1/2: Construction/ renovation of communal latrines/ public latrines As a preparatory work, preliminary assessment of slum areas in the city administration has been done by the project team and a total of 67 slum areas are identified. The slum areas lack access to water and sanitation facilities and there is a general poor infrastructure condition. In the slum areas solid and liquid wastes are disposed indiscriminately to the open field. The team identified 27 open solid waste disposal sites in the city administration, where all wastes from nearby households, market areas and institutes are disposed openly. Most drainage systems are also filled up by liquid waste & sewage generated from households, market areas, institutions and industries. 4 public latrines and 15 communal latrines are found to be totally out of function and are locked by the Government due to the related potential health risk. However the ones, which are currently in use, are poorly managed and run down and it is obvious that these facilities are also potentially hazardous to the people living in around. Hence, the project included these facilities in its target to improve their quality, so that they can serve the intended purpose. Additionally, design and bill-of-quantity is prepared for communal and public bio-gas latrines. The design is somehow similar and it will have 10 squats, of which one is designed to be user friendly for disabled persons. The design also included separate urinals and hand washing facility. Demand supply analysis has also been done to determine the size of the digester for public and communal biogas latrines with the help of experts from GIZ. Accordingly, it is decided to reduce the proposed digester size from 80m3 to 40m3 for public bio-gas latrine and from 40m3 to 20m3 for communal latrine. Moreover for renovation of 5 public latrines, level of damage assessment conducted and based on the assessment BOQ and purchasing of construction materials are undertaken. Within the reporting period it was planned to construct/ renovate 17 different communal latrine facilities (Installation of 3 mobile communal eco-san latrines (2 rooms), Construction of 5 new communal VIPLs and Renovation of 9 communal latrines) and 13 different public latrine facilities (Construction of 5 biogas latrines at communal places, Construction of 3 communal eco-san latrines and Renovation of 5 public latrines). Accordingly for renovation of 5 public latrines which need minor and major maintenance, site identification, BOQ and purchasing of construction materials are done in the period. However the actual construction work of sanitation facilities is not yet started and delayed due to persistent challenges the project faced to conduct artisans’ training, which is critical step to embark on the construction work. The first challenge was associated with limited resource person available in the area to give the training. The project, after spending long time in searching for experienced trainer, a team of experienced trainer has been identified in the 3rd quarter of program implementation period. Nevertheless still it was not possible to start the training as of the prior need to secure plot of land for the construction of one communal and one public bio-gas latrines for the practical exercise. The master plan of the city administration is underdevelopment and not yet finalized, as a result, the Municipality couldn’t decide the sites for the construction of one communal and one public bio-gas latrines. Though the project undertaken long and successive discussion with the concerned Government offices it was complex to unleash the problem. The project has a plan to bring the issue to the attention of the sanitation board (comprised of officials from different Government offices) and to get a final solution to the problem related to access to land for the different project activities. This problem, in turn, impounded the construction/ renovation of planned 17 and 13 different communal and public latrine facilities in the reporting period. 3|Page Activity 1.1.3: Construction/ renovation of latrines in public Institutes In the reporting period, it has been planned to construct three different types of latrines in three different public institutes. Accordingly, the construction of one Eco-san and one VIPL has been started in Tis-Abay and Workemla elementary schools respectively. The Eco-san is a one block having eight rooms, while the VIPL is a two block, each having four rooms and the special needs of disables are considered in the designing of both types of latrines. When the two latrines are completed, about 2,675 students and teachers (1292 Female) will get access to improved latrine facility. Preparation has also been started to integrate urban agricultural activities in Tis-Abay school with the eco-san technology. However the construction of one bio-gas latrine is delayed due to the delay artisans training. Activity 1.1.4: Construction/renovation of household sanitation facilities It has been planned to construct/ renovate 880 different household latrines in the reporting period, nevertheless the actual implementation is delayed due to the delay in other associated preliminary activities, such as; delayed implementation of ToT on the CLUES approach and delayed artisans training. Activity 1.1.5: Construction of communal shower facilities Within the program period it was planned to Construct 3 Communal shower facilities at selected sites in the slum areas; however the actual construction work of communal shower facilities is not yet started and delayed due to the delay of preliminary activities as mentioned above. Activity 1.1.6: Grey water treatment plant Activity 1.1.8: Construction and proper management of drainage system Activity 1.1.7: Construction of drainage system in Hospital Result 1.2: 75% of the target population (102,750 people) in the slums and Peri-urban areas of Bahir Dar city administration adopted and started to practice minimum hygiene standards Activity 1.2.1: CLTS-H Ignition follow-up with PHAST in the community Activity 1.2.2: SLTS ignition and follow-up in the schools For the intended school hygiene and sanitation intervention, a total of 17 schools (all up to grade 8) have been selected in discussion with the City Administration Education Office. Consequently, in the reporting period, 15 school clubs have been established in 9 target Kebeles, namely; Woramit, Shum Ambo, Belay Zeleke, Meshenti, Workemilla, Woreb, Hiddar 11, Tiss Abay and Addis Alem. Following the establishment of the clubs, training on SLTS approach facilitation has been organized and conducted in two sessions each run for three days. In the training selected school WSAH club representatives from each school, 27 students (13 Girls) and 41 teachers (21 Female), participated. The next step will be igniting improved hygiene and sanitation behavior in each school through SLTS approach and continuous support to bring the desired change and sustaining the results. Activity 1.2.3: Promotion in the religious institutes Ethiopians have close historical ties to religion. Religious tradition is reflected in the day-to-day life style of the people. Besides, the religious institutes though are visited by many worshipers almost every day; mostly they don’t have the latrine facility accommodating the needs of all of these visitors. As a result, people tend to use the open field around the institutes. This condition presents a huge gap in achieving total sanitation and remained as a challenge for many years. Due to these reasons, religious institutes are one of the targets of this program. Additionally, religious leaders are influential and are selected as a key entry point to change the hygiene and sanitation behavior of their followers. 4|Page To this effect, a workshop has been organized to religious leaders selected from the two most dominant religions (Orthodox and Muslim). In the workshop 45 participants (31 from Orthodox and 14 from Muslim) have partook. In the two days’ workshop schedule different relevant topics have been discussed. These include: general introduction to WASH; impact of poor hygiene and sanitation in Ethiopia; latrine technology options and challenges in selecting latrine technology options; religious leaders’ roles, tasks and linkages with other sectors; identification of existing WASH problems in religious institutions and their followers; identification of important quotes about WASH from holy bible and Qurean and how to prepare WASH action plan. At the end of the workshop, religious leaders have prepared action plan to improve the WASH situation of the institutes and their followers. The workshop facilitation was supported by PHAST tool kits. Following the action planning, 9 latrines constructed in 7 churches and 2 mosques with an estimated cost of 255,000.00 Birr and are providing service for 12,000 people. The program staff has also been doing supportive supervision and rendering technical support by traveling to 24 churches and 13 mosques. Religious leaders’ bi-annual review meeting at ORDA has also been conducted in the reporting period. In the meeting 35 religious leaders were participated. The meeting created the opportunity to discuss the sanitation and hygiene situation in religious institutes. In the meeting hygiene and sanitation achievements in the religious institutes were reported and experience exchange visit made between the institutes. In addition, the challenges faced in the construction and facilitation of sanitation facilities in the institutes have been discussed. The meeting was concluded by preparing an action plan for future interventions. Activity 1.2.4: Conduct promotion campaigns October 15 of each year is a day assigned to celebrate global hand washing day. Using this opportunity, the program conducted a hand washing campaign on 15th of October 2013 at Bahir-Dar town in Dilchibo elementary school. The campaign was organized in collaboration with the health and education bureaus and health and education offices of the city administration and other NGOs working in the area. Due to this campaign, a total of 4,545 (2675F) people reached through edutainment awareness creation methods, including; drama, song, poem, and distribution of IEC/ BCC materials. The celebration is believed to be a good method as a mass awareness creation campaign on proper hand washing reaching many target people at a time. However, public sanitation campaign planned to be conducted on November 19/2013 was postponed due to overlapping of the program with the National City week, which was hosted by Bahir Dar City. Activity 1.2.5: Preparation and dissemination of IEC/ BCC materials To support the hand washing campaign, discussed above in activity 1.2.4, the program prepared and disseminated 500 T-Shirts, 800 Leaflets, 4 Banners and 200 Posters holding key messages related to proper hand washing and other hygiene and sanitation issues. Result 1.3: Increased coverage of safe water from presently 28% to 59% in target urban slums and Peri-urban towns Activity 1.3.1: Hydro-geological feasibility study & environmental impact assessment Hydrogeological feasibility study together with environmental impact assessment has been conducted by the Amhara Regional State Water and Energy Bureau and sites identified for two deep wells and five hand-dug wells. The deep well sites are identified in Addis Alem and Zenzelema Kebeles, while the sites for five hand-dug wells identified 1 in Workemla, 3 in Woreb and 1 in Addis Alem. Activity 1.3.2: Construction/rehabilitation of large water schemes Tis Abay is among the satellite towns of Bahir Dar City Administration. The kebele is partly supplied by an existing spring scheme constructed 25 years ago. The system is old and currently not 5|Page functioning properly, though the source is sufficient (4l/s). Hence, it is planned to reconstruct the system and supply the existing and new villages with a different system. In the reporting period, therefore, the design and bill of quantity (BOQ) is done and the construction work will start in the first months of the next program implementation period. Result 2.1: Enhanced capacity of the local government and the partner to coordinate, support, plan, implement, monitor and sustain similar projects in the future; Activity 2.1.1: Familiarization & Monitoring Program Familiarization workshop At the starting phase of the program, familiarization and program launching workshop has been held at Bahir Dar City for three days between 28th and 30th of March and more than 70 representatives from the community, government & partners participated. The workshop was facilitated by an external consultant and a mix of methods, enclosing: presentations, plenary discussion, group work, role play & field visits were employed. In the workshop, description of the program, including; background, approaches, stakeholders, components, structures, action plan have been made to the participants. Additionally, different research findings and good experiences related to: a) Hygiene & sanitation at Bahir Dar, b) Bahir Dar water quality characteristics, c) Waste management linking to whole sanitation chain concept and d) Waste management linking to whole sanitation chain segments have been presented. The workshop has also been accompanied by field visit made to the target Kebeles. The focus of the visit was on: assessing the available Policies, Strategies, and Protocols & Frameworks; analyzing stakeholders & their roles; the existing public private partnership in whole sanitation chain; and Water & Waste Management System in the city administration. As a result of the workshop, important stakeholders familiarized to the proposed program, common understanding among the stakeholders on the program created and enhanced; the list of stakeholders with defined roles and responsibilities identified; and an insight on specific WASH problem of the city administration created. Finally, the program’s five years action plan has been approved by all stakeholders. Establishing Sanitation Board from the local Government stakeholders and organize biannual meeting A Sanitation Board is the main decision making body having an overall control for the program. It comprises the City Mayor, line-office heads (education, cooperatives, health, women & children, hotel & tourism, mines & energy, social affairs, environment) and executive director of ORDA. The board is organized and conducted its first meeting in the second quarter of program implementation period. In the meeting a total of 10 participants participated. The board redefined the members of the sanitation board, the technical committee and KSSC with their specific roles and responsibilities. In this meeting, though, the board members were decided to meet on quarterly basis at least during the startup phase; they couldn’t get time to meet again mainly because they are overloaded with many responsibilities as Government Officials. Establish Technical Committee from the Local Government: The technical committee is the general information source for the sanitation board & considers critical & burning issues. The main tasks of the technical committee are monitoring program progress based on the designated plan, method, process and goal and provide trainings to organized groups, private sectors, health extension workers, KSSCs and other groups in the community. Hence in the second quarter of program implementation time, a Technical Committee encompassing technical experts from key stakeholders’ offices: water & sewerage, city health, environment, urban 6|Page agriculture, mines and energy, sanitation and beautification, small & micro enterprise, cooperative development and program manager of ORDA has been established. The Committee then conducted three quarterly meetings, while the first was done at the time of the establishment and it was focused on defining the roles and responsibilities of the Technical Committee. To this effect, the decision made by the Sanitation Board was shared to members of the Technical Committee and the roles and responsibilities of the Committee discussed in depth. Additionally, the Program’s action plan for the year 2013 was presented and discussed. During the second meeting, after presentation and discussion of the program performance in the previous quarter the Committee members were out to visit the achievements in one of the religious institute (Selamber Mosque at Sefeneselam Kebele). In the institute they have visited the newly constructed latrine and hand washing facilities. The Committee members appreciated the start-up achievements of the program and they agreed to further support the program to hasten the implementation of physical activities. In the third meeting again they together discussed the program progress for the previous quarter and identified delay in the program implementation and related challenges. One of the identified challenges was a decreased involvement of the Sanitation Board as reflected by lack of time for the planned quarterly meetings and unable to solve the challenges the program is facing in relation to poor coordination among Government sector offices. The Committee recommended calling a special meeting with the Sanitation Board and to discuss the problem and defining the way forward. Activity 2.1.2 Training ToT on Community Led Urban Environmental Sanitation (CLUES) approaches to Government & Program Staffs and HEWs: CLUES approach is proposed as a main approach for the facilitation and implementation of the whole Sanitation Chain Program for the Poor in Urban and Peri–Urban of Amhara because it is exclusively designed for programs implemented for the people living in slum areas. CLUES approach is selected to the Amhara MDG sanitation program for its double qualities: (i) empower households and communities participate in the planning, implementation and operation of improved services & (ii) can achieve sustainable environmental sanitation services. However, CLUES approach is literally new for the partners and the country and hence potential expertise was lacking. At the same time, skill in CLUES approach is the key enabling environment to successfully apply it in the actual implementation phase. In order to fill this gap, ToT on CLUES was organized for program and government staff to provide knowledge and skill on CLUES components and processes so that they are able to handle further facilitation of the approach to the main actors. Hence, CLUES ToT has been conducted at Dangila Woreda Adugna hotel for five days from September 16-20/2013 and a total of 21 (3 woman) program and partner staffs have been participated. The training was given by two trainers from German Toilet Organization. After the ToT it is realized that the CLUES approach needs 9-12 months to complete the community planning process on the ground and then implementation of the community action plan will continue. Therefore, the program office planned to purely apply CLUES only in program urban Kebeles but the Peri-urban Kebeles will be treated with other approach by mixing with some important tools from CLUES approach. Besides, as the next step, to cascade the CLUES approach to 100 HEWs the CLUES approach training manual was translated in to Amharic by the project staff and contextualized to fit to the culture and structure of the program area. Nevertheless, the actual training couldn’t be conducted in the planned time frame, mainly due to lack of time by the HEWs to take the training as they are overburdened by different responsibilities assigned by the Government. 7|Page ToT on Whole Sanitation Chain Approach technology options to Government & Program staffs and HEWs: A ToT on Whole Sanitation Chain approach technology options has been organized in the second quarter of program implementation period to government and program staffs. The main purpose of the training was to enable Urban and Peri-urban communities and partners and stakeholders in the target areas to plan and implement cost effective environmental sanitation services that employ appropriate technologies suited to user needs and integrate the different components of sanitation system (toilet, storage, transport, treatment and disposal or re-use). Hence, Whole Sanitation Chain Approach technology options ToT has been conducted at Dangila Woreda Adugna hotel for five days from December 2-6/2013 and a total of 21 (5 woman) program and Government and partner staffs have been participated. The training was given by two trainers from German Toilet Organization/GTO/. Cascading the same training to 100 HEWs was the next plan; as a result, the program staff translated the manual in to Amharic and made it ready for the training. However the training was postponed to the next program implementation period as HEWs couldn’t be available due to overstretched responsibility assigned by the Government on them. Activity 2.1.3: Experience sharing (in country & abroad) In order to learn from other similar projects, in the reporting period it was planned to organize an experience sharing visit to 25 Government and program staff to potential places/successful organizations engaged on urban sanitation projects in the country, however due to the delayed organization of the whole sanitation chain training the planned experience sharing visit was postponed to next year. Activity 2.1.4: Material Provision to government offices Provision of motorbikes for three government offices; Within the program period it was planned to procure and provide three Motorbikes for the three relevant offices (City Health, Water and Sewerage and Sanitation and Beautification) for use in program monitoring during and after implementation. Accordingly, the procurement process for three Yamaha motor bicycles was started, but due to shortage of stock in the company the distribution was not possible by the period and postponed for next project implementation time. Provision of computer with printer for three government offices; Within the program period it was planned to procure and provide three computers with printer sets for three relevant offices (City Health, Water and Sewerage and Sanitation and Beautification) to support the development of WASH database system in the city administration. Thus, three desktop computers with printer sets were purchased and distributed to the three relevant offices (City Health, Water and Sewerage and Sanitation and Beautification). Activity 2.1.5: WASH database software development and training for Government staff Result 2.2: Target community groups are capacitated and engaged in income generating schemes related to waste recycling and the reuse and management of sanitation facilities; Activity 2.2.1: Community Conference & Familiarization Community conference and program familiarization has been conducted within the 17 intervention kebeles. This is the first contact with the community and a total of 6,039 (2,519 women) participated in the conference. The main aims of the conference were: to familiarize the entire community concerning the program activities and its implementation approach; and to select the Kebele Sanitation Steering Committee (KSSC) and artisans based on pre-set criteria with active participation of the community; 8|Page Accordingly a total of 172 KSSC and 30 artesian have been selected by the community based on preset criteria. The conference was led by the program staff and members of the technical committee. The composition of the KSSC were from kebele executives (kebele leader, manager and child, women and youth affair), religious leaders, health extension workers, school leaders, school director, CBO representative and natural leaders from the community. Table 1: List of intervention kebeles, number of people participated on the community conference and number of artesian selected from each kebele. S.No. Name of Kebele 1 Tis Abay 2 Zegie 3 Meshenti 4 Weramit 5 Werqemila 6 Woreb 7 Addis Alem 8 Zenzelima 9 Ura 10 Tanna 11 Shimibit 12 Ginibot 20 13 Hidar 11 14 Sefene Selam 15 Belay Zeleke 16 Gish Abay 17 Shum Abo Total Total attendants Male attendants Female attendants 181 679 256 785 216 324 326 387 301 306 334 432 221 209 436 384 262 6,039 108 402 189 483 118 278 244 202 194 191 224 241 101 93 157 109 186 3,520 73 277 67 302 98 46 82 185 107 115 110 191 120 116 279 275 76 2,519 No of KSSC selected 10 10 10 11 10 10 10 10 10 10 11 10 10 10 10 10 10 172 No of Artisan selected 2 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 30 In the conference, the community reflected the following points: Most peri-urban kebeles especially Meshenti, Zegie and Tis Abay didn’t have master plan and they strongly advise us to consult the concerning bodies before construction of some schemes and it shows us the community internalize and accept the project very well. All kebeles conference participants appreciate the program intervention activities and its implementation approaches to alleviate the sanitation and hygiene problem of Bahir-Dar town at large and they agree to actively participate on it. In most cases the government officials were promised to conduct different development activities but they didn’t do anything. Therefore, the community recommended the program office to start its activities on time. They showed us their commitment in different ways to actively participate during program implementation. They appreciated the selection criteria for KSSC and artesian but they put their threat that there will be turnover of KSSC members because most of the government officials representatives especially school teachers, DAs and health extension workers may not stay in the area for long period of time because of transferring from place to place but they are convinced when they listen to the relevance of main sectors to implement the program intervention. 9|Page Activity 2.2.2: Organize & train micro-entrepreneur Groups Activity 2.2.3: Material support to the micro-enterprise groups Activity 2.2.4: Construct biogas connected cafeteria & kitchen & equipping them Activity 2.2.5: Construct biogas kitchen & equipping them Activity 2.2.6: Organize and train artisans group A total of 30 (1 Female) Artisans were selected from all the 17 intervention Kebeles and preparation has been made to give training on construction methods and management practices of biogas plants & latrines. However the training is delayed and postponed to the next program implementation period due to long time spent on searching for an experienced trainer and difficulty to secure plot of land for the construction of communal and public bio-gas latrines for demonstration purpose. Activity 2.2.7: Organize and train community groups/ CBOs Kebele Sanitation Steering Committee (KSSCs) establishment & awareness creation Kebele Sanitation Steering Committees (KSSCs), each having 10 members established in each the 17 target Kebeles during the community conference, are key actors in facilitating the project implementation at grass root level. To this effect, trainings on CLUES and Whole Sanitation Chain have been planned for them in the reporting period; however the trainings were postponed to the next implementation period due to tight time schedule that the Kebele leaders have in their Government duty. Activity 2.2.8: Policy & law awareness workshop for KSSC Activity 2.2.9: Experience exchange for KSSC Activity 2.2.10: Material Support to WASHCos Result 2.3: Participation of the private sector at different stages of the whole sanitation chain is achieved through strengthened public private partnership. Result 3.1: Sanitation is put high on the list of development priorities Activity 3.1.1: Media Panel discussion among Regional Government officials and scholars On 30th of Decemeber, one panel discussion has been organized and conducted for 3 hours on the topic of identifying the main causes for poor solid waste handling and management practices by the community in Bahir Dar City Administration and define the responsibility of the stakeholders. In the discussion, a total of 21 (5 Female) participants from the City Administration Offices, ORDA head office and Program Staffs, Community Based Organizations and private companies engaged in solid waste management, Amhara Mass Media Agency Radio and TV program journalists and Urban Kebele Administration representatives were present. At the start of the panel discussion, ORDA Water Resources Development Program Director, Ato Gugusa made a short introductory speech and handover the floor to journalists came from Amhara Mass Media Agency, FM Bahir Dar Radio and Amhara Television Program to play the facilitation role. During the panel discussion, studies conducted at Bahir Dar town on solid waste management presented by Ato Getachew, the experience of Dream Light PLC and Green Vision Association. Additionally, the result of the live public conference on solid waste management on Radio compiled and presented for the panelists. At the end of the discussion, common understanding created among participants on the existence of poor solid waste handling and management practice in general in the city administration and stakeholders identified to take and play different roles to improve the situation. The discussion will be summarized and aired for the public for 10-15 minutes in Amhara TV. 10 | P a g e Activity 3.1.2: Awareness creation and policy advocacy through public media conferences Again on the same topic, solid waste handling and management in Bahir Dar city administration, a live participatory public discussion has been made through Bahir Dar FM Radio on December 23/2013. The discussion was facilitated by the Amhara Mass Media Agency Bahir Dar FM Radio journalists. At the start of the live discussion, the journalist explained to the public the objective of the program and put forward questions, related to: • Community members’ perception related to the current solid waste management; • Why is individuals, HHs, community members practice such unsafe solid waste handling and management? Why do we need to cleanse the street every time? • What is the effect of unsafe solid waste disposal on individuals, HHs and community members? • What should be done/ change in the community at Individual level, at HHs, and at Community level, and the role of Government and Private Sectors to bring the change. Scholars from Bahir Dar City including; Municipality Office Beautification and Sanitation Core Process Owner, City Health Office, Dream Light PLC and MDG Sanitation Program Office staffs were present in the studio to give professional opinions and answers for the discussion questions raised from community members through telephone. In general, 24 community members participated in the live radio discussion and forwarded their opinions and questions to the scholars and it was estimated that about 4,000 people have attended the live radio discussion. The main points raised in the discussion was the bad habit that most of the residents have in disposing solid waste indiscriminately (eg. chewed sugar cane, used plastic bags, e.t.c) and as well as the low capacity that the Municipality has in systematically handling and managing the dry waste produced in the city administration. Participants mentioned the weakness of the Municipality in timely emptying dry waste collection dust tankers and limited number of dust bins available along the road side. Participants also mentioned that the poor solid waste handling and management practice in the city administration poses a big threat on the health of all the dwellers and expressed their willingness to participate in any initiative planned to improve the situation. Of course they also appreciated the already established system to collect dry waste from the houses which was first introduced by Dream light PLC. Activity 3.1.3: Amending the hygiene and sanitation proclamation Result 3.2: National policy and law related to Environmental pollution are implemented in the target area. 2.2. Sub-Contracts The following item has been purchased by contracting out following the right procedure: Table 2: List of contract services provided during the reporting period Name of Contractor ITAB Consult Service PLC. 11 | P a g e Contract for Consultancy service for MDG Sanitation Program Baseline survey Value € 11,504.26 Award Procedure Followed Public Tender using National News letters Date 08/10/2013 2.3. Financial Expenditure Summary Since the start of the project 7% of the total budget (€ 233,508.24) has been utilized. However the expenditure when compared to the first installment, it didn’t reach the threshold amount to request the second installment. Please see the detail of the expenditure compiled in the main budget headings in the table below. Table 3: Financial expenditure per main budget headings as at end of December, 2013 Description Total Budget Expenditures as of December 31, 2013 Remaining Budget Budget Consumption in % 1. Human Resources 504,780.00 37,319.52 467,460.48 7.39% 2. Travel 18,900.00 2,932.57 15,967.43 15.52% 3. Equipment and supplies 71,115.00 51,691.19 19,423.81 72.69% 4. Local office 86,820.00 20,337.80 66,482.20 23.43% 5. Other costs, services 81,680.00 8,492.23 73,187.77 10.40% 6. Other 2,367,142.00 98,517.16 2,268,624.84 4.16% 7. Subtotal direct eligible costs of the Action (1-6) 3,130,437.00 219,290.47 2,911,146.53 7.01% 10. Administrative costs 202,963.00 14,217.78 188,745.22 7.01% 11. Total eligible costs (7+10) 3,333,400.00 233,508.24 3,099,891.76 7.01% Professional staffs in the partner office (ORDA) have been recruited and all are actively taking on part in the program execution. They also get professional support both in the finance and program execution by well experienced experts from Welthungerhilfe. For example, in the program period, orientation workshop has been organized on finance administration by two finance advisors from Welthungerhilfe and all the program staff participated. The main focus of the discussion was the rules and regulation of the European Union and Welthungerhilfe. Hence, the institutional capacity to implement this program and proper fund management is well secured. 12 | P a g e 2.4. Action Plan (updated) Table 4: Action plan for the year 2014 Activity Description Date in 2014 Annual program review & planning workshop Training on whole sanitation chain (technology options)/approach to health extension workers Training on CLUES approach to health extension workers In country experience sharing visit Government and project staff Provision of liquid waste transportation lorry to the municipality(purchasing is on Process ) Provision of motorbikes for three government offices Purchasing 2 motorbikes Purchasing GPS hand set KSSC establishment & awareness creation February-14 February-14 Purchasing Digital camera Training on CLUES approaches for KSSC February-14 March-14 Training on technology options on Whole sanitation chain approach for private sectors Annual joint monitoring Expenditure verification - Internal audits WASH database development & training Training on PME of urban sanitation program to Government staffs Training to CBO committees on sustainable management of sanitation facilities Training to Government & program staffs on water safety plans Experience sharing outside the country Government staff Training to organized groups on safe and sustainable management of sanitation facilities and the waste. Purchase and provision of two pelletizing machines for two groups; Purchase and provision of small motorized lorries for 2 groups Awareness creation workshop on policy and law for government stakeholders Training & support for public institutes on safe & sustainable management of sanitation facilities (Church, Mosques, etc) Policy & law awareness creation workshop for sanitation steering committees Training of 12 WASHCos Training and support to 36 water attendants Maintenance tool kit provision to 12 WASHCos 13 | P a g e February-14 February-14 Responsibility GAA, ORDA & City Admi. GAA, ORDA PO staffs & City Admi. Experts GAA, ORDA PO staffs & City Admi. Experts GAA, ORDA & City Admi. March-14 GAA and ORDA March-14 ORDA PO and HO February-14 February-14 February-14 April-14 April-14 May-14 July-14 July-14 July-14 August-14 August-14 August-14 ORDA PO and HO ORDA PO and HO GAA, ORDA PO staffs & City Admi. Experts ORDA PO and HO GAA, ORDA PO staffs & City Admi. Experts GAA and ORDA PO staffs GAA, ORDA & City Admi. GAA and ORDA GAA, ORDA PO staffs & City Admi. Experts GAA, ORDA PO staffs & City Admi. Experts GAA, ORDA PO staffs & City Admi. Experts GAA, ORDA PO staffs & City Admi. Experts GAA, ORDA PO staffs & City Admi. Experts GAA, ORDA PO staffs & City Admi. Experts September-14 ORDA PO and HO September-14 ORDA PO and HO September-14 GAA, ORDA PO staffs & City Admi. Experts October-14 GAA, ORDA PO staffs & City Admi. Experts October-14 GAA, ORDA PO staffs & City Admi. Experts November-14 Novemeber-14 December-14 GAA, ORDA PO staffs & City Admi. Experts GAA and ORDA PO staffs GAA and ORDA PO staffs Activity Description Visibility actions: Sign boards, pamphlets and Impregnated metal sheets construction of sanitation facilities Date in 2014 Responsibility Jan - Dec/2014 GAA and ORDA PO staffs School club establishment, SLTS training and support the promotion activities January to December/2014 January to December/2014 January to December/2014 GAA, ORDA PO staffs & City Admi. Experts GAA, ORDA PO staffs & City Admi. Experts GAA, ORDA PO staffs & City Admi. Experts Construction of 10 biogas kitchens & material support Construction of 5 biogas cafeteria & material support January to November/2014 January to November/2015 GAA, ORDA PO staffs & City Admi. Experts GAA, ORDA PO staffs & City Admi. Experts Construction and management of water schemes January to September/2014 GAA, ORDA PO staffs & City Admi. Experts Panel discussions by stakeholders and 10 minutes TV presentation Media (radio) live participatory public conferences January, April, July and October 2014 January, April, July and October 2014 GAA, ORDA PO staffs & City Admi. Experts GAA, ORDA PO staffs & City Admi. Experts Media (radio) presentation for half an hour January, April, July and October 2014 January, April, July and October 2014 March, June and October/2014 March, June, September and December/2014 May and Nov/2014 GAA, ORDA PO staffs & City Admi. Experts GAA, ORDA PO staffs & City Admi. Experts GAA and ORDA PO staffs Hygiene & Sanitation Promotion Media presentation on television for half an hour IEC/ BCC material production and distribution Establish technical committee from the local Government and organize quarterly meeting; Expenditure verification - External audits Establishing sanitation board from the local Government stakeholders and organize biannual meeting Biannual review meetings for religious institutes Quarterly review meeting among Kebele sanitation steering committees Training and support to 5 groups on urban agriculture Training on small and micro entrepreneurship for all members of the organized groups 14 | P a g e May and Nov/2014 GAA, ORDA PO staffs & City Admi. Experts GAA and ORDA GAA, ORDA PO staffs & City Admi. Experts May and Nov/2014 May, August and November/2014 September and November/2014 ORDA PO staffs ORDA PO staffs September and November/2014 GAA, ORDA PO staffs & City Admi. Experts GAA, ORDA PO staffs & City Admi. Experts 3. Partners and other Co-operation 3.1. Partner Relationship Assessment The partnership in this program is between German Agro Action (GAA) and Organization for Rehabilitation & Development in Amhara (ORDA). GAA and ORDA have long-term partnership since 1983 started with a relief support in the region. Later in 1997, the cooperation has grown up to long term and development projects. The thematic areas of intervention have been on food security, rural development and water & sanitation with an overall budget of EUR 17,714,551 Euro and the share of EC donation takes more than 34% excluding those grants happening after MDG: (a) EU Relief Projects 2000 – 2004 with EUR 561,218 & In kind 22,149MT, (b) Capacity Building for Food Security Project Tehuledere Habru with EUR 779,372, (c) Relief to Rehabilitation Ambassel & Habru with EUR 840,000 (d) MDG WatSan Program in Rural Amhara with EUR 3,850,000 and (e) MDG Sanitation: Whole Sanitation Chain Program for the Poor in Urban and Peri –Urban of Amhara with EUR 3.33 million. The partnership between GAA & ORDA is ever becoming reliable & strategic; stronger in volume and wider in area coverage and diversity of development themes in the region. The responsibilities of both in the relationship are clearly indicated in their Agreement of Allocations fitting to each specific projects and are followed accordingly and are being amended while need arises. The focus of GAA role is to give advice & support to ORDA at all levels like organizational development, human resource management, Planning Monitoring & Evaluation, technical support, mainstreaming new approaches & tools and developing a good practice systems. Therefore, the relationship between GAA & ORDA can be measured as close, productive & effective in management & implementation of projects. The good partnership relationship was also being reflected in the achievements of this program in the reporting period. As being the first program implementation year, both parties had been given due attention for the proper establishment of the program. GAA and ORDA together selected key project staffs, orientation of the new project staff on the program done by GAA experts, GAA facilitated for the timely procurement of program vehicles through its head quarter and ORDA executives have played vital role in liaising the program with Government sector offices. It was also a period where close collaboration between the two parties were observed in trying to solve challenges and problems whenever appeared in the course of program implementation time. To site an example; getting an experienced trainer to give ToT on CLUES and whole sanitation chain approach was a big challenge for ORDA as the approaches were very new in the country. Hence, GAA stepped in and looked for appropriate professionals from abroad through its international network. As a result, GAA found two experts from GTO organization and brought them for both trainings covering their cost. This was a major step in unlocking the project to progress. To date, both parties are enjoying the established transparency between them through clear and timely exchange of information related to the project. 3.2. State Relationship Assessment The project target area, Bahir Dar, the capital city of Amhara National Regional State is one of the most tourist attraction places found in the Northern part of the country. It is as well the capital city of Amhara National Regional State, where all regional offices are situated. Thus, the target area has both political and economic significance for the region and for the country in general. The project office and ORDA head office are also found in the central city and this situation created a good opportunity for the project to easily access and involve the regional Government bureaus in the project. The regional Government expressed its interest and showed high level commitment in the project through allocating 15% matching fund. 15 | P a g e Furthermore, the program has strategically integrated relevant Governmental City Administration Offices in the management & implementation of the program through organizing them to form a Sanitation Board and a Technical Committee. A Sanitation Board is the main decision making body having an overall control of the program. It comprises the City Mayor, line-office heads (education, cooperatives, health, women & children, hotel & tourism, mines & energy, social affairs, environment) and executive director of ORDA. While, a Technical Committee encompasses technical experts from key stakeholders’ offices: water & sewerage, city health, environment, urban agriculture, mines and energy, sanitation and beautification, small & micro enterprise, cooperative development and program manager of ORDA. The technical committee is the general information source for the sanitation board & meets every quarter. The main tasks of the technical committee is monitoring program progress based on the designated plan, method, process and goal and provide trainings to organized groups, private sectors, health extension workers, KSSCs and other groups in the community. Performing this activity accelerates program progress, allows the program to easily trace challenges and problems, and offers timely solutions. However, the support from the sanitation board was not to the level expected at the outset of the program. The low involvement of the sanitation board members were mainly due to high turnover of officials (members) and they were overburdened with many Government responsibilities. 3.3. Relationships with other program Actors • Other program actors Other program actors involved are: (a) CBOs/ Kebele Sanitation Steering Committee at Kebele Level, (b) Religious institutes at City level, (c) the Water & Sanitation Committees (WASHCos) at community level; (d) School Clubs at school level, (e) Micro Enterprise Groups at community level; (f) Artisans at Community level, (g) Private sector & business groups, (h) Academic & Research Institutes, and (I) Development Agencies. (a) Kebele Sanitation Steering Committee: Kebele Sanitation Steering Committee (KSSC) is a key actor in the program and is established in all intervention Kebeles during Kebele conferences and familiarization workshop with the presence of Program and City Government staffs and Kebele level government officials and with strong participation of Kebele people. Each KSSC has 10 members: Kebele executives (Kebele leader, manager and child, women and youth affair), religious leaders, and health extension workers head, school leaders, school director, CBO representative and natural leaders from the community. KSSC is responsible to participate & lead planning, implementation & management of any activity according to the CLUES process. Different awareness creation and capacity development tasks are organized to capacitate KSSCs in order them to accomplish their roles and responsibilities properly. The KSSCs are expected to efficiently & effectively initiate, plan, implement, monitor & sustain projects after all these capacity buildings. (b) Religious Institutes: Ethiopians have close historical ties to religion and religious tradition is reflected in the day-to-day life style of the people. Hence, religious institutes are selected as a key entry points to change the hygiene and sanitation behavior of their followers. To this effect, a workshop has been organized to religious leaders selected from the two most dominant religions (Orthodox and Muslim). Representatives of Orthodox Church and Islam religions attend the workshop which are strongly involving themselves in the promotion of hygiene and sanitation in their own orientation and education principles towards hygiene and sanitation. They do have a separate action plan and program of promotion at Community level. They prepare training manuals organized from bible and Quran articles on the matter and also design monitoring tools and review them together with ORDA project office and City health office hygiene and sanitation experts. They integrate them with their spiritual educations and implement them during the 16 | P a g e sermon at parish and Mosque. And the two institutes produce regular reports on the results on biannual review meeting time. (c) Water & Sanitation Committee (WASHCos): WASHCos are established for hand dug well schemes. WASHCos are KSSCs in case of deep well schemes in some Kebeles of the program areas. However, WASHCos for hand dug wells are under KSSC supervision in their respective Kebeles. WASHCOs are the main responsible body to plan, manage, facilitate, implement and finalize WASH sub-projects. They consist of five to seven members who are democratically elected by the respective community. The Water & Sanitation Committee receives three trainings: 1) Project implementation/management 2) CLTS and PHAST and 3) Scheme sustainability. In order the WASHCOs to perform better either KSSC or a related body need a clear support role for the WASHCOs in implementation as well operation and sustainable management of schemes. (d) School H&S Clubs: School clubs are important communicators for messages on Sanitation, Hygiene, and environment. Evidences have shown that school clubs are efficient in bringing changes within the school and in the public generally. In the reporting period, 15 school clubs established. Club committee members nominated from among students, teachers and administration staff. Gender combination is 50/50. School Led Total Sanitation (SLTS) training is given to the clubs and they will further be supported with promotion materials. Additionally, Agricultural demonstration sites will be established where school eco-sans constructed. The committees promote hygiene and sanitation in the school community with SLTS approach. The approach helps them outreach to villages after school. They are well integrated in the program & participate in planning, joint monitoring, review & reporting. (e) Micro-Entrepreneur Groups: for sustainable management of sanitation facilities through entrepreneurship in the whole sanitation chain value approach, groups are organized. There will be a competitive approach to selection among groups as a key tool to sustain results. The organized groups will get training before and during program implementation. Some training is of a type common to all groups and others are specific and specialized according to the engagement. One of the training given by the period for organized groups was on Whole Sanitation Chain technology options. During the training 4 (2F) organized groups engaged on solid waste management participated. In the next project implementation period, trainings on safe & sustainable management of sanitation facilities and wastes (concept on whole sanitation chain) & small & micro entrepreneurship will be given to all members of all groups. Training on urban agriculture will be provided for all members of 18 groups engaged in urban agriculture. Management members of all groups will take training on business administration. Operation and management training on pelletizing machine is specific to the two groups involved in it. 10 members from each group will receive the training. Besides to training, Experience sharing will be organized to Dream Light, company and “Egnan new mayet” micro-enterprise in Bahir Dar which are running organized businesses on technology options connected to whole sanitation chain approach. The experience sharing may extend to Dire Dawa city administration, experienced in a similar theme. ORDA will facilitate the trip. (f) Artisans: 30 Poor people who have the talent and the capacity to engage in construction work elected by and from the community based on pre-defined criteria will be trained and form a legally recognized group to engage in the bio-gas latrine construction works of the project. They will formally taking contract agreements with KSSC and ORDA for construction under the supervision of technical staffs of the project. They will further be supported through refresher training and materials, so that they can develop the necessary capacity and skill to employ themselves in similar jobs and maintenance works. 17 | P a g e (g) Private sectors & business groups (Dream Light and Munich Engineering): They are identified as potential private sectors engaged in sanitation related business in the project target area and included in the project. They are targets for capacity building and experience exchange visit so as to strengthen private sector involvement in the sanitation sector. They will also support the project in providing practical training on dry waste collection & pellet production (Dream Light) and production and supply of bio-gas stoves (Munich Engineering), (h) Academic and Research Institutes (ARARI & Bahir Dar university): These are the identified institutes to partner for researches and studies planned to undertake in the project. They also leverage scholars to take part in policy dialogue and panel discussion. They are targets for capacity building activities & review meetings. (i) Development Agencies (SNV, GIZ, Water-Aid): the program also partner with other development agencies engaged in similar projects in the target area. This is mainly to facilitate CSO forums, avoid duplication of effort, Knowledge & experience sharing and networking. They are also targets for experience exchange visits & review meetings. 3.4. Linkages with other actions A household biogas program has been running in the target area since 2007 as part of the national pilot program. The project created synergy with this program and integrated a revolving fund system in order to reach the poor households in the target area. The Government program is planned in a way that the government covers 50% of the construction cost and the remaining 50% should be covered by the user immediately. Each biogas plant costs about €565 and hence,poor people are not benefited from the program as they were not able to cover their share. Hence, the project planned to inject a revolving fund and integrate with the national biogas program to reach the poor. Nevertheless, the system yet not established as there was no clear plan from the Government side in the last year. 3.5. Synergy with former EC Grants under the same call/ target group The program will adopt experiences, documents, skills & methods of Arsi Negele WASH Program and MDG WatSan Amhara Program. Strategic experience sharing & exchange visits are planned to create synergies, enhance and replicate best-practices from both programs. At WHH RO level, all partner organizations in the water, sanitation and hygiene sector are networked. It is expected to create a community of practice which mutually profits from each other’s experiences, results and practices. 4. Challenges faced/ Problems Encountered and measures taken • Lack of clear development plan of Bahir Dar city administration: It is known that Bahir Dar is among the fast growing cities in the country and according to the new master plan of the city administration, which is developed by the Urban Planning Bureau, there will be no slum areas in the city in the next five year and the current main bus station will be changed to recreational place. However, this contradicts with the Master plan, which is found in the municipality, and referred at the time of project designing. This contradiction, therefore, is creating confusion in site selection for sanitation facility construction even for demonstration for Artisans training. The program office, therefore, planned to have discussion meeting involving the Urban Planning Bureau and the Municipality. • Limited expert pool in the area of communal and public biogas construction in the local area: Lack of experienced professional to give training on communal and public biogas construction in the local area compelled the program to delay the training and the actual construction work. The project announced made a public announcement of the bid and now found one experienced expert signed training contract agreement. However, the training is still 18 | P a g e unaccomplished due to difficulty in securing plot of land for communal and public biogas construction sites for demonstration as part of the training. Lack of experienced resource person to give ToT of CLUES and Whole Sanitation Chain Approaches: During the 2nd and 3rd quarter of project implementation period, the project made repeated effort to look for professional trainers who are familiar with the approaches; however, it ended up in vain. This was mainly because of the newness of the approaches for the country. Thus, German Agro Action communicated GTO, a German Based NGO known for having ample experience on the approach and requested for support. As a result, two experts from GTO given the training to the project and Government staffs during the last months of the reporting period. Tight schedule of KSSSCs and Health Extension Workers in their routine work: KSSSCs and HEWs are included in the project as implementers and facilitators of the project at grass root level and as means to sustain project results. Hence, they are targets for CLUES and Whole Sanitation Chain trainings. However they couldn’t get time to take these trainings, though repeated trial made by the project to arrange a schedule with the municipality and the city administration health office claiming for being busy in their routine works. This also poses big threat in future project implementation. The project planned to bring the issue to the agendas of Sanitation Board and get an option how to actively involve them in the project. Due to this problem cascading of CLUES and Whole Sanitation Chain trainings postponed to next project implementation year. • • Low involvement of the sanitation board in the project: The sanitation board is comprised of heads of important Government sector offices of the city administration. These people are at the same time having many responsibilities in their Government position and this situation impedes them from involving actively in the project. On top of this there is high turnover in the Government offices, which in turn decreases the interest and commitment expected from them. • 5. Visibility of the EU EU visibility in the program implementation is ensured by various public-related components. EC logos have been printed & placed on numerous stickers, leaflets, banners, T-Shirts, posters and sign boards. In addition, all program reports, minutes & documents have the EU logo displayed on every single page (mostly in the header). Awareness and application of EU visibility is therefore given great attention in this program. During implementation, the engraving of EU logo on the schemes itself will be systematically pursued. 6. Annexes • Program pictures 19 | P a g e
© Copyright 2025 ExpyDoc