A project funded by the European Union and implemented by EASA AATIP ASEAN Air Transport Integration Project in partnership with EUROCONTROL, UKCAA and DGAC France FUA experiences and the application of Enhanced FUA ICAO CMAC Workshop Beijing 19-21 November 2014 Anders Hallgren ATM Expert EU-AATIP Project Ensuring a 'Flexible Use of Airspace'…. Presentation structure: 2 The AATIP project FUA, the history, European experiences Rationale How FUA is applied Benefits Dynamic Management of Airspace Overall objective To contribute towards sustainable ASEAN economic growth and the integration of the ASEAN Economic Community (AEC), through the development of the civil air transport sector. AATIP - Inception Ph A t 3 Specific objectives To facilitate the development of institutional frameworks and to strengthen institutional capacities within ASEAN to achieve a safe, secure and sustainable ASAM. AATIP - Inception Ph A t 4 Expected results Preparation of the ASEAN Single Aviation Market (ASAM) and its external links. Progress towards ASEAN institutional development and capacity building. A series of protocols, mechanisms and working procedures. AATIP - Inception Ph A t 5 Overview of Europe’s Traffic Dense Route Network 1000 airports 30000 aircraft per day 1000 control sectors 80% of traffic is European internal 50% of traffic flies less than 600km Military requirements Traffic bottlenecks (account for 80% of en-route delay) 6 7 Why we need flexibility in the European airspace ? 37% ofMore European airspace isflights somehow segregated than 33. 00 civil day… How to reconcile 37% and a9.000.000? 8 ATM System Improvements Strategy Strategic Planning of Airspace 1. Route network Development National Re-Sectorisation 2. Controller Workload ATC procedures System Support Better Use and Management of Airspace 3. RVSM Area Navigation Flexible Use of Airspace 9 Increased Capacity Reduced Delays Improved Flight Profiles How to satisfy all the stakeholders’ requirements ? Since 1996 through … FLEXIBLE USE OF AIRSPACE CONCEPT 10 The basis of the FUA concept 11 • Airspace no longer designated as civil or military airspace, a continuum • Airspace used flexibly on a day to day basis necessary airspace segregation only of temporary nature; • Ensure more efficient sharing through joint civil/military strategic planning and pre-tactical airspace allocation: Airspace Management Cells (AMCs) Fundamental principle of FUA Airspace should not be designated as either pure civil or military airspace, but rather be considered as a continuum in which all user requirements have to be accommodated to the extent possible. 12 Non-FUA vs. FUA P D R 13 PROHIBITED DANGER RESTRICTED = = = P PROHIBITED TRA CROSSING POSSIBLE TEMPORARY WHEN ACTIVE / RELEASED RESERVED AREA AS SOON AS ACTIVITY STOPS TSA TSA TEMPORARY RELEASED AS SOON AS SEGREGATED ACTIVITY STOPS AREA Through Civil / Military Coordination … ASM Level 1 Strategic Level Definition and review of national airspace policy and organisation, establishment of pre‐ determined airspace structures ASM Level 2 Pre‐tactical Level Day‐to day airspace allocation according to user requirements ASM Level 3 Tactical Level Real‐time use of airspace allowing a safe separation between civil and military aircraft 14 High-Level Civil / Military Airspace Policy Body Joint Civil / Military Cell (AMC) Appropriate Civil / Military ATS Units CDR Categorisation CDR 1 CDR 2 CDR 3 Permanently plannable during the times published in AIP Expected to be available most of the time Plannable same way as permanent ATS routes Non‐permanently plannable Daily allocated as negotiated Plannable only in accordance with daily AUP/EAUP Part of pre‐defined routing scenario Not Plannable Usable upon ATC instructions only as short notice routing 15 ASM Notification Process Mil airspace users advise on requirement; National Airspace Use Plan (AUP); Put together by the Network Manager, becomes European Airspace Use Plan (EAUP); Used by Aircraft Operators in improving flight trajectory. 16 Centralised Airspace Data Function (CADF) Part of the Network Manager in Brussels CADF Combines National AUPs into the European Airspace Use Plan (EAUP) EAUP contains list of available CDRs throughout all ECAC Region 17 Regulatory aspect in regard to FUA Concept • FUA Concept described • Processes & procedures at all three ASM Levels • It is the reference document for FUA Regulation EUROCONTROL FUA Guidance Documents Regulatory aspect in regard to FUA Concept - EUROCONTROL • provides details of procedures and requirements for the application of FUA • addresses essential interoperability requirements • a means of compliance Regulatory aspect in regard to FUA Concept Compilation of existing (best) practices EUROCONTROL FUA Reference Material FUA SES Regulatory Framework SPECIFICATION FUA REGULATION Existing FUA Provisions FUA Specification seen as an interface FUA Concept Benefits? 21 Assessment of FUA Operations ECONOMY REALISED 1 week day By filed FPLs on Available CDRs 30.833 NM on 6.086 flights Fuel : 385 T 22 CO2 Emissions : 315.000 € 1.216 T Benefits 340.000 tons CO2/year 108.000 tons fuel/year 87 million Euro/year 23 Assessment of FUA Operations POTENTIAL ECONOMY NOT UTILISED 1 week day By not planning on available CDRs 10.321 NM on 2.784 flights Fuel : 129 T 24 CO2 Emissions : 105.780 € 407 T ASM/ATFCM Process Airspace not used optimally The Problem Impact on performance of Network After CRAM – Level III Work load intense Opportunities not used Network perspective 25 ASM Improvements Initiative Exploit airspace availability Rolling UUP Procedure 2&3 EAW CDR network Consistent application of FUA TRA/TSA clarification CBA designation CDR inconsistencies Safe, efficient and accurate data flows B2B NOP portal CIAM ASM Support Systems 26 Enhanced ASM Process AIM Static Dynamic frozen D‐1 picture periodically updated Excessive Booking Difficult Accurate Booking User Friendly Level II Processes on Day of Ops 27 Enhanced ASM Processes Improved CDR Network System support Notification Process Towards 2017 Military Liaison Officer Better Processes Procedure 3 28 Improved CDR Network Improving airspace utilisation 29 Tracks far from optimum - - LQSA-LOWW 51NM difference between flown track and direct distance. No better airway links published or available. ...and what is actually flown... (daily) Support to Civ/Mil ASM coordination Military Liaison Officers (MILO) as part of the network management function ► enhance the civil-military ASM coordination process at the European network level The MILO ► proposes identified alternative ASM solutions ► collects and harmonizes national information with regard to major military exercises and activities, ► an entry point for all civil-military issues 31 System Support to Civ/Mil ASM coordination CIAM ► ASM support system Enables interface between airspace managers and the Network Manager Airspace Data Repository ► Enables users to keep up-to-date with airspace status data 32 • System to support airspace planning and allocation, CIV – MIL coordination, common situational awareness and collection of statistical ASM data 2012 ASM/ATFCM Process D‐1 Time Axis > 12.00 (Summer) (D) 16.00 16.00‐ 17.00 Draft UUP 1 17.15> >08.00 08.00 Coordin. with other Users UUP 1 Rerouting Proposals to AOs Notificati on Earlier Coordin. area with AMC deactivati on React (CGH, CNL or new FPL) Draft UUP 2 08.00‐ 09.00 09.00 09.15 09.15> UUP 2 CFMU ENV Update Rerouting Proposals to AOs Notificati on Coordination with AMC FPLs 17.15 CFMU ENV Update Coordination with AMC Earlier Coordin. area with AMC deactivati on 17.00 Network and Local assessments Network and Local assessments (D) Final airspace Request Coordin. with other Users CFMU ENV Database Update AO Requests fine‐tuning 15.00‐ 16.00 CRAM/ eAUP Coordination Final CDR Request FMP Users AUP Network impact assessment NM Airspace Draft AUP 15.00 Coordination with Users Requests fine‐tuning 12.00‐ 13.00‐ 14.00 13.00 14.00 Coordination with Users AMCs 12.00 D React (CGH, CNL or new FPL) 33 2012 ASM/ATFCM Process D‐1 Time Axis > 12.00 (Summer) (D) 16.00 16.00‐ 17.00 Draft UUP 1 >08.00 08.00 Coordin. with other Users UUP 1 Rerouting Proposals to AOs Earlier Coordin. area with AMC deactivati on React (CGH, CNL or new FPL) Draft UUP 2 08.00‐ 09.00 09.00 09.15 09.15> UUP 2 CFMU ENV Update Rerouting Proposals to AOs Notificati on Coordination with AMC FPLs 17.15> Notificati on Coordination with AMC Earlier Coordin. area with AMC deactivati on 17.15 CFMU ENV Update Coordination Network impact assessment 17.00 Network and Local assessments Network and Local assessments (D) Final airspace Request Coordin. with other Users CFMU ENV Database Update AO Requests fine‐tuning 15.00‐ 16.00 CRAM Coordination Final CDR Request FMP Users AUP Network impact assessment NM Airspace Draft AUP 15.00 Coordination with Users Requests fine‐tuning 12.00‐ 13.00‐ 14.00 13.00 14.00 Coordination with Users AMCs 12.00 D React (CGH, CNL or new FPL) 34 2012 ASM/ATFCM Process D‐1 Time Axis > 12.00 (Summer) (D) 16.00 Draft UUP 1 17.15> >08.00 08.00 Coordin. with other Users CFMU ENV Update Rerouting Proposals to AOs Notificati on Earlier Coordin. area with AMC deactivati on React (CGH, CNL or new FPL) Draft UUP 2 08.00‐ 09.00 09.00 09.15 09.15> UUP 2 CFMU ENV Update Rerouting Proposals to AOs Notificati on Coordination with AMC Coordination with AMC FPLs 17.15 UUP 1 CFMU ENV Database Update Earlier Coordin. area with AMC deactivati on FPLs 17.00 Network and Local assessments CRAM 16.00‐ 17.00 Network and Local assessments (D) Final airspace Request Coordin. with other Users CFMU ENV Database Update AO Requests fine‐tuning 15.00‐ 16.00 CRAM Coordination Final CDR Request FMP Users AUP Network impact assessment NM Airspace Draft AUP 15.00 Coordination with Users Requests fine‐tuning 12.00‐ 13.00‐ 14.00 13.00 14.00 Coordination with Users AMCs 12.00 D React (CGH, CNL or new FPL) 35 2012 ASM/ATFCM Process D‐1 Time Axis > 12.00 (Summer) (D) 16.00 16.00‐ 17.00 Draft UUP 1 17.15> >08.00 08.00 Coordin. with other Users UUP 1 UUP 1 Rerouting Proposals to AOs Notificati on Earlier Coordin. area with AMC deactivati on React (CGH, CNL or new FPL) Draft UUP 2 08.00‐ 09.00 09.00 09.15 09.15> UUP 2 CFMU ENV Update UUP 2 Rerouting Proposals to AOs Notificati on Coordination with AMC FPLs 17.15 CFMU ENV Update Coordination with AMC Earlier Coordin. area with AMC deactivati on 17.00 Network and Local assessments Network and Local assessments (D) Final airspace Request Coordin. with other Users CFMU ENV Database Update AO Requests fine‐tuning 15.00‐ 16.00 CRAM Coordination Final CDR Request FMP Users AUP Network impact assessment NM Airspace Draft AUP 15.00 Coordination with Users Requests fine‐tuning 12.00‐ 13.00‐ 14.00 13.00 14.00 Coordination with Users AMCs 12.00 D React (CGH, CNL or new FPL) 36 2012 ASM/ATFCM Process D‐1 Time Axis > 12.00 (Summer) (D) Draft AUP AUP Coordin. with other Users 16.00 16.00‐ 17.00 Draft UUP 1 17.00 17.15 17.15> >08.00 08.00 Coordin. with other Users UUP 1 CFMU ENV Update Rerouting Proposals to AOs Notificati on Notification AO (D) Final airspace Request Earlier Coordin. area with AMC deactivati on FPLs Earlier Coordin. area with AMC deactivati on React (CGH, CNL or new FPL) 09.00 09.15 09.15> UUP 2 CFMU ENV Update Rerouting Proposals to AOs Notificati on Notification Coordination with AMC Users Requests fine‐tuning Coordination with AMC Airspace Draft UUP 2 08.00‐ 09.00 Network and Local assessments Network and Local assessments CFMU ENV Database Update Final CDR Request FMP 15.00‐ 16.00 CRAM Coordination Network impact assessment NM 15.00 Coordination with Users Requests fine‐tuning 12.00‐ 13.00‐ 14.00 13.00 14.00 Coordination with Users AMCs 12.00 D React (CGH, CNL or new FPL) 37 2012 ASM/ATFCM Process D‐1 Time Axis > 12.00 (Summer) (D) 16.00 16.00‐ 17.00 Draft UUP 1 17.15> >08.00 08.00 Coordin. with other Users UUP 1 Rerouting Proposals to AOs Notificati on Rerouting Proposals to AOs Earlier Coordin. area with AMC deactivati on React (CGH, CNL or new FPL) Draft UUP 2 08.00‐ 09.00 09.00 09.15 09.15> UUP 2 CFMU ENV Update Rerouting Proposals to AOs Notificati on Rerouting Proposals to AOs Coordination with AMC FPLs 17.15 CFMU ENV Update Coordination with AMC Earlier Coordin. area with AMC deactivati on 17.00 Network and Local assessments Network and Local assessments (D) Final airspace Request Coordin. with other Users CFMU ENV Database Update AO Requests fine‐tuning 15.00‐ 16.00 CRAM Coordination Final CDR Request FMP Users AUP Network impact assessment NM Airspace Draft AUP 15.00 Coordination with Users Requests fine‐tuning 12.00‐ 13.00‐ 14.00 13.00 14.00 Coordination with Users AMCs 12.00 D React (CGH, CNL or new FPL) 38 2012 ASM/ATFCM Process D‐1 Time Axis > 12.00 (Summer) (D) 16.00 16.00‐ 17.00 Draft UUP 1 17.15> >08.00 08.00 Coordin. with other Users UUP 1 Rerouting Proposals to AOs Notificati on Earlier Coordin. area with AMC deactivati on React (CGH, CNL or new FPL) React (CGH, CNL or new FPL) Draft UUP 2 08.00‐ 09.00 09.00 09.15 09.15> UUP 2 CFMU ENV Update Rerouting Proposals to AOs Notificati on Coordination with AMC FPLs 17.15 CFMU ENV Update Coordination with AMC Earlier Coordin. area with AMC deactivati on 17.00 Network and Local assessments Network and Local assessments (D) Final airspace Request Coordin. with other Users CFMU ENV Database Update AO Requests fine‐tuning 15.00‐ 16.00 CRAM Coordination Final CDR Request FMP Users AUP Network impact assessment NM Airspace Draft AUP 15.00 Coordination with Users Requests fine‐tuning 12.00‐ 13.00‐ 14.00 13.00 14.00 Coordination with Users AMCs 12.00 D React (CGH, CNL or new FPL) React (CGH, CNL or new FPL) 39 Commitment AMCs/ NM (CFMU) CIV ANSPs ACTORS Aircraft Operators Mil ANSPs Mil Airspace Users 40 Enhanced ASM/ATFCM Process Flight efficiency Predictability Benefits Environmental Optimised capacity 41 A project funded by the European Union and implemented by EASA AATIP ASEAN Air Transport Integration Project in partnership with EUROCONTROL, UKCAA and DGAC France Thank you.
© Copyright 2024 ExpyDoc
