6
THE PINNACLE SCHOOL
Recognised by the Directorate of Education,NCT of
Delhi (school ID No. 7925-282)
Affiliaterl with C.B.S.E., Delhi t:ide Affilintion No.2730411 (School Code No. 6583et
lo fearn is ttt lltttl
Date :24th January, 2014
To,
All parents of
The Pinnacle School.
Dear Parents,
Due to alleged complaints and misrepresentation by one of our ex-teacher
namely Mrs. Bindu Khanna who was suspended in April 2010 and
subsequently terminated from the school on account of misbehaviour,
misconduct and anti-school activities, the Director of Education, GNCT of
Delhi had purportedly withdrawn the recognition of the schpol with effect
from 01 -04-2014 vide an impugned Order dated 02-01-2014. The school
challenged the purported order of the Director of Education by filing a Writ
Petition No. 506 of 2014 in the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi and the Hon'ble
Judge Mr. Manmohan had admitted the writ and after hearing the case, he
has granted status-quo with regard to the school vide Order dated
22-01-2014. The functioning of the school shall continue as earlier. This is
for your kind information Please.
We sincerely thank all parents for their kind support and co-operation, We
further assure you that the Management will take all necessary legal steps
to protect the smooth functioning of the school.
With warm regards,
G.il4'l^b
Princidal
ffi
Principal
rHE PINNACLE
gcHgql
O-etocf, Panchsheel Enclave
New Delhi- 1 10 017
Encl": llu^'Jl"
INI"J
G"l
QrJ''
22- ot * 2otk
D-BLOCK, PANCHSHEEL ENCLAVE, NEW DELHI ILOOLT
Telephone:011264909521011'26498609Fax:01141749202
E-mail:'thepinnacleschoolO gmail.com Web : www.thepinnacleschool'com
38
$-
*
trN TIIE HIGH COURT' OF DELX{{ AT NtrW DELHI
+-
w.P.(c) s06120r4
TFIE MANACINC CONTMITTEE OII
""' Petitionels
TI-m PINNACLE SCHOOL &
Through: Mr. Arvind Nigarn, Seniol Advocate
with Mr. Mohit Sharma, Advocate'
ANR'
i
t
VCI'SUS
GOVERI{MENT OF NCT OF DLEHI & ANR. ...,. Respondents
Through: Ms. Zubeda Begum, Advocate with
Ml. V.K. Tandon and Mr. Amiet Andlay,
Advocates.
CORAIVI:
HOTTBLE MII.. JUSTICE. MANV{OFNAN
ORDtrR.
oh
(.-'r
ZZ.0t.Z0t4
Allowed, subject to just exceptiotls'
Accordingly, present application stands disposed of'
W.P.(C) 506/2014 & CM Appl. 974/2014
present writ petition has been filecl challenging the order dated
02nd
January, 2014 passed, by the Director of Education as well as for quashing of
the reporl dated 29th November, 2013 given by a Committee constituted by
an order of the Minister of Education.
w P (c) s06/20t4
page
I of 3
the
petitioner submits that
Mr. Arvind Nigam, learned senior counsel for
is in violation of principle of
impugned order datecl 02nd Janu ary,2014,
has not even been given a hearing
natural justice inasmuch as the petitioner
states that the impugned
prior to passing of the impugned order. He further
passed by a Director of Education'
order dated 02nd Janu ary,2014 has been
Decembet,2013.
who had been relieved from his post on 3 1't
#
'
i nr
ry--1-^l^ D^^'iffi
UnSel fOf
loo'
'
ontheotherhand,Ms.ZubedaBegum,learrredStandingco
present writ petition
Government of NCT of Delhi, states that
remedy
maintainabie as an alternate efficacious
is
is not
available with the
and Rule 58 of the Delhi
petitioner by way of an appeal under Section 4(7)
School Education
Act,1973
r
order hasractually
Ms. Zubeda Begum further states that the impugned
on 31't Decetnber' 2013' but has
been passed by the Directol of Education
been dispatched on 02"d lanuary,2014'
petiiioner submits
In rejoinder, Mr. Nigam, learned senior counsel fbr
as an alternate remedy is only a
that the pres'ent writ petition is maintainable
fo*,
rule of prudence and not a statutory prohibition'
is of the view that
Having heard learned counsel for parties, this Court
senior counsel for
there is merit in the argument advanced by learned
petitioner.
this courl directs
However, as the scope of an appeal is much Iarget,
under the Delhi School
the petitioner to fi1e a statutory appeal as directed
weeks'
Education Act, 1973 within a period of four
w P (c) s06/2014
page 2 of 3
' , 1^--^^ +L^ equities' tiil the app eal is hearcl and disposed
However; to baiance the ^^1
status qr-io with regarcl to the schooi
of by the Hon',ble Lieutenant Govemor,
as of todaY shall continue'
fl*:
apply for impleadment in the
to
liber-ty
given
is
l(hanna
Ms. Bindu
The said
Flon'ble Lieutenant Governor'
proceeclings to be filed before the
to saY, the
accordance with law' Needless
application would be decided in
are left open:
rights and contentions of all the parties
petition and apPlication stand
With the aforesaid observations' present
disposed of.
C)rder dasti.
JAI{UARY 22,,2014
js
W 'n,
#.r
': 1r'
"
^^Lr
lXs*'.'
{'y/
!,
fl
Y}
poge
w.P.(c) s06/2014
,! )
)
ra uJ
© Copyright 2024 ExpyDoc
