www.arconolly.com.au Friday 21 March 2014 Insurance A Daily Bulletin listing Decisions of Superior Courts of Australia Search Engine Click here to access our search engine facility to search legal issues, case names, courts and judges. Simply type in a keyword or phrase and all relevant cases that we have reported in Benchmark since its inception in June 2007 will be available with links to each case. Executive Summary (1 minute read) Enders v Erbas & Associates Pty Ltd (NSWCA) - defamation - circulation of workplace email defences of qualified privilege upheld - appeal dismissed Dimitrovski v Australian Executor Trustees Ltd (NSWCA) - mortgages - estoppel - challenge to validity of mortgage precluded by judgment for possession - appeal dismissed Waterfall v Antony (VSCA) - accident compensation - motorcyclist injured in collision with motor vehicle towing caravan - driver negligent - contributory negligence 50% - appeal allowed Mutton v Baker (VSCA) - pleadings - allegation of arrest by police - dismissal of malicious prosecution claim - leave to appeal refused Summaries with links (5 minute read) Enders v Erbas & Associates Pty Ltd [2014] NSWCA 70 Court of Appeal of New South Wales Ward & Leeming JJA; Tobias AJA Defamation - defences - applicant sued respondents for defamation arising out of email and extract from office diary circulated to employees of first respondent - applicant pleaded five Page 2 www.arconolly.com.au imputations which were conceded to be defamatory of her if conveyed - primary judge found three out of five pleaded imputations conveyed but upheld defences of common law and statutory qualified privilege as well as defence of triviality - primary judge declined to find malice which would otherwise have destroyed the defences of qualified privilege - s30(3)(h) Defamation Act 2005 (NSW) - knowledge of falsity of imputations - test of malice - held: applicant did not discharge onus to establish that second respondent knew that email could convey false imputations - applicant had not established primary judge erred in finding that defence of common law qualified privilege or statutory qualified privilege was defeated on basis of malice - defences upheld - leave to appeal granted - appeal dismissed. Enders Dimitrovski v Australian Executor Trustees Ltd [2014] NSWCA 68 Court of Appeal of New South Wales Meagher & Emmett JJA; Bergin CJ in Eq Mortgages - estoppel - guarantor of loan sought leave to appeal from order dismissing claims made in equity proceedings against lender on basis they were precluded by judgment for possession granted in lender’s favour - judgment for possession not opposed - primary judge concluded there would be fundamental inconsistency if guarantor allowed to challenge the mortgage when judgment for possession was predicated on validity of mortgage - primary judge also held judgment for possession precluded a challenge in separate proceedings as mortgage’s validity - guarantor contended primary judge erred in finding that correlative effect of continuation of judgment for possession justified dismissal of claims - public policy and illegality - pleading deficiencies - ss11, 12, 13 Powers of Attorney Act 2003 (NSW) - Anshun estoppel - held: res judicata and estoppel not “trumped” by public policy in the Act - judge correct to dismiss claims made in equity proceedings - appeal dismissed. Dimitrovski Waterfall v Antony [2014] VSCA 44 Court of Appeal of Victoria Redlich, Whelan & Santamaria JJA Accident compensation - appellant motorcyclist injured in WA when motorcycle collided with motor vehicle which was towing caravan driven by respondent - collision occurred when driver attempted to make right hand turn while motorcyclist was attempting to overtake driver’s vehicle - driver denied negligence or alleged that there was contributory negligence on motorcyclist’s part primary judge found driver liable but assessed 60% contributory negligence - motorcyclist appealed against finding of contributory negligence - ss5B, 5C, 5D & 5K Civil Liability Act 2002 (WA) - held: motorcyclist negligent - Court disagreed with judge’s assessment that motorcyclist’s negligence was significantly higher than that of driver - motorcyclist was slightly less negligent than judge assessed his negligence - parties’ departure from requisite standard of care of same order - motorcyclist’s negligence assessed at 50% - appeal allowed. Waterfall Page 3 www.arconolly.com.au Mutton v Baker [2014] VSCA 43 Court of Appeal of Victoria Whelan & Santamaria JJA Pleadings - malicious prosecution - injurious falsehood - applicant and first respondent were medical practitioners who entered agreement which permitted applicant to use respondent’s premises in consideration of payment of part of applicant’s fees to first respondent - dispute arose concerning payments - respondent complained to police - applicant alleged he was arrested before being released without charge - applicant claimed damages from respondents for malicious prosecution and injurious falsehood - primary judge struck out claim in malicious prosecution applicant sought leave to appeal - O 23 County Court Civil Procedure Rules 2008 (Vic) - ss62, 63 & 64 Civil Procedure Act 2010 (Vic) - foundation of tort for malicious prosecution - held: proper for primary judge to dismiss claim for malicious prosecution - applicant did not allege processes of a court had been used to arrest or prosecute him - if it had not been proper to dismiss claim, pleading of claim for malicious prosecution should have been struck out with leave to replead on grounds it was embarrassing and likely to prejudice fair trial of proceeding - application dismissed. Mutton The Power of the Dog by Rudyard Kipling There is sorrow enough in the natural way From men and women to fill our day; And when we are certain of sorrow in store, Why do we always arrange for more? Brothers and Sisters, I bid you beware Of giving your heart to a dog to tear. Buy a pup and your money will buy Love unflinching that cannot lie-Perfect passion and worship fed By a kick in the ribs or a pat on the head. Nevertheless it is hardly fair To risk your heart for a dog to tear. When the fourteen years which Nature permits Are closing in asthma, or tumour, or fits, And the vet's unspoken prescription runs To lethal chambers or loaded guns, Then you will find--it's your own affair-But ... you've given your heart to a dog to tear. Page 4 www.arconolly.com.au When the body that lived at your single will, With its whimper of welcome, is stilled (how still!). When the spirit that answered your every mood Is gone--wherever it goes--for good, You will discover how much you care, And will give your heart to a dog to tear. We've sorrow enough in the natural way, When it comes to burying Christian clay. Our loves are not given, but only lent, At compound interest of cent per cent. Though it is not always the case, I believe, That the longer we've kept 'em, the more do we grieve: For, when debts are payable, right or wrong, A short-time loan is as bad as a long-So why in--Heaven (before we are there) Should we give our hearts to a dog to tear? Rudyard Kipling Click Here to access our Benchmark Search Engine
© Copyright 2024 ExpyDoc