Sorting of Waste Wood by NIR Imaging Techniques Enrico Pigorsch, Gerhard Gärtner Frank Hollstein Peter Meinlschmidt PTS Papiertechnische Stiftung Pirnaer Straße 37 D-01809 Heidenau RTT Steinert GmbH Hirschfelder Ring 9 D-02763 Zittau Fraunhofer Institut für Holzforschung WKI Bienroder Weg 54e D-38108 Braunschweig Keywords: Recycling, waste wood, sorting, NIR imaging 1 Introduction Wood is an important renewable resource as raw material and for energy production. Furthermore, in waste wood coming from building demolition and furniture there is a significant amount of wood based material that can be re-used. But at present, about three quarters of the identified resource of waste wood is either not recycled at all or has a low-value use. One main obstacle to the re-use of waste wood is that a significant proportion of the material is chemically treated which makes it unsuitable for many end users. This aspect makes the separation of the treated wood from clean wood a major element of the wood recycling process. Today, the separation of treated wood and other contaminations from clean wood is mainly based on visual, mechanical, magnetic or gravity sifting techniques and is done at different steps along the waste wood processing chain [1]. Sensor based sorting techniques could help to achieve higher levels of recovery and quality of waste wood and to considerably increase the proportion of a high value material use of waste wood. NIR spectroscopy, especially the NIR imaging technique, is best suited for the automated online sorting of high volumes of waste wood. It has a high discrimination power for organic contaminations and the necessary measuring speed and spatial resolution. In our paper, we present results of online NIR sorting trials with different waste wood mixtures including a presentation of the used NIR measuring system and information on the development of the NIR classification methods. This research work was done within the European research project DEMOWOOD “Optimisation of material recycling and energy recovery from waste and demolition wood in different value chains” (2011-2014) with the support of Wood Wisdom Net (2nd Call) (www.wwnet-demowood.eu). Heft 135 der Schriftenreihe der GDMB 127 Pigorsch, Gärtner, Hollstein, Meinlschmidt 2 Experimental 2.1 NIR Imaging System The NIR measurements were performed by means of a NIR imaging camera KUSTA2.2MSI (LLA Instruments GmbH). The NIR spectral imaging technique enables to obtain spatial and chemical information characterising material samples with high speed and high spatial resolution and offers new possibilities for classification and sorting. For the measurements the camera was connected to a computer. The illumination of the samples is done with halogen lamps. The main parameters of the NIR camera are: • • • • Spectral range Spectral resolution 2D detector array Frame frequency 2.2 1229 to 2157 nm 4 nm InGaAs detector with 320 spatial pixel x 256 spectral pixel 160 Hz Classification Methods The different components in waste wood, like wood, paints or plastic coatings, differ in their chemical compositions, which result in specific spectral differences in the NIR spectra. Figure 1 shows NIR spectra of different waste wood types measured with the NIR camera KUSTA2.2MSI. Characteristic NIR bands of some contaminations are indicated. Figure 1: 128 NIR spectra of waste wood samples Sensor-Based Sorting 2014 Sorting of Waste Wood by NIR Imaging Techniques The spectral differences can be used for the classification of the different contaminations. To distinguish or separate all the possible variations in the NIR absorptions, spectra pre-treatment procedures and chemometric methods are used. For the development of the classification methods, representative samples of the different waste wood types were collected and separated in different fractions. From all waste wood samples the NIR reference spectra were measured (see Fig. 1). The calculation of the classification methods for each waste wood type was done on the basis of the recorded NIR spectra using the discriminant PLS method. Several classification PLS methods have been calculated. Each of them differentiates between two waste wood types. The individual classification methods were then combined to a classification algorithm similar to that shown in Figure 2. Figure 2: Algorithm for classification of different waste wood types This classification algorithm allows the detection and separation of the following waste wood types from a waste wood mixture: W clean waste wood WC wood with coatings (paint, plastics, decor paper) P particle board (uncoated) PC particle board coatings (plastics, decor paper) The structure of the classification algorithm is variable which makes it possible to change or to add sorting criteria (e. g. identification of specific glues) in a simple and easy manner. Heft 135 der Schriftenreihe der GDMB 129 Pigorsch, Gärtner, Hollstein, Meinlschmidt 2.3 Sorting Installation The sorting trials were done using a sorting machine of the project partner RTT Steinert GmbH in Zittau (Germany). Figure 3 shows the sorting installation with the machine and the NIR camera used in the sorting trials. Figure 3: Sorting machine (RTT Steinert) that was used in the sorting trials During the sorting experiments the waste wood particles were manually evenly distributed across the working width of the belt and moved under the NIR camera. The distance between the NIR camera and the conveyor belt was 700 mm resulting in a measuring width of 500 mm and a spatial resolution over the belt of about 2 mm. The conveyor belt had a speed of 2 m/s which gave in connection with the frame frequency of the camera of 160 Hz a spatial resolution of about 13 mm in belt direction. 130 Sensor-Based Sorting 2014 Sorting of Waste Wood by NIR Imaging Techniques 3 Results of Sorting Trials for Model Mixtures 3.1 Classification Experiments In a first step, the NIR classification methods were tested by measuring and classifying single waste wood samples. The following six sample types have been measured: W fresh spruce wood WC window frames with white paint P-UF particle board (uncoated) with urethane-formaldehyde (UF) glue P-MUF particle board (uncoated) with melamine-urethane-formaldehyde (MUF) glue PC-HPL particle board coated with decor paper (HPL) PC-PVC particle board coated with poly-vinyl chloride (PVC) The samples were manually put on the conveyor belt as an array of 25 objects (see Figure 4) and moved under the NIR camera. Three measurements were performed for each sample type. For each measurement, the classification results were visualized using the classification algorithm and compared with a visual image of the sample array. Figure 4 gives an example for the measurement of the PC-PVC samples. Figure 4: Visual and classification images of the sample array PC-PVC A comparison of the visual and classification images in Figure 4 shows a very good agreement between the classification and the composition of the measured wood pieces. The same or similar results were found for all other measurements (see also Table 1) demonstrating a high or sufficient accuracy of the classification algorithm. Only few spectra are wrongly classified. Consequently, Heft 135 der Schriftenreihe der GDMB 131 Pigorsch, Gärtner, Hollstein, Meinlschmidt using the majority-criteria for the classification of the whole object, only very few objects have been given a wrong classification. In Table 1, an analysis of all measured spectra of the samples W, P-UF and P-MUF is given. Table 1: Classification results for the spectra of the samples W, P-UF and P-MUF Spectra Classification Wood Type Measurement Number of Spectra WC or PC Spectra filtered out Classification Accuracy [%] W P W 01 1931 1062 444 3 422 70 W 02 1579 1080 146 5 348 88 W 03 1655 1103 170 2 380 86 P-UF 01 2760 18 2210 45 487 97 P-UF 02 2594 36 2068 42 448 96 P-UF 03 2707 20 2109 33 545 97 P-MUF 01 2885 68 2203 249 365 87 P-MUF 02 1396 70 1703 199 424 86 P-MUF 03 2387 44 1710 212 421 87 The P-UF samples show the highest classification accuracy of over 90 per cent. But, also for the other samples, the classification accuracy of over 85 per cent should be sufficiently high. 3.2 Results of the Sorting Trials The sorting trials were done in three experiments (Table 2). For each experiment, mixtures of wood pieces (size about 3 x 3 cm) of two different waste wood types were prepared. The separation was done according to the chosen sorting criteria. Table 2: Composition of model mixtures and sorting criteria Experiment Component 1 [kg] Component 2 [kg] Sorting Criteria 1 W 2.08 P-UF 3.2 W – clean wood 2 W 1.5 WC 0.6 WC - white paint coating 3 P-UF 5.0 PC-HPL 3.4 PC-HPL – HPL coating 132 Sensor-Based Sorting 2014 Sorting of Waste Wood by NIR Imaging Techniques The waste wood mixtures were manually poured from buckets on the conveyor belt (speed 2 m/s). After the sorting, the two sorted fractions (accept and reject) were weighted and manually analysed. The first experiment has been repeated with the same mixture. In the two other experiments, the accept fraction (wanted fraction) was again put on the conveyor belt, sorted and analysed. The sorting results are given in Table 3. Figure 5 gives a classification picture from the third experiment showing the classification of the two components of the mixture, uncoated and coated particle board. Figure 5: NIR classification image of Experiment 3 Table 3: Analysis of the sorting experiment results Input Comp. 1 Exp. [kg] [%] Comp. 2 [kg] [%] Accept (Passing) Reject (Ejection) Comp. 1 Comp. 2 Comp. 1 Comp. 2 [kg] [%] [kg] [%] [kg] [%] [kg] 96.6 W 1.95 P-UF 86.7 0.3 13.3 96.6 1.85 84.1 0.35 15.9 WC 20.0 0.2 80.0 18.2 0.09 81.8 1A W 2.08 P-UF 39.4 3.2 W 60.6 0.1 3.4 P-UF 2.85 1B 1.95 38.2 3.15 61.8 0.1 3.4 2.8 2A W 1.5 WC 73.2 0.55 W 26.8 1.45 WC 80.6 0.35 19.4 W 0.05 2B 1.45 80.6 0.35 19.4 1.43 84.6 0.26 15.4 0.02 3A P-UF 5 59.5 30.4 P-UF 0.2 13.3 3B 4.8 22.3 0.1 PC-HPL 3.4 69.8 2.1 40.5 P-UF 4.8 69.8 30.4 4.7 Heft 135 der Schriftenreihe der GDMB PC-HPL 2.1 77.7 1.35 [%] PC-HPL 1.3 11.8 0.75 86.7 88.2 133 Pigorsch, Gärtner, Hollstein, Meinlschmidt 3.3 Discussions of the Results Evaluating the achieved accuracy and efficiency in the sorting experiments, one has to consider that: • The control of the ejection valves was not optimized. There was no object recognition. Therefore, the activation signal for the ejection valves was generated using the classification of single spectra. • In the experiments 2 and 3, all wood pieces had two different surfaces, with and without contaminations. Consequently, the probability of the presentation of the contaminated surface to the NIR sensor is only about 50 %, considerably lowering the sorting efficiency. Experiment 1 In this case, the reject was the wanted sorting fraction. Both trials (1 A and 1B) show for the clean wood fraction an increase of share from 39 % to about 85 %. The yield of the clean wood was about 94 %. Experiment 2 and 3 In these experiments, the coating contaminations were the sorting criteria. The accept was the wanted fraction. In both cases, the first sorting step (2A and 3A) showed an increase of share of the clean fraction in the accept of 7 and 10 %, respectively. This poor sorting efficiency was due to the above mentioned 50/50 probability of the presentation of the contaminated surface to the sensor. In contrast, the reject showed a high share of contaminated pieces of 80 and 87 % which demonstrates the high accuracy of the NIR classification. The second sorting step showed a further but, still small increase of share of the wanted fraction in the accept of 4 and 8 %. Again, the share of contaminated pieces in the reject was high with 81 and 88 %. The poorer efficiency of sorting of only surface contaminated material is a general problem encountered in recycling. To liberate the contaminated parts from the clean bulk material it is necessary to shred the wood in smaller pieces. The yield of the uncontaminated material will increase with the decrease in size of the pieces. Conversely, smaller pieces are more difficult to identify by sensors and to eject from the material stream. This conflict is illustrated in Figure 6. 134 Sensor-Based Sorting 2014 Sorting of Waste Wood by NIR Imaging Techniques Figure 6: Connection between particle size of only surface contaminated material and contamination detectability and sorting efficiency The sensor based sorting of small sized material with high speed has already improved considerably in recent years. Especially, the NIR imaging technology will show further progress in this direction. In this context, the results of our sorting experiments are a demonstration of the possibilities of this new technology. Another possibility to improve the efficiency of sorting of material with different surfaces that can be presented to the sensor are the circulation of the material stream, realizing an automated sorting in multiple steps. 4 Conclusions The objective of our work was to demonstrate the feasibility of a NIR sensor based separation of contaminations in waste wood with a high precision and efficiency. From the results of the sorting trials presented in this report can be concluded: • The NIR imaging technology allows the detection of chemical contaminations in waste wood with a high precision and at a high speed. Consequently, the use of this technology makes it possible to sort waste wood with a high efficiency and with a high throughput. • The NIR imaging system used in the sorting trials was able to detect small pieces of waste wood material of sizes from 10 to 50 mm at a speed of 2 m/s. Further optimization of the detection and ejection will allow further decreasing the particle size and increasing the speed of the conveyor belt. Heft 135 der Schriftenreihe der GDMB 135 Pigorsch, Gärtner, Hollstein, Meinlschmidt • The NIR classification methods are able to detect most of the organic chemical contamination, like paint, plastics coating, decor papers and different glues. The developed classification algorithm can be further extended and improved by changing or additing of individual classification methods. • Additional sensor systems, like XRF or LIBS, are necessary for the detection of inorganic contaminations, especially heavy metals. Hence, it can be said that NIR imaging is a very promising technology to reach the target to considerably increase the proportion of a high value material use of waste wood. It makes it possible to develop an automated online sorting system for waste wood that would be efficient and economically feasible. References [1] BAV - Bundesverband der Altholzaufbereiter und -verwerter e.V. (Hrsg.), Leitfaden der Altholzverwertung, 7. Auflage, Berlin, 2012 [2] E. Pigorsch et al., Review on Current Practices on Detection and Sorting Technologies for Waste Wood, Deliverable DL-WP2.1, EU research project DEMOWOOD within Wood Wisdom Net (2nd Call), 2011 136 Sensor-Based Sorting 2014
© Copyright 2024 ExpyDoc