Volume 18 • Supplement 1 • March 2014 123 The World Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery Abstract Book 16th ANNUAL HERNIA REPAIR LAS VEGAS, USA March 12-15, 2014 Invited Papers Free Papers Posters Now indexed and included in ✽ Science Citation Index Expanded Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Current Contents ®/Clinical Medicine ♦ ♦ ♦ ✽ See complete list below the table of contents Official Organ of the European Hernia Society (EHS-GREPA) Official Organ of the American Hernia Society (AHS) (ERNIA 4HEÈ7ORLDÈ*OURNALÈOFÈ(ERNIAÈANDÈ!BDOMINALÈ7ALLÈ3URGERY -LQ\WZ[QV+PQMN )[[WKQI\M-LQ\WZ[ 55Q[MZMb 4M]^MV*MTOQ]U :2.Q\bOQJJWV[ 7UIPI6-=;) >;KP]UXMTQKS )IKPMV/MZUIVa :*MVLI^QL<WZWV\W+IVILI )3QVO[VWZ\P8TaUW]\P=3 .W]VLQVO-LQ\WZ 28+PM^ZMT *WJQOVa.ZIVKM -LQ\WZQIT*WIZL 20)TM`IVLZM 2*.TIUMV\ ;B5I 288ITW\ 83)UQL ,^IV/MTLMZM >5IVLIT¿ -08PQTTQX[ 8ITMZUW1\ITa 4W[)VOMTM[+)=;) +5MaMZ ::MIL 8IZQ[.ZIVKM +ITIJI[I[+)=;) /+IUXIVMTTQ 5QTIVW1\ITa :MQU[.4.ZIVKM B_WTTM<PM6M\PMZTIVL[ )1/QTJMZ\ 5QIUQ.4=;) *MQRQVO+PQVI ;\ZI[JW]ZO.ZIVKM :MQU[.ZIVKM :WKS^QTTM16=;) 0MZVQI /+PIUXI]T\ 50QLITOW8I[K]IT 83+PW_JMa 53]ZbMZ .+WZKQWVM 3)4M*TIVK *WVLa.ZIVKM 6M_,MTPQ1VLQI 6IXWTQ1\ITa 5ILZQL;XIQV 4WVLWV=3 *I\WV:W]OM4)=;) )5WV\OWUMZa 5ITUÕ;_MLMV :32;QUUMZUIKPMZ =\ZMKP\<PM6M\PMZTIVL[ -6QKWTW 2MNNMZ[WV0QTT[8)=;) -6QT[[WV 5W\ITI;_MLMV 1V\MZVI\QWVIT)L^Q[WZa*WIZL 2)JZIPIU[WV 8+]ZKQTTW 32]VOM -8ÈTQ[[QMZ :)T^IZMb ;,IJZW_QMKSQ 63I\SPW]LI 28M\MZ[ /)ZT\ 2,M*WZL 53I^QK *:IU[PI_ 7)ZU[\ZWVO )LMTI<WZZM 03MPTM\ ?:MML 5)ZZMO]Q /.MZbTQ 2.3]STM\I ;:WTT 08*MKSMZ :0.WZ\MTVa 24MZWa 5:W[MV 25*MTTWV 5.ZIVSTQV B5ITIbOQZ\ 4<;WZMV[MV +*MTTW_[ 5.ZIVb 2+5IaIOWQ\QI ;<W_NQOP ,*MZOMZ )//ZMMVJ]ZO 2*5K3MZVIV 8>MZPIMOPM :*Q\\VMZ 30IZWTL ;35Q\\IT />WMTTMZ :+MZ]\\Q 40MZ[bIOM ,7TMaVQSW^ 5?M`TMZ ?+WJJ :,0QTOMZ[ )8IV[ :5BWTTQVOMZ 2+WVbM 41[ZIMT[[WV 0IQNI1[ZIMT +P]TI>Q[\I+)=;) *MZTQV/MZUIVa 6IV\M[.ZIVKM 1VLQIVIXWTQ[16=;) 3WJTMVb/MZUIVa 5ILZQL;XIQV 6M_7ZTMIV[57=;) *ILMV*ILMV/MZUIVa ;\]\\OIZ\/MZUIVa *]MVW[)QZM[)ZOMV\QVI /ZMMV^QTTM;+=;) ) 5]VQKP/MZUIVa .TW]Z\W_V8)=;) *aLOW[bKb8WTIVL 8MWZQI14=;) *]MVW[)QZM[)ZOMV\QVI ;\I\MV1[TIVL6A=;) >QMVVI)][\ZQI ;IV)V\WVQW<@=;) )VV)ZJWZ51=;) *IZZQVO\WV:1=;) ;KW\\[LITM)B=;) *]MVW[)QZM[)ZOMV\QVI )IKPMV/MZUIVa[\I\ ;]VL[^ITT;_MLMV )IKPMV/MZUIVa 4W[)VOMTM[+)=;) AW]VO[\W_V70=;) +WXMVPIOMV,MVUIZS BÛZQKP;_Q\bMZTIVL ;\ZI[JW]ZO.ZIVKM ;IU[]V<]ZSMa /\W5M`QKW ?WWL[\WKS/)=;) 7UIPI6-=;) 7UIPI6-=;) 0MZ[\IT*MTOQ]U +8MQXMZ 0IUU/MZUIVa *M[IVKWV.ZIVKM 4W[)VOMTM[+)=;) +WT]UJQI;+=;) 5QVMWTI6A=;) ;IW8I]TW*ZIbQT +TM^MTIVL70=;) +WXMVPIOMV,MVUIZS 4W[)VOMTM[+)=;) )UQMV[.ZIVKM 5MUXPQ[<6=;) 5WV\ZMIT+IVILI <]K[WV)B=;) HERNIA The World Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery 1 Aims and Scope “Hernia” was founded in 1997 with the purpose of promoting clinical studies and basic research as they apply to groin hernias, internal hernias, the abdominal wall (anterior and postero-lateral aspects), the diaphragm and the perineum. “Hernia” is the official organ of the European Hernia Society (GREPA), established in 1979, and of the American Hernia Society (AHS) established in 1997. These associations have common objectives: ◆ the advancement of abdominal wall and hernia surgery in all aspects, ◆ the study of anatomical, physiological, pathological and therapeutic issues concerning the abdominal wall and hernias, ◆ the creation of associated groups which will promote research and teaching in this field, ◆ the development of interdisciplinary relations. “Hernia” is a journal written by surgeons who have made abdominal wall surgery their special field of interest. 2 Copyright Information For Authors As soon as an article is accepted for publication, authors will be requested to assign copyright of the article (or to grant exclusive publication and dissemination rights) to the publisher (respective the owner if other than Springer). This will ensure the widest possible protection and dissemination of information under copyright laws. More information about copyright regulations for this journal is available at www.springer.com/10029 For Readers While the advice and information in this journal is believed to be true and accurate at the date of its publication, neither the authors, the editors, nor the publisher can accept any legal responsibility for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher makes no warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein. All articles published in this journal are protected by copyright, which covers the exclusive rights to reproduce and distribute the article (e.g., as offprints), as well as all translation rights. No material published in this journal may be reproduced photographically or stored on microfilm, in electronic data bases, on video disks, etc., without first obtaining written permission from the publisher (respective the copyright owner if other than Springer). The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, etc., in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations. Springer has partnered with Copyright Clearance Center's RightsLink service to offer a variety of options for reusing Springer content. For permission to reuse our content please locate the material that you wish to use on link.springer.com or on SpringerImages.com and click on the permissions link or go to copyright.com and enter the title of the publication that you wish to use. For assistance in placing a permission request, Copyright Clearance Center can be connected directly via phone: +1-855-239-3415, fax: +1-978-646-8600 or e-mail: [email protected]. The Canada Institute for Scientific and Technical Information (CISTI) provides a comprehensive, world-wide document delivery service for all Springer journals. For more information, or to place an order for a copyright-cleared Springer document, please contact Client Assistant, Document Delivery, CISTI, Ottawa K1A 0S2, Canada, Tel.: +1-613-993-9251; Fax: +1-613-952-8243, e-mail: [email protected]. © Springer-Verlag France 2014 3 Subscription Information ISSN print edition 1265-4906 ISSN electronic edition 1248-9204 Subscription rates For information on subscription rates please contact Springer Customer Service Center GmbH The Americas (North, South, Central America and the Caribbean): [email protected] Outside the Americas [email protected] Orders and inquiries The Americas (North, South, Central America and the Caribbean): Springer Customer Service Center 233 Spring Street New York, NY 10013-1522, USA Tel.: 800-SPRINGER (777-4643) Tel.: +1-212-460-1500 (outside US and Canada) Fax: +1-212-460-1700 e-mail: [email protected] Outside the Americas via a bookseller or Springer Customer Service Center GmbH Haberstrasse 7, 69126 Heidelberg, Germany Tel.: +49-6221-345-4303, +49-6221-345-4304 Fax: +49-6221-345-4229 e-mail: [email protected] Business hours: Monday to Friday 8 a.m. to 6 p.m. local time and on German public holidays Cancellations must be received by September 30 to take effect at the end of the same year. Changes of address. Allow six weeks for all changes to become effective. All communications should include both old and new addresses (with postal codes) and should be accompanied by a mailing label from a recent issue. According to §4 Sect. 3 of the German Postal Services Data Protection Regulations, if a subscriber’s address changes, the German Post Office can inform the publisher of the new address even if the subscriber has not submitted a formal application for mail to be forwarded. Subscribers not in agreement with this procedure may send a written complaint to Customer Service Journals within 14 days of publication of this issue. Back volumes. Prices are available on request. Microform editions are available from ProQuest. Further information available at http://www.proquest.co.uk/en-UK/ 4 Electronic Edition An electronic edition of this journal is available at link.springer.com 5 Advertising and Partnership Springer France Véronique Serres, Sales 22, rue de Palestro, F-75002 Paris, France Tel.: +33 1 53 00 12 88 Fax: +33 1 53 00 98 61 e-mail: [email protected] 6 Production Springer, Andreas Gösling Journal Production Postfach 105280, D-69042 Heidelberg Germany Tel.: +49-6221-487-8242 Fax: +49-6221-487-68242 e-mail: [email protected] Director of the Publication: Dr. Guido Zosimo-Landolfo Publishing Editor: Nathalie Huilleret 22, rue de Palestro, F-75002 Paris, France Tel.: +33 (1) 53 00 98 78 Fax.: +33 (1) 53 00 98 61 e-mail: [email protected] Typesetters SPS Chennai, India Printed on acid-free paper Springer is a part of Springer Science+Business Media springer.com Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S1-S6 PROGRAM 16th Annual Hernia Repair March 12-15, 2014 Las Vegas, USA © Springer-Verlag 2014 SCIENTIFIC SESSIONS Wednesday, March 12, 2014 11:15 am-12:00 pm Bruce Ramshaw, MD Presidential Address 8:00-8:15 am Brent Matthews, MD & Michael Rosen, MD Welcome 12:00-12:15 am Session 1 Abdominal wall reconstruction Moderators: J. Scott Roth, MD & Yuri Novitsky, MD 8:15-8:35 am Robert Martindale, MD USA IP-12560: Risk reduction: preoperative patient optimization Jaime Cavallo, MD USA FP-12596: 2013 Resident Research Grant – A risk prediction model for ventral hernia recurrence and surgical site occurrences requiring procedural intervention following ventral hernia repair in clean-contaminated and contaminated surgical sites 12:30-1:30 pm Lunch & learn Session 2A Scientific session I Moderators: Gina Adrales, MD & Ricardo Abdalla, MD 8:35-8:55 am S8 Michael Rosen, MD USA IP-139: Rives-Stoppa, Ramirez, TAR or endoscopic CST: decision analysis S11 8:55-9:15 am Alfredo Carbonell, DO USA IP-156: Preoperative pneumoperitoneum, botox injection, tissue expanders 1:45-2:00 pm Alexander Morrell, MD Brazil FP-12504: Obturator hernia treated by Tapp approach 9:15-9:35 am Parog Bhanot, MD USA IP-12548: AWR and mesh infection 2:00-2:15 pm 9:35-9:55 am Pranay Parikh, MD USA IP-12583: AWR requiring muscle flaps and/or panniculectomy Giel G Koning, MD, Ph.D USA FP-126: TIPP versus Lichtenstein: a randomized controlled clinical trial 2:15-2:30 pm Clayton Petro, MD USA FP-131: Predicting 90-day wound morbidity following incisional hernia repair with retrorectus mesh reinforcement 2:30-2:45 pm Christopher Rettenmaier, BS USA FP-116: Component separation index (CSI) and width of diastasis predict complications after open component separation for abdominal hernias 9:55-10:15 am B. Todd Heniford, MD USA IP-140: The consequence of complications in AWR: healthcare cost, reintervention, hernia recurrence 10:15-10:45 am Panel discussion 10:45-11:15 am Break & exhibits S2 2:45-3:00 pm Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S1-S6 Lucas Timmermans, MD USA FP-207: Short term results of a randomized controlled trial comparing primary suture with primary glued mesh augmentation as a means to reduce incisional hernia 3:00-3:15 pm Jason Souza, MD USA FP-109: In vivo evaluation of a novel suture design for abdominal wall closure 3:15-3:30 pm Bindhu Oommen, MD, MPH USA FP-209: Predictors of 30-day readmission after ventral hernia repair 3:30-3:45 pm Session 2B 1:45-2:00 pm 2:00-2:15 pm 2:15-2:30 pm 2:30-2:45 pm 2:45-3:00 pm 3:00-3:15 pm Jacob Greenberg, MD USA IP-160: Prophylactic neurectomy during inguinal hernia repair to prevent chronic inguinodynia: does it work? William Hope, MD USA IP-12545: Impact of novel mesh technology and fixation methods in the incidence of chronic inguinodynia Parviz Amid, MD USA IP-12557: Anterior approach with triple neurectomy for chronic inguinodynia David Chen, MD USA IP-165: Posterior laparoscopic approach with triple neurectomy for chronic inguinodynia Sergio Roll, MD Brazil IP-12556: International guidelines for prevention and management of postoperative chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair Panel discussion 3:45-4:15 pm Break & exhibits S18 8:00-8:15 am Brent Matthews, MD & Michael Rosen, MD Welcome Session 4 Controversies in open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair Moderators: Bruce Ramshaw, MD & David Earle, MD 8:15-8:30 am Matthew Goldblatt, MD USA IP-162: Concomitant laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair during minimally invasive retropubic prostatectomy: do or don’t? 8:30-8:45 am Carl Boyd, MD USA IP-12597: Is watchful waiting appropriate for asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic inguinal hernia? 8:45-9:00 am Kristi Harold, MD USA IP-12550: Inguinal hernia repair in woman: laparoscopic or open repair? 9:00-9:15 am Leandro Cavazzola, MD Brazil IP-12572: Over 45 prospective, randomized trials comparing laparoscopic and open inguinal hernia repair: what do I offer the patient? 9:15-9:30 am Guy Voeller, MD USA IP-12558: Is there a role for tissue-based inguinal hernia repair in adults? 9:30-9:45 am James Bittner, MD USA IP-12598: Is laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair an advanced minimally invasive technique? Credentialing, training and quality assessment 9:45-10:15 am Panel discussion 10:15-10:45 am Break & exhibits 10:45-11:15 am B. Todd Heniford, MD Nyhus-Wantz Lectureship S15 Melissa Phillips, MD USA IP-12562: Assessment, evaluation and nonoperative treatment of patients with inguinodynia after inguinal hernia repair 3:15-3:45 pm 4:15-6:15 pm Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative Moderators: Benjamin Poulose, MD, MPH & Michael Rosen, MD IP-12582: Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative Thursday, March 13, 2014 Joseph Fernandez-Moure, MD USA FP-12574: 2012 Resident research grant – Synthetic hernia mesh with nitric oxide induced bacteriacidal properties – A paradigm shift Chronic inguinodynia Moderators: Parviz Amid, MD & David Chen, MD Session 3 S19 Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S1-S6 S3 Session 5A Expert debates: S21 Ventral hernia repair: this is the ideal location for mesh placement Moderators: Harry Van Goor, MD & Sergio Roll, MD 2:30-2:45 pm Mimi Kim, MD USA FP-12493: The effect of component separation for large open ventral hernia repair (OVHR) on post-operative physical activity 11:15-11:20 am Harry Van Goor, MD & Sergio Roll, MD Introduction 2:45-3:00 pm 11:20-11:30 am Guy Voeller, MD USA IP-12559: Onlay repair after primary fascial closure Samuel Wade Ross, MD, MPH USA FP-12520: Long-term quality of life (QOL) between TEP, TAPP and modified Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair (IHR): A two-year follow-up 3:00-3:15 pm 11:30-11:40 am Benjamin Poulose, MD, MPH USA IP-12571: Underlay retrorectus or preperitoneal repair Baukje Heuvel, MD The Netherlands FP-11345: A new method of follow-up after inguinal hernia repair; validation of the Pinq-Phone 3:15-3:30 pm 11:40-11:50 am Kent Kercher, MD USA IP-12553: Sublay intraperitoneal repair with barrier coated mesh HT Brandsma, MD The Netherlands FP-178: One-year results of prophylactic mesh placement during formation of an end-colostomy for prevention of parastomal hernia; the dutch Prevent-trial 3:30-3:45 pm Alex Cuenca, MD, PhD USA FP-12213: Laparoscopic repair of a paraduodenal hernia Session 6B Biomaterial science session I Evidence based literature Moderator: Bruce Ramshaw, MD 1:45-2:05 pm Corey Deeken, MD USA IP-12549: Preclinical evaluation of biomaterials: material characterization and predictability of clinical performance 2:05-2:25 pm David Earle, MD USA IP-12547: Barrier coated mesh for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair 2:25-2:45 pm James Bittner, MD USA IP-12564: Biologic, absorbable synthetic or permanent mesh for laparoscopic paraesophageal and hiatal hernia repair 2:45-3:05 pm Klaus-Joachim Conze, MD Germany IP-12566: Lightweight mesh for open inguinal hernia repair: effect on recurrence, patientcentered outcomes 3:05-3:25 pm Harry Van Goor, MD The Netherlands IP-12551: Biologic mesh for abdominal wall reconstruction 3:25-3:45 pm Panel discussion 3:45-4:15 pm Break & exhibits 11:50 am-12:10 pm Faculty debate 12:10-12:15 pm Panel discussion Session 5B International Hernia Collaboration: S22 Hernia consultation through social media Moderator: Brian Jacob, MD IP-12595: International Hernia Collaboration: Hernia consultation through social media 11:15-11:30 am Brian Jacob, MD Introduction: Facebook for international hernia collaboration 11:30 am-12:15 pm Panel: Shirin Towfigh, MD & Matthew Goldblatt, MD Cases 12:30-1:30 pm Lunch & learn Session 6A Scientific session II Moderators: William Cobb, MD & Yuri Novitsky, MD S23 1:45-2:00 pm Vít Novacek, PhD France FP-186: A new methodology for abdominal wall biomechanical strain analysis 2:00-2:15 pm Wolfgang Reinpold, MD Germany FP-12505: Endoscopic assisted mini open transhernial sublay repair of ventral and incisional hernias – Matched pair analysis of 300 cases of the German hernia registry 2:15-2:30 pm Michael Rosen, MD USA FP-182: One-year outcomes in a prospective, multicenter study of contaminated ventral hernia repairs using a biosynthetic material S27 S4 Session 7 4:15-4:30 pm 4:30-4:45 pm 4:45-5:00 pm 5:00-5:15 pm 5:15-5:30 pm 5:30-5:45 pm Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S1-S6 AHS Journal Club: Articles all hernia surgeons should know Moderators: Leandro Cavazzola, MD & James Bittner, MD Johannas Jeekel, MD The Netherlands Paper #1: Long term follow up of a randomized controlled trial of suture vs mesh repair of incisional hernia (Ann Surg 2004) Alfredo Carbonell, DO USA Paper #2: Effect of stitch length on wound complications after closure of midline incisions: a randomized controlled trial (Arch Surg 2009) Giampero Campanelli, MD Italy Paper #3: Randomized, controlled, blinded trial of tisseel/tissucol for mesh fixation in patients undergoing lichtenstein technique for primary inguinal hernia repair: results of the Timeli trial (Ann Surg 2012) Brent Matthews, MD USA Paper #4: Comparison of laparoscopic and open repair with mesh for the treatment of ventral incisional hernia: a randomized trial (Arch Surg 2010) Richard Pierce, MD USA Paper #5: Randomized clinical trial comparing suture and mesh repair of umbilical hernia in adults (Br J Surg 2001) Gina Adrales, MD USA Paper #6: A randomized, double-blind, placebocontrolled trial to determine effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis for tension-free mesh herniorrhaphy (J Am Coll Surg 2005) 5:45-6:00 pm Panel discussion Session 8 Humanitarianism: Honoring those who serve others Moderators: Brent Matthews, MD & Charles Filipi, MD 6:00-6:10 pm 6:10-6:20 pm S29 Andrew Kingsnorth, MD United Kingdom IP-12599: Operation hernia Friday, March 14, 2014 8:00-8:15 am Brent Matthews, MD & Michael Rosen, MD Welcome Session 9 Instruction through video: Laparoscopic and open hernia repair Moderators: Ricardo Abdalla, MD & William Cobb, MD 8:15-8:30 am Melissa Phillips, MD USA IP-12563: Myofascial release: Rives-Stoppa and posterior component separation/TAR 8:30-8:45 am Yuri Novitsky, MD USA IP-137: Laparoscpoic ventral hernia repair: defect closure, positioning systems, myofascial release 8:45-9:00 am J. Scott Roth, MD USA IP-166: Anterior component separation release: open ramirez and endoscopic techniques 9:00-9:15 am Nathaniel Stoikes, MD USA IP-161: Laparoscopic paraesophageal and type I hiatal hernia repair 9:15-9:30 am Karl LeBlanc, MD USA IP-159: Laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair 9:30-9:45 am Ricardo Abdalla, MD Brazil IP-12591: Laparoscopic TAPP and TEP inguinal hernia repair 9:45-10:15 am Panel discussion 10:15-10:45 am Break & exhibits Session 10A Scientific session III Moderators: Harry Van Goor, MD & Richard Pierce, MD 10:45-11:00 am Clayton C Petro, MD USA FP-214: Suprapubic hernia repair with a rectus femoris flap 11:00-11:15 am Sean Orenstein, MD USA FP-200: Outcomes of transversus abdominis muscle release (TAR) with synthetic mesh sublay for abdominal wall reconstruction 11:15-11:30 am Phillip Rowse, MD USA FP-133: TEP and Lichtenstein anatomy – Does simulation accelerate acquisition among interns? S30 Panel Discussion S31 S33 Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S1-S6 11:30-11:45 am 11:45 am-12:00 pm 12:00-12:15 pm S5 Eva Deerenberg, MD USA FP-148: A multicenter randomized controlled trial evaluating the effect of small stitches on the longterm incidence of incisional hernia after midline laparotomy (Stitch-trial) Jerrold Young, MD USA FP-113: Long acting local anesthesia for groin hernia repair with a new product: liposomal bupivacaine. a preliminary study of efficacy for reduction of post-operative pain Blair Wormer, MD USA FP-220: A novel intervention for augmenting postoperative urination in patients undergoing laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair 4:15-4:25 pm Carl Doerhoff, MD USA IP-12561: Incarcerated umbilical hernia in a morbidly obese 56 year old male 4:25-4:35 pm Alan Schuricht, MD USA IP-135: Strangulated femoral hernia in a 82 year old female resident of a nursing home 4:35-4:45 pm Jacob Greenberg, MD USA IP-12580: Incarcerated recurrent ventral incisional hernia in a 55 year old diabetic female with possible mesenteric ischemia 4:45-4:55 pm Deron Tessier, MD USA IP-138: Incarcerated inguinal hernia in a 62 year old male with a small bowel obstruction 4:55-5:05 pm J. Scott Roth, MD USA IP-12589: Umbilical hernia with epidermal erosion and ascites leak in a 44 year old male with cirrhosis Session 10B Athletic pubalgia Moderator: L. Michael Brunt, MD 10:45-11:00 am Garth Jacobson, MD USA IP-154: Epidemiology and pathoanatomy of athletic pubalgia 5:05-5:15 pm Brent Matthews, MD USA IP-12573: Examination and imaging characteristics in a patient with athletic pubalgia Matthew Goldblatt, MD USA IP-163: Internal hernia in a 26 year old female 6 months after laparoscopic gastric bypass 5:15-5:30 pm Panel discussion Session 12B Expert debates: Fixation for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair Moderators: Reinhard Bittner, MD & Guy Voeller, MD 4:15-4:25 pm Introduction 4:25-4:35 pm William Cobb, MD USA IP-164: Mechanical nonabsorbable fixation 4:35-4:45 pm Marc Miserez, MD Belgium IP-12565: Mechanical absorbable fixation 4:45-4:55 pm Giampero Campinelli, MD Italy IP-12555: Fibrin sealants 4:55-5:05 pm Brian Jacob, MD USA IP-141: Self adherent mesh 5:05-5:15 pm Edward Felix, MD USA IP-153: No fixation is required 5:15-5:30 pm Faculty debate & Panel discussion 11:00-11:15 am S36 11:15-11:45 am L. Michael Brunt, MD USA IP-12552: Nonoperative and operative treatment strategies in a patient with athletic pubalgia 11:45 am-12:15 pm Panel discussion 12:15-1:45 pm Lunch & learn Session 11 1:45-3:45 pm Complication management: S37 Morbidity conference at the Americas Hernia Society Moderator: Kristi Harold, MD IP-12594: Complication management: Morbidity conference at the Americas Hernia Society Panel: Marc Miserez, MD, Belgium Brent Matthews, MD, USA Eduardo Parra-Davila, MD, USA Salvador Morales-Conde, MD, Spain Garth Jacobson, MD, USA 3:45-4:15 pm Break & exhibits Session 12A Hernia emergencies for the on call general surgeon Moderators: Maurice Arregui, MD & Jerrold Young, MD S38 S40 S6 Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S1-S6 Saturday, March 15, 2014 8:00-8:15 am Brent Matthews, MD & Michael Rosen, MD Welcome Sharon Bachman, MD USA IP-12600: Mesh selection will be determined by genetic profiling: hernia repair 2030 11:50 am-12:15 pm Panel discussion Session 14B Posters of distinction Moderators: David Earle, MD & Andrew Kingsnorth, MD 10:30-10:36 am Rebeccah Baucom, MD USA FP-10933: Does normothermia reduce the risk of surgical site infection in ventral hernia patients? Session 13 The future of hernia surgery Moderators: Marc Miserez, MD & Bruce Ramshaw, MD 8:15-8:30 am Johannas Jeekel, MD The Netherlands IP-12570: Prophylactic mesh placement after laparotomy: primary mesh augmentation to prevent ventral hernia 8:30-8:45 am J. Scott Roth, MD USA IP-167: Quality of life metrics for hernia repair: functionality of abdominal wall reconstruction 10:36-10:42 am Siavash Raigani, MD USA FP-130: Single-center experience with parastomal hernia repair using sublay mesh placement 8:45-9:00 am Michael Franz, MD USA IP-12546: Biomimetic materials for ventral hernia repair: eliciting specific cellular responses 10:42-10:48 am 9:00-9:15 am Alfredo Carbonell, DO USA IP-158: Routine use of synthetic mesh in cleancontaminated and contaminated ventral hernia repairs Carl Tadaki, MD USA FP-172: Comparing perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic vs open inguinal hernia repair using two national large data bases 10:48-10:54 am Clayton Petro, MD USA FP-144: Apples to apples: a validated staging system (I-IV) for incisional hernias 10:54-11:00 am Jacob Greenberg, MD USA FP115: A summative assessment of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair for general surgery residents: perception does not equal reality 11:00-11:06 am Yuhsin Wu, MD USA FP-132: Efficacy of antibiotic pulse lavage irrigation for contaminated retro-rectus abdominal wall reconstructions 11:06-11:12 am Bindhu Oommen, MD, MPH USA FP-12503: Do patients follow-up with their original surgeon when ventral hernia repairs (VHR) fail? 11:12-11:18 am Siavash Raigani, MD USA FP-121: The impact of developing a comprehensive hernia center on referral patterns and cost of hernia care 9:15-9:30 am Ricardo Abdalla, MD Brazil IP-118: Robotic abdominal wall reconstruction 9:30-9:45 am Benjamin Poulose, MD, MPH USA IP-152: Public disclosure of outcomes and cost after hernia repair: surgeon-centered metrics 9:45-10:15 am Panel discussion 10:15-10:30 am Break S42 11:30-11:50 am Session 14A Biomaterial science session II Moderators: Salvador Morales-Conde, MD & Dwijen Misra, MD S45 10:30-10:50 am John Murphy, MD USA IP-12590: Inguinodynia – Causes and prevention 10:50-11:10 am Garth Jacobson, MD USA IP-155: Absorbable synthetic mesh for abdominal wall reconstruction: clinical value or an inexpensive alternative to biologic mesh 11:10-11:30 am Igor Belyansky, MD USA IP-136: Antimicrobial mesh as prophylaxis for mesh infection: preclinical and clinical support for technology Meeting adjourned S47 Hernia (2013) 17 (Suppl 1): S8-S10 ABSTRACTS Wednesday, March 12, 2014 Session 1: Abdominal wall reconstruction © Springer-Verlag 2014 IP-12560 Risk reduction: preoperative patient optimization Martindale R Oregon Health and Science University The success of hernia repair is measured by absence of recurrence, appearance of the surgical scar, and perioperative morbidity. Perioperative surgical site occurrence (SSO), defined as infection, seroma, wound ischemia, and dehiscence, increases the risk of recurrent hernia by at least 3-5 fold. The surgeon should optimize all measures that promote healing, reduce infection, and enhance early postoperative recovery. In the population with ventral hernia, the most common complication in the immediate perioperative period is surgical site infection. Several factors such as smoking, obesity, poor glycemic control, malnutrition, and surgical site contamination are all detrimental to wound healing and should be optimized before surgery. Wound healing or a propensity for postoperative infections is the primary target, both of which increase the incidence of hernia recurrence, and there are some management options that improve wound healing. Obesity and smoking have been shown to be independent risk factors associated with increased recurrence of abdominal hernia and SSO. Poor glycemic control in the remote preoperative period (30-60 days), immediate perioperative and intraoperative period, and postoperative periods has been repeatedly shown to lead to an increase in superficial and deep tissue infections. Malnourished patients have significant alterations in wound healing and immune function and consequently have an increased incidence of postoperative hernia recurrence and SSI. In select populations recent studies now support the use of preoperative metabolic modulating formulations to minimize the catabolic effect of surgical intervention. Many of the things that surgeons do routinely that have been said to decrease infections and wound complications are steeped in tradition, have few if any randomized prospective trials, and are not evidence based. Examples including using shoe covers, scrubs not leaving the operating theater, and even wearing surgical masks have limited or no significant data to support them; one large prospective randomized clinical trial of performing surgery with and without surgical masks showed that it made no difference. IP-139 Rives-Stoppa, Ramirez, TAR or endoscopic CST: decision analysis Rosen M University Hospitals Case Medical Center The field of abdominal wall reconstruction has seen tremendous growth in the last decade. Several innovative technical advancements have now allowed reconstruction of some of the most complex defect imaginable. This lecture will detail the technical aspects of many of these novel approaches. In addition, a careful assessment of indications, contraindications, and reasonable expected outcomes of each of these approaches will be provided. It is likely that no one approach will address all types of ventral hernia repairs. Ultimately, the comprehensive reconstructive surgeon will require a full complement of procedures to approach all ventral hernia repairs. Hernia (2013) 17 (Suppl 1): S8-S10 IP-156 Preoperative pneumoperitoneum, botox injection, tissue expanders Carbonell A Greenville Health System Patients with loss of domain have chronically herniated abdominal contents residing outside the abdominal cavity, in a secondary abdomen. Hernia repair in these patients is dangerous due to respiratory compromise and the risk of abdominal compartment syndrome when an attempt is made to relocate the herniated contents back into the abdominal cavity. Numerous techniques abound for abdominal wall repair in these patients such as progressive preoperative pneumoperitoneum (PPP), botulinum toxin injection of the abdominal wall, tissue expanders, and sequential abdominal wall closure utilizing the artificial burr technique. The technique of PPP employs the gradual insufflation of the abdominal cavity with ambient air which acts as a pneumatic tissue expander, stretching the abdominal wall musculature, dissecting adhesions, and pressurizing the abdomen. This allows for a safer hernia repair since the herniated contents can be relocated to the abdominal cavity without respiratory embarrassment due to elevated intraabdominal pressures. Botulinum toxin paralysis of the abdominal wall allows for oblique muscle lengthening preoperatively, in an effort to increase the elasticity of the abdominal wall and allow for complete abdominal wall reconstruction. Tissue expanders are salinefilled devices which act to slowly lengthen abdominal wall muscles is a similar fashion to botulinum toxin injection. The use of an artificial burr device helps to exert constant medial traction on the midline abdominal wall muscles and slowly lengthens the oblique muscles via isotonic contraction. Each of these techniques are adjunctive maneuvers utilized preoperatively to prepare patients with large hernias and loss of domain for definitive reconstruction The purpose of this talk is to review these innovative preparatory techniques and review their outcomes. IP-12548 AWR and mesh infection Bhanot P Georgetown University Hospital Background: Infection of synthetic mesh following abdominal wall hernia repair is a complex problem. The purpose of this study is to determine whether a staged approach to abdominal wall reconstruction using a porcine acellular dermal matrix is beneficial in the setting of infected synthetic mesh. Methods: The authors performed a retrospective review of 27 patients who underwent immediate, staged complex AWR using porcine acellular dermal matrix (PADM) from 2007-2012. Results: Primary fascial closure was achieved with component separation in 21/27 (78%) patients while 6/22 (22%) received a bridged hernia repair with PADM. Wound related complications developed in 7/27 patients (26%) including wound dehiscence 6/27 (22%), surgical site infection 5/27 (18.5%), and hematomas 1/27 (4%). The hernia recurrence rate observed by 19 months was 18.5%. A bridged hernia repair and the development of a post-operative infection were associated with hernia recurrence, p<0.05. Conclusion: A 2-stage approach to abdominal wall reconstruction with PADM can provide a safe and effective solution for patients with infected synthetic mesh. S9 IP-12583 AWR requiring muscle flaps and/or panniculectomy Parikh P Baystate IP-140 The consequence of complications in AWR: healthcare cost, reintervention, hernia recurrence Heniford B, Augenstein V, Colivita P Carolinas Medical Center Objectives: To measure the expense of wound complications. Background: Wound and mesh complications following ventral hernia repair (VHR) are costly, but the price is more than just money. Methods: Prospective, consecutive, open VHRs from 2008-2011 were analyzed. Wound infection, wound complications (breakdown, seroma requiring intervention, abscess), and mesh infection were examined. Charges incorporated all hernia-related visits, interventions, and re-admissions within one year. Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney tests were used to compare charges. Quality of life (QOL) was measured using Carolinas Comfort Scale. Results: Five hundred consecutive open VHRs were analyzed. Patients were 57.2% female, mean age of 56.4 years, BMI of 33.1, and 60.6% had recurrent hernias. Average defect and mesh sizes were 198.3 cm2 and 784 cm2. Panniculectomy and component separation were performed in 31.8% and 25.4% of cases, respectively. Mean hospital changes included - mesh infections [11 patients (2.2%)]: $82,779; wound infections [## patients (XX%)]: $65,240; wound complications [## patients (XX%)]: $59,118; no wound complications: $38,677 (p<0.001). Mean follow-up charges were: mesh infections- $63,389, wound infections- $20,232, wound complications $15,144 and no complications - $1,393 (p<0.001). Complications significantly impacted office efficiency. Patients without complications had 2.4 average post-operative visits, wound infections yielded 6.7, and mesh infections averaged 9.2. 51.7% and 90.9% of wound and mesh infection patients required readmission. At 2 week and 1 month follow-up, there were no differences in QOL in patients with and without infection or complications. At 6-month follow-up, 57.6% of patients with complications or infection had symptomatic discomfort versus 35.4% without complications (p=0.01), 58.6% versus 29.9% (p<0.001) had activity limitation, and 52.5% versus 34.2% reported mesh sensation (p=0.031). Conclusion: VHR wound-related complications are responsible for significant cost on many levels: the financial impact during hospitalization and after discharge, the increased patient and physician time investment, and the reduction in patient QOL. Efforts to reduce VHR wound-related complications should be strongly pursued. S10 FP-12596 A risk prediction model for ventral hernia recurrence and surgical site occurrences requiring procedural intervention following ventral hernia repair in cleancontaminated and contaminated surgical sites Cavallo J Washington University School of Medicine Introduction: The study purpose is to create multivariable risk prediction models that use patient characteristics, surgical site classifications, and planned mesh type to pre-operatively calculate the risk of hernia recurrence (HR) and the risk of surgical site occurrences requiring procedural intervention (SSOPI) for patients undergoing clean-contaminated and contaminated ventral hernia repair (VHR). We hypothesize that mesh type will remain in the multivariable risk prediction models for both the risk of HR and the risk of SSOPI, and that permanent synthetic mesh reinforcement would incur reduced risk for both outcomes compared to biologic mesh reinforcement. Methods: Leveraging existing resources of the MESH Consortium, the presence and frequencies of HR and SSOPI will be assessed from a prospectively maintained multi-institutional database for clean-contaminated and contaminated VHR. Univariate analyses between preoperative patient characteristics, surgical site classifications, or mesh type (independent variables) and HR or SSOPI (dependent variables) will be conducted. Statistically-significant univariate associations (p<0.2) will be entered into the multivariable risk prediction models for HR and SSOPI, and evaluated via logistic or linear regression models. Multivariable models will be reduced via backward elimination using a p<O.OS, and all possible combinations of models will be evaluated for best fit. Potential: These pre-operative risk prediction tools will calculate risk values that aid appropriate patient selection for elective VHR in clean-contaminated and contaminated surgical sites, assist patient counseling about modifiable risk factors for HR or SSOPI, enable patient participation in decision making about the planned VHR, and inform surgeon selection of mesh type for VHR reinforcement. Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S8-S10 Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S11-S14 ABSTRACTS Wednesday, March 12, 2014 Session 2A: Scientific session I © Springer-Verlag 2014 FP-12504 Obturator hernia treated by TAPP approach Morrell A, Ribeiro D, Riberio G, Furtado M, Pareja T, Cavazzola L, Malcher F, Farah F, Meyer A, Costas M Brazil Obturator hernia is a rare but important cause of intestinal obstruction. Because it’s an unusual pathology, the diagnoses is usually delayed and is done during surgery or by the CT Scan in the pre operative evaluation of an acute abdomen. The Obturator hernia represents 0.1 to 1.0% of all hernias and it is 6 times more frequent in woman in the 5th to 6th decade. In the etiology, we have factors as multiparity with format and progressive relaxation and tilt of the female pelvis and slimming sharp. The video show a TAPP approach for an Obturator Hernia in a 55 years old woman presented at emergency room. The video shows the CT Scan, a brief case description and the trans abdominal pre peritoneal (TAPP) procedure done in this case. At the end it’s enhanced some aspects in the diagnoses and pathology of the Obturator hernia. FP-126 TIPP versus Lichtenstein: a randomized controlled clinical trial Koning G, Keus F, Koeslag L, Cheung C, Avci M, van Laarhoven C, Vriens P Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre Background: Preliminary experience has suggested that preperitoneal mesh positioning causes less chronic pain than Lichtenstein’s technique for inguinal hernia repair. Therefore, a randomised controlled trial was conducted with the aim of evaluating the incidence of postoperative chronic pain after transinguinal preperitoneal (TIPP) mesh repair versus Lichtenstein’s technique. Methods: Patients with a primary unilateral inguinal hernia were randomised to either TIPP or Lichtenstein’s repair in two teaching hospitals. The primary outcome was the number of patients with chronic pain after surgery. Secondary outcomes were adverse events. Follow-up was scheduled after 14 days, 3 months and 1 year. Patients and outcome assessors were blinded. Results: A total of 302 patients were randomised to TIPP (143) or Lichtenstein (159) repair. Baseline characteristics were comparable in the two groups. Some 98.0 per cent of the patients were included in the analysis (141 in the TIPP group and 155 in the Lichtenstein group). Significantly fewer patients in the TIPP group had continuous chronic pain 1 year after surgery: five patients (3.5%) versus 20 patients (12.9%) in the Lichtenstein group (p=0.004). An additional 12 patients (8.5%) in the TIPP group and 60 (38.7%) in the Lichtenstein group experienced pain during activity (p=0.001). There were two patients with recurrence in the TIPP group and four in the Lichtenstein group, but no significant differences were found in other severe adverse events between the groups. Conclusion: Fewer patients had continuous chronic pain or pain during activity at 1 year after the TIPP mesh inguinal hernia repair compared with Lichtenstein’s repair. Registration number: ISRCTN93798494 (http://www.controlled-trials.com). S12 FP-131 Predicting 90-day wound morbidity following incisional hernia repair with retrorectus mesh reinforcement Petro C, Posielski N, Raigani S, Wang J, Criss C, Orenstein S, Rosen M, Novitsky Y University Hospitals Case Medical Center Background: Predicting wound morbidity after complex abdominal wall reconstructions (AWR) remains a challenge. While retrorectus repairs are gaining in popularity, specific risk factors for wound complications for this approach remain unclear. We aimed to identify the incidence and predictors of 90-day wound morbidity for patients undergoing complex AWR with retrorectus mesh placement. Methods: Consecutive retrorectus hernia repairs performed at Case Medical Center were identified in our prospective database and analyzed. Primary outcome measure was the incidence of surgical site occurrence (SSO) requiring an intervention. Statistical analysis was performed utilizing univariate analysis using Chi-squared and logistic regression as well as multivariate regression; p<0.05 was considered significant. Results: From 2006-2013, 307 patients met inclusion criteria with at least 90-day follow-up. Eighty-nine SSOs were identified. Seven seromas required drainage, 3 at the bedside and 4 by interventional radiology (IR). There were 65 (21.2%) surgical site infections (SSI) with the majority being superficial. SSIs were treated with antibiotics alone in 27/34 superficial and 3/29 deep infections. Bedside drainage was necessary for 7 superficial and 4 deep SSIs, while IR drainage was necessary for 13/28 deep SSIs. Operative debridement was performed in the remaining 9 deep and 1 organ space SSIs (necessitating the only instance of mesh excision in the setting of perforated bowel/ileostomy creation). Obesity, diabetes, smoking, ASA, hernia width >20 cm and biologic mesh were independent predictors of SSO. SSO/SSI rates were 6%/6% for Grade 1, 16%/12% for Grade 2, and 39%/18% for Grade 3 hernias. Conclusion: Mesh positioning during complex AWR has significant impact on wound complications. For the first time, based on a large cohort of patients, we identified specific patient and wound factors contributing to SSOs for hernia repairs with retromuscular mesh palcement. Our findings represent an important addition to AWR outcomes data to facilitate patient counseling as well as technique and mesh selections. Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S11-S14 FP-116 Component separation index (CSI) and width of diastasis predict complications after open components separation for abdominal hernias Goldblatt M, Rettenmaier C, Abston E, Frelich M, Wallace J, Gould J Medical College of Wisconsin Background: Components separation is a method of hernia repair utilized for complex hernias. This technique may have short term morbidity due to the extensive dissection required. The Component Separation Index (CSI) is a metric that objectively defines hernia morphology in relation to body habitus. We hypothesized that a larger CSI and longer Width of Diastasis (WD) were predictive of shortterm (30-day) postoperative complications. Methods: This is a retrospective review of patients who underwent components separation at the Medical College of Wisconsin from August 2009 to January 2013. Clinical and perioperative information was collected up to 30 days after surgery. The CSI was calculated from CT scans by dividing the angle of diastasis, measured from the aorta to the medial edges of the rectus abdominis muscles, by 360°. Results: Thirty-nine patients underwent open components separation during the study period (35 bilateral, 4 unilateral). The majority of repairs were recurrent (31, 79.5%). A total of 9 patients (23.1%) experienced complications before discharge. Fourteen patients (35.9%) experienced complications within 30 days of discharge, of which 11 (78.6%) were wound complications. According to the ACSNSQIP wound classification system our series presented 23 (59.0%) clean, 5 (12.8%) clean-contaminated, 9 (23.1%) contaminated, and 2 (5.1%) dirty wounds. No reoperations occurred. The mean followup interval was 17.8 months. There were three hernia recurrences (7.7%) with a mean interval to known recurrence of 7.0 months. A smaller CSI correlated with a greater incidence of total complications (p=0.05), post-discharge complications (p<0.01), and post-discharge wound complications (p=0.02). A larger CSI predicted hernia recurrence (p=0.05). A larger WD predicted pre-discharge complications (p=0.04). Conclusions: CSI is a valid predictor of 30-day complications, but unexpectedly, patients with lower CSI have more complications. These findings are not reproduced with WD. Larger CSI does correlate with greater recurrence rate in our cohort. Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S11-S14 FP-207 Short term results of a randomized controlled trial comparing primary suture with primary glued mesh augmentation as a means to reduce incisional hernia Timmermans L, Jeekel J, Lange J Erasmus MC Background: Incisional hernia (IH) is one of the most frequent postoperative complications after abdominal surgery. Patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) or patients with a BMI of 27 or higher have a risk of developing an IH of more than 30%. Primary mesh augmentation (PMA) is a method in which the abdominal wall is strengthened to reduce IH incidence. This paper focuses on the short-term results of the PRIMA trial, a multicentre double blind randomized controlled trial (RCT) which compared onlay glued mesh augmentation (OMA) and sublay glued mesh augmentation (SMA) to primary suture (PS) Methods: The RCT was performed in 11 hospitals in the Netherlands, Germany and Austria. Between 2009 and 2012, patients were included if they were either operated via midline laparotomy for an AAA or if they had a BMI of 27 or higher. Patients were randomly assigned to either receive PS, OMA or SMA. Results: A total of 498 patients were selected of which 18 patients were excluded preoperatively, leaving 480 randomized patients. During analysis statistically significant (p=0.002) more seromas were detected after OMA (n=34, 18.1%) compared to PS (n=5, 4.7%) and SMA (n=13,7%). No other differences were discovered in any of the other outcomes. During multivariable analysis, seroma formation after OMA had an odds ratio (OR) of 4.5 (p=0.003) compared to PS and an OR of 2.9 (p=0.003) compared to SMA. Conclusion: Based on the short-term results, PMA is a save procedure with only an elevation in seroma formation after OMA, but without an increased risk of surgical site infection (SSI). The longterm effects of PMA shall be evaluated after conclusion of the follow-up period of this RCT. S13 FP-109 In vivo evaluation of a novel suture design for abdominal wall closure Souza J, Dumanian G Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine Purpose: We present a novel suture design aimed at minimizing the early laparotomy dehiscence that drives ventral hernia formation. Methods: Incisional hernias were produced in 30 rats according to an established hernia model. The rat hernias were randomized to repair with either two 5-0 polypropylene sutures (Group 1) or two mid-weight polypropylene mesh sutures (Group 2) placed in similar fashion. Standardized photographs were taken prior to repair and 1 month after repair, with an intra-abdominal sheet of 2 mm grid graph paper serving as a calibration reference for all photographs. Edge-detection software was used to define the border of the hernia defect and calculate the defect area. Histology was performed on all mesh suture specimens, with in-growth graded according to the ASTM 4-point scale. Results: Seventeen hernias were repaired with mesh sutures; 13 hernias were repaired with conventional sutures. Despite randomization, the defects repaired with mesh suture were significantly larger than those undergoing conventional suture repair (391.9±33.4 mm2 vs 255.4±23.3 mm2; p<0.0025). The mean area of the recurrent defects following repair with mesh suture was 177.8±27.1 mm2, compared to 267.3±34.1 mm2 following conventional suture repair. This correlated to a 57.4% reduction in defect area after mesh suture repair, compared to a 10.1% increase in defect area following conventional suture repair (p<0.0007). None (0/34) of the mesh sutures pulledthrough the surrounding tissue, while 65% (17/26) of the conventional sutures demonstrated complete pull-through. Excellent (ASTM3) in-growth was observed in 13/17 mesh suture specimens; 4 specimens demonstrated Good (ASTM2) in-growth. Conclusions: The mesh sutures better resisted suture pull-through than conventional polypropylene sutures. By more evenly distributing distracting forces and permitting tissue integration into the substance of the suture, a suture incorporating these design elements may prevent the early laparotomy dehiscence that leads to incisional hernia formation. S14 FP-209 Predictors of 30-day readmission after ventral hernia repair Oommen B, Kim M, Ross S, Bradley J, Williams K, Walters A, Lincourt A, Heniford B, Augenstein V Carolinas Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Division of Gastrointestinal & Minimally Invasive Surgery Introduction: Hospital readmission within 30 days of surgery is associated with negative patient outcomes and increased healthcare costs. Current data regarding risk factors for readmission after ventral hernia repair (VHR) are limited. We analyzed basis for readmission after VHR. Methods and procedures: The ACS-NSQIP database was queried for all inpatient VHRs. Inclusion criteria were elective VHR with 30-day readmission data recorded (available since 2011). Bivariate analysis was performed to determine variables that were potentially associated with readmission. Multivariate regression, incorporating significant factors identified on the bivariate analysis, was then performed. Results: Out of 10,529 elective VHRs (7,987 open; 2,402 laparoscopic), 9,495 met inclusion criteria. The overall 30-day readmission rate was 9.9%. Mean age was 57.8±13.5 years; 572% were female. Patients readmitted were more likely to have the following preoperative conditions (p≤0.05): higher mean BMI (34.0±9.1 vs 33.2±8.6 kg/m2), diabetes (12.7% vs 9.2%), smoking (12.5% vs 9.3%), dyspnea (14.5% vs 9.4%), dependent functional status (21.5% vs 9.7%), COPD (15.9% vs 9.5%), ascites (18.4% vs 9.8%), CHF (31.7% vs 9.8%), hypertension (10.7% vs 8.9%), dialysis (16.8% vs 9.8%), bleeding disorder (13.0% vs 9.8%), wound class II-IV (12.4% vs 8.5%), ASA class IV/V (17.5% vs 9.6%). Postoperative complications were also associated with readmission (p<0.001): superficial SSI (36.1% vs 8.8%), deep SSI (62.2% vs 8.8%), organ space SSI (53.5% vs 9.2%), pneumonia (31.3% vs 9.5%), unplanned intubation (20.4% vs 9.7%), pulmonary embolism (45.9% vs 9.7%), ventilator >48 hours (20.2% vs 9.8%), progressive renal insufficiency (38.0% vs 9.8%), UTI (22.8% vs 9.7%), stroke (53.9% vs 9.8%), MI (43.2% vs 9.8%), perioperative transfusions (20.0% vs 9.4%), graft/prosthesis failure (66.7% vs 9.9%), DVT (46.9% vs 9.7%), sepsis (50.4% vs 8.9%), septic shock (36.1% vs 9.7%), reoperation (57.5% vs 7.7%). Readmission was associated with longer mean operative time (181±111 vs 148±98 min), mean LOS (5.9±12.8 vs 4.4±7.8 days), and open repair (11.0% vs 6.2%); p<0.001 for all. Multivariate regression found diabetes, smoking, dyspnea, dependent functional status, CHF, wound classification, ASA class, open approach, and operative time to be independent factors associated with readmission after VHR. Conclusions: Readmission after ventral hernia surgery is a more common occurrence that might before have been suspected and correlates with specific preoperative patient factors, operative characteristics, and postoperative complications. By targeting these risk factors for quality improvement and decreasing operative time, readmission rates and healthcare costs may be significantly improved. While laparoscopic VHR has lower readmission rates overall, other factors, including case complexity, may impact these findings. Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S11-S14 FP-12574 2012 Resident research grant – Synthetic hernia mesh with nitric oxide induced bacteriacidal properties – A paradigm shift Fernandez-Moure J, Van Eps J, Bryan N, Weiner B, Olsen R, Dunkin B, Tasciotti E Houston Methodist Hospital Background: Mesh infection after ventral hernia repair results in significant morbidity. Management includes re-operation with mesh excision and antibiotic therapy. Impregnating mesh with antibiotics may decrease infection but is prone to resistance. Nitric Oxide (NO), a diatomic free radical with no known resistance mechanism, plays a key role in the natural immune response to fighting infection and may overcome these limitations. We sought to create a NO-releasing mesh and study its antibacterial efficacy in vitro and in vivo, hypothesizing that a NO-releasing polyester mesh would prevent MRSA colonization and growth. Methods: NO-Silica (NO-Si) nanoparticles were synthesized via a co-condensation of tetraethoxysilane with aminoalkoxysilane with methanol and ammonia under high pressure nitrous oxide. NO release was measured and confirmed using a chemiluminescence NO analyzer. MRSA bactericidal efficacy of these nanoparticles was quantified in vitro through tryptic soy broth assay. The NO-Si nanoparticles were then bound to a commercially available polyester mesh and implanted in a rat model of ventral hernia repair and inoculated with MRSA. Bacterial growth was quantified using colony forming unit assay. Results: NO-Si, synthesized at 500nm, was capable of NO release for up to 12 hours. NO release from the NO-silica polyester mesh was equivalent to NO-Si alone. MRSA CFUs recovered relative to treatment demonstrated a dose dependent response to NO-Si with 100% bactericidal effect at 66mg NO-Si in vitro. The in vivo bactericidal effects of the NO-releasing mesh correlated with in vitro results with 100% bacterial clearance at 66mg NO-Si. Conclusion: This study created a NO-releasing synthetic mesh and demonstrated its MRSA bactericidal efficacy both in vitro and in vivo. Creation of a novel polyester mesh with enhanced non-antibiotic antibacterial activity using nanoparticles may lead to a paradigm shift in treating not only abdominal wall defects in a contaminated environment, but perhaps all surgeries that require use of a synthetic mesh. Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S15-S17 ABSTRACTS Wednesday, March 12, 2014 Session 2B: Chronic inguinodynia © Springer-Verlag 2014 IP-12562 Assessment, evaluation and nonoperative treatment of patients with inguinodynia after inguinal hernia repair Phillips M University of Tennessee Health Science Center Chronic groin pain has been estimated to occur in 15-25% of patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair. Surgical technique is an important aspect of prevention of this pain with identification and care to preserve the nerves of the groin playing an essential role. Assessment of these patients involves detailing the onset and quality of pain as well as the patterns of radiation and the nature of pain. Initial management entails excluding non-neuropathic pain etiologies such as recurrent hernia or mesh infection. Imaging studies may be indicated to further investigate these sources. Pain management in the early postoperative period will include opioids and NSAIDs, where persistent pain may require the addition of nerve blocks or nerve ablation. Others will address the surgical techniques for management of chronic inguinodynia including groin exploration, mesh removal, and neurectomy. IP-160 Prophylactic neurectomy during inguinal hernia repair to prevent chronic inguinodynia: does it work? Greenberg J University of Wisconsin The incidence of inguinodynia following inguinal hernia repair ranges from 0-63% in the literature. While neurectomy is frequently involved in the treatment of chronic groin pain, the role of prophylactic neurectomy during inguinal hernia repair remains unclear. Of the three nerves commonly responsible for postoperative inguinodynia, prophylactic ilioinguinal neurectomy has been the most widely studied. Five separate randomized controlled trials (RCT) have evaluated the effect of prophylactic ilioinguinal neurectomy on the incidence of postoperative inguinodynia. A meta-analysis incorporating four of these trials showed a small but significant decrease in the degree of pain at 6 months favoring neurectomy (-0.29 on a 10-point scale) [1]. The fifth and most recent study showed no significant reduction in the rate of moderate or severe pain intensity beyond the first month of follow-up [2]. One RCT has looked at ilioinguinal neurectomy in conjunction with subcutaneous transposition of the spermatic cord and found no change in chronic pain at 6 months while at rest. However, neurectomy was associated with decreased rates of chronic pain while walking (0% vs 41.7%, p=0.001) and ascending stairs (0% vs 37.5%, p=0.02) [3]. An alternative approach to prophylactic neurectomy is identification and preservation of all nerves during herniorraphy. One multicenter prospective study of 973 patients undergoing open mesh inguinal hernia repair, found that the lack of identification of nerves as well as the division of nerves were both significantly correlated with the presence of chronic pain [4]. Another study of 525 patients undergoing Lichtenstein hernioplasty assessed the value of nerve identification and resection of nerves “at risk” again found the non-identification of nerves correlated to the highest level of inguinodynia at 3 months [5]. While prophylactic neurectomy may have some benefit with respect to inguinodynia, a focus on intraoperative nerve identification and preservation is likely more beneficial. References: 1. Johner, A., J. Faulds, and S.M. Wiseman, Planned ilioinguinal nerve excision for prevention of chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair: a metaanalysis. Surgery, 2011. 150 (3): p. 534-41. 2. Crea, N. and G. Pata, Effects of prophylactic ilioinguinal nerve excision in mesh groin hernia repair: short- and long-term follow-up of a randomized clinical trial. Am Surg, 2010. 76 (11): p. 1275-81. 3. Caliskan, K., et al., A method for the reduction of chronic pain after tension-free repair of inguinal hernia: iliohypogastric neurectomy and subcutaneous transposition of the spermatic cord. Hernia, 2010. 14 (1): p. 51-5. 4. Alfieri, S., et al., Influence of preservation versus division of ilioinguinal, iliohypogastric, and genital nerves during open mesh herniorrhaphy: prospective multicentric study of chronic pain. Ann Surg, 2006. 243 (4): p. 553-8. 5. Smeds, S., L. Lofstrom, and O. Eriksson, Influence of nerve identification and the resection of nerves “at risk” on postoperative pain in open inguinal hernia repair. Hernia, 2010. 14 (3): p. 265-70. S16 IP-12545 Impact of novel mesh technology and fixation methods in the incidence of chronic inguinodynia Hope W New Hanover Regional Medical Center The traditional outcome measure related to inguinal hernia repair has been hernia recurrence. With improvements in technique, knowledge of anatomy, and the use of mesh the hernia recurrence rates have become quite low. The improvements seen in hernia recurrence have caused a shift in focus away from hernia recurrence and towards the understanding and treatment of chronic groin pain. Chronic groin pain can be a devastating complication following inguinal hernia repair and one that continues to plague and confuse surgeons and patients. Many factors can lead to chronic groin following inguinal hernia repair. Pain can generally be classified as neuropathic (related to nerve injury or damage) or non-neuropathic (related to mesh or other causes) and has been documented after all major types of repair including tissue based repairs, open anterior and preperitoneal approaches, and laparoscopic repairs. Recently, several promising technologies have been developed in hopes of minimizing chronic groin pain and will be reviewed. The concept of lightweight mesh has been intriguing for lowering the incidence of chronic pain as the mesh will incite less of a foreign body reaction. To date, their does seem to be some improvement in groin pain with the use of lightweight mesh; however the reports are conflicting with further studies needed. Newer self-gripping meshes have also been developed but so far have not shown demonstrable improvements on the incidence of chronic groin pain. Methods of fixation have also been a focus with the use of glue fixation showing improvements in the incidence of chronic groin pain compared to sutures in some studies. Chronic groin pain is a challenging problem that is not entirely understood. Although several new technologies such as lightweight mesh, self-gripping mesh, and sealants/glues have shown some promise in possibly lowering the incidence of chronic groin pain to date there is no single technique/mesh that can be promoted or recommended as there is insufficient data on these newer technologies. IP-12557 Anterior approach with triple neurectomy for chronic inguinodynia Amid P University of California, Los Angeles With the rate of recurrence significantly declined due to the use of mesh and tension free techniques, chronic pain is the main concern of surgeons around the globe and number one cause of legal liability. “Triple neurectomy” suggested by our group in 1987, can be performed through an open approach using the groin incision of the original hernia operation or through a laparoscopic approach particularly for pain after plug repair and open and laparoscopic preperitoneal repair. Advantages of the open approach is the possibility of performing a single stage operation for triple neurectomy as well as plug/meshoma removal if any, repair of the resulting defect, resection of the main trunk of the GFN over psoas muscle, and resection of paravasal nerves within the lamina propria of the vas in case of associated orchialgia. Disadvantages of the approach is its complexity and technical difficulty operating within the scarred field. Advantages Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S15-S17 of the laparoscopic approach are the ability of resecting nerves proximal to the mesh material used during the original herniorrhaphy, working within the untouched retroperitoneum with its uniform neuroanatomy, and its technical simplicity Disadvantages of laporoscopic approach are not being able to remove plugs if any, not being able to resect the lamina propria of the vas in case of associated orchialgia and potential laxity of the abdominal muscles caused from proximal denervation. Our experience has included over 600 patient utilizing an open approach with an over 85% success rate and 37 cases using a laparoscopic retroperitoneal approach with a 92% success rate. Planning surgical management for remediation of pain largely depends on the method of the original hernia repair and its success requires in depth knowledge of groin neuroanatomy (A) in front of transversalis fascia (i.e. ilioinguinal, the visible and intramuscular segment of iliohypogastric, and the inguinal segment of the genital branch of the genitofemoral nerve), (B) behind the transversalis fascia within the preperitoneal space (i.e. the main trunk of the genitofemoral and the preperitoneal segment of genital branch of GFN), and (C) within the retroperitoneal space (the main trunks of the ilioinguinal, iliohypogastric nerves over the quadratus lumborum and the main trunk of the GFN over psoas muscle). IP-165 Posterior laparoscopic approach with triple neurectomy for chronic inguinodynia Chen D University of California, Los Angeles Due to the technical success of tension-free hernia repairs, chronic groin pain has far surpassed recurrence as the most common and important long-term complication after open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Triple Neurectomy of the iliohypogastric, ilioinguinal, and genitofemoral nerves remains the gold standard in the operative management of refractory inguinodynia. Standard triple neurectomy does not address neuropathic pain caused by neuropathy of the preperitoneal nerves after plug and open and laparoscopic hernia repair unless the operation is extended to include retroperitoneal resection of the main trunk of the genitofemoral nerve. Access to these nerves proximal to the site of pathology has been the major limitation in treatment failures. Laparoendoscopic access to the retroperitoneal lumbar plexus has been utilized for selective and triple neurectomy to all potential sites of peripheral neuropathic pathology from all prior open and laparoscopic anterior and posterior repair techniques. This allows for consistent and reliable nerve identification, avoidance of the previously scarred field, proximal neurectomy, and obviates the need for repair of a resultant defect in the inguinal floor. The operation is performed using minimally invasive access the retroperitoneal space overlying the quadratus and psoas muscles. Surgery involves identification of the subcostal, iliohypogastric, ilioinguinal, genitofemoral, and lateral femoral cutaneous nerve trunks with neurectomy of the iliohypogastric, ilioinguinal nerve, and genitofemoral nerve trunks. Laparoscopic retroperitoneal triple neurectomy for treatment of inguinodynia after open and laparoscopic anterior and preperitoneal mesh repair is a safe and effective procedure overcoming many of the limitations of previous operative techniques. Utilization of a different operative field allows for immediate assessment of the efficacy of this operation. In the absence of recurrence or overt meshoma, it may be the preferred technique for the definitive management of chronic neuralgia after all prior types of hernia repair. Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S15-S17 IP-12556 International guidelines for prevention and management of postoperative chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair Roll S Brazil S17 Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S18 ABSTRACTS Wednesday, March 12, 2014 Session 3: Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative © Springer-Verlag 2014 IP-12582 Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative Poulose B, Rosen M Vanderbilt University Medical Center The Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative (AHSQC) mission is to provide health care professionals real-time information for maximizing value in hernia care. Formed in 2013 by hernia surgeons in private practice and academic settings, the AHSQC utilizes concepts of continuous quality improvement to improve outcomes and optimize costs. This is accomplished through patient-centered data collection, ongoing performance feedback to clinicians, analysis of collected data and collaborative learning. The AHSQC will provide critically needed information for patients, surgeons, hospitals, the FDA, and industry to improve the value of care delivered to hernia patients. Quality improvement, education, and stakeholder engagement will be important activities that support this effort. Broad publication and dissemination of AHSQC findings and best practices will increase public awareness of the AHSQC mission while improving care for patients. We invite all surgeons involved in hernia care to be an active member of the AHSQC. Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S19-S20 ABSTRACTS Thursday, March 13, 2014 Session 4: Controversies in open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair © Springer-Verlag 2014 IP-162 Concomitant laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair during minimally invasive retropubic prostatectomy: do or don’t? Goldblatt M Medical College of Wisconsin During a robotic assisted retropubic prostatectomy, Urologists take down the bladder flap in a very similar manner to a Trans-Abdominal Pre-Peritoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair. It is therefore not uncommon to find both direct and indirect inguinal hernias that were not appreciated before surgery. With the growing number of robotic prostatectomies done in the U.S., the incidence of an intra-operative consultation for a hernia repair is becoming more common. The dilemma one is faced with is whether to repair this hernia at the same setting or to delay and repair at a different time. If you do not repair it, the pre-peritoneal planes have been disturbed and so a laparoscopic approach at a later date may be difficult. If you do choose to repair it can mesh be used since they have entered the bladder and urethra. In addition, although rare, a urine leak could spill out onto the mesh. Finally, the patient has not been consented for this procedure, which has its own set of complications including chronic pain and recurrence. In this presentation the argument for both sides of the issue will be presented. The data supporting the delayed repair vs immediate reconstruction will be discussed. IP-12597 Is watchful waiting appropriate for asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic inguinal hernia? Boyd C Memorial Health University Medical Center IP-12550 Inguinal hernia repair in woman: laparoscopic or open repair? Harold K Mayo Clinic IP-12572 Over 45 prospective, randomized trials comparing laparoscopic and open inguinal hernia repair: what do I offer the patient? Cavazzola L Brazil The repair of an inguinal hernia has more peer-reviewed published level one evidence than any other surgical disease to guide informed consent about management. The decision analysis of whether to perform laparoscopic or open inguinal hernia repair is dependant on many factors. Patient factors, hernia characteristics, surgeon experience and skill, resource utilization and patient-centered outcomes are variables influencing the technique offered to patients with inguinal hernias. This lecture will review prospective, randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic and open inguinal hernia repair. General principles to guide a patient-centered decision will be provided. S20 IP-12558 Is there a role for tissue-based inguinal hernia repair in adults? Voeller G University of Tennessee Health Science Center It is ony in recent surgical history (the last 30 years) that the repair of inguinal hernia has become dominated by the use of mesh. Over 100 years ago Edoardo Bassini proposed his physiologic reconstruction of the inguinal canal. In the USA the classic Bassini repair was rarely done and was corrupted to an approximation of the transversus arch to the shelving portion of varying rates of success but the Shouldice repair, which is a Bassini repair with continuous sutures rather than interrupted, has predominated. While the Shouldice Clinic in Canada claimed a very low recurrence rate these excellent results were not always replicated by other attempting the repair. This discrepancy has been attributed to the fact that the Clinic is solely focused on hernia repair and has a very standard approach that is very repeatable. Mesh based repairs have significant risks including infertility, infection, erosion and chronic, incapacitating pain. These problems are rarely seen with the Shouldice repair. Some surgeons have a tailored approach to inguinal hernia repair is ideal and allows the best repair to be used for each situation. More commonly today however most believe that each surgeon should learn one technique well and apply it to the majority of the repairs they do. When one looks at the issues involved with mesh based repair of inguinal hernia an argument can be made that there is and should be a role for tissue based repair of inguinal hernia in certain adult patients. Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S19-S20 IP-12598 Is laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair an advanced minimally invasive technique? Credentialing, training and quality assessment Bittner J Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine Laparoscopy has an important role to play in the management of inguinal hernia; however, the laparoscopic approach is used in only a small fraction of inguinal hernia repairs in the United States. A relatively low utilization rate for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair is the result of multiple factors, but learning and mastering the laparoscopic techniques seem to be one of them. The appreciable learning curve for these advanced laparoscopic procedures may be shortened by the use of structured curricula, simulation-based training and assessment, and appropriate proctorship. Credentialing bodies that grant surgeon privileges for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair should ensure competency in the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery through validated training programs and assessment tools as well as verify proficiency with each technique through tracking of clinical outcomes. The goals of this session are to highlight some of the curricula, simulation-based tools, and assessments used to teach and validate proficiency in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Also, the session will discuss qualitative assessment and its potential impact on credentialing for these challenging procedures. Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S21 ABSTRACTS Thursday, March 13, 2014 Session 5A: Expert debates: Ventral hernia repair: this is the ideal location for mesh placement © Springer-Verlag 2014 IP-12559 Onlay repair after primary fascial closure IP-12571 Underlay retrorectus or preperitoneal repair Voeller G University of Tennessee Health Science Center Poulose B Vanderbilt University Medical Center In the 1980s George Wantz brought the Rives retrorectus repair from France to the United States. We were taught this repair during a visit by Dr. Wantz at that time and at a time when the majority of repairs for V/I hernia in the United States were done as an inlay. Like Dr. Wantz, we became big proponents of the Rives repair. When we developed and taught our laparoscopic approach for V/I hernia in 1991 we used our experience with the Rives repair as a foundation. With the explosion of the laparoscopic technique in the 1990s the Rives open repair became known to American surgeons and over the past 20 years became the open procedure of choice for many hernia surgeons. At the same time Rives was developing his sublay approach in France, Chevrel, also in France, developed his onlay repair for ventral incisional hernia. Dr. Chevrel had a unique closure of the midline followed by only use of polypropylene or polyester mesh that was sutured to the fascia. Dr. Chevrel did subsequent biomechanical studies showing the importance of the linea alba and what he believed were advantages of the onlay position of the mesh. Also as part of his repair he later added the use of fibrin glue over the midline closure to prevent disruption of the closure and immediately take stress off of that closure. Despite Chevrel’s excellent results (which were equal to Rives), in America his technique never has received much attention. Beginning in January 2010 we developed an onlay technique for ventral incisional hernia repair suing fibrin glue alone for mesh fixation. We will discuss some basic laboratory work performed regarding the onlay technique of mesh fixation with fibrin glue. In addition, we will describe the technique and some clinical results. The optimal position for mesh placement remains to be determined in ventral hernia repair. Intraperitoneal mesh remains the most common space for the repair of ventral hernias. However, complications such as adhesions and fistula formation can result from direct interaction between mesh prosthesis and bowel. Retrorectus or preperitoneal mesh placement offer an alternative to intraperitoneal mesh, potentially minimizing these issues. The advantages and disadvantages of this approach to ventral hernia repair are discussed. IP-12553 Sublay intraperitoneal repair with barrier coated mesh Kercher K Carolinas Medical Center Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S22 ABSTRACTS Thursday, March 13, 2014 Session 5B: International Hernia Collaboration: hernia consultation through social media © Springer-Verlag 2014 IP-12595 Distinguished panel – International Hernia Collaboration: hernia consultation through social media Jacob B Mount Sinai Hospital Social media platforms are powerful tools that, among many things, have the potential to help surgeons optimize the care they are delivering to their patients. Launched in late December 2012, the International Hernia Collaboration (IHC) is an rapidly expanding online Facebook Group representing just one type of a social media tool available to surgeons. Designed to help improve collaboration between all shareholders invested in the care of patients suffering from the disease of hernia, the IHC is allowing surgeons from over 38 countries to communicate in real time about complicated and routine patient care issues. Through this collaboration, improved is being delivered. At AHS 2014, we will demonstrate some of the unique features offered by the IHC. Through live case presentations, both nationally and internationally, the audience will be able to witness how the IHC can potentially improve actual patient care in real time. Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S23-S26 ABSTRACTS Thursday, March 13, 2014 Session 6A: Scientific session II © Springer-Verlag 2014 FP-186 A new methodology for abdominal wall biomechanical strain analysis Novacek V, Ignotz R, Dunn R, Turquier F France The purpose of this video is to demonstrate how Digital Image Correlation (DIC) system can record and examine biomechanical abdominal wall (AW) strain. It may serve as a tool to analyze current and alternative AW closure techniques for hypothetical biomechanical optimization and therefore potential clinical superiority. This method also offers the possibility of studying hernia repair technique that may result in optimal functional outcomes as well as the possibility to optimally design hernia closure devices (mesh). DIC is a 3D non-contact optical technique based on grey value digital images with a stochastic intensity pattern and can determine the displacements and strains of an object under load. Using two cameras, each object point is focused on a specific pixel in the image plane of the cameras. Knowing the orientation of the cameras with respect to each other, the position of each object point can be calculated by a correlation algorithm. In our experimental setup, the cameras on a tripod were placed above a post-mortem human subject lying in supine position. An insufflation needle and a pressure transducer were inserted to the abdomen. The needle was connected to a pump delivering air of up to 30 mm Hg. The transducer was connected to a data acquisition system synchronized with the image acquisition system controlling the cameras. Skin and fat of the anterior AW were carefully removed. The anterior AW was then covered with white make-up. A stochastic pattern of dots was created using a black spray paint. The AW was subsequently insufflated and its deformation and strain were recorded and analyzed. This methodology demonstrated reproducible early results in terms of tissue strain due to pressure load. Application to other AW models may provide insights leading to clinical advances in management of AW hernia repair. FP-12505 Endoscopic assisted mini open transhernial sublay repair of ventral and incisional hernias – Matched pair analysis of 300 cases of the German hernia registry Reinpold W Department of Surgery and Hernia Centre – Gross Sand Hospital Hamburg Introduction: Laparoscopic IPOM repair and open sublay repair are both established techniques for the cure of ventral and incisional hernias. IPOM meshes have to be fixated thoroughly with transmural sutures, staples or clips which carry the risk of additional adhesions and pain. Open sublay repair is associated with higher infection rates. Material and methods: We developed an endoscopic assisted “miniopen” transhernial technique for the total extraperitoneal repair of large ventral and incisional hernia: Via a 4 to 6cm incision the hernia sac is mobilized. Endoscopic assisted dissection of the hernia defect and extraperitoneal plane allows the implantation of large standard alloplastic meshes and anatomical reconstruction of the abdominal wall. The data of all patients were included in the German Hernia Registry and prospectively analysed. After one year all patients received a questionnaire and symptomatic patients were re-examined. A matched pair analysis with open sublay and laparoscopic IPOM patients of the German Hernia Registry was performed. Results: We report 300 cases of ventral and incisional hernias with an average defect size of 72 cm2, an average mesh size of 438 cm2, and a minimum overlap of 5 cm. The largest mesh was 45x30 cm. The hernia defect was closed in all operations. There were no bowel injuries. There were three large retromuscular hematomas which needed a surgical intervention. There were no infections. One year follow-up was 90.2%. Pain medication was stopped within a week in 92% of the patients. Conclusion: The endoscopic assisted “mini-open” transhernial sublay repair combines the advantages of minimal access surgery and the open Sublay-Rives-Stoppa operation. The technique allows the cure of large ventral and incisional hernias with low morbidity. S24 Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S23-S26 FP-182 One-year outcomes in a prospective, multicenter study of contaminated ventral hernia repairs using a biosynthetic material FP-12493 The effect of component separation for large open ventral hernia repair (OVHR) on post-operative physical activity Rosen M, Carbonell A, Cobb W, Bauer J, Jacobsen G, Matthews B, Poulose B, Selzer D, Goldblatt M, Rosman C Case Western Reserve Kim M, Oommen B, Ross S, Bradley J, Tsirline V, Belyansky I, Colavita P, Sing R, Heniford B, Augenstein V Department of Surgery, Division of GI and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC Purpose: Contaminated ventral hernias (CVH) have increased risk of postoperative infection and remain challenging to repair. Synthetic meshes, while durable, are not widely accepted as an option in contamination due to fear of chronic infections. Biologic meshes in CVH repair have not provided a long term solution. Use of biosynthetic material in the retro-rectus space with fascial closure may provide a more durable repair solution. In this study, we evaluated use of biosynthetic material in single-staged CVH repairs. Methods: Patients with CVH underwent repair with biosynthetic material placed in a sublay position following fascial closure. At follow-up, patients underwent examination and responded to health questionnaires. Results: Of 104 patients enrolled (42 men; mean age, 58 years; mean BMI, 28), 23% had clean-contaminated and 77% had contaminated wounds. Concomitant procedures included bowel surgery (n=65), fistula takedown (n=24), open wound (n=26), or removal of infected mesh (n=27). Twenty one surgical site infections occurred. Superficial surgical site infections (9) resolved with antibiotics. Deep infections (10) required percutaneous drainage (6), minor operative debridement (3), and wide debridement with partial mesh removal (1). Organ space infections (2) were from anastomotic leaks. Follow up is ongoing and was completed at 12 months (67%), and 24 months (14%), with a mean of 12±6 months. Ten hernia recurrences developed, of which 3 had reoperations. Time to recurrence was statistically earlier for subjects developing infections during the study (logrank p=0.007): 22.2% recurrence with infections versus 7.0% without infections. Mean 1-year EQ-5D visual analogue and SF-12 physical component scores improved over baseline values (p < 0.01); mental scores did not change. Conclusions: Our findings represent the first prospective multicenter study with evidence substantiating the efficacy of biosynthetic material for contaminated single stage ventral hernia repairs. Introduction: Components separation (CS) for repair of ventral hernia defects is believed to restore physiologic function of the abdominal wall, but the implications for postoperative physical activity are not well known. Methods: A prospective international hernia database (IHMR) was queried for patients who underwent OVHR for large hernias from October 2007 to July 2013 with (CS) and without CS (NoCS). Defects <200 cm2 were excluded. The Carolinas Comfort Scale was used to compare eight parameters of pre-operative and post-operative activity: lying, bending, sitting, performing activities of daily living, coughing, walking, climbing stairs and exercise. Demographics, operative details, complications and outcomes were evaluated by standard statistical methods, with significance defined as p<0.05. Results: Of 52 patients, 22 had CS. Demographics for CS and NoCS were similar: mean age 54.6±14.5 vs 55.3±13.6 years, male 39% vs 48%, mean BMI 33.4±9.0 vs 31.5±6.1 kg/m2. No differences were seen in patient comorbidities or hernia characteristics: defect size (333.3±119.0 vs 413.6±270.0 cm2), incision length (23.8±18 vs 16.5±12.9 cm), recurrent (37% vs 43%), and multiple defects (all p>0.05). Pre-operative CCS scores for pain and activity limitation were similar between groups. Mesh placement was similar: intraperitoneal (50% vs 50%); preperitoneal (36.7% vs 31.8%); retrorectus (13.3% vs 9.1%); mesh size and weight was also similar. Operative time was longer for CS (280±48 vs 231±38 min; p<0.05) but length of stay and complications, including wound and major systemic morbidity, were similar. At one-month follow-up, while pain was similar between groups, CS experienced more movement restriction (93.8% vs 57.9%; p=0.0221); however, by 6-month follow-up, this was no longer significant. Conclusion: Patients who have CS with OVHR experience simlar surgical outcomes but are more likely to have limitations in movement in the immediate post-operative period when compared to conventional mesh OVHR. Six months after surgery patients with large VH undergoing CS have equal outcomes to those undergo standard OVHR. Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S23-S26 FP-12520 Long-term quality of life (QOL) between TEP, TAPP and modified lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair (IHR): a two-year follow-up Ross S, Oommen B, Kim M, Belyansky I, Tsirline V, Colavita P, Walters A, Augenstein V, Heniford B Carolinas Medical Center, Dept. of Surgery, Division of Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgery Introduction: We have extensively studied post-operative outcomes and QOL in IHR according to operative technique. Herein, we report long-term follow-up data on QOL compared by surgical approach. Methods: The International Hernia Mesh Registry was queried for all IHR from 2007 to 2013. TEP, TAPP, and Modified Lichtenstein (ML) were included. Bilateral hernias were excluded. QOL at two years was the primary outcome and was measured by the Carolinas Comfort Scale, a hernia-specific symptoms index with symptomatic defined as “minimal but bothersome.” Outcomes were examined between IHR groups with standard statistical methods and logistic regression. Results: There were 1651 IHR included: 969 ML, 362 TAPP, and 320 TEP. Patients were similar between the ML, TAPP and TEP groups: average age (56.8±15.8 vs 55.8±15.3 vs 52.3±15.2 years), male (93.0% vs 92.1% vs 94.9%), BMI (26.0±3.7 vs 26.4±4.1 vs 26.8±19.3 kg/m2). Pre-operatively, they differed in the percentage of recurrent hernia (8.6% vs 9.7% vs 21.6%), inpatients (68.4% vs 54.4% vs 83.8%), local anesthesia (54.5% vs 0% vs 0%), and symptomatic pre-operative pain (54.2% vs 59.5% vs 69.1%); all p<0.05. There was no significant difference in the rate of post-operative complications (p>0.05). Overall 2-year follow-up was 68.0%. Hernia recurrence was similar (1.6% vs 1.4% vs 1.6, p>0.05). Symptomatic discomfort (8.1% vs 9.4% vs 12.3%), mesh sensation (10.5% vs 8.5% vs 12.1%), and movement limitation (4.5% vs 5.6% vs 7.2%) were not significantly different at two years (all p>0.05). Bivariate analysis found age, gender, recurrent hernia, anesthesia type, mesh fixation with glue, and pre-operative pain to be associated with symptomatic pain at two years. After controlling for these factors in multivariate analysis, there was no difference in QOL at 2 years between ML, TAPP and TEP. The factors that were independently associated with symptomatic pain at 2 years were surgery for recurrent hernia (OR 2.2, 1.2-3.9; p=0.008) and pre-operative pain (OR 2.1, 1.3-3.5; p=0.002). Conclusion: Long-term QOL after IHR is not affected by the surgical approach. Pre-operative pain and previous recurrence are the most influential factors to post-operative pain 2-years after IHR. These facts can be useful in counseling patients concerning choices of operative technique and QOL outcomes. S25 FP-11345 A new method of follow-up after inguinal hernia repair; validation of the Pinq-Phone Heuvel B, van Jarwaarde J, Wichers P, de Lange de Klerk E, Bonjer H, Dwars B VUMC, The Netherlands The most important long-term complications after inguinal hernia repair are chronic pain and recurrence. Previous follow-up studies showed that physical examination is the only reliable method of follow-up to detect recurrences. However, physical examination is laborious and time consuming. We designed a telephone questionnaire as a method of follow-up after inguinal hernia surgery; the PINQPHONE (Post-INguinal-repair-Questionnaire by telePHONE). The aim of this study is to validate the PINQ-PHONE in detecting both asymptomatic and symptomatic recurrences. Methods: This prospective study contained 300 randomly selected patients after inguinal hernia repair. All patients were contacted by telephone and the PINQ-PHONE was carried out. The PINQ-PHONE contains four elements; three questions and a do-it-yourself Valsalva manoeuvre. Subsequently, all patients were seen in clinic and physical examination (gold standard) was done. Findings: The majority (96%) was male and the mean age was 66 (range 26-93) years old. The mean interval between surgery and study inclusion was 58 (range 6-141) months. In five patients a recurrence was found. All of them scored positively for one or more elements of the PINQ-PHONE. Two-hundred-fifty-two patients scored negatively for all elements and none of them had a recurrence. The overall sensitivity was 1•00 and the overall specificity 0•86. Interpretation: This study validated the PINQ-PHONE. It is a reliable, practical and simple method of follow-up after inguinal hernia repair to detect both symptomatic and asymptomatic recurrences. S26 FP-178 One year results of prophylactic mesh placement during formation of an end-colostomy for prevention of parastomal hernia; The Dutch PREVENT-trial Brandsma H, Hansson B, Aufenacker T, Bleichrodt R, Rosman C Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands Background: A parastomal hernia (PSH) is an incisional hernia related to an enterostomy and is the most frequent complication after stoma formation; approximately 50% of all patients with a stoma develop a symptomatic PSH over time. Symptoms may range from mild abdominal pain to life-threatening obstruction and strangulation. The treatment of a parastomal hernia is notoriously difficult. Despite the use of a mesh recurrences up to 20% are published. Due to these results surgeons focus more and more on prevention. Methods: We conducted a large multicenter RCT in which augmentation of the abdominal wall with a retromuscular lightweight polypropylene mesh (treatment group) is compared to the traditional formation of a colostomy (control group). The incidence of a PSH, complications, cost-effectiveness and quality of life were measured. 150 patients (1:1 ratio) were included. Results: There was no difference between groups regarding demographics, predisposing factors and SF-36 Quality of life. Operating time was 26 minutes longer in the mesh group. There was no significant difference in postoperative infections and other morbidity and no mesh had to be removed. After one year stomacare problems did not differ between both groups. The von Korff pain score as well as the EQ-5D health questionnaire were similar in both groups after three months and one year. Sixteen patients had a parastomal hernia of which 12 in the non-mesh group (p=0.03). No difference was found in concomitant hernias. Conclusion: After one year of follow-up we can state that placement of a polypropylene mesh in a sublay position to prevent parastomal hernia is a save and feasible procedure with no increase in morbidity. After 12 months it significantly reduces the incidence of parastomal hernias. Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S23-S26 FP-12213 Laparoscopic repair of a paraduodenal hernia Cuenca A, Alvarez J, Iqbal A University of Florida Paraduodenal hernias are an uncommon to rare form of congenital malrotation whereby a segment of bowel fails to rotate properly and becomes trapped either within the mesenteric leaflet of the cecum (right sided) or the descending colon (left sided) during fixation of the mesentery to the peritoneum. There have been several published case reports by investigators that have successfully used laparoscopy to repair the paraduodenal hernias. We report the diagnosis and laparoscopic repair of a left sided paraduodenal hernia in a 33 year old woman that presented in a non-acute setting with 6-8 month history of intermittent severe abdominal pain. The patient received a CT scan during an episode which clearly demonstrated a left sided paraduodenal hernia and was referred to us for definitive management. The patient was electively taken to the OR for laparoscopic repair and was discharged on POD 2. The patient was seen in clinic 3 months after the procedure and was doing well. While a large trial comparing an open to a laparascopic technique is impossible in this clinical setting due to the rarity of this defect, there is a collection of case reports including this study that suggest that laparascopic repair of paraduodenal hernias is not only feasible but more importantly, safe. Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S27-S28 ABSTRACTS Thursday, March 13, 2014 Session 6B: Biomaterial science session I – Evidence based literature © Springer-Verlag 2014 IP-12549 Preclinical evaluation of biomaterials: material characterization and predictability of clinical performance Deeken C Washington University School of Medicine The composition of hernia repair materials has evolved over the years to include not only permanent polymers such as polypropylene, but also biologically-derived materials, absorbable polymers, and composites with anti-adhesive barrier layers. Surgeons must select an appropriate material for each hernia repair scenario from dozens of available materials. Greater mechanical strength is theoretically conferred through the use of high density or tightly knitted polymer fibers. However, this may result in greater inflammation and foreign body reaction once implanted. Recent mesh designs have employed lower density polymers with a more open knit structure in an effort to reduce inflammation and foreign body reaction, but the effect on mechanical properties is unknown. Until recently, the literature lacked a systematic evaluation of the physiomechanical characteristics of each type of hernia repair material and a rationale for the suitability of these materials for hernia repair applications. Thus, we determined the physiomechanical characteristics of thirty-eight (n=38) types of hernia repair materials and compared the results to theoretical requirements for hernia repair scenarios. Scanning electron microscopy, laser micrometry, suture retention testing, tear resistance testing, and ball burst testing were performed on all materials. In addition, differential scanning calorimetry and collagenase digestion assays were performed on all biological materials. Theoretical calculations dictated at least 20N suture retention and tear resistance strengths and at least 50N/cm ball burst strength to support “worst case” hernia repair scenarios. Out of 38 materials evaluated, 14 met all criteria, 18 failed to meet at least one criterion, and 6 failed to meet 2 or more criteria. IP-12547 Barrier coated mesh for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair Earle D Baystate Health Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair (LVHR) has significant advantages for select patients, but remains underutilized due to both technical factors and the complex nature of the mesh industry. The intraperitoneal placement of mesh during LVHR has spawned the development of a variety of products designed to minimize adhesions between the viscera and the mesh. Not all barrier coated mesh however is the same, and many factors must be considered when choosing a barrier coated mesh for LVHR. These factors include patient factors, clinical scenario factors, and a working knowledge of the physical properties of the underlying polymer and architecture of the mesh. While most surgeons are familiar with the concepts of light and heavy weight mesh, the lack of standard definitions of mesh weight and its meaning, as well as the development of a variety of composite mesh can make this difficult to sort out. This lecture will specifically address the fundamental principles of determining how to choose a barrier coated mesh for LVHR, and detail the currently available products. Real clinical cases, along with manufacturer information will be used to allow the surgeon to immediately incorporate this information in to practice as appropriate. S28 IP-12564 Biologic, absorbable synthetic or permanent mesh for laparoscopic paraesophageal and hiatal hernia repair Bittner J Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine Once the decision has been made to reinforce the hiatus during laparoscopic repair of a hiatus or paraesophageal hernia, the foregut surgeon must choose between various materials. To that end, the goals of this session are to discuss in some detail the biologic (porcine and human acellular dermal matrix, porcine small intestine submucosa), absorbable synthetic (glycolic acid/trimethylene carbonate, poly-4-hydroxybutyrate), and permanent synthetic mesh options (polypropylene, polyester composite, expanded polytetrafluoroethylene), currently available for use at the hiatus, elaborate on the potential risks and benefits of each, and review clinical outcomes data that may facilitate an informed decision. IP-12566 Lightweight mesh for open inguinal hernia repair: effect on recurrence, patient-centered outcomes Conze K, Muschaweck U Germany The results of lightweight meshes in inguinal hernia repair are not always consistent, sometimes even controversial. What do we consider a “lightweight” mesh? Is it really only a question of weight? In 2011 Coda et al. developed and published a classification for polypropylene meshes according to the mesh weight: Ultra-light <35 g/m2, Light 35-70 g/m2, Standard 70-140 g/m2 and Heavy >140 g/m2. The decision on the weight group limits were never explained and seem arbitrary. And is weight the only parameter? The terminology of the so called “lightweight” meshes is a misnomer and has proved to be not sufficient but misleading. Already in 2006 Wehye et al. showed that there must be more to it than the total weight, when he proved a significant decrease in biocompatibility for a lightweight but small pore almost foils-like mesh, compared to a heavyweight mesh. So there is more to it: we need to consider the pore size, the polymer and the filament construction. Klinge has introduced and established the term “porosity” into the mesh world and developed a classification accordingly. It is the effective porosity of meshes that defines the contact area between mesh surface and host. This is the essential factor for the degree of foreign body reaction, for the fibrogenous ingrowth and possible mesh related complications – not the weight! Therefore it is time to be more precise in evaluating the benefit of the so called “lightweight” meshes. Their description is misleading and should be abandoned. Unfortunately most studies and metaanalysis did not take mesh porosity into account. Today we should look at high porosity – low surface meshes when we want to evaluate this new mesh generation. Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S27-S28 IP-12551 Biologic mesh for abdominal wall reconstruction Van Goor H Radbound University Medical Center, The Netherlands Biologic grafts have been introduced in ventral hernia repair as an alternative to synthetic mesh for complex hernia with a contaminated or infected operation area. Biologic grafts hold promise of a durable repair with less adhesion formation and lower infection propensity compared to synthetic mesh due to their biocompatible nature. However, proper evidence for use of these biologic grafts is scant and study results vary markedly. Against the background of the high financial price of biologic grafts proof of safety and efficacy is needed for surgeons, patients and health care providers. In this lecture, results are presented of a systematic review summarising and evaluating the use of biologic prostheses for ventral hernia repair under clean and contaminated conditions, with focus on recurrence and complications. It appeared that the quality of evidence for use of biologic grafts for ventral hernia repair was low: many authors grouped different types of ventral hernias (e.g. primary and incisional) together, along with varying sizes and locations, and all the studies included in the current review were of a retrospective nature. It was concluded that the current evidence regarding recurrence and morbidity does not support the routine use of biologic grafts for clean, contaminated, dirty or otherwise complicated ventral hernia repair at the moment. Future research should focus on i) adoption of a universal classification system for ventral hernias helping to decrease the heterogeneity of study groups and on ii) designing proper prospective studies with well defined and clinically relevant outcomes, to better delineate the indication (s) for a biological graft in ventral hernia repair. Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S29 ABSTRACTS Thursday, March 13, 2014 Session 7: AHS Journal Club: articles all hernia surgeons should know © Springer-Verlag 2014 Paper #1: Long term follow up of a randomized controlled trial of suture vs mesh repair of incisional hernia (Annals of Surgery 2004) Jeekel J The Netherlands Paper #2: Effect of stitch length on wound complications after closure of midline incisions: a randomized controlled trial (Arch Surg 2009) Carbonell A Greenville Health System Paper #3: Randomized, controlled, blinded trial of tisseel/tissucol for mesh fixation in patients undergoing lichtenstein technique for primary inguinal hernia repair: results of the TIMELI trial (Ann Surg 2012) Campanelli G University of Insurbia, Italy Paper #4: Comparison of laparoscopic and open repair with mesh for the treatment of ventral incisional hernia: A randomized trial (Arch Surg 2010) Matthews B Carolinas Medical Center Paper #5: Randomized clinical trial comparing suture and mesh repair of umbilical hernia in adults (Br J Surg 2001) Pierce R Duke University Paper #6: A randomized, double-blind, placebocontrolled trial to determine effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis for tension-free mesh herniorrhaphy (J Am Coll Surg 2005) Adrales G Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S30 ABSTRACTS Thursday, March 13, 2014 Session 8: Humanitarianism: honoring those who serve others © Springer-Verlag 2014 IP-12599 Operation hernia Kingsnorth A Peninsula College of Medicine & Dentistry, Plymouth, UK Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S31-S32 ABSTRACTS Friday, March 14, 2014 Session 9: Instruction through video: laparoscopic and open hernia repair © Springer-Verlag 2014 IP-12563 Myofascial release: Rives-Stoppa and posterior component separation/TAR IP-137 Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: defect closure, positioning systems, myofascial release Phillips M University of Tennessee Health Science Center Novitsky Y University Hospitals Case Medical Center As the patients and hernia characteristics continue to become more complex, we must as surgeons continue to evolve our techniques to overcome these growing challenges. Myofascial release techniques have been described in multiple formats as solid ways to repair both initial and recurrent hernias. The Rives-Stoppa, or retro-rectus, technique has the option to be the “work horse” for many hernias, providing an easily teachable, reliable repair with a low complication profile. This technique can be applied to most midline hernias with transverse fascial defects up to 8cm. In hernias with a transverse fascial defect greater than 8cm, a posterior component separation or transversus abdominus release (TAR) offers an alternative to the standard anterior component separation or external oblique release. The TAR has a lower rate of wound complications when compared to the anterior approach while allowing primary fascial reapproximation of similar size defects. Additionally, it can be applied to the nonmidline hernia, making it ideal for flank or subcostal needs. The surgical technique as well as pearls of each repair will be detailed in this video-based session. As no patient’s hernia is identical, it is important to have multiple technique options so that the repair can be customized for each individual. IP-166 Anterior component separation release: open ramirez and endoscopic techniques Roth J University of Kentucky Medical Center Abdominal wall reconstruction for complex and complicated hernias is performed with increasing frequency to facilitate apposition of the rectus abdominis muscles. Benefits of abdominal wall reconstruction include a functional abdominal wall with reduced laxity and bulging. The initial descriptions of component separation techniques involved posterior rectus sheath release, subcutaneous skin flaps, and division of the external oblique aponeurosis. This traditional technique allows for rectus abdominis muscle advancement, although wound complications are not infrequent due to devascularization of the ventral abdominal wall skin. Perforator preserving techniques have been described in an attempt to reduce wound complications while allowing for comparable abdominal wall advancement. The endoscopic component separation technique allows for abdominal wall advancement with preservation of all abdominal wall vasculature. The “interoblique” technique is performed by dissecting the space between the external and internal oblique muscles with subsequent division of the external oblique muscle. The endoscopic approach allows for comparable advancement to traditional Ramirez component separation techniques with significantly reduced morbidity. S32 IP-161 Laparoscopic paraesophageal and type I hiatal hernia repair Stoikes N University of Tennessee Health Science Center Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair contains many technical considerations, some of which are controversial. Hallmarks of work up first include the assessment of symptoms such as: heartburn, dysphagia, chest pain, shortness of breath, and regurgitation. Pertinent diagnostic tests include barium swallow and manometry. The key technical steps involve: reduction of the stomach and hernia sack, mobilization of the greater curve of the stomach, creation of a retroesophageal window, crural repair, and fundoplication. Controversy within the technique revolves around the use of mesh for the crural repair and type of fundoplication (or not). There is literature to support the use of mesh as well as not using mesh for hernia repair. Mesh options for repair include biologics or absorbable synthetics. Fixation when using mesh also varies and includes sutures, tacks, or fibrin glue depending on what type of mesh is selected. Fundoplication choice should be determined based on the results of manometry, which is recommended in all cases. Finally, a key feature of successful paraesophageal hernia repair is adequate intrabdominal esophageal length. In some cases collis gastroplasty or wedge fundectomy may be necessary in select cases. IP-159 Laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair LeBlanc K Surgeons Group of Baton Rouge Introduction: Parastomal hernias represent a difficult challenge for both the patient and the surgeons that treat them. The re-location method and the simple primary closure of these hernias have a significant rate of recurrence. Newer laparoscopic methods appear to have improved the long-term results of these hernia repairs. Technique: The current method that I employ involves a three-step approach during the laparoscopic repair. The initial repair involves the primary closure of the defect. An onlay of a bioresorbable material is then placed over the closure to reinforce the fascial. The intestine is then lateralized and covered with an ePFTE based prosthetic material. Results: Fifteen consecutive patients have undergone this approach over a three year period. Two patients (5.5%) required a return to the operating room due to obstruction secondary to an undersized passageway underneath the onlay mesh. A transfascial suture was released in each case. One patient (6.67%) developed a late mesh infection of a prior incisional hernia repair (unrelated to the parastomal hernia repair). This required excision of all of the meshes and an ultimate recurrence of the hernia. Other than this patient, there has been one recurrence in these individuals (6.67%). This patient gained approximately 50 pounds of weight subsequent to the procedure and this appears to have been an inciting factor in the recurrence. Conclusion: With a recurrence rate of approximately 13%, this method of repair appears to be an acceptable choice for the repair of this difficult hernia. More time is needed to assure the success of this hernioplasty. Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S31-S32 IP-12591 Laparoscopic TAPP and TEP inguinal hernia repair Abdalla R University of Sao Paulo, Brazil Introduction: Since the beginning of inguinal hernia treatment, surgeons are looking forward the ideal solution. Video surgery for abdominal wall hernias is turning down its controversy; despite it has been done in specialized institutions of minimally invasive surgery. Brazil had its development restricted because of investments, but nowadays all the Hospitals are improving it. The tension free concept was introduced by the method and mesh became an obligation. The mesh could suggest a more aggressive condition but, because of it, treatment became less traumatic, with better recovery, without persistent pain. Video surgery could reveal a complex defect and clarify the way for abdominal wall reconstruction. Two methods can reach the origin of defect, Trans Abdominal pre Peritoneal (TAPP) Laparoscopic Hernioplasty and Total Extra Peritoneal (TEP) Laparoscopic Hernioplasty. Today there is a tendency to indicate TEP. Consensual conduct or best practice protocols are difficult because of characteristics multiplicity from hernia presentations. Reviewing more than 12,000 patients, the Cochrane Collaboration concluded that regarding TEP vs TAPP, there were NO differences for recurrence rates, vascular injuries, and OR time. TEP led to more conversions overall and might be harder to learn. On the contrary, TAPP procedures led to slightly more intraabdominal adhesions, trocar site hernias, and visceral injuries. Today, treatment algorithms remain surgeon dependent. Compared to other techniques, TEP has been associated with quicker return to daily activities, better Quality of Life outcomes, less acute and chronic pain complaints and less intraabdominal morbidities. TAPP has been shown to be very effective in experienced hands and is easier to teach. Conclusion: For all inguinals and recurrences, TEP is an optimal choice. TAPP should be considered at incarceration or strangulation, scrotal hernias, inguinodynia, recurrence and in women with Pfannenstiel incision. Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S33-S35 ABSTRACTS Friday, March 14, 2014 Session 10A: Scientific session III © Springer-Verlag 2014 FP-214 Suprapubic hernia repair with a rectus femoris flap Petro C, Armstrong B, Soltanian H, Rosen M University Hospitals Case Medical Center Introduction: A 45-year-old male presents with a large suprapubic hernia, loss of domain and frequent obstructive symptoms. His history is notable for bladder sarcoma at age 4 requiring neoadjuvant radiation followed by a cystectomy and ileal conduit. As a consequence of this radiation he developed a rectal cancer requiring further neoadjuvant radiation and a low anterior resection. After his loop ileostomy reversal he developed this suprapubic hernia that was repaired more than four times with biologic and intraperitoneal synthetic mesh which ultimately became infected due to skin breakdown, required explantation and led to recurrence. Methods: The plan was made for open incisional hernia repair using a posterior components separation and transversus abdominis muscle (TAR) release with permanent synthetic (polypropylene) mesh sublay and pelvic bone fixation. Due to his history of radiation and thin subcutaneous tissue, it was felt that a rectus femoris myocutanous flap would be necessary for anterior coverage of the mesh. Results: The patient developed a fluid collection post-operatively which required drainage by interventional radiology and grew MRSA. For this he remained on antibiotics for 37 days. He has now been off all antibiotics for two months, his donor site has healed and 100% of his graft has taken. He is very happy with his repair. Conclusion: TAR with synthetic mesh sublay and pelvic bone mesh fixation is suitable for suprapubic hernia repair. When soft tissue coverage of mesh cannot be easily obtained, flap coverage is critical and can lead to a successful outcome. FP-200 Outcomes of transversus abdominis muscle release (TAR) with synthetic mesh sublay for abdominal wall reconstruction Orenstein S, Petro C, Criss C, Raigani S, Elliott H, Rosen M, Novitsky Y University Hospitals Case Medical Center Introduction: Posterior component separation for complex abdominal wall reconstructions (AWR) is gaining in popularity. Although our early experience with transversus abdominis muscle release (TAR) has been promising, long-term outcomes in a large cohort of patients have not been reported to date. Herein, we aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of TAR with retrorectus synthetic mesh reinforcement in a large series of complex hernia patients. Methods: From 2006 to 2013, consecutive patients undergoing open retromuscular AWR utilizing the TAR approach were identified in the prospectively maintained database and reviewed. Main outcome measures included demographics, perioperative details, wound complications and recurrences. Typical follow-up assessment includes a physical exam at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months and computed tomography at 6-12 months postoperatively. Results: Two hundred fifty-two consecutive TAR procedures were analyzed. The mean age was 56; mean BMI was 36 kg/m2 (range: 20-65 kg/m2). Major co-morbidities included diabetes (23%), COPD (17%), and smoking (7%). Mean hernia defect width was 17 cm (range: 8-38 cm) and area 416 cm2 (range: 100-1,520 cm2). Mean mesh size was 1,205cm2 (range: 180-3,600 cm2). The majority of cases were clean, with 28 (11.1%) being clean-contaminated and 14 (5.6%) being contaminated. Fifty-six patients (22.2%) developed a surgical site occurrence, 32 (12.7%) of which were surgical site infections. Seven patients required re-operations/debridement but there were no instances of mesh explantation. At a mean follow-up of 12 months (range: 3-76 months) there have been 11 recurrences (4.4%). Conclusions: Complex AWR represents a formidable surgical challenge. In this large series we demonstrated that posterior component separation using transversus abdominis release with wide synthetic mesh sublay provides a very durable repair with low morbidity, even in comorbid patients with large defects. We strongly advocate TAR as a durable addition to the armamentarium of reconstructive surgeons. S34 FP-133 TEP and Lichtenstein anatomy – Does simulation accelerate acquisition among interns? Rowse P, Ruparel R, Abdelsaatar J, AlJamal Y, Farley D Mayo Clinic Introduction: The anatomy of the inguinal region is notoriously challenging to master. We sought to teach open inguinal hernia (OIH) and total extraperitoneal (TEP) anatomy with simulation models among general surgery (GS) interns. Methods: Low-fidelity OIH and TEP models were constructed out of cardboard, plastic bins, fabric, and yarn. GS interns (n=30) participated in a 3-hour hernia session including a pretest, anatomy lecture, simulated hernia repair with OIH and TEP models, individual oral exam, and posttest. Pre and posttest scores were based on a difficult 30-point exam. Participants were surveyed anonymously using a 5-point Likert scale (1= strongly disagree, 5= strongly agree). Results: Median pretest scores were 13% (range 0-60%). Median posttest scores improved to 47% (range 20-93%, p<0.001). Median scores for knowledge of TEP anatomy improved from 2 (range 014) to 11 (range 1-21, p<0.001). Median scores for knowledge of OIH anatomy improved from 3 (range 0-15) to 7 (range 1-19, p<0.001). 67% (12/18) demonstrated improvement in knowledge of abdominal wall layers. 23% (7/30) knew the triangles of pain/doom and could identify their contents on pretest vs 77% (23/30) on posttest. Location of hernia recurrence for OIH and TEP was known in 27% (8/30) and 7% (2/30) on pretest vs 93% (28/30) and 43% (13/30) on posttest, respectively. Survey response was 100%. Mean Likert scores for session enjoyability (4.5), improved understanding of TEP and OIH anatomy (4.2, 4.4), and “not a waste of training time” (4.4) rated highest. Trainees felt deliberate practice with TEP and OIH models would improve surgical skill (4.5, 4.4). TEP and OIH models were acceptable with regard to realism (4.1, 3.9). Conclusion: Low-fidelity simulators can be used to teach and assess knowledge of TEP and OIH anatomy. While enjoyable and useful, one three hour session does not create master hernia surgeons out of novice trainees. Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S33-S35 FP-148 A multicenter randomized controlled trial evaluating the effect of small stitches on the long-term incidence of incisional hernia after midline laparotomy (Stitch-trial) Deerenberg E, Harlaar J, Lont H, Van Doorn H, Wijnhoven B, Schouten W, Cense H, Stockmann H, Berends F, Dijkhuizen F Erasmus University Medical Center Background: Incisional hernia is one of the most frequent complications after midline laparotomy, associated with morbidity, a decreased quality of life and high costs. Methods: We randomly assigned patients who underwent a midline laparotomy to either a standardized small bites suture technique of the fascia or to a conventional large bites (mass closure) suture technique. Primary outcome was the clinical and/or radiological occurrence of an incisional hernia after at least one year follow-up. Results: 560 patients from 9 hospitals (surgical and gynecological departments) were enrolled in the trial, 549 of whom were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. In the small bites group the fascia was sutured with more stitches (45 versus 25), a higher suture length to wound length ratio (5.03 versus 4.37) and closing took more time (14 versus 10 minutes; all p<0.001). Short-term postoperative complications, such as surgical site infection, burst abdomen and hospital stay did not differ in incidence between both groups. During one year follow-up 11 patients were lost to follow-up, 84 patients needed a relaparotomy and 65 patients died. The incidence of incisional hernia in the large bites group was 23.6% (66 out of 279) and in the small bites group 14.4% (39 out of 270)after a mean follow-up of 13.5 months (SD 5.34), log rank test p=0.014. Thecovariate adjusted hazard ratio was 0.66 (95% Confidence Interval 0.44-0.99, p=0.048). Conclusion: Suturing the fascia of an abdominal midline incision with a continuous small bites technique reduces the long-term incidence of the incisional hernia with 34% and merits wide application. (Funded by a Efficiency Research Grant ErasmusMC and Ethicon Inc.; Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01132209) Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S33-S35 FP-113 Long acting local anesthesia for groin hernia repair with a new product: liposomal bupivacaine. A preliminary study of efficacy for reduction of post-operative pain Young J, Gilbert A Hernia Institute of Florida Background: Multimodal anesthesia for control of peri-operative pain during out-patient inguinal hernia repair is increasing in popularity. To date, there has been no effective long acting injectable local anesthetic preparation to extend pain control through the post-operative period. Bupivacaine liposomal injectable solution - depo-bupivacaine (DB) (Exparel®; Pacira Pharmaceuticals Inc, Parsippany, NJ) is an injectable preparation of bupivacaine encapsulated in lipid particles which allows for extended release of the anesthetic. DB has been used successfully for post-operative pain control after other surgical procedures. We present our experience demonstrating efficacy of DB for pain control after inguinal hernia repair. Methods. From January to April, 2013, 116 consecutive patients had open inguinal hernia repairs under local anesthesia with intravenous sedation, with or without the use of DB. Post-operative VAS pain scores were recorded at five time periods after the surgery: recovery room, day of surgery, and 1st, 2nd, and 3rd postoperative days. The number of opioid pain tablets taken in the three days after surgery was recorded. The pharmacology and technique for injection is described. Results: There were 60 patients in the treatment group and 56 patients in the control group. Pain scores in the treatment group were significantly reduced (mean - 3.0 vs 4.1: p=0.0002) at all five time periods. There was a significant reduction in the number of narcotic pain tablets taken by the DB group (3.7 vs 5.9: p=0.0025) in the post-operative period. Conclusion: This study demonstrates the efficacy of a new long lasting local anesthetic product (DB) for controlling post-operative pain after inguinal hernia repair. The findings are consistent with studies of the efficacy of DB in other procedures. DB is a new medication which will have a significant impact in the peri-operative pain management of surgical patients. S35 FP-220 A novel intervention for augmenting postoperative urination in patients undergoing laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair Wormer B, Ross S, Walters AL, Kuwada T Carolinas Medical Center Introduction: Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) following laparoscopic inguinal hernia (LIH) is a costly and uncomfortable complication. Rapid bladder filling from excessive intra-op IVF has been associated with POUR. We hypothesized that filling the bladder prior to foley removal would augment postoperative voiding and decrease the time to discharge (TTD) and incidence of POUR. Methods: Review of a prospective, single surgeon, consecutive series of LIH (TEP and TAP) from 2010 to 2013. All patients were catheterized during LIH. Prior to catheter removal, selected patients had a 200 cc saline “bladder fill” (BF). Patients were required to void >250 cc prior to discharge. POUR was defined as catheter reinsertion (residual >400 cc). POUR incidence and TTD were compared between the BF and No-BF groups. Results: LIH was performed in 175 patients (70% TEP), of those 89 (50%) underwent BF and 86 (49%) No-BF. Demographics, type of defect and repair, OR IVF and time, narcotics and prostate disease/medications were similar between the BF and No-BF groups (p>0.05). The BF group had a lower incidence of POUR (10% vs 15% for no-BF), but this was not significant (p=0.32). BF yielded a significantly shorter TTD (222 min vs 286 min for No-BF; p<0.01). On univariate analysis, patients with POUR had higher rates of BPH (36% vs 10%; p<0.01), direct hernias (59% vs 28%; p<0.01), and were older (65±11 yrs vs 55±14 yrs; p<0.01). However on multivariate analysis, increased odds of POUR was only associated with BPH medication use (OR 13.2, CI 3.1-56.2; p<0.05) and direct hernia (OR 6.9, CI 2.0-24.1; p<0.05). The only postoperative UTI was in the No-BF group. Conclusion: In our study, postoperative BF reduced the incidence of POUR and time to discharge by over an hour; challenging the widely held belief that rapid bladder filling increases the risk of POUR. To our knowledge, this is the first description of BF in LIH. BF has the potential to substantially reduce the cost and morbidity of POUR and warrants further prospective study. Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S36 ABSTRACTS Friday, March 14, 2014 Session 10B: Athletic pubalgia © Springer-Verlag 2014 IP-154 Epidemiology and pathoanatomy of athletic pubalgia Jacobsen G University of California, San Diego Groin pain in the athlete is challenging entity which deserves specific attention to the etiology of the pain as well as specific anatomic considerations. To this end a review of the current data on the epidemiology of athletic pubalgia will be taken with specific attention paid to individual sporting activities. Attention will also be directed to the commonly associated pathoanatomic problems encountered in athletes performing at the elite level, and the methods of identifying these entities. IP-12573 Examination and imaging characteristics in a patient with athletic pubalgia Matthews B Carolinas Medical Center Athletic pubalgia (sports hernia) is a syndrome of chronic lower abdomen and groin pain that typically occurs in athletes. The lower abdomen and groin area is at extreme risk of chronic overuse injury caused during sports activities such as hockey, soccer, football and rugby. Repeated trauma and overuse of the groin area associated with repeated turning and twisting movements are often responsible to promote force imbalances of pubic symphysis and pubic bones that pressurize the posterior wall of inguinal canal. This can cause a disruption of the inguinal canal resulting in tearing and weakness of abdominal tissues and muscles which also pulls away tendons, ligaments and muscles from pubic bone. Nevertheless, the differential diagnosis of chronic lower abdomen and groin pain is quit broad in athletes and nonathletes, respectively. A comprehensive examination with a focus on the abdomen and groin with appropriate imaging differentiate athletic pubalgia from other conditions causing lower abdominal and groin pain. This lecture will review examination techniques and findings as well as imaging charactericstics in patients with athletic pubalgia. IP-12552 Nonoperative and operative treatment strategies in a patient with athletic pubalgia Brunt L Washington University School of Medicine Athletic pubalgia or also known as Sport’s hernia has been an increasing problem in high performance athletes over the last two decades. Unlike many athletic groin injuries, these do not often resolve with conservative management and surgical intervention, therefore, may be required to get the athlete back to play. Surgery should be reserved for failure of conservative management which consists of rest, ice, abdominal core strengthening and stretching and strengthening exercises for the lower body. Athletes who have failed conservative management and have appropriate physical exam and imaging findings are appropriate for surgical repair. A variety of surgical options exist including different open primary tissue repairs, tension free mesh repairs and laparoscopic approaches. In this talk the various operative treatment strategies will be discussed and presented as well as conservative management and postoperative physical rehabilitation approaches. Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S37 ABSTRACTS Friday, March 14, 2014 Session 11: Complication management: morbidity conference at the Americas Hernia Society © Springer-Verlag 2014 IP-12594 Distinguished panel – Complication management: morbidity conference at the Americas Hernia Society Harold K Mayo Clinic Hernia operations have known complications. Discuss techniques for avoiding complications and how to manage them when they occur with a panel of experts. An array of topics will be covered such as “Avoiding/ managing enterotomy during laparoscopic ventral hernia repair”, “Managing Chronic Seroma”, “Managing mesh infection following laparoscopic ventral hernia repair”, “Avoiding and treating groin pain after inguinal hernia repair”, “Managing enterocutaneous fistula in the setting of prosthetic biomaterials”. Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S38-S39 ABSTRACTS Friday, March 14, 2014 Session 12A: Hernia emergencies for the on call general surgeon © Springer-Verlag 2014 IP-12561 Incarcerated umbilical hernia in a morbidly obese 56 year old male Doerhoff C SurgiCare of Missouri A 56-year old white male, 73 inches in height, weighing 405 pounds, a BMI of 55, presents with 8-hour history of umbilical pain, nausea and vomiting: He has a tender non-reducible hernia at the umbilicus. CT scan shows defect to be 4 cm and contains small bowel. His white count is 14,000. He has COPD and is on C-Pap. He is an insulin-dependent diabetic. He’s a smoker. He’s on Coumadin for a history of DVT/PE. What are your treatment options? Open repair vs laparoscopic repair? What additional co-morbidities would change your plan? Which factors influence your decision for your choice of mesh? What additional post operative concerns might you anticipate? Post operative pain management? IP-135 Strangulated femoral hernia in a 82 year old female resident of a nursing home Schuricht A Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania A discussion of surgical options for the treatment of femoral hernias will be presented. This will include a discussion of anatomic considerations, hernia incidence and clinical presentation. Imaging will be discussed as appropriate. A review of historical approaches to femoral hernia repair will be given, including the risks and benefits of the various approaches. The discussion will enable the surgeon to confidently treat a patient with a femoral hernia in an emergency situation. IP-12580 Incarcerated recurrent ventral incisional hernia in a 55 year old diabetic female with possible mesenteric ischemia Greenberg J University of Wisconsin This case represents one of the many challenges facing the on-call general surgeon. As the obesity epidemic continues, recurrent hernias in diabetic obese patients will likely become increasingly common occurrences. When intestinal perfusion is compromised in this setting the decision making becomes even more complex. The utilization of mesh in this context is fraught with multiple potential complications yet hernia recurrence without mesh is highly likely. Additionally, the timing of abdominal closure will factor into the surgical decision making as well. This presentation will review the treatment options for patients with mesenteric ischemia complicated by a recurrent incisional hernia. Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S38-S39 S39 IP-138 Incarcerated inguinal hernia in a 62 year-old male with a small bowel obstruction IP-163 Internal hernia in a 26 year old female 6 months after laparoscopic gastric bypass Tessier D Kaiser Foundation Hospital Fontana Goldblatt M Medical College of Wisconsin Acute incarceration occurs in approximately 0.29 to 2.9% of all hernia presentations in large retrospective studies. Approximately 1015% of incarcerated hernias will have necrotic bowel requiring resection on exploration. Because males more commonly have inguinal hernias they comprise the majority of the group. Women, however, typically present with incarcerated femoral hernias. Strangulated femoral hernias comprise up to 35% of all strangulated hernias. Treatment options in the emergency room include manual reduction with sedation if no evidence of strangulation and then observation. If unable to be reduced the patient should be emergently taken to the operating room for hernia repair as duration of incarceration increase likelihood of strangulation and increases mortality. Operative strategies were limited prior to mesh and laparoscopy. Small retrospective studies and non-randomized studies have shown that even in the presence of strangulation both mesh and laparoscopy can be used depending on the overall health of the health of the patient and characteristics of the hernia. The number of patients who have undergone Roux en Y gastric bypass continues to grow. One of the most common late surgical complications in these patients is an internal hernia, where a mesenteric defect allows small bowel to possibly strangulate. These hernias can range from subtle in both symptoms and radiographic findings to an acute abdomen with risk to the bowel. In a tertiary center, these patients are often taken care of by Bariatric surgeons, but at community hospitals, the on-call General Surgeon will need to evaluate and treat. This presentation will review the work up for a bariatric patient in the Emergency Department as well as treatment options. IP-12589 Umbilical hernia with epidermal erosion and ascites leak in a 44 year old male with cirrhosis Roth J University of Kentucky Medical Center Abdominal wall hernias in the cirrhotic patient represent a significant challenge. The physiologic derangements of cirrhosis may result in thrombocytopenia, coagulopathy, portal hypertension, hyperbilirubinemia, encephalopathy, hypo-albuminemia, malnutrition and ascites. While asymptomatic reducible umbilical hernias in the cirrhotic patient allow the surgeon time for medical optimization, those with epidermal erosions and ascetic leaks require prompt attention. Considerations to the all sequelae of cirrhosis and liver dysfunction are paramount. Perioperative techniques for managing ascites include paracentesis, abdominal drains, diuretics, and shunting procedures. The immediacy of the patient presentation directly impacts medical and surgical options. Incarcerated hernias with threatened intestines require urgent surgical intervention with careful peri-operative care as well as postoperative optimization while hernias not involving the viscera with an associated ascitic leak may allow for either non-operative management or preoperative optimization. An algorithmic approach to the cirrhotic with a ruptured umbilical hernia will be presented. Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S40-S41 ABSTRACTS Friday, March 14, 2014 Session 12B: Expert debates: Fixation for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair © Springer-Verlag 2014 IP-164 Mechanical nonabsorbable fixation IP-12565 Mechanical absorbable fixation Cobb W Greenville Health System Miserez M University Hospital, Leuven, Belgium With the recent focus on advances in technique and mesh constructs, the long-term morbidity following inguinal hernia repair has shifted from recurrence to inguinodynia. The incidence of post-herniorrhaphy chronic groin pain is poorly defined and underreported. In meta-analyses, the laparoscopic approach demonstrates a consistent reduction in the incidence of inguinodynia. The posterior preperitoneal approach to the myopectineal orifice avoids the sensory nerves of the inguinal region. However, the dissection of the preperitoneal space must be meticulous, and the placement of mechanical fixation should be judicious to avoid causing potential pain. The dilemma surrounding fixation of mesh in the inguinal space is a balance between secure mesh ingrowth to minimize recurrence and pain from the fixation itself. Mechanical fixation constructs can be permanent or absorbable. Prospective studies have demonstrated no improvement in postoperative pain with absorbable vs permanent fixation. The associated trauma from placement of fixation is similar whether the tack is permanent or absorbable. Most of the absorbable devices do not resorb for close to one year anyway. Efforts to avoid the trauma of mechanical fixation have been made. Fibrin sealants and tissue glues have been utilized. Mesh constructs have been designed to have self-fixating points, and some authors argue that no fixation is necessary at all. All of these methods potentially sacrifice secure mesh fixation, particularly with large indirect and direct defects. Reduction in chronic pain using these methods has not been well established. Mechanical nonabsorbable fixation for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair provides the most consistent mesh security with minimal longterm pain when used judiciously. The data will be reviewed to support this statement. Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S40-S41 S41 IP-12555 Fibrin sealants IP-141 Self adherent mesh Campanelli G University of Insubria, Italy Jacob B Mount Sinai Hospital Objective: Test the hypothesis that fibrin sealant mesh fixation can reduce the incidence of postoperative pain/numbness/groin discomfort by up to 50% compared with sutures for repair of inguinal hernias using the Lichtenstein technique. Background: Inguinal hernia repair is the most common procedure in general surgery, thus improvements in surgical techniques, which reduce the burden of undesirable postoperative outcomes, are of clinical importance. Methods: A randomized, controlled, patient- and evaluator-blinded study (Tissucol/Tisseel for MEsh fixation in LIchtenstein hernia repair [TIMELI]) was conducted among patients eligible for Lichtenstein repair of uncomplicated unilateral primary inguinal small-medium sized hernia. Patients were subject to mesh fixation with either fibrin sealant or sutures. Main outcome measures were visual analogue scale (VAS) assessments for “pain, ” “numbness, ” and “groin discomfort” on a scale of 0=best and 100=worst outcome. The primary endpoint was a composite that evaluated the prevalence of chronic disabling complications (VAS score >30 for pain/numbness/groin discomfort) at 12 months after surgery. Results: In total, 319 patients were randomized between January 2006 and April 2007 (159 fibrin sealant, 160 sutures). At 12 months, the prevalence of 1 or more disabling complication was significantly lower in the fibrin sealant group than in the sutures group (8.1% vs 14.8%; p=0.0344). Less pain was reported in the fibrin sealant group than in the sutures group at 1 and 6 months (p=0.0132; p=0.0052), as reflected by a lower proportion of patients using analgesics in the fibrin group over the study duration (65.2% vs 79.7%; p=0.0009). Only 3 of 316 patients (0.9%) experienced recurrence. The incidences of wound-healing complications and other adverse events were comparable between groups. Conclusions: Fibrin sealant for mesh fixation in Lichtenstein repair of small- medium sized inguinal hernias is well tolerated and reduces the rate of pain/numbness/groin discomfort by 45% relative to sutures without increasing hernia recurrence. This trial was conducted thanks to the cooperation of six surgeons in Europe: MH Pascual, A Hoeferlin, J Rosenberg, G Champault, A Kingsnorth, and M Miserez Pubblished on Annales of Surgeon 2012; 255: 650-657 IP-153 No fixation is required Felix E Marian Hospitals Fixation during laparoscopic hernia repair has been debated for more than 20 years. A few maverick surgeons in the early 90s had the gall to propose that the peritoneum would hold the mesh in place and that fixation was costly and unnecessary. Although initially thought to be ludicrous, the debate began and we continue that debate at the 16th Annual Hernia Repair Symposium. Laparoscopic hernia repair has come a long way since it’s infancy 24 years ago. The techniques have improved, been standardized and been shown in multiple randomized studies with qualified surgeons to be equal to or surpass the results of open hernia repairs. These studies did not address whether fixation was necessary or even potentially detrimental. A landmark cadaver study however, did demonstrate that the pelvic nerves are at risk for fixation injury even when fixation is properly placed. Multiple non-randomized reports appeared that presented data suggesting that recurrence rate were not dependent on fixation of the mesh, but rather the expertize of the operator. To completely settle the debate randomized controlled studies comparing fixation vs no fixation were performed. The results clearly demonstrated that in the typical hernia patient, fixation did not improve the already excellent incidence of recurrence. Lack of fixation did however, decrease pain scores. Whether there are special patients that require fixation of the mesh to reduce recurrence still needs to be investigated. What about newer non-penetrating forms of fixation? Are they superior? Can they further reduce recurrence without adding unnecessary cost? Let the debate continue! Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S42-S44 ABSTRACTS Saturday, March 15, 2014 Session 13: The future of hernia surgery © Springer-Verlag 2014 IP-12570 Prophylactic mesh placement after laparotomy: primary mesh augmentation to prevent ventral hernia IP-167 Quality of life metrics for hernia repair: functionality of abdominal wall reconstruction Jeekel J The Netherlands Roth J University of Kentucky Medical Center Prevention of incisional hernia should be the first and foremost focus of scientific endeavors in the next years, since Incisional hernia following laparotomy is one of the most frequent long-term complications since long, affecting 10 -20% of unselected patients and up to 50% of high-risk (e.g. obesity, AAA, stoma, Hartmann procedures) patients and lead to significant morbidity including pain, deformity, emergency re-admission and re- operation. Incisional hernia repair is highly prone to recurrence, leading to further morbidity and patient dissatisfaction, leading to high costs. The problem is that the worldwide incidence of incisional hernia has not changed despite the introduction of new techniques, like continuous sutures, slowly absorbable sutures, small stitches, suture length to wound length ratio (SL:WL) of 4:1 which did not change the incidence in daily practice. Continuous, slowly absorbable suture showed in systemic analyses and meta-analysis the optimum risk reduction of incisional hernia. Additional measures to further reduce this risk, even following optimum sutured closure, require investigation. Prophylactic mesh reinforcement of midline wounds has the potential to be an effective intervention in reducing the risk of incisional hernia formation and does show a benefit in reviews. However, the possibility of adverse effects of these techniques and increased costs remain. The adverse particularly regarding the risk of seroma, haematoma and surgical site infection following mesh implantation are still a concern. Other new techniques like small stitch techniques for closure of midline wounds show potential to be an effective technique for reducing the risk of incisional hernia formation. New data show a high potential for the small stitch technique for prevention. The recent data of new techniques for prevention of incisional hernia in patients with obesity, AAA, stoma and Hartmann procedures will be discussed. The repair of abdominal wall hernias is often judged based on the presence or absence of a hernia recurrence. Quality of life metrics are essential to understanding the implications of any procedure. Techniques for hernia repair include primary closure, bridging mesh, mesh reinforcement, and myofascial advancement flaps. Operative strategies are often employed with the primary goal of abdominal wall closure with a low rate of hernia recurrence. However, improvements in patient quality of life may be more relevant than hernia recurrence rates. The advantages and disadvantages of midline closure, bridging mesh, and advancement flaps should be considered preoperatively and measured to understand the functional implications of these techniques. Closure of the abdominal wall in the midline has benefits in rectus abdominis muscular function compared to bridging mesh. Abdominal wall atrophy and fibrosis associated with hernias may be reversed with midline apposition. However, the use of relaxing incisions and advancement flaps may impact function, stability, and quality of life. Abdominal wall physiology and functionality must be considered when performing abdominal wall reconstruction. Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S42-S44 S43 IP-12546 Biomimetic materials for ventral hernia repair: eliciting specific cellular responses IP-158 Routine use of synthetic mesh in clean-contaminated and contaminated ventral hernia repairs Franz M University of Michigan Carbonell A Greenville Health System Biomimetic materials are designed to imitate the structure and function of biological systems. A biomimetic mesh for ventral hernia repair should optimize repair cell influx while minimizing the foreign body response. The goal is improved wound healing, normalized inflammation and restoration of abdominal wall physiology. Biomimetic materials have used constructs of collagen, glycosaminoglycans, and extra-cellular matrix (ECM) based matrices composed of poly-caprolactone (PLC) and poly-carbonate/poly-urethane. Nanotechnologies (electrospinning) introduced constructing biomimetic surfaces with a defined nanopattern, eliciting tissue-specific cellular responses by stimulating integrin clustering. To improve upon the biological model, the biomimetic should be equally safe and effective at equal or less cost. One mechanism by which biomimetic material works is eliciting specific cellular responses. A biomimietic mesh should signal the influx of normal tissue repair cells (fibroblasts), mitigate a pathological inflammatory response (macrophages) and restore normal tendon function. The fundamental designs for cell influx are; 1) passive, three-dimensional scaffold, 2) bioactive molecular sequences attached to a passive, scaffold, and 3) active molecules secreted from the scaffold. A challenge is to develop such a material with the mechanical properties to withstand abdominal wall forces. Nanotechnology allows the production of biocompatible micro- and nano-structured scaffolds made of ultra- fine and continuous fibre networks with variable pore-size morphologically similar to the natural ECM. Several materials including synthetic- and natural-origin polymers and proteins have been successfully electrospun into nanofibre scaffolds. The structures interact with intercellular communications by sustaining cell adhesion, proliferation and differentiation. Complex biological systems are hard to “mimic”. It is the goal of biomimetic science to improve the challenges of tissue and organ based approaches, mitigating the limitations of the foreign-body, synthetic polymer approach. The bioactive properties of biomimetic materials may increase regulatory requirements for clinical applications. Clinical studies are needed to prove the potential of biomimetic materials in ventral hernia repair. Surgical dictum has long posited that permanent synthetic mesh is contraindicated in the repair of a hernia in a clean-contaminated or contaminated field. The origin of this belief arose from scattered reports of mesh erosions into the viscera, fistula complications, and chronic draining sinuses which occurred when heavy-weight polypropylene mesh was being used for the closure of the open abdomen, allowing the mesh to granulate through, prior to skin grafting. Despite these reports, several investigators have demonstrated the acceptably low morbidity associated with the use of heavy-weight polypropylene mesh in clean-contaminated and contaminated fields. Recently, the development of light-weight polypropylene mesh constructs has provided surgeons with a less dense mesh containing significantly decreased surface area and wide pores. The experience with using these more modern mesh constructs in contaminated fields has grown considerably. The time has come to critically reevaluate the unfounded fear of utilizing permanent synthetic mesh in contaminated fields. We will review the data speaking to the safety of mesh in these clean-contaminated and contaminated fields. S44 IP-118 Robotic Abdominal Wall Reconstruction Abdalla R University of Sao Paulo, Brazil Background: The weakness of the linea alba can be caused by congenital and acquired factors. The conventional procedure to correct these imperfections generally involve large incisions with big detachments of the skin and subcutaneous tissue. The use of video surgery for the repair of these weaknesses is still controversy. Robot positioning from lower abdomen can show midline almost complete from inside peritoneal view. Therefore, one can recognize linea alba and its defects. It is a mirror view of muscular aponeurotic abdominal wall, exact the same after opening the skin and subcutaneous tissue. With the exposure of midline the procedure can be done suturing it and bringing together rectus muscles with minimum dissection. Aim: To describe a new procedure using robotics in the repair of the linea alba, associating minimally invasive techniques by Rives/Stoppa and component separation techniques. Methods: Five patients undergone surgery in the same hospital, the same operating team and using the Da Vinci S. robotics equipment. Retro sheaths were opened and its borders were restored superior and inferior in its midline. This created a retro muscular envelope where a mesh is positioned and fixed. Results: Three women and two men undergone surgery, with no mortality. Two of these patients were re-operated due a recurrent hernia between muscle and posterior sheath that was closed in the re-access. Conclusions: The robotic procedure in the reconstruction of the linea alba showed itself feasible and aesthetically acceptable. Also, in advantage, the procedure follows the traditional principals reputable by experts of the abdominal wall trough minimally invasive surgery. Headings: Ventral hernia. Robotics. Abdominal wall. Umbilical hernia. Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S42-S44 IP-152 Public disclosure of outcomes and cost after hernia repair: surgeon-centered metrics Poulose B Vanderbilt University Medical Center Hernia repair represents entities with fairly small variation in care (inguinal hernia) to wide variations in approach and cost (ventral hernia). As we transition from a health care model of volume-based care to value-based care in the United States, an increasing focus must be placed on defining quality of care and costs associated with hernia management. A framework for public disclosure of outcomes and costs is presented in the context of continuous quality improvement for individual surgeons. Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S45-S46 ABSTRACTS Saturday, March 15, 2014 Session 14A: Biomaterial science session II © Springer-Verlag 2014 IP-12590 Inguinodynia – Causes and prevention Murphy J Troy, MI The incidence of inguinodynia or chronic groin pain has been reported as 11%. This means that 93,000 patients suffer this complication of inguinal hernia repair each year. Inguinodynia results in an increased cost of care, loss of work time and productivity, very unhappy patients and approximately 6,000 malpractice cases/year. Potential causes of inguinodynia include nerve damage, excessive use of mesh, and fixation. Nerve damage may be the result of direct trauma, stretching, vascular injury, as well as fixation. The use of excessive mesh with its inherent shrinkage and well as required fixation may also be a cause. Fixation may cause pain secondary to direct entrapment, by tension from shrinkage, or foreign body reaction. ProFlor is a dynamic implant that has been specifically designed to address each of these deficiencies and to eliminate them as possible causes of inguinodynia. Initial studies have shown that the incidence of chronic groin pain has been reduced by the use of ProFlor in inguinal hernia repairs. IP-155 Absorbable synthetic mesh for abdominal wall reconstruction: clinical value or an inexpensive alternative to biologic mesh Jacobson G University of California, San Diego Over the past several years there has been an ever increasing array of bioabsorbable products available for use in the reconstruction of the complex abdominal wall hernia. Recent data has suggested that they may provide a more cost effective modality when compared to traditional biologic grafts in the clean contaminated or contaminated environments. Consideration will be given to the data in this regards. However additional consideration is warranted as to the true value of these products relative to their more costly biologic counterparts. A review of the clinical performance characteristics of bioabsorbable materials will be made to assess if there is value outside of the inherent cost differences between the two. S46 Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S45-S46 IP-136 Antimicrobial Mesh as Prophylaxis for Mesh Infection: Preclinical and Clinical Support for Technology IP-12600 Mesh selection will be determined by genetic profiling: Hernia Repair 2030 Belyansky I Anne Arundel Medical Center Bachman S University of Missouri Prosthesis infection is a serious complication with the incidence as high as 18%. S. aureus is the most common pathogen responsible for over 90% of prosthetic infection and develops resistance to antimicrobial treatment by its ability to produce biofilm. Powerful intravenous broad-spectrum antibiotics have been used yielding marginal success rate in penetrating biofilm and killing the pathogen. It has been proposed that mesh hydrophobicity and the presence of niches in multifilament meshes contribute to increased biofilm growth. Composite anti-adhesive barrier meshes, and laminar antimicrobial impregnated meshes are not able to clear bacterial contamination as well as monofilament unprotected synthetic meshes. Presoaking the mesh in vacomycin solution has been shown to decrease bacterial growth in animal experiments. Recently, naturally occurring antimicrobial peptides have attracted much attention because of their high activity, broad antimicrobial spectrum, and low rate of antimicrobial resistance. We have investigated the efficacy of several antimicrobial proteins bound to mesh, and found lysostaphin to be superior in vitro. Lysostaphin effectively penetrates biofilm, making it an ideal agent for prevention and treatment of prosthetic-bound infections. In animal models, lysostaphin demonstrated significant in vitro and in vivo antibacterial efficacy when bound to mesh products. A large animal trial of lysostaphin-coated biologic mesh for abdominal wall reinforcement in the presence of a lethal inoculum of S. aureus demonstrated 100% animal survival, a significant reduction in the incidence of positive wound cultures, and complete defense of the mesh implant. Animal trial examining lysostaphin coated polyester mesh (concentrations of 100 μg/ml), demonstrated complete bacterial clearance at 7 days. Surface coatings using antibacterial enzymes could be a groundbreaking addition to the field of hernia repair. Future trials should focus on evaluation of monofilament antimicrobial-coated meshes in clinical arena. Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S47-S49 ABSTRACTS Saturday, March 15, 2014 Session 14B: Posters of distinction © Springer-Verlag 2014 FP-10933 Does normothermia reduce the risk of surgical site infection in ventral hernia patients? FP-130 Single-center experience with parastomal hernia repair using sublay mesh placement Baucom R, Phillips S, Holzman M, Ehrenfeld J, Martin B, Nealon W, Sharp K, Kaiser J, Poulose B Vanderbilt University Medical Center Raigani S, Criss C, Petro C, Novitsky Y, Rosen M University Hospitals Case Medical Center Background: The World Health Organization (WHO) defined perioperative core body temperature above 36 degrees C as a quality metric (QM) to minimize the risk of surgical site infection (SSI). Ventral hernia repair (VHR) patients often have higher than expected rates of SSIs, with no evidence evaluating the benefit of normothermia in this population. This study aims to evaluate the effect of normothermia on postoperative SSI in VHR patients. Methods: Patients who underwent VHR between 2005-2012 at Vanderbilt University Hospital were eligible for enrollment. Temperature data for VHRs with Class I incisions were obtained from the Perioperative Data Warehouse (PDW) and merged with outcome data for SSIs using National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data. Patients were divided into normothermic or hypothermic groups based upon the QM. The primary outcome was 30-day SSI. Results: 552 VHR patients were identified: 46% women with mean age 53 years (±13 SD). 79% were open procedures, and all but 1 SSI occurred in open VHRs. 96% received on-time perioperative antibiotics. The mean intraoperative temperature was 36.1 (±0.8) degrees C, and 88% met the QM. With an overall SSI rate of 7%, the rate of SSI was 7% in the normothermic group and 4% in the hypothermic group (p=0.61). Smoking (OR 3.4, 95% CI 1.5-7.5, p<0.05), body mass index (OR 1.5, 95% CI 0.99-2.2, p=0.06), and length of operation (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.6-2.6, p<0.05) were included in multivariable analysis. After controlling for these risk factors, there was no association between hypothermia and SSI (OR 1.4, 95% CI 0.4-5.0, p=0.62). Conclusions: This study demonstrates that maintenance of normothermia is not associated with decreased 30-day SSI in VHR patients. Efforts to reduce SSI should focus on surgical technique, total time spent in the operating room, and patient factors. Background: Parastomal hernias (PsH) are frequent complications of enterostomies. While several approaches have been described, the preferred technique is yet to be defined. We aimed to evaluate our outcomes of open PsH repair with retromuscular (sublay) mesh reinforcement. Methods: From 2006 to 2013, 48 consecutive patients undergoing open retromuscular PsH repair were identified in the prospectively maintained database and analyzed. Surgical technique included stoma relocation, retromuscular dissection with transversus abdominis release, and sublay mesh placement. All stomas were prophylactically reinforced with cruciate incisions through sublay mesh. Main outcome measures included demographics, perioperative details, wound complications (classified according to the CDC guidelines) and recurrences. Results: There were 22 male and 25 female patients with a mean age of 62.5 and BMI of 31.7kg/m2. 24 patients had recurrent PsH with an average of 3.8 prior repairs. Ostomies included 19 colostomies, 20 ileostomies, and 10 ileal conduits. Thirty-three patients had a concurrent repair of a ventral/incisional hernia. All patients underwent mesh repair with either biologic (n=33), lightweight polypropylene (n=12) or absorbable synthetic mesh (n=2). There were 13 (28%) occurrences of superficial surgical site infections (SSI); 7 required beside drainage and 6 resolved with antibiotics. There were 8 (17%) deep SSIs; 5 were treated with percutaneous drainage, 2 resolved with antibiotics and 1 required debridement in the operating room. One patient had mucocutaneous separation, which was treated conservatively. No mesh grafts required removal. At a mean follow-up time of 11.1 months, 5 patients (10.6%) developed a recurrence; 3 patients required re-repair. Conclusion: PsH represent a formidable surgical challenge. In this largest series of complex open repairs with sublay mesh reinforcement and stoma relocation, we demonstrate that this results in an effective repair. This technique may be the procedure of choice for complex parastomal hernia repair. S48 FP-172 Comparing perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic vs open inguinal hernia repair using two national large data bases Tadaki C, Lomelin D, Simorov A, Jones R, Oleynikov D, Goede M University of Nebraska Medical Center Introduction: Studies comparing laparoscopic vs open inguinal hernia repair (IHR) techniques have shown similar recurrence rates, but have disagreed on perioperative outcomes and costs. The aim of this study is to compare laparoscopic vs open outcomes and costs. Method: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) was used to compare length of hospital stay (LOS), operative and anesthesia time. The University Health System Consortium (UHC), an alliance of more than 300 institutions, was used to review the overall cost. International Classification of Disease 9TH revision codes (ICD-9) and Current Procedure Terminology (CPT) for laparoscopic and open IHR was used. Results: A total of 75,132 patients’ records and perioperative outcomes who underwent an IHR were evaluated through NSQIP. Cost data was evaluated from a matched group of patients in UHC. Laparoscopy was performed in 18, 309 patients and open surgery was performed in 56,823 patients. Though LI patients had a longer operative time (66.3±36.1 vs 60.6±31.4; p<0.05) and anesthesia time (88.6±73.1 vs 81.8±64.1; p<0.05); they had a shorter LOS (0.2±1.7 vs 0.3±4.1; p<0.05), and decreased morbidities: wound breakdown (Odds ratio of 0.321; 95% CI 0.098-1.054) and surgical site infections (OR of 0.727; 95% CI 0.532-0.993). Overall costs favored open over LI repair (5,226±1,933 vs 3,061±1,289). Analyzing the cost data showed the discrepancy mainly stemmed from LI supplies ($1,448 vs $340; p<0.05) and OR services ($1,380 vs $1,080; p<0.05). Conclusion: This study demonstrates the LOS and perioperative outcomes were superior in the LI group; however, the overall cost was higher due to the supplies. Advancement in technology as well as a surgeon’s preference of supplies and skill level are all factors in decreasing the overall cost of the operation. Though the “price tag” of a LI inguinal hernia repair appears to be greater, the benefits from the operation may outweigh the cost. FP-144 Apples to apples: a validated staging system (I-IV) for incisional hernias Petro C, Raigani S, Criss C, Bakaki P, Orenstein S, Soltanian H, Novitsky Y, Rosen M University Hospitals Case Medical Center Introduction: The absence of a standardized classification scheme for incisional hernias hinders comparisons within the literature, indirectly delaying meaningful discussions regarding technique. We aimed to create a simple, validated staging system using variables associated with prognosis. Methods: Our prospective database of abdominal wall repairs at Case Medical Center between 2005 and 2012 was reviewed retrospectively with no filter for technique. Patient demographics, modified Ventral Hernia Working Group (mVHWG) grade, and hernia width/location using preoperative CT-scan were reviewed. Predictors of surgical site occurrence SSO and recurrence would be used to generate a staging system that groups patients with similar outcome profiles. Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S47-S49 Results: Three hundred thirty-three patients with a minimum of 90day follow-up including 181 patients with at least 1-year follow-up were reviewed. We found that hernia width (<10 cm, 10-20 cm, >20 cm) was associated with both SSO (p<0.0001) and recurrence (p=0.0002). Using width and mVHWG grade (G), we grouped permutations with similar morbidity profiles. Stage I patients are healthy with small defects (G1 <10 cm) and can expect infrequent SSO/recurrence rates [6.7%, 6.7%]. Stage II patients are either healthy with moderate-sized defects, or have small hernias with comorbidities or contamination (G1 10-20 cm OR G2-3 <10 cm) and can expect mild SSO/recurrence rates [12.4%, 11.3%]. Stage III patients are healthy with large hernias, or have moderate sized hernias with comorbidities or contamination (G1 >20 cm OR G2-3 10-20 cm) and have a moderate risk for SSO/recurrence [27.1%, 15.1%]. Finally, Stage IV patient have large hernias with comorbidities or contamination (G23 >20 cm) and are considered highest risk for SSO/recurrence [42.3%, 34.6%]. Staging trends were significant for both SSO (p=0.0002) and recurrence (p=0.00015). Conclusions: Herein we present a validated staging system that ordinally ranks hernias by risk of SSO and recurrence. As there was no control for technique, this can now serve as the platform for “apples to apples” comparisons regarding operative approach. FP-115 A summative assessment of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair for general surgery residents: perception does not equal reality Greenberg J, Cohen E, Maag A, Wiegmann D, Greenberg C, Pugh C University of Wisconsin Background: Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia (LVH) repair is a common procedure performed worldwide. Graduating residents should be competent to perform this procedure independently. We utilized a LVH simulation to assess differences in resident self-assessment and faculty evaluation. Methods: Six graduating Chief Residents, within two weeks of graduation, were given 30 minutes to complete a LVH repair using a simulator with known evidence of validity. Prior laparoscopic case experience was reviewed using the ACGME Resident Case Log System. Residents completed both pre- and post- self-assessments utilizing a 5 point-Likert scale to assess their pre- and post-procedure confidence. Faculty assessed resident competency and performance utilizing a 12-item, task-specific checklist and Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) to assess general technical skills (1=very poor, 5=clearly superior). All simulations were recorded using both external and laparoscopic views. Results: Residents completed an average of 140 basic laparoscopic cases (Range: 108-175); 150 complex laparoscopic cases (Range: 122-170); and 15 laparoscopic ventral hernia repairs (Range: 13-20) during the course of their residency. Five out of six residents were confident or very confident in their ability to complete a LVH repair while one was moderately confident. After completion of the simulator, resident confidence in overall ability to perform LVH repair was unchanged (4 vs 4, p=1.0). Despite their confidence, 5 out of 6 residents failed to complete the simulation. Video review revealed a wide range of critical errors. Faculty checklist scores ranged from 33%-100% of tasks performed correctly. OSATS scores ranged from 2 (poor) to 5 (clearly superior) for general technical skills. Conclusions: Resident perceptions regarding procedural competence vary drastically from observer ratings. Earlier assessment followed by focused teaching may allow for better awareness and a faster progression to competency in LVH repair. Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S47-S49 FP-132 Efficacy of antibiotic pulse lavage irrigation for contaminated retro-rectus abdominal wall reconstructions Wu Y, Peacock J, Criss C, Soltanian H, Rosen M, Novitsky Y University Hospitals Case Medical Center Introduction: Contaminated surgical wounds are frequently encountered during abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR). Pulse lavage irrigation (PLI) facilitates the removal of surface contaminants and bacteria. We hypothesized that PLI would help reduce bacterial burden during complex retro-rectus abdominal wall reconstruction in clean contaminated and contaminated wounds. Methods: A retrospective review of prospectively collected data from our institution was performed for patients undergoing AWR in the setting of clean contaminated or contaminated wounds. Wound cultures were obtained from the retro-rectus space prior to and after 3L of antibiotic PLI (cephazolin/gentamycin/bacitracin). Routine microbiologic analysis was then performed; any detected bacterial growth was defined as “positive” culture. Results: From January 2012 to May 2013, 46 consecutive patients undergoing major AWR were evaluated. The median age was 54 years (31-88) with a mean BMI of 39±27. Seventy-six percent of patients had recurrent hernias. Twenty-six patients (56%) had a history of wound infection. Pre-operatively, the wounds were classified as clean-contaminated in 22 (48%) patients and contaminated in 23 (52%) patients. Biologic mesh was used in 46%, synthetic mesh in 48%, bioabsorable mesh in 4%, and primary repair in 2% of cases. Intra-operatively, 27 (59%) of patients had a negative Pre-PLI (56% clean-contaminated, 44% contaminated). Of the 19 positive pre-PLI cases, the majority were contaminated (12) versus clean-contaminated (7). Seventeen positive pre-PLIs cultures became negative for a conversion rate of 89%. Overall, the rate of culture negative retrorectus space following PLI during clean-contaminated/contaminated repairs was 95.7%. Conclusion: We demonstrated that the majority of contaminated AWR cases had no detectable bacteria in the extraperitoneal space. Furthermore, the use of antibiotic pulse lavage of the retro-rectus pocket resulted in near complete elimination of detectable bacteria. It appears that intra-operative antibiotic pulse lavage is associated with a significant bacteriologic advantage during contaminated retrorectus repairs. FP-12503 Do patients follow-up with their original surgeon when ventral hernia repairs (VHR) fail? Oommen B, Kim M, Ross S, Augenstein V, Heniford B Carolinas Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Division of Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgery Introduction: VHR are one of the most common procedures in General Surgery. Without formal follow-up, surgeons may underestimate recurrence rates. Our aim was to determine the rate at which patients do not return to their original surgeon and why. An examination of the factors influencing patients to seek new surgeons for repair of recurrent hernias was undertaken. Methods: Recurrent ventral hernia patients who presented from December 2012 to September 2013 were surveyed. Responses regarding their original VHR, recurrence and factors influencing their change in surgeon were collected. S49 Results: Eight-seven patients completed surveys. The majority (84.5%) identified their own recurrence; 71.2% had imaging /labs since surgery. Over one-third (35.8%) had three or more hernia repairs; 43.5% had two or more surgeons. Only 44.2% of patients’ surgeons were aware their patient was seeing another surgeon for VHR recurrence. The most common reasons for not returning to the last surgeon were that the surgeon “failed to repair my hernia” (51.6%), distant location (29.0%): 54.9% lived 25-100 miles from their previous surgeon; 22% lived >100 miles. There was a 75.9% satisfaction rate with pre-operative experience and less post-operatively (67%). 76.8% were satisfied with surgeon demeanor, 69.9% with timeliness, 70.4% at discharge, 69.1% at follow-up. Sixty percent reported complications related to previous repair; 12% were readmitted within thirty days of surgery. Two-thirds of these patients rated their previous surgeon’s skill level at 4 or 5 on a 5-point scale. Conclusions: The majority of patients with recurrent ventral hernias do not return to their last surgeon. This number is influenced by failure of the operation and distance from the surgeon. Most patients had complications but were satisfied with their surgeon demeanor and skill level. Surgeon without particular follow-up regimen should be careful in quoting their recurrence rates. FP-121 The impact of developing a comprehensive hernia center on referral patterns and cost of hernia care Raigani S, De Silva G, Novitsky Y, Rosen M University Hospitals Case Medical Center Background: Complex hernia repairs represent a formidable surgical challenge. Several comprehensive hernia centers, including ours, with advanced expertise have recently emerged across the country. However, the effects of tertiary specialization remain largely unclear. We aimed to evaluate the impact of developing a comprehensive hernia center on the referral patterns and costs of patients with complex hernias. Methods: A prospectively maintained database was used to identify all patients undergoing open ventral hernia repair (VHR) between 2006-2013 at the Case Comprehensive Hernia Center. Patients were separated into two groups by zip code: those traveling either <25 miles or >100 miles. Demographics, operative characteristics, length of stay (LOS), and costs data were analyzed. Results: Of all patients who underwent open VHR during the study period, 287 met the inclusion criteria. Hernia length, width and area were all significantly larger for patients traveling >100 miles (p<0.01 for all). These patients were also more likely to have active mesh infections (OR 3.57) and non-healing wounds (OR 5.00) when compared to local patients. Length of hospital stay was significantly longer for patients traveling >100 miles compared to those traveling <25 miles (9.7 vs 6.8; p<0.0001). Surgical site occurrence, infection and hernia recurrence rates were similar between the two groups during the follow-up period. Patients who traveled >100 miles incurred significantly higher fixed direct and variable direct costs compared to those traveled <25 miles (p<0.05 for both). Conclusion: The development of a comprehensive hernia center results in centralization of complex hernia care. Patients traveling >100 miles for ventral hernia repair have significantly larger and more complex hernias. The implications for improved patient outcomes and potential reimbursement issues for providing this care should be carefully evaluated. Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S50-S97 ABSTRACTS Posters © Springer-Verlag 2014 P-100 Abdominal wall reconstruction, what have we learned? Clarke J Palms of Pasadena Hospital This presentation will review lessons learned during the evolution of surgical techniques for repair of abdominal wall defects, with focus on those related to previous abdominal surgery: ventral incisional hernia. Progress and improvement in results for this challenging surgical problem continue to develop, based in part on a better understanding of certain anatomical and physiological characteristics of the abdominal wall. Examples of what we have learned from shortcomings of various operations will be discussed as well as contributions and experience from some of the many surgeons who have described new techniques or have modified existing ones. Despite individual variation in methods, there now seems to be a trend toward general agreement on the basic surgical principles for incisional hernia repair. Prevention, however, remains elusive. As surgeons, the only variable under our control is technique. Some newer thoughts in the area of prevention, especially focused on techniques of abdominal wall closure, will be introduced. P-101 Laparoscopic midline incisional hernia repair: new technique based on trans peritoneal retro-muscular mesh placement Copsta T, Abdalla R, Santo M, Ceconnello I Clinics Hospital of the University of Sao Paulo Background: The minimally invasive approach changed the way to dissect and prepare the anatomy of the abdominal wall. Former evidences showed defect closure benefits with mesh reinforcement. Therefore, we designed a study to demonstrate a new technique for laparoscopic correction of incisional hernias with defect closure and retro-muscular mesh placement. Methods: Between October 2012 and August 2013, a total of 13 patients were submitted to laparoscopic correction of incisional hernias. Access to the cavity was obtained through a suprapubic incision, two ports were placed in the lower inferior quadrants for dissection. The defect was closed with endo-stapler. A pouch was created, in which a retro-muscular mesh was placed. Fixation was completed using a trans-aponeurotic hernia stapler. Selection was based on supra umbilical midline hernias post open bariatric surgery. Pregnant women, patients in the presence of cancer or clinical contraindications were excluded. Results: The patients mean age was 52.3 (range 39-65). 85% (n: 11) were women. Two patients had Fibromyalgia, four had Diabetes and Hypertension. The mean BMI was 28.36 kg/m2 (range 23.1-31.6). Surgery was performed successfully through the three ports; mean number of incisional hernias was 3 (range 1-5), with a mean maximum length of 3.97 cm (range 2.1-5.4). The mean surgical time was 115.8 min (range 90-170), and the median hospital stay was 1 day. No intraoperative or immediate postoperative complications occurred. One patient had a seroma treated conservatively one week after surgery. CT-Findings, made before and after the procedure, showed total closure of the defect. QOL showed satisfaction, acceptance and no complains. Conclusion: Although it is a small number of patients we showed it is a feasible technique, easy to do, with the laparoscopic benefits, with acceptable results showed by CT-scan, peri-operative and QOL findings. Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S50-S97 P-102 Extreme single-stage reconstruction of the abdominal wall: A prospective series of patients presenting with enteric fistulas, mesh infection and ventral hernias Birolini C, Utiyama E, Rasslan S University of São Paulo, School of Medicine The reconstruction of the abdominal wall in patients presenting with enteric fistulas is a formidable challenge. The recommended approaches are component separation techniques or staged operations using absorbable or biological meshes despite high recurrence and mesh infection rates, and the risk of two operations in this complicated group of patients. Moreover, the coexistence of an infected mesh is usually considered an absolute contra-indication to perform a primary reinforcement using a new synthetic mesh. From 2008 until 2013, twelve patients presenting with severe destruction of the abdominal wall were submitted to a single stage repair with simultaneous treatment of enteric fistulas. In eight patients, fistulas were associated to mesh erosion into the bowel. In all patients, we used an onlay polypropylene mesh to reinforce the reconstruction of the midline. There were 8 males and 4 females, and the mean age was 53 years. Mean BMI was 27 and five patients were ASA 2. The number of previous abdominal operations ranged between 1 and 20, and the onset of symptoms, between 1 month and 26 years. Pre-operative cultures were positive in 8 patients. Surgical complications included two minor wound infections, two seromas and one patient with localized skin necrosis. One patient presented a suspicious discharge of enteric fluid through the drain that healed on medical therapy. All patients were discharged with no signs of wound infection. Nine patients have a follow-up of more than one year and no re-infection or hernia recurrence, were observed in this series. These results reinforce the fact that the use of synthetic mesh is safe in contaminated and infected surgical fields. P-106 Abdominoscrotal hydrocele presenting as abdominal pain and mass after trans scrotal hydrocelectomy Megison S, Soeken T, Hodgman E Children’s Medical Center Dallas/ UT Southwestern Medical School Purpose: Describe previously unreported presentation of Abdominoscrotal hydrocele Methods: Abdominoscrotal hydrocele (ASH) is an uncommon form of hydrocele that extends from the scrotum through the inguinal ring into the abdomen. Modern imaging capabilities with ultrasonography or computed tomography (CT) may identify a cystic abdominal mass, which when combined with physical exam findings, may suggest the diagnosis of ASH and permit appropriate operative planning. However, the diagnosis is often made only upon surgical exploration, prompting an alteration of the surgeon’s initial plan for repair. Results: We present the case of a 7-year-old child who underwent hydrocele repair 5 years ago via a trans-scrotal approach. He presented to the ED with complaints of right lower quadrant (RLQ) pain. Ultrasound revealed a cystic mass in the RLQ; a CT was obtained which confirmed the diagnosis of ASH. Repair was initially approached via laparoscopy; however, inflammation around the internal inguinal ring made identification of the vas deferens and spermatic vessels difficult, and the procedure was converted to a minilaparotomy, with successful excision of the hydrocele and drainage of the inguinal portion. S51 Conclusions: ASH is a rare form of hydrocele, and is best diagnosed through a combination of thorough physical examination and judicious use of imaging. It is unclear whether this case represents a recurrence of the hydrocele with conversion to an ASH, or whether this patient’s ASH went undiagnosed at the time of his prior procedure. Pre-operative identification of ASH will allow selection of the most appropriate approach, whether through a conventional inguinal incision, or via a trans-scrotal, laparoscopic, or open abdominal technique. The surgeon must remain alert to the potential for an abdominal component to any hydrocele, as the diagnosis of ASH may be made only intra-operatively, and require an adjustment in the operative plan. P-107 New indication of surgical glue in preperitoneal approach: Nyhus modified technique Carreño-Saenz O, García Pastor P, Aguilar Martí M, Barber Millet S, Montilla Navarro E, Iserte Hernández J, Bonafé Diana S, Carbonell Tatay F, Salvador P Valencia, Spain Introduction: Cyanoacrylate glues are tissue adhesive with high adherent and hemostatic properties. In recent years, the use of synthetic glues has become an established practice in several areas of surgical treatment. For example, they are used in open and laparoscopic surgery and in digestive tract endoscopy and interventional radiology. In this case, we use the glue for mesh fixation in modified Nyhus technique for hernia repair. Methods: By modified Nyhus technique, once identified the preperitoneal space, place a polypropylene mesh coated with bioabsorbable oil 4.1 “x 6.3” (C-qur CentrifiFX Atrium) fastening the cooper ligament and pubis with cyanoacrylate glue. Results: The use of glue in this technique decreased operative time, postoperative pain and early recovery to perform activities of daily living. Although, there are still serious studies that reveal the effectiveness of the glue over other fastening means, is setting a good option. Conclusions: The preperitoneal approach (Nyhus modified) for hernia repair is easier to perform and faster. The use of a synthetic tissue adhesive (n-hexyl-α-cyanoacrylate) is safe as fastening in patients without comorbidity hernioplasties with good postoperative results. S52 P-108 Supra pubic ventral hernias treatment: modified Stoppa technique Carreño-Saenz O, Barber Millet S, Aguilar Martí M, García Pastor P, Vergara Suarez F, Montilla Navarro E, Iserte Hernández J, Bonafé Diana S, Carbonell Tatay F, Salvador P Valencia, Spain Introduction: The suprapubic hernia, has its own characteristics that define and differentiate. It belongs to the hernias that have a ring party formed by a bony ridge, is located immediately above the pubic bone in the midline and lower abdominal wall and according to the classification of the European Hernia Society is nominated with acronyms M5. Our team has developed a technique that is based on the methods described by Stoppa, Rives, Zavaleta, Wantz and Bendavid, among others, but was the first, René Stoppa who provided the fundamental idea of the “complete reinforcement of the visceral sac” placing a prosthesis hosted pre peritoneal space and adapted to the anatomy of the area, technique designed to solve recurrent or bilateral inguinal hernias. Our modification is adapted to correct defects supra pubic and effectively strengthen the entire lower abdominal wall. Methods: We have created a new technique based on the placement of an open prosthesis extended “butterfly wings” and preperitoneal retropubic space, and above exceeds the umbilical region. The series consisted of 50 consecutive patients operated on between 2003 and 2011, following a surgical protocol similiar for all the patients. Results: There were no significant complications the most frequent was a seroma (6%) followed by wound infection (2%) and Haematoma (1%). During the follow (between 4 and 80 months), there has been one recurrence of the incisional hernia. Conclusions: The modified Stoppa technique achieved good results in our hands, from the surgical point of view (reproducibility, recurrence), and for the patient, with minimal discomfort and recovery of quality of life. P-110 Recurrent Inguinal Hernias. How to face them? Goderich Lalán J, Alfonso J, Fernández E, Fajardo M Hospital Universitario de Santiago de Cuba Operated hernias always have recurrence possibilities. Inguinal hernia relapse oscillates between 11-20% using tension techniques and 0.5-5% with open or laparoscopic techniques without tension. Recurrence with open or laparoscopic techniques without tension is smaller than 1% in primary hernias and up to 5% in relapsing hernias, independently from the access path, as reported in 37 publications in the last 5 years. Classification is important. We use that of Nyhus: Iva direct hernia, IVb indirect hernia, IVc femoral hernia and IVd combination of anyone of the above mentioned. Objective: To evaluate the result of the surgical treatment: Shortterm: before the 2 years; Mid-term: up to 14 years. Method: Clinical observational study from January 1, 1996 to December 31, 2010, at the University Hospitals Dr. Juan Bruno Zayas Alfonso, in Santiago de Cuba and Dr. Manuel Fajardo, in Havana. Each patient requires individual evaluation of nutritional state, antecedents of respiratory, urinary obstruction, cardiovascular diseases, other abdominal operations, other hernias, time from last operation, technique used, bilateralism, age. Treatment Principles: individual assessment, antibiotic prevention, short hospital stay sur- Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S50-S97 gery, systematic specialized consultation follow up. One hundred and eighty nine patients were operated; from them, 23 Iva direct hernias, 31 Ivc femoral hernias, 45 IVb indirect hernias and 102 IVd combined. Results: No relapse in 23 recurrent direct hernias with Lichtenstein’s technique; one relapse (0.5%) in 45 direct hernias with Lichtenstein’s and Rives’s. In femoral hernias, if absolute certainty of its femoral nature, application of laparoscopic or pre peritoneal prosthetic techniques through inguinal approach is valued; thirty-one of them did not relapse and two relapsed (2%) from 102 hernias combined with the Jean Rives’s technique. From a total of 189 hernioplasties in reproduced hernias, 3 relapsed (3.5%). Complications: 2 seromas (1.1%), operation site infections: 4 (2.2%); haematoma: only 1 (0.6%). Conclusions: Lichtenstein’s and Jean Rives’s techniques offer excellent results in mesh repairs of hernias recurrence, with correct individualized pre-operatory evaluation by trained personnel. P-112 Adhesive mesh utility in the treatment of hernia groin, comparison with polypropylene mesh Montilla-Navarro E, Carreño-Sáenz O, García Pastor P, Aguilar Martí M, Bonafé Diana S, Iserte Hernandez J, Carbonell Tatay F Valencia, Spain Background: Certainly since these biomaterials way meshes were first used to treat inguinal hernias has been increased not only the type of material used (Polyester, poliproplineo, expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (e- PTFE), but the shape and configuration of the same. currently the appearance of absorbable materials, biological glue to attach the mesh and use self-adhesive mesh has diverted attention from the research, since they are aspects that have yet to show their true value. Materials and methods: We performed a retrospective study by reviewing medical records of patients from our unit between 2009 and 2012. We included 120 patients treated for inguinal hernia. Sixty patients (60) were in the group of self-adhesive mesh (Parietene Progrip®) and 60 patients were in the group of conventional mesh PPL. Were measured intraoperative and postoperative results in both groups. We excluded patients with bilateral hernias, recurrent and emergency surgeries. Results: A total of 120 patients were included in the series, were divided into 2 groups (Mesh Adhesive / conventional mesh) of 60 each. The demographic characteristics of both groups were similar in age, sex, type and size of inguinal hernia. From the analyzed data, which identifies the only difference is the operating time in both groups, being lower in the sticky mesh. No differences in postoperative outcomes such as pain, hospital stay, complications and hernia recurrence. Conclusion: In our series, the use of self-adhesive mesh in inguinal hernia treatment reduced surgical time, no differences were found in terms of postoperative pain, hospital stay, complications and hernia recurrence. Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S50-S97 P-117 Reconstruction of giant incisional hernia with Chevrel’s technique Mladenovik D, Shenol T, Nikolo vs ki A, Devaja A University Surgical Clinic St. Naum Ohridski Reconstruction of giant incisional hernias (diameter > 10 cm) represents a serious surgical problem, accompanied with high rate of recurrence, postoperative complications and mortality. The application of Chevrel technique which is based on dynamic reconstruction of the anterior abdominal wall supported with onlay application of mesh, sublimates anatomical and functional assumptions for successful reconstruction of the anterior abdominal wall defects. Method and material: In the 16 year period (1996-2012), 125 patients have undergone elective surgery because of giant incisional hernia M4-W4R according to Chevrel classification. The female/male ratio was 88/37 with average BMI 31.2. Only 21 patients had normal weight. The patients were operated in general endotracheal anesthesia using Chevrel technique.We used polypropylene to onlay position, double suction drainage, low weight heparin prophylaxis and epidural analgesia in all cases. Results: The used technique did not cause any intraoperative complications and there was one death (perforated ulcer). Operative time was 60-80 minutes. Postoperative hospitalization was 8.8 days (721). The following complications were noted: skin necrosis - 1 patient, hematoma - 8 patients, seroma 22 patients. We had recurrence in three patients because mesh was shrinking on the anterior aponeurosis m. recti abdominis defect. Conclusion: The original Chevrel technique sublimates from the tissue reconstruction on the linea alba and approximatio of the rectus muscles strengthened with onlay application of the mesh, represents acceptable method. The low rate of recurrence and complications, as well as good cosmetic results, kindly recommend Chevrel technique as dynamic support of anterior abdominal wall. P-122 30-day postoperative mortality risk score for emergent anterior abdominal wall hernia repair using the american college of surgeons national surgical quality improvement database Chung P, Tam S, Schwartzman A, Bernstein M, Sugiyama G SUNY Downstate Medical Center Background: No risk score for short term mortality after emergent anterior abdominal wall hernia repair yet exists in the literature. Study design: NSQIP Participant Use Files (2005-2010) were the primary data source. Patients that had incarcerated, irreducible, obstructed, or gangrenous ventral, umbilical, or epigastric hernias (identified by ICD9 codes), undergoing either open or laparoscopic repair with or without mesh (identified by CPT codes), undergoing emergent surgery were selected. 76 variables were used as potential predictors. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to create a model predicting short-term mortality. The Receiver Operating Characteristic Area Under Curve (AUC) and the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test were used to evaluate the model. Bootstrap-validated AUC was calculated. Results: 5120 cases met the selection criteria. 145 patients (2.83%) died within 30 days. Ten independent variables correlated to short- S53 term mortality: age (OR 3.47, 95% CI [2.47, 4.87], p<0.0001), anesthesia time (OR 1.28, 95% CI [1.09, 1.50], p=0.0022), preoperative creatinine levels (OR 1.15, 95% CI [1.10, 1.19], p<0.0001), preoperative elevated WBC (OR 1.23, 95% CI [1.03, 1.46], p=0.0189), preoperative platelet levels (OR 0.61, 95% CI [0.48, 0.78], p<0.0001), ascites (OR 5.08, 95% CI [3.14, 8.24], p<0.0001), CHF (OR 2.71, 95% CI [1.30, 5.65], p=0.008), PVD (OR 4.55, 95% CI [2.27, 9.12], p<0.0001), disseminated cancer (OR 4.57, 95% CI [1.55, 13.45], p=0.0058), preoperative sepsis (OR 18.09, 95% CI [9.89, 33.12], p<0.0001), and preoperative septic shock (OR 2.49, 95% CI [1.60, 3.87], p<0.0001). The AUC was 0.896, the bootstrapvalidated AUC was 0.878, suggesting excellent discriminative ability. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test had a p-value of 0.453, suggesting that the model does not overfit. Conclusion: The risk model developed has good-to-excellent ability to predict 30-day mortality after emergent hernia repair for incarcerated, irreducible, obstructed, or gangrenous hernias. A nomogram was also created. P-123 Inguinal neuritis in recurrent inguinal hernia Wright R Cascade Hernia Institute Purpose: Investigate the pattern of occurrence of inguinal neuritis in recurrent inguinal hernia. We hypothesize neuritis will occur in more nerves and with a wider distribution than in primary repair. Methods: Retrospective chart review of thirty consecutive recurrent inguinal hernia repairs concentrating on the occurrence of inguinal neuritis. These are not chronic pain patients. Nerves suspected of containing inguinal neuritis were sent for histologic examination. Operative parameters and nerve pathology reports were reviewed. This data was compared with a recent series of one hundred consecutive primary inguinal hernia repairs. An independent statistician from Whitman University reviewed the data. Results: 20 patients were found to have inguinal neuritis among thirty recurrent open inguinal hernia repairs (66%). This compares to 34% among primary repairs, but is a similar rate (p>.886) assuming the damaged nerve was left intact in 34% of these recurrences during the primary repair. Two separate nerves were found to exhibit neuritis in six patients, (20%), significantly higher than 1% among primary hernias, (p<0.01) In recurrent inguinal hernia, 89% of neuritis occurred in the Ilioinguinal nerve compared to 88% of damaged Ilioinguinal nerves in the primary hernia. A test for the difference in proportions gives Z=0.1522 with P (|Z|>.1522)=0.879. The most common site of neuritis occurrence in recurrent hernias with nerve damage to the Ilioinguinal nerve was at the external oblique Neuroperforatum among 70% of the patients, compared to 83% in primary cases. A test for difference in proportions gives Z=1.4175 with P (|Z|>1.4175)=0.156. Conclusion: The overall incidence of inguinal neuritis was 66% in recurrent inguinal hernia repairs. The Ilioinguinal nerve was most commonly affected in these recurrent hernias. Inguinal neuritis occurs more commonly in recurrent hernia repair compared with primary inguinal hernia; however, it has a similar distribution. Neuritis occurs in two nerves with a 20% frequency (p<0.01), so all nerves should be assessed during recurrent herniorrhaphy. S54 P-124 Original technique description: treatment of mid-line abdominal wall hernias with the use of endo-stapler for mid-line closure Garcia R, Abdalla R, Costa R, Abdalla B Hospital Sirio Libanes Introduction: Minimally invasive video surgery has modified anatomy dissection of diseases that are treated operatively. However, the benefit of this method has been delayed due to the lack of development of technologies and articulated movements for the abdominal wall; demanding the need for investments and time for solidification. Our operative approach to repair the abdominal wall is based on the Rives-Stoppa principles. Objectives: Case report of an original technique, approximating the retro sheaths of the rectus abdominal muscles together with its suturing, using linear endo staplers for incisional supra umbilical medial ventral hernia treatment. Methods: As the recognition of the stability and safety of the suture was identified we proposed the laparoscopic technique for the midline ventral hernia treatment for a patient after consenting agreement was signed. Discussion: The procedure was able to achieve better results of the rectus muscle function with approximation comparing to the laparoscopic bridging maneuver. The use of liner stapling is more appealing than endoscopic suture, due to a safer approach for the patient and better management of time for the surgeon. Conclusion: The method is feasible, easier to perform, reproducible and saves time. P-125 Quality of life study of patients submitted to anterior abdominal wall laparoscopic hernioplasty Garcia R, Abdalla R, Said D, Costa R Hospital Sírio Libanes Background: The laparoscopic ventral hernia repair techinique, introduced by Leblanc and Booth, in the 90`s, made possible surgeries with smaller skin incisions and smaller dissection of the soft tissue around the hernia, therefore a better wound, a quicker postoperative with a recent return to activities, and a lower complications rate. Aim: We intend, with this study, to evaluate the applicability of a quality of life questionnary based on the molds of the American Hernia Society, European Hernia Society e Carolinas Equation for Quality of Life, in patients that have been throw an anterior abdominal wall laparoscopic hernioplasty (incisional/ epigastric/ umbilical). Methods: Retrospective cohort study. A total of 21 patients in the postoperative period of 12 months after an anterior abdominal wall laparoscopic hernioplasty by the Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh techinique between November 11, 2005 and May 21, 2012, by the same surgeon in a private clinic in São Paulo, were submitted by telephone, to the quality of life questionnary. Results: Of the 21 patients 19% experienced recurrence of the hernia and 81% reported that nothing happened. Futhermore 19% underwent other abdominal surgery, and among these, 75% related to previously hernia correction and 81% haven’t undergone any other abdominal surgey. Conclusion: It was possible to apply the quality of life questionnary by telephone on patients who underwent an anterior abdominal wall hernia by Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh through laparoscopic approach. The results, in its turn, were satisfactory and showed that patients, in general, were satisfied with the surgical procedure. Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S50-S97 P-127 Parastomal hernia containing stomach Barber S Valencia, Spain Introduction: Parastomal hernia is the most common late stoma complications. Its appearance is usually asymptomatic. We report a parastomal hernia containing stomach. Clinic case: A 69-years-old patient with end colostomy arrived at the emergency room presenting abdominal pain associated with vomits and functioning stoma. She had a distended and painful abdomen without signs of peritoneal irritation and pericolostomic eventration in the left iliac fossa. X-ray visualized gastric fornix dilatation without dilated intestine bowels, and computed tomography showed parastomal incarcerated gastric herniation. Gastrografin®was administered, showing no passage to duodenum. She undergone surgery, with stomal transposition and placement of onlay polypropylene mesh around the new stoma. Summary: Parastomal hernias are a frequent late complication of colostomy. Only 4 gastric parastomal hernia cases are reported in the literature. 3 of these 4 cases have needed surgery. The placement of prosthetic mesh in the moment of stoma elaboration should be considered as a potential preventive measure. P-129 Posherpetic abdominal wall pseudohernia Real-Romo Z, Gil-Gallardo G, Villegas-Cabelllo O, Guajardo-Nieto D, Diaz-Elizondo A, Peralta-Castillo G, Palomo-Hoil R, Martínez-Sánchez D TEC Salud Introduction: Herpes Zoster disease affects approximately 10-20% of population. It can cause either sensitive or motor complications, when these occur, the sensitive dermatome affected during the infectious episode presents protrusion in the abdominal wall that can be confused with a true hernia of the abdominal wall. Material and methods (Case Presentation): A 44 year old male with past history of Herpes Zoster presented a protrusion in the abdominal wall at the level of the Spigelian line, it was painless and no palpable defect was detected through the physical examination. A CT scan revealed dissociation and thinning of the muscles without evidence of a true abdominal wall hernia. Discussion: Herpes Zoster occurs when a Varicela Zoster virus is reactivated, characterized by a painful skin rash limited to the skin corresponding dermatome. The incidence of complications are reported in 0-2% of the cases. The difference with a true hernia of the abdominal wall is that pseudohernia do not have a sac, neither sac contents nor a wall defect. The neurological examination provided evidence of paralysis of the muscles in the affected area. An electromyography demonstrated denervation of the affected dermatomes with fibrillation of damaged muscles. A CT scan shows diastasis of affected muscles and the absence of a true sac or defect of the abdominal wall. The physiopathology behind this complication has not been well described, although some studies have shown ganglionic lesion with denervation of sensory and motor roots that explain the signs and symptoms of the disease. Conclusion: A post herpetic pseudohernia of the abdominal wall is a rare complication and must be considered when history of Herpes Zoster is present. It is very important to identify signs and symptoms of motor dysfunction in the abdominal wall musculature, in order to achieve an accurate diagnosis and avoid unnecessary surgical procedures. Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S50-S97 S55 P-134 The future of stem cell therapy for abdominal wall defects P-145 Earlier experience of innovation in modified LPEC method to adult inguinal hernias Petter-Puchner A, Gruber-Blum S, Wittmann J, Redl H Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology Takehara H, Nishihara M, Miyahira T, Hanashiro N, Takushi Y, Aka H, Kuniyoshi F, Uehara H, Tajima K, Okushima N Okinawa Heartlife Hospital Introduction: In the past two decades stem cell therapy has evoked high hopes in many fields of regenerative medicine and today still appears as a promise not kept in most areas. In abdominal wall repair the idea of actually “healing” large defects by host´s own functional tissue is intriguing. This presentation will give an overview of recent literature and own research with emphasis of potential benefits of stromal vascular fraction SVF. The benefits are clear at hand: The processing of SVF does not require lengthy purification and cultivation and can be re-administered within a few hours after bedside preparation. Methods: Our study group has focused on the advantages of SVF for abdominal wall repair over adipose tissue derived stem cells (ASC). In sprague dawley rats SVF was gained by harvesting fatty tissue by an original minimally ina vs isv method. SVF was embedded in various scaffold materials and applied to abdominal wall defects of the same animal. Results: SVF shows the potential to be used for coverage and restorage of abdominal wall defects. In contrast to most other stem cell approaches, SVF can be easily obtained in large quantity and excellent quality. Conclusion: Bearing later translation to clinics in mind, SVF research should have high priority in the field. Other methods, including own work with vital human amnion, shall also be discussed. Background: LPEC method is introduced by Takehara for inguinal hernias in children, and is widely performed as standard surgery for the children with inguinal hernias in Japan. Purpose: The purpose of this study is to present an innovated method to adult inguinal hernias, which insert cone mesh prosthesis laparoscopically into the hernia sac via the internal inguinal ring and close the hernia orifice by LPEC method. Materials and methods: Thirteen men with inguinal hernias less than 45-year-old were treated by the modified LPEC method. The sizes of hernia orifice of these cases were less than 3 cm that were Hernia type I-1 and I-2 by classification of Japanese Hernia Society. Under 2-port technique (5mm and 2mm) by needlescopic surgery, the cone mesh prosthesis was inserted laparoscopically into the hernia sac and was fixed to the internal inguinal ring by using LPEC needle. And then the hernia orifice was closed completely by double LPEC suturing. The operation time was 45 to 60 minutes. There were no complications during or after surgery. Results and conclusion: There were no recurrences between 3 to 13 months after surgery. The advantages of the modified LPEC method are not only cosmetic due to the minimally invasive nature of the repair, but also a simplified technique and easier than other laparoscopic hernia surgery. P-142 Bilayer connected mesh device-15-year experience from surgical peer reviewed literature Gilbert A Hernia Institute of Florida The Bilayer connected Mesh Device (BCMD) (Ethicon, J&J) was introduced in April 1998 for the repair of groin hernias in male and female patients. In its fifteen years availability the manufacturing company has sold approximately two million devices to the worldwide market. It is assumed that the majority of those devices have been used to repair groin hernias. The three components of the original device (underlay patch, connector, onlay patch} were made of heavy weight polypropylene mesh. The first iteration of the BCMD was the Ultrapro Hernia System. Its newer construct combines lightweight mesh as the onlay patch with heavy weight mesh in the connector and underlay patch. A search of the peer-reviewed literature was done to collect information on the performance information of these two BCMDs. Some reports were of single product use in personal series. Others were comparative studies to other devices, materials and techniques. In evaluating the quality of outcomes in these reports information pertaining to hernia repair failures, short and long-term postoperative pain, ease of technique, time needed in OR for the procedure and other related factors noted in reports will be discussed. S56 P-146 Reduction of the chronic pain and recurrence rate. A three-year experiences using a self-adhesive mesh in TAPP – hernia repair for inguinal hernia Klobusicky P, Feyerherd P St. Elisabeth Hospital Introduction: It is commonly considered that laparoscopic hernia repairs (LIHR) are comparable to the conventional surgical methods as an equal treatment method in management of the inguinal hernias.The advantages of LIHR are supported by a clearer view of the spermatic cord content presenting a safer method in preservation of testicular function with lower incidence of an acute and chronic pain and a significantly better quality of life postoperatively in comparison to OMR. One of the last unexplained questions regarding laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair techniques was a fixation of the mesh. Materials and methods: 260 patients were operated on using the TAPP technique with a self-adhesive mesh from 07/2010 till 07/2013 in our medical facility. Complications, pain score true numeric rating scale (NRS), patient satisfaction and hernia recurrence were assessed. All patients were managed in compliance with a standard protocol and were then reevaluated 1, 6 and 12 months after the surgery using a standardized questionnaire. Patients with a fixed scrotal hernia or an ASA-Stage IV were excluded from the study. Results: 398 inguinal hernia surgeries were performed on 260 patients using the TAPP-Technique with a self-adhesive mesh during the above mentioned time frame. 138 (53%) of those, were bilateral hernias and 66 (16.6%) were cases of recurrent hernias. The average duration of surgery was 36 minutes (27-45). There was only one report of hernia recurrence (0.3%) and only one patient suffered from the chronic inguinal pain (NRS 7-10) during the mean follow-up of 24 months. Summary: Using the author´s own surgical technique incorporating also standard pre and post-operative management, the self-adhesive mesh has proven to be extremely reliable. As no specific materials to fix the mesh were needed, the method was fast, simple and economical. We could also reduce the incidence of the chronic inguinal pain. P-147 Evaluation of an innovative device (Parietex™ Composite Ventral Patch) for umbilical hernia repair García-Moreno F, Sotomayor S, Pérez-López P, Pérez-Köhler B, Bayon Y, Pascual G, Bellón J University of Alcalá Introduction: The most common treatment option for ventral and umbilical hernias continues to be the implant of a prosthetic mesh. This study compares the behaviour of a new device Parietex™ Composite Ventral Patch (Ptx) vs two devices currently used for this purpose. Materials and methods: The following materials were tested in a rabbit model of umbilical hernia repair: Ventralex™ ST Hernia Patch (Vent) (Bard Davol Inc) (n=18); Proceed™ Ventral Patch (PVP) (Ethicon) (n=18); and Ptx (Covidien) (n=18). At 3, 7 and 14 days postimplant, peritoneal behaviour and adhesion formation were assessed by sequential laparoscopy. Adhesions were scored for consistency and quantified by image analysis. The animals were euthanized at 2 and 6 weeks postsurgery. Neoperitoneum cover of materials and tissue ingrowth were determined by scanning and light microscopy. Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S50-S97 Results: Seroma was observed in 1/18 Vent, 7/18 PVP and 4/18 Ptx, mainly between the implant and subcutaneous tissue. Firm omental adhesions between the mesh and parietal peritoneum were observed in 2/9 Vent, 6/9 PVP and 3/9 Ptx at 2 weeks and in 3/9 Vent, 5/9 PVP and 1/9 Ptx at 6 weeks. Three encapsulated PVP implants (3/9) showed “tissue-integrated” adhesions affecting intestinal loops. No differences between implants were detected in the percentage surface occupied by adhesions at 14 days, though at 6 weeks, percentages were significantly higher (p<0.01; Mann-Whitney U test) for PVP versus Ptx or Vent. At 6 weeks, Ptx and Vent showed satisfying tissue repair, but contrary to Vent, Ptx was integrated in its entire surface. Conclusions: The PVP implants showed the greatest adhesion formation. Postimplant behaviour was comparable for Ptx and Vent including scarce adhesion formation accompanied by continuous neoperitoneum formation. The Ptx meshes nevertheless showed best host tissue incorporation at the intraperitoneal surface due to the initial tighter conformability of Ptx to the abdominal wall as evidenced by laparoscopy. P-150 Use of the biological mesh Permacol™ in complex abdominal wall hernia repair in the Netherlands Kaufmann R, Timmermans L, Jeekel J, Lange J Erasmus Medical Center Introduction: Complex abdominal wall hernia repair (CAWHR) is a surgical challenge. Mesh prosthesis is often indicated, but use of conventional mesh in a contaminated area is controversial. Biological meshes may provide a solution, but since these meshes are expensive and rarely used, little is known about long-term results. The aim of our study was to evaluate clinical efficacy and patient satisfaction following Permacol™ placement. Methods: In this cohort study, we included all patients operated for CAWHR with Permacol™ mesh in the Netherlands between 2009 and 2012. Patients underwent abdominal examination to assess hernia recurrence and bulging and completed Quality of Life questionnaires to assess patient satisfaction. Results: One hundred four patients met the inclusion criteria, of whom 62 have so far been seen in the outpatient clinic (33 male, mean age 60 years, median follow-up 19.8 months). With regard to the surgical intervention, the most frequently used mesh size was 600 cm2 and the most frequent postoperative complication was wound infection (n=13). Permacol™ had to be removed in 6 patients. By the time of outpatient clinic visit, 16 patients (25.8%) had had a recurrence of hernia, of whom 10 (16.1%) had undergone reoperation. Twenty-seven patients (43.5%) had bulging of the abdominal wall. When asked, 21 patients (34.0%) were satisfied with the cosmetic result. Quality of Life questionnaires revealed that patients judged their scar with a median 6.0 out of 10.0 points (IQR 4.5-8.0) and graded their health status at the outpatient clinic visit with a median 7.0 out of 10.0 (10.0 is best; IQR 6.0-8.0). Conclusion: These preliminary results show that although bulging is seen in many patients and patients are often dissatisfied with the cosmetic result, the recurrence rate and infection rates are acceptable in these complicated hernias. Permacol™ seems therefore to be an appropriate option for CAWHR. Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S50-S97 P-168 Risk factors for inguinal hernia in middle-aged and elderly men: Results from the Rotterdam study de Goede B, Timmermans L, van Kempen B, van Rooji F, Hofman A, Kazemier G, Lange J, Jeekel J Erasmus University Medical Center Background: Prospective data on the incidence of inguinal hernia and its risk factors are sparse, especially in the elderly. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of inguinal hernia in middle-aged and elderly men and to identify its potential risk factors. Methods: Data from the Rotterdam Study, a prospective cohort study of the general population aged 45 years and over of Ommoord, a district in Rotterdam, followed up from 1990 onwards for a period of now more than 20 years (n=5,780), were analysed. Diagnoses of inguinal hernia were obtained from hospital discharge records and general practitioners. Multivariate Cox-regression analyses were performed to determine risk factors for inguinal hernia. Results: A total of 416 cases of inguinal hernia were identified. The risk among male participants to develop an inguinal hernia over 20 years was 14.0%. Age-adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for inguinal hernia for men relative to women was 12.4 (95% confidence interval (CI) 9.5 to 16.3; p<0.001). In multivariate analysis, the risk of inguinal hernia increased with advancing age (HR 1.3, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.04; p<0.001). An elevated body mass index (BMI) decreased the risk of inguinal hernia: a BMI of 25 to 30 had an HR of 0.72 (95% CI 0.58 to 0.89; p=0.003) and participants with a BMI over 30 an HR of 0.63 (95% CI 0.42 to 0.94; p=0.025). Conclusion: This study shows an increased risk of inguinal hernia with advancing age and a potential protective effect of increased body mass index in the middle-aged and elderly population. P-169 A Comparison of Endoscopic Component Separation in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic and Open Hernia Repair Azoury S, Dhanasopon A, Hui X, De La Cruz C, Liao C, Lovins M, Nguyen H The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Department of Surgery Background: Endoscopic component separation (ECS) can be followed by open hernia repair (OHR) or laparoscopic hernia repair (LHR). We analyzed surgical factors and outcomes data to compare patients undergoing laparoscopic versus open ventral hernia repair after endoscopic component separation. Methods: Forty-two ECS patients who underwent ventral hernia repair with mesh were identified from a prospectively maintained database (October 2010 to July 2013). All cases were performed by the same surgeon: 25 underwent laparoscopic hernia repair, and 17 open hernia repair. Demographics and surgical factors were analyzed. Wound complications and hernia occurrences were reviewed. Results: Surgical factors and patient demographics of the two groups were not statistically different. All 42 patients achieved primary fascial closure. Operative time for the laparoscopic hernia repair group was significantly shorter than with open hernia repair (278 vs 378 min; p=0.0022). Estimated blood loss per ECS case with LHR was significantly lower than with OHR (63 vs 147 cc; p<0.0017). Hospital stay was significantly shorter for the laparoscopic group than the open hernia repair group (LHR: 4 days, OHR: 5 days, S57 p=0.0022). In both groups, wound complications occurred in 5 patients (LHR: 20%, OHR: 29%), 4 of which necessitated intervention. There was 1 midline hernia recurrence (4%) and 2 lateral abdominal wall hernia occurrences post-operatively in the laparoscopic group (mean follow-up 8 months), whereas there were no midline and 1 lateral wall hernia occurrence in the open hernia repair group (mean follow-up 11 months). Conclusion: Patients undergoing endoscopic component separation with laparoscopic hernia repair had a significantly shorter operative time and length of stay than open repair. Estimated blood loss was significantly lower in the laparoscopic cases. Wound complications were similar in both groups. There were a greater number of hernia occurrences post-operatively in the laparoscopic group, though not statistically significant. P-170 Cadaveric abdominal wall biomechanical strain analysis: supportive evidence for small bite Laparotomy Closure Dunn R, Novacek V, Ignotz R, Turquier F UMass-Memorial Health Center Size of suture stitches (distance from incised fascial margin) and suture distance between adjacent sutures have recently been shown to play a significant role in the risk of future ventral hernia. The purpose of our study was to perform cadaveric abdominal wall biomechanical strain analysis (AWSA) of different laparotomy closure techniques in an attempt to lend an objective assessment of rationale for such closure considerations. AWSA of several closure modalities were studied on unembalmed post-mortem human subjects (PMHS) (n=3). Digital image correlation was used to record strain pattern of the abdominal wall under pressure load. AW skin and fat were removed and an intact AW was loaded by internal expansion insufflation. A midline incision was created and closed. Running suture and separate stitches were compared with 5x5 and 10x10 mm for stitch interval and tissue bite size respectively. Transverse strain was selected as an indicator differentiating closure techniques. Averaged transverse strain was 1.3-1.8 times higher in 5x5 mm closure compared to intact wall and 1.2-1.5 times higher in 10x10 mm closure compared to 5x5 mm closure. Maximum transverse strain showed similar trends. No significant difference was found between continuous and discontinuous suture in 5x5 mm closure. In 10x10 mm closure, averaged transverse strain was 1.2 times higher and maximum transverse strain was 1.2 times lower in separate stitches compared to running suture. Running suture and separate stitches were equivalent in terms of tissue strain in 5x5 mm closure. Both continuous and discontinuous sutures showed high local tissue strains over 80% in 10x10 mm closure. 5x5 mm closure resulted in a strain pattern closer to the intact wall than 10x10 mm closure. S58 P-173 Prospective evaluation of self-gripping mesh (Parietex Progrip™) without additional fixation during laparoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair: one year results in over 100 hernias Bates A, Wu A, Reiner M, Jacob B Mount Sinai Medical Center Background: The use of self-gripping mesh during laparoscopic TEP inguinal hernia repairs may eliminate the need for any additional fixation without added concern for mesh migration. Long term outcomes are not yet prospectively studied in a controlled fashion. Methods: Under IRB approval, from July 2011-Sept 2012, 102 hernias were repaired laparoscopically with self-gripping mesh without additional fixation. Patients were followed for at least one year. Demographics and intraoperative data (defect location, size, mesh deployment time) are recorded. Carolinas Comfort Scale ™ (CCS), a validated 0-5 pain/quality of life (QoL) score where a mean score of >1.0 means symptomatic pain, is employed in the recovery room (RR), at 2 wks, and at 1 year. Morbidities, narcotic usage, days to full activity and return to work, and CCS scores are reported. Results: 64 patients with 102 hernias completed a mean 15.1 months follow up. 20 hernias were direct defects (average size 2.8cm). Mesh deployment time was 198 seconds. RR pain was 1.1 / 5. Total average oxycodone/acetaminophen (5 mg/325 mg) usage = 5.4 tablets, days to full activity was 1.7, and return to work was 4.5 days. 12 small asymptomatic seromas were palpated without any recurrences or groin numbness. All seromas resolved by the 6 month visit. Transient testis discomfort was reported in 8 patients. Urinary retention was 3%. Mean CCS™ scores for groin pain laying, bending, sitting, walking, and step-climbing were 0.2, 0.6, 0.3, 0.5, and 0.07 respectively. At the first postop visit, 6% had symptomatic pain (CCS >1). At 15.1 months, no patients had symptomatic pain (CCS scores = 0.05, range 0-0.8). There are no recurrences. Conclusions: Self-gripping mesh can be safely used during laparoscopic TEP inguinal hernia repairs. Recovery was rapid. In this cohort, there were no reports of chronic pain or recurrences. P-174 Post prevention eventroplasty seroma mans? Talc? Gorganchian F, Santa María V, Beltrame M, Montes de Oca J, Giunippero A, Anania S Instituto de Investigaciones Médicas Alfredo Lanari, Universidad de Buenos Aires Eventropalstía performing component separation and placement of mesh is a long-established technique for incisional hernia repair. At large dissections performed one of the most common complications is seroma. The use of talc pleurodesis is used daily to great effect, but its use is still debated eventroplasties. Are 2 cases in which large eventrations technique was conducted components sepaeacion Eventration secondary median aortic surgery. Ventral hernia repair with polypropylene mesh placement sublay. Gibson incision hernia (kidney transplant). Ventral hernia repair with mesh placement sublay made. In both cases sprinkled talcum 8gr subcutaneous plane. The patient in case 1 evolves dehiscence of skin and non-adherence to the muscular fat plane. The case 2, fever in the first 24 hours and uncontrolled pain. Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S50-S97 In literature the use of talc in the treatment of relapsing-eventroplasties seroma with preperitoneal mesh placement has been positive, but the evidence is of low grade. In our study, both patients had minor complications secondary to this treatment and even did the opposite effect to that intended, so preliminarily do not recommend the use of talcum powder to prevent seroma in conducting eventroplasties. P-175 Use of barbed suture for peritoneal closure in transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair – Experience after more than 1,000 procedures Wilke R Germany Introduction: The laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal patch plastic (TAPP) requires peritoneal closure with technical difficult intracorporeal suturing and knotting. To address this problem, we investigated the use of the Quill™ absorbable wound closure device (Angiotech, USA), which is a skin closure device with self-anchoring barbs and loops that obviate the need for knot tying. Materials: We performed TAPP within March 2011 to September 2013 in 538 unilateral and 311 bilateral routinely inguinal hernia repairs (646 males, 293 females) and investigated retrospectively. Every patient with different size (L 1-3, M 1-3, S 1-2) of hernia was included in this study. Where was no excluding factors. After adequate preperitoneal dissection, lightweight polypropylene mesh was fixed in the preperitoneal region using Fibrin glue Evicel or Securestrap™. After that, barbed suture was used for peritoneum closure. Results: The mean age was 48.6 years (range 36 to 81 years), mean BMI was 23.8 (range 16.9 to 30.1) and mean operative time was 39.5 min (range 19 to 117 min). The unilateral cases consisted of 267 indirect, 203 direct and 68 supravesical hernias, bilateral hernias shows all indirect cases and 155 direct hernias. After operation, no relevant complications were observed prior to discharge in any cases. The morbidity rate was 3.2%, and the recurrence rate was 0.4% during the follow-up of up to 2 years maximum. Discussion: Using barbed suture, we found that the peritoneal flaps can be maintained tautly, thus minimizing the distance between the upper and lower peritoneal edges, which enables placement of the next single twist suture. In addition, a significant advantage is that there is no need to tie knots at any point. Hence, barbed sutures are more advantageous, the technique can be learned quickly, skillfully, and safely. In our experience, the technical difficulty and operative time was reduced using barbed suture. Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S50-S97 P-176 A prospective outcome study of condensed fenestrated PTFE mesh (MotifMesh) in non-sterile abdominal wall defects Cheesborough J, Liu J, Dumanian G Northwestern University Introduction: Prosthetic mesh is typically avoided for hernia repairs with mild contamination (VHWG Type 3) due to the increased risk of infection and the presumed difficulty of removal if the mesh were to become infected. Condensed fenestrated polytetrafluoroethylene (cPTFE) MotifMesh has several unique properties including resistance to bacterial anchorage and infection, macroporosity, and bowel compatibility that may warrant its use in minimally contaminated and potentially contaminated patients. Methods: Ten patients with non-sterile abdominal incisional hernias were prospectively enrolled in this study and followed at set intervals for one year after direct supported ventral hernia repair with MotifMesh. All patients were evaluated for hernia recurrence, infection requiring mesh removal, and quality of life as measured by patient-reported outcomes of pain, fatigue, and mobility. Results: Nine of ten patients had no signs or symptoms of hernia recurrence at one complete year of follow up. One patient underwent MotifMesh removal for infection and as anticipated the mesh removal was straightforward and without bowel manipulation. The infection was thought to be caused by a retained remnant of infected polypropylene mesh. There were no other mesh related problems in the remaining patients. As measured by the Visual Analog Scale, patients experienced an average 50% decrease in pain after hernia repair with MotifMesh (5.7 preoperative, 2.9 one year postoperative). On the same scale, fatigue decreased by 46% (5.7 preoperative, 3.1 postoperative) and average movement improved by 62% (6 preoperative, 2.3 postoperative). Conclusions: MotifMesh was successfully utilized for contaminated or potentially contaminated ventral hernia repairs. Combining the durability of traditional synthetic mesh, efficient tissue integration, and minimal adhesion formation/ease of removal, fenestrated cPTFE may provide the optimal material characteristics for hernia repair in non-sterile settings that would otherwise require bioprosthetic mesh or staged/delayed reconstructions. P-177 A PROMISing study: open ventral hernia repair leads to decreased pain intensity and pain interference Cheesborough J, Park E, Souza J, Dumanian G Northwestern University Purpose: PROMIS is a tool developed by the NIH to provide precise measurement of patient pain. Unlike historical methods that only measure pain intensity and quality, the PROMIS Pain Survey directly assesses the impact of pain on patient behavior and the interference of pain on physical, mental and social activities. This assessment tool generates individual scores that can be compared over time and against population averages. PROMIS was utilized to prospectively measure the effect of open midline hernia repair on pain as a patient reported outcomes measure. Methods: All 57 patients who underwent midline hernia repair by the senior author between August 2010 and October 2012 with preoperative and postoperative PROMIS data were included in this study. To provide a legacy control of pain intensity, the patients were also assessed on the 11-point Comparative Pain Scale. S59 Results: A statistically significant improvement in both pain intensity (p=0.015) and pain interference (p=0.016) over an average follow up period of 7.1 months was measured using Wilcoxon signed ranks testing. Pain-related behavior did not change significantly (p=0.268). Improvement did not vary with age, BMI, diabetes, smoking, gender, or previous hernia repair. Critical analysis of the data demonstrates that pain interference with physical, mental and social activities continues to decline with increasing time after surgery. Conclusions: PROMIS Pain Survey provides a precise, multifaceted evaluation of pain and demonstrates in a novel manner the benefit of abdominal wall reconstruction-significant improvements in both pain intensity and pain interference following open midline hernia repair. The scores improve with length of time since surgery, and, although behavior did not change significantly, the trend is towards improvement. While not possible in a single surgeon study, PROMIS may be the ideal tool to compare patient reported outcomes across various types of abdominal wall reconstruction. P-179 Eventraciones post-trasplante renal: análisis de factores de riesgo y técnica quirúrgica Gorganchian F, Santamaría V, Beltrame M, Montes de Oca J Instituto de Investigaciones Médicas Alfredo Lanari, Universidad de Buenos Aires Diferentes factores aumentan el riesgo de eventraciones post trasplante renal, y existen para su resolución diferentes técnicas quirúrgicas.En este trabajo se intenta analizar la experiencia en eventraciones post trasplante renal realizada en nuestra institución. Se realizó un estudio retrospectivo analizando los trasplantes renales realizados entre 2006-2013. Se analizó la tasa de eventración post trasplante renal, las comorbilidades asociadas, las complicaciones postoperatorias y la tasa de reoperación. De aquellos que fueron sometidos a eventroplastía se analizó la técnica quirúrgica utilizada y sus complicaciones. Se realizaron test de Chi cuadrado e IrwinFisher.Se realizaron 62 trasplantes renales por incisión de Gibson. La incidencia de eventraciones fue de 12.7%. Se analizaron como factores de riesgo: Diabetes, hipertensión arterial, tiempo de diálisis, cirugías previas, complicaciones post trasplante inmediato y terapia inmunosupresora. Todos ellos resultaron estadísticamente independientes de la aparición de eventraciones, probablemente por influir al combinarse entre sí y no cada uno por separado. Siete pacientes fueron sometidos a eventroplastía. Un paciente presentó infección del sitio quirúrgico que resolvió con tratamiento antibiótico.En concordancia con la bibliografía aquellos pacientes en lo que no se utilizó malla o se usó una malla reabsorbible tuvieron una recidiva del 100%. Se debe estudiar más ampliamente los factores de riesgo que influyen en el desarrollo de eventraciones post-trasplante debido a las contradicciones que surgen de la bibliografía. La eventroplastía post-trasplante renal es segura y efectiva siempre y cuando se realice con malla no reabsorbible. El riesgo de infecciones post-quirúrgicas no parece verse afectado por la utilización de malla cuando se toman los recaudos necesarios, y si sucede no modifica el pronóstico. Respecto a la utilización de mallas separadoras de componentes es extremadamente útil dado que pueden estar en contacto libremente con el riñón injertado y recomponen la pared abdominal libre de tensión. S60 P-180 Retrospective comparison of 3d mesh devices (uhs and phs) in inguinal hernia repair Premnath R Association of Surgeons of India (ASI) Introduction: Inguinal hernia is a common condition and there is today a trend towards lightweight meshe repairs. Achieving a low recurrence rate with lower incidence of chronic groin pain is one of the primary aims. We retrospectively compare the 3d mesh devices, ultrapro hernia system (UHSOV1) and prolene hernia system (PHSE) in the management of inguinal hernia. 3D mesh devices consist of onlay and underlay patch which are connected together. They have the benefit of a posterior and anterior repair via an anterior approach. Methods: PHS hernia repairs performed between January 2005 and June 2009 were compared with UHS mesh hernia repairs performed between August 2008 and June 2012. Demographic data such as age, gender as well as comorbid conditions such as COPD, heart disease, diabetes, hypertension, prostatism, and chronic cough were collected. Complications such as seroma, hematoma, urinary retention, orchitis and wound infection were recorded. Recurrences in each group were also recorded. A student t test and chi-square analysis were used for statistical analysis. Results: 210 valid cases entered the study. UHS 127 & PHS 83. All patients were followed upto February 2013. There was no significant difference with regards to age, gender or comorbidities. In general the trend for chronic pain and recurrence appeared to be decreasing with UHS. When we measured satisfaction ratio as being pain free, recurrence or discomfort, then the PHS group shows 74.7% satisfaction as opposed to 85.5% with the UHS group. Conclusion: Our study shows, UHS is significantly better when compared to PHS in terms of recurrence and chronic groin pain. UHS may be better alternative to PHS in inguinal hernia repair suggesting that light weight mesh may be the way ahead. P-181 Pre-operative groin discomfort can predict persistent post-operative groin pain despite a successful laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair Carter J, Jenkins M, Coombs N Great Western Hospital Introduction: Laparoscopic hernia total extra-peritoneal (TEP) repair, performed by appropriately experienced surgeons, is the standard repair for recurrent or bilateral inguinal herniae. Potential benefits include reduced post-operative pain, earlier recovery and reduction in long-term pain. This study determines factors that may predict risk of developing long term complications. Method: A retrospective review of male patients undergoing TEP repair of all hernias was performed. Operations were performed by a single consultant surgeon. Comparison was made of pre-operative symptoms and signs, operative findings and post-operative patient reported symptoms. Results: Between 2009 and 2012, 91 patients required TEP repair (mean age 54.7 years, range 25-78) fifteen (16.5%) had been referred with recurrence after previous open repair. Patients with recurrence were more likely to present with pain than those with primary hernias (86.6% vs 51.7%, p=0.02, χ2=5.05). At consultation 35 (38.4%) had bilateral symptoms or signs. At operation 127 herniae were repaired (14 direct, 104 indirect, 9 pantaloon). Of the four (3.2%) converted Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S50-S97 to open repair, two (1.6%) were irreducible inguino-scrotal herniae. One (0.8%) developed a recurrence. Mean time to follow up was 22 days. Mild post-operative discomfort was more frequently reported in patients with pre-operative groin pain (10.2% vs 2.2%, p=0.1, Fisher’s exact test). Only two patients (both with significant preoperative pain) required referral to a chronic pain specialist. Discussion: Patients with pre-operative groin discomfort need to be warned of the potential risk of persistent groin pain despite successful TEP hernia repair. Laparoscopic TEP repair by an experienced surgeon carries a very low risk of recurrence, conversion to open procedure or long-term complications yet, while the frequency of these complications was universally low, patients need to be informed of these risks. However, TEP repair remains the treatment of choice for most patients with reducible inguinal herniae. P-183 Midline hernia closure Ross N Shouldice Hospital Primary suture technique in 747 midline hernia repair Nagui A. Ross, MD, MSc Surgery, FCFP Department of Surgery, Shouldice clinic, Thornhill, Ontario, Canada Introduction: The Shouldice hospital remains one of the last battle grounds to champion the pure tissue repair for all kinds of abdominal wall hernias. Although general surgeons operate on a great number of these hernias, large series are absent from the literature with the largest series studied 146 of such patients. We carried a review of a series of 747 midline abdominal wall hernias performed between 2003 and 2013, at the Shouldice hospital by one of the surgeons (the author). Method: Those cases reviewed were divided into 430 umbilical repair, 74 Paraumbilical, 137 epigastric, and 106 trocar site incisional hernias. Using primary suturing technique with double breasting with continuous layers of 2/0 polypropylene as the first two layers, and 32 gauges stainless steel wire suture material for the second, we followed these patients five weeks, one year, and annually afterwards. Results: Only 2 reported recurrences over 10 years period were found, representing a 0.003% rate, surgical site infection in only 3 cases with the same rate of 0.004%. The size of the defects ranges between 0.5 cm-6 cm with a mean of 2.6 cm. The age group ranges between 16-83 years old, with mean of 44 years old. The mean BMI was 24.9 with 80% male predominance. Conclusion: We believe that primary suturing technique using these two materials with double breasting proofs to be the near to the ideal method of closure of such midline hernias. A video presentation is enclosed with this abstract to elucidate the technique described. Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S50-S97 P-184 Comparison of Polysoft patch with Modified Kugel patch on postoperative pain in inguinal hernia repair: a randomized controlled trial for assessing noninferiority Okinaga K, Hori T, Inaba T, Yamaoka K Okinaga Clinic Background: Preperitoneal patch placement has some advantage: the patch is applied to the deep surface of the posterior abdominal wall and it is not contact with the nerves in the inguinal canal. Although Polysoft patch (P) and Modified Kugel patch (K) are available for the preperitoneal repair in Japan, P is lightweight and K is heavyweight. Both patches have permanent memory ring and each has a different configuration. The aim of this prospective study is to show that P is non-inferior to K with respect to strength of postoperative chronic pain. This presentation shows the design of a randomized controlled trial for assessing non-inferiority study. Methods: Primary inguinal hernia patients were included in this study. Inguinal hernia repair was performed at three different hospitals (O, F, & T). In total 431 patients were allocated randomly either to P or K from November, 2010 to December, 2012. Surgical technique includes the recommended procedure of preperitoneal blunt dissection and placement of the patch after the inguinal canal opening. At O clinic 1% lidocaine was administered locally supplemented with intravenous midazolam sedation, at F hospital and T hospital laryngeal mask anesthesia was employed. A questionnaire including pain visual analogue scale (VAS) was sent to patients by mail one month, six months, and one year after surgery. The study was conducted as an unblinded randomized controlled trial for assessing noninferiority of P comparing to K with 5% non-inferiority margin. Discussion: The proposed study will provide practical information about the usefulness of the Polysoft patch in inguinal hernia repair. Data on the effect evaluation will be available in 2014. Trial Registration: UMIN R000013636. P-185 Laparoscopic hernioplasty and multiple surgery, preliminary results Clinical Hospital University of Chile Alban M, Carrasco J, Dominguez C, Rappoport J, Silva J, Palacios F, Salazar V Hospital Clinico Universidad de Chile Introduction: Laparoscopic surgery is an alternative for the treatment of hernias and multiple surgery. Advances in prosthesis, mesh fixation and instruments with early return to work and less postoperative pain under this method has enabled progress in perfecting this technique. Materials And Methods: We evaluate our digital database of the Hernia Unit of the Clinical Hospital of the University of Chile, made in File Maker Pro including 46 variables. From January 2011 to June 2013, 102 patients were operated for a total of 164 hernias by this method, 16 of these cases also had other pathology of surgical resolution. Results: 50 (49%) women and 52 (51%) men have been operated by this technique, the average age was 52 years, with a BMI of 28 (17-41). Surgery time: 104 minutes (30-250), with three days hospitalization (1-5). 47 (46%) showed only one hernia, the remaining cases have multiple hernias (2 rings: 39 patients, three rings: 14 patients, 4 rings: 2 patients). The surgery was elective in 100%. S61 Hernia type: Inguinal 57%, incisional 19.5%, other 23.5%. In 100% prosthesis was used, light polypropylene for inguinal (TAPP) and composite mesh for incisional hernias. In 16 cases other surgical pathology resolved in the same surgery without requiring conversion to open surgery procedure; installation of peritoneal dialysis catheter 3 patients, cholecystectomy 11 cases, sleeve gastrectomy 1 case, transurethral prostatectomy 1 case. There was no mortality in this series. Conclusions: Laparoscopic surgery appears to be a safe technique for the treatment of hernia associated with other diseases. We need more studies and monitoring to recommend this technique. P-187 Lichtenstein’s hernioplasty with long-term resorbable mesh: preliminary pain results at 4-year follow up Ruiz-Jasbon F, Norrby J, Ivarsson M, Björk S Hallands Hospital, Kungsbacka Background: Pain and recurrence are the most common long-term complication after hernia repair. Conventional nonabsorbable synthetic implants for hernia surgery may lead to chronic pain probably due to foreign body reaction with subsequent chronic inflammation. TIGR Matrix Surgical Mesh, a long-term resorbable mesh, has in pre-clinical studies been shown to stimulate the formation of new tissue capable of carrying the abdominal loads and theoretically could get less chronic pain after hernia surgery. Methods: This was a prospective study in 40 patients with primary inguinal hernias in Sweden. Patients were enrolled for Lichtenstein repair using TIGR Matrix. The primary endpoint was safety as assessed by monitoring the incidence of Adverse Events (AE) and Serious Adverse Events (SAE) related and unrelated to the mesh and rehabilitation. The secondary endpoint was the performance of the mesh with respect to pain and discomfort. Patients have been followed up at 0.5, 1, 3, 6 and 12, 24, 36 months. The 48 follow-up is currently ongoing. Pain assessment has been performed using a visual analogue scale (VAS 0-100) and the Inguinal Pain Questionnaire, (IPQ); another questionnaire was used in order to follow up different factors affecting the patients’ QOL. Recurrences are included in the follow up of AE. Results: All patients followed a normal postoperative course. After 24 months, no Serious Adverse Events were reported, two patients experienced mild pain (VAS<10) and only four patients could feel the sensation of a mesh in their groin. This compares favorably with previously published data. A total of 4 hernia recurrences were found at 24 months follow up. Preliminary results up until 4-year follow up will be presented. S62 P-188 Crossing the tails of the mesh or not: a prospective randomized study for repair of direct inguinal hernias Kulacoglu H, Yazgan A, Olcucuoglu E Ankara Diskapi Teaching and Research Hospital Parviz Amid, the director of the Lichtenstein Hernia Institute, stated in his paper in 2004 that suturing the tails of the mesh together in a parallel position is a known cause of recurrence lateral to the internal ring, therefore the tails of the mesh should be crossed behind the spermatic cord. However, there has been no study to test this principle clinically. This technical modification is probably very important for indirect hernias however its effect in repair of direct hernias is rather questionable. Besides, crossing the tails to create a doublebreasted mesh lateral to the ring may create a heavier part for the prosthesis and discomfort postoperatively. Method: We conducted a prospective randomized study to search if the crossing provides more secure repair and causes postoperative discomfort. 100 consecutive patients with direct hernia were allocated in 2 groups with crossing (gC) or not (gN). Crossing was done by suturing cranial and caudal tails of the mesh together at the inguinal ligament. Results: Mean follow-up times were 594 and 564 days. No recurrences were recorded in either group. Two patients in gC developed severe chronic pain and underwent reoperations. VAS scores at day 1, 7, 30, 90 and 365 were significantly higher in gC. Median SF-36 score was 1±2.5 in gC and 0±1.0 in GN at day-30 (p<0.001). Both groups displayed very low SF-36 scores after one year although the median score was still higher in gC (0±2.50 vs 0±0.95, p<0.001). Comment: Lichtenstein repair provide very good results, however crossing the tails of the mesh may cause postoperative discomfort. Suturing the tails together in parallel position does not seem to be resulted in recurrence in mesh repair of direct inguinal hernias. P-189 Early complications after cyanoacrylate glue mesh fixation in incisional hernia repair Kumar S The Royal Infirmary Background: Very little is known about use of cyanoacrylate glue in mesh fixation at open ventral hernia repair though its use has been widely reported in groin hernia surgery. Aim: To assess early complications and effectiveness of cyanoacrylate glue in mesh fixation at open incisional hernia repair. Patients and methods: 15 patients with a median age of 66 years (range 28-3), including10 males had incisional hernia repair between May 2012 and Sept 2013. After dealing with the hernia sac, a polypropylene mesh was secured in the retro-muscular plane. One to two ml of cyanoacrylate glue was used to fix either part or whole of the mesh by spot welding technique. The wound was drained if considered appropriate. All patients received a single prophylactic dose of antibiotic. Data on size of the hernia defect and size of the mesh used was recorded prospectively. Patients were reviewed in the outpatient clinic 6-8 weeks after surgery. Results: Of the 15 patients, 3 (20%) had recurrent incisional hernias. Median hospital stay was 1 day (range 0-6). The hernia defect was a median of 6 cm (range 4.5-12 cm). Polypropylene mesh used was a median 275 square cm (range 63-420). Post op complications developed in 5 (33%) patients: seroma 2 (one drained spontaneously), Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S50-S97 wound infection requiring oral antibiotics in 2, and one patient required hospital admission for abdominal pain but settled spontaneously. No patient with chronic pain or recurrence till date. No patient developed mesh infection. Conclusion: Cyanoacrylate glue may be safe and effective in mesh fixation at incisional hernia repair. P-190 Metachronous contra-lateral inguinal hernia Nagahama T, Ando M, Ami K, Ganno H, Arai K Toshima Hospital Introduction: Development of contra-lateral inguinal hernia after unilateral hernioplasty is not rare condition. Most of the etiology for those lesions was supposed to be subclinical hernia already present at initial surgery. But in a few cases development of another primary hernia can be observed. We have evaluated herniographic finding and the etiology of metachronous bilateral inguinal hernia. Object and results: From 2004, 653 patients (unilateral 504, bilateral 149) received preoperative herniography and subsequent surgery. Radiographically apparent hernias were treated simultaneously even if subclinical. During follow up (5-82months) after initial surgery, 17 patients developed contra-lateral hernia. Retrospective evaluation of initial herniography revealed that 7 cases demonstrated patent processus vaginalis, 9 cases demonstrated dilatation of internal ring while 2 cases have no radiographic finding. Among 59 patients with history of surgery for prostate cancer 7 patients developed metachronous lesion, which was statistically higher than those without prostate cancer surgery (p<0.01 7/59 11.9% vs 10/445 2.2%) Discussion: In our series 17 patients among 504 patients who has no radiographically proven hernia at initial diagnosis developed contra-lateral lesion during follow up. Patients who had history of prostate cancer surgery demonstrate higher incidence of metachronous contra-lateral lesion than who had no history of prostate cancer. Retrospective evaluation of herniography finding demonstrated that most patients who developed contra-lateral lesion had some minimal radiographic finding such as patent processus vaginalis or dilatation of internal ring. These results support the fact that inguinal hernia is common for the patients who have previously history for prostate cancer, and that unilateral hernioplasty may enhances development of inguinal hernia on the contra-lateral side. Conclusion: Another primary contra-lateral inguinal hernia is rare condition but can be developed from minimal change of abdominal wall. For the patients after prostate cancer surgery the incidence of metachronous lesion is particularly higher. Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S50-S97 P-191 Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair, a modified technique combined with trans-fascial sutures and peripheral stapled fixation Hata T, Hasegawa T, Yoshida K, Yanaga K The Jikei University School of Medicine Background: Even though laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) has proved to be an efficient and safe procedure, its recurrence rate remains high. There is a criticism that the trans-fascial sutures induce pain. Aim: Diminishing postoperative recurrence and pain in LVHR with combined technique with trans-fascial sutures and peripheral stapled fixation. Patients and methods: Six consecutive patients with ventral hernia defect up to 15cm in diameter underwent LVHR. After standard adhesiolysis, a composite mesh overlapping the hernia defect at least 5cm on each side was fixed with 4 point trans-fascial sutures by rather loose knotting and peripherally placed tacks. No drains were used and abdominal binding was recommended. Results: No patient complained pain regarding trans-fascial sutures. At 20 months follow-up no recurrence and complication was observed. Conclusion: Despite of a small sample, the study suggested that LVHR with trans-fascial suturing and peripheral stapling is an effective procedure. P-192 Abdominal wall reconstruction in the octagenarian Zabel D, Conway M, Kalish E, Belgrade J Christiana Care Health System Many patients have large ventral hernias. These hernias may get larger if not repaired in a timely fashion. Elderly patients are often denied elective treatment of large ventral hernias due to co-morbid risks. Many patients present with emergent complications from their ventral hernia which require surgery. We feel that elective treatment of complicated ventral hernias is favorable to emergent treatment. We have routinely considered elderly patients with large ventral hernias for elective open ventral hernia (OVH) repair with component muscle separation (CMS). We retrospective reviewed our prospectively maintained data-base for patients with age greater than or equal to 80 years who underwent elective OVH repair with CMS and placement of polypropylene mesh in the retro-rectus or pre-peritoneal space. Outcome parameters included hospital length of stay, surgical site occurrence and hernia recurrence. We identified 6 patients with follow-up 9-36 months (mean 16). Patient demographics showed age 80-95 (mean 85), BMI 26-30 (mean 29), and hernia width 7-12 cm (mean 9). All patients had failed at least 2 hernia repairs prior. All patients had rectus muscle closure assisted by an open external oblique component separation. Two patients had retrorectus polypropylene mesh placement and the others had 1,500 cm2 placement of the same mesh in the pre-peritoneal space. Five patients were clean and 1 patient was contaminated. No patients had surgical site occurrences or wound dehiscence. Hospital length of stay was 386 days (mean 23). No hernia recurrences were noted. One patient represented a prolonged length of stay complicated by alcohol withdrawal. There’s very little published about the outcome of complicated OVH repair in the elderly. As our patient population ages, and more individuals demand active lifestyle, we feel that octogenarian patients should not be denied treatment for their abdominal wall dysfunction secondary to hernias. S63 P-193 Abdominal wall reconstruction in the massively morbidly obese patient Zabel D, Conway M, Kalish E, Belgrade J Christiana Care Health Systems Obesity may be a contributing factor for patients with a large ventral hernia. Standard repairs have a high recurrence rate. Open ventral hernia (OVH) repair with component muscle separation (CMS) is not often performed in the obese patient because of the potential for poor outcome. Many centers refuse this type of repair in patients with a body mass index (BMI) over 45 kg/cm2. We retrospectively reviewed our prospectively maintained data-base for patients with BMI greater than 50 kg/cm2 who underwent elective OVH repair with CMS and placement of polypropylene mesh in the pre-peritoneal space. Outcome parameters included hospital length of stay, surgical site occurrence, and hernia recurrence. Fifteen patients with follow-up 6-42 months (mean 21), age 32-63 years (mean 51), BMI 50-76 (mean 55), and hernia width 5-24 cm (mean 13) were included. One patient did not have complete rectus re-approximation. All patients had pre-peritoneal placement of at least 1500 cm2 light weight polypropylene mesh. Eleven patients were clean and four patients were clean contaminated. Eleven surgical site occurrences occurred and eight were managed with a return to the OR. One patient developed an enterocutaneous fistula which led to a prolonged hospital stay. Hospital length of stay was 3- 88 days (mean 18). No hernia recurrences were noted. No mesh was removed. Little is published about the outcome of complicated OVH with CMS in the massively morbidly obese patient. Although patient optimization with weight loss is encouraged in our patients, realistic expectations for patients can push the need to have this surgical procedure. Although hernia recurrences were zero, wound complications were high. Interestingly, after we adopted a perforator sparing mid transverse incision to our patient population, the wound morbidity diminished as evidence by our patient with a BMI of 76 kg/cm2 who had no surgical site occurrence. S64 P-194 Hybrid Laparoscopic Open-Assisted Repair (HLOAR) for complex incisional hernias: A review of the hybrid technique in comparison to an initial experience Miller K, Raval M, Nagle A Northwestern University The ideal surgical approach to large, complex incisional hernias remains controversial, but typically involves an open approach with creation of large soft tissue flaps. We describe a novel hybrid technique which the combines the benefits of both the open and laparoscopic approach. The Hybrid Laparoscopic Open-Assisted Repair (HLOAR) consists of an initial targeted open incision with adhesiolysis and resection of the hernia sac. A large mesh is placed in the intra-peritoneal position and under direct vision four trans-fascial sutures are placed. Additionally, under direct vision, the initial 5-mm trocar is placed lateral to the mesh. The fascia is then closed primarily above the mesh. If required, a separation of components can be added via separate flank incisions. Pneumoperitoneum is established and the mesh is laparoscopically secured to anterior abdominal wall with fixation tacks and additional trans-fascial sutures. A total of three patients underwent HLOAR with average age of 55, operative time 290 minutes, mesh size of 20x25 cm, and LOS 3.4 days. There were no hernia recurrences with average follow-up of 9 months. A review of the literature yielded only six similar case reports. We compare our results to the limited available data. Long-term results of the HLOAR technique are not available. The HLOAR technique maintains the principles of a tensions-free mesh repair with adequate mesh coverage and restoration of the rectus muscles to the midline. In addition, HLOAR has the potential for improved outcomes by combining the advantages of the both the open and the laparoscopic approaches. Specifically, compared to an open approach, HLOAR avoids the need for a large soft tissue dissection and its associated morbidity. Additionally compared to a laparoscopic approach, HLOAR may provide decreased operative times, decreased potential for enterotomies or missed enterotomies and allows closure of the hernia defect. P-195 Obturator hernia: diagnosis and treatment Ross S, Oommen B, Kim M, Mckinney W, Criss CR, Heniford B, Augenstein V Carolinas Medical Center, Dept. of Surgery, Division of Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgery Introduction: Obturator hernias (OH) are rare and can be difficult to diagnose by physical exam or radiographic imaging. While an open inguinal approach does not allow for visualization of the obturator space, laparoscopy is an excellent approach for diagnosis and repair of OH. We describe our experience with the diagnosis and management of OH. Methods: A prospectively maintained, institutional, hernia-specific database was queried from 2004-2013 for all OH. Demographics, pre-operative imaging, operative details, and outcomes were collected and analyzed by standard statistical methods. Results: There were 15 OH in 14 patients: 13 unilateral and one bilateral. All OH were diagnosed intraoperatively. Inguinal hernia was the most common preoperative diagnosis (85.7%). Two patients had no hernia on exam but had intractable pelvic pain and had diagnostic laparoscopy. 78.6% of OH were incarcerated, 14.3% were Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S50-S97 recurrent. Concomitant inguinal hernias were present in 78.5% of cases; three patients had an associated femoral defect (21.4%). Six patients (42.9%) had a CT or MRI preoperatively, but OH wan not diagnosed radiographically. All hernias were repaired laparoscopically with a light weight polypropylene mesh by TAPP. Mean follow up was nearly 2.5 years (28.7±23.9months). The vast majority of patients (90.9%) had complete symptom resolution by their first follow up. Interestingly, the two patients undergoing diagnostic laparoscopy due to chronic pelvic pain had complete resolution of pain by their first visit. Post-operative pain scores were significantly lower than pre-operative pain score (0.5±1.2 vs 3.8±4.0, p=0.017). There have been no hernia recurrences or recurrence of symptoms. Conclusions: Obturator hernias are difficult to diagnose by history, physical exam, or by radiologic imaging, and are likely to occur with other groin hernias which can obscure their diagnosis. Laparoscopy is the ideal modality for both diagnosis and treatment of OH. Repair of OH results in decreased pain and complete resolution of symptoms in a high percentage of patients. P-196 A novel reinforcing approach for abdominal wall reconstruction with 2,400 cm2 mesh Zabel D, Conway M, Kalish E, Belgrade J Christiana Care Health Systems Open ventral hernia (OVH) with component muscle separation (CMS) is utilized in complex, large ventral hernia repairs. Data has suggested that utilizing a reinforcing material improves outcomes with this open technique. Hernia recurrence after successful placement of reinforcing material usually occurs beyond the limits of the reinforcing mesh. Placement of larger reinforcing mesh is appealing in order to minimize recurrence. The size of the reinforcing material is anatomically restricted in all planes except the pre-peritoneal space. After a flank hernia recurrence in our series of 168 patients with 1,500 cm2 of barrier coated large pore low surface area polypropylene mesh in the pre-peritoneal space, we introduce a technique for essentially wrapping the three-dimensional contours of the entire abdominal cavity with 2,400 cm2 of barrier coated mesh along the mid-line and non-barrier coated mesh along the posterior-lateral abdominal wall. We retrospectively reviewed our prospectively maintained data-base for patients that had an abdominal wall reconstruction with 2,400 cm2 of light weight polypropylene mesh. Outcome parameters include surgical site occurence, hernia recurrence and hospital length of stay. Twenty four patients age 37-80 years (mean 55), BMI 26-56 kg/cm2 (mean 41) with a hernia width 5-22 cm (mean 10) were included. There were eight surgical site occurences (33%), four of which were managed with operative intervention. Hospital length of stay was 526 days (mean 10). Follow-up from 6-23 months (mean 13) with no hernia recurrence. Historical recurrence rates of more than 25% for complex, open ventral hernia repairs are no longer acceptable. Placement of a large, durable, strong, predictable and tolerable mesh at the time of repair should improve outcomes even further. To our knowledge, and review of the literature, this represents the largest surface area mesh reinforcement placed in the abdomen. Early results demonstrate it is well tolerated with low recurrence rates. Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S50-S97 P-197 Hybrid operation (laparoscope assisted hernioplasty: LAH) for reduction of the pain and shortening of incision in a ambulatory groin hernia under the local or epidural anesthesia Imazu H, Imazu Y Imazu Surgical Clinic Introduction: I perform a hybrid operation to use a laparoscope with local or epidural anesthesia for a ambulatory groin hernia operation (laparoscope assisted hernioplasty: LAH) from 2012. This operation has the following merits.1, shortening of the wound, 2. It is more exact than the naked eye, because of expansion.3.post operative pain is slight. 4.can go home in a short time. Method: I perform the Direct Kugel method for indirect hernia and perform the Kugel method in direct hernia from 1.5-2cm length wound. Until the handling of hernia sac, I perform both methods by this method. After this processing, I perform the detachment of prepetitoneal fat tissue layer from a wound using laparoscopy. I detached as much as possible between peritoneum and prepetitoneal fat tissue layer. After detachment, I measure a detachment range and insert mesh of size as big as possible. The mesh which I insert it in prepetitoneal fat tissue layer, and unfolded enough using laparoscope. Result: I was operated on to 165 patients (175 lesions). Their sex ratio were 90:10 (males: females), with mean age of 57 years (range 22-88). The type of hernia was indirect hernia 143 lesions, direct hernia 34 lesions, and combine type 2 lesions. Right side hernia 85 cases left 70 cases and bilateral 10 cases. All cases average operation time were 49min. In time of operation, all cases. All cases came home on same day and no recurrence and no severe complications. Conclusions: There was not the case that a day surgery was not possible, but, as for an operative time having become long. The severe complications are not seen after operation, and the inguinal hernia day surgery is basically possible in all cases by LAH. P-198 Laparostomy in tuberculous peritonitis Reddy A, Cunnigaiper N, Narayanan M, Jagan B Sri Ramachandra University Laparostomy is a valuable procedure in fulminant peritonitis, often saving lives. It helps in free drainage, prevents abdominal compartment syndrome and allows inspection of viscera in doubtful viability. Tuberculous peritonitis caused by perforation is common in the Indian subcontinent posing a challenge to the surgeon as the bowel loops are plastered. The management of laparostomy wound poses a technical challenge testing the ingenuity of the Surgeon. Limited literature is available on the use of composite mesh in the management of laparostomy wounds, more so in tuberculous patients. Herein, we present a case of a twenty year male with features of Tuberculous Abdomen, for whom an Ultrasound Abdomen and diagnostic Laparoscopy was done. Biopsy revealed a necrotizing granulomatous lesion and patient was subsequently started on Anti Tuberculous Therapy. At Laparotomy, we could not identify the site of perforation, there was gross faecal contamination of the peritoneal cavity and no loop of bowel could be exteriorized as a controlled fistula. We chose to perform a laparostomy and placed drains to have access to the peri- S65 toneal cavity. A composite mesh was sutured to the edges of the rectus sheath. The composite mesh placement is useful in that it helps in early ambulation of the patient, prevents the rectus from moving away from the midline, protects the bowel and helps in free drainage of contaminated fluid through the peritoneal cavity. Anti Tuberculous Treatment was continued and patient began to improve symptomatically. Two months later, there was a healthy layer of granulation tissue. This was subsequently grafted. Patient remains healthy at the end of eight months. Thus, we find that the use of composite mesh acts as a media between laparostomy and definite closure. P-199 Laparoscopic repair of ventral hernia: Can we make it a less painful surgery Rahman S, Kanth R al ain ahospital Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair is now an established operation. The advantage is prevention of wound infection and the use of large size mesh to reduce the recurrence rate. However the pain in ventral hernia repair is a disadvantage and concern. Different techniques have been used to reduce pain in ventral hernia like use of absorbable tacker, avoiding transfacial sutures, use of local anesthetic agents etc. All these technique have failed in reducing pain. We, at Alain Hospital are presently developing a technique to suture the mesh intra-peritonealy with minimal use of tackers. We started this technique in May 2013. Patients are followed up regularly with regards to pain and recurrence rate. So, far we operated on 12 patients. Our initial result with regards to pain is very encouraging. Both acute and chronic post-operative pain was less, which was evident by the patient’s requirement of analgesics and outpatient visit. The purpose of this presentation is to show the technique and thereby put this into discussion ’how the post-operative pain in ventral hernia repair can be lessened by simple technique’. S66 P-202 Contaminated ventral hernia repair using Component Separation Technique with synthetic mesh is safe Slater N, van Goor H Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre Background: Large ventral hernia repair represents a major surgical challenge, especially under contaminated conditions. Synthetic mesh placement is often deferred from due to fear of mesh-related complications necessitating its removal. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the safety of contaminated large ventral hernia repair using Component Separation Technique (CST) with non-absorbable synthetic mesh placement, focusing on infectious complications and mesh removal. Methods: Retrospective chart review took place of consecutive patients that underwent CST with synthetic mesh placement for ventral hernia repair between 2000 and 2013. The primary outcome was early (< 30 days postoperative) or late Surgical Site Infection (SSI) with a focus on mesh infection and mesh removal. Patients groups were formed based on Surgical Wound Class (SWC); 1: ’clean’, 2: ’clean-contaminated’, 3: ’contaminated’ and 4: ’dirty/infected’. Outcomes were compared between groups. Results: One hundred thirty-seven patients were included in analysis. Mean age, BMI and size of defect were respectively 58.6 (range 2179) years, 26.6 (17.9-45.9) kg/m2, and 361.2 (24-1,050) cm2. SSI’s occurred in 6/56 (10.7%) patients in SWC 1. In the non-clean wound settings SSI’s occurred in 10/34 (29.4%, SWC 2), 4/19 (21.2%, SWC 3), and 9/28 (32.1%, SWC 4) patients (p=0.034). Six SSI’s (4.4%) involved the mesh resulting in explantation: 2 in both SWC 1 (3.6%) and SWC 2 (5.9%) and 2 in SWC 4 (7.1%). Twenty-four (17.5%) hernias recurred after 15 months mean follow-up and was not dependent upon SWC (p=0.629). Conclusion: Two to three out of ten repairs of large contaminated ventral hernias with synthetic mesh become infected, however with low risk of mesh loss. P-203 Quantitative evaluation of abdominal wall hernias using anatomical labeling Baucom R, Xu Z, Allen W, Asman A, Landman B, Poulose B Vanderbilt University Medical Center Background: Classification of ventral hernias (VHs) remains cumbersome and is not well standardized. The European Hernia Society (EHS) classification is the most widely accepted system; however, it lacks quantitative metrics. We hypothesize that computed tomography (CT) offers a wealth of underutilized information that can be used to precisely characterize VHs. We developed an image labeling protocol to segment hernia-related anatomic structures and identify metrics that might be useful for predicting clinical outcomes, including loss of domain. Methods: CT images for 47 general surgery patients were viewed using image-processing software. A labeling protocol was developed to identify key layers of the abdominal wall, fascial defects, hernia volume, and skeletal landmarks. Intra- and inter-rater reproducibilities were tested, and the ratio of hernia to intraabdominal volume was calculated. This ratio was then correlated with primary fascial closure. Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S50-S97 Results: The intra- and inter-rater reproducibilities of the protocol were tested, and mean surface distance tolerances of 2-5mm were achieved for all labels. The prevalence of VH for our population was 64%, and the mean ratio of hernia volume to intraabdominal volume was 0.09 (range 0.0006-0.41). Twelve patients underwent VH repair with intent for primary fascial closure and mesh sublay. Six patients required a bridge for closure and 6 did not. The mean ratio of hernia to abdominal volume in patients who required a bridge was 0.14 (range 0.08-0.30), whereas the mean ratio for the patients who underwent primary fascial closure was 0.008 (range 0.002-0.02). The mean ratio was significantly different between groups (p=0.01). Conclusions: CT image labeling for VHs is reproducible and offers promising metrics that could be used to better describe hernias and help determine optimal individualized techniques for repair, especially in the setting of loss of domain. P-204 Improved outcomes in the management of high-risk incisional hernias: A single centre experience Skipworth J, Vyas S, Uppal L, Floyd D, Shankar A Royal Free and University College London Hospital Complex Hernia Unit Introduction: Incisional hernia repair (IHR) is complex in the setting of previous/current infection, loss of domain and bowel involvement: often on the background of co-morbidities such as obesity, diabetes and malignancy. Repair methodologies previously described are associated with significant morbidity, leading our unit to develop a novel technique for complex IHRs. Methods: A retrospective review of IHRs performed as a combined, single-stage procedure, by a general and plastic surgeon, was undertaken (Feb 2009-Sep 2013). Standardised repair involved radical resection of soft tissue with hernia-sac, component separation (where necessary), intra-peritoneal mesh-insertion (Bard™ composite for ventral hernia working group (VHWG) grades 1 and 2; Strattice™ biological for grades 3 and 4, and high-risk grade 2), midline fascial closure, and abdominal wall reconstruction (with soft-tissue flaps where necessary). Results: 95 (69 biological/26 composite) patients underwent IHR (64% female; median age 59 years; BMI 31.5 kg/m2; length of stay 8 nights; follow-up 22 months). 9 (9%) patients were VHWG grade 4, 47 (49%) grade 3, 28 (29%) grade 2 and 11 (12%) grade 1. 27 (28%) were recurrent hernias, 19 (20%) had diabetes and 31 (33%) had malignancy. 25 (26%) patients developed complications including 18 (19%) surgical-site occurrences; 3 (3%) returning to theatre; 7 (7%) respiratory and 3 (3%) cardiac complications. Clinical follow-up revealed 4 (4%) hernia recurrences: 1 has undergone further repair and 3 are asymptomatic and undergoing active follow-up. None of the patients have required mesh-removal. Conclusions: Despite the high-risk cohort, this technique is associated with a low incidence of recurrence and a low risk of surgicalsite occurrences (including 0% mesh-explantation), a finding that may be dependent upon comprehensive resection of poorly-vascularised soft-tissue (bioburden reduction) and abdominal wall reconstruction utilising healthy tissue. Furthermore, the low incidence of surgical-site events in grade 2 patients repaired with synthetic mesh has led to a change in our unit’s practice, with biological mesh now exclusively reserved for grade 3/4 IHRs. Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S50-S97 P-205 Rives-Stoppa, endoscopic and anterior components separation for hernia repair: does technique influence outcomes? Muse T, Zwischenberger B, Miller M, Davenport D, Roth J Department of Surgery, University of Kentucky College of Medicine Introduction: The Rives-Stoppa repair is considered the gold standard for repair of complex abdominal hernia defects. Open and endoscopic anterior components separation are alternative options for a ventral hernia repair. The aim of this study is to evaluate wound complications, hospital readmission, and hernia recurrence after Rives-Stoppa repair compared to open and endoscopic components separation. Methods: A retrospective review of patient demographics and outcome measures was conducted of patients who underwent an open ventral hernia repair between 2006 and 2011. The search was limited to the following repairs: endoscopic components separation with mesh (Endo CS), open components separation (CS) with mesh, open components separation without mesh, and Rives-Stoppa repair. Characteristics were compared between the groups using chi-square tests or analyses of variance as appropriate. Significance was set at p<0.05. SPSS™ version 21 (IBM Corp., NY, New York) statistical software was used. Results: A total of 362 patients underwent a ventral hernia repair with Endo CS (53 patients), CS with mesh (126 patients), CS without mesh (117 patients), and Rives-Stoppa (66 patients) techniques. No differences were found between groups in terms of demographics and co-morbidities. Average follow-up was 392 days. The previous number of repairs varied significantly (p<0.001) between groups with Endo CS used to treat patients with the greatest number of previous repairs. There were no significant differences between groups for wound complications (p=0.57), hospital 30-day readmission rate (p=0.898), or hernia recurrence (p=0.137). Conclusion: Open and endoscopic anterior components separation have comparable outcomes to the Rives-Stoppa technique alone. Endoscopic components separation is a viable option for complex ventral hernia repairs, particularly multi-recurrence hernias, without added morbidity. P-206 Incarcerated diaphragmatic hernia in pregnant with intrathoracic bowel obstruction after right liver donation Bardella R, Fernandes V, Garcia D, Ripardo J, Ushinohama A Hospital da Luz, Vila Mariana Patient 29 years old female, 31 weeks of pregnancy, presenting the last four days with chest pain, dyspnea and vomiting. Past medical records: Right liver lobe donor in 2005. Previous medical history unremarkable. CT scan was performed and shows right pleural effusion and right diaphragmatic hernia (small bowel herniated with no signs of ischemia). Steroid was administered for lung maturation 24 hours before delivery. Due to clinical worsening, surgical treatment was indicated. First cesarean section was performed and followed by laparotomy in the same surgical procedure. The child was born without complications. S67 Findings: Strangulated Segment of 25 cm of the terminal ileum with enteric fluid in thoracic cavity and large amount of omentum also ischemic. Treatment: Enterectomy and primary anastomosis; right hemithorax drainage and diafragmatic suture. In the ICU, the patient developed drug-induced acute renal insufficiency (vancomycin) which resolved with dose adjustment and hydration. Oral intake was started on the fourth day post surgery, with good acceptance and normal bowel movements. The chest tube was removed on the 7th pos operative day. On the 25th pos operative day, mother and child were discharged without complaints. Right-sided diaphragmatic hernia in pregnant patient (previous liver transplant donor) has not been described before. There has been a few reports of right-sided diaphragmatic hernia in pediatric living donor liver transplant recipients, and in right lobe donor hepatectomy patients. So, the aim of this case report is show an extremely rare complication of a living liver transplant donor patient in a very especial situation, that was not described before. P-208 Meta-analysis of sublay versus onlay mesh repair in incisional hernia surgery Timmermans L, Goede B, Dijk SM, Kleinrensink G, Jeekel J, Lange J Erasmus MC Background: Incisional hernia (IH) remains the most frequent postoperative complication after abdominal surgery. The treatment of choice for IH surgery is mesh repair. The two techniques most frequently used are the onlay repair (OR) and sublay repair (SR). Both techniques have their merits; however it remains unclear which is superior with regards to IH recurrence, operation time and postoperative complications. Methods: A meta-analysis was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed publisher and Cochrane library was performed. The quality of the non-randomized studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS). Results: Out of 178 papers, 10 studies (2 randomized controlled trials, 1 prospective study and 7 retrospective studies) were selected comprising 1948 patients. Two of the studies scored below 5 points on the NOS and were not selected for meta-analysis. A trend was observed for IH recurrence in favour of SR (OR 2.41, 95% CI 0.99 to 5.88, I2 70%, p=0.05). SSI occurred significantly less after SR (OR 2.42, 95% CI 1.02 to 5.74, I2 16%, p=0.05). No difference with regards to seroma and hematoma could be discovered. Data regarding operation time, postoperative pain and fistula could not be pooled. Conclusion: Although the majority of included studies were of retrospective nature, SR seems the preferred technique for IH repair compared to OR. S68 P-212 Giant inguinal hernia: pneumoperitonium + Stoppa technique Marins C, Loss A, Oliveria P, Rosa R, Gitahy A, de Freitas L Brazilian Giant inguial hernia is a not so frequente pathology, defined when the hernia reaches below the middle of the tights. Several methods are usually employed attempting to reduce the hérnia contente without respiratory difficults. The authors present a case of a midde-aged man with a giant inguinal hernia submitted to a 12 liters pneumoperitoneum during 14 days and then operated with a pre-peritoneal mesh reinforcement (Stoppa technique) and no organ resection. P-215 Evaluation of a novel antimicrobial coated non-crosslinked acellular porcine dermal matrix Novitsky Y, Liese R, Scott J University Hospitals Case Medical Center Introduction: Biologic graft bacterial colonization may result in accelerated degradation and diminished performance. Antimicrobial coating of biologic grafts may resist bacterial adherence and improve bacterial clearance. We aimed to evaluate the antimicrobial efficacy of a novel rifampin/minocycline polymer-coated non-crosslinked acellular porcine dermal matrix device (ABX-ADM) in vitro and in vivo after inoculation with Methicillin-resistant Staphyloccus aureus (MRSA) or Escherichia coli (E.coli) in a rabbit model. Methods: ABX-ADM was compared to 5 biologic/biodegradable grafts (Strattice, Permacol, Surgimend, XCM and Bio-A). For the in vitro evaluation: 5 samples of each device were placed onto MuellerHinton agar plates, inoculated with MRSA or E.coli., and Zone of Inhibition (ZOI) was calculated post-incubation. For the in vivo evaluation: 60 male New Zealand White Rabbits were implanted with two 3.8cm diameter samples (n=10 per group), and randomized for inoculation with either MRSA or E.coli. After 7 days, each device underwent quantitative analysis for viable colony forming units (CFU). Both ZOI and CFU data were evaluated by Mann-Whitney test, with p<0.05 considered significant. Results: ABX-ADM demonstrated significantly greater ZOI, as compared to all other devices. After explantation, ABX-ADM demonstrated complete inhibition of MRSA colonization, as compared to significantly greater MRSA colonization of Strattice and Bio-A. Premature euthanasia was required for all MRSA-inoculated Surgimend and XCM animals. ABX-ADM also demonstrated complete inhibition of E.coli colonization, as compared to significantly greater colonization in the Strattice, Permacol, Surgimend and XCM groups. Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S50-S97 P-216 Evaluation of an experimental model of onlay polypropylene mesh versus light composite monocryl/polypropilene mesh Grossi J, Cavazzola LT, Manna B, Nery LA, Montes JHM, Bau R, Roll S PUCRS Background: Adhesions are due to the exposure of prosthesis to the intra-abdominal contents and it is an important factor to its importance in surgical complications clinic. Objective: To evaluate an experimental model of hernioplasty with the placement of an onlay polypropylene mesh (PP) or a composite lightweight polypropylene and monocryl mesh (UP). Materials and methods: An experimental study, with a sample of 28 female Wistar rats. They were randomized into 3 group (1 with 8 animals - control and 2 groups with 10 animals). In all three group a 1 cm diameter defect was created in the rectus muscle. The 3 groups were divide as: skin closure (sham - 8 animals), PP mesh and UP (10 animals each). Samples were analyzed for the presence of adhesions, it’s extent, the strength necessary for their rupture and involved organs. Retraction of the mesh was analyzed. All animals were killed 21 days after the procedure. Results: All groups showed adhesions. PP group had worst extension of adhesions when compared to UP and sham group. The force for adhesion rupture did not differ between meshes studied. Adhesions involved mostly the omentum and only in the PP group there were adhesions with the round ligament (liver) in 50% and small bowel in 20% of the animals, p=0.004. Exposed area of the defect was 0.83±0.18 cm2 in the sham group; 0.90±0.09 cm2 in the PP group and 0.60±0.18 cm2 in UP; p<0.001. Conclusion: All groups showed some degree of adhesions. One of the explanations for the lowest percentage of adhesions in the UP group is the smaller exposed area (with the greatest retraction of the mesh) compared to the other groups. Keywords: Hernia, Monocryl Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S50-S97 P-217 Wound and mesh complications after ventral hernia repair are expensive: the cost is more than just money Colavita P, Zemlyak A, Tsirline V, Burton P, Dacey K, Walters A, Lincourt A, Augenstein V, Kercher K, Heniford B Carolinas Medical Center Introduction: Wound complications, including wound and mesh infections, following ventral hernia repair (VHR) are expensive, but the price is more than money alone. Methods: Prospective, consecutive, open VHRs from 2008-2011 were analyzed with extensive 1 year follow-up. Wound infections, wound complications (breakdown, seroma requiring intervention, abscess), and mesh infections were examined. Charges incorporated all hernia-related visits, interventions, and readmissions within one year. Results: Five hundred consecutive open VHRs were analyzed. Patients were 57.2% female, mean age 56.4 years, BMI of 33.1, and 60.6% had recurrent hernias. Defect and mesh sizes were 198.3 cm2 and 784 cm2. 27.0% had a previous wound infection, and 6.6% had an active infection at the time of VHR. Panniculectomy and component separation were performed in 31.8% and 25.6% of cases. 293 patients had no infections or complications (NC), 21.8% had noninfectious wound complications (WC), 17.4% had wound infections without mesh infections (WI), and 2.2% developed mesh infections (MI). Mean hospital charges were: NC- $38,677, WC- $51,843; WI$65,240, and MI- $82,779 (p<0.0001). Mean follow-up charges were: NC- $1,393, WC- $6,213, WI- $20,232, and MI- $63,389 (p<0.0001). NC had 2.4 average post-operative visits, WC had 4.3, WI required 6.7, and MI averaged 9.2. Readmission was necessary for 57.5% of WI and 90.9% of MI. At 2 and 4 week follow-up, there were no differences in patient QOL with and without complications/infections. At 6-months, 57.6% of patients with complications/infection had discomfort/pain versus 35.4% without complications (p=0.01), 58.6% versus 29.9% (p<0.001) had activity limitations, and 52.5% versus 34.2% reported mesh sensation (p=0.031). Conclusion: VHR wound-related complications yield significant cost on many levels: financial impact during and after hospitalization, increased patient and physician time investment, and reduction in patient QOL. Efforts to reduce VHR wound-related complications should be strongly pursued. P-219 Reasons for readmission following repair of primary and recurrent ventral hernias Elegbede A, Tevis S, Greenberg J University of Wisconsin Introduction: Readmission to the hospital following ventral hernia repair is a common and costly problem. The goal of this study was to evaluate which factors influence 30-day re-admission rates following ventral hernia repair. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of NSQIP data on ventral hernia repairs performed at our institution between 2006 and 2012. Patients were divided into two groups based on whether their hernia was primary or recurrent. Groups were then compared based on demographic information, operative intervention, co-morbidities, and reason for readmission. Student’s t-test was used for continuous variables and Chi-square test was used for categorical data. S69 Results: 468 ventral hernia repairs were performed during the study time period. 407 (86.9%) were primary hernia repairs and 61 (13.0%) were recurrent hernia repairs. Additionally, 68 (14.5%) were performed laparoscopically while 400 (85.5%) were performed open. Baseline demographics were similar between the two groups expect for BMI which was significantly higher in the recurrent group (31.5 vs 37.4, p=0.0001). Thirty-day re-admission occurred in 4.4% of primary and 1.5% of recurrent hernias. Surgical Site Infection was the most common reason for readmission in both groups (55% of readmitted primary patients and 67% of readmitted recurrent patients). While laparoscopic repair was associated with fewer readmissions in both the primary (OR=0.76, p=0.71) and the recurrent groups (OR=0.19, p=0.26), neither reached statistical significance. Other common reasons for readmission were failure to thrive (4 after primary repair and 1 after recurrent repair) and exacerbation of baseline illness (3 after primary repair and 1 after recurrent repair). Conclusions: Surgical Site Infection is the most common cause for readmission after ventral hernia repair. Patients who underwent open repair were more likely to be readmitted than those who were repaired laparoscopically. As reimbursement for readmissions falls, further work is needed to identify high-risk patient populations. P-222 Evolution of component separation technique; a systematic literature review Bökkerink W, Slater N, van Goor H Dept. of Surgery, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre Background: Component Separation technique (CST) is a widely used method for fascial closure in patients with large incisional ventral hernias. Since its description by Ramirez in 1990 surgeons tried to find solutions to decrease the high rate of wound complications and reherniation associated with CST. The aim of this study was to systematically review all papers on CST and compare the results of CST modifications. Methods: Medline, EMBASE and the Cochrane database were searched systematically for studies on CST and incisional ventral hernia. Quality of papers was assessed by the modified MINORS score. Data on surgical technique, short and long term outcomes were extracted. Subgroup descriptives and comparative analyses were performed. Outcomes are presented as weighted pooled proportions. Results: 56 studies were included, all but one retrospective, describing 2885 patients. Mean wound complications and recurrence rates were 24.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 19.9-29.9) and 11.2% (7.8-15.1) after CST without mesh; 29.0% (4.0-66.0) and 18.8% (10.2-29.4) after CST with absorbable mesh; 25.0% (18.0-32.0) and 14.9% (4.1-30.9) after CST with non-absorbable mesh; and 37% (25.0-50.0) and 10.5% (5.7-16.6) after CST with biological mesh. Subgroup comparison showed that CST with biological mesh had a higher wound complication rate (compared to all other subgroups, p<0.001). Long-term outcomes showed no differences between CST with or without mesh. Wound complications occurred less after posterior CST and endoscopic CST (compared to classic CST, p=0.0005 and p<0.0001, respectively). Furthermore, fewer recurrences were reported after posterior CST (p=0.0166). Conclusion: There is an abundance of literature on CST, however, most studies are of poor quality. There are significant differences in study outcomes between the mesh materials used in conjunction with CST. Based on the current literature, biological mesh is inferior regarding short-term outcome. New modifications including posterior CST and endoscopic CST show promising results. S70 P-223 Abdominal wall tension: a new vital sign for ventral hernias Hope W, Christian D, Hooks W, Clancy T New Hanover Regional Medical Center Hernia size and mesh size remain the standard reporting metrics when discussing ventral hernia repair. When evaluating success of components separation techniques length of fascial advance has traditionally been used. Very little is known regarding the impact abdominal tension has on hernia formation and its impact on hernia repair. The purpose of this project was to evaluate a novel method for evaluating abdominal wall tension to its effect on abdominal wall closure. Following IRB approval, a prospective study of patients undergoing hernia repair or laparotomy was performed. Patient demographics, operative information, and outcomes were documented. Abdominal wall tension measurements were obtained in the operating room by placing two Kocher clamps on the fascia at the mid portion of the incision. Two separate scales were then were hooked onto the handle of the Kocher clamps. The clamps were then pulled until the fascial edges met in the midline. Measurements on the scales were then recorded. Five patients have undergone tension measurements during hernia repair. Average age was 63 years with all patients being Caucasian and 80% males. All patients underwent open repair of incisional hernia with either incision of the posterior rectus sheath or a transversus abdominus release. Average length of the incision was 22cm. Average total pounds of tension for hernia patients at the midportion of the wound was 12.2 lbs (range 2.6-22.1 lbs). Average total pounds of tension following transversus abdominus release in 4 of the patients was 5.7 lbs. All patients had a decrease in the total amount of tension following retrorectus and transversus abdominus release. This preliminary study shows the feasibility of measuring abdominal wall tension and suggests a potential for its use during complex ventral hernia repair. The implication of these tension measurements and their impact on clinical decision making and outcomes requires further study. P-224 Series of 169 cases of hernioplasty retro muscle Grossi J, Mottin C, Padoin A, Alves L, Ramos R, Monteiro P, Agra A PUCRS Background: The ventral incisional hernias represent a complication of a surgical procedure performed previously. Present in large numbers, with an incidence of approximately 10-15% of all laparotomies, and in series there recurrence after repair of up to 67% without mesh insert. Objective: To evaluate the mesh in incisional hernioplastias position retro-muscular performed at the Hospital São Lucas-PUCRS, Brazil. Methods: Retrospective study selected repair retro-muscular mesh in ventral hernioplasty. From January 2006 to December 2012. Performed by the team of COM (center of morbid obesity) in hospital São Lucas. Results: We selected 169 patients with a mean age of 52±12.9 years, of both sexes, with a predominance of females with 118 (69.8%) and male 51 (30.1%). The initial surgery was the most common gastric bypass (bariatric) with 126 (74.5%), followed by laparotomy 34 Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S50-S97 (20.1%), subcostal cholecystectomy and cesarean section with 3 (1.7%) cases each, plus a case aortic aneurysm, prostatectomy, appendectomy (open). The location of the hernia was more frequent in the epigastric region with 108 (63.9%), umbilical 52 (30.7), infra-umbilical 6 (3.5%) and subcostal with 3 (1.7%) cases. The time between initial surgery and hernioplasty was 3.7 years. The mean duration of surgery was 2 hours and 16 minutes. The length of stay was 4 days. The number of recurrences reoperated the period was 19 cases (11.2%), 10 (5.9%) in the epigastric region. The correction time between hernioplasty and recurrence was 1.7 years. Conclusion: The surgical repair mesh retro-muscular position is considered an option for treatment of ventral incisional hernia mainly in the epigastric region after bariatric surgery. P-225 Quality improvement through social media: an initial look at the international hernia collaboration facebook group Chui P, Jacob B Mount Sinai Hospital The widespread accessibility to social media platforms, such as Facebook™, affords the surgical community an extraordinary opportunity to participate in the rapid global exchange of education and ideas. Made up of surgeons, healthcare providers, and vetted medical device industry partners, The International Hernia Collaboration Facebook™ group is a new example of a professional-to-professional-to-industry group where exchange of information is centered on the concept of improving patient outcomes. As its founders, we wanted to review the initial statistics surrounding its growth during the first 9 months of its use. Since its inception in December 2012, the group has expanded to 302 individually vetted members. 102 members are located internationally and represent 36 individual countries, including Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Algeria, Syria, Russia, Brazil, Japan, Colombia, Guatemala, and Mauritius. 260 members are either surgeons or members of an academic institution, while 42 members work within industry. Of the nearly 200 unique posts made to this forum since its creation, 40.9% of the posts involved questions about individual case presentations; 39.8% sought technical expertise in some aspect of hernia repair; 10.2% involved questions about materials used in hernia repair; and 7.8% discussed pain after hernia procedures. 27.3% of the posts used de-identified images, including CT scans and videos. Remarkably, the vast majority of the posts garnered a substantial number of responses from other members, ranging from 4 to 46 responses per post. Our initial review of The International Hernia Collaboration Facebook™ group demonstrates that social media can be used professionally as an effective tool that provides rapid global collaboration with limitless possibilities, all designed to optimize patient care. Whether providing education to students and residents, market feedback to industry partners, or technical advice and opinions to colleagues, this group, and other groups like it, are revolutionizing the way the medical community collaborates. Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S50-S97 P-8224 Histological profile of a porcine acellular dermal matrix (Strattice™) 31 and 36 months after implantation: two clinical case reports Sawyer M, De Deyne P Comanche County Hospital Use of mesh reinforcement in incisional herniorrhaphy is the standard of care; however, an unresolved question centers on the durability of a biological scaffold in humans. We present the histological profile of Strattice™ Reconstructive Tissue Matrix (LifeCell Corporation, Branchburg, NJ) more than 30 months after initial placement in humans. A biopsy of the abdominal wall was obtained and standard histopathology and immunohistochemistry was performed in 2 patients: Patient #1, an 82-year-old male, presented with a ventral hernia (class III) resulting from rectal cancer surgery 3.5 years prior. The cancer and a portion of the abdominal wall were resected and Strattice was used to repair the defect. Thirty-one months later, he experienced a third manifestation of rectal cancer and was re-operated; a biopsy was obtained. Patient #2, a 54-year-old male, presented with a ventral hernia (class III) which was surgically repaired using Strattice. Subsequently, he gained 80 lbs, leading to a minor recurrence repaired with Parietex™ (Covidien, Mansfield, MA). Twentyeight months later he had MVA-related abdominal trauma, which was repaired with Parietex (a biopsy was obtained). Histopathology for patient #1 showed robust recellurization, and remnants of Strattice were visible; immunohistochemistry (against laminin) showed mature arterioles inside the composite of host-Strattice tissue. The tissue sample of patient #2, while showing some fibroblast infiltration in the Strattice material, also had pronounced foreign-body response and chronic inflammation in the tissue around the synthetic material. Immunohistochemistry showed myofibroblasts and macrophages around the Parietex mesh but not in the Strattice material. These observations support the durability of a biological mesh and support the findings from others that synthetic materials may lead to persistent chronic inflammation and scarring. Biological scaffolds supporting fibroblast infiltration and graft acceptance should be considered in surgical reconstruction of the abdomen where the goal is restoration of functional tissue. P-9207 Management of incarcerated inguinal hernias in the era of laparoscopy Nakata R, Suzuki H, Chihara N, Watanabe M, Uchida E Institute of Gastroenterology, Nippon Medical School, Musashikosugi Hospital Background: The transabdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) approach has been the first choice for adult inguinal hernias in our department since 2009. TAPP technique offers the following advantages: 1. Diagnostic accuracy; 2. The bilateral groin can be checked and immediately repaired; 3. Relief of postoperative pain and wound discomfort; and 4. Earlier rehabilitation. We have expanded our indication to incarcerated cases with the advancement of our technical stability and safety. Methods: In our strategy for incarcerated inguinal hernia, we first verify the viability and peristalsis of the incarcerated bowel with enhanced computed tomography and abdominal ultrasonography followed by reduction. Even if reduction is possible, we perform surgery within 24 hours to avoid false reduction or late perforation. If reduc- S71 tion is impossible, we determine the viability of the incarcerated bowel segment based on color, peristalsis, and venous congestion by laparoscopy. When the bowel resection is not required, TAPP is performed in the usual manner. If bowel resection is required or the bacterial contamination is suspected, we postpone TAPP for the protection of the prosthesis infection. Results: We experienced 13 cases (14 hernias: 1 direct, 11 indirect, 2 femoral) between 2009 and 2013. In 9 cases TAPP was simultaneously performed after laparoscopic observation confirming the viability of the incarceration bowel segment. TAPP was performed in 3 cases within 24 hours after undergoing reduction and postpone TAPP was performed in the remaining cases because the incarcerated bowel was perforated by strangulation. No conversion to open surgery occurred. The median operative time was 107 minutes (53-221) including a bilateral case. The median postoperative hospital stay was 4 days (2-8). Recurrence has not been seen nor any adverse event exceeding Grade 3. Conclusion: It can be considered that TAPP can offer benefits in reliable therapy and minimally invasive not only for elective cases, but also incarcerated cases. P-9667 Posterior component separation safely addresses recurrences after external oblique release herniorraphy Juza R, Jackson T, Haluck R, Soybel D, Pauli E Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center Introduction: Anterior component separation (ACS) with external oblique release for ventral hernia repair has a reported 20% recurrence rate. Managing recurrent hernias after ACS is challenging because of iatrogenically-altered myofascial planes and perceived loss of abdominal wall integrity. We report our experience and short term follow-up of four patients who were successfully managed with posterior component separation (PCS) and transversus abdominis release (TAR). Methods: Patients with recurrent ventral hernia after ACS were retrospectively identified from a prospectively-collected hernia database. All patients were symptomatic and were not acceptable candidates for laparoscopic repair. Open PCS herniorraphy with sublay lightweight polypropylene mesh was performed under general anesthesia. When defect size was sufficiently large, TAR (as described by Novitsky) was added to permit primary midline fascial closure. Results: Four patients (3 female, mean age 53) underwent PCS after ACS for midline hernia recurrence. There was an average 2.3 prior ventral herniorraphies. All patients had undergone previous external oblique release. Average Body Mass Index was 37 with an American Society of Anesthesia class of 3. Two patients had controlled diabetes mellitus and 2 patients had prior methicillin resistant S. aureus wound infections. Mean operative time was 357 minutes and mean defect size was 309 cm2. Two patients (50%) required TAR for adequate mesh overlap and midline defect closure. Mean length of hospital stay was 7 days. There were no surgical site occurrences or recurrent hernias at a mean of 6 months follow up. Conclusions: This is the first report of PCS with TAR for ventral hernia recurrence after ACS. Despite multiple comorbidities, the patients had no wound morbidity and no evidence of early recurrences. All have resumed normal activity with no perceived functional limits. Although longer term follow-up is necessary, PCS with TAR appears to be a safe option for abdominal wall reconstruction following failed ACS. S72 Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S50-S97 P-9733 Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair – How we do it P-10469 Results from the first HRFU-Mission in Paraguay Solecki R, Szura M, Matyja A, Kulig J Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Reinpold W, Schroeder A, Torres O Wilhelmsburg Gross Sand Hospital Incisional hernia is a complication following laparotomy, with an estimated incidence of 10% compared to about 20% after conservative procedures. The prosthetic herniorrhaphy, and especially sub-lay technique, decreased reccurence rate of hernias to 10%. Laparoscopic repairs of incisional hernia reduced reccurence rate still further to below 5% and were accompanied by a low rate of postoperative complications (wound infection, seroma or haematoma formation, urinary retention or pneumonia). According to the Polish National Health Fund data, about 6000 incisional hernia repairs are performed in Poland each year. Of 6000 incisional hernias, only about 10% laparoscopically, and the remaining with conservative methods. Most frequently used laparoscopic technique is IPOM (Intraperitoneal On-lay Mesh). The major limitation for laparoscopic incisional hernia surgery in Poland is cost of the procedure. The IPOM procedures have been performed at the Ist Department of General, Oncological and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College since 2007, and the authors are presenting possibilities and limitations of this technique. Having in mind benefits of the laparoscopic ventral hernia repairs we hope to perform more such procedures in future as soon as the financing system of medical procedures changes in Poland. Currently 78% of the Paraguayan population has no health insurance. Access to health care is difficult and government funding is limited. For most patients, mesh repair of inguinal and ventral hernias is too expensive due to high mesh costs. This presentation shows results of the first Hernia Repair for the Underserved (HRFU)-Mission in Asuncion, Paraguay. HRFU is a non-profit organization performing charitable hernia surgery in the United States, the Dominican Republic, Haiti, Guatemala, Ecuador and now Paraguay. The Mission was coordinated by Prof. Charles Filipi, founder of HRFU from Creighton University. The surgeries and education were carried out by lead surgeon Dr. Wolfgang Reinpold and our team. During an 8day period, we provided free hernia repair for 76 patients at the Hospital Nacional and Luque District Hospital in Asuncion. We repaired 86 inguinal, ventral and incisional hernias (71% inguinal hernias) by using primarily the Lichtenstein technique. Following the EHS-Classification for size of inguinal hernias, 54% of inguinal hernias were considered large with a mean diameter of 3.6 cm (range 1.0-5.0 cm). The mean operating time was 66 min (range 35-210 min). There were no acute perioperative or immediate postoperative complications. As education and capacity building is an important part of HRFU-Missions, Dr. Reinpold successfully educated three Paraguayan surgeons using the HRFU Lichtenstein hernia rating form system. In conclusion, we consider the first HRFU-Mission in Paraguay to be a great success with high potential for subsequent missions in order to make a difference for thousands of patients in the coming years. P-9903 Sutureless Lichtenstein repair for inguinal hernia: short- to mid-term outcomes Wada N, Furukawa T, Kitagawa Y Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine Introduction: Lichtenstein repair is recommended for the treatment of many types of adult inguinal hernia in European Hernia Society Guidelines published in 2009. Recently, a self-fixating mesh with advanced microgrip technology is commercially available. With this mesh, fixation with the entire mesh surface may reduce the tension at the suture points and potential risk of chronic pain. Here we present our current technique and short- to mid-term clinical results of Lichtenstein repair for inguinal hernia. Methods: Surgical repair for inguinal hernia was performed for 460 patients in our institution from December 2009 to June 2013. Of these patients, a total of 393 patients (85.4%) were treated with Lichtenstein method using self-fixating mesh. A skin incision of 3.5 cm was made under local anesthesia with 0.5% lidocaine. Intravenous administration of 35 mg of pethidine and 0.4 mg of flunitrazepam was the standard protocol for conscious sedation. Prophylactic antibiotic was given once within 30 minutes prior to surgery. Pre-shaped polyester mesh with microgrip was placed as an onlay mesh and overlapped onto the pubic tubercle. Results: Mean age was 68.4 +/- 11.4 years. Median duration of surgery was 96 minutes and estimated blood loss was less than 10 mL. Median hospital stay after surgery was 1 day. We observed 16 cases (4.1%) with post-operative minor complications (10 hematomas and 6 seromas) which were treated conservatively without aspiration. During a media follow-up period of 24 months, one patient (0.25%) developed recurrent hernia at 3 years (a direct recurrence after direct hernia). No patient needed medication for chronic pain. Conclusions: Sutureless Lichtenstein repair using self-fixating mesh could be a feasible and safe method for inguinal hernia patients in Japan. P-10550 Chronic postoperative pain & discomfort classification: through dermatome mapping Alvarez R PROBEN Chronic post operative pain following a surgical procedures oriented to repair a defect of the inguinal or abdominal area or in some cases related to a kidney intervention, cesarean procedure or thoracotomy with the result of lumbar or thoracic nerve injury is a non pleasant situation for any surgeon and frequently a devastating event for the patient, therefore these situations demand a diligent analysis and especially an accurate classification which provides the closest idea of the clinical status with a accurate and homologous language. This classification should include all different descriptions of pain and its location and level of intensity, also should determine the structure or structures involved. Currently is not enough to refer to these complex events with ambiguous terms or just call it a “painful groin”. Dermatome mapping is the most frequent clinical test used by neurologist and physicians in general and it´s classification allows us to assess, classify and mainly refer with a specific language those broad manifestations that unfortunately come with these events. This tool not only evaluates pain but also the discomfort associated with foreign body such as meshomas, granulomas & denervation either incidental or therapeutic. The signs & symptoms expressed by every patient vary since not all events have the same source and therefore not all post operative pain should have the same approach and treatment. The dermatome mapping classification provides a test to evaluate postoperative pain & discomfort and objective criteria for its proper diagnosis and treatment. Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S50-S97 P-10824 Laparomesh hernia repair: five years in cubans patient. Molina E, Lalán J, Mora O, Larios L, Tamayo J Cuba Objective: Report our experience in the Laparomesh mesh use for the treatmen of many hernias the medline and incisional hernia prevention. Methods: A total of 47 patients that underwent surgery at Manuel Fajardo and Juan Bruno Zayas Teaching Hospitals, from November 2008 to May 2013, with incisional hernias of the midline or risk to develovent incisional hernias were presented, with repair by Laparomesh mesh. In our series a careful preoperative arrangement was made that included the local preparation of the skin. Cefazolin was used as a prophylactic antibiotic in all cases. Follow-up times were: monthly for the first year, each 3 months four for the second. Results: There was no trans-operative complications, no found sepsis. There have been no manifestations of rejection to the prosthetic material up to now. No immediate complications as seroma or hematoma of the surgical found were reported. No hernial relapse was observed with an average follow-up of 3 years. Conclusion: Our experience showed that Laparomesh mesh was a good option to the treatmen and prevention of incisional hernia. P-11073 The role of pure tissue repairs in a tailored concept for inguinal hernia repair Koch A, Lorenz R Center for Hernia Surgery The Guidelines of the EHS set a clear recommendation that a mesh should be used in every male Patient above the age of 18. But is there a strong evidence fort hat? A Cochrane Review shows that the use of mesh is associated with a lower rate of recurrence but the quality of included studies, assessed with jaded scale, were low. The Guidelines don´t respect the Classification of the EHS. In clinical praxis it is necessary to include the Hernia size in to the decision process for an individualized concept in inguinal Hernia repair. The critical Analysis of the available studies and the results of a prospective study of 1,500 consecutive cases with a minimal follow up of 12 month will discuss the role of Suture Repairs yet. The current study shows the results of 1,500 inguinal hernia repairs from 2006 to 2013. The median age was 48 years. 30% Suture Repairs and 70% Mesh Repairs. There is an minimum 1 year follow up. Recurrence Rates: overall 0.8%, Suture Repair 0.6% and Mesh Repair 0.8%. There were no major complications. The infection rate was 0.4% in the mesh and 0.3% in the suture group. Conclusion: In opposite to the EHS Guidelines we can show the place for suture repair in an tailored concept. For EHS I Hernias the suture repair is a good choice with low recurrence rates, especially in young males. The failure of the guidelines ist hat they don´t discriminate between the different hernia sizes. S73 P-11228 Mesh ingrowth with concomitant bacterial infection resulting in inability to explant: A case series of Parietex mesh repairs Hanna M, Dissanaike S Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center Purpose: Removal is the standard treatment for mesh infection following prosthetic hernia repair. However certain types of mesh may be less amenable to removal even in the setting of active infection; we present four such cases, all involving the same composite mesh. Methods: Four high-risk patients underwent Parietex mesh implantation for large ventral wall hernias and developed subsequent staphylococcus infections with attempted explantation of infected mesh and wound care. Results: There was inability to completely explant mesh in all four cases, leading to chronic purulent wounds and long term complications. Conclusions: While mesh infection is a recognized complication of prosthetic hernia repair, many synthetic meshes form a slimy biofilm and thus can be removed relatively easily. However the structural qualities of certain types of mesh create ingrowth into tissues even in the setting of infection, resulting in inability to explant with subsequent long-term chronic wound complications. P-11555 Laparoscopic repair of a canal of nuck cyst and indirect inguinal hernia Gustafson M, Pellini B, Daoud I St. Francis Hospital and Medical Center The canal of Nuck is a peritoneal evagination accompanying the round ligament into the inguinal canal in females. The equivalent of the processus vaginalis in males, it typically obliterates early in life. A patent canal can lead to an indirect inguinal hernia or hydrocele. A noncommunicating hydrocele of the canal may be termed a canal of Nuck cyst. This is rare and typically presents as a painless, cystic mass above the labia majora. Traditionally, treatment of a canal of Nuck hydrocele has been surgical excision via an open anterior approach. Reviews of the literature suggest an incidence of contralateral inguinal hernia of 2.6%. We report laparoscopic repair of a canal of Nuck cyst and ipsilateral indirect inguinal hernia. A 41 year old female with a past surgical history of Cesarean section presented with a painful mass of the left labia majora that was increasing in size. Exam revealed a palpable mass that was more prominent upon standing. Ultrasound demonstrated a well-circumscribed, nonseptated, cystic, avascular mass. Hydrocele of the canal of Nuck and possible inguinal hernia was suspected. A laparoscopic approach was decided upon to allow diagnosis and treatment of inguinal hernia if present. Because of the previous Pfannenstiel incision, we opted for a transabdominal approach. A canal of Nuck cyst and ipsilateral indirect inguinal hernia were found without a contralateral defect. The hyrocele was excised and a transabdominal preperitoneal repair of the hernia performed. She recovered without incident. Pathology was consistent with a hydrocele. Hydrocele of the canal of Nuck is an uncommon occurrence. To our knowledge, laparoscopic repair has not previously been reported. We demonstrate that laparoscopy is a viable approach for treating a canal of Nuck hydrocele and offers the additional benefit of identifying and treating concomitant inguinal hernias. S74 P-11732 Outcome analysis in complex open ventral hernia repair with large pore low surface area polypropylene mesh in the retro-rectus and pre-peritoneal space Zabel D, Conway M, Kalish E, Belgrade J Christiana Care Health Systems Open ventral hernia (OVH) repairs have had historically high recurrence rates. The type of reinforcing material, the layer of reinforcement and the extent of mesh placement is debatable. We propose mesh placement from xiphoid to pubis. We present our outcome data of large OVH repair with component muscle separation (CMS) utilizing a large pore low surface area (LPLSA) polypropylene mesh in the pre-peritoneal or retrorectus placement. We retrospectively reviewed our prospectively maintained single institution data base of 208 consecutive patients. Patient demographics were identified and outcome variables including surgical site occurrences, length of hospital stay and hernia recurrence were evaluated. Patient follow-up of 6-42 months (mean 28), 144 females and 72 males, age 23-95 years (mean 56), with BMI 23-78 kg/m2 (mean 36), and hernia width 5-28 cm (mean 10) were evaluated. Ninety eight percent of patients had re-approximation of the rectus muscles in the midline utilizing an external oblique or transversalis component muscle release. Mesh was placed in the pre-peritoneal space in 164 patients (79%) and retro-rectus space in 44 (21%) patients. Sixty six surgical site occurrences (31%), including 5 mesh infections occurred which were successfully managed without mesh removal. Mean hospital stay was 9.4±6.2 days. One patient developed an enterocutaneous fistula and stayed in the hospital 121 days. Two hernia recurrences (1%) were noted, both under 6 months from time of operation. Larger reinforcement of the abdominal wall is appealing to prevent future hernia recurrence and we feel that reinforcement from xiphoid to pubis is helpful to minimize recurrence. LPLSA mesh can safely be placed in this space and infections may be treated without mesh removal. Patient satisfaction is acceptable. One sub-xiphoid recurrence and one flank recurrence were thought to be secondary to technical aspects of mesh anchoring. P-11928 Umbilical hernia. Implementation of a digital data base Rappoport J, Dominguez C, Carrasco J, Alban M, Silva J, Rappoport D, Salazar V, Bencina F, Palacios F Clinical Hospital, University of Chile Introduction: The implementation of a digital database, will optimize the evaluation of the treatment of this disease. Methods: We present a digital database, based on FileMaker Pro program, used in Hernia Unit, Department of Surgery, Clinic Hospital, University of Chile, which includes 46 variables. From January 2009 to June 2013, 1,799 patients have been entered into the database, of which 188 (10.45%), corresponding to umbilical hernias, 94 females (50%) and 94 male (50%). Mean age 54±13.6 years. Results: The average BMI was 24.76. Operative time 93 mins. (Range 20-220). Elective Surgery 168 (89%). Emergency 20 (11%). Two of them were presented as strangulated hernia, and required bowel resection. 107 presented a single ring deffect and 81 (53%) Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S50-S97 presented two or more defects. Mesh repair was performed in 169 cases, (90%) and simple repair in19 (10%), mainly in emergency cases. Open onlay mesh was performed in 111 patients (65.6%), preperitoneal or retromuscular in 42 cases (24.8%), and laparoscopic approach in 16 cases (8.5%). Drainage was used in 55 cases (29.2%). Hevy weight polypropylene mesh was implanted in 120 patients (71%), composite mesh for intraperitoneal position 16 (9.5%), light weight polypropylene in 16 (9.5%), polyester autoadhesive in 16 (9.5%), and absorbable polyglactin mesh in 1 case (0.59%). 124 patients, (66%), presented as primary hernia, 34% had one or more recidives. Postoperative morbidity occurred in 21 patients, 2 (1.06%) in elective and 19 (10.1%) in emergency. p <0.05. There was no mortality in this series. The average hospital stay was 3 days. Comment: The implementation of a digital record, will more accurately assess the results of treatment of umbilical hernias. Long term follow up, will let us to evaluate the real utility of the techniques described in this serie. P-12180 Mid-transverse epigastric perforator sparing skin flaps minimize wound morbidity in open ventral hernia repair Zabel D, Conway M, Kalish E, Belgrade J Christiana Care Health Systems Open ventral hernia (OVH) repair with component muscle separation (CMS) may devascularize the abdominal wall and lead to dehiscence, infection, fat necrosis and seroma formation. Numerous approaches to maintain blood supply to the abdominal wall have been proposed including an endoscopic muscle release, vertical incision with umbilical perforator sparing and lateral transversalis release without skin undermining. We present a transverse skin incision with epigastric perforating skin flaps for OVH repair that maintains skin blood supply and allows access for an external oblique CMS and placement of trans-muscular sutures. We retrospectively reviewed our prospectively maintained single institution data-base of OVH repair with CMS and placement of preperitoneal or retro-muscular polypropylene mesh with 13 consecutive patients with a transverse incisional epigastric perforator sparing approach to 13 consecutive previous patients with a traditional transverse incisional approach. Outcome data included seroma, fat necrosis, dehiscence, infection and return to operating room for wound complications. In the epigastric perforator sparing group, there was 1 (8%) seroma, 1 (8%) fat necrosis, 0 dehiscence and no return to the operating room as compared to the same incision with undermining there was 3 (23%) seromas, 2 (15%) fat necrosis, 2 (15%) dehiscences and 3 (23%)return to the operating room for wound complications. Total surgical site occurrences for the perforator sparing group was 2 (15%) vs 5 (38%) for the undermined group (p<0.05). No mesh was removed in either group. OVH repair techniques for abdominal wall reconstruction are important to minimizing recurrence rates. Surgical sight occurrences and surgical site infections have consistently been reported over 25%. Consensus opinions agree that preserving blood supply to the adipofascial-cutaneous flaps is important to minimizing wound complications. The perforator sparing mid-transverse incision shows promise for meeting these demands, and provides ease of anchoring with large mesh reinforcements. Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S50-S97 P-12208 Pure tissue repair with biological mesh. A ten-year follow-up Ravo B, Falasco G Rome American Hospital The aetiology of inguinal hernia (IH) is by multifactorial causes which remain after surgery The use of non biological meshes can be cause of infections, migration, adhesions, granulomas, fistula formation, erosions to adjacent organs, etc. Biological materials (BM) of various human and animal origin have been proposed for hernia surgery A study evaluating complications associated with the use of biological mesh for inguinal hernia surgery has started in 2003. Patients and methods: from April 2003 to June 2013. 104 IH have being repaired in 101 patients (pts), using a BM (Surgisis-Cook). There were 87 male (86%) and 14 female (13%) pts, with a mean age of 59.4 yrs. (range 19-89). Three male pts had bilateral IH, two male had incarcerated IH, 11 pts (10%) were on anticoagulants, 12 pts (11%) had recurrent IH. 80 pts (79%) had spinal anaesthesia, 21 pts (21%) had general anaesthesia. All received pre- and post-operative i.v. antibiotics. Surgical Technique:The BM is placed under the transversalis fascia. A tissue repair is carried out with a continuous suture of prolene, taking transversalis fascia to transversalis fascia. Results: In all IH (elective 90, emergency 2, recurrent 12) 33 indirect hernias, 39 direct and 32 direct+indirect. Follow-up ranges from 79 to 122 months, with a median of 8.4 yrs in 94% of pts. Recurrence 2/104 (1.9%) One in a patient with bilateral IH in the first week, in another pt at six yrs. Mortality 0. Dermal haematic infiltration to the scrotum 6, to the vulva 1, all resolved spontaneously. Mean recovery time was 1.2 days (range 1-5 days).Wound infection 0 Urinary retention 11/101 (11%). Inguinal scrotal hypoesthesia 7/101 (7%), which improved after 4 to 6 months. Fever (39°C) 2/101 (2%), which responded to single dose of 4 mg betametasone. Conclusions: The use of BM to reinforce IH tissue repair is safe and effective. P-12209 Femoral hernia, results and quality of life Carrasco J, Muñoz A, Dominquez M, Alban M, Rappoport J, Rappoport D, Norambuena M, Huerta C, Torres R Hospital Clinico Universidad de Chile Introduction: Femoral Hernia (FH) represent only 2 to 5% of hernia surgery and a high risk of strangulation. Emergency bowel resection is associated with 6 to 25% of mortality. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate demographic issues, surgical treatment and quality of life of FH patients. Materials and methods: Computed data base was used to register 46 variables, like age, sex, elective (ElS) or emergency surgery (EmS). and postoperative morbility. Quality of life was assessed with a telephonic follow up of a previous validated test T student was performed for statistical analysis and a p<0.05 was considered significative. Results: Since January 2002 to June 2013, 211 patients were included. 48 men (22.75%), female 163 (77.25%). Elective Surgery (ElS) was performed in 157 patients (74.41%) and emergency surgery (EmS) in 54 (29.9%). Mean age of 55.3 years for ElS and 72.8 years for EmS. p <0.007. Length of hospital stay, 2.37 days for ElS and 7.02 days for Ems. p<0.002. S75 Postoperatory morbility 3.82% EmS and 32.65% for Em. p< 0.0001 Postoperatory mortality 0% ElS and 3.7% Em. p<0.002. Quality of life assesed in 86 patients (37.9%) revealed: Excelent 44 patients (51.16%). Very good 20 (23.26%), good 13 (15.12%), bad 6 (6.98%) and very bad 3 (3.49%). Comments: FH had a low frequency but a high risk of emergency surgery. Mortality after bowel resection was 18.18% in this series. Female incidence is accord with other series. Mean age of emergency cases was 20 years older than elective cases, suggest that EmS was in patients with FH of longer evolution and efforts for early diagnosis and elective surgery may improve the results of surgical treatment in this pathology. P-12211 Management considerations in the contaminated abdominal wall Fernando I Hospital Universitario Austral The management of contaminated abdominal wall provides a complex challenge for any surgical team. the use of biological or not biological mesh is until controversial in this type of patient. We could find many options of management of the abdominal wall in the face of contamination, but in this opportunity we will discuss our way to achieve better outcomes in the complex patient. A suitable patient selection, management of nutritional state, control of local infection, antibiotic therapy, and the use of the adequated material in the correct place have allowed to take a stance to treat these patients. In our hospital, these type of patients are treated in a multidisciplinary way, endured a good nutritional status will allow to get better local control. The vacuum system is mandatory in these phase of treatment. Once, local infection has been under control, surgery have a protagonic place to solve these pathology in one step. First of all we begin the dirty time ensured a minimum dissection of the abdominal wall (infectious focal control with or without bowel resection) to continue with the second time where with a meticulous dissection of the abdominal wall, we can see where is the best place where we leave the mesh. It could be inlay (flexible composited mesh) or sublay if we can close the posterior wall, using the adequated mesh material (light macropourus mesh) S76 P-12212 “Sportsmans Hernia” – The difference between pubalgia and inguinal pain Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S50-S97 Conclusion: In conclusion, this study demonstrated that hernia surgery with with Gilbert Repair is associated with low rates of recurrence and chronic pain. The rate of satisfied patients is high. Koch A, Lorenz R Center for Hernia Surgery Recent publicity and some scientific reports suggest increasing success in treating an entity called “sports hernia” – more accurately named athletic pubalgia. The former concepts do not take into account the likely mechanisms of injury or various patterns of pain that these athletes exhibit. The author believes that the concept of a “pubic joint” or “pubic dynamic complex” is fundamental to understanding the anatomy and pertinent pathophysiology in these patients. Many injuries can now be treated successfully. Some of the injuries require surgery and others do not. We have to look for the Symphyseal bones and the entire anterior pelvic musculo-sceleton complex around these bones, this is the “dynamic pubic complex”. The Approach to to the right therapy is the understanding of this Complex. Most of the athlets can be cured by a conservative treatment some needs an anterior pelvic floor repair. The decision to an operative treatment is highly selective, in case of pubalgia the Revision of the inguinal canal is not enough. The first choice of treatment is conservative! The discrimination between inguinal pain and pubalgia is essential to find out the right strategy! Inguinal pain (bulging with nerve entrapment) ist the domain of operative treatment (minimal repair) In case of pubalgia anterior pelvic floor repair is the most effective method with the lowest recurrence rate if the conservative treatment fails. P-12215 Knotless tissue control device suture for minimally invasive closure of abdominal wall defects Ortiz-Ortiz C Florida Hospital Minimally invasive ventral hernia repairs has gained more acceptance during the past few years. Guidelines for hernia repairs has been described in order to minimize the risk of recurrence. Laparoscopic closure of Abdominal Wall defects is quite a challenge due to angles, size and intrabdominal pressure. Knotless tissue control device suture for laparoscopic and robotic closure of defects makes repairs more amenable and easier to performed in situations where closing the hernia defect and deploying the mesh is a real challenge. P-12216 Inicial brazilian experience using 3d mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair Morrell A, Cavazolla L, Malcher F, Furtado M, Meyer A, Farah F, Costas M Brazil P-12214 Gilbert repair for inguinal hernia – CCS Evaluation of more than 6,000 patients Koch A, Lorenz R, Wiese M, Born H, Cejnar S Center for Hernia Surgery Background: With the use of mesh shown to considerably reduce recurrence rates for hernia repair and the subsequent improvement in clinical outcomes, focus has now been placed on quality-of-life outcomes in patients undergoing these repairs, specifically, as they relate to the mesh prosthesis. In 2007 Heniford et al. propose a new quality-of-life survey, the Carolinas Comfort Scale (CCS), pertaining specifically to patients undergoing hernia repair with mesh. (J Am Coll Surg 2008; 206: 638-644. © 2008 by the American College of Surgeons) Methods: 35 ambulant hernia centers in Germany carry on a large multicenter study on hernia repair using the Gilbert Repair since the 1st of October, 2009. The CCS questionnaire was mailed to all patients 4 and 12 weeks after surgery. A clinical examination by the surgeon was also made 4 and 12 weeks postoperatively There are 3 main points in the questionnare: sensation of mesh, movement limitations and pain. For each point, 8 questions (eg. Laying down, bending over, sitting down, walking etc.) and for every question a maximum of 5 points is possible. Results: Between 1st of October 2009 and 31st of August 2013 in total 6.021 patients were enrolled (median age 54 years).The postoperative morbidity was 1.5% and the recurrence rate after 52 weeks was 0.4%. Inguinal chronic pain was found in 2.2% The patient satisfaction rate was 98%. The sum score for the satisfied patients is in correlation with the score published by Heniford in 2008. Background: Several surgical techniques have been developed over the past years, and total extraperitoneal (TEP) and transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (TAPP) are the endoscopic techniques that are most commonly used. The purposes of this study were to describe and discuss the modifications of using 3-D mesh in inguinal hernia repair. Methods: 169 patients who underwent an elective inguinal hernia repair at a five hospitals in Brazil (Professor Edmundo Vasconcelos Hospital, São Paulo; Albert Einstein Hospital, São Paulo; Soban Hospirtal, Jundiai; Anchieta Hospital, Fundação ABC, Santo André; Graffe Guinle Hospital, Rio de Janeiro) between May 2012 and July 2013 were enrolled prospectively in this study. Operative and postoperative course were studied. Results: A total of 225 hernia repairs were included in the study. The hernias were repaired by TEP and TAPP technique; Mean operative time was 32 min in unilateral hernia and 42 min in bilateral hernia. Most of the patients (95%) were discharged at the same day of the surgery. The overall postoperative morbidity rate was 0,1%. The incidence of recurrence rate was 0% in this short period. Conclusion: Endoscopic hernioplasty is a very effective and safe procedure in the hands of experienced surgeons with specific training. It is an interesting option in bliateral and recurrent hernia as it obtains satisfactory results in terms of postoperative pain and morbidity. Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S50-S97 P-12217 Subtotal colectomy and omentectomy for loss of domain in giant ventral hernias Ortiz-Ortiz C, Parra-Davila E, Diaz-Hernandez J, Amarante G, Rojas A Florida Hospital Complex Ventral Hernias with loss of domain are challenging cases for surgeons. Techniques like component Separation have been describe to allow medialization of the rectus muscle and stabilization of the abdominal wall. Giant Hernias with loss of domain precludes medialization of the abdominal wall even after component separation technique. Due to lack of space and high intrabdominal pressures, compartment syndrome is a threathening complicaton. Techniques to allow closure while preventing compartment syndrome includes omentectomy and bowel resection. A series of 25 subtotal colectomies with omentectomies have been done in the last 3 years. Complications including recurrence, mesh infection, wound infetion, anastomotic leaks and bowel obstructions where consider. P-12218 Outcome of abdominal wall hernia repair with biologic mesh: Permacol vs Strattice Cheng A, Abbas M, Tejirian T Kaiser Permanente, Los Angeles Medical Center The use of biologic mesh in abdominal wall operations has gained popularity despite a paucity of outcome data. Numerous biologic products are available with virtually no clinical comparison studies. We reviewed and compared the experience of a large healthcare organization with Permacol™ and Strattice™ biologic mesh. A retrospective study was conducted of patients who underwent abdominal wall hernia repair with Permacol™ (cross-linked porcine dermis) and Strattice™ (non-cross-linked porcine dermis) in 14 Southern California hospitals. 270 patient charts were analyzed; 195 Permacol™ and 75 Strattice™. Operations included ventral/incisional, parastomal, and inguinal hernia repairs. Short-term complications including infection, seroma, hematoma, and dehiscence were statistically less in the Strattice™ group compared to the Permacol™ group (13% vs 38%, p<0.05). In Permacol™ patients complication rates were significantly higher in patients with infected versus clean wounds, BMI>40 kg/m2 versus BMI<40 kg/m2, and in patients with prior mesh repair. These were not seen in the Strattice™ group. Both mesh groups had significantly higher short-term complication and recurrence rates when mesh was used as a fascial bridge (51% Permacol™, 58% Strattice™). Overall hernia recurrence was not different between the two groups. In patients with a history of prior mesh repair, recurrence rates were significantly higher in those who subsequently underwent Strattice™ repair (50%) versus Permacol™ repair (19.7%) with a mean follow up of 1.6 years for Strattice™ and 2.1 years for Permacol™. To date, this is the largest study comparing two types of commonly used biologic products in abdominal wall hernia repair. In our patient population undergoing heterogeneous operations, the Strattice™ group has lower short-term complications compared to Permacol™. However, there was a higher rate of recurrence for Strattice™ in patients with a prior history of mesh repair. The cross-linked nature of the mesh material might be contributing to the difference of outcomes with these biologic products. S77 P-12219 Outcomes analysis of biologic mesh use for abdominal wall reconstruction in clean-contaminated and contaminated ventral hernia repair Kwon E, Piper M, Sbitany H University of California San Francisco Background: Repair of grade 3 and grade 4 ventral hernias is a distinct challenge, given the potential for infection, and the comorbid nature of the patient population. This study evaluates our institutional outcomes when performing single-stage repair of these hernias, with biologic mesh for abdominal wall reinforcement. Methods: A prospectively maintained database was reviewed for all patients undergoing repair of grade 3 (potentially contaminated) or grade 4 (infected) hernias, as classified by the Ventral Hernia Working Group. All those patients undergoing repair with component separation techniques and biologic mesh reinforcement were included. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and postoperative complications were analyzed. Univariate analysis was performed to define factors predictive of hernia recurrence and wound complications. Results: A total of 41 patients underwent single-stage repair of grade 3 and grade 4 hernias over a 4-year period. The overall postoperative wound infection rate was 15%, and hernia recurrence rate was 12%. Almost all recurrences were seen in grade 4 hernia repairs, and in those patients undergoing bridging repair of the hernia. One patient required removal of the biologic mesh. Those factors predicting hernia recurrence were smoking (p=0.023), increasing BMI (p=0.012), increasing defect size (p=0.010), and bridging repair (p=0.042). No mesh was removed due to perioperative infection. Conclusion: Single-stage repair of grade 3 hernias performed with component separation and biologic mesh reinforcement is effective and offers a low recurrence rate. Furthermore, the use of biologic mesh allows for avoidance of mesh explantation in instances of wound breakdown or infection. Bridging repairs are associated with a high recurrence rate, as is single-stage repair of grade 4 hernias. S78 P-12220 Permissive abdominal hypertension following open incisional hernia repair: a novel concept Petro C, Raigani S, Orenstein S, Klick J, Rowbottom J, Novitsky Y, Rosen M University Hospitals Case Medical Center Introduction: Intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH, >12 mmHg) leading to abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS, >20 mmHg with associated organ dysfuction) can indicate the need for a decompressive laparotomy. However, the physiology and sequelae of primary IAH/ACS following abdominal wall reconstruction are unknown. Methods: Bladder pressure (BP) and plateau pressure (PP) were measured before incision and immediately after fascial closure for patients undergoing complex open ventral hernia repairs at Case Medical Center. Measurements were obtained again on post-operative day (POD)1 and 2 if a bladder catheter remained or the patient remained intubated. Outcome measures were changes in BP and PP. Secondary outcomes were incidence of end organ dysfunction such as respiratory events or acute kidney injury (AKI). Results: Four men and ten women with an average age of 60 and body mass index of 33.4 kg/m2 undergoing open repair of incisional hernias with an average hernia width of 13.2 cm were followed prospectively. Mean increase in PP after repair was 3 (range -2 to 7) cmH2O. Mean BP was 13 (range 7-21) mmHg preoperatively and 20.4 (12-34) mmHg postoperatively, with 8/14 patients measuring >20 mmHg following closure. Only one patient remained intubated post procedure (PP 17->27, BP 11->24) and these values decreased by the following morning at which time she was extubated (PP 24, BP 12). All remaining patients were extubated postoperatively and did not require reintubation (mean BP 20.1) BP decreased in 12/14 patients on POD1 with an average value of 15.1mmHg (range 1-11). In the 2/14 instances where BP increased on POD1, one patient was nauseated and vomiting, the other was having significant pain. Conclusion: Primary IAH and potentially ACS is a predictable outcome following abdominal wall reconstruction. Marked improvement by POD1 can be expected and is likely attributed to musculofascial releases that allow the abdominal wall to expand allowing physiologic compensation for the intra-abdominal hypertension. P-12221 Outcome analysis of light weight large pore polypropylene mesh in complex open ventral hernia in clean contaminated and contaminated fields Zabel D, Conway M, Kalish E, Belgrade J Christiana Care Health Systems There is no consensus for a reinforcing mesh material in complicated open ventral hernia (OVH) repair. Use of synthetic mesh in clean contaminated and contaminated fields has not been routinely recommended because of poor infection resistance. Recent studies have suggested that open ventral hernia repairs utilizing bio-prosthetic mesh in clean contaminated and contaminated fields may have hernia recurrence rates of more than 30%. The use of light weight, large pore (LWLP) polypropylene mesh may be considered an alternative to bio-prosthetic mesh. We aimed to analyze the outcome of implanting LWLP mesh in the pre-peritoneal space for OVH repairs in clean contaminated and contaminated fields. Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S50-S97 We retrospectively examined our single institution hernia center data base. Patients with OVH repair and component muscle separation with at least 1,500 cm2 of LWLP polypropylene mesh in the preperitoneal space that were clean contaminated and contaminated were included. Outcome parameters included length of hospital stay, surgical site occurrence, mesh removal, and hernia recurrence. 68 patients (28 male, 40 female) with a mean age of 60±14 years and a body mass index (BMI) of 38±14 kg/m2 were evaluated. There were 40 clean contaminated and 28 contaminated patients. Mean hospital stay was 7±4 and 9±11 days respectively. There were a total of 29 (42%) surgical site occurrences in the 30 day post-operative period for the clean contaminated group and 12 (33%) for the contaminated group. No mesh removal and no hernia recurrences were noted during the follow up of 32±12 months for both groups. Interestingly, BMI was more predictive of surgical site occurrence than mesh placement in a contaminated field, p<0.05. Early analysis of LWLP polypropylene mesh is favorable. The cost of bio-prosthetic mesh may not justify its use when compared to LWLP synthetic mesh in OVH repair with CMS if further data support an acceptable risk profile. P-12222 Initial experience of TEP technique without fixation in Sao Paulo, Brazil Meyer A USP Background: Several surgical techniques have been developed over the past years, and total extraperitoneal and transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair are the endoscopic techniques that are most commonly used. The purposes of this study were to describe and discuss the initial experience of TEP technique (total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair) without fixation in São Paulo, Brazil. Methods: Patients who underwent an elective inguinal hernia repair were enrolled prospectively in this study. Operative and postoperative course were studied. Results: Between May 2009 and May 2013 a total of 381 hernia repairs were included in the study. The hernias were repaired by total extraperitoneal technique; three hernias (0.7%) were converted to open anterior Liechtenstein technique. Mean operative time was 36.2 min in unilateral hernia and 45.36 min in bilateral hernia. Most of the patients (96%) were discharged at the same day of the surgery. The overall postoperative morbidity rate was 4.8%. The incidence of recurrence rate was 0.0% in this short period. Conclusion: Total extraperitoneal hernioplasty is a very effective and safe procedure in the hands of experienced surgeons with specific training. It is an interesting option in bilateral and recurrent hernia as it obtains satisfactory results in terms of postoperative pain and morbidity. Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S50-S97 P-12223 The use of bioresorbable polymer mesh in open inguinal hernia repair reduces post-operative pain and dysfunction: A pilot investigation. Rose B, Morfesis A Owen Drive Surgical Clinic of Fayetteville Introduction: Currently, the use of bioresorbable polymers in mesh for open inguinal hernia repair is not completely understood. To date, four such products exist, all with variable rates of degradation in vivo. Here we report on the long-term efficacy of a lightweight, polyester plug mesh with 50% degradation at 6 months. Methods: A prospective cohort was designed and IRB approval was granted. Patients were offered plug-and-patch repair for their hernias. They were asked at the time of consultation to complete a pain and quality of life survey. This assessment was again given at 1 month and 3 months post-repair. The survey consisted of questions related to physical activity (lying down, bending, coughing, standing, sitting, walking flat, and walking on a slope), work-relatedness of their hernia, and patient satisfaction of the repair. The Covidien Parietex plugand-patch hernia system was selected for repair. This mesh is composed of 50% Poly-L-Lactic acid which is resorbed in vivo 6 months after implantation. Results: A total of n=26 patients were repaired. 10/26 had an RIH, 10/26 had an LIH, and 6/26 had bilateral inguinal hernias. The mean age was 55.4 years (26-78) with a mean body weight of 198 pounds (138-291). At pre-operative evaluation, 17/26 indicated they had at least one significant physical limitation. At 1 month post-repair 6/26 indicated they had at least one significant physical limitation. And finally, at 3 months post-repair, 2/26 indicated significant physical limitation. The were no wound seromas or recurrences. Only 2/26 participants reported persistent chronic groin pain at 3 months. With the exception of one participant, 25/26 reported that they were either “satisfied” or “very satisfied” with the outcome of their hernia repair. Conclusion: This brief pilot investigation demonstrates that the use of a PLLA-lightweigh polyester mesh for open inguinal hernia repair is a suitable option. P-12224 Revision of failed transoral incisionless fundoplication by subsequent laparoscopic nissen fundoplication Ashfaq A, Harold K Mayo Clinic, Arizona Background: Transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF) is a new endoscopic approach for treating gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). In cases of TIF failure, subsequent laparoscopic fundoplication may be required. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and outcomes of laparoscopic nissen fundoplication after failed TIF. Methods: All patients from 2010 to 2013 who had persistence and objective evidence of recurrent gastroesophageal reflux after TIF underwent laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. Primary outcome measures included operative time, blood loss, length of hospital stay and complications encountered. Results: A total of 5 patients underwent revisional laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for recurrent GERD at a median interval of 24 months (range, 16-30) after TIF. Patients had recurrent reflux symptoms at an average of 1 month following TIF (range, 1-9 months). Average operative time for revisional fundoplication was S79 94 minutes (range, 65-240) and all surgeries were performed with a minimal blood loss (<30 ml). There were no cases of gastric or esophageal perforation. Three patients had additional finding of a significant hiatal hernia that was fixed simultaneously. Median length of hospitalization was 2 days (range, 1-3 days). All patients had resolution of symptoms at the last follow up. Conclusion: Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication is a feasible and safe option in a patient who has persistent GERD after a TIF. Previous TIF did not result in additional operative morbidity. P-12225 Utilization of biologic mesh materials in repair of incisional hernias among peritoneal dialysis patients: The comparison of crosslinked versus non-cross linked porcine dermis scaffolds Rose B, Morfesis A Owen Drive Surgical Clinic of Fayetteville Introduction: The use of mesh in ventral/incisional hernia repair has been well described. Currently, there are a number of mesh materials available for implantation, including those that are purely synthetic, partially biodegradable, full biodegradable, and biologic scaffold. The later lacks widespread consensus among its exclusive utilization in complex, often contaminated abdominal scenarios. Our group has found that using biologic materials to repair ventral/incisional hernias among peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients allows for optimum outcomes. It is well known that PD patients have higher intraabdominal wall pressures, thus putting them at higher risk for the development of abdominal wall hernias at prior incision sites. This abstract seeks to explore our institution’s experience with several biologic mesh products used in PD patients. Methods: PD patients who presented with a primary or incisional (trocar site) defect were offered elective open repair using a biologic graft. The biologic grafts utilized include Strattice (acellular porcine dermis), Permacol (cross-linked porcine dermis), and XenMatrix (non cross-linked porcine dermis). Upon repair of the abdominal wall defect, patients were placed on hemodialysis for variable periods. Retrospective chart review was then conducted to assess for pertinent clinical predictors and outcomes at follow up. Results: n=2 patients underwent repair with acellular procine dermis, both of which returning to peritoneal dialysis post-repair. n=1 patients underwent repair using a heavily cross-linked porcine dermis without complication and also was able to resume peritoneal dialysis readily. Lastly, n=1 patient underwent repair utilizing a moderately crosslinked porcine dermis and developed an enterocutaneous fistula (EC), however this only required minimal operative repair and bowel rest, not explantation of the allograft. Conclusions: We report this small, long-term case series in efforts to understand the efficacy of biologic mesh in treating abdominal wall hernias in PD patients. We believe this is the preferred method to be applied widely among surgeons. S80 P-12226 Utilizing innovative analysis methods to define and measure optimal technique for fascial closure Soto-Edwards A, Ursu D, Suchoski J, Russomanno A, Kasten S, Gillespie B, Minter R University of Michigan Department of Surgery Introduction: Incisional hernia is the most common complication in general surgery with an estimated cost of $2.5 billion/year (USA). Validated standards support a running suture closure of 5-10mm bites and 5-10mm travel between bites. Despite these established metrics, there are few if any simulators for teaching abdominal fascial closure. Methods: A surgical simulator and iPhone application were developed to allow trainees to perform a 3-D laparotomy closure on artificial human abdominal fascia [AHAF] utilizing standard surgical equipment and to receive feedback on their performance. The app uses a photo of their final closure with a client-server architecture and computer image-processing algorithm to measure the geometries of their sutures, and longitudinally tracks their performance. Trainee’s closure attempts are measured against expert surgeons’ closures performed on pre-marked AHAF with 0.5 and 1 cm bites and travel suture entry points defined. Results: Utilizing porcine and cadaver laboratory studies of fascia, along with published experimental data, and the Cambridge Engineering Selector, AHAF was designed with a neoprene polymer. This allowed for simulator properties of similar feel on suturing, size of gap after incision, and force required to pull cut edges to midline as human fascia. After a closure is performed, the algorithm identifies the incision, pixel/distance ratio, and stores suture properties to a database. Feedback via the iPhone application from quantitative values such as stitch count, travel, and bite-size, in reference to the expert closures instructs students in modifying their technique (e.g. take smaller bites or travel more). Conclusions: This mobile surgical simulator for fascial closure will allow trainees to train to automaticity utilizing clinically established optimal technique on a realistic 3-D laparotomy model prior to performing fascial closure in patients. Prospective trials are needed to determine if this training will translate into decreased incisional hernia rates. P-12227 Totally Laparoscopic management of acute hernia with prosthetic mesh Hernandez M, Franklin M, Romo Z, Castillo G Texas Endosurgery Institute Background: The indications for minimal access surgery in the emergency situations have been expanded in the last decade. The laparoscopic treatment of acutely incarcerated or strangulated hernia is uncommon and still controversial either inguinal, incisional or any type of hernia. Recent development of new biologic materials and technologies in laparoscopy has led to improved results. This approach allows hernia correction and treatment of the hernia content leading to swift patient recovery and discharge. Methods: A prospective database of consecutive series of patients with any type of acute hernia who underwent laparoscopic repair with mesh placement was identified. We collected the results of patients admitted between January 2007 and August 2013. Demographic characteristics, mode of presentation, type of hernia, intraoperative findings, postoperative course and complications were analyzed. Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S50-S97 We practice closure of large defects with nonabsorbable suture, even if only a limited closure is possible. In our practice, this is usually accomplished percutaneously, as individual sutures. Any incarceration was reduced and a prosthetic material was used to reinforce the defect closure. Results: A total of 644 patients with emergency hernia were analyzed [Female: 271 (42.1%), Male: 373 (57.9%), the preoperative morbidity heart disease 7%, COPD: 3.95%, diabetes: 6%, obesity: 11%, all patients underwent emergent laparoscopic procedure for inguinal/femoral hernia 54%, ventral hernia 20%, incisional hernia 26%, the acute hernia were complicated by incarcerated omentum 64%, incarcerated bowel 16%, strangulated bowel 20%. The rate of bowel resection was 7% and a conversion rate 2.4%. Conclusions: The emergency treatment for acutely incarcerated hernia is increasingly tackled using laparoscopic approach and it can be used without hesitation. The minimal access surgery has a lower recurrence rates, is associated with a less physiological insult, quicker recovery, and has a shorter hospital stay, lower postoperative complications such as infections, hernias, and scarring compared with open techniques. P-12229 Initial outcomes with an absorbable fixation device for mesh fixation Doerhoff C, Bringman S, Bringman J, Hammond J, Romanowski C, Jones P SurgiCare of Missouri Surgeons utilize different methods of mesh fixation including sutures, mechanical fixation devices, tackers and combinations thereof. An absorbable fixation device, consisting of polydioxanone and L (-)lactide/glycolide copolymer, was developed for mesh fixation during hernia repairs. Here we report initial outcomes related to pain and limitation of movement. Methods and procedures: The International Hernia Mesh Registry, a prospective international multi-center registry, collects longitudinal data on hernia mesh products including fixation methods. Data collection includes baseline characteristics, peri-operative details and complications. Patients complete the Carolinas Comfort Scale™, a quality of life questionnaire specific to herniorrhaphy, at baseline and intervals post-operatively up to 12 months. Symptomatic is defined as a score > 1 for at least one question. The database was analyzed to include all patients who received absorbable fixation device straps (Ethicon Securestrap™ Absorbable Fixation Device, Ethicon, Somerville, NJ) during hernia mesh repair. Results: Data on 115 patients across 13 centers with 1, 6 and 12 month data on 60, 34 and 33 patients, respectively was available. Mean age and Mean BMI were 54.7 years (13.8SD) and 33.7 (15.9SD). Overall hernia types/characteristics were; 83 incisional/ventral; 18 umbilical; 7 trocar and 7 epigastric; 92 primary/initial repairs and 112 laparoscopic repairs. Overall fixation methods (n): tackers only (42); tackers and sutures (71); tackers, sutures and fibrin sealant (2). Symptomatic patients with pain and movement limitations improved from baseline to 12 months (pain 71.8% to 31.3%; movement limitation 59.2% to 19.4%). Most common adverse events reported were 8 (7.0%) seromas and 3 (2.6%) urinary retentions. 6 (5.2%) patients had self-reported recurrences (though have not been medically confirmed). Conclusions: These results provide data on the use of Securestrap™ fixation device across a variety of different hernia surgeries. By 12 months, pain and movement limitations improved compared to baseline. Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S50-S97 P-12234 Long acting local anesthesia – will it have an impact on the practice of surgery? Young J, Gilbert A Hernia Institute of florida The selection of anesthetic technique for all surgical procedures is based on the requirements for the specific procedure, and the personal preference of the surgeon and anesthesiologist. Multimodal anesthesia, which combines the use of general, spinal, or regional anesthesia with local anesthetic infiltration by the surgeon, has been increasing in popularity. The control of pain in the post-operative period has been classically done with opioids, but anti-inflammatories given in the operating room and after surgery have become a part of the armentarium of the surgical-anesthesia team. This may have some prolonged effect beyond the period where local injection of bupivacaine helps to control pain. Up until recently, there has been no effective long acting injectable local anesthetic preparation to extend pain control through this post-operative period. Bupivacaine liposomal injectable solution - depo-bupivacaine (Pacira Pharmaceuticals Inc, Parsippany, NJ) is a newly FDA approved injectable preparation of bupivacaine encapsulated in lipid particles which allows for extended release of the anesthetic. The product has been used successfully for post-operative pain control after several different types of surgical procedures, both for in-patients and outpatients. There is evidence that pain after surgical procedures may lead to over-use of opioids, which can have serious consequences in the immediate post-operative period including adverse events that lead to prolonged hospital stay and increased costs. Prolonged postoperative pain can lead to increased opioid usage and even addiction, as well as an increased risk for chronic pan. A review of the pharmacology, safety and efficacy of injectable liposomal bupivacaine will be presented. An up-to-date summary of the methodology for injection for different procedures, including inguinal, umbilical and incisional hernias, will be described. This new product has the potential to change the way surgeons from all disciplines help patients to control post-operative pain. P-12235 A national evaluation of laparoscopic versus open ventral hernia repair in the cirrhotic patient Wormer B, Colavita P, Bradley J, Williams K, Walters A, Heniford B, Augenstein V Carolinas Medical Center Introduction: Ventral hernias commonly arise in the cirrhotic patient and have poor outcomes when they are repaired in the emergent setting; however few studies have evaluated the outcomes in laparoscopic versus open repair. The objective of this study was to perform a national analysis of the outcomes of laparoscopic (LVHR) versus open ventral hernia repair (OVHR) in cirrhotic patients in the elective and non-elective settings. Methods: The National Inpatient Sample, which captures approximately 20% of all US inpatient admissions, was queried for adults undergoing elective and non-elective LVHR or OVHR from 1/200912/2010 using ICD-9-CM coding. Patients were grouped based on a diagnosis of cirrhosis, with (PORT) or without (CIRR) signs of portal hypertension (ascites, varices, or encephalopathy). Standard statistical methods were used. S81 Results: During the study period, 25,368 patients underwent OVHR, 150 (0.6%) had CIRR and 123 (0.5%) had PORT. 9,419 patients underwent LVHR, 49 (0.5%) had CIRR and 27 (0.3%) had PORT. CIRR and PORT had equal rates of incarcerated hernias undergoing LVHR and OVHR, along with no difference in gender, race, or Charlson Comorbidity Index. In CIRR, admissions were more commonly elective in LVHR vs OVHR (87.8% vs 63.3%; p<0.05). Length of stay was shorter in CIRR undergoing LVHR vs OVHR (4.1±4.4 vs 5.1±4.5 days; p<0.05). For CIRR and PORT, there was no difference in postoperative wound infection or mortality between OVHR and LVHR (p>0.05). Mortality was higher for PORT vs CIRR for OVHR (9.76% vs 1.33%; p<0.05), but not LVHR (7.41% vs 2.04%; p>0.05). Despite repair type, mortality was higher in nonelective vs elective setting in PORT (14.3% vs 3.0%; p<0.05) and all cirrhotics (9.7% vs 1.5%; p<0.05). Conclusion: Severity of liver disease influences mortality more in OVHR than in LVHR, which is associated with decreased LOS in CIRR patients. Elective VHR should be considered in cirrhotic patients to improve mortality regardless of the repair type. P-12483 Glue for mesh fixation in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. An experimental comparison with conventional fixation. Reynvoet E, Cleven S, Vanlander A, Van Overbeke I, Troisi R, Berrevoet F University of Ghent, Department of General and Hepatobiliairy Surgery Introduction: The use of glue for mesh fixation in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair is gaining popularity as it is atraumatic to the peritoneum and results in less postoperative pain compared to penetrating fixation. Methods: A total of 21 sheep were operated using a hernia model with two fascial defects of 2 cm2 at the linea alba. One week later two polypropylene meshes (Dynamesh®) were implanted laparoscopically, using cyanoacrylate glue (Ifabond®) or conventional fixation (Securestrap®). In half of the animals the fascial defect was closed before mesh placement. After 1 day (n=6), 2 weeks (n=8) and 6 months (n=6) a second laparoscopy was performed at which hernia recurrence, mesh integration and adhesion formation were evaluated. After euthanasia, meshes and abdominal wall were excised to perform burst strength testing and to prepare samples for histopathological evaluation. Results: One animal died because of intestinal incarceration and was not used in the analysis. No recurrences were diagnosed in all 20 animals. Mesh placement was satisfying with good incorporation in both groups. Adhesions could hardly be observed after one day but were omnipresent at two weeks and six months. No significant difference in adhesion formation was seen between straps and glue. Burst strength testing exceeded 100N in all samples, independent of the fixation device used. Not after 1 day, but after 2 weeks the inflammatory cell response was significantly higher in the glue group. Foreign body reaction (FBR) was most pronounced at two weeks but no difference was seen between both fixation groups. Discussion: Using a standardized biomechanical testing system, synthetic glue can be considered an effective fixation in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair for relatively small mesh sizes. The possible tissue toxicity of cyanoacrylates does not lead to an increased FBR. No difference in burst strength was observed for closing or not closing the defect. S82 P-12484 Recycling the selfexpandable mesh in the laparoscopic repair of small ventral hernias: a series of 25 consecutive patients Reynvoet E, Cauwenberge S, Van Der Fraenen D, Feryn T, Dillemans B AZ Sint Jan Introduction: Nowadays the use of a mesh is mandatory, even for small ventral hernias. To avoid wide tissue dissection for this small defects, selfexpandable patches for intraperitoneal placement were launched on the market. However, recent reports describe failure of this technique as this implies blind placement and good deployment cannot be controlled. We present an adapted approach, using these patches in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Methods: This is a retrospective review of all patients in which a selfexpandable mesh was used to repair small ventral hernia. It concerns a polypropylene mesh with an ePTFE layer and a polyethylene terephthalate (PET) polymer ring as memory system, developed for open intraperitoneal placement. In our series the patch was placed laparoscopically over the fascial defect and fixed with resorbable tacks. A standardized technique was performed in all cases. Results: A series of 35 patients was operated from July 2011 to August 2013. In 10 cases, the mesh was placed by open repair. Of the 25 hernias treated laparoscopically, 12 were incisional hernias, 12 were primary ventral hernias and one Spighelian hernia. There were no conversions. The mean operative time was 59.26 min. and hospital stay was 2.9 days. Postoperative follow-up was complete for 18 patients (72%) with a mean follow-up of 19.7 months. Early postoperative complications consist of 5 seromas, all resolved spontaneously. Wound infection rate was zero. At long-term, no recurrences were seen. Mean VAS score is 1.18/10 at long-term. Three patients (12%) describe discomfort while bending and moving with foreign body sensation. Discussion: Laparoscopic placement of selfexpandable patches guarantees excellent visualization and correct mesh deployment. This approach should be considered as a valid alternative for the open technique in small ventral hernia repair. P-12486 Mayo health system analysis of endoscopic inguinal hernia repair mesh fixation AlJamal Y, Farley D, Paley K Mayo Clinic Background: While endoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (TEP IHR) offers favorable advantages over conventional repair, the need for general anesthesia and increased possibility of urinary retention may be troublesome. Urinary retention and subsequent overnight hospitalization frustrate hernia surgeons and their patients. Some mesh fixation options may lead to less pain, decrease use of narcotics and infrequent urinary retention. Methods: This retrospective study compares TEP-IHR within the Mayo Health System. While anesthesia, fluid management, and operative technique was consistent, fixation of mesh by titanium tacking clips (Rochester =21 surgeons) or glue (Owatonna = 3 surgeons) was varied. Results: A total of 1944 patients underwent a TEP-IHR: 343 patients (508 repairs) in Owatonna (O) and 1601 patients (2409 repairs) in Rochester (R). Patient demographics were similar between groups: median patient age (O=52, R=56), mean ASA (O=1.9, R=1.8), mean Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S50-S97 BMI (O=28, R=27), etc. Operative times were similar (O=84 min, R=87 min). The rate of intraoperative issues (peritoneal tear, bladder injury, conversion to open, etc) was increased for O compared to R (p<0.05). Among numerous postoperative variables assessed, Groups O and R differed for urinary retention (2% vs 10%, p<0.05), postoperative pain (0.8% vs 1.6%, p<0.05), and need for hospital admission (6% vs 20%, p<0.05). Conclusion: Patients undergoing endoscopic inguinal hernioplasty using glue fixation of mesh had less urinary retention and less need for overnight hospitalization. P-12487 Laparoscopic repair of traumatic diaphragmatic hernia Alaedeen D, Raj N Cleveland Clinic Introduction: Diaphragmatic rupture is a rare but serious complication of blunt thoracoabdominal trauma. Pulmonary or intestinal symptoms may aid in identifying the diagnosis and further aided by imaging studies. Methods: We present a case of a 56-year-old man with epilepsy who had sustained multiple falls presenting with an incarcerated traumatic diaphragmatic hernia. Case: At the time of laparoscopy the entire stomach, as well as the superior aspect of the spleen was seen herniating through the defect, which measured approximately 12 cm in length. The contents were reduced laparoscopically. The diaphragmatic defect was repaired using a running # 1 polyester suture and a left thoracostomy tube was placed. An intraoperative EGD showed a bezoar in the stomach with slight superficial ulcerations likely secondary to the gastric incarceration. Post operatively, he was managed on the regular nursing floor. The chest tube was removed post-operative day 2. He was tolerating a regular diet by post-perative day 3, and was discharged from the hospital on postoperative day seven. Summary: The surgical approach for repair of a diaphragmatic injury can be either through the chest or abdomen. In the acute setting, an abdominal approach is preferred as this allows examination of other abdominal contents that are at risk of injury. In the chronic setting, a combined approach should be entertained, as the surgeon should anticipate extensive adhesions. In this case report, we present a minimally invasive approach to a acute diaphragmatic injury. The laparoscope served as a diagnostic modality to evaluate for other abdominal injuries as well as reduction of the contents and repair of the hernia. The defect was repaired primarily using running sutures. The patient did well in the immediate postoperative period. In stable patients, the laparoscopic approach is safe and provides the advantages of minimal trauma, earlier recovery, and decreased hospital stay. Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S50-S97 P-12489 The use of porcine small intestinal submucosa surgisisr now as biodesigntm as prosthetic material in abdominal laparoscopic hernia repair: long-term follow-up at Texas Endosurgery Institute Hernandez M Texas Endosurgery Institute Introduction: Since their introduction in 1995, acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) have been preferable over synthetic mesh because they incorporate into host tissue and are relatively resistant to infection. In the event of incarcerated/strangulated hernias and other potentially contaminated fields, the placement of prosthetic material remains controversial because of increased risk of recurrence and infection. Porcine small intestine submucosa mesh (Biodesign by Cook) has been demonstrated safe and feasible in laparoscopic hernia repairs in this scenario. We present our 13 year experience, with placement of Biodesign mesh in potentially or grossly contaminated fields. Methods: From May 2000 to June 2013, 304 patients (187 male, 117 female) with 344 procedures were performed. Placement of Biodesign for either incisional, umbilical, inguinal, femoral or parastomal hernia repair in an infected or potentially contaminated setting were achieved and studied in a prospective fashion. Results: All procedures were done laparoscopically. Mean Follow up was 120 +/- 28.2 months. 233 procedures were performed concurrently with a contaminated procedure. 132 incarcerated hernias, 34 required small intestinal resection; 55 were left inguinal hernia, 83 right inguinal hernia, 81 incisional hernia, 65 umbilical hernia, 17 femoral hernia, 43 multiple defects, 27 seromas (all resolved), 17 recurrences, 34 patients report mild pain and two wound infection. Conclusion: In our experience the use of Biodesign small intestine submucosa mesh in contaminated or potentially contaminated fields is a safe and feasible alternative to hernia repair with minimal recurrence rate and satisfactory results in long-term follow up. P-12490 Seroma after IPOM hernia repair of giant incisional hernias Szura M, Solecki R, Matyja A, Kulig J Jagiellonian University Incisional hernias after open surgical procedures occur in several percent of operated patients. Most common causes include wound infection, obesity, earlier operations, coexisting diseases, immunosuppresion, and age. One of the treatment methods used to treat incisional hernia is laparoscopic implantation of intraperitoneal onlay mesh to close hernia gate and enhance abdominal wall. Seroma is frequently observed complication of hernia mesh implantation. It is either asymptomatic or may suggest hernia recurrence. Seromas are localized between the implemented mesh and inner surface of abdominal wall. Ultrasonographic examination or CT are basic methods used to confirm these postoperative complications. The authors evaluated the association between hernia repair and the incidence of seromas after laparoscopic hernia repair of incisional hernias. Material and methods: One hundred fifty eight patients undergoing laparoscopic hernia repair of incisional hernias between 2008 and 2012 were evaluated retrospectively. A study group consisted of 82 women and 76 men, at the mean age of 59, 3 years. The average S83 surface of hernia gate was 193 cm2. Group I consisted of 75 patients in whom hernia sac was removed, and group II of 83 patients in whom hernia sac was left. In both groups mesh was fixed by transfascial sutures and tacks. Results: In group I, there were 6 asymptomatic and 3 symptomatic seromas. In group II there were 6 asymptomatic and 5 symptomatic seromas. The average diameter of asymptomatic seromas was 25 cm3, and 58 cm3 in case of symptomatic seromas. After three-months follow-up, asymptomatic seromas were detected in 3 patients of group I, and in 4 of group II. Conclusions: Removal of hernia sac during laparoscopic IPOM hernia repair of incisional hernias lowers the frequency of seromas in the early postoperative period. In the long-term observation time no associations were found between removal of hernia sac and frequency of residual seromas. P-12492 Laparoscopic vs open inguinal hernia repair in octogenarians: results of a prospective international study Kim M, Oommen B, Ross S, Bradley J, Lincourt A, Sing R, Augenstein V Department of Surgery, Division of GI and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center Introduction: With improvements in medical care, advanced age is less often a contraindication for elective surgery. Both laparoscopic and open approaches for repair of inguinal hernias are used for octogenarians, but little is known about the differences in post-operative outcomes or quality of life (QOL) by operative approach in this population. Methods: A prospective, international hernia database was queried for all patients age 80-90 years old that underwent inguinal hernia repair between 2007 and 2011. Laparoscopic (LIHR) and open (OIHR) approaches were compared for demographics, comorbidities, operative details and outcomes, including quality of life (QOL). Data were examined by standard statistical methods, with significance at p<0.05. Results: Of 116 cases, 32 LIHR and 84 OIHR were performed. Patients were 94% Caucasian, with no differences in gender. The LIHR group was slightly younger (82±2.5 vs 83±2.4 years; p=0.02), but groups were similar for major comorbidities. Preoperative QOL was similar for pain and movement limitation. LIHR had more bilateral repairs (31.3% vs 8.3%; p=0.006) and all were performed under general anesthesia; OIHR was divided between general (44.1%), spinal (26.2%) and local (29.8%) anesthesia. LIHR were 68.8% transabdominal preperitoneal and 28.1% totally extraperitoneal. Mean OR time, inpatient stay, postoperative urinary complications and hematoma rates were similar between groups (all p>0.05). There were no infections, DVT, cardiac issues, reoperation or recurrence in either group. A subanalysis of OIHR by anesthesia type yielded similar patient characteristics and postoperative outcomes. No significant differences in pain, activity restriction or mesh sensation were present for follow-up at 1, 6, 12 or 24-month follow-up; p>0.05. Conclusion: LIHR and OIHR have similar safety, surgical and QOL outcomes in patients with advanced age. Octogenarians should not be excluded from consideration of a minimally invasive repair. S84 P-12494 Hernia is a mechanical disease Nicolo E Jefferson Regional Medical Center Modern authors are attaching more and more importance to the Transversalis Fascia as the most solid element of resistance to the Intra-Abdominal Pressure. So it is common view today that inguinal hernia is not just a local disease, but a local manifestation of a systemic disorder of collagen metabolism affecting the Transversalis Fascia. This study aims to demonstrate the fact that the true barrier to resist the Intra-Abdominal Pressure is the contraction of the Internal Oblique Muscle. The resistance of the Transversalis Fascia, although fused with the posterior aspect of the aponeurosis of the Transversus Abdominis Muscle, is limited when non-protected by the contracted Internal Oblique Muscle. Inguinal hernia is therefore a mechanical disease, due to the insufficiency and failure of the Internal Oblique Muscle; the anomalies in collagen metabolism and changed ratio of collagen types are secondary to the mechanical influences, according to the Hooke’s Law of Physics. The Physiopathology of inguinal hernia, as a mechanical disease, is explained as follows: 1. Abnormal function of the Internal Oblique Muscle. 2. The Transversalis Fascia remains unprotected and so, vulnerable to the increase of the Intra-Abdominal Pressure. 3. It stretches, decompensate and finally gives up and breaks. 4. Hernia. Inguinal Hernia is a mechanical disease due to the insufficiency and failure of the Internal Oblique Muscle. The anomalies of the collagen metabolism, as well as the breaking down of the Transversalis, are events secondary only to mechanical influences. P-12495 Quality of life (QOL) outcomes among elderly hernia patients – Repair or wait? Hammond J, Romanowski C, Jones P, Lombard J Ethicon, Inc Introduction: The so-called “old-old” elderly population (age 80 plus) is the fastest growing demographic in the US. Inguinal herniorrhaphy in this population may have increased risks, however the potential benefits have not been fully characterized. The objective of this study is to evaluate hernia repair outcomes on QOL within an advanced elderly population. Methods and procedures: The International Hernia Mesh Registry, a prospective multi-center registry collects longitudinal data on hernia mesh products and fixation methods. Data collection includes baseline characteristics, peri-operative details and complications. Patients complete the Carolinas Comfort Scale™ (CCS), QOL questionnaire specific to herniorrhaphy at baseline and intervals postoperatively up to 24 months. The database was analyzed to include all patients > 80 years old (making up 4% of the Registry), with 12 month patient reported outcomes. P-values were obtained using McNemar test. Results: 127 patients from 20 centers in 8 countries, ranging in age from 80-95 years, were identified. 12 month data on 91 (71.7%) patients was available. Mean age; 82.9 (3.1SD); Mean BMI; 25.1 (3.6SD). Hernia types (n); 99 inguinal, 17 incisional/ventral; 8 umbilical; 1 trocar, 1 epigastric and 1 femoral. 109 were primary repairs; 98 patients underwent an open repair. Fixation methods included Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S50-S97 sutures only (87); tackers only (22); no fixation method (13); tackers and sutures (2); glue (1). 74.3% patients returned to normal daily activities by 1 month postoperatively. 52.0% reported symptomatic pain pre-operative; reduced to 2.5% still reporting pain at one year (p<0.001). Symptomatic limitation of movement improved from 40.7% at baseline to 6.5% at one year (p<0.001). Most common adverse events reported: 3.9% hematoma and 3.9% urinary retention. 3 patients (2.4%) reported recurrences (medically unconfirmed). Conclusions: These observational results show herniorrhaphy in octogenarians is safe and can significantly improve their QOL in lieu of watchful waiting. P-12496 The original operation of edoardo bassini for the radical cure of inguinal hernia Nicolo E Department of General SurgeryDepartment of General Surgery, Jefferson Regional Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA The original operation of Edoardo Bassini for the radical cure of inguinal hernia as intended and reported by the “Maestro” in his monograph (1889), is a milestone in the surgical literature (the socalled North America Bassini operation is an incomplete and simplified edition of the original one.) The obliquity and the length characterize the sphinceter and shutter mechanisms of the inguinal canal. They are lost in a patient with inguinal hernia. The obliquity and the length of the inguinal canal with their physicologic mechanisms are re-established reconstructioning the posterior wall, (reapproximating the triple layer – internal oblique muscle, transverses muscle and transversalis fascia – to the inguinal ligament) and the internal inguinal ring, using the original “filzetta” stitch; and reconstructing the anterior wall and the external inguinal ring. The original operation of Bassini is a valid and strong method for the radical cure of inguinal hernia as demonstrated by numerous reports and our won experience of recurrence rate of less than one percent. Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S50-S97 P-12497 Indirect inguinal hernia repair using the Ultrapro Plug and the “double slit” technique, our initial experience Haggerty S, Sobacki J NorthShore University Healthsystem For open inguinal hernia repair, flat mesh, Perfix ™ plug and patch, Kugal ™ patch, and Prolene Hernia System ™ offer low recurrence rates. However, there is growing concern about scar tissue, shrinkage and chronic pain associated with “heavy mesh”. Therefore, we began using the Ultrapro ™ Plug and Patch in 2007. This is a light weight, macroporous, partially absorbable mesh plug with a flat preperitoneal portion. We used a “double slit” technique where the onlay portion of the plug was slit and placed around the spermatic cord and sewn to the inguinal ligament medial to the internal ring. The patch was also slit and sewn around the spermatic cord to the inguinal ligament lateral to the internal ring. This is a retrospective study to verify this technique. Methods: Retrospective data was collected on male patients above the age of 18 who had repair of indirect inguinal hernia with Ultrapro™ mesh and the “double slit” technique between June 1, 2007 and December 30, 2012. Long term data was collected by office visit and examination by the attending surgeon. Results: A total of 24 patients qualified and consented to follow-up. The average hernia size was 1.9 cm and the Large Ultrapro plug was used in all patients. Over an average follow-up of 21 months, recurrence was zero. Groin pain on a scale from 1 to 10, was either a zero or one in 23 patients (96%) while one 4% had moderate (4/10) pain. No patients had testicular pain. Conclusion: Indirect inguinal hernia repair using the Ultrapro Plug and the “double slit” technique is very effective with low rates of recurrence and significant chronic pain. P-12498 Hybrid ventral hernia repair: A novel approach to abdominal wall reconstruction Podolsky E, Yoo J Duke University Although ventral hernia repair is one of the most common general surgeries performed, no consensus exists on proper technique. Historically, open primary fascial approximation repairs were performed but were plagued by high recurrence rates. Advances in technology offered laparoscopic approaches with pliable meshes. Advantages of laparoscopy including decreased postoperative pain and ileus, and shorter length of stay were realized. This repair abandoned the dictum of hernia sac excision and primary fascial approximation instead using a mesh for bridging which can result in seroma formation leaving a visible bulge and nidus for infection. The hybrid technique combines the open and laparoscopic approach, optimizing the approach to ventral hernia repair. 22 patients underwent hybrid ventral hernia repair. Laparoscopic entry was performed first, allowing lysis of adhesions and inspection of the abdominal wall and defect measurement. An incision was then made directly over the defect permitting hernia sac excision. Endoscopic component separation was performed if necessary. Mesh was inserted into the abdomen, fascia primarily closed, and the abdomen reinsufflated. Four quadrant transfascial sutures were used to prevent mesh migration and numerous absorbable tacks were used to achieve maximum mesh-to-abdominal wall co-aptation S85 Six males and sixteen females underwent hybrid repair. Umbilical, incisional, and recurrent hernias were included, emergent and elective. Average age was 47 years (29-66). Average BMI was 32 kg/m2 (22-49). Average mesh size was 242 cm2 (48-600 cm2). Average length of stay was less than 24 hours. The hybrid technique combines laparoscopy with mini-laparotomy to maximize the advantages of both approaches. It allows for excision of hernia sac and primary approximation of fascia re-creating a more physiologic abdominal wall with more equal distribution of abdominal wall tension. It permits placement of large meshes while limiting incision size and undermining flaps. Laparoscopy decreases bowel manipulation, post-operative pain, and length of stay. P-12499 Recurrence rates of laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) technique inguinal hernia repairs when performed alone vs at the time of robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy Keating J, Schuricht A Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania Background: The association between inguinal hernias and prostatectomy has been well documented. Concomitant repair of inguinal hernias at the time of open, laparoscopic and robotic prostatectomy has been well described and the procedures are well tolerated. Methods: Between July 2006 and December 2011, 137 consecutive inguinal hernia repairs were performed by a single surgeon at one institution. These procedures were performed using a laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay of mesh (IPOM) technique both as a singular procedure or concomitantly with robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP). All repairs were enacted by using a 3 by 6 inch piece of Omega 3 FA coated mesh (Atrium C-QUR) fixated with spiral tacks. A retrospective chart review and telephone survey was conducted to assess adverse outcomes in this patient population. Results: A total of 63 IPOM procedures without prostatectomy and 74 IPOM procedures during RALP were performed. There were four recurrences in these 127 consecutive implants (2.92%) with follow up time ranging between 1. 7 and 7 years. All four recurrences occurred when IPOM was performed as a lone procedure (4/63; 6.35%), as opposed to at the time of RALP (0/73,0%). Conclusion: Inguinal hernia repairs using the IPOM technique both as a singular procedure and concomitantly during RALP have an acceptably low rate of recurrence. In our experience, there was a lower rate of recurrence when performed at the time of prostatectomy. During the robotic prostatectomy, the lower abdominal wall fascia is partially denuded of its peritoneal covering, allowing mesh apposition directly to the fascia. Conversely, primary IPOM procedures, by definition and in practice, oppose the mesh to intact peritoneum. The placement of coated mesh against intact peritoneum, as opposed to against bare fascia, may result in decreased tissue ingrowth and therefore higher rates of recurrence. S86 P-12500 Use of narrow mesh for the repair of inguinal hernia Nicolo E Department of General Surgery, Jefferson Regional Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of open anterior mesh repair of inguinal hernia by using a new narrow preshaped mesh (indian canoa shaped, wide 2 cm, long 5 cm, lateral to the spermatic cord) on postsurgical pain and recurrence. Materials and methods: A double-blind randomized clinical trial was performed on 261 patients undergoing open anterior mesh repair of inguinal hernia from January 2008 through June 2009. Pain at POD 1, 1 and 6 months after surgery, and 1 year after surgery was evaluated in both groups using a visual analog scale. Results were compared using chi-square analysis. Results: Of the total number of patients enrolled in the study (median age 51, range 27-86; 94% males) 134 were in the Lichtenstein group (LG), and 127 were in the narrow mesh group (NMG). Using the visual analog scale to detect severity of pain on postsurgical day 1, median scores in the LG and NMG were 3.2 (range 1 to 4) versus 2.8 (range 2 to 4.5). At 1 month after surgery, these scores were 0.9 (range 0 to 3.7) in the LG versus 4 (range 0 to 1.2) in the NMG. Between 6 months and 1 year after surgery, median scores in the LG and NMG were 0.4 (range 1 to 3.4) versus 0 (range 0-0.2). At 1 year chronic inguinodynia post-hernioplasty was seen in 0 (0%) of patients in the NMG and 12 (9%) patients in the LG (p<0.001). There were no deaths and no wound infections. There was 1 (0.7%) recurrence in the LG (p<0.97). Conclusions: In this study we propose a new shaped mesh and demonstrate it achieves the following: 1. the presence in the inguinal canal of a minimal mesh volume 2. does not bridge the defect but at the same time retains the tension-free status 3. does not encircle the cord at all 4. the cord is almost completely surrounded by the internal oblique muscle 5. brings the IOM close to the inguinal ligament reconstituting the function of the muscle and restricting the inguinal area and makes it more resistant to the abdominal pressure P-12501 Reinforced dermis graft for ventral hernia repair Sahoo S, DeLozier K, Derwin K Cleveland Clinic Poor long-term durability of biologic grafts often results in bulging, dehiscence and recurrence after VHR. There is an unmet need for a graft that possesses both the adequate biologic and long-term mechanical properties to prevent complications and improve outcomes following VHR. We propose the novel concept of stitching small amounts of non-resorbable fiber into biologic grafts to develop a mechanically durable, yet largely natural biologic graft that is both safe and effective for VHR. The objective of this work is to investigate fiber-reinforcement as a means to improve and maintain the mechanical properties of HADM during simulated in vivo conditions. 5x5cm HADM grafts were reinforced with 4wt% of 2-0 Prolene. Native and reinforced (r-HADM) grafts were treated with 21U/ml collagenase for 8h using an in vitro enzymatic degradation assay Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S50-S97 intended to simulate in vivo degradation. Test constructs were mechanically tested before and after enzymatic degradation (n≥6/group/condition) in ball-burst and planar biaxial test setups. Grafts were tested by both load-to-failure and cyclic fatigue tests. Biaxial test images were analyzed using videometric strain analysis to compute the strain distribution within the graft. Failure load, burst strength, stiffness and cyclic dilatational strain (percent change in area) of the grafts were reported. Fiber reinforcement improved failure load, burst strength and stiffness of HADM, both before and after enzymatic degradation. All grafts underwent significant elongation during cyclic loading. 0h HADM and both 0h and 8h r-HADM patches showed similar cyclic fatigue behavior (25%−40% dilatational strain after 1000 cycles). Enzymatic degradation resulted in significantly higher rate and amount of strain (52%−65% strain at 1000 cycles) of 8h HADM patches, with only a fraction of specimens surviving the 1000 cycles. These results show that fiber reinforcement imparts mechanical durability to r-HADM during enzymatic degradation. We are currently validating r-HADM durability in a pre-clinical VHR model. P-12502 Repari of abdominal incisional hernia by reconstructing the midline and with the onlay use of biological material Nicolo E Department of General Surgery, Jefferson Regional Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA Background: The aim of this study is to describe the feasibility and efficacy of a new operative technique that reconstitutes the midline with the onlay use of biologic material as adjuvant for the treatment of large abdominal incisional hernia. Materials and methods: Between January 2002 and December 2008 a total of 71 patients underwent repair of a large incisional hernia with the onlay placement of biological material after the reconstitution of the midline. Results: The median size of the defect was 195 cm2 (range, 150420). The median operative time was 125 minutes. No intraoperative complications occurred. The median length of hospital stay was 6 days. Mortality was nil. Wound seroma was the most frequent and annoying postoperative complication observed in 51 (71%) patients. There was 1 (1.4%) recurrence. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the importance of the reconstitution of the midline for the repair of incisional hernia. The success of the procedure is achieved by the onlay use of biological material as an adjunctive that provides the conditions for the complete and definitive healing of the midline. Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S50-S97 P-12507 Outcomes of 157 v-patch implants in the repair of umbilical, epigastric, and incisional hernias Keating J, Schuricht A, Data J Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania Background: Umbilical and epigastric hernias have traditionally been repaired using a Mayo or tensioned suture technique, resulting in recurrence rates as high as 40% and 54%, respectively. Recent studies have shown that a tension-free repair using mesh can drastically decrease recurrence rates. Wound complication rates associated with onlay prosthetic placement have led physicians to favor a retrofascial prosthetic placement. Reinforced deployment prostheses enable retrofascial placement through a small incision, thus avoiding both the potential morbidity of a larger incision and the costs associated with a laparoscopic approach. Methods: A retrospective chart review and telephone survey of all umbilical, epigastric and incisional hernias repaired with V-Patch, a reinforced deployment prosthesis, by a single surgeon. Data analysis included: patient characteristics, operative and post-operative metrics, hernia recurrence and complication rates. Results: 156 procedures were performed. Implants were performed from 12/08/09 through 1/28/13. Patient age ranged from 20 to 85 (mean 48). There were 88 females (57.9%) and 64 males (42.1%). The average BMI was 30.6 (range 16.6-58.5). Patch size distribution was 78 small (49.7%), 55 medium (35.0%), and 24 large (15.3%). There were 81 umbilical hernias (51.6%), 36 epigastric hernias (22.9%), 39 incisional hernias (24.8%) and 1 multiply recurrent inguinal hernia (0.6%) repaired. Follow-up time ranged from 8 months to 3.8 years. There were 6 hernia recurrences (3.8%). Complications included 3 patients (1.9%) with mesh infection, 1 with an enterocutaneous fistula (0.6%), and 1 patient with small bowel obstruction (0.6%). Four patients required patch explantation (2.5%). Conclusion: The use of the V-Patch reinforced deployment prosthesis is effective in treatment of umbilical, epigastric, and incisional hernias. Its use is associated with a low rate of complications. P-12508 Ventral hernia repair with component separation technique: the impact of drain duration on wound complications Levy S, Plymale M, Davenport D, Smith N, Whittington H, Roth J University of Kentucky Background: In order to evacuate accumulating fluid, closed suction silastic drainage tubes are placed between the mesh and the abdominal wall during ventral hernia repair with abdominal wall reconstruction. Recent literature does not define best practice for timing of drain removal. We are interested in the impact on the incidence of wound complications of the length of time drains are left in place. Methods: After receiving IRB approval, we queried our surgical database for component separation cases from 2009-2012. Number of drains, days post-operatively that last drain was removed, and days postoperatively that wound complication presented were recorded. Wound complications were defined as superficial cellulitis, seroma/hematoma, superficial infection, and deep infection. Results: A total of 117 component separation cases were found; only cases with CDC Class I wound were included (n=64). Longest drain duration varied widely (2-171 days post-operatively; mean=22 days). Cases were divided into four groups based on number of days post- S87 operative of last drain removal: ≤ 7 days (n=18), 8-14 days (n=16), 15-21 days (n=14), or ≥ 22 days (n=16). No significant relationship was found between incidence of seroma/hematoma and days postoperatively of last drain removal. Wound complications increased linearly with drain time (chi-square p=0.038, test for linear trend p=0.006). Using logistic regression to adjust for obesity, patients with drains in for 29+ days had a 10.4 odds ratio for wound occurrence relative to drains in ≤ 1 week (95% CI 1.9-58.6, p=0.008). Conclusions: Wound complications occur frequently following this procedure. Although many factors are involved in development of wound complications, we found an increased incidence of wound infection for patients with drains remaining more than three weeks post-operatively compared to patients that had drains removed earlier. In order to define best practice of timing of drain removal a prospective study would be beneficial. P-12509 Effects of administration of Celecoxib and Ibuprofen on reducing postoperative intra-abdominal adhesion in an experimental rat model Gónzalez-Ojeda A, Álvarez-Villaseñor A, Fuentes-Orozco C, Chávez-Tostado M, Macías-Amezcua M, García-Rentería J, Agredano-Jiménez R Research Unit in Clinical Epidemiology, Specialties Hospital, Western Medical Center, Mexican Institute of Social Security. Background: Intraperitoneal adhesion is a major consequence after abdominal surgery, and its prevention is an important goal. Adhesion formation depends on angiogenesis. The COX-2 selective inhibitors are the only approved drugs, which presumably could selectively inhibit angiogenesis associated with new adhesion formation. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of Celecoxib and Ibuprofen in reducing or preventing postoperative adhesion formation in an experimental rat model. Materials and methods: Wistar rats were used as the experimental model to study adhesion formation after a median laparotomy to remove an area of the abdominal wall, replaced with polypropylene mesh. They were divided into three groups of 10 rats: Control (no medication), Celecoxib (68 mg/kg/day) and Ibuprofen (30 mg/kg/12hrs). Drugs were administered orally 12 hours and for eight days after mesh implantation. On day 9, rats were reoperated to evaluate their intra-abdominal adhesions macroscopically. The mesh area was resected and fixed in 10% formalin for microscopic evaluation. All animals were euthanized under general anesthesia. The results are expressed as means and standard deviations. Differences between groups were evaluated with the Mann-Whitney U test and were considered statistically significant when p<0.05, using the statistical software IBM SPSS for Windows (version 20), property of IBM corporation. The protocol was approved by the local research committee (Code 2011-1301-69) and all animals were treated in compliance with Institutional and Mexican Federal Regulations (NOM-062-ZOO-1999). Results: Macroscopic scores, using the Adhesion Scoring Group System for severity and extension, were 2.9±0.52 for Control group, 2.4±0.38 for Ibuprofen group, and 1.1±0.15 Celecoxib group. The differences were statistically significant between the control group and Ibuprofen group (p=0.001) and Celecoxib group (p=0.000). Celecoxib and Ibuprofen groups were compared, the results favored the Celecoxib treated group (p=0.000). Conclusions: Celecoxib reduces intraperitoneal adhesions, making them laxer, softer and with less vascularity. S88 P-12510 Long term of totally laparoscopic treatment of Spigelian hernias Peralta G, Franklin M, Hernandez M, Palomo R, Real Romo Z Tec Salud Introduction: Spigelian hernias are formed by a protrusion through the Spigelian aponeurosis. They often present with vague signs and symptoms, and the diagnosis can be problematic or elusive. It´s incidence varies from 0.12%-2% of all abdominal wall hernias. Most Spigelian hernias are treated with open surgery and without mesh; little is known of the laparoscopic treatment and the long-term follow-up with mesh. The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the laparoscopic treatment of Spigelian hernias with mesh at the Texas Endosurgery Institute. Methods: From February 1991 through December 2012, all Spigelian hernias treated laparoscopically with mesh were prospectively followed. The technique was essentially the same for each procedure and involved (1) lysis of adhesions, (2) reduction of hernia contents, (3) closure of the defect, (4) 3-5 cm circumferential mesh coverage beyond the original edges, and (5) trans-fascial fixation of the mesh. Results: Twenty five patients were analyzed, all of them having Spigelian hernia. The subjects included 15 women (60%) and 10 men (40%), with an age of 62.5±26.5 years. The height of patients was 171±27cm, with a weight of 85.7±32.2 kg. The operative time was 80±40 min. The estimated blood loss was 15±15 ml. The overall postoperative complication rate was 12%. No conversions to open approach were required. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 2 days (range from same-day discharge to 5 days). The mean follow up was 84.6 months (range 13-176 months); no recurrence has been observed. Conclusion: The laparoscopic treatment is efficient for repairing Spigelian hernias, as it offers advantages such as excellent visibility, minimal morbidity and sometimes, with no hospital admission. P-12511 Evaluation of absorbable mesh fixation devices at various deployment angles Zihni A, Cavallo J, Thompson D, Chowdhury N, Frisella M, Matthews B, Deeken C Washington University in St Louis, Department of Surgery, Section of Minimally Invasive Surgery Hernia repair failure may occur due to suboptimal mesh fixation by mechanical constructs before mesh integration. Construct design and acute penetration angle may alter mesh-tissue fixation strength. We compared acute fixation strengths of absorbable fixation devices at various deployment angles, directions of loading, and construct orientations. Methods: Porcine abdominal walls were sectioned. Constructs were deployed at 30, 45, 60, and 90 degree angles to fix mesh to the tissue specimens. Lap-shear testing was performed in upward, downward, and lateral directions in relation to the abdominal wall cranial-caudal axis to evaluate fixation. Absorbatack™ (AT), SorbaFix™ (SF), and SecureStrap™ in vertical (SSV) and horizontal (SSH) orientations in relation to the abdominal wall cranial-caudal axis were tested. Ten tests were performed for each combination of device, angle, and loading direction. Failure types and strength data were recorded. Mean fixation strengths were compared with two-tailed unpaired student’s t-tests (p<0.05 considered significant). Tukey-Kramer adjustments were applied to correct for multiple comparisons. Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S50-S97 Results: At 30 degrees, SSH and SSV had greater fixation strengths (12.95 N, 12.98 N, respectively) than SF (5.70 N; p=0.0057, p=0.0053, respectively). At 45 degrees, mean fixation strength of SSH was significantly greater than SF (18.14 N, 11.40 N; p=0.0002). No differences in strength were identified at 60 or 90 degrees. No differences in strength were noted between SSV and SSH with different directions of loading. No differences were noted between SS and AT at any angle. Immediate failure was associated with SF fixation (p<0.0001) and the 30 degree tacking angle (p<0.01). Conclusions: Mesh-tissue fixation was stronger at acute deployment angles with SS compared to SF constructs. The 30 degree angle and the SF device were associated with increased immediate failures. Varying construct and loading direction did not generate significant differences in the fixation strength of absorbable fixation devices in this study. P-12512 A cellular dermal matrix in recurrent infected ventral hernia repair. A case report Levy S, Plymale M, Roth J University of Kentucky Introduction: The management of infected ventral hernias is a challenging problem. The use of a synthetic material carries significant risk of mesh infection. Component separation techniques allow for tissue advancement for primary defect closure. The adjunct of a biologic mesh may serve to reinforce the repair. The role of acellular dermal matrices has been recently challenged in the repair of ventral hernias largely due to cost concerns. However, infected contaminated hernias represent an area in which dermal tissue offers advantages over many other synthetic materials. This case highlights a case of a recurrent infected hernia repair with a human acellular dermal matrix. Case description: A 46 y.o. Gentleman with h/o perforated diverticulitis and Hartman procedure presented with a third time recurrent ventral incisional hernia. The two prior repairs both resulted in mesh infection and explants. The most recent repair with a porcine dermal matrix resulted in a postoperative wound complication and the need for a skin graft. Months following skin grafting, the wound remained contaminated. Hernia repair was performed in an extraperitoneal manner with bilateral transversus abdominal muscle release and placement of a HADM in the retro-rectus space. Postoperative wound complications ensued requiring two additional re-admissions but the hernia was ultimately repaired without evidence of recurrence as of this time. Discussion: Patients with recurrent hernias in the setting of active contamination and prior infection represent a unique challenge. This patient with 3 prior mesh infections and a recurrent contaminated hernia has done well to date with a biologic mesh reinforcement to a transverses abdominis release. Conclusion: The use of biologic meshes such as a HADM should be considered as an adjunct to abdominal wall reconstruction in challenging infected abdominal wall hernia repairs. Although the use of biologic meshes has been contested, when utilized appropriately, good results can be anticipated. Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S50-S97 P-12513 TAPP in inguinoscrotal hernias Cingolani P, Fernando I Hospital Universitario Austral There are two main problems in this type of hernias which make this procedure more complex. First the size of the hernia sac which could require a very complicated dissection and secondly a large defect needs an extensive reconstruction of the abdominal wall with a large mesh to avoid recurrences. The treatment for this type of hernias by laparoscopy demands a careful selection of patients. We believe that this type of procedure needs surgeons who work in teams, in high volume laparoscopic centers, with solid knowledge of abdominal wall anatomy. Several technical aspects of this surgery should be known in order to achieve better outcomes the reduction of large indirect sacs is the greatest difficulty in this type of hernias. Whenever possible, a complete reduction of the peritoneal sac is attempted; and it is easier to identify the elements of the cord and avoid injuries. If not possible, the peritoneal sac is sectioned as high as possible. The epigastric vessels do not need to be sectioned routinely. We use a ligthweigth composite mesh of 15 x 15 cm. In large indirect defects the overlapping of the mesh has to reach approximately 1-3 cm lateral to ASIS with a stapled fixation. We don’t usually use drainage. The rate of complications is higher than normal hernias. The recurrence rate in these types of hernias could be related to the small size of the mesh. In this type of hernias, a mesh with insufficient overlapping may be pushed into the defect. For this procedure a larger mesh (15 x 15 cm) should be used and always with adequated fixation in conclusion under some conditions wich are a careful selection of patients, trained surgical teams and some special technical considerations we can have acceptable outcomes compared to normal laparoscopic hernias. P-12514 Closure of the defect in LVHR Cingolani P Hospital Universitario Austral Laparoscopic approach for ventral hernias in any locations can be a safe and effective repair technique. The benefits of minimal access are well known. The repair of the ventral hernia with bridging the defect with mesh leads to bulging and seromas and doesn’t restore the physiology of the abdominal wall. We present different techniques to close the defect prior to mesh placement. LVHR with defect closure confers more advantage in the repair with a more physiologic abdominal wall reconstruction and reduction in postoperative seromas. Special attention can be focused in postoperative pain who represents the most important complication of this procedure. We present our experience in 50 cases with this technique in a university hospital. S89 P-12515 Initial experience with novel large-pore polypropylene mesh in complex open ventral hernia Cobb W, Vargas K, Warren J, Carbonell A Hernia Center, Greenville Health Center Background: The open repair of complex incisional hernias utilizing a large-pore polypropylene mesh in the retrorectus space is becoming the preferred approach. Wound morbidity remains a concern; however, mesh infection is rare with the larger pore polypropylene constructs. We report our initial series using a novel, large-pore polypropylene mesh in the retrorectus space for complex abdominal wall defects. Methods: A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained hernia database was performed at our center. The initial experience with a macroporous, condensed polypropylene mesh (Vitamesh, Proxy Biomedical, Galwin, Ireland) was reviewed. Data on all patients undergoing complex open incisional hernia repair was included. Results: Eleven patients underwent open repair of their ventral wall defect utilizing a retrorectus placement of Vitamesh. Fascial closure was achieved in all but one case. The mean BMI was 33.3 (range 27-50.1). Of this complex patient population, 5/11 patients had previous failed mesh repairs, 5/11 were diabetic, and 5/11 were active or previous tobacco smokers. Wound classification was clean in 7 cases; clean-contaminated in 2 and contaminated in 2. Mean defect size was 174 cm2, requiring an average mesh size of 517 cm2. Minor wound events occurred in two patients: one with serous drainage and another with a hematoma. No overt mesh infections have developed. Conclusion: In this complex patient population, Vitamesh appears to function well for abdominal wall reconstruction. Initial results are promising; however, longer follow-up data will be required to make any conclusive recommendations. S90 P-12516 The principles of complexity science applied to the care of patients with a ventral hernia Peters C, Ramshaw B Halifax Health Introduction: A complexity science approach for healthcare allows simplification of patient care by designing care around definable groups, diseases, and/or problems. The information generated by these care processes can be used to improve value-based outcomes of care over time. Methods: Approximately 100 patients presenting with ventral hernias have been evaluated under this model. A subgroup of 49 patients who underwent attempted laparoscopic approach for ventral hernia repair with an all PTFE mesh has been statistically analyzed and the data has been compared with published data to evaluate effectiveness of this model. Outcomes that define value for this process include quality measures, like recurrence and pain, patient satisfaction, and costs for the entire cycle of care. Statistical analyses included factor analysis, which evaluates complex interactions of many variables and determines which factors correlate most highly with outcomes. Results: Patients treated in this model experienced hernia recurrence rate of 0%, a readmission rate of 2.2% (1 patient), a re-operation rate of 0%, and a 4.3% incidence of chronic pain (pain persisting longer than 3 months-2 patients). Using complex data analytics, the factors which correlated most strongly with patient outcomes are emotional complexity (depression, anxiety, symptoms of PTSD, etc.), surgical complexity (size and location of hernia, number of prior abdominal operations, etc.), and number of hernia recurrences. Factors often associated with surgical outcomes, such as BMI, smoking and diabetes had no significant influence on the outcomes for this care process. Conclusion: A complexity science model for the care of patients with ventral hernia has the potential to improve the value of care for this group of patients. The use of a laparoscopic approach using PTFE mesh has value for a complex group of patients with a ventral hernia. P-12517 Value-based clinical quality improvement for abdominal wall reconstruction Mirmehdi I, Ramshaw B Halifax Health Introduction: Patients considering an abdominal wall reconstruction procedure often have very complex abdominal wall pathology. The principles of complex systems science can help to understand how to define, measure and improve the value of the entire cycle of care for patients who undergo an abdominal wall reconstruction. Methods: A multidisciplinary hernia team has defined the process of care for patients with complex abdominal wall hernias who chose to undergo an abdominal wall reconstruction. Over the past 18 months, several attempts at process improvement have been instituted in an attempt to improve the outcomes that measure value- quality, cost and patient satisfaction measures. Process improvement initiatives include implementing a person-centered, team approach for patient care, using a long-term resorbable mesh (TIGR Matrix) and adapting a Transversus Abdominus Release (TAR) approach for abdominal wall reconstruction. Results: There were 34 patients cared for after the initial process improvement (use of TIGR Matrix) and 10 patients who underwent the TAR approach. Value-based outcomes included length of stay, Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S50-S97 return to activities, recurrent hernias, costs and satisfaction with the cycle of care. The most difficult measure has been determining accurate costs for the entire cycle of care. The most significant cost reduction in materials costs has been the use of a long-term resorbable mesh (30 x 20 cm costing $3900) in place of a biologic mesh (30 x 20 costing $13,200 - xenograft or $17,626 - two allografts sewn together) and the use of the TAR approach in place of an endoscopic component separation approach. Conclusion: Value-based outcomes measures including costs, quality and patient satisfaction should be defined and measured to allow for sustainable improvement of value. We found that long-term resorbable mesh used in place of a biologic mesh contributes to improved value in abdominal wall reconstruction. P-12518 Pure single incision versus plus one punctured single incision for TAPP Chihara N, Suzuki H, Watanabe M, Nakata R, Uchida E Institute of Gastroenterology, Nippon Medical School, Musashikosugi Hospital Single incision laparoscopic surgery has been reported for a repair of groin hernia. We experienced pure-single incision (P-SI) TAPP. As a result, we considered that the surgeon-camera assistant coordination was essential to avoid clashing of the instruments and the laparoscope during the whole procedure. Consequently we reached the conclusion that the plus one puncture helped to solve these problems. Herein, we report the plus one puncture- single incision (POPSI) TAPP method. This technique aimed to reduce an opportunity to clash and gain less invasive umbilical incision and cosmetic merit equivalent to P-SI. Plus one puncture was applied through thin caliber trocar (2-mm minimal port) with needle forceps which is thin caliber grasper. The puncture was placed at the left lower abdominal area on the midclavicular line. The surgical procedure was the same as for standard laparoscopic TAPP. We experienced single incision TAPP in 45 patients (23 P-SI, 22 POP-SI). The mean age was 51.0±15.6 and 54.3±16.9, BMI was 22.2±2.6 and 20.7±2.1, respectively. We evaluated postoperative pain using 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS) score on 1st and 2nd, 7th postoperative day and the degree of postoperative cosmetic satisfaction in ten steps.10 points meant excellent wound. VAS scores for postoperative pain were no significant differences between P-SI and POP-SI. From the personal cosmetic point of view, POP-SI was obtained higher satisfaction than P-SI, because of gaining scarless on the one puncture and umbilical site. Our new technique with plus one puncture enabled us to reduce the instrumental clash, and obtained the similar quality of the triangulation as the conventional 3-port TAPP. In addition, this procedure provided more excellent satisfaction. Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S50-S97 P-12521 Cosmetic mesh repair of severe rectus diastasis Cheesborough J, Workman C, Dumanian G Northwestern University Introduction: Standard abdominoplasty rectus plication techniques may not suffice for the most severe cases of rectus diastasis. In our experience, prosthetic mesh facilitates the repair of severe female pattern rectus diastasis and male pattern epigastric rectus diastasis with or without concomitant ventral hernias. Technique: After skin elevation and exposure of the anterior rectus fascia, the retrorectus space is developed just lateral to the linea alba. Soft polypropylene uncoated mesh, 7 cm in transverse dimension, is anchored with transrectus polypropylene sutures with bites taken 4 cm from the incised edge of fascia. The rectus muscles are then approximated in the midline with interrupted permanent suture. Skin tailoring via horizontal or vertical pattern abdominoplasty can be safely performed simultaneously. Methods: A retrospective review of all abdominal wall surgery patients treated in the last four years by the senior author was performed. Those patients with either an isolated rectus diastasis repair with mesh or a combined ventral hernia repair with abdominoplasty were analyzed. Results: Five patients, four female and one male, underwent mesh reinforced midline repair with horizontal or vertical abdominoplasty. Patient characteristics include: average age 41 years, average BMI 25.9, all nonsmokers, average width of diastasis 7.1 cm, and average surgery time 166 minutes. After an average of 20 months of follow up, none of the patients had recurrence of either a bulge or a hernia by physical examination. Conclusions: For male and female patients with significant rectus diastasis, with or without concomitant hernias, the described mesh repair is both safe and durable. Although this is a larger operation than plication alone, it may be safely combined with standard horizontal or vertical abdominoplasty skin excision techniques to provide an aesthetically pleasing overall result. P-12522 Predicting poor post-operative quality of life (QOL) following inguinal hernia repair (IHR) Williams K, Bradley J, Wormer B, Walters A, Lincourt A, Augenstein V, Heniford B Carolinas Medical Center Introduction: IHR is the most common operation performed in the world with the most common complication being chronic discomfort. Predictors of QOL outcomes are rarely discussed. This study examines factors forecasting a poor post-operative QOL. Methods: The prospective International Hernia Mesh Registry (IHMR) was queried for patients undergoing IHR (2007-2012). Demographics, operations, outcomes were analyzed. Using the Carolinas Comfort Scale (CCS), the worst QOL outcomes (post-operative CCS≥3) at 1-year were evaluated. Standard statistical analysis was applied; p<0.05 was significant. Results: 1904 IHR were examined. One year follow-up was 83.3%. Demographics included: age-56±14.7 years, BMI-26.1±4.9 kg/m2, 94% male. Pre-operatively, moderate to debilitating (CCS≥3) pain and movement limitation were seen in 36.3% and 29.5% of the population. The majority of IHR were outpatient (57.8%), open (58.9%) under general anesthesia (62.7%) for primary (89.1%), unilateral (80.0%) hernias. Mesh used was polypropylene (99.8%), lightweight (61.1%) with suture (56.3%), tack (29.9%) or glue (6.8%) fixation. Postoperative complications included seroma (3.3%), recurrence S91 (1.9%) and hematoma (1.8%). Pre-op pain and movement limitation, anesthesia type, recurrent, bilateral, hematoma, recurrence, and reoperation were all significant factors in poor post-operative QOL (CCS≥3). Odds of equivalent or worse post-operative symptoms were significantly increased for pre-operative CCS≥3, increased with preoperative severity and remained significant when patients with complications were excluded. Odds ratios (95% CI) for post-operative pain: 3.5 (2.1-5.7) for pre-op CCS≥3, 4.1 (1.8-9.3) for pre-op CCS≥4, 19.5 (4.8-79.6) for pre-op CCS=5. Odds ratios (95% CI) for postoperative movement limitation: 3.3 (1.8-5.8) for pre-op CCS≥3, 7.0 (2.9-16.9) pre-op CCS≥4, 9.6 (2.3-38.9) for pre-op CCS=5. Odds ratios (95% CI) for post-operative mesh sensation: 2.6 (1.6-4.3) for pre-op CCS≥3, 3.5 (1.5-7.9) for pre-op CCS≥4, 8.0 (1.9-33.9) for pre-op CCS=5. Conclusions: IHR factors impacting poor QOL outcomes include recurrent or bilateral hernias, postoperative hematoma, or reoperation. Preoperative symptoms significantly predict equivalent or worse postoperative QOL. Surgeons should stress to patients that significant preoperative pain and movement limitation may not be improved postoperatively despite adequate surgical repair. P-12523 Risk and outcomes of appendectomy with laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) Kim M, Ross S, Oommen B, Walters A, Augenstein V, Heniford B Department of Surgery, Division of GI and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC Introduction: Appendectomy performed at the time of other procedures has long been a point of controversy among surgeons. We hypothesize that appendectomy at the time of LVHR (LVHR-A) results in worse outcomes than with hernia repair alone (LVHR). Methods: The American College of Surgeons-NSQIP database was queried from 2005-2011 for all LVHR and LVHR-A. Patients with age <18 years, emergency procedures, ruptured appendicitis and abscess were excluded. Demographics, patient characteristics, operative details and outcomes were analyzed with standard statistical methods, with significance set at p<0.05. Results: 49606 LVHR and 101 LVHR-A were performed. Groups varied significantly by age (54.1±14.7 vs 50.8±16.1 years), BMI (30.7±8.0 vs 29.5±6.6 kg/m2), gender (male: 54.7% vs 46.4%), and inpatient status (28.9% vs 52.8%); p<0.05. LVHR had more hypertension (40.7% vs 27.4%), smokers (18.1% vs 16.0%), dyspnea with moderate exertion (6.2% vs 4.7%), and ASA Class III or IV (30.1% vs 19.8%), but less ETOH use (>2 drinks/day, 2.8% vs 6.7%), severe COPD (2.8% vs 4.7%), bleeding disorders (2.0% vs 3.8%) and overall lower modified CCI (0.24±0.68 vs 0.32±0.75); all p<0.05. LVHRA had higher rates of sepsis (0.05% vs 16.4%) and contaminated or dirty wounds (0.8% vs 39.6%). LVHR had longer operative time (83.9±52.5 vs 65.3±32.1 min) but shorter length of stay (1.1±2.9 vs 1.7±3.5 days). Additionally, LVHR had with fewer wound (0.9 vs 1.9%) and minor (2.3% vs 4.7%) complications; however, major complications (1.3% vs 0.9%) and 30-day mortality (0.1% vs 0%) were increased in LVHR; all p<0.001. After multivariate analysis was performed to control for age, ASA, CCI and exertional dyspnea, only minor complications were found to be higher in LVHR-A (OR=3.02, CI 1.25-7.27; p<0.05), with no significant differences in wound complications, major complications, or mortality; all p>0.05. Conclusion: In selected patients appendectomy may be safely performed at the time of non-emergent LVHR with minimal additional risk of short-term major morbidity. However, careful consideration must be given to the specific clinical indications and advantages to the individual patient. S92 P-12525 Laparoscopic repair of suprapubic ventral hernias: a retrospective comparison with other laparoscopic ventral hernia repairs Ray S, Aihni A, Baalman S, Frisells M, Deeken C, Matthews B Washington University School of Medicine Introduction: Laparoscopic suprapubic hernia repairs (LSPHR) are technically difficult due to dissection near important neurovascular and bony structures, the bladder, and are often in areas of multiple previous operations. Due to increased rates of recurrence in LSPHRs in previous studies, the use of transabdominal suture fixation to the pubic bone, Cooper’s ligament, and above the iliopubic tract has been recommended. This study retrospectively evaluates outcomes of LSPHR. Methods: A retrospective review of 352 patients undergoing laparoscopic ventral hernia repair was conducted between 2004 and 2011 at an academic surgery center for a single surgeon. Suprapubic hernias were identified as those occurring within four centimeters of the pubic symphysis. Patient data, including demographics, operative time, length-of-stay, hernia size, and recurrences were reviewed. Data were compared using Student’s T-test and Chi-square or Fisher’s Exact Test where appropriate. Results: 365 patients were reviewed. Eighty-four had LSPHR, 281 had other ventral hernia repairs (OVHR). LSPHRs included 17 males and 67 females. OVHRs had 143 males and 139 females. Mean age for LSPHRs was 51.9 years and 57.1 years for OVHR (p<0.05). Mean BMI for LSPHR and OVHR were 34.1 and 34.0 (p=0.91), respectively. Average hernia defect was 216.7 cm2 for LSPHR and 148.9 cm2 for OVHR (p<0.05). Mean operative times were 182.6 minutes and 157.0 minutes (p<0.05) for LSPHR and OVHR. Length of stay for LSPHR was 4.3 days and 4.7 days for OVHR (p=0.28). Mean follow-up was 18.1 months for LSPHR, and 13.2 months for OVHR (p<0.001). There were 5 recurrences in the LSPHR group (6.0%), and 11 in the OVHR group (3.9%) (p=0.16). Conclusions: Despite larger defect sizes and longer operative times, suprapubic hernias had similar recurrence rates and perioperative outcomes when compared to other ventral hernias repaired laparoscopically. Technical alterations in mesh fixation have limited recurrences to a clinically acceptable level. P-12527 Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in high volume versus low volume centers: does case mix affect patient outcomes? Ross S, Kim M, Oommen B, Bradley J, Williams K, Tsirline V, Zemlyak A, Augenstein V, Heniford B Carolinas Medical Center, Dept. of Surgery, Division of Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgery Introduction: Although inguinal hernia repair is one of the most common General Surgery procedures, debate regarding the operative approach continues. We examined the institutional volume of laparoscopic (LIHR) and open inguinal hernia repairs (OIHR) and their corresponding outcomes. Methods: The International Hernia Mesh Registry was queried for all IHR. Institutions reporting less than 50 cases were excluded. High volume laparoscopic centers (HVLC) were defined as centers that performed >60% LIHR. The Carolinas Comfort Scale was used to measure quality of life (QOL). Surgical outcomes and QOL were analyzed using standard statistical methods. Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S50-S97 Results: There were 2,224 IHRs performed at thirteen centers. There were 7 HVLC and 6 low volume laparoscopic centers (LVLC). A total of only 7 LIHR were reported by all LVLC. Four of the LVLC performed no LIHR (67.7%). On average, HVLC performed 81.9% LIHR. At HVLC, there was a 0.7% rate of hematoma, 4.6% rate of seroma, 1.9% rate of recurrence and 0.1% rate of surgical site infections (SSI) reported for LIHR. No differences were found in the rate of surgical complications for OIHR between HVLC and LVLC (hematoma 2.6% vs 2.3%; seroma 2.6% vs 1.6%; recurrence 0.7% vs 1.8%; SSI 0% vs 0.9%; all p>0.05). There was no difference in QOL at 1 year after IHR between HVLC and LVLC (pain 11.4% vs 11.4%; activity limitation 4.0% vs 6.8%; mesh sensation 13.9% vs 12.4%; all p>0.05). At the HVLC, LIHR was associated with a decreased rate of hematoma formation when compared to OIHR (0.7 vs 2.6%, p=0.01), but there was no difference in seroma, recurrence, or SSI. Laparoscopic and open techniques demonstrated equal QOL at HVLC. Conclusions: LIHR at HVLC is associated with decreased early post-operative complications, but no significant differences exist in long-term complications or QOL. The QOL outcomes of open IHR in HVLC are equal to centers that perform essentially only OIHR; furthermore, the low volume of laparoscopic cases does not negatively impact the outcomes of OIHR. P-12528 Mesh reinforcement at time of ostomy reversal Warren J, Quigley L, Cobb W, Carbonell A Greenville Health System The fascial defect resulting from ostomy reversal is associated with a high incidence of hernia formation. We report an experience of mesh reinforcement of the stoma site fascial defect at the time of ostomy closure. Methods: A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database was performed for all patients undergoing mesh placement at the time of ostomy reversal, which is classified as a contaminated operation. A matched cohort of contaminated hernia repairs not including ostomy reversal was selected for outcomes comparison. Results: Fifty four patients underwent hernia repair at time of ostomy closure (13 Ileostomy, 41 colostomy). Midline incisional hernia was present in 57.4% of cases. Average defect area was 98.1 cm2, with a mean width of 8.8 cm. Retromuscular repair was performed in 95% of cases, with component separation in 57%. Mesh used included polypropylene (50%), bioabsorbable (39%) and biologic (11%). Surgical site occurrence (SSO) was 51.9%, and surgical site infection (SSI) 25.9%. There was no difference in SSO or SSI between the ostomy reversal group and the matched cohort (51.9% vs 52.8%; p=0.719). Interestingly, there was no difference in SSI with synthetic mesh compared to biologic or bioabsorbable mesh (29.6% vs 21.4%; p=0.547), closure of ileostomy vs colostomy (46.2% vs 19.5%; p= 0.075), or when midline incisional hernia repair was included (25.8% vs 26.1%; p=1.000). No mesh was removed for infection. Mean follow-up was 11.8 months. Overall recurrence was 7.4%, and no different between synthetic and bioabsorbable/biologic mesh (7.4 vs 7.1%; p=1) or when midline hernia was included (9.7 vs 4.3%; p=0.618). Conclusion: Mesh reinforcement of defects at time of ostomy reversal is associated with a low incidence of hernia recurrence. Despite contamination, synthetic mesh is associated with wound complications comparable to biologic and bioabsorbable meshes. Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S50-S97 P-12529 A prospective international analysis of the quality of life (QOL) outcomes for the treatment of flank hernias Bradley J, Williams K, Walters A, Wormer B, Augenstein V, Heniford B Carolinas Medical Center Background: Flank hernias are uncommon and challenging, and post-operative QOL has not been studied. Generally, FH are often painful pre-op and post-op. This study aims to identify the QOL outcomes for laparoscopic (LAP) and open (OPEN) flank hernia repair. Methods: The prospective International Hernia Mesh Registry was queried for patients undergoing flank hernia repair from 2007-2013. Demographics, comorbidities, operative details, complications and Carolinas Comfort Scale (CCS) measuring QOL were recorded. Results: Of the 54 total flank hernias, LAP was performed less often 19 (35%) than OPEN 35 (65%) OPEN. Age (57.5±13.1 vs 60.1±4.6), BMI (29.7±5.9 vs 31.4±5.9), recurrent hernias (36.8% vs 22.9%), defect size (48.5±37.4 vs 150.3±281.4 cm2) and comorbidities were similar between LAP and OPEN (p>0.05). There was no difference in preoperative pain (72.2% vs 56.2%) or movement limitation (70.6% vs 56.2%). Operative time (100.9±43.8 vs 120.9±61.6 minutes) was similar (p>0.05). Complications for LAP vs OPEN were equal for seromas (5.3% vs 2.9%; p=1.00) and reoperation (8.6% vs 3.2%; p=0.62). There were no pulmonary or cardiac complications, surgical site infections, bleeding, or mortality in either group. Length of stay was shorter for LAP (3.0±1.6 vs 6.4±4.6 days; p=0.0003). Mean follow up was 18 months. Recurrence rates were 15.8% (LAP) and 5.7% (OPEN, p=0.33). CCS scores for LAP vs OPEN were no different for pain, movement limitation or mesh sensation at any time point (all p>0.05). The number of patients with post-op pain, even at a year (31.2%), was surprising. Preoperative pain was predictive of postoperative pain at 1 (p=0.046), 6 (p=0.04), and 12 months (0.003). Conclusion: Laparoscopic and open flank hernia repair have similar outcomes and low perioperative morbidity but have recurrence rates of 6-16%. A moderate number of patients (24%-34%) have discomfort or movement limitations longterm. Preoperative pain predicts postoperative pain in these patients. Flank hernias remain a challenge and need further investigation. P-12530 Risk for venous thromboembolism after ventral hernia repair Oommen B, Kim M, Ross S, Bradley J, Walters A, Dacey K, Heniford B, Augenstein V Carolinas Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Division of Gastrointestinal & Minimally Invasive Surgery Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a rare, but potentially lethal complication. Our aim was to investigate the incidence of and risk factors for VTE in ventral hernia patients. Methods: We queried the ACS-NSQIP database (2005-2011) for non-emergent, inpatient, ventral hernia repairs (VHR). Demographics, comorbidities, perioperative details, and outcomes were analyzed for those with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE) after VHR. Standard statistical methods were used; p <0.05 was statistically significant. Results: Of 60,440 VHR, 87% were open. The overall VTE rate was 1.2%: 734 cases total (VTE) including 392 DVT, 259 PE, and 83 with both. Of VTE events, 59.1% occurred prior to discharge (median S93 5.0±5.5 days from operation) and 40.9% after discharge (median 16.0±7.2 days from surgery); p<0.05. Patients with VTE were older (62.1±13.1 vs 57.8±14.0 years) and had higher BMI (34.6±9.2 vs 33.4±9.1 kg/m2); both p<0.001. The following preoperative variables were associated with VTE (p≤0.05): diabetes (1.5% vs 1.2%), severe dyspnea (3.2% vs 1.1%), dependent functional status (3.7% vs 1.1%), ventilator dependence (6.6% vs 1.2%), COPD (1.9% vs 1.2%), pneumonia (5.6% vs 1.2%), CHF (3.6% vs 1.2%), hypertension (1.4% vs 1.1%), peripheral vascular disease (2.3% vs 1.2%), hemiplegia (2.7% vs 1.2%), stroke (3.0% vs 1.2%), cancer (2.6% vs 1.2%), open wound/infection (2.2% vs 1.2%), >10% loss of body weight (2.7% vs 1.2%), bleeding disorders (2.3% vs 1.2%), chemotherapy (2.4% vs 1.2%), radiotherapy (3.6% vs 1.2%), SIRS/sepsis (3.2% vs 1.2%), prior operation within 30 days (3.5% vs 1.2%), wound class ≥2 (1.9% vs 0.8%), ASA class IV/V (2.5% vs 1.2%), return to OR (4.5% vs 1.1%). Patients with VTE had longer operative and anesthesia time and an increased hospital stay, time from surgery to discharge, and 30-day mortality; all p<0.001. Multivariate regression demonstrated that prior stroke with neurologic deficit (OR 2.2; 95% CI: 1.5-3.3), bleeding disorder (OR 1.5; 95% CI: 1.1-2.0), sepsis (OR 1.8; 95% CI: 1.3-2.4), and wound classification (OR:1.3; 95% CI: 1.1-1.5) were associated independently with development of VTE; p<0.01. Conclusion: While the overall incidence of VTE in ventral hernia patients is low, patients at high risk for developing VTE may be anticipated pre- and post-operatively. High-risk patients may benefit from aggressive prophylactic measures, including post-discharge anti-coagulation, for prevention. P-12533 A large single center experience of lateral abdominal wall hernia repairs Warren J, Quigley L, Carbonell A, Cobb W Greenville Health System Lateral abdominal wall hernias may occur following a variety of procedures, including anterior spine exposure, urologic procedures, ostomy closures, or following trauma. Anatomically, these hernias are challenging and require a complete understanding of abdominal wall, interparietal and retroperitoneal anatomy for successful repair. Mesh placement requires extensive dissection of often unfamiliar planes, and fixation is difficult. We report our experience with open mesh repair of lateral abdominal wall hernias. Methods: A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database was performed to identify patients with a classification of lateral abdominal wall hernia. Review included patients which may have had a midline hernia component as well. Results: A total of 63 patients underwent 66 repairs. Defects were located subcostal (10), flank/iliac (32), and combined flank and midline incisional (23). Mean patient age was 57 years (range 13-78), with a mean BMI of 32 kg/m2 (range 19.0-59.1). Mean defect size was 80.4 cm2, with a mean greatest single dimension of 9.3 cm (range 2-25 cm). Retromuscular or interparietal repair was performed in 45.5%, preperitoneal in 33.3%, intraperitoneal in 12.1%, onlay in 6.1% and primary suture repair in 3%. A component separation was also performed on 28.8% of patients. The rate of surgical site occurrence was 50%, primarily seroma, while the surgical site infection rate was 15.2%. With a mean follow up of 10.7 months, 6 patients (9.1%) have documented recurrence. Conclusion: Synthetic mesh reconstruction of lateral wall hernias is challenging. Our experience demonstrates the safety and success of repair using synthetic mesh primarily in the retromuscular, interparietal or preperitoneal planes. S94 P-12536 Predicting post-operative wound complications using data and mathematical modeling Bradley J, Walters A, Colavita P, Williams K, Dacey K, Lincourt A, Augenstein V, Heniford B Carolinas Medical Center Introduction: Post-operative wound complications represent significant cost to individual patients and the healthcare system as a whole. Our aim was to develop an algorithm that mathematically identifies patients at risk for developing wound complications after open ventral hernia repair. Methods: Prospective, consecutive open ventral hernia repair data from 2007-2012, including demographics, comorbidities, operative details, complications, follow-up, and charges were analyzed. Wound complications included: cellulitis, wound separation, intra-abdominal abscess, wound and mesh infection. Multivariate logistic regression (MVR) model was used to calculate adjusted odds ratios of factors contributing to wound complications and develop a predictive mathematical algorithm. Results: A total of 531 OVHR were performed. Patients were 58% female with mean age of 56 years and BMI of 33.6kg/m2. Recurrent repairs represented 69%. Average defect and mesh size was 158 cm2 and 691 cm2, respectively. Concomitant panniculectomy, component separation, and advancement flaps were performed in 30%, 24%, and 46% of cases, respectively. Overall wound complication rate was 38.4%. Cellulitis (23.2%) was the most common, followed by wound infection (22.7%), wound separation (18.9%), mesh infection (2.7%), and intra-abdominal abscess (2.3%). MVR yielded the following risk factors for wound complications (with associated odds ratios and confidence intervals): diabetes 1.46 (0.90-2.37), smoking 1.20 (1.153.20), BMI per unit 1.07 (1.04-1.10), previous hernia repair 2.07 (1.29-3.32), infection at time of surgery 2.62 (1.13-6.10), advancement flaps 2.29 (1.49-3.51), and component separation 1.91 (1.193.08). A predictive, mathematical algorithm calculating percent risk of wound complications was developed with sensitivity and specificity exceeding 65%. This complex and lengthy algorithm is not included due to word limitation. Conclusion: Through the use of vast amounts of data, we have developed a predictive instrument to calculate the risk of wound complications after OVHR. This powerful tool will enable surgeons and patients to better assess preoperative risk and modify factors preoperatively to improve outcomes. P-12537 Surgical site occurrences of simultaneous panniculectomy and incisional hernia repair Warren J, Quigley L, Cobb W, Carbonell A Greenville Health System Background: Horizontal panniculectomy offers the advantage of wide exposure for hernia repair with elimination of excess skin and adiposity, yet at the expense of massive subcutaneous flap creation with its attendant risks. We report our experience of simultaneous panniculectomy and incisional hernia repair compared to a group of similar patients with hernia repair alone. Methods: A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database was performed for all patients undergoing open incisional hernia repair with simultaneous panniculectomy. A comparison was made to a matched cohort of hernia repairs without panniculectomy. Outcomes, including surgical site occurrences (SSO), surgical site infection (SSI) and recurrence were analyzed. Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S50-S97 Results: A total of 48 patients underwent simultaneous panniculectomy and incisional hernia repair with mesh. Mean BMI was 34.3 kg/m2 (range 15.0-57.8), with 35% having undergone prior bariatric surgery. Repair techniques included retromuscular (76%), preperitoneal (10%), intraperitoneal (6%), onlay (6%) and suture (2%) of patients. Mesh used was polypropylene (86%), biologic/bioabsorbable (12%), and polyester (2%). Component separation was performed in 29.6% of patients. There was no difference in surgical site occurrence (38.5% vs 38%; p =1.0) or surgical site infection (18.7% vs 12.4%; p=0.250) between the panniculectomy and non-panniculectomy group. With a mean follow up of 11.4 months, the recurrence rate was 4.2% in the panniculectomy group and 9.3% without panniculectomy (p=1.0). Conclusion: The addition of panniculectomy at the time of incisional hernia repair does not increase the incidence of wound complications, nor does it affect the likelihood of recurrence and thus should be strongly considered for patients with excessive abdominal pannus and incisional hernia. P-12538 Ventral hernia repair (vhr) in europe and the usa have similar surgical outcomes: an international prospective hernia study Oommen B, Wormer B, Kim M, Ross S, Walters A, Bradley J, Williams K, Augenstein V, Heniford B Carolinas Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Division of Gastrointestinal & Minimally Invasive Surgery Introduction: Globalization has dramatically increased the exchange of information around the world, and distribution of medical information has been at the forefront. We compare surgical technique and outcomes of VHR between the USA and Europe. Methods: A multinational, prospective database including 41 centers from the USA and Europe was queried for all VHR performed from October 2007 to June 2012. Demographics, operative details and outcomes were compared, including quality of life (QOL), which was measured using the Carolinas Comfort Scale (CCS). Standard statistical methods were used; a p<0.05 was significant. Results: There were 855 VHRs: 452 (53%) from Europe and 403 (47%) from the USA. In the USA there were more men (55% vs 47%), younger patients (55±13 vs 58±13 years), and laparoscopic repair (57% vs 36%); all p<0.05. Defects were larger in the USA for both OVHR (95±203 cm2 vs 85±104 cm2) and LVHR (102±103 cm2 vs 36±38cm2); all p<0.001. Fixation sutures (OVHR: 98% vs 93%; LVHR: 94% vs 53%), fixation glue (OVHR: 12% vs 4%; LVHR: 17% vs 1%), and fixation tacks (LVHR: 96% vs 90%) were all used more frequently in the USA (all p<0.001). When comparing outcomes of open VHR (OVHR) to laparoscopic VHR (LVHR), the USA and Europe were not statistically different in preoperative discomfort, postoperative pain medication, antibiotic use, DVT, pneumonia, surgical site infection, reoperation, recurrence, or mortality. At 1-month follow-up, the USA reported more postoperative discomfort (OVHR: 53% vs 26%; LVHR: 69% vs 31%) and movement limitation (OVHR: 46% vs 24%; LVHR: 59% vs 20%) compared to Europe (p<0.001). However, there were no differences in QOL between USA and Europe for both OVHR and LVHR at 6, 12, and 24 month follow-up. Conclusions: Patients undergoing VHR in the USA report more early post-operative pain and movement limitation and this may be due to differences in surgical repair techniques; however, long-term outcomes following VHR are similar in Europe and the USA. Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S50-S97 P-12540 Open retromuscular repair of parastomal hernias Warren J, Quigley L, Carbonell A, Cobb W Greenville Hospital System Background: A variety of techniques have been described for the repair of parastomal hernias, including re-siting with our without reinforcement, retromuscular open repair, and intraperitoneal mesh reinforcement using a key-hole or Sugarbaker technique. We report our experience with the open retromuscular repair of parastomal hernias. Methods: A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database was performed to identify patients undergoing parastomal hernia repair with or without concomitant midline incisional hernia repair as well. Results: Forty-eight patients underwent 49 hernia repairs. Mean age was 62 years (range 16-87) and mean BMI was 30.5 kg/m2 (range 14-51.4). Patients with ASA class 3 comprised 75% of the study population. Mean hernia area was 77.8 cm2 (range, 6.3-351.7) with a mean defect width of 7.6 cm (range, 2-16). The ostomy was resited through the mesh in 31 patients left in situ in 18. Thirteen patients had a concomitant midline incisional hernia and eight patients underwent prophylactic mesh reinforcement at the time of permanent stoma creation. Retromuscular repair was performed in 85.7% of patients, 42.9% included a component separation, and polypropylene mesh was utilized in 71.4% of cases. Surgical site occurrence was 43%, and surgical site infection (SSI) was 22.4%, including 3 patients with exposed mesh. None of the patients with exposed mesh required mesh removal. One patient in whom a colostomy was resited through the mesh developed an early SSI, and later went on to develop a colocutaneous fistula one year after surgery. This mesh was removed at the time of reoperation. With a mean follow up of 10.7 months, the hernia recurrence rate was 12.2%. Conclusion: Open retromuscular repair of parastomal hernias is a viable option with an acceptable recurrence rate and wound complications commensurate with the level of contamination of the surgery. P-12542 Large pore size and controlled mesh elongation, relevant predictors for mesh integration quality and shrinkage reduction Cobb W, Lomanto D, Alves A, Lecuivre J, Ladet S, Bayon Y, Weyhe D Hernia Center, Greenville Health Center Introduction: Macroporous meshes, as defined by a pore size >1mm, are preferred for abdominal wall hernia repair. Whether the improved tissue integration of meshes is more dependent on density versus porosity of the material has not been conclusively determined. The purpose of this study was to assess the comparative tissue integration based on quantitative histology of monofilament meshes in a minipig hernia model, mimicking a retromuscular mesh placement. Methods: Five, monofilament, polyester (polyethylene terephthlate; PET) meshes were implanted in an intramuscular position in minipigs. They differed in terms of weight (40 [LW] vs 90 [HW] g/m2), porosity (1x1-mm [small pores; SP] vs 2x3-mm [large pores; LP]) and structure (2D vs 3D): 2D-HW-SP; 2D-HW-LP; 2D-LW-SP; 2DLW-LP; 3D-HW-LP. Meshes were explanted at 3 and 21 weeks. Histologic analyses were performed on explanted specimens using a series of stainings, for quantitative evaluations of collagen, cell colonization and tissue ingrowth. S95 Results: At 3 and 21 weeks, 3D-HW-LP had statistically higher quantitative collagen counts than the other mesh constructs (p<0.001). Maturation of newly formed collagen was seen in all constructs, except 2D-LW-SP, with significant increase (p<0.05) in collagen I:III ratios at 21 weeks vs 3 weeks. Quantitative tissue ingrowth was statistically higher in the 3D-HW-LP and 2D-HW-LP constucts at both 3 and 21 weeks (p<0.001). The more stretchable - at 50 N prior to implantation-constructs (e.g. 2D-LW) showed a higher degree of shrinkage. Conclusion: Mesh integration into tissue is more dependent on increasing the porosity of meshes as opposed to reducing their density and appears to be optimal with three-dimensional meshes vs their two-dimensional counterparts. There is no benefit of mesh weight reduction in regards of tissue ingrowth. On the contrary a light weight mesh with high stretchability sounds at higher risk of shrinkage while not providing the adequate mechanical support. P-12543 Primary fascial closure with laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis Nguyen D, Liang M, Nguyen M, Wilson T, Hicks S, Kao L University of Texas Health Sciences Center at Houston Background: Laparoscopic repair of ventral hernias has grown in popularity. Typically this repair is done with mesh bridge technique that results in high rates of seroma, eventration (bulging), and patient dissatisfaction. In effort to reduce these complications, there is growing interest in the role of laparoscopic primary fascial closure with intra-peritoneal mesh placement. This systematic review seeks to evaluate the outcomes of closure of the central defect in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Methods: A literature search of PubMed, Cochrane databases and Embase was conducted using PRISMA guidelines. MINORS was used to assess the methodological quality. Primary outcome was hernia recurrence. Secondary outcomes were surgical site infection (SSI), seroma formation, bulging, and patient centered outcomes (patient satisfaction, chronic pain and functional status). Results: Pooled results from the non-closure studies (n=3) were compared to studies reporting closure (n=11). The closure group (n=1849) had a mean (range) age of 56 (19-100) and the follow-up period was 40 (0-141) months. For the non-closure group (n=255), the mean (range) age was 56 (26-91) and the follow-up period was 18 (0-108) months. Recurrences were reduced with closure (1.4% vs 10.2%). The pooled bulging rate was lower in the closure group (2.1% vs 69.4%). There was less SSI in the closure than non-closure group (1.8% vs 13.9%). Closure also had a decreased rate of seroma formation (4.6% vs 10.9%) when compared with non-closure. Patient satisfaction and functional status was higher in closure group than non-closure (8.8±0.4 vs 7.1±0.5 and 79±2 vs 71±2 [mean±SEM]). Conclusions: Closure of the central defect results in less recurrence, bulging, seroma and SSI. Patients with closure are also more satisfied with the results and have improved functional status. A randomized controlled trial to evaluate the role of closure of the central defect in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair is warranted. S96 P-12544 Ventral hernia risk score: a stratification score for evaluation of surgical site infection following open ventral hernia repair Liang M, Berger R, Li L, Nguyen M, Hicks S, Kao L University of Texas Health Sciences Center at Houston Background: Assessment of patient risk for surgical site infection (SSI) following open ventral hernia repair is challenging. Most indices are based on expert opinion, have not been validated, or are cumbersome. Herein, we aimed to develop a bedside tool to assess patient risk for SSI following open ventral hernia repair. Study design: A retrospective study of consecutive open ventral hernia repairs (n=888) at a single institution from 2000-2010 was performed. Rate of SSI were determined by chart review using strict CDC definition. Stepwise regression models were built to identify predictors of SSI and internally validated using bootstrapping. Odds ratios were converted to a point system and summed to create the Ventral Hernia Risk Score (VHRS) for SSI. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was used to compare the accuracy of the VHRS models against the National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance Risk Index and Ventral Hernia Working Group (VHWG) grade. Results: The rate of SSI was 22%. Predictors of SSI included concomitant procedures, dissection of skin flaps, American Society of Anesthesiologists class ≥3, wound class 4, and body mass index ≥40. The accuracy of the VHRS in predicting SSI exceeded National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance and VHWG grade. Conclusions: The VHRS identified patients at increased risk for SSI more accurately than the National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance scores and VHWG grade, and can be used to guide clinical decisions and patient counseling. P-12577 Is the use an intraperitoneal phisiomesh mesh using the Sugarbaker tecnique advisable to prevent of parastomal hernias? Barreiro J, Bear I, Abaitua G, Diez J, Florez L, Pachero R Hospital San Agustin Introduction: Parastomal hernias are a very common complication, ocurring in excess of 50%. Only a few studies deal with the prophylactic use the mesh to prevent parastomal hernia and show promising results. Methods: Twenty-nine patients undergoing elective rectal surgery with a permanet colostomy, one with an ileostomy and two needing surgical correction of pre -existing colostomy were enrolled in a prospective study. A specially designed mesh was implanted prophylactically using a physiomesh intraperitoneal mesh as described. Patients were followed for a median of 16 months, range 2-28, months through clinical examination every 3 months. Results: No infection or any other adverse effect was observed and no parastomal hernia or stoma protrusión were detected clinicaly. Twenty five patients had a rutine computed tomography after 12 months, which also confirmed the absence of hernia formation. Conclusions: The prophylactic use of a physiomesh mesh is a safe and effective procedure preventing stoma complications such as hernia formation or prolapse, at least in the short term. Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S50-S97 P-12579 Prevention strategy for abdominal wall hernia formation during open abdominal therapy Auer T Medical University Graz, Department of General Surgery Purpose: Open abdominal therapy (OAT) is mainly used for surgical treatments of peritonitis, damage control surgery after trauma and prevention from MOF for the abdominal compartment syndrome. Different methods have been used for temporary closing of the abdominal wall. Most of them do not prevent the muscular wall from shrinking, and after longer OAT-periods, only skin or mesh-graft closure remains as option. Methods: 2 commercial systems for abdominal negative pressure therapy (NPT) were used treating 40 patients. A lateral to medial musculo-fascial tension was created with application of flexible single stiches (by using “Vessel loops”) for temporary adaption of the abdominal wall. A vessel-loop running suture stapled to the skin edges was added for skin adaption. Findings: The wound sizes were mean L 26,5/W 15/D 4,7 cm. The mean duration of OAT was 17,5 days. Overall abdominal wall closure rate was 80%, encountered 2 of these patients needed bridging material due to traumatic destruction of large parts of the rectus muscles, the rate was 85%. 22 of these patients have reached the first postoperative year, 95% of them remained hernia free. 10 patients have actually reached the second post-operative year; all of them remained still hernia free. Conclusions: Musculo-fascial closure rates after OAT are published ranking from 12 to 24% before using NPT, 50 to 72% with NPT. Our data have reached a closure rate of 80% (85, 3%), and a stable result can be observed after 2 years follow up. Since long term results are very rarely published, this data can be used as a benchmark. Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S50-S97 P-12592 Evaluation of postoperative pain following laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a prospective randomized comparison of absorbable fixation versus conventional fixation Lepère M, Cobb W, Barthes T, Edwards C, Narula V, Scheuerlein H, Becker P Clinique St. Charles, La Roche Sur Yon, France Background: Chronic pain after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair is of concern to every parietal surgeon and may be related to the mesh fixation method. Absorbable fixation may reduce postoperative pain compared to metallic fixation. The resorbable AbsorbaTack™ fixation device (Covidien, Mansfield, MA) is intended to allow mesh stabilization until tissue ingrowth is achieved. Methods: This post-market, randomized, multicenter study assessed postoperative pain following hernia repair with either absorbable (AbsorbaTack™ fixation device) or conventional fixation (ProTack™ fixation device, Covidien). Primary measures included the 11-point Pain Intensity Numeric Rating Scale (PI-NRS), analgesic consumption, and the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ). Secondary measures included functional activity and hernia recurrence. Results: The intent-to-treat analysis included 110 ventral hernia patients (56 absorbable, 54 conventional). Baseline demographics were similar between groups. The median number of tacks used was 20 [range 10-90] and 21.5 [6-88] in the absorbable and conventional arms, respectively. Preoperative PI-NRS score was approximately 1 point higher (p=0.005) in ventral hernia patients receiving absorbable versus conventional; postoperative pain scores were similar between fixation methods. Twelve-month follow-up was completed in 74 patients (37 per group). There was a significant correlation between preoperative and postoperative pain at 1, 6, and 12-month followup; thus, pain data were expressed as change from baseline. Postoperative pain decrease from baseline was greater in the absorbable arm by the PI-NRS (p=0.01, 0.02, and 0.12) and MPQ (p=0.04, 0.03, 0.03) at 1, 6, and 12 months, respectively. There were no between-group differences in analgesic consumption. The cumulative 12-month hernia rate was 9% (absorbable) versus 4% (conventional; p=0.29). Conclusions: In patients undergoing ventral hernia repair, results show a better relief of postoperative pain and discomfort with the use of resorbable compared to conventional fixation while maintaining a comparable fixation safety. These findings will need to be confirmed in a larger study. S97 Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S98-S104 VIDEO ABSTRACTS Videos © Springer-Verlag 2014 V-103 Mesh cancer: Single-stage reconstruction of the abdominal wall in a patient presenting with mesh infection leading to squamous-cell carcinoma of the skin with bowel invasion and enteric fistula Birolini C, Utiyama E, Rasslan S University of São Paulo, School of Medicine Chronic mesh infection and enteric fistulas are serious complications of mesh repair; the reconstruction of the abdominal wall in patients presenting with enteric fistulas is a formidable challenge. The recommended surgical strategies include component separation techniques or staged approaches using absorbable or biological meshes despite its high recurrence rates and increased surgical site infection risks. Moreover, the coexistence of an infected mesh is usually seen as an absolute contra-indication to perform a primary reinforcement using synthetic mesh. In this video, we recorded the reconstruction of the abdominal wall with simultaneous onlay polypropylene mesh reinforcement on a 59 years old white male, presenting with a twenty-four years history of mesh infection degenerating into squamous cell carcinoma and bowel invasion, causing a high output entero-atmospheric fistula. On presentation, he had an impaired status; he had a large ulcer with exposed pieces of polyester mesh and open bowel in his anterior abdominal wall. There was Staphylococcus aureus growth in the cultures taken from a sinus. The operation included a complete resection of the tumor with removal of the infected mesh including an enterectomy, a partial colectomy and the tactical removal of the appendix. The midline was restored by primary approximation of the rectus muscles. The repair was reinforced using an onlay polypropylene mesh. The post-operative was uneventful, except for a minor skin breakdown. He was referred for adjuvant chemotherapy. He is followed since June 2012 and he has an anatomically normal and continent abdominal wall, without infection or tumor recurrence. V-104 Visceral resection and preoperative pneumoperitoneum as adjunctive maneuvers to hernia repair: Giant inguinal hernia Birolini C, Utiyama E, Rasslan S University of São Paulo, School of Medicine Giant ventral hernias are the ultimate challenge in hernia surgery. The treatment of hernias with loss of domicile has a considerable risk of abdominal compartment syndrome and high mortality. The adjunctive maneuvers to treat giant hernias include weight loss, progressive preoperative pneumoperitoneum (PPP) and component separation techniques, to increase the abdominal volume. Visceral resection, although controversial, is a valuable maneuver to consider in patients with massive hernias. In this video, we recorded the operation performed on a 63 years old white male, presenting with a giant right inguinal hernia. He had multiple comorbidities, including diabetes, hypertension, atrial fibrillation and a heart ejection fraction of 30%. The whole small bowel and the right and transverse colon were within the hernia sac, and the volume ratio was 44%. He was included in our PPP protocol and prepared during 20 days, to reach an 8,000 ml volume of inflated CO2. The operation included an extended right colectomy with ileum transverse anastomosis, a right orchiectomy and the resection of the exceeding scrotal skin. The inguinal hernia was treated by a double mesh reinforcement - Rives / Onlay repair using standard polypropylene mesh. The post-operative was uneventful, except for a reversible renal failure and urinary infection. He was discharged on the postoperative day 20 and he is being followed since May 2013. Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S98-S104 V-105 Visceral resection and preoperative pneumoperitoneum as adjunctive maneuvers to hernia repair: Giant ventral hernia Birolini C, Utiyama E, Rasslan S University of são Paulo, School of Medicine Giant ventral hernias are the ultimate challenge in hernia surgery. The treatment of hernias with loss of domicile has a considerable risk of abdominal compartment syndrome and high mortality. The adjunctive maneuvers to treat giant hernias include weight loss, progressive preoperative pneumoperitoneum (PPP) and component separation techniques, to increase the abdominal volume. Visceral resection, although controversial, is a valuable maneuver to consider in patients with massive hernias. In this video, we recorded the operation performed on a 54 years old white female, with a BMI of 41, presenting with a giant ventral hernia. She had multiple comorbidities, including diabetes, hypertension and chronic obstructive lung disease. The volume ratio was 30%. She was included in our PPP protocol and prepared during 15 days, to reach a 6,000 ml volume of inflated CO2. The operation included an extended right colectomy with ileum transverse anastomosis, a hysterectomy and a dermolipectomy. The abdominal wall was treated by primary closure of the main defect and reconstruction of the midline since she had other smaller defects along a previous laparotomy incision. A large onlay standard polypropylene mesh was used to reinforce the repair. Despite PPP and visceral resection, she developed SIRS, acute renal failure and pulmonary embolism, requiring ICU stay for hemodialysis and respiratory support during 10 days. She was discharged on the postoperative day 30, and she is being followed since March 2013. V-111 Ileal conduit and colostomy revision with two parastomal hernia repairs using synthetic mesh Petro C, Rosen M, Novitsky Y University Hospitals Case Medical Center Introduction: A 46-year-old male with a history of rectal cancer status-post neoadjuvant radiation and pelvic exenteration presented two years later with painful bulges adjacent to his end colostomy and ileal conduit. A CT scan confirmed bilateral parastomal hernias which were irreducible in clinic. Methods: The patient underwent revision of both stomas and repair of the parastomal defects using a posterior component separation, transversus abdominis muscle release (TAR) and retromuscular mesh sublay using synthetic mesh (polypropylene). The colostomy was fashioned at a new site in the left upper quadrant and the ileal conduit was revised at its original location, as it was not able to reach a new site. Results: The patient developed a superficial wound infection that required opening 6cm of his midline incision, 14 days of antibiotics and wet-to-dry dressing changes. At 3 and 6-month follow-up, his incisions have healed well and there are no signs of infection or recurrence. He reports significant improvement in his quality of life. Conclusion: This case highlights technical aspects important to successful stoma revision in the context of a posterior component separation and TAR. The use of synthetic mesh in contaminated surgical fields continues to be controversial. S99 V-114 Evolution of robotic ventral hernia repair Ballecer C, Prebil B Center for Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery My presentation will provide a video evolution of robotic ventral hernia repair in our general surgery practice. We started performing robotic ventral hernia bridging mesh repairs similar to conventional laparoscopic technique. We evolved into closing defects starting from small umbilical hernias to larger ventral and incisional hernias. Armed with the ability to close defects with relative ease and fearful of visceral adhesion to intraperitoneal onlay mesh, we can now place our mesh in a preperitoneal or retrorectus position as described by Rives−Stoppa. We can now also perform posterior component separation as described by A Carbonell et al for large incisional hernias as well as hernias with loss of domain. We believe that with the robot we can now do repairs that were traditionally reserved for open cases which results in not only a durable repair but most importantly our patients enjoy the well described benefits of minimal access surgery. The da Vinci robot is a tool we believe will transform minimally invasive surgery as we know it. The evolution of our technique for hernia repair provides the evidence. V-120 The use of ProGrip™ laparoscopic self-fixating mesh in TEP repair of inguinal hernia Boyd C Memorial Health University Medical Center The use of self-fixating mesh has been used extensively with great success in open inguinal hernia repair and offers the advantages of ease of use and the potential for less postoperative pain and decreased incidence of sensory nerve damage. A new self-fixating mesh designed for use in the laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia adds the advantage of eliminating the pain and costs associated with tack fixation. One surface of Laparoscopic ProGrip™ Mesh is covered with a fine collagen film that facilitates insertion, placement and positioning of the mesh. Secure fixation is assured by the five thousand absorbable microgrips. The self-fixating mesh eliminates the potential for recurrence under the inferior edge of the mesh posterior to the iliopubic tract. The video demonstrates a technique for mesh preparation and placement. The technique is simple, easy to use, and rapid. Two cases of laparoscopic TEP repair of inguinal hernia are presented that exhibit the details of the technique as well as the unique properties of the new mesh. S100 V-128 Laporascopic revisional repair of inguinal hernia Sadek R, Wassef A Rutgers University We present the case of a 65 year old male with a prior history of right inguinal hernia repair. Upon examination it was discovered that the patient had a recurrent right inguinal hernia. The normal course of action, according to medical literature, is to repair the inguinal hernia with an Open surgical approach. Entrance into a previously operated laparoscopic space is known for its difficulty due to obstructed surgical field of view caused by increases in adhesion and slight distortion of anatomy tissues during dissection. Yet, due to the patients concerns of scarring, the option of laparoscopic repair with a possible conversion to open procedure was made available. The Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair procedure proved successful, one year with no recurrence to date. The following video describes a new surgical technique to avoid obstructions of view, and ensure a safe efficient method of laparoscopic revisional hernia repair. V-143 Single port TEP without balloon and tacks performed under local anesthesia Wada N, Furukawa T, Kitagawa Y Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine Introduction: Laparoscopic hernia repair is considered to be minimally invasive. Pneumoperitoneum, however, usually requires muscle relaxation and general anesthesia. We have developed a novel technique for single-incision endoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) hernia surgery which is feasible even under local anesthesia. This procedure does not require the use of dissecting balloon or tacks for mesh fixation. Methods: From January 2012 to August 2013, a consecutive group of 44 patients with bilateral inguinal hernia was included. We used 0.5% lidocaine with epinephrine (1:100,000) as a local anesthetic. An incision of 30 mm in the lower abdomen was made and a wound protector with sealing silicon cap was placed. Three 5 mm trocars were inserted through the cap. A 5 mm flexible laparoscope was employed. A flat self-fixating mesh with resorbable microgrip was installed and spread over the entire myopectineal orifice of Fruchaud with enough overlap. Results: The age (mean±SD) was 67±10 and male sex was 91%. The operating time was 166±32 min. Total lidocaine dose was 114±27 mg. All patients were awake but sedated with intermittent intravenous pethidine (54±18 mg) and flunitrazepam (0.4±0.3 mg). Surgical complications were not observed except for 13 cases (29.5%) of minor seromas. Pneumoperitoneum due to peritoneal tear was occurred in 3 cases (6.8%) and managed with laparoscopic suturing devices. During median follow-up of 9 months, we observed no hernia recurrence. Conclusions: Short term outcomes were similar to those of conventional TEP or open hernia repair. Surgical invasiveness would have been reduced because the area of preperitoneal dissection is smaller in this procedure than in the umbilical approach. Postoperative recovery was rapid and patients can walk soon after surgery. This novel procedure may be a promising strategy to reduce the invasiveness of hernia repair. Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S98-S104 V-149 Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with ProGrip Laparoscopic self-fixating mesh Kenler A Yale New Haven Health The 15 x 10 cm ProGrip™ laparoscopic self-fixating mesh is brought onto the field. It is furled in such a manner that the anterior and posterior limbs are approximately the same length. The midline is marked with a blue marking pen as is the posterior limb. The mesh is then hydrated and placed through the camera port into the extraperitoneal space as it is pushed away from the surgical operator. It is fixed against the musculoskeletal compartment of the extraperitoneal space post mesh placement dissection of the lateral space is employed to allow the mesh to be unfurled posteriorly first. Employing the 5,000 microgrip technology, allowing fixation posterior to the iliopubic tract. The indirect hernia sac is noted proximal to the posterior limb of the mesh. Subsequently, using a curved dissecting instrument and a raking motion, the anterior limb of the mesh is unfurled. Complete coverage of the potential direct space, femoral space, and internal ring is achieved with coverage and fixation posterior to the iliopubic tract. The indirect hernia sac is reduced proximal to the mesh. The pneumoretroperitoneum is released. Nothing is allowed to go underneath or to the side of the mesh. The bulb insufflator is used to release the structural balloon. The anterior fascial defect at the level of the umbilicus is closed with a running 0 Polysorb suture. A 4-0 Biosyn subcuticular suture is used to reapproximate the skin edges. Indermil and Steri-Strips are used for the skin edges and to seal the wounds. Tegaderm™ dressings are placed on all of the incisions. Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S98-S104 V-151 Laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) for epigastric hernia and rectus abdominis diastasis repair: a novel technique Arias F, Herrera G, Cortés N, Pozo M, Arango J University Hospital Fundación Santa Fé de Bogotá Introduction: Diastasis recti presents commonly in childbearing women and can persist after delivery, becoming symptomatic even years later with disability to perform physical activity and altered cosmesis. Traditionally surgical repair has been controversial and approached through abdominoplasty. Laparoscopic surgery has become a widely used technique for the management of abdominal wall defects. We describe a novel technique for repair of diastasis recti through Laparo-Endoscopic Single-site Surgery (LESS). Methods and procedures: A 44-year-old woman with two prior pregnancies presented with a painful abdominal mass without obstructive symptoms. A 6 cm non-incarcerated epigastric hernia was diagnosed and manually reduced. An abdominal ultrasonography showed a 31 mm epigastric hernia and diastasis recti of 7 cm. Three years prior she had undergone an umbilical hernia repair which failed. Results: A 2 cm epigastric defect was identified with a 7 cm diastasis recti extending from the xiphoid process to the umbilicus. A hybrid LESS device (wound retractor and latex glove) was used. After lysing omental adhesions to the abdominal wall, pre-peritoneal space was dissected until the posterior rectus sheath was identified bilaterally. Plication of the posterior rectus sheath was achieved using continuous non-absorbable 2-0 barbed-suture. A 15 x 10 cm polyester collagen-covered mesh was placed and secured using Covidien AbsorbaTacks™. Complete overlap of ventral hernia and entry port was achieved. The patient had an uneventful postoperative recovery and was successfully discharged. Conclusion (S): Diastasis recti is common specially after pregnancy, and frequently occurs in association with other wall defects. Open techniques have been recommended for this condition when surgery is indicated with potential increased wound morbidity. We describe a novel LESS technique for the management of diastasis recti with improved cosmesis. Further studies should determine long-term outcomes of this approach. V-171 Robot assisted incisional diaphragmatic hernia repair from lvad explantation: a video presentation Srinivasa D, Wilson T UT Houston Department of Surgery Purpose: Diaphragmatic hernia after Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD) explantation and orthotopic heart transplant has an incidence of between 5 and 15%1. Although primary diaphragmatic closure at the time of initial surgery has reduced the incidence, incisional diaphragmatic hernias remain a morbid complication, oftentimes requiring further surgery for definitive repair2. Current standard of care includes laparoscopic repair with a polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) mesh and interrupted sutures with tacking reinforcement as necessary3. Outcomes are favorable but there is little long-term data on recurrence. Furthermore, tacking reinforcement carries risks since structures behind the diaphragm cannot be visualized. Here, we describe robotic assisted primary closure of the diaphragmatic defect with Goretex mesh reinforcement. S101 Methods: We performed a robotic assisted diaphragmatic hernia repair in a patient with an incisional hernia from LVAD explantation and orthotopic heart transplant. 5 port sites were used and the robot was utilized for the entirety of the case. After careful lysis of adhesions, the hernia sac was dissected and the diaphragmatic defect isolated. This was primarily repaired with 0-Ethibond interrupted sutures. A Gore-Tex mesh was then sutured in an overlay fashion with running 0-Gore-Tex suture. Results: The patient tolerated the procedure well and there were no complications. The patient is currently free of recurrence. Conclusion: Primary repair of incisional diaphragmatic hernias with mesh reinforcement can be safely performed with robot assisted surgery. V-210 Abdominal wall reconstruction with bilateral parastomal hernia repairs Petro C, Criss C, Novitsky Y University Hospitals Case Medical Center Introduction: 74M with a history of T4 rectal cancer in the setting of ulcerative colitis now 5 years status-post neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation followed by a pelvic exenteration and total abdominal colectomy. He has since developed bulges adjacent to his ileal conduit and end ileostomy which are painful and cause intermittent obstructive symptoms. CT scan demonstrates bilateral parastomal hernias. Methods: The plan was to complete an open abdominal wall reconstruction with a posterior components separation, transversus abdominis muscle release (TAR), biological mesh (porcine dermis) sublay, and revision of both ostomies. The main teaching point involves careful alignment of the ostomy defects in the posterior fascial layer, mesh, and anterior fascial layer so as not to compromise the ostomy or conduit. Results: The post-operative course was notable for extubation on post-operative day 1, Foley removal from the ileal conduit on day 14, and normal stoma function bilaterally by discharge at day 16. There was a portion of wound necrosis with a subcutaneous hematoma that required packing and daily dressing changes. This has now entirely healed and he continues to increase his activity level after 6 months. Conclusion: Bilateral parastomal hernias in the context of a previous pelvic exenteration are a difficult problem. Revision of both stomas with TAR and mesh sublay is our recommended approach for longterm durability. S102 Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S98-S104 V-213 New technique for laparoscopic closure of incisional hernias using unidirectional barbed suture V-11182 Reconstruction of a large hiatal hernia after gastric bypass with a Gore BioA matrix Betancourt A, Rosales-Velderrain A, Lo Menzo E, Szomstein S, Rosenthal R Cleveland Clinic Florida Birk D Surgical Department, Protestant Hospital Zweibruecken Introduction: Incisional hernia is a common long-term complication of abdominal surgery and is estimated to occur in 3% to 13% of laparotomy incisions. Laparoscopic incisional hernia repair (LIHR) is fast becoming the standard approach in the repair of abdominal wall hernias. Primary closure of the hernia defects is recommended with no absorbable sutures. This practice may improve cosmesis and prevent undesirable complications, such as seroma formation. We present a new technique of laparoscopic insicional hernia primary closure using a unidirectional barded suture. Material: A new type of suture material that was originally developed to be used for wound closure in orthopedic and plastic surgery was utilized. Unidirectional suture contains barbs along its length. This feature makes possible bidirectional fixation that provides distribution of the tension across the two edges of the tissue and eliminates the need to tie knots maintaining tight tissue approximation. Method: A 58 years old man, with surgical history of laparocopic cholecystectomy in 2001, presenting an incisional which has progressivelly grown in size. A laparoscopic repair was perfromed, the hernia defect was closed laparoscopically with the aid of running unidirectional barbed suture and reinforced with the use of 15 cm composite polyester mesh (polyester and porcine collegen) which was secured with 4 transfascial sutures PDS 0 placed at equal distance from each other. Finally the perimeter of the mesh between sutures was fiexed to the under surface of the abdominal wall utilizing the titanium tacking device. The recovery of the patient was uneventful and was discharge at the postoperative day 1, without complications. V-218 Mini laparoscopic TAPP herniorraphy with 3D mesh and cyanoacrylate Loss A, Marins C, Vinhas L, Silveira P, Kanaan E, Magalhães S Brazilian The videolaparoscopic technique has become more popular among patients and surgeons. Tecnology is beeing used to perform surgeries even more complex with less agressiveness. The MILS technique (mini incision lapaoscopic surgery) uses trocars of 2 and 3 mm. The authors present a video of TAPP inguinal herniorraphy performed by the MILS technique using a 3D light mesh, and its fixation with a synthetic glue n-butyl cyanoacrylate (Glubran), wich polimerizes very quickly. These materials make the surgery easier, faster and safer, with less pain and less chances of neural lesions, besides the cosmetic advantages of the MILS technique With the increase of obesity the number of bariatric operations is also rising. Obesity being a risk factor, many of those patients also suffer from a hiatal hernia. Either during or in the course of the treatment it may become necessary to repair the hiatal defect. Therefore further interest should be given to this special patient group. The submitted video shows the operation of a 45 year old male who had received a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass 2 years prior to this operation. In this time period he lost 80 kg body weight and reduced the BMI from 52 to 29. However, he developed increasing symptoms of regurgitation and retrosternal pain. Upper GI Endoscopy revealed a large hiatal hernia with enlargement and dislocation of the gastric pouch into the thorax. The laparoscopic operation describes the reduction of the hernia sack, the excision of a large mediastinal lipoma followed by the closure of the crura with sutures. Since augmentation of the hiatal closure is strongly advocated in large hiatal defects a U-shaped Gore BioA matrix was deployed and sutured ventral onto the diaphragm. This three dimensional resorbable matrix allows rapid ingrowth of collagen but does not lead to penetration or ingrowth like permanent meshes may. At end of the hiatal reconstruction the gastric pouch is trimmed to allow better passage into the jejunal loop. Hiatal surgery after bariatric procedures will increase. Understanding the altered anatomy and the underlying problems of obesity thus offering successful treatment concepts will become more important to hernia surgeons. V-12210 TEP repair in large scrotal hernia Meyer A USP Background: Laparoscopic repair of scrotal hernias is often a difficult endeavor to successfully complete. The longstanding nature of these hernias often results in significant adhesions and anatomic distortion of the inguinal floor. These two issues make reduction of the hernia arduous and subsequent reinforcement of the parietal sac difficult. Here, we describe techniques to increase the chances of success when attempting laparoscopic repair of scrotal hernias and to achieve a robust preperitoneal repair of incarcerated scrotal hernias. Patient and method: Male, 59 years, body mass index of 28 kg/m (2), 2 years after undergoing right open hernia repair and bilateral varicocele surgery. Left Large incarcerated scrotal hernia. The Retzius space was developed early in the procedure and hernia sac contents were reduced using a maneuver with the hands. Results: The operative time was 50 minutes without drainage. The postoperative hospital stay was less than 12 hours. There were no complications. Conclusion: In cases where a large scrotal hernia may be difficult or dangerous to reduce laparoscopically, immediate conversion to an open repair may not be necessary. Laparoscopic TEP repair was successful with excellent outcome in the management of massive incarcerated groin hernia in the hands of an experienced laparoscopic surgeon. Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S98-S104 S103 V-12231 Laparoscopic repair of suprapubic ventral hernia after prior operative fixation of pubic symphysis disruption V-12488 Totally laparoscopic vesico cutaneus fistula resection as a rare complication of ipom incisional hernia repair Admire J, Van Sickle K UTHSC San Antonio Real Romo Z, Moreno M, Castillo G, Franklin M Texas Endosurgery Institute The patient is a 33 year old male who was treated for a traumatic pubic bone disruption in October of 2012. He subsequently developed a suprapubic ventral hernia through his Pfannenstiel incision site. He was referred to the General Surgery clinic for his hernia that was causing him discomfort, dysuria and urinary urgency. Given the location and size of the hernia (11 cm x 18 cm) and possibility of orthopedic hardware obstructing targets for potential sutures and tacks, this was felt to be a difficult case. An open separation of components repair was considered but was not felt to be the best option, and a laparoscopic pre-peritoneal approach was performed. Four trocars were placed and the peritoneal cavity was entered. The pelvic preperitoneal space was then created with sharp dissection in a manner identical to a Transabdominal Preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal herniorraphy. In the course of this dissection, a metallic plate from the previous operation was noted reinforcing the pubic bone. A large parietex mesh was then affixed with at least 4cm overlap on each edge, with the superior and lateral edges secured to the ventral abdominal wall with PTFE suture and reinforced with tacks. A vicryl suture was placed in the center of the mesh to prevent sagging and improve visualization at the inferior aspect for fixation. Consistent with pre-operative concerns, the metal hardware in the pelvis prevented the feasibility of tack or suture fixation at the inferior margin of the defect. Fixation in the pelvis was secured with fibrin glue (off label use). The patient ultimately did well post-operatively although he did develop a small abdominal wall seroma, which resolved spontaneously. At 11 day and 2 month follow-up, no recurrence was appreciated and his abdominal wall function is intact. Introduction: A vesico-cutaneous fistula is an abnormal congenital or acquired opening that connects the urinary tract to the skin surface. They usually appear after prolonged suprapubic catheterization or any other procedure on the anterior vesical wall. Case report: A 62 year old male with history of sigmoidectomy and Hartmann’s procedure for complicated diverticulitis, and latter incisional hernia which was repaired laparoscopically with polypropylene mesh, three years ago. He was admitted with urine draining from the stoma scar. A fistulogram and a CT scan were completed, they revealed a 7cm length path connecting the stoma scar on the left inferior quadrant of the abdomen to the bladder. Cystoscopy was normal. The fistula was canalized with a Franklin® colangiography catheter, the fistulous path was identified by careful dissection of preperitoneum space, and then totally removed. In the same procedure the prosthetic material (meshoma) was identified proximal to the bladder and it was removed. Discussion: Usually the etiological factors include trauma, radiation, vesical diverticula, obstetric complications, orthopedic surgery, radiation among others. Enterocutaneous fistula is a known late complication of prosthetic mesh repair of incisional hernia and is usually due to chronic erosion of bowel by mesh placed in direct contact with intestinal loops both in open and laparoscopic procedures, nevertheless, vesico-cutaneous fistula associated to mesh repair has not been widely described in literature. Conclusions: Meshoma and complications related to the migration of the plug and mesh are a problem, but their incidence is very low. These are more frequently encountered after laparoscopic hernia repair. Laparoscopic approach offers a minimally invasive procedure with low morbidity and favorable outcome. Nevertheless, a vesicocutaneus fistula secondary to a laparoscopic mesh repair is, to our knowledge, never been reported in literature. V-12485 Prevention of the Stoma Site Hernia After Laparoscopic Reversal Procedure Hernandez M, Franklin M, Romo Z, Castillo G Texas Endosurgery Institute Background and objectives: Stomas represent an important cause of morbidity. Studies show that the incidence of incisional hernia at the site of the stoma closure is up to 30% at a mean time of 7 months after stoma closure. Currently, there are no studies regarding the prevention of an incisional hernia after stoma closure. The aim of this study is to demonstrate that laparoscopic placement of mesh at the time of a stoma closure is feasible, safe and is associated with decreased incidence. Methods: We performed a prospective study at the Texas Endosurgery Institute between January 2007 and September 2013 of all the patients that underwent laparoscopic assisted stoma closure. Results: A total of 114 patients underwent elective laparoscopic assisted closure of a stoma with placement mesh at stoma site. Population included was 70 males and 44 females with a mean age 63.5 years (38-88 years) and a mean BMI of 28.2 kg/m2 (19.3-44.5). 71 of the patients had a loop ileostomy and 43 colostomy. Surgeries were performed with no conversions in a mean operative time of 102 minutes (35-260) and an estimated blood loss of 53 cc (10-300). Polyester, polypropylene and biologic meshes were place intraperitoneally. Mean length of hospital stay was 6.9 days. Conclusion: We have demonstrated that mesh can be safely and successfully placed to reinforce the stoma site after closure. We had no major full thickness wound issues, no mesh complications and zero occurrence rate at follow up of 19 months. S104 Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S98-S104 V-12491 Primary suture technique in 758 midline hernia repair V-12567 Laparoscopic Repair of a Spiegel Hernia Ross N Shouldice Clinic De Luca C, Franca F, Marques T Brazil Introduction: The Shouldice hospital remains one of the last battle grounds to champion the pure tissue repair for all kinds of abdominal wall hernias. Although general surgeons operate on a great number of these hernias, large series are absent from the literature with the largest series studied 146 of such patients. We carried a review of a series of 758 midline abdominal wall hernias performed between 2003 and 2013, at the Shouldice hospital by one of the surgeons (the author). Method: Those cases reviewed were divided into 430 umbilical repair, 74 Paraumbilical, 137 epigastric, and 106 trocar site incisional hernias. Using primary suturing technique with double breasting with continuous layers of 2/0 polypropylene as the first two layers, and 32 gauges stainless steel wire suture material for the second, we followed these patients five weeks, one year, and annually afterwards. Results: Only 3 reported recurrences over 10 years period were found, representing a 0.003% rate, surgical site infection in only 3 cases with the same rate of 0.003%. The size of the defects ranges between 0.5 cm-6 cm with a mean of 2.6 cm. The age group ranges between 16-83 years old, with mean of 44 years old. The mean BMI was 24.9 with 80% male predominance. Conclusion: We believe that primary suturing technique using these two materials with double breasting proofs to be the near to the ideal method of closure of such midline hernias. A video presentation is enclosed with this abstract to elucidate the technique described. Spigelian Hernias are rare abdominal wall hernias. Approximately 1.000 cases have been reported in the literature and their incidence is estimated to be less then 2% off all abdominal wall hernias. These hernias occur through the spigelian aponeuroses which is composed of the aponeuroses of the transverse abdominal muscle that lies between the lateral edge of the rectus muscle and the linea semilunaris. We present the case of a 47 years old male patient with pain in the right side for a year without a wall bulge and the ultrasound can identify the defect about 1,8 cm in the semilunar line. A laparoscopic approach of this case was decided. We reduced the sac and its contents. We closed the defect using a Phisiomesh and fixed with absorbable tackers (Securestrap). The surgical time was 30minutes and the patient was discharged the next day. We concluded that the Laparoscopic approach is safe and with goods result and great acceptance. V-12524 Strangulated inguinal hernia repair by trans abdominal pre peritoneal laparoscopic approach Morrell A, Cavazolla L, Furtado M, Malcher F, Farah F, Meyer A, Costas M Brazil Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair have become a popular procedure for not only bilateral and recurrent hernia but also for unilateral inguinal hernia. Recent studies have reported successful reduction and repair of chronic and/or even acute incarcerated inguinal hernias by the laparoscopic approach, yet this procedure is still controversial and strangulated inguinal hernias has traditionally been considered a contraindication for the laparoscopic approach. We present a case of a patient who underwent laparoscopic transperitoreal (TAPP) repair for a strangulated inguinal hernia showing that this technique it’s possible in acute cases and has some advantages. Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S105-S110 ABSTRACTS Author Index © Springer-Verlag 2014 Abaitua G, P-12577, S96 Abbas M, P-12218, S77 Abdalla B, P-124, S54 Abdalla R, IP-12591, S32, IP-118, S44, P-101, S50, P-124, S54, P-125, S54 Abdelsaatar J, FP-133, S34 Abston E, FP-116, S12 Admire J, V-12231, S103 Agra A, P-224, S70 Agredano-Jiménez R, P-12509, S87 Aguilar Martí M, P-107, S51, P-108, S52, P-112, S52 Aihni A, P-12525, S92 Aka H, P-145, S55 Alaedeen D, P-12487, S82 Alban M, P-185, S61, P-11928, S74, P-12209, S75 Alfonso J, P-110, S52 AlJamal Y, FP-133, S34, P-12486, S82 Allen W, P-203, S66 Alvarez J, FP-12213, S26 Alvarez R, P-10550, S72 Álvarez-Villaseñor A, P-12509, S87 Alves A, P-12542, S95 Alves L, P-224, S70 Amarante G, P-12217, S77 Ami K, P-190, S62 Amid P, IP-12557, S16 Anania S, P-174, S58 Ando M, P-190, S62 Arai K, P-190, S62 Arango J, V-151, S101 Arias F, V-151, S101 Armstrong B, FP-214, S33 Ashfaq A, P-12224, S79 Asman A, P-203, S66 Auer T, P-12579, S96 Aufenacker T, FP-178, S26 Augenstein V, IP-140, S9, FP-209, S14, FP-12493, S24, FP-12520, S25, FP-12503, S49, P-195, S64, P-217, S69, P-12235, S81, P-12492, S83, P-12522, S91, P-12523, S91, P-12527, S92, P-12529, S93, P-12530, S93, P-12536, S94, P-12538, S94 Avci M, FP-126, S11 Azoury S, P-169, S57 Baalman S, P-12525, S92 Bakaki P, FP-144, S48 Ballecer C, V-114, S99 Barber Millet S, P-107, S51, P-108, S52 Barber S, P-127, S54 Bardella R, P-206, S67 Barreiro J, P-12577, S96 Barthes T, P-12592, S97 Bates A, P-173, S58 Bau R, P-216, S68 Baucom R, FP-10933, S47, P-203, S66 Bauer J, FP-182, S24 Bayon Y, P-147, S56, P-12542, S95 Bear I, P-12577, S96 Becker P, P-12592, S97 Belgrade J, P-192, S63, P-193, S63, P-196, S64, P-11732, S74, P-12180, S74, P-12221, S78 Bellón J, P-147, S56 Beltrame M, P-174, S58, P-179, S59 Belyansky I, FP-12493, S24, FP-12520, S25, IP-136, S46 Bencina F, P-11928, S74 Berends F, FP-148, S34 Berger R, P-12544, S96 Bernstein M, P-122, S53 Berrevoet F, P-12483, S81 Betancourt A, V-213, S102 Bhanot P, IP-12548, S9 Birk D, V-11182, S102 S106 Birolini C, P-102, S51, V-103, S98, V-104, S98, V-105, S99 Bittner J, IP-12598, S20, IP-12564, S28 Björk S, P-187, S61 Bleichrodt R, FP-178, S26 Bökkerink W, P-222, S69 Bonafé Diana S, P-107, S51, P-108, S52, P-112, S52 Bonjer H, FP-11345, S25 Born H, P-12214, S76 Boyd C, IP-12597, S19, V-120, S99 Bradley J, FP-209, S14, FP-12493, S24, P-12235, S81, P-12492, S83, P-12522, S91, P-12527, S92, P-12529, S93, P-12530, S93, P-12536, S94, P-12538, S94 Brandsma H, FP-178, S26 Bringman J, P-12229, S80 Bringman S, P-12229, S80 Brunt L, IP-12552, S36 Bryan N, FP-12574, S14 Burton P, P-217, S69 Campanelli G, IP-12555, S41 Carbonell A, IP-156, S9, FP-182, S24, IP-158, S43, P-12515, S89, P-12528, S92, P-12533, S93, P-12537, S94, P-12540, S95 Carbonell Tatay F, P-107, S51, P-108, S52, P-112, S52 Carrasco J, P-185, S61, P-11928, S74, P-12209, S75 Carreño-Saenz O, P-107, S51, P-108, S52, P-112, S52 Carter J, P-181, S60 Castillo G, P-12227, S80, V-12485, S103, V-12488, S103 Cauwenberge S, P-12484, S82 Cavallo J, FP-12596, S10, P-12511, S88 Cavazolla L, P-12216, S76, V-12524, S104 Cavazzola L, FP-12504, S11, IP-12572, S19 Cavazzola LT, P-216, S68 Ceconnello I, P-101, S50 Cejnar S, P-12214, S76 Cense H, FP-148, S34 Chávez-Tostado M, P-12509, S87 Cheesborough J, P-176, S59, P-177, S59, P-12521, S91 Chen D, IP-165, S15 Cheng A, P-12218, S77 Cheung C, FP-126, S11 Chihara N, P-9207, S71, P-12518, S90 Chowdhury N, P-12511, S88 Christian D, P-223, S70 Chui P, P-225, S70 Chung P, P-122, S53 Cingolani P, P-12513, S89, P-12514, S89 Clancy T, P-223, S70 Clarke J, P-100, S50 Cleven S, P-12483, S81 Cobb W, FP-182, S24, IP-164, S40, P-12515, S89, P-12528, S92, P-12533, S93, P-12537, S94, P-12540, S95, P-12542, S95, P-12592, S97 Cohen E, FP-115, S48 Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S105-S110 Colavita P, FP-12493, S24, FP-12520, S25, P-217, S69, P-12235, S81, P-12536, S94 Colivita P, IP-140, S9 Conway M, P-192, S63, P-193, S63, P-196, S64, P-11732, S74, P-12180, S74, P-12221, S78 Conze K, IP-12566, S28 Coombs N, P-181, S60 Copsta T, P-101, S50 Cortés N, V-151, S101 Costa R, P-124, S54, P-125, S54 Costas M, FP-12504, S11, P-12216, S76, V-12524, S104 Criss C, FP-131, S12, FP-200, S33, FP-130, S47, FP-132, S49, FP-144, S48, V-210, S101 Criss CR, P-195, S64 Cuenca A, FP-12213, S26 Cunnigaiper N, P-198, S65 Dacey K, P-217, S69, P-12530, S93, P-12536, S94 Daoud I, P-11555, S73 Data J, P-12507, S87 Davenport D, P-205, S67, P-12508, S87 De Deyne P, P-8224, S71 de Freitas L, P-212, S68 de Goede B, P-168, S57 De La Cruz C, P-169, S57 de Lange de Klerk E, FP-11345, S25 De Luca C, V-12567, S104 De Silva G, FP-121, S49 Deeken C, IP-12549, S27, P-12511, S88, P-12525, S92 Deerenberg E, FP-148, S34 DeLozier K, P-12501, S86 Derwin K, P-12501, S86 Devaja A, P-117, S53 Dhanasopon A, P-169, S57 Diaz-Elizondo A, P-129, S54 Diaz-Hernandez J, P-12217, S77 Diez J, P-12577, S96 Dijk SM, P-208, S67 Dijkhuizen F, FP-148, S34 Dillemans B, P-12484, S82 Dissanaike S, P-11228, S73 Doerhoff C, IP-12561, S38, P-12229, S80 Dominguez C, P-185, S61, P-11928, S74 Dominquez M, P-12209, S75 Dumanian G, FP-109, S13, P-176, S59, P-177, S59, P-12521, S91 Dunkin B, FP-12574, S14 Dunn R, FP-186, S23, P-170, S57 Dwars B, FP-11345, S25 Earle D, IP-12547, S27 Edwards C, P-12592, S97 Ehrenfeld J, FP-10933, S47 Elegbede A, P-219, S69 Elliott H, FP-200, S33 Fajardo M, P-110, S52 Falasco G, P-12208, S75 Farah F, FP-12504, S11, P-12216, S76, V-12524, S104 Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S105-S110 Farley D, FP-133, S34, P-12486, S82 Felix E, IP-153, S41 Fernandes V, P-206, S67 Fernández E, P-110, S52 Fernandez-Moure J, FP-12574, S14 Fernando I, P-12211, S75, P-12513, S89 Feryn,T, P-12484, S82 Feyerherd P, P-146, S56 Florez L, P-12577, S96 Floyd D, P-204, S66 Franca F, V-12567, S104 Franklin M, P-12227, S80, P-12510, S88, V-12485, S103, V-12488, S103 Franz M, IP-12546, S43 Frelich M, FP-116, S12 Frisella M, P-12511, S88 Frisells M, P-12525, S92 Fuentes-Orozco C, P-12509, S87 Furtado M, FP-12504, S11, P-12216, S76, V-12524, S104 Furukawa T, P-9903, S72, V-143, S100 Ganno H, P-190, S62 Garcia D, P-206, S67 García Pastor P, P-107, S51, P-108, S52, P-112, S52 Garcia R, P-124, S54, P-125, S54 García-Moreno F, P-147, S56 García-Rentería J, P-12509, S87 Gil-Gallardo G, P-129, S54 Gilbert A, FP-113, S35, P-142, S55, P-12234, S81 Gillespie B, P-12226, S80 Gitahy A, P-212, S68 Giunippero A, P-174, S58 Goderich Lalán J, P-110, S52 Goede B, P-208, S67 Goede M, FP-172, S48 Goldblatt M, FP-116, S12, IP-162, S19, FP-182, S24, IP-163, S39 Gónzalez-Ojeda A, P-12509, S87 Gorganchian F, P-174, S58, P-179, S59 Gould J, FP-116, S12 Greenberg C, FP-115, S48 Greenberg J, IP-160, S15, IP-12580, S38, FP-115, S48, P-219, S69 Grossi J, P-216, S68, P-224, S70 Gruber-Blum S, P-134, S55 Guajardo-Nieto D, P-129, S54 Gustafson M, P-11555, S73 Haggerty S, P-12497, S85 Haluck R, P-9667, S71 Hammond J, P-12229, S80, P-12495, S84 Hanashiro N, P-145, S55 Hanna M, P-11228, S73 Hansson B, FP-178, S26 Harlaar J, FP-148, S34 Harold K, IP-12550, S19, IP-12594, S37, P-12224, S79 Hasegawa T, P-191, S63 S107 Hata T, P-191, S63 Heniford B, IP-140, S9, FP-209, S14, FP-12493, S24, FP-12520, S25, FP-12503, S49, P-195, S64, P-217, S69, P-12235, S81, P-12522, S91, P-12523, S91, P-12527, S92, P-12529, S93, P-12530, S93, P-12536, S94, P-12538, S94 Hernandez M, P-12227, S80, P-12489, S83, P-12510, S88, V-12485, S103 Herrera G, V-151, S101 Heuvel B, FP-11345, S25 Hicks S, P-12543, S95, P-12544, S96 Hodgman E, P-106, S51 Hofman A, P-168, S57 Holzman M, FP-10933, S47 Hooks W, P-223, S70 Hope W, IP-12545, S16, P-223, S70 Hori T, P-184, S61 Huerta C, P-12209, S75 Hui X, P-169, S57 Ignotz R, FP-186, S23, P-170, S57 Imazu H, P-197, S65 Imazu Y, P-197, S65 Inaba T, P-184, S61 Iqbal A, FP-12213, S26 Iserte Hernandez J, P-107, S51, P-108, S52, P-112, S52 Ivarsson M, P-187, S61 Jackson T, P-9667, S71 Jacob B, IP-12595, S22, IP-141, S41, P-173, S58, P-225, S70 Jacobsen G, FP-182, S24, IP-154, S36, IP-155, S45 Jagan B, P-198, S65 Jeekel J, FP-207, S13, IP-12570, S42, P-150, S56, P-168, S57, P-208, S67 Jenkins M, P-181, S60 Jones P, P-12229, S80, P-12495, S84 Jones R, FP-172, S48 Juza R, P-9667, S71 Kaiser J, FP-10933, S47 Kalish E, P-192, S63, P-193, S63, P-196, S64, P-11732, S74, P-12180, S74, P-12221, S78 Kanaan E, V-218, S102 Kanth R, P-199, S65 Kao L, P-12543, S95, P-12544, S96 Kasten S, P-12226, S80 Kaufmann R, P-150, S56 Kazemier G, P-168, S57 Keating J, P-12499, S85, P-12507, S87 Kenler A, V-149, S100 Kercher K, IP-12553, S21, P-217, S69 Keus F, FP-126, S11 Kim M, FP-209, S14, FP-12493, S24, FP-12520, S25, FP-12503, S49, P-195, S64, P-12492, S83, P-12523, S9, P-12527, S92, P-12530, S93, P-12538, S94 Kingsnorth A, IP-12599, S30 Kitagawa Y, P-9903, S72, V-143, S100 S108 Kleinrensink G, P-208, S67 Klick J, P-12220, S78 Klobusicky P, P-146, S56 Koch A, P-11073, S73, P-12212, S76, P-12214, S76 Koeslag L, FP-126, S11 Koning G, FP-126, S11 Kulacoglu H, P-188, S62 Kulig J, P-9733, S72, P-12490, S83 Kumar S, P-189, S62 Kuniyoshi F, P-145, S55 Kuwada T, FP-220, S35 Kwon E, P-12219, S77 Ladet S, P-12542, S95 Lalán J, P-10824, S73 Landman B, P-203, S66 Lange J, FP-207, S13, P-150, S56, P-168, S57, P-208, S67 Larios L, P-10824, S73 LeBlanc K, IP-159, S32 Lecuivre J, P-12542, S95 Lepère M, P-12592, S97 Levy S, P-12508, S87, P-12512, S88 Li L, P-12544, S96 Liang M, P-12543, S95, P-12544, S96 Liao C, P-169, S57 Liese R, P-215, S68 Lincourt A, FP-209, S14, P-217, S69, P-12492, S83, P-12522, S91, P-12536, S94 Lincourt A Liu J, P-176, S59 Lo Menzo E, V-213, S102 Lomanto D, P-12542, S95 Lombard J, P-12495, S84 Lomelin D, FP-172, S48 Lont H, FP-148, S34 Lorenz R, P-11073, S73, P-12212, S76, P-12214, S76 Loss A, P-212, S68, V-218, S102 Lovins M, P-169, S57 Maag A, FP-115, S48 Macías-Amezcua M, P-12509, S87 Magalhães S, V-218, S102 Malcher F, FP-12504, S11, P-12216, S76, V-12524, S104 Manna B, P-216, S68 Marins C, P-212, S68, V-218, S102 Marques T, V-12567, S104 Martin B, FP-10933, S47 Martindale R, IP-12560, S8 Martínez-Sánchez D, P-129, S54 Matthews B, FP-182, S24, IP-12573, S36, P-12511, S88, P-12525, S92 Matyja A, P-9733, S72, P-12490, S83 Mckinney W, P-195, S64 Megison S, P-106, S51 Meyer A, FP-12504, S11, P-12216, S76, P-12222, S78, V-12210, S102, V-12524, S104 Miller K, P-194, S64 Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S105-S110 Miller M, P-205, S67 Minter R, P-12226, S80 Mirmehdi I, P-12517, S90 Miserez M, IP-12565, S40 Miyahira T, P-145, S55 Mladenovik D, P-117, S53 Molina E, P-10824, S73 Monteiro P, P-224, S70 Montes de Oca J, P-174, S58, P-179, S59 Montes JHM, P-216, S68 Montilla Navarro E, P-107, S51, P-108, S52, P-112, S52 Mora O, P-10824, S73 Moreno M, V-12488, S103 Morfesis A, P-12223, S79, P-12225, S79 Morrell A, FP-12504, S11, P-12216, S76, V-12524, S104 Mottin C, P-224, S70 Muñoz A, P-12209, S75 Murphy J, IP-12590, S45 Muschaweck U, IP-12566, S28 Muse T, P-205, S67 Nagahama T, P-190, S62 Nagle A, P-194, S64 Nakata R, P-9207, S71, P-12518, S90 Narayanan M, P-198, S65 Narula V, P-12592, S97 Nealon W, FP-10933, S47 Nery LA, P-216, S68 Nguyen D, P-12543, S95 Nguyen H, P-169, S57 Nguyen M, P-12543, S95, P-12544, S96 Nicolo E, P-12494, S84, P-12496, S84, P-12500, S86, P-12502, S86 Nikolovski A, P-117, S53 Nishihara M, P-145, S55 Norambuena M, P-12209, S75 Norrby J, P-187, S61 Novacek V, FP-186, S23, P-170, S57 Novitsky Y, FP-131, S12, IP-137, S31, FP-200, S33, FP-130, S47, FP-121, S49, FP-132, S49, FP-144, S48, P-215, S68, P-12220, S78, V-111, S99, V-210, S101 Okinaga K, P-184, S61 Okushima N, P-145, S55 Olcucuoglu E, P-188, S62 Oleynikov D, FP-172, S48 Oliveria P, P-212, S68 Olsen R, FP-12574, S14 Oommen B, FP-209, S14, FP-12493, S24, FP-12520, S25, FP-12503, S49, P-195, S64, P-12492, S83, P-12523, S91, P-12527, S92, P-12530, S93, P-12538, S94 Orenstein S, FP-131, S12, FP-200, S33, FP-144, S48, P-12220, S78 Ortiz-Ortiz C, P-12215, S76, P-12217, S77 Pachero R, P-12577, S96 Padoin A, P-224, S70 Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S105-S110 Palacios F, P-11928, S74 Palacios F, P-185, S61 Paley K, P-12486, S82 Palomo R, P-12510, S88 Palomo-Hoil R, P-129, S54 Pareja T, FP-12504, S11 Parikh P, IP-12583, S9 Park E, P-177, S59 Parra-Davila E, P-12217, S77 Pascual G, P-147, S56 Pauli E, P-9667, S71 Peacock J, FP-132, S49 Pellini B, P-11555, S73 Peralta G, P-12510, S88 Peralta-Castillo G, P-129, S54 Pérez-Köhler B, P-147, S56 Pérez-López P, P-147, S56 Peters C, P-12516, S90 Petro C, FP-131, S12, FP-200, S33, FP-214, S33, FP-130, S47, FP-144, S48, P-12220, S78, V-111, S99, V-210, S101 Petter-Puchner A, P-134, S55 Phillips M, IP-12562, S15, IP-12563, S31 Phillips S, FP-10933, S47 Pierce R, IP-12600, S46 Piper M, P-12219, S77 Plymale M, P-12508, S87, P-12512, S88 Podolsky E, P-12498, S85 Posielski N, FP-131, S12 Poulose B, IP-12582, S18, IP-12571, S21, FP-182, S24, IP-152, S44, FP-10933, S47, P-203, S66 Pozo M, V-151, S101 Prebil B, V-114, S99 Premnath R, P-180, S60 Pugh C, FP-115, S48 Quigley L, P-12528, S92, P-12533, S93, P-12537, S94, P-12540, S95 Rahman S, P-199, S65 Raigani S, FP-131, S12, FP-200, S33, FP-130, S47, FP-144, S48, FP-121, S49, P-12220, S78 Raj N, P-12487, S82 Ramos R, P-224, S70 Ramshaw B, P-12516, S90, P-12517, S90 Rappoport D, P-11928, S74, P-12209, S75 Rappoport J, P-185, S61, P-11928, S74, P-12209, S75 Rasslan S, P-102, S51, V-103, S98, V-104, S98, V-105, S99 Raval M, P-194, S64 Ravo B, P-12208, S75 Ray S, P-12525, S92 Real Romo Z, P-129, S54, P-12510, S88, V-12488, S103 Reddy A, P-198, S65 Redl H, P-134, S55 Reiner M, P-173, S58 Reinpold W, FP-12505, S23, P-10469, S72 Rettenmaier C, FP-116, S12 S109 Reynvoet E, P-12483, S81, P-12484, S82 Ribeiro D, FP-12504, S11 Riberio G, FP-12504, S11 Ripardo J, P-206, S67 Rojas A, P-12217, S77 Roll S, IP-12556, S17, P-216, S68 Romanowski C, P-12229, S80, P-12495, S84 Romo Z, P-12227, S80, V-12485, S103 Rosa R, P-212, S68 Rosales-Velderrain A, V-213, S102 Rose B, P-12223, S79, P-12225, S79 Rosen M, IP-139, S8, FP-131, S12, IP-12582, S18, FP-182, S24, FP-200, S33, FP-214, S33, FP-130, S47, FP-144, S48, FP-121, S49, FP-132, S49, P-12220, S78, V-111, S99 Rosenthal R, V-213, S102 Rosman C, FP-182, S24, FP-178, S26 Ross N, P-183, S60, V-12491, S104 Ross S, FP-209, S14, FP-12493, S24, FP-12520, S25, FP-220, S35, FP-12503, S49, P-195, S64, P-12492, S83, P-12523, S91, P-12527, S92, P-12530, S93, P-12538, S94 Roth J, IP-166, S31, IP-167, S42, IP-12589, S39, P-205, S67, P-12508, S87, P-12512, S88 Rowbottom J, P-12220, S78 Rowse P, FP-133, S34 Ruiz-Jasbon F, P-187, S61 Ruparel R, FP-133, S34 Russomanno A, P-12226, S80 Sadek R, V-128, S100 Sahoo S, P-12501, S86 Said D, P-125, S54 Salazar V, P-185, S61, P-11928, S74 Salvador P, P-107, S51, P-108, S52 Santa María V, P-174, S58 Santamaría V, P-179, S59 Santo M, P-101, S50 Sawyer M, P-8224, S71 Sbitany H, P-12219, S77 Scheuerlein H, P-12592, S97 Schouten W, FP-148, S34 Schroeder A, P-10469, S72 Schuricht A, IP-135, S38, P-12499, S85, P-12507, S87 Schwartzman A, P-122, S53 Scott J, P-215, S68 Selzer D, FP-182, S24 Shankar A, P-204, S66 Sharp K, FP-10933, S47 Shenol T, P-117, S53 Silva J, P-185, S61, P-11928, S74 Silveira P, V-218, S102 Simorov A, FP-172, S48 Sing R, FP-12493, S24, P-12492, S83 Skipworth J, P-204, S66 Slater N, P-202, S66, P-222, S69 Smith N, P-12508, S87 S110 Sobacki J, P-12497, S85 Soeken T, P-106, S51 Solecki R, P-9733, S72, P-12490, S83 Soltanian H, FP-214, S33, FP-144, S48, FP-132, S49 Soto-Edwards A, P-12226, S80 Sotomayor S, P-147, S56 Souza J, FP-109, S13, P-177, S59 Soybel D, P-9667, S71 Srinivasa D, V-171, S101 Stockmann H, FP-148, S34 Stoikes N, IP-161, S32 Suchoski J, P-12226, S80 Sugiyama G, P-122, S53 Suzuki H, P-9207, S71, P-12518, S90 Szomstein S, V-213, S102 Szura M, P-9733, S72, P-12490, S83 Tadaki C, FP-172, S48 Tajima K, P-145, S55 Takehara H, P-145, S55 Takushi Y, P-145, S55 Tam S, P-122, S53 Tamayo J, P-10824, S73 Tasciotti E, FP-12574, S14 Tejirian T, P-12218, S77 Tessier D, IP-138, S39 Tevis S, P-219, S69 Thompson D, P-12511, S88 Timmermans L, FP-207, S13, P-150, S56, P-168, S57, P-208, S67 Torres O, P-10469, S72, P-12209, S75 Troisi R, P-12483, S81 Tsirline V, FP-12493, S24, FP-12520, S25, P-217, S69, P-12527, S92 Turquier F, FP-186, S23, P-170, S57 Uchida E, P-9207, S71, P-12518, S90 Uehara H, P-145, S55 Uppal L, P-204, S66 Ursu D, P-12226, S80 Ushinohama A, P-206, S67 Utiyama E, P-102, S51, V-103, S98, V-104, S98, V-105, S99 Van Der Fraenen D, P-12484, S82 Van Doorn H, FP-148, S34 Van Eps J, FP-12574, S14 van Goor H, IP-12551, S28, P-202, S66, P-222, S69 van Jarwaarde J, FP-11345, S25 van Kempen B, P-168, S57 van Laarhoven C, FP-126, S11 Van Overbeke I, P-12483, S81 van Rooji F, P-168, S57 Van Sickle K, V-12231, S103 Hernia (2014) 18 (Suppl 1): S105-S110 Vanlander A, P-12483, S81 Vargas K, P-12515, S89 Vergara Suarez F, P-108, S52 Villegas-Cabelllo O, P-129, S54 Vinhas L, V-218, S102 Voeller G, IP-12558, S20, IP-12559, S21 Vriens P, FP-126, S11 Vyas S, P-204, S66 Wada N, P-9903, S72, V-143, S100 Wallace J, FP-116, S12 Walters A, FP-209, S14, FP-12520, S25, P-217, S69, P-12235, S81, P-12522, S91, P-12523, S91, P-12529, S93, P-12530, S93, P-12536, S94, P-12538, S94 Walters AL, FP-220, S35 Wang J, FP-131, S12 Warren J, P-12515, S89, P-12528, S92, P-12533, S93, P-12537, S94, P-12540, S95 Wassef A, V-128, S100 Watanabe M, P-9207, S71, P-12518, S90 Weiner B, FP-12574, S14 Weyhe D, P-12542, S95 Whittington H, P-12508, S87 Wichers P, FP-11345, S25 Wiegmann D, FP-115, S48 Wiese M, P-12214, S76 Wijnhoven B, FP-148, S34 Wilke R, P-175, S58 Williams K, FP-209, S14, P-12235, S81, P-12522, S91, P-12527, S92, P-12529, S93, P-12536, S94, P-12538, S94 Wilson T, P-12543, S95, V-171, S101 Wittmann J, P-134, S55 Workman C, P-12521, S91 Wormer B, FP-220, S35, P-12235, S81, P-12522, S91, P-12529, S93, P-12538, S94 Wright R, P-123, S53 Wu A, P-173, S58 Wu Y, FP-132, S49 Xu Z, P-203, S66 Yamaoka K, P-184, S61 Yanaga K, P-191, S63 Yazgan A, P-188, S62 Yoo J, P-12498, S85 Yoshida K, P-191, S63 Young J, FP-113, S35, P-12234, S81 Zabel D, P-192, S63, P-193, S63, P-196, S64, P-11732, S74, P-12180, S74, P-12221, S78 Zemlyak A, P-217, S69, P-12527, S92 Zihni A, P-12511, S88 Zwischenberger B, P-205, S67 SM Apply for Membership Online: www.americanherniasociety.org/membership-application/ or Complete this Membership Application Active membershipTAffiliate membership TResident or Fellow membershipT NAME:______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ first name PREFERRED MAILING ADDRESS: middle initial last name HOME T OFFICET degree(s) all correspondence will be sent to address provided below ADDRESS: __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ CITY: ____________________________________________________________STATE:___________ZIP CODE:__________________ COUNTRY:______________________________________________ E-MAIL :____________________________________________________________ OFFICE PHONE: ________________________ FAX: ___________________________ ALTERNATE PHONE: _____________________________ GENDER: MALET FEMALE T WEBSITE URL:_______________________________________________ SURGICAL RESIDENCY AT :_______________________________________________________________________________________________________ DATE OF PROGRAM COMPLETION: ____________________ PROGRAM DIRECTOR LETTER for resident/ fellow member applicants only letter must attest to participation in the program as well as professional character T ADDRESS PUBLISHING OPTIONS: PHONE PUBLISHING OPTIONS: TDo not publish my address TPublish my address TInclude the telephone number when publishing the address TInclude the fax number when publishing the address DUES: ACTIVE / AFFILIATE MEMBERSHIP $160 RESIDENT/ FELLOW MEMBERSHIP $25 Annual Dues * $160 A n n u a l D u es* $25 *dues are for January 1st through December 31st of the year in which applicant joins and are NOT prorated payment must be included with application METHOD of PAYMENT: VISA T MASTERCARD T DISCOVER T AMEX T CHECKT made payable to American Hernia Society must be in U.S. dollars CARD #:________________________________EXPIRATION DATE:_______________ NAME ON CARD: _________________________________________________________ BILLING ADDRESS:_______________________________________________________ Please mail, email, or fax payment to: Americas Hernia Society 4582 S Ulster Street, Suite 201 • Denver, CO 80237 • 303-567-7899 • 866-798-5406 (toll-free) 303-771-2550 (fax) • [email protected] • www.americanherniasociety.org Outcomes Up. Costs Down. Value All Around. Finally – an alternative to biologics! GORE® BIO-A® Tissue Reinforcement is a unique non-biologic scaffold that is gradually absorbed by the body. The open, highly interconnected 3D pore structure facilitates cell infiltration and growth. Vascularization begins quickly within one to two weeks. tTZOUIFUJDCJPBCTPSCBCMFUJTTVFTDBGGPME t3BQJEDFMMQPQVMBUJPOBOEWBTDVMBSJ[BUJPO t7FSTBUJMFGPSOVNFSPVTBQQMJDBUJPOT t"WBJMBCMFJOMBSHFTJ[FTVQUPDNYDN With a three-year shelf life and no soaking, refrigeration or tracking required, this versatile material is the easy-to-use, performance-proven alternative that offers value for surgeons and hospitals. Gore. Because material really does matter. 8-(PSF"TTPDJBUFT*ODt'MBHTUBGG";tHPSFNFEJDBMDPN Products listed may not be available in all markets. GORE®, BIO-A®, PERFORMANCE THROUGH INNOVATION, and designs are trademarks of W. L. Gore & Associates. Ü8-(PSF"TTPDJBUFT*OD"4&/+"/6"3: Visit Gore at EHS Booth #102
© Copyright 2025 ExpyDoc