CPAP, SiPAP, High Flow - Michigan Society for Respiratory Care

CPAP, SIPAP, HIGH FLOW NASAL
CANNULA IN INFANTS: WHICH
SHOULD YOU CHOOSE, WHEN,
AND WHY?
Joanne Nicks, RRT
Clinical Education Coordinator
Mott Respiratory Care
Mott Children’s Hospital, Ann Arbor
What is CPAP???
CPAP: Continuous Positive Airway Pressure
 The
concept of CPAP is very simple
Inspiratory flow
 Resistance to flow on exhalation

Exhalation valve
 Water column
 Flow generator (venturi)
 Flow itself can create resistance on exhalation

Continuous Positive Airway Pressure
 Ideal





CPAP
Simple
Constant, stable pressure
Low work of breathing
Humidification
Comfortable interface covering a range
of patient sizes
NEONATAL RESPIRATORY
DISTRESS: WHERE IT ALL BEGAN
 In
the 1960’s, mortality from “Hyaline
Membrane Disease” was the major cause of
death in the United States

 At
President Kennedy’s son, Patrick, died of
HMD in 1963; he weighed 2.11 kg
this time, treatment modalities such as
NCPAP, Mechanical Ventilation, and
surfactant replacement therapy did not
exist
 In fact, Neonatal Intensive Care units were
not developed until the early 1960’s
HISTORY OF INFANT CPAP

Gregory, et al in 1971, published “treatment of
Idiopathic Respiratory Distress Syndrome with
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure” in New
England Journal of Medicine

Initially used with endotracheal tube, then adapted
with mask
Use of CPAP Dropped Drastically
in the 1970’s and 1980’s
Prongs very uncomfortable
Damaging effects of CPAP
IMPROVEMENTS IN THE
“NEWER” CPAP SYSTEMS

“Kinder and gentler” approach to CPAP
Softer prongs made of silicone
 Prongs that are shaped to seal without having to
be pushed all the way in the nose
 Small silicone nasal masks
 CPAP systems that offer lower work of breathing
and bi-level pressure delivery

Effects of CPAP
 Increases
FRC and reduces atelectasis
 Increase tidal volume and reduces
respiratory rate with RDS
 Dilates airways and reduces inspiratory
resistance
 Improves V/Q and reduces R>L
shunting
 Reduces upper airway obstruction;
stents airways open
 Stimulates respiratory reflexes, possibly
reducing mild apnea
Why CPAP?
Vol
Vol
Pressure
Normal
Ppl
Vol
Vol
Pressure
RDS
Pressure
CPAP
Indications for CPAP
 Spontaneously
breathing infants with
respiratory distress at birth
 Atelectasis, pulmonary edema or
hemorrhage
 Apnea of prematurity
 Early/Post extubation

INSURE (Intubate, surfactant, extubation)
reduced need for ventilation
 Tracheomalacia
and airway collapse
Complications of CPAP
 Increase
work of
breathing
 Respiratory failure
 Pneumothorax
 Changes in cerebral
blood flow
 “CPAP” belly
Limitations to CPAP
 Keeping
to interface on patient with
good seal
 Pressure instability due to open mouth
Chin strap
Pacifier
Contraindications for CPAP
 Respiratory
Failure with elevated PaCO2
 Profound apnea
 Upper airway abnormalities (cleft palate,
choanal atresia)
 Tracheoesophageal fistula
 Diaphragmatic hernia
 Severe cardiovascular instability
TYPES OF INFANT CPAP SYSTEMS

Conventional CPAP

Utilizes conventional ventilator circuit and
ventilator to generate CPAP.

Continuous flow through circuit with resistance applied
at exhalation valve
Delivered by prongs or mask through most current
ventilators (Servo I, PB 840, Drager Babylog, AVEA)
 Some companies have their own CPAP products
(Drager) and others use universal types (Hudson,
INCA, Argyle)

CONVENTIONAL INFANT
CPAP INTERFACES
Argyle CPAP Prongs
Neotech Long Prongs
Hudson CPAP
TYPES OF INFANT CPAP SYSTEMS

Conventional CPAP Apparatus
Drager BabyFlow CPAP Device
CONVENTIONAL INFANT CPAP

Advantages

More cost effective; one device for CPAP or
ventilation


More costly if ventilation is not needed
Disadvantages:

Continuous flow CPAP delivery may increase WOB

Pressure varies throughout respiratory cycle
Ref: Moa and Nilsson 1988
TYPES OF INFANT CPAP SYSTEMS

Bubble CPAP is probably one of the earlier
methods of delivering CPAP
Bubble CPAP

Inspiratory Flow with expiratory limb placed in
column of water

Depth in centimeters equals cmH2O pressure
Bubble CPAP
 CPAP
made a resurgence into clinical
practice in the late 1980’s

Dr. Jen Tien Wung began using Bubble CPAP
in the NICU Delivery Room at Columbia
University in 1987
Avoidance intubation with early CPAP use
 Lower incidence of BPD and Chronic Lung
Disease in neonates at Columbia compared to
other NICU’s has been reported repeatedly


Morley, et al (2008) randomly assigned 608
infants (25-28 weeks) to early NCPAP vs.
intubation and ventilation. There was no
difference in mortality or BPD
Bubble CPAP: Newer Systems
B&B BubblePAP
Advantages of Bubble CPAP
Simple, inexpensive setups
 Constant CPAP Pressure
 One study showed enhanced ventilation with
bubble CPAP (oscillation effect)
 Subsequent studies showed dampening of
pressure distally with no oscillation at lung
periphery and no improvement in gas exchange

TYPES OF INFANT CPAP SYSTEMS

Variable Flow CPAP
Initially introduced by Hamilton with the Aladdin
CPAP System > Arabella
 Infant Flow by Viasys (CareFusion)

How does Variable Flow CPAP work?

Utilizes a specially designed nasal piece that
uses fluidics to deliver flow
Fluidic Flip Action
Variable Flow CPAP
During inspiration,
flow is directed
towards the infant
 During exhalation,
flow is directed
away from the
infant

Variable Flow CPAP Advantages

Lower work of breathing as flow is available on
patient demand
Klausner, et al (1996) studied the Fluidic Flow
Driver and showed reduced WOB by 75% compared
to conventional CPAP
 Pandit, et al (2001) reported increase volumes and
lower WOB


Pressures are more stable throughout
respiratory cycle
Ref: Moa and Nilsson 1988
Variable Flow CPAP Circuit
Expiratory Channel
Intranasal
Pressure
Monitoring
Twin Jet Injector Nozzles
Gas Inlet
Variable Flow CPAP Circuit
SiPAP and Variable Flow CPAP
What is SiPAP
Delivers CPAP and inspiratory pressure (up to
10 cmH2O)
 Potential benefits

Recruit lung volume
 Off-load respiratory work (Vt-3-6 ml/kg)
 Stimulate respiratory center

SiPAP Clinical Trials

Lista, et al, study (Milan, Italy, 2009) compared
NCPAP (Group A) vs. Bi-level (Group B) using
SiPAP device (total 40 patients)
Preemies with AGA 30wks
 Mean Pressure 6 cmH2O




Group A, 6cmH2O CPAP
Group B, 8cmH2O high pressure and 4.5cmH2O low
pressure
Significantly longer need for ventilatory
support (6.2 v. 3.4 days) and oxygen
dependency (13.8 vs. 6.5 days) in CPAP vs. Bilevel group
SiPAP Clinical Trials

Moretti, et al (Italy, 2008) compared
extubation to NCPAP vs. NIPPV


90% success in NIPPV vs. 61% in CPAP
Failure of NIPPV related to the following:
ELBW babies less than 750 grams unable to
maintain ventilation and oxygenation
 Intubation after 72 hours due to micro-atelectasis
 Preemies with infection/sepsis

High Flow Nasal Cannula
Vapotherm High Flow Nasal Cannula System
High Flow Nasal Cannula
Fisher Paykel High Flow System
High Flow Nasal Cannula
 What
is the buzz about?
Ease of use
 Better tolerated by baby
 Less trauma
 Heated humidity

 But
is it CPAP?
“Vapotherm devices are not Continuous Positive
Airway Pressure devices and are not designed to
deliver a set pressure. The technology is designed
to deliver conditioned gas flows in an open system
via a simple nasal cannula”, Dr. Miller, Director of
Clinical Research and Education, Vapotherm.
High Flow Nasal Cannula
 What

Flow rates that exceed inspiratory
flowrates without entrainment of room air


is High Flow Therapy?
Over 2 liters in infants and 6 liters in adults
Optimal conditioning of gas for 99%
relative humidity, while maintaining body
temperature
High Flow Nasal Cannula
 What
are the physiologic benefits of
High Flow Nasal Cannula?

Enhanced respiratory efficiency by flushing
out nasopharyngeal anatomical deadspace


Minimizes inspiratory resistance with flows
that meet or exceed the patient’s
inspiratory flow


Facilitates not only oxygenation, but carbon
dioxide elimination
Lowers resistive work of breathing
Adequate warming of the airways improves
conductance
HFNC and Pressure

What is the relationship between Pressure and
Flow?
Locke, et al (1993, Pediatrics) reported
inadvertent pressure, even at low flows, with the
use of prongs that are relatively large for the size
of the nares
 Sreenan, et al (2001, Pediatrics) reported nasal
cannula flow with relatively large prongs can
generate up to 8 cm H2O pharyngeal pressure
 The amount of pressure generated is related to
the amount of leak around the prongs and mouth


Prongs ½ the diameter of the nares with open mouth
generates very little pressure
HFNC and Pressure
 What
is the relationship between
Pressure and Flow?


Saslow and colleagues (2006, J Perinat),
reported that at 8 liters of flow in the
neonate, the pressure is not greater than 6
cmH2O
Kubicka and colleagues (2008, Pediatrics),
reported at 5 liters of flow with 0.2 cm OD
cannula, pressure never exceed 5 cmH2O

Author cautioned that use of larger cannula
with closed mouth or use in infants less than
1000g may result in higher pressures
Clinical Benefits of HFNC
 Many
studies have shown positive
clinical benefits of HFNC


Sun (2004) in109 infants from <500g >1500g, reported no evidence of
barotrauma, CPAP belly, nosocomial
infection, nasal trauma, or nasal mucus
plugging in infants treated with HFNC for
mild to moderate RDS
Shoemaker (2007), JPerinat, reported
ventilator days decreased with use of HFNC,
higher intubation rates with early CPAP
compared to early HFNC in infants <30wks
gestation
Clinical Efficacy of HFNC
 Some
studies have showed lack of
efficacy with HFNC compared to CPAP

Campbell and colleagues (2006), J Perinat,
randomized 40 patients to either CPAP
(5-6 cmH2O) or HFNC and reintubation
rate in the HFNC group was 60%
compared to 15% in the NCPAP group
High Flow Nasal Cannula:
Some Conclusions
 HFNC
can produce positive airway pressure
and this pressure is:
Variable (may range from trivial to significant)
 Unpredictable
 Unregulated
 Related to flow, prong size, and patient size



Use with caution in VLBW preemies (lower flows and
smaller prongs)
Sufficient to produce clinical effects and/or
changes in pulmonary function
High Flow Nasal Cannula:
Other Conclusions
 HFNC
should not be regarded as a form of
CPAP, but rather as a distinct respiratory
modality with its own merits
 HFNC is a more user friendly modality
than CPAP and will continue to be widely
used
 Well designed high quality studies are
need to support the efficacy of HFNC in
the neonatal patient and to clarify
potential benefits vs. adverse
consequences
Clear as Mud?
References
Davis, PG: Non-invasive respiratory support of
preterm neonates with respiratory distress:
Continuous positive airway pressure and nasal
intermittent positive pressure ventilation
(Seminars in Fetal & Neonatal Medicine 2009)
 Polin, RA: Continuous positive airway pressure:
Old questions and new controversies (2008,
Journal Neonatl-Perinatal Medicine)

References
De Clerk:Humidified High Flow Nasal Cannula,
is it the New and Improved CPAP? (Advances in
Neonatal Care)
 Miller, T: High Flow Therapy and
Humidification, a Summary of Mechanisms of
Action, Thechnology, and Research
(Vapotherm website)

Questions????