技術紹介 ディーゼル エンジン向け排気後処理SCRシステム用,低通気抵抗 ミキサーデバイスの開発 Development of Low Pressure-drop Static Mixer Device for Diesel Engine SCR After-treatment System フルニエ オリビエ * 今村 勉 * 大内 健 ** 渡部 昇 ** Olivier FOURNIER Tsutomu IMAMURA Ken OOUCHI Noboru WATANABE 要 旨 選択触媒還元(SCR)付の排気後処理システムに対して,尿素水からアンモニアを効率的に高く発生 する事が窒素酸化物(NOx)の浄化性能向上の一つである.理想的には,高い排ガス温度と尿素噴霧位 置から SCR 触媒までに十分長い距離を有していればアンモニアの発生には特に問題ない.但し,自動 車のレイアウト課題に於いては,短いガス通路と低い排気ガス温度でも高いアンモニアの発生率が必要 であり,様々なミキサーデバイス品での NOx 浄化性能向上が確認されているが同時に通気抵抗を悪化 させる要因となる.本内容は,排ガスの流れをスワールさせるミキサーを流れ解析(CFD)によって設 計し,圧損と NOx 浄化性能の実験で確認した結果を解説する. Abstract For exhaust after-treatment systems using Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) technology, efficiently producing ammonia from a urea liquid feed is a key process to reduce Nitrogen Oxides (NOx). Ideally, high exhaust gas temperature and a long distance between the urea feeding and the SCR catalyst will be sufficient to get good results. However, due to automotive layout constraints, such results are required even with short gas path and low running temperatures. This has led to a wide variety of devices which increase NOx conversion by improving urea mixing but also bring important pressuredrop penalty. In this paper, a static mixer based on swirl generating concept is designed with the help of Computer Fluid Dynamics (CFD) analysis to minimize pressure-drop and increase NOx conversion as much as possible; then performances are verified by cold flow and engine bench tests. Key Word : Heat engine, Post treatment system, Selective Catalytic Reduction NOx removal / Swirl, Static mixer 1. INTRODUCTION Faced with new challenging regulations such as Japan 2015 Fuel Economy Standard, Japan 2016 emission legislation (post-PNLT) and US EPA 2010, diesel engines are been required to improve their fuel consumption while keeping reducing their exhaust pollutants. Although several technologies and strategies are still competing on the best way to satisfy the most stringent emission limits; exhaust after-treatment systems like those shown in Figure 1, using the Selective Catalytic Reduction (hereafter refers as SCR) technology seems to be the preferred way of eliminating Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) with the minimum fuel consumption penalty. Figure 1. Schematic of SCR After-treatment System Layout Frequently Encountered on Truck Applications *排気事業本部 排気システム開発グループ **実験研究センター 実験技術グループ 67 CALSONIC KANSEI TECHNICAL REVIEW vol.8 2011 The specificity of those systems is the use of a SCR of the exhaust pressure-drop was measured to have 1% catalyst which requires the presence of ammonia (NH3) to 3% impact on the vehicle mileage; it is found that there to reduce NOx pollutants. Technically and due to safety issues, aqueous urea (frequently called Diesel Exhaust is a non-negligible need for a mixer device design to be Fluid – DEF in automotive application) is used instead In the following study, mixers' performances are measured of ammonia (1). With sufficient temperature, DEF will by three criteria: the flow velocity Uniformity Index evaporate and hydrolyze to form required ammonia. (UI) calculated by CFD, the NOx conversion measured The literature shows that urea mixing devices minimize the pressure-drop penalty. experimentally and the Pressure-drop which is both generating swirl movement in the exhaust gas, estimated from fluid analysis and measured on test bench. represent efficient solutions to increase the NO x conversion efficiency of the previously describe systems, 3. CFD BASED MIXER DESIGN INVESTIGATION by improving the gas flow uniformity ahead of the SCR Static mixer devices design should satisfy several catalyst (2),(3),(4). targets and functions, sometimes leading to trade-off In this study, the development of a static mixing device characteristics. Mixer are here composed of several that lowers the pressure-drop penalty and provides the blades oriented at a specified angle as shown in Figure 3; highest possible NOx conversion efficiency is presented. and designed to mix urea droplets with the exhaust gas 2. DEVELOPMENT TARGET stream by generating swirl, a rotational movement of the gas flow. Analysis of typical SCR after-treatment system From the low pressure-drop target point of view, sudden backpressure shows in Figure 2 that mixer the device variations in the gas flow cross-sections shall be avoided, can accounts for almost half of the full system pressure- while reducing wall surfaces will be beneficial for drop. lowering gas flow friction. On the other hand, for the NOx conversion improvement, mixer design will rely on two functions. The first is to promote DEF evaporation by adding wall surfaces thus increasing chance for droplets to hit a“hot”surface and thermally breakup. And the second is to generate swirl to achieve a uniform distribution of ammonia and NOx upfront the SCR catalyst. Figure 2. Benchmarked After-treatment System's Main Components and Mixer Device Pressure-drop Ratios It is known from benchmark activities, that pressure-drop of SCR after-treatment system for Heavy Duty trucks can range from 10 to 25kPa at engine full load. Thus considering that from engine bench trials, a 10kPa variation 68 Figure3. Mixer Device Design (Three Blades at 45 degrees) ディーゼル エンジン向け排気後処理 SCR システム用,低通気抵抗ミキサーデバイスの開発 Summarized in Table 1 are six static mixers designed to According to the mixer functions explained previously, achieve various levels of swirl; their flow characteristics the different designs are evaluated in regard of two and pressure-drop are investigated by Computer Fluid performance criteria: the flow velocity Uniformity Index Dynamic (CFD) analysis and results are reported (UI) ahead of the SCR catalyst, and the Pressure-drop. hereafter. Table 2 and 3 summarize the results obtained from the CFD analysis. Table 1. Static Mixer Design Variation Matrix Figure 4 and 5 show how the mixer's blades design affect the exhaust gas flow velocity. It is found that the number of blades and the blades' angle have a similar effect on the swirl velocity. A high number of blades combine with an important deflection angle generating higher swirl velocity. Table 2. Flow Velocity and Pressure-drop Sensitivity to Mixer's Blades Number (for 45 degrees Blades Angle) Figure 4. Swirl Velocity vs. Mixer's Blades Number (for Blades Angled at 45 degrees) Table 3. Flow Velocity and Pressure-drop Sensitivity to Mixer's Blades Angle (for Three-blade Design) Figure 5. Swirl velocity vs. Mixer's Blade Angle (for Three-blade Layout) Regarding the overall mixer performance, the flow velocity Uniformity Index (UI) ahead of the SCR catalyst and the Pressure-drop are in Figure 6 plotted against the Swirl Velocity. It is found that by inducing high swirl movement, mixers also tend to degrade both the flow velocity distribution and the pressure-drop. 69 CALSONIC KANSEI TECHNICAL REVIEW vol.8 2011 4.2. Mixing performance Mixing performance is verified by measurement of NOx conversion rates on an engine test bench using a four cylinders, common rail equipped diesel engine. The components' layout is similar to the one described in Figure 1. The exhaust system includes an oxidation catalyst, a catalyzed filter and a SCR catalyst, all sized for truck application. The urea injector is located in the elbow upfront the mixer device. Mixers' NO x conversion performances are done for different gas mass flow and temperatures as summarized in Table 3. Figure 6. Trade-off between Flow Uniformity Index,… Pressure-drop and Swirl Velocity Table 4. Engine Testing Points for SCR System NOx Conversion Verification The high Swirl velocity, which is expected to increase urea mixing with the gas flow, seems in opposition with the need for higher flow velocity uniformity and lower pressure-drop. 4. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS 4.1. Correlation with CFD Pressure-drop results Experimental verification of pressure-drop is done on a cold flow bench and measurements are made up to a mass flow of 2100 kg/h. The full SCR after-treatment system is tested with and without the mixing devices. Figure 7 shows that CFD results for pressure-drop are well correlated with experimental ones, with an average Firstly, all the NOx conversion results for the five testing points are averaged and compared, in Figure 8, with the Swirl velocity obtained from the CFD analysis. It shows a noticeable decrease in the NOx conversion performance for the mixer with the highest Swirl velocity. This is believed to be related with the degradation of the flow velocity distribution upfront the SCR catalyst. error margin of 20% when using all tested mixers' data at both low, medium and high mass flow rates. It can be noted that prediction accuracy also greatly increases to less than 10% error, when low mass flow data are excluded. Figure 8. Measured NOx Conversion Performance versus Calculated Swirl Velocity Secondly, the above conversion results are plotted against the measured pressure-drop. Figure 9 shows a Figure 7. Correlation between CFD and Test Results for Full After-treatment System Pressure-drop 70 general trade-off pattern between emission performances and pressure-drop. ディーゼル エンジン向け排気後処理 SCR システム用,低通気抵抗ミキサーデバイスの開発 Figure 9. Trade-off between Measured NOx Conversion Performance and Pressure-drop It is noticed that the pressure-drop penalty worsen as Figure 10. Urea Spray Pattern and Wall Film Injection Start Exhaust Gas Temperature 200℃ (Top) and 300℃ (Bottom) the conversion performance improves. It is also found that the mixer designed with three blades oriented at 45 degrees against the gas flow, can be described as the best performer of the tested mixers. The mixer presents the higher NOx conversion rate increases, with nearly 30% compared to a pipe without mixer layout. Regarding pressure-drop, it ranks second with a penalty of only 2.4kPa, which means less than 1% impact on the vehicle mileage. Analyzing the previous data separately for each gas mass flow rate reveals that the three blades at 45 degrees mixer design's improvement in NOx conversion performances is stronger at low mass flow and further increases when gas temperature increases. However concerning the mixing mechanism, it is observed from deposits on exhaust system parts that the urea spray hits the wall before reaching the mixer and can even flow backward depending on the testing conditions. This emphasis the need to take into account more detailed CFD analysis which can accurately simulate the urea spraying and the ammonia production and distribution mechanisms before and after the mixer device. 5. UREA SPRAY CFD ANALYSIS TRIAL To verify the urea spraying behavior at operating exhaust temperatures, a trial CFD analysis is done using the AVL company software FIRE®. Due to the trial nature of this analysis, only one mixer, the three blades oriented at 45 degrees design, is studied at two different temperature conditions, while other parameters such as gas mass flow and urea injection parameters are kept the same. Figure11. Urea Spray Pattern and Wall Film Injection End Exhaust Gas Temperature 200℃ (Top) and 300℃ (Bottom) Figure 10 and 11 show the results of the analysis; they draw the urea droplets size distribution and trajectory, and also visualize the urea film created by deposition of the droplets on the walls. Spray patterns and wall film thickness are presented for exhaust gas temperatures of 200℃ and 300℃ ; and for two different points in time, near the urea injection beginning (1.09s) and near the injection end (1.82s). Analysis results confirm that the urea spray is greatly deflected toward the duct wall before it can hit the mixer. Urea wallfilm illustrations also confirm that for low temperature conditions, droplets hitting the exhaust pipe before the mixer accumulate on the wall between the injector and the mixer. It is also noticed that the urea film tends to flow back towards the injector nozzle. 71 CALSONIC KANSEI TECHNICAL REVIEW vol.8 2011 6. CONCLUSION A static mixer based on swirl generating concept, is designed with the help of CFD analysis to minimize the pressure-drop penalty and increase NOx conversion as much as possible. The design with three blades at 45 degrees achieves an increase of 30% in the NOx conversion rate, while pressure-drop is only 2.4kPa. While simple CFD tools are good enough to predict the mixer pressure-drop levels, it is found that more complex analysis of urea spraying are required to correctly estimate the mixing performances. The present study will be followed by further investigations on the mechanism through which the Swirl affects the NOx conversion rate; and also on the feasible performance increase through the optimization of the urea injector location and orientation, at different exhaust gas flow conditions. REFERENCES (1) Diesel Emission and Their Control, Magdi K. Khair and W. Addy Majewski, SAE International, 2006, p.418 (2) Mixer Development for Urea SCR Applications, G. Zheng and Al., SAE paper 2009-01-2879 (3) Urea systems in Focus – New Challenges and Solutions in the Development of Car and Commercial Vehicle Exhaust Systems, J. J. Oesterle and Al., SAE paper 2008-01-1186 (4) D e v e l o p m e n t o f P M a n d N O x R e d u c t i o n Aftertreatment System for Heavy-Duty Commercial Vehicle (First Report), M. Kowada and Al., JSAE paper 201005725 72 フルニエ オリビエ 今村 勉 大内 健 渡部 昇 論 文 CKテクニカルレビューでは、これまでも「技術紹介」と「論文」を分けて掲載し、前者は我々の製 品のそれぞれ拠り所となる技術を解説し、後者は将来必ずや役立つであろう要素や基盤になる技術を紹 介してきました。論文は、技術の高みに到達するための礎であり、真に競争力のある製品を生み続ける ためにも、多くの優れた論文を発表し、足元を固めるとともに、我々は、論文を通しても、優れた共同 研究者とともに、グローバルにオープンにこれを進めたいと考えています。今回のテクニカルレビュー では、埼玉大学の寄稿論文の他、大学の協力を得て作成された幾つかの論文を紹介しています。これらが、 CK-WAYに裏打ちされた新たな技術のチャレンジを呼び、多くの技術者と、お互いに刺激しあいな がら、新たなチャレンジを目指したいと考えています。 21世紀も10年が経過し、自動車産業においても電動系車両の技術の台頭とともに環境の世紀とし て、新たなルネッサンスが求められています。ダビンチの時代のように一人の天才が多くの傑作を創造 した時代とは相違し、今は、多くの知見からチームが新しい革新を生み出していく時代のように感じて います。そのためには、論文を通してのコミュニケーションは大変有用であり、ますます盛んにコミュ ニケーションを行うためにもこういった場を使っていただければと考えております。 今回、本テクニカルレビューに特別寄稿をいただいた、埼玉大学大学院 綿貫啓一教授に、この場を お借りして、あらためて謝意を申し上げます。 鬼児島 昌義(常務執行役員) 73
© Copyright 2024 ExpyDoc