Progress Report 2014/8/7 Wed Rikiishi Kazuki A/I -IMC-x4 , IMC-y4にEnergy Depositの違いがないかを確認 -Trigger Rate vs Energy ThresholdのグラフをError Bar 付きに更新 -1GeV, 3GeV, 5GeV, 10GeVの電子に対するTrigger がTASC Dominant , IMC Dominant, 50:50になるようなThreshold設定を算出 -> Rateに重ねるのがよくわからなかった。 Rejection をどう比べる? -> もう一度教えてほしい. Trigger Rate vs Energy Threshold -エラーバーはRMS -横軸の Energy Thresholdは 電子のEfficiencyを線形補完し, それが50%を満たすときの Energy として定義 IMC-x ,IMC-y の違い 1GeV 5GeV 10GeV あまり違いはない IMC , TASCのThreshold設定 ①10GeV [i] 50:50 IMC 29 MIP 61% TASC 50 MIP 50% Trigger 50% ②5GeV [i] 50:50 IMC 18 MIP 62% TASC 27 MIP 65% Trigger 50% ③3GeV [i] 50:50 IMC 14 MIP 63% TASC 17 MIP 71% Trigger 51% ④1GeV [i] 50:50 IMC 5 MIP 72% TASC 5 MIP 69% Trigger 53% [ii]TASC Dominant IMC 15 MIP 93% TASC 55MIP 47% Trigger 47% [ii]TASC Dominant IMC 10 MIP 93% TASC 30MIP 51% Trigger 51% [ii]TASC Dominant IMC 9 MIP 87% TASC 19MIP 51% Trigger 49% [ii]TASC Dominant IMC 3 MIP 91% TASC 6 MIP 48% Trigger 45% [iii]IMC Dominant IMC 34 MIP 51% TASC 35 MIP 89% Trigger 51% [iii]IMC Dominant IMC 21 MIP 50% TASC 22 MIP 84% Trigger 48% [iii]IMC Dominant IMC 15 MIP 57% TASC 15 MIP 82% Trigger 52% [iii]IMC Dominant IMC 6 MIP 59% TASC 4 MIP 85% Trigger 52% To Do
© Copyright 2024 ExpyDoc
